Balaenoptera musculus isolate JJ_BM4_2016_0621 chromosome 21, mBalMus1.pri.v3, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Laurasiatheria; Artiodactyla; Whippomorpha; Cetacea; Mysticeti; Balaenopteridae; Balaenoptera.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM020961.2.\nAssembly name: mBalMus1.pri.v3\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the G10K on 2020/10/02. The\noriginal whole-genome shotgun project has the accession\nVNFC00000000.3.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: G10K\nAssembly Date :: 25-OCT-2019\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 1.0.2; FALCON-Unzip v. 1.0.2;\n purge_haplotigs v. bitbucket 7.10.2018;\n scaff10x v. git 4.28.2018; Bionano Solve\n DLS v. 3.2.1; Salsa2 HiC v. 2.0; Arrow\n polishing and gap filling v. 5.1.0.26412;\n longranger align v. 2.2.2; freebayes v.\n 1.2.0; gEVAL manual curation v.\n 2019-10-25; VGP standard assembly\n pipeline v. 1.5; Additional Purge_dup and\n Polish v. 2020-05-28\nAssembly Name :: mBalMus1.pri.v3\nDiploid :: Principal pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: No\nGenome Coverage :: 51.16x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel I; Illumina NovaSeq; 10X\n Genomics chromium; Dovetail Genomics HiC\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Balaenoptera musculus Annotation\n Release 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.5\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Jeff K. Jacobsen, Susanne Meyer, Li-Fang Chu, Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein CEBPZOS-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00004
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00099
aspartylglucosaminidase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
aspartylglucosaminidase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
N(4)-(beta-N-acetylglucosaminyl)-L-asparaginase isoform X1
N(4)-(beta-N-acetylglucosaminyl)-L-asparaginase isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 5 isoform X1
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 5 isoform X2
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 5 isoform X3
spermatogenesis associated 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis-associated protein 4 isoform X1
spermatogenesis associated 4, transcript variant X2
spermatogenesis-associated protein 4 isoform X2
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X3
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X2
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X1
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X4
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00425
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuronal membrane glycoprotein M6-a isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuronal membrane glycoprotein M6-a isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118887852, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118887852, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: sperm-associated antigen 11B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X4
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X3
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X11
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X13
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X6
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X9
zinc finger protein 705A-like isoform X1
zinc finger protein 705A-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
family with sequence similarity 90 member A26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase epsilon isoform X2
1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase epsilon isoform X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein SEC13 homolog
uncharacterized LOC118887735, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118887735, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118887735, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA tryptophan (anticodon CCA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CUB and sushi domain-containing protein 1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch repeat and BTB domain containing 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch repeat and BTB domain containing 11, transcript variant X2
kelch repeat and BTB domain-containing protein 11
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X2
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X5
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X11
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X2
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X5
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X6
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X3
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X4
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X1
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X9
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X8
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X8
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X7
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X7
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X10
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X10
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon CUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00156
cyclin-dependent kinases regulatory subunit 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X13
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X7
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X8
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X10
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X9
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X12
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X11
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X6
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X5
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X4
DLG associated protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DLG associated protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
disks large-associated protein 2 isoform X1
disks large-associated protein 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
testis development related protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
testis development related protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
testis development-related protein isoform X1
testis development related protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
testis development-related protein isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC118887930, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118887930, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein 596
WW and C2 domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
WW and C2 domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
WW and C2 domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
WW and C2 domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 60% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC118887996, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118887996, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC118888038, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118888038, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118888038, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
RWD domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
RWD domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
trafficking protein particle complex 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 11 isoform X1
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 11 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 6, transcript variant X3
glycerophosphocholine cholinephosphodiesterase ENPP6 isoform X1
glycerophosphocholine cholinephosphodiesterase ENPP6 isoform X3
ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 6, transcript variant X2
glycerophosphocholine cholinephosphodiesterase ENPP6 isoform X2
interferon regulatory factor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon regulatory factor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118887876, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118887876, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118887876, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC118887876, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC118887876, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC118887876, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC118887876, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X2
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X9
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X10
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X1
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X2
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X4
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X5
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X3
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X11
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X6
centromere protein U, transcript variant X3
centromere protein U, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein U, transcript variant X4
centromere protein U, transcript variant X5
centromere protein U, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein U, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 1, transcript variant X2
acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase 1 isoform X2
long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins
helt bHLH transcription factor, transcript variant X1
helt bHLH transcription factor, transcript variant X2
hairy and enhancer of split-related protein HELT isoform X1
hairy and enhancer of split-related protein HELT isoform X2
transfer RNA glycine (anticodon UCC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: beta-citrylglutamate synthase B-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 97, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 97, transcript variant X3
cilia and flagella associated protein 97, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 97 isoform X2
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 97 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 37
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 21 C4orf47 homolog, transcript variant X3
chromosome 21 C4orf47 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 21 C4orf47 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 Proteins, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
UPF0602 protein C4orf47 homolog isoform X2
UPF0602 protein C4orf47 homolog isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 110
PDZ and LIM domain 3, transcript variant X2
PDZ and LIM domain 3, transcript variant X3
PDZ and LIM domain 3, transcript variant X1
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X21
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X12
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X20
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X7
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X14
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X10
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X18
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X8
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X19
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X17
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X6
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X16
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X13
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X9
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X15
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X22
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X11
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X25
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X23
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X30
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X26
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X28
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X29
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X8
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X6
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X23
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X12
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X24
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X13
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X20
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X19
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X11
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X22
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X18
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X10
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X17
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X7
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X5
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X15
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X9
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X14
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X21
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X16
toll like receptor 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
toll like receptor 3, transcript variant X5
toll like receptor 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
toll like receptor 3, transcript variant X4
toll like receptor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 5 long SRA reads, 39 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
toll like receptor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
toll like receptor 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 149 member A
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00322
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
coagulation factor XI, transcript variant X1
coagulation factor XI, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coagulation factor XI, transcript variant X2
coagulation factor XI, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
coagulation factor XI, transcript variant X5
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X5
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118887928, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118887928, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118887728, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118887728, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC118887728, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC118887728, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIML2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIML1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 60% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-acylsphingosine amidohydrolase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-acylsphingosine amidohydrolase 1, transcript variant X2
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X4
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X13
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X2
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X12
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X8
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X7
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X3
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X9
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X5
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X1
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X10
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X6
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X11
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X18
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X17
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X16
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X14
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X20
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X7
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X21
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X17
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X20
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X16
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X15
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X13
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X19
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X14
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X12
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X18
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X9
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X6
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X5
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X2
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X10
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X8
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X4
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X3
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X1
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X11
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X24
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X22
fibrinogen like 1, transcript variant X1
fibrinogen like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X3
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X2
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 isoform X1
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 isoform X2
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 isoform X3
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 isoform X4
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 isoform X5
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00619
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X9
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 isoform X6
platelet derived growth factor receptor like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
platelet-derived growth factor receptor-like protein
solute carrier family 7 member 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 7 member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 7 member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 7 member 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 7 member 2, transcript variant X3
cationic amino acid transporter 2 isoform X2
cationic amino acid transporter 2 isoform X1
myotubularin related protein 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 7 isoform X2
myotubularin related protein 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 7, transcript variant X4
myotubularin-related protein 7 isoform X1
myotubularin-related protein 7 isoform X4
myotubularin related protein 7, transcript variant X3
myotubularin-related protein 7 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 37A
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 7, transcript variant X2
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 7 isoform X1
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 7 isoform X2
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 2, transcript variant X4
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 2, transcript variant X1
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mitochondrial calcium uptake family member 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 24% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X1
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X9
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X1
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X3
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X8
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X6
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X5
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X7
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X3
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X4
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins
tumor suppressor candidate 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tumor suppressor candidate 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor suppressor candidate 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 12 Proteins, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DLC1 Rho GTPase activating protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DLC1 Rho GTPase activating protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 29 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DLC1 Rho GTPase activating protein, transcript variant X10
DLC1 Rho GTPase activating protein, transcript variant X11
DLC1 Rho GTPase activating protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DLC1 Rho GTPase activating protein, transcript variant X4
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X1
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X3
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X2
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X8
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X9
DLC1 Rho GTPase activating protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 28 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X4
DLC1 Rho GTPase activating protein, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X5
DLC1 Rho GTPase activating protein, transcript variant X9
DLC1 Rho GTPase activating protein, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X6
DLC1 Rho GTPase activating protein, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tRNA methyltransferase 9B (putative), transcript variant X2
tRNA methyltransferase 9B (putative), transcript variant X1
tRNA methyltransferase 9B (putative), transcript variant X3
probable tRNA methyltransferase 9B isoform X1
probable tRNA methyltransferase 9B isoform X2
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 1, transcript variant X4
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and RING finger protein 1 isoform X1
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and RING finger protein 1 isoform X2
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and RING finger protein 1 isoform X3
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and RING finger protein 1 isoform X4
PEAK1 related, kinase-activating pseudokinase 1, transcript variant X2
PEAK1 related, kinase-activating pseudokinase 1, transcript variant X1
PEAK1 related, kinase-activating pseudokinase 1, transcript variant X3
inactive tyrosine-protein kinase PRAG1 isoform X3
inactive tyrosine-protein kinase PRAG1 isoform X2
inactive tyrosine-protein kinase PRAG1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
prolow-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
malignant fibrous histiocytoma amplified sequence 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
malignant fibrous histiocytoma amplified sequence 1, transcript variant X2
malignant fibrous histiocytoma-amplified sequence 1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00408
exoribonuclease 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
exoribonuclease 1, transcript variant X1
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B isoform X1
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase tankyrase-1 isoform X1
poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase tankyrase-1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
store-operated calcium entry associated regulatory factor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
store-operated calcium entry-associated regulatory factor
leptin receptor overlapping transcript like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
leptin receptor overlapping transcript-like 1
membrane bound O-acyltransferase domain containing 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 8 Proteins
dynactin subunit 6, transcript variant X1
dynactin subunit 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X2
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X4
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X6
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X1
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X7
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X3
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X8
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X4
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X2
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X7
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X1
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X5
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X3
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
general transcription factor IIE subunit 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription initiation factor IIE subunit beta
small integral membrane protein 18, transcript variant X2
small integral membrane protein 18, transcript variant X1
small integral membrane protein 18, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain protein 8, transcript variant X1
UBX domain protein 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain-containing protein 8 isoform X1
UBX domain-containing protein 8 isoform X2
protein phosphatase 2 catalytic subunit beta
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 49 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit beta isoform
testis expressed 15, meiosis and synapsis associated
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: testis-expressed protein 15
purine rich element binding protein G, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
purine-rich element-binding protein gamma isoform X3
purine rich element binding protein G, transcript variant X2
purine-rich element-binding protein gamma isoform X2
purine rich element binding protein G, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
purine-rich element-binding protein gamma isoform X1
WRN RecQ like helicase, transcript variant X1
WRN RecQ like helicase, transcript variant X2
WRN RecQ like helicase, transcript variant X3
WRN RecQ like helicase, transcript variant X4
Werner syndrome ATP-dependent helicase isoform X1
Werner syndrome ATP-dependent helicase isoform X2
Werner syndrome ATP-dependent helicase isoform X3
Werner syndrome ATP-dependent helicase isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC118887858, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC118887858, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC118887858, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118887858, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: transcription factor Spi-C-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X6
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X5
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X7
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X2
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X1
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X3
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X8
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X9
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X11
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X12
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X4
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X10
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 10% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
fucosyltransferase 10, transcript variant X3
fucosyltransferase 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
fucosyltransferase 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: nuclear receptor coactivator 6-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01210
ring finger protein 122, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 122, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 26, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 26, transcript variant X3
dual specificity phosphatase 26, transcript variant X1
dual specificity protein phosphatase 26 isoform X2
dual specificity protein phosphatase 26 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: dnaJ homolog subfamily C member 14-like
potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily U member 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 27% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: MICOS complex subunit MIC27-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118887960, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118887960, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC118887960, transcript variant X1
ER lipid raft associated 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ER lipid raft associated 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ER lipid raft associated 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor A2, transcript variant X5
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor A2, transcript variant X1
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor A2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor A2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor A2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor A2 isoform X1
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor A2 isoform X5
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor A2 isoform X2
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor A2 isoform X3
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor A2 isoform X4
BRF2 RNA polymerase III transcription initiation factor subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor IIIB 50 kDa subunit
RAB11 family interacting protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB11 family interacting protein 1, transcript variant X1
RAB11 family interacting protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB11 family interacting protein 1, transcript variant X3
RAB11 family interacting protein 1, transcript variant X4
rab11 family-interacting protein 1 isoform X3
rab11 family-interacting protein 1 isoform X1
rab11 family-interacting protein 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 10% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1 like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 10% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
putative aspartate aminotransferase, cytoplasmic 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, and 12% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC118887903, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118887903, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
small integral membrane protein 19, transcript variant X1
small integral membrane protein 19, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
small integral membrane protein 19, transcript variant X5
small integral membrane protein 19, transcript variant X3
small integral membrane protein 19, transcript variant X7
small integral membrane protein 19, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
small integral membrane protein 19, transcript variant X2
small integral membrane protein 19 isoform X4
small integral membrane protein 19 isoform X1
small integral membrane protein 19 isoform X3
small integral membrane protein 19 isoform X2
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit beta-3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit beta-3, transcript variant X2
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit beta-3, transcript variant X3
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit beta-3
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-6-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
THAP domain-containing protein 1-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
THAP domain-containing protein 1-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
THAP domain-containing protein 1-like, transcript variant X4
THAP domain-containing protein 1-like, transcript variant X6
THAP domain-containing protein 1-like, transcript variant X1
THAP domain-containing protein 1-like, transcript variant X2
THAP domain-containing protein 1-like isoform X2
THAP domain-containing protein 1-like isoform X1
THAP domain-containing protein 1-like isoform X3
THAP domain-containing protein 1-like isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger matrin-type 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger matrin-type 4, transcript variant X2
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00001
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC118888088, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118888088, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118888087, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118888087, transcript variant X2
transcriptional and immune response regulator
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X4
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X5
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X3
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X2
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X5
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X4
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X1
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 18-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
A disintegrin and metallopeptidase domain 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 42% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 2
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 5-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 11% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 mRNAs, 69 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 8 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 9 isoform X2
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 9 isoform X1
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon CCU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
TM2 domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
TM2 domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 60% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 3 codons; substituted 3 bases at 3 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: serine protease HTRA4
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X3
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 2
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X7
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X13
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X12
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X11
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X4
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X3
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X6
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X5
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X2
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X1
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X13
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X9
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X7
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X12
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X11
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X8
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X4
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X3
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X6
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X5
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X2
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X1
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X10
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X10
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X4
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X1
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X2
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X3
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X6
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X7
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X5
leucine zipper and EF-hand containing transmembrane protein 2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 39% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: LETM1 domain-containing protein LETM2, mitochondrial
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X1
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X3
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X4
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X3
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X5
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X5
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X1
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X9
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X8
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X2
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X3
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X7
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X5
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X4
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X6
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
DDHD domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
DDHD domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
BAG family molecular chaperone regulator 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LSM1 homolog, mRNA degradation associated
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, mitochondrial
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X4
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X2
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X1
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
GINS complex subunit 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
GINS complex subunit 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DNA replication complex GINS protein SLD5
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4, transcript variant X2
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4 isoform X1
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4 isoform X2
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118887779, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118887779, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
plasminogen activator, tissue type, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
plasminogen activator, tissue type, transcript variant X2
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X1
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X5
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X2
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta isoform X1
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta isoform X2
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta isoform X3
DNA polymerase beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA polymerase beta, transcript variant X3
DNA polymerase beta, transcript variant X2
dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
voltage dependent anion channel 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage dependent anion channel 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage dependent anion channel 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage dependent anion channel 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3 isoform X1
voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3 isoform X2
solute carrier family 20 member 2, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 20 member 2, transcript variant X1
solute carrier family 20 member 2, transcript variant X2
sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 2 isoform X2
sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 2 isoform X1
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit beta-3-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-6-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
centrosomal protein of 78 kDa-like, transcript variant X5
centrosomal protein of 78 kDa-like, transcript variant X1
centrosomal protein of 78 kDa-like, transcript variant X2
centrosomal protein of 78 kDa-like, transcript variant X3
centrosomal protein of 78 kDa-like, transcript variant X4
centrosomal protein of 78 kDa-like, transcript variant X6
centrosomal protein of 78 kDa-like isoform X2
centrosomal protein of 78 kDa-like isoform X1
centrosomal protein of 78 kDa-like isoform X3
centrosomal protein of 78 kDa-like isoform X4
centrosomal protein of 78 kDa-like, transcript variant X7
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X4
PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X4
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein phosphatase 1F-like
uncharacterized LOC118888044, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118888044, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118887937, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118887937, transcript variant X1
SH2 domain containing 4A, transcript variant X3
SH2 domain containing 4A, transcript variant X1
SH2 domain containing 4A, transcript variant X2
SH2 domain-containing protein 4A isoform X1
SH2 domain-containing protein 4A isoform X2
SH2 domain-containing protein 4A isoform X3
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X5
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X8
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X9
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X3
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X1
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X3
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X2
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X4
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X1
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X2
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase isoform X1
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase isoform X2
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase isoform X3
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X1
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X2
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X3
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X7
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X8
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X9
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X4
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X6
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X5
farnesyltransferase, CAAX box, alpha, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
farnesyltransferase, CAAX box, alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein farnesyltransferase/geranylgeranyltransferase type-1 subunit alpha isoform X2
protein farnesyltransferase/geranylgeranyltransferase type-1 subunit alpha isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
hook microtubule tethering protein 3, transcript variant X1
hook microtubule tethering protein 3, transcript variant X2
hook microtubule tethering protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X2
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X1
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X5
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X6
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X7
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X8
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF170 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF170 isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF170 isoform X3
THAP domain-containing protein 1, transcript variant X1
THAP domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
THAP domain-containing protein 1, transcript variant X3
THAP domain-containing protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
THAP domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2