Equus caballus isolate Twilight breed thoroughbred chromosome 26, EquCab3.0, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Laurasiatheria; Perissodactyla; Equidae; Equus.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM009173.1.\nOn Jan 25, 2018 this sequence version replaced NC_009169.2.\nAssembly name: EquCab3.0\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the University of California,\nSanta Cruz on 2018/01/05. The original whole-genome shotgun project\nhas the accession PJAA00000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: University of California, Santa Cruz\nAssembly Date :: 2017\nAssembly Method :: Celera Assembler v. 2017; HiRise v. 2017\nAssembly Name :: EquCab3.0\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 88.0x\nSequencing Technology :: Sanger; Illumina HiSeq; PacBio\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Equus caballus Annotation Release\n 103\nAnnotation Version :: 103\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.0\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 17% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 34 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 11% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X39
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X23
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X47
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X26
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X36
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X19
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X3
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X2
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X38
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X30
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X17
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X11
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X14
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X1
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X35
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X9
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X50
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X49
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X48
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X6
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X14
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X18
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X10
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X5
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X3
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X12
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X22
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X29
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X6
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X42
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X13
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X40
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X33
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X28
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X28
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X19
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X20
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X8
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X5
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X37
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X13
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X46
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X34
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X29
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X18
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X41
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X8
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X44
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X21
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X17
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X11
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X23
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X7
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X27
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X16
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X10
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X4
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X7
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X45
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X16
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X9
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X4
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X2
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X43
uncharacterized protein LOC102150103 isoform X26
microRNA 9024; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
microRNA 9030; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger protein 654, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 100 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 654, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 101 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 654, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 89 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 654, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 654, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 654, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 654, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 180 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pituitary-specific positive transcription factor 1
charged multivesicular body protein 2B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 169 samples with support for all annotated introns
charged multivesicular body protein 2B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
charged multivesicular body protein 2b isoform X1
charged multivesicular body protein 2b isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
vestigial like family member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
vestigial like family member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
vestigial like family member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription cofactor vestigial-like protein 3 isoform X1
transcription cofactor vestigial-like protein 3 isoform X2
transcription cofactor vestigial-like protein 3 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00004
cell adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC106782605, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC106782605, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106782605, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111770811, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111770811, transcript variant X1
roundabout guidance receptor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
roundabout guidance receptor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
roundabout guidance receptor 1, transcript variant X7
roundabout guidance receptor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
roundabout guidance receptor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 76 samples with support for all annotated introns
roundabout guidance receptor 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 76 samples with support for all annotated introns
roundabout guidance receptor 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
roundabout guidance receptor 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111770785, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111770785, transcript variant X2
roundabout guidance receptor 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
roundabout guidance receptor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
roundabout guidance receptor 2, transcript variant X1
roundabout guidance receptor 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
roundabout guidance receptor 2, transcript variant X5
roundabout guidance receptor 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
roundabout guidance receptor 2, transcript variant X8
roundabout guidance receptor 2, transcript variant X9
roundabout guidance receptor 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
roundabout guidance receptor 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
roundabout guidance receptor 2, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111770798, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111770798, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 isoform X1
canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1 isoform X2
heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 162 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 13, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
SAM domain, SH3 domain and nuclear localization signals 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SAM domain, SH3 domain and nuclear localization signals 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 90 samples with support for all annotated introns
SAM domain-containing protein SAMSN-1 isoform X2
SAM domain-containing protein SAMSN-1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 10% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nuclear receptor interacting protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
nuclear receptor interacting protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor-interacting protein 1 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC102147870, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102147870, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102147905, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102147905, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X6
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X4
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X2
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X3
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X6
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X7
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X7
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X5
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X8
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X9
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X11
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X10
microRNA 99a-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA let-7c; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 125b-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
CXADR, Ig-like cell adhesion molecule, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
CXADR, Ig-like cell adhesion molecule, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 113 samples with support for all annotated introns
coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor isoform X2
coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 141 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 26 C21orf91 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 148 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 26 C21orf91 homolog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 26 C21orf91 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 2% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
neural cell adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural cell adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural cell adhesion molecule 2 isoform X1
neural cell adhesion molecule 2 isoform X2
neural cell adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural cell adhesion molecule 2 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
microRNA 155; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L39, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L39, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 179 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L39, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 78 samples with support for all annotated introns
39S ribosomal protein L39, mitochondrial isoform X3
39S ribosomal protein L39, mitochondrial isoform X1
39S ribosomal protein L39, mitochondrial isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase peripheral stalk subunit F6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 173 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase peripheral stalk subunit F6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 176 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase peripheral stalk subunit F6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 180 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase-coupling factor 6, mitochondrial
GA binding protein transcription factor alpha subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 158 samples with support for all annotated introns
GA binding protein transcription factor alpha subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 174 samples with support for all annotated introns
GA binding protein transcription factor alpha subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
amyloid beta precursor protein, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 171 samples with support for all annotated introns
amyloid beta precursor protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 144 samples with support for all annotated introns
amyloid beta precursor protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 171 samples with support for all annotated introns
amyloid beta precursor protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 174 samples with support for all annotated introns
amyloid beta precursor protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 174 samples with support for all annotated introns
amyloid beta precursor protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 147 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106782607, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106782607, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: cysteine and tyrosine-rich protein 1
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 1
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 5
N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 148 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 136 samples with support for all annotated introns
hemK methyltransferase family member 2 isoform X1
hemK methyltransferase family member 2 isoform X2
hemK methyltransferase family member 2 isoform X3
hemK methyltransferase family member 2 isoform X4
N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X5
hemK methyltransferase family member 2 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 116 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 2B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 2B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 2B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 110 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 2B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 16, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 108 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 16, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 16, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 16, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 142 samples with support for all annotated introns
microRNA 9027; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 178 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111770777, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111770777, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
MAP3K7 C-terminal like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
MAP3K7 C-terminal-like protein isoform X1
MAP3K7 C-terminal like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
MAP3K7 C-terminal like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
MAP3K7 C-terminal like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
MAP3K7 C-terminal-like protein isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC102149344, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102149344, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102149344, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102149344, transcript variant X3
BTB domain and CNC homolog 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 150 samples with support for all annotated introns
BTB domain and CNC homolog 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 1, transcript variant X5
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform X4
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform X3
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform X8
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform X1
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform X7
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform X5
glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform X2
glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: keratin-associated protein 23-1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: keratin-associated protein 23-1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 44% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
T cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
T cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1, transcript variant X3
T cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
T cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
T cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
T cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1, transcript variant X4
T cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
T cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis-inducing protein 1 isoform X2
T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis-inducing protein 1 isoform X1
T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis-inducing protein 1 isoform X4
T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis-inducing protein 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: uncharacterized protein LOC111770753
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
superoxide dismutase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001081826.3
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SR-related CTD associated factor 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 105 samples with support for all annotated introns
SR-related CTD associated factor 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 105 samples with support for all annotated introns
splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 15 isoform X2
splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 15 isoform X1
hormonally up-regulated Neu-associated kinase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
hormonally up-regulated Neu-associated kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
hormonally up-regulated neu tumor-associated kinase isoform X1
hormonally up-regulated neu tumor-associated kinase isoform X2
MIS18 kinetochore protein A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
MIS18 kinetochore protein A, transcript variant X2
melanocortin 2 receptor accessory protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
melanocortin-2 receptor accessory protein isoform X2
melanocortin 2 receptor accessory protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
melanocortin-2 receptor accessory protein isoform X1
URB1 ribosome biogenesis 1 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 97 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleolar pre-ribosomal-associated protein 1
URB1 ribosome biogenesis 1 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 98 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 111 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 110 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 110 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 26 C21orf59 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 175 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 26 C21orf59 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
UPF0769 protein C21orf59 homolog isoform X1
UPF0769 protein C21orf59 homolog isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 148 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 105 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C21orf62 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
interferon alpha and beta receptor subunit 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon alpha and beta receptor subunit 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 129 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon alpha and beta receptor subunit 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon alpha and beta receptor subunit 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 129 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon alpha/beta receptor 2 isoform X1
interferon alpha/beta receptor 2 isoform X2
interferon alpha/beta receptor 2 isoform X3
interleukin 10 receptor subunit beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 170 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 10 receptor subunit beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 109 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 10 receptor subunit beta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin-10 receptor subunit beta isoform X1
interleukin-10 receptor subunit beta isoform X2
interleukin-10 receptor subunit beta isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC102150829, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102150829, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102150829, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102150829, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102150829, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102150829, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 81 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102150829, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 104 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon alpha and beta receptor subunit 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 163 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 50B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 157 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 50B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 50B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 50B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 50B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 50B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 50B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C28; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C28, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 163 samples with support for all annotated introns
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C28
dnaJ homolog subfamily C member 28 isoform X1
phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase, phosphoribosylglycinamide synthetase, phosphoribosylaminoimidazole synthetase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 167 samples with support for all annotated introns
trifunctional purine biosynthetic protein adenosine-3
SON DNA binding protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 179 samples with support for all annotated introns
SON DNA binding protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 179 samples with support for all annotated introns
SON DNA binding protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 168 samples with support for all annotated introns
SON DNA binding protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 171 samples with support for all annotated introns
SON DNA binding protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 175 samples with support for all annotated introns
downstream neighbor of SON, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
downstream neighbor of SON, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 112 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
crystallin zeta like 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin zeta like 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin zeta like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 170 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin zeta like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 107 samples with support for all annotated introns
quinone oxidoreductase-like protein 1 isoform X10
quinone oxidoreductase-like protein 1 isoform X8
quinone oxidoreductase-like protein 1 isoform X2
quinone oxidoreductase-like protein 1 isoform X1
crystallin zeta like 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 170 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin zeta like 1, transcript variant X5
crystallin zeta like 1, transcript variant X4
quinone oxidoreductase-like protein 1 isoform X7
quinone oxidoreductase-like protein 1 isoform X5
quinone oxidoreductase-like protein 1 isoform X4
crystallin zeta like 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
quinone oxidoreductase-like protein 1 isoform X9
crystallin zeta like 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin zeta like 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
quinone oxidoreductase-like protein 1 isoform X6
quinone oxidoreductase-like protein 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase peripheral stalk subunit OSCP
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 180 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
solute carrier family 5 member 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 5 member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 156 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 5 member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 5 member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter isoform X1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E regulatory subunit 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 2
small integral membrane protein 11A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 170 samples with support for all annotated introns
small integral membrane protein 11A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
small integral membrane protein 11A, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized protein C21orf140 homolog
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E regulatory subunit 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E regulatory subunit 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E regulatory subunit 1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 28% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
regulator of calcineurin 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 152 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of calcineurin 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 134 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel protein 6 isoform X1
chloride intracellular channel protein 6 isoform X2
runt related transcription factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
runt related transcription factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
runt related transcription factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
runt-related transcription factor 1 isoform X2
runt-related transcription factor 1 isoform X3
runt-related transcription factor 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
microRNA 802; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC106782638, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106782638, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC106782638, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106782638, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC106782638, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106782638, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC106782638, transcript variant X6
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X3
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X7
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X9
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 81 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform X4
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 170 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111770802, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111770802, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111770802, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
carbonyl reductase [NADPH] 3, transcript variant X2
carbonyl reductase [NADPH] 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 82 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111770802, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111770802, transcript variant X5
dopey family member 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 82 samples with support for all annotated introns
dopey family member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 111 samples with support for all annotated introns
dopey family member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 120 samples with support for all annotated introns
dopey family member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 155 samples with support for all annotated introns
MORC family CW-type zinc finger protein 3 isoform X1
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
MORC family CW-type zinc finger protein 3 isoform X2
chromatin assembly factor 1 subunit B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 109 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromatin assembly factor 1 subunit B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102148353, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102148353, transcript variant X1
single-minded family bHLH transcription factor 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 105 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class P, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class P, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 173 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class P, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 158 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class P, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 101 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class P, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase subunit P isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase subunit P isoform X2
phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase subunit P isoform X3
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 105 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X4
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X2
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X3
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X4
microRNA 9029; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DSCR3 arrestin fold containing, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 169 samples with support for all annotated introns
DSCR3 arrestin fold containing, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
Down syndrome critical region protein 3 isoform X2
Down syndrome critical region protein 3 isoform X1
dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 131 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 131 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 166 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 168 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A isoform X1
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A isoform X2
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A isoform X3
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC111770809, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111770809, transcript variant X1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily J member 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-activated inward rectifier potassium channel 2
endoplasmic reticulum export factor CTAGE5-like
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily J member 15, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily J member 15, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily J member 15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily J member 15, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily J member 15, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-sensitive inward rectifier potassium channel 15
uncharacterized LOC111770812, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111770812, transcript variant X2
ERG, ETS transcription factor, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
ERG, ETS transcription factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
ERG, ETS transcription factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
ERG, ETS transcription factor, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ERG, ETS transcription factor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
ERG, ETS transcription factor, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 84 samples with support for all annotated introns
ERG, ETS transcription factor, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ERG, ETS transcription factor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcriptional regulator ERG isoform X4
transcriptional regulator ERG isoform X1
transcriptional regulator ERG isoform X2
transcriptional regulator ERG isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC111770814, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111770814, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111770814, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111770814, transcript variant X1
ETS proto-oncogene 2, transcription factor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 154 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00003
uncharacterized LOC111770815, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111770815, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111770815, transcript variant X1
proteasome assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant X7
proteasome assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant X8
proteasome assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant X5
proteasome assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant X4
proteasome assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant X3
proteasome assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant X2
proteasome assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant X6
proteasome assembly chaperone 1 isoform X2
proteasome assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant X1
proteasome assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 159 samples with support for all annotated introns
proteasome assembly chaperone 1 isoform X3
proteasome assembly chaperone 1 isoform X1
bromodomain and WD repeat domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
bromodomain and WD repeat-containing protein 1 isoform X3
bromodomain and WD repeat domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 78 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and WD repeat domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and WD repeat-containing protein 1 isoform X2
bromodomain and WD repeat-containing protein 1 isoform X1
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 177 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 174 samples with support for all annotated introns
tail-anchored protein insertion receptor WRB
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X3
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X14
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X11
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X7
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X18
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X15
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X9
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X12
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X8
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X6
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X10
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X21
LCA5L, lebercilin like, transcript variant X22
SH3 domain binding glutamate rich protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 77 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain binding glutamate rich protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich protein isoform X1
SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich protein isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 5 isoform X1
immunoglobulin superfamily member 5 isoform X2
immunoglobulin superfamily member 5 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111770827, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111770827, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111770827, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111770827, transcript variant X2
beta-site APP-cleaving enzyme 2, transcript variant X2
beta-site APP-cleaving enzyme 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 117 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 3 member B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 3 member B, transcript variant X1
family with sequence similarity 3 member B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 3 member B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx2
MX dynamin like GTPase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
MX dynamin like GTPase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 69 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 127 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001082492.1
The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001075961.1
The RefSeq protein has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx1
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx1 isoform X1
transmembrane protease, serine 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protease, serine 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protease, serine 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
receptor interacting serine/threonine kinase 4, transcript variant X2
receptor interacting serine/threonine kinase 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 4 isoform X2
receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 4 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
PR domain zinc finger protein 15 isoform X2
PR domain zinc finger protein 15 isoform X1
PR domain zinc finger protein 15 isoform X3
C2 calcium dependent domain containing 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 21, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 143 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 21, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 21, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 21, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 21, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 21 isoform X2
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 21 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111770779, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111770779, transcript variant X2
ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 1, transcript variant X3
ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 97 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1 isoform X1
ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1 isoform X2
ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated and SH3 domain containing A, transcript variant X1
ubiquitin associated and SH3 domain containing A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ubiquitin-associated and SH3 domain-containing protein A isoform X1
ubiquitin-associated and SH3 domain-containing protein A isoform X2
radial spoke head 1 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
radial spoke head 1 homolog, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 37 member 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 37 member 1, transcript variant X6
solute carrier family 37 member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 37 member 1, transcript variant X1
solute carrier family 37 member 1, transcript variant X11
solute carrier family 37 member 1, transcript variant X12
solute carrier family 37 member 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 37 member 1, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 37 member 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 37 member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 84 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 37 member 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 37 member 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
glucose-6-phosphate exchanger SLC37A1 isoform X1
glucose-6-phosphate exchanger SLC37A1 isoform X3
glucose-6-phosphate exchanger SLC37A1 isoform X2
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 96 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 112 samples with support for all annotated introns
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform X1
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform X2
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform X3
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform X4
WD repeat domain 4, transcript variant X2
WD repeat domain 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 131 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 77 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA (guanine-N(7)-)-methyltransferase non-catalytic subunit WDR4 isoform X2
tRNA (guanine-N(7)-)-methyltransferase non-catalytic subunit WDR4 isoform X1
tRNA (guanine-N(7)-)-methyltransferase non-catalytic subunit WDR4 isoform X3
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit V3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 3, mitochondrial isoform X3
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit V3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 180 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit V3, transcript variant X4
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit V3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 105 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 3, mitochondrial isoform X1
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 3, mitochondrial isoform X4
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 3, mitochondrial isoform X2
PBX/knotted 1 homeobox 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 112 samples with support for all annotated introns
PBX/knotted 1 homeobox 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 112 samples with support for all annotated introns
PBX/knotted 1 homeobox 1, transcript variant X4
PBX/knotted 1 homeobox 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 172 samples with support for all annotated introns
U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 173 samples with support for all annotated introns
U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 146 samples with support for all annotated introns
splicing factor U2AF 35 kDa subunit isoform X2
splicing factor U2AF 35 kDa subunit isoform X1
U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 101 samples with support for all annotated introns
splicing factor U2AF 35 kDa subunit isoform X3
cystathionine beta-synthase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
cystathionine beta-synthase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
cystathionine beta-synthase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
cystathionine beta-synthase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin alpha A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC111770834, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111770834, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock transcription factor 2 binding protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock transcription factor 2 binding protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock transcription factor 2 binding protein, transcript variant X4
heat shock transcription factor 2 binding protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock transcription factor 2 binding protein, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock transcription factor 2 binding protein, transcript variant X5
heat shock transcription factor 2 binding protein, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock factor 2-binding protein isoform X1
heat shock factor 2-binding protein isoform X2
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00066
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 135 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal RNA processing protein 1 homolog B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 177 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 177 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 177 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal RNA processing 1, transcript variant X1
ribosomal RNA processing 1, transcript variant X2
ribosomal RNA processing 1, transcript variant X4
ribosomal RNA processing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 170 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal RNA processing protein 1 homolog A isoform X2
ribosomal RNA processing protein 1 homolog A isoform X4
ribosomal RNA processing protein 1 homolog A isoform X1
ribosomal RNA processing protein 1 homolog A isoform X3
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 151 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102150889, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102150889, transcript variant X2
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase gamma
trafficking protein particle complex 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 143 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 10 isoform X1
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 10 isoform X2
PWP2, small subunit processome component
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 112 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 26 C21orf33 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 26 C21orf33 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 171 samples with support for all annotated introns
ES1 protein homolog, mitochondrial isoform X2
ES1 protein homolog, mitochondrial isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC102150954, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102150954, transcript variant X2
inducible T cell costimulator ligand, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
inducible T cell costimulator ligand, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 128 samples with support for all annotated introns
inducible T cell costimulator ligand, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 88 samples with support for all annotated introns
inducible T cell costimulator ligand, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 143 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 167 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-dependent 6-phosphofructokinase, liver type
chromosome 26 C21orf2 homolog, transcript variant X1
chromosome 26 C21orf2 homolog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 103 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 26 C21orf2 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 26 C21orf2 homolog, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 140 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2, transcript variant X10
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2, transcript variant X3
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2, transcript variant X8
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2 isoform X1
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2 isoform X2
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2 isoform X4
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2, transcript variant X9
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2 isoform X3
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00285
microRNA 9028; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 3
thrombospondin type laminin G domain and EAR repeats
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
thrombospondin-type laminin G domain and EAR repeat-containing protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 G2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 174 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 G2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 G2, transcript variant X3
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 G2 isoform X2
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 G2 isoform X1
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 G2 isoform X3
small ubiquitin-like modifier 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
small ubiquitin-like modifier 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 177 samples with support for all annotated introns
small ubiquitin-related modifier 3 isoform X1
small ubiquitin-related modifier 3 isoform X2
microRNA 9023; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 9025; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
integrin subunit beta 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrin subunit beta 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrin subunit beta 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 130 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 90 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 207 member A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 207 member A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 137 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 207 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 170 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 207 member A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase, RNA specific B1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase, RNA specific B1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase, RNA specific B1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase, RNA specific B1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase, RNA specific B1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
double-stranded RNA-specific editase 1 isoform X1
double-stranded RNA-specific editase 1 isoform X3
double-stranded RNA-specific editase 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 173 samples with support for all annotated introns
GDP-fucose protein O-fucosyltransferase 2
collagen type XVIII alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 89 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain isoform X5
microRNA 9026; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collagen type XVIII alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type XVIII alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type XVIII alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type XVIII alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain isoform X1
collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain isoform X2
collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain isoform X3
collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain isoform X4
solute carrier family 19 member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 88 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 19 member 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 19 member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 19 member 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 19 member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 19 member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 19 member 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111770847, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111770847, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC111770847 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC111770847 isoform X1
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X8
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X6
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X14
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X15
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X16
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X17
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X18
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X19
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X2
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X4
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 136 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type VI alpha 2 chain, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 117 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type VI alpha 2 chain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 139 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type VI alpha 2 chain, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 119 samples with support for all annotated introns
formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase, transcript variant X3
formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
formimidoyltransferase-cyclodeaminase isoform X3
formimidoyltransferase-cyclodeaminase isoform X2
formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase, transcript variant X1
formimidoyltransferase-cyclodeaminase isoform X1
spermatogenesis and centriole associated 1 like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
lanosterol synthase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 112 samples with support for all annotated introns
lanosterol synthase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
lanosterol synthase, transcript variant X3
lanosterol synthase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 91 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 associated protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 168 samples with support for all annotated introns
minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 associated protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 127 samples with support for all annotated introns
germinal-center associated nuclear protein isoform X1
germinal-center associated nuclear protein isoform X2
minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 associated protein, transcript variant X3
germinal-center associated nuclear protein isoform X3
ybeY metallopeptidase (putative), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 151 samples with support for all annotated introns
ybeY metallopeptidase (putative), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 162 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 26 C21orf58 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C21orf58 homolog isoform X2
chromosome 26 C21orf58 homolog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 26 C21orf58 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C21orf58 homolog isoform X3
uncharacterized protein C21orf58 homolog isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X17
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X12
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X6
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X13
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X14
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X9
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X10
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X1
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 77 samples with support for all annotated introns
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X5
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X2
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 114 samples with support for all annotated introns
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X7
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X8
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X1
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X3
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X5
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X10
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X2
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X4
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X7
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X8
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X6
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X11
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X13
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X11
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X9
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X16
disco interacting protein 2 homolog A, transcript variant X15
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X6
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 104 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X7
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 163 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 166 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 2 isoform X1
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 2 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: aryl hydrocarbon receptor-like