Balaenoptera musculus isolate JJ_BM4_2016_0621 chromosome Y, mBalMus1.pri.v3, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Laurasiatheria; Artiodactyla; Whippomorpha; Cetacea; Mysticeti; Balaenopteridae; Balaenoptera.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM020963.2.\nAssembly name: mBalMus1.pri.v3\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the G10K on 2020/10/02. The\noriginal whole-genome shotgun project has the accession\nVNFC00000000.3.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: G10K\nAssembly Date :: 25-OCT-2019\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 1.0.2; FALCON-Unzip v. 1.0.2;\n purge_haplotigs v. bitbucket 7.10.2018;\n scaff10x v. git 4.28.2018; Bionano Solve\n DLS v. 3.2.1; Salsa2 HiC v. 2.0; Arrow\n polishing and gap filling v. 5.1.0.26412;\n longranger align v. 2.2.2; freebayes v.\n 1.2.0; gEVAL manual curation v.\n 2019-10-25; VGP standard assembly\n pipeline v. 1.5; Additional Purge_dup and\n Polish v. 2020-05-28\nAssembly Name :: mBalMus1.pri.v3\nDiploid :: Principal pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: No\nGenome Coverage :: 51.16x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel I; Illumina NovaSeq; 10X\n Genomics chromium; Dovetail Genomics HiC\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Balaenoptera musculus Annotation\n Release 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.5\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Jeff K. Jacobsen, Susanne Meyer, Li-Fang Chu, Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X5
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X6
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X4
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X3
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X2
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X1
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X5
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein auxiliary factor 35 kDa subunit-related protein 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein auxiliary factor 35 kDa subunit-related protein 2-like isoform X1
U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein auxiliary factor 35 kDa subunit-related protein 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein auxiliary factor 35 kDa subunit-related protein 2-like isoform X2
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X7
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X5
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X6
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X11
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X10
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X1
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X8
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X3
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X7
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X5
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X4
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X6
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X2
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X10
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X9
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X9
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein-like, transcript variant X2
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein-like, transcript variant X3
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein-like isoform X1
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein-like isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 3, Y-linked-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 3, Y-linked-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 31% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 41 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal-like isoform X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 8% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ly6/PLAUR domain-containing protein 6B
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: amelogenin, Y isoform-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA aspartic acid (anticodon GUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
testis-specific Y-encoded protein 4-like, transcript variant X3
testis-specific Y-encoded protein 4-like, transcript variant X1
testis-specific Y-encoded protein 4-like, transcript variant X5
testis-specific Y-encoded protein 4-like, transcript variant X4
testis-specific Y-encoded protein 4-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
testis-specific Y-encoded protein 4-like isoform X1
testis-specific Y-encoded protein 4-like isoform X2
testis-specific Y-encoded protein 4-like isoform X4
testis-specific Y-encoded protein 4-like isoform X5
testis-specific Y-encoded protein 4-like isoform X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: H(+)/Cl(-) exchange transporter 4-like
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00015
RNA-binding motif protein, X chromosome-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 Proteins, and 9% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments