Balaenoptera musculus isolate JJ_BM4_2016_0621 chromosome 18, mBalMus1.pri.v3, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Laurasiatheria; Artiodactyla; Whippomorpha; Cetacea; Mysticeti; Balaenopteridae; Balaenoptera.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM020958.2.\nAssembly name: mBalMus1.pri.v3\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the G10K on 2020/10/02. The\noriginal whole-genome shotgun project has the accession\nVNFC00000000.3.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: G10K\nAssembly Date :: 25-OCT-2019\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 1.0.2; FALCON-Unzip v. 1.0.2;\n purge_haplotigs v. bitbucket 7.10.2018;\n scaff10x v. git 4.28.2018; Bionano Solve\n DLS v. 3.2.1; Salsa2 HiC v. 2.0; Arrow\n polishing and gap filling v. 5.1.0.26412;\n longranger align v. 2.2.2; freebayes v.\n 1.2.0; gEVAL manual curation v.\n 2019-10-25; VGP standard assembly\n pipeline v. 1.5; Additional Purge_dup and\n Polish v. 2020-05-28\nAssembly Name :: mBalMus1.pri.v3\nDiploid :: Principal pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: No\nGenome Coverage :: 51.16x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel I; Illumina NovaSeq; 10X\n Genomics chromium; Dovetail Genomics HiC\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Balaenoptera musculus Annotation\n Release 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.5\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Jeff K. Jacobsen, Susanne Meyer, Li-Fang Chu, Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
ATPase H+/K+ transporting non-gastric alpha2 subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
potassium-transporting ATPase alpha chain 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 59% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
centromere protein J, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein J, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein J, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein J, transcript variant X2
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP4
M-phase phosphoprotein 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
M-phase phosphoprotein 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
zinc finger MYM-type containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger MYM-type containing 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger MYM-type containing 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger MYM-type containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger MYM-type containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger MYM-type containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger MYM-type protein 2 isoform X1
zinc finger MYM-type protein 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein beta 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein beta 2, transcript variant X2
gap junction protein beta 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein beta 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein beta 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein beta 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00099
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
EEF1A lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
EEF1A lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
EEF1A lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
EEF1A lysine methyltransferase 1 isoform X2
EEF1A lysine methyltransferase 1 isoform X1
EEF1A lysine methyltransferase 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
large tumor suppressor kinase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
large tumor suppressor kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
large tumor suppressor kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 5 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP18
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3, transcript variant X2
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3, transcript variant X4
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
spindle and kinetochore-associated protein 3 isoform X1
spindle and kinetochore-associated protein 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 20, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 20, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 20, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118884446, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118884446, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118884104, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118884104, transcript variant X2
sarcoglycan gamma, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00004
sarcoglycan gamma, transcript variant X1
sacsin molecular chaperone, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sacsin molecular chaperone, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sacsin molecular chaperone, transcript variant X3
TNF receptor superfamily member 19, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor superfamily member 19, transcript variant X6
TNF receptor superfamily member 19, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor superfamily member 19, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor superfamily member 19, transcript variant X4
TNF receptor superfamily member 19, transcript variant X3
TNF receptor superfamily member 19, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 19 isoform X1
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 19 isoform X2
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 19 isoform X3
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 19 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
C1q and TNF related 9, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
C1q and TNF related 9, transcript variant X4
C1q and TNF related 9, transcript variant X1
C1q and TNF related 9, transcript variant X2
complement C1q and tumor necrosis factor-related protein 9A isoform X2
complement C1q and tumor necrosis factor-related protein 9A isoform X1
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant X5
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant X4
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant X1
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 isoform X3
spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 isoform X2
spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 isoform X1
spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 isoform X4
spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
myotubularin related protein 6, transcript variant X4
myotubularin related protein 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 6 isoform X4
myotubularin-related protein 6 isoform X2
myotubularin-related protein 6 isoform X3
myotubularin-related protein 6 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB, transcript variant X1
phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB isoform X1
phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB-like isoform X1
phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB-like, transcript variant X2
phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB-like isoform X2
phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB-like, transcript variant X3
phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB-like isoform X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF6
cyclin dependent kinase 8, transcript variant X3
cyclin dependent kinase 8, transcript variant X4
cyclin dependent kinase 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase 8, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
WASP family member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
WASP family member 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
WASP family member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
WASP family member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family member 3 isoform X1
wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family member 3 isoform X2
G protein-coupled receptor 12, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 20 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 12
ribosomal protein L21, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein L21, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein L21, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein L21, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00187
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00443
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
translation initiation factor IF-3, mitochondrial
ligand of numb-protein X 2, transcript variant X6
ligand of numb-protein X 2, transcript variant X3
ligand of numb-protein X 2, transcript variant X2
ligand of numb-protein X 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ligand of numb-protein X 2, transcript variant X4
ligand of numb-protein X 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ligand of numb-protein X 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA-directed RNA polymerases I and III subunit RPAC2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA tryptophan (anticodon CCA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 10 Proteins
ureidoimidazoline (2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-) decarboxylase, transcript variant X2
ureidoimidazoline (2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-) decarboxylase, transcript variant X3
ureidoimidazoline (2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-) decarboxylase, transcript variant X1
putative 2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-ureidoimidazoline decarboxylase isoform X2
putative 2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-ureidoimidazoline decarboxylase isoform X1
fms related receptor tyrosine kinase 3, transcript variant X2
fms related receptor tyrosine kinase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein kinase FLT3 isoform X2
receptor-type tyrosine-protein kinase FLT3 isoform X1
poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit PAN3, transcript variant X7
poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit PAN3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit PAN3, transcript variant X10
poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit PAN3, transcript variant X6
poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit PAN3, transcript variant X11
poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit PAN3, transcript variant X12
poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit PAN3, transcript variant X2
poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit PAN3, transcript variant X1
poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit PAN3, transcript variant X4
poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit PAN3, transcript variant X5
poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit PAN3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAN2-PAN3 deadenylation complex subunit PAN3 isoform X1
PAN2-PAN3 deadenylation complex subunit PAN3 isoform X2
PAN2-PAN3 deadenylation complex subunit PAN3 isoform X3
PAN2-PAN3 deadenylation complex subunit PAN3 isoform X4
PAN2-PAN3 deadenylation complex subunit PAN3 isoform X5
PAN2-PAN3 deadenylation complex subunit PAN3 isoform X6
PAN2-PAN3 deadenylation complex subunit PAN3 isoform X9
PAN2-PAN3 deadenylation complex subunit PAN3 isoform X7
poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit PAN3, transcript variant X8
PAN2-PAN3 deadenylation complex subunit PAN3 isoform X8
fms related receptor tyrosine kinase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 isoform X1
fms related receptor tyrosine kinase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: 60S ribosomal protein L29-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 3 codons; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: solute carrier family 46 member 3
microtubule associated scaffold protein 2, transcript variant X4
microtubule associated scaffold protein 2, transcript variant X1
microtubule associated scaffold protein 2, transcript variant X7
microtubule associated scaffold protein 2, transcript variant X3
microtubule associated scaffold protein 2, transcript variant X2
microtubule associated scaffold protein 2, transcript variant X5
microtubule associated scaffold protein 2, transcript variant X6
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor candidate 2 isoform X1
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor candidate 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
microtubule associated scaffold protein 2, transcript variant X9
microtubule associated scaffold protein 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor candidate 2 isoform X3
solute carrier family 7 member 1, transcript variant X4
solute carrier family 7 member 1, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 7 member 1, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 7 member 1, transcript variant X1
solute carrier family 7 member 1, transcript variant X5
solute carrier family 7 member 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
high affinity cationic amino acid transporter 1 isoform X4
high affinity cationic amino acid transporter 1 isoform X3
high affinity cationic amino acid transporter 1 isoform X2
high affinity cationic amino acid transporter 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
katanin catalytic subunit A1 like 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
katanin catalytic subunit A1 like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
katanin catalytic subunit A1 like 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
katanin catalytic subunit A1 like 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
katanin catalytic subunit A1 like 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
katanin catalytic subunit A1 like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 1 isoform X1
katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 1 isoform X2
katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 1 isoform X3
katanin catalytic subunit A1 like 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 1 isoform X4
high mobility group box 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group box 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 mRNAs, 7 long SRA reads, 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group box 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ubiquitin specific peptidase like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase like 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase like 1, transcript variant X4
ubiquitin specific peptidase like 1, transcript variant X3
ubiquitin specific peptidase like 1, transcript variant X1
SUMO-specific isopeptidase USPL1 isoform X1
SUMO-specific isopeptidase USPL1 isoform X3
SUMO-specific isopeptidase USPL1 isoform X2
SUMO-specific isopeptidase USPL1 isoform X4
ubiquitin specific peptidase like 1, transcript variant X6
SUMO-specific isopeptidase USPL1 isoform X5
transfer RNA asparagine (anticodon GUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase activating protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein
mesenteric estrogen dependent adipogenesis
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
mesenteric estrogen-dependent adipogenesis protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
testis expressed 26, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
testis expressed 26, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
WD repeat-containing protein on Y chromosome-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: WD repeat-containing protein on Y chromosome-like
heat shock protein family H (Hsp110) member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock protein family H (Hsp110) member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock protein family H (Hsp110) member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock protein family H (Hsp110) member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta 3-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X2
beta 3-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X3
beta 3-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta 3-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X7
beta 3-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X8
beta 3-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X5
beta 3-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X6
beta 3-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
FRY microtubule binding protein, transcript variant X8
FRY microtubule binding protein, transcript variant X3
FRY microtubule binding protein, transcript variant X9
FRY microtubule binding protein, transcript variant X1
FRY microtubule binding protein, transcript variant X4
FRY microtubule binding protein, transcript variant X2
FRY microtubule binding protein, transcript variant X5
FRY microtubule binding protein, transcript variant X7
FRY microtubule binding protein, transcript variant X6
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00151
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
BRCA2 DNA repair associated, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
BRCA2 DNA repair associated, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein isoform X1
breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein isoform X2
NEDD4 binding protein 2 like 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4 binding protein 2 like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4 binding protein 2 like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 1 isoform X1
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 1 isoform X2
NEDD4 binding protein 2 like 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 1 isoform X3
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 1 isoform X4
small nucleolar RNA SNORA16B/SNORA16A family
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00190
NEDD4 binding protein 2 like 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 1 isoform X5
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2
PDS5 cohesin associated factor B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
PDS5 cohesin associated factor B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
PDS5 cohesin associated factor B, transcript variant X5
PDS5 cohesin associated factor B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
PDS5 cohesin associated factor B, transcript variant X3
PDS5 cohesin associated factor B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins
sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B isoform X1
sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B isoform X2
sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B isoform X5
sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B isoform X3
sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B isoform X4
sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B isoform X6
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
uncharacterized LOC118884438, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118884438, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118884438, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC118884438, transcript variant X4
StAR related lipid transfer domain containing 13, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
StAR related lipid transfer domain containing 13, transcript variant X2
StAR related lipid transfer domain containing 13, transcript variant X5
StAR related lipid transfer domain containing 13, transcript variant X1
StAR related lipid transfer domain containing 13, transcript variant X4
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform X1
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform X2
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform X3
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform X4
replication factor C subunit 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
replication factor C subunit 3, transcript variant X3
replication factor C subunit 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 36% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC118883943, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118883943, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
doublecortin like kinase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
doublecortin like kinase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK1 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK1 isoform X5
doublecortin like kinase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
doublecortin like kinase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK1 isoform X3
serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK1 isoform X2
doublecortin like kinase 1, transcript variant X4
serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK1 isoform X4
doublecortin like kinase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK1 isoform X6
spermatogenesis and oogenesis specific basic helix-loop-helix 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis and oogenesis specific basic helix-loop-helix 2, transcript variant X4
spermatogenesis and oogenesis specific basic helix-loop-helix 2, transcript variant X3
spermatogenesis and oogenesis specific basic helix-loop-helix 2, transcript variant X2
spermatogenesis and oogenesis specific basic helix-loop-helix 2, transcript variant X1
spermatogenesis and oogenesis specific basic helix-loop-helix 2, transcript variant X5
spermatogenesis- and oogenesis-specific basic helix-loop-helix-containing protein 2 isoform X3
spermatogenesis- and oogenesis-specific basic helix-loop-helix-containing protein 2 isoform X2
spermatogenesis- and oogenesis-specific basic helix-loop-helix-containing protein 2 isoform X1
spermatogenesis- and oogenesis-specific basic helix-loop-helix-containing protein 2 isoform X4
spermatogenesis- and oogenesis-specific basic helix-loop-helix-containing protein 2 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
serine rich and transmembrane domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
serine rich and transmembrane domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine rich and transmembrane domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
serine-rich and transmembrane domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 9
ALG5 dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X4
ALG5 dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ALG5 dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X3
ALG5 dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ALG5 dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X5
dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase isoform X2
dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase isoform X1
dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase isoform X3
dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase isoform X4
dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X3
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X10
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X6
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X4
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X7
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X5
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X8
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X1
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X14
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X12
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X4
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X11
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X10
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X2
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X5
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X3
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X9
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X1
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X8
SPT20 homolog, SAGA complex component, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X14
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X13
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X7
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X12
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 4
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: short transient receptor potential channel 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
FRAS1 related extracellular matrix 2, transcript variant X1
FRAS1 related extracellular matrix 2, transcript variant X2
FRAS1-related extracellular matrix protein 2 isoform X1
FRAS1-related extracellular matrix protein 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 Protein, and 14% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
proline and serine rich 1, transcript variant X5
proline and serine rich 1, transcript variant X3
proline and serine rich 1, transcript variant X2
proline and serine rich 1, transcript variant X6
proline and serine rich 1, transcript variant X4
proline and serine rich 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline and serine-rich protein 1 isoform X5
proline and serine-rich protein 1 isoform X3
proline and serine-rich protein 1 isoform X2
proline and serine-rich protein 1 isoform X6
proline and serine-rich protein 1 isoform X4
proline and serine-rich protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
LHFPL tetraspan subfamily member 6 protein
component of oligomeric golgi complex 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
component of oligomeric golgi complex 6, transcript variant X3
component of oligomeric golgi complex 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 6 isoform X1
conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 6 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118884280, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC118884280, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118884280, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC118884280, transcript variant X2
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00408
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S31, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S31, transcript variant X3
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S31, transcript variant X1
28S ribosomal protein S31, mitochondrial isoform X3
28S ribosomal protein S31, mitochondrial isoform X2
28S ribosomal protein S31, mitochondrial isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2-like, transcript variant X2
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2-like, transcript variant X3
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2-like, transcript variant X1
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2-like, transcript variant X5
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2-like isoform X2
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2-like isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2-like isoform X4
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2-like, transcript variant X4
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2-like isoform X3
thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X9
thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X8
thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 4 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein-sorting-associated protein 36
cytoskeleton associated protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoskeleton-associated protein 2 isoform X1
cytoskeleton associated protein 2, transcript variant X2
cytoskeleton-associated protein 2 isoform X2
NIMA related kinase 3, transcript variant X3
NIMA related kinase 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIMA related kinase 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIMA related kinase 3, transcript variant X5
NIMA related kinase 3, transcript variant X8
NIMA related kinase 3, transcript variant X1
NIMA related kinase 3, transcript variant X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek3 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek3 isoform X3
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek3 isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek3 isoform X4
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek3 isoform X6
NIMA related kinase 3, transcript variant X7
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek3 isoform X5
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek5
ALG11 alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ALG11 alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferase, transcript variant X3
ALG11 alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
GDP-Man:Man(3)GlcNAc(2)-PP-Dol alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferase isoform X2
GDP-Man:Man(3)GlcNAc(2)-PP-Dol alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferase isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 70
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: transmembrane protein 272
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X7
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X3
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X14
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X2
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X12
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X9
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X11
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X6
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X13
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X7
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X2
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X9
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X6
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X1
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X4
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X8
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrogenase/reductase 12, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X5
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X3
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X10
WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
WD repeat and FYVE domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
WD repeat and FYVE domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
integrator complex subunit 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 6, transcript variant X2
integrator complex subunit 6, transcript variant X3
integrator complex subunit 6, transcript variant X4
serpin family E member 3, transcript variant X2
serpin family E member 3, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118884263, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC118884263, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118884263, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118884263, transcript variant X4
family with sequence similarity 124 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 124 member A, transcript variant X2
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00012
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
40S ribosomal protein S4, X isoform-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 46 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein C13orf42 homolog
ribonuclease H2 subunit B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribonuclease H2 subunit B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribonuclease H2 subunit B, transcript variant X5
ribonuclease H2 subunit B, transcript variant X3
ribonuclease H2 subunit B, transcript variant X2
ribonuclease H2 subunit B, transcript variant X6
ribonuclease H2 subunit B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC118884273, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118884275, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118884275, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118884275, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC118884273, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC118884273, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118884273, transcript variant X3
transfer RNA glycine (anticodon CCC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 19% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant X3
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant X2
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant X9
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant X8
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: importin subunit alpha-4
transfer RNA glutamine (anticodon UUG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 1, transcript variant X1
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 1, transcript variant X4
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 1, transcript variant X9
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
PHD finger protein 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
PHD finger protein 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X4
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X2
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X3
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X7
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X1
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X8
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X6
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X6
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X5
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X4
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X2
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X5
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X3
calcium binding protein 39 like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium binding protein 39 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium binding protein 39 like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calcium binding protein 39 like, transcript variant X2
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 42% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
fibronectin type III domain containing 3A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
fibronectin type III domain containing 3A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
fibronectin type III domain containing 3A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibronectin type III domain containing 3A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibronectin type III domain containing 3A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibronectin type-III domain-containing protein 3A isoform X1
fibronectin type-III domain-containing protein 3A isoform X2
fibronectin type-III domain-containing protein 3A isoform X3
fibronectin type III domain containing 3A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 2, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118884122, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118884122, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118884122, transcript variant X3
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
RB transcriptional corepressor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoblastoma-associated protein isoform X1
RB transcriptional corepressor 1, transcript variant X2
retinoblastoma-associated protein isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator complex subunit 4, transcript variant X1
mediator complex subunit 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 4 isoform X1
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 4 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleotide triphosphate diphosphatase NUDT15
succinate-CoA ligase ADP-forming subunit beta
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
succinate--CoA ligase [ADP-forming] subunit beta, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
S-formylglutathione hydrolase isoform X1
S-formylglutathione hydrolase isoform X2
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X6
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X7
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 1, transcript variant X8
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X8
rubicon like autophagy enhancer, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein associated with UVRAG as autophagy enhancer isoform X4
rubicon like autophagy enhancer, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
rubicon like autophagy enhancer, transcript variant X2
protein associated with UVRAG as autophagy enhancer isoform X1
protein associated with UVRAG as autophagy enhancer isoform X2
rubicon like autophagy enhancer, transcript variant X3
protein associated with UVRAG as autophagy enhancer isoform X3
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 63
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon CUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1, transcript variant X3
lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1, transcript variant X1
lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X2
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X3
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13
siah E3 ubiquitin protein ligase family member 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chibby family member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 Proteins
chibby family member 2, transcript variant X2
chibby family member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 3
solute carrier family 25 member 30, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25 member 30, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25 member 30, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25 member 30, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25 member 30, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein, translationally-controlled 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 mRNAs, 4 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
translationally-controlled tumor protein
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00322
general transcription factor IIF subunit 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon UCU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
GPALPP motifs containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
GPALPP motifs containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear fragile X mental retardation-interacting protein 1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00561
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon UUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
TSC22 domain family member 1, transcript variant X1
TSC22 domain family member 1, transcript variant X2
TSC22 domain family protein 1 isoform X1
TSC22 domain family member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
TSC22 domain family protein 1 isoform X2
TSC22 domain family member 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
TSC22 domain family member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
TSC22 domain family protein 1 isoform X3
TSC22 domain family protein 1 isoform X4
stress associated endoplasmic reticulum protein family member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
stress associated endoplasmic reticulum protein family member 2, transcript variant X1
stress associated endoplasmic reticulum protein family member 2, transcript variant X2
stress-associated endoplasmic reticulum protein 2 isoform X2
stress-associated endoplasmic reticulum protein 2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 122, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 122, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 122, transcript variant X1
coiled-coil domain containing 122, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 122, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 122, transcript variant X6
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 122 isoform X1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 122 isoform X2
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X9
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X4
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X1
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X10
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X6
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X5
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X7
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1 isoform X1
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1 isoform X3
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X8
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1 isoform X2
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 55 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
epithelial stromal interaction 1, transcript variant X1
epithelial stromal interaction 1, transcript variant X3
epithelial stromal interaction 1, transcript variant X4
epithelial stromal interaction 1, transcript variant X2
epithelial-stromal interaction protein 1 isoform X1
epithelial-stromal interaction protein 1 isoform X3
epithelial-stromal interaction protein 1 isoform X4
epithelial-stromal interaction protein 1 isoform X2
epithelial stromal interaction 1, transcript variant X5
epithelial-stromal interaction protein 1 isoform X5
family with sequence similarity 216 member B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 5 Proteins
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 11
A-kinase anchoring protein 11, transcript variant X2
A-kinase anchoring protein 11, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
A-kinase anchoring protein 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
diacylglycerol kinase eta, transcript variant X1
diacylglycerol kinase eta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 8, transcript variant X1
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 8, transcript variant X2
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 8, transcript variant X3
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 8 isoform X1
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 8 isoform X2
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 8 isoform X3
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 8, transcript variant X4
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 8 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X5
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X2
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X6
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X4
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X3
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X7
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X5
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X4
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X2
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X1
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X3
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X6
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X8
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X9
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X10
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X7
mitochondrial translation release factor 1, transcript variant X2
mitochondrial translation release factor 1, transcript variant X5
mitochondrial translation release factor 1, transcript variant X1
mitochondrial translation release factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial translation release factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
peptide chain release factor 1, mitochondrial isoform X1
peptide chain release factor 1, mitochondrial isoform X2
peptide chain release factor 1, mitochondrial isoform X3
kelch repeat and BTB domain containing 7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
kelch repeat and BTB domain-containing protein 7
cell division control protein 42 homolog
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 8% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: cell division control protein 42 homolog
kelch repeat and BTB domain-containing protein 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
WW domain binding protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
WW domain binding protein 4, transcript variant X2
E74 like ETS transcription factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 1, transcript variant X8
transfer RNA lysine (anticodon CUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
E74 like ETS transcription factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 1, transcript variant X7
E74 like ETS transcription factor 1, transcript variant X5
E74 like ETS transcription factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 1, transcript variant X4
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-1 isoform X1
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-1 isoform X2
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-1 isoform X3
E74 like ETS transcription factor 1, transcript variant X9
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-1 isoform X4
SGT1 homolog, MIS12 kinetochore complex assembly cochaperone
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 1 isoform X2
leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3-like
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 28-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transformer-2 protein homolog beta-like, transcript variant X2
transformer-2 protein homolog beta-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 14% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00015
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
kinetochore-associated protein NSL1 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
diaphanous related formin 3, transcript variant X2
diaphanous related formin 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tudor domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
tudor domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
tudor domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
tudor domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 19 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 56 kDa regulatory subunit epsilon isoform-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 56 kDa regulatory subunit epsilon isoform-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 24% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 24% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
cytochrome c oxidase subunit 7C, mitochondrial-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
TSSK6-activating co-chaperone protein-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 36% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 4% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 8% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
kelch like family member 1, transcript variant X2
kelch like family member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein aurora borealis
DIS3 homolog, exosome endoribonuclease and 3'-5' exoribonuclease
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: exosome complex exonuclease RRP44
progesterone immunomodulatory binding factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
progesterone immunomodulatory binding factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
progesterone immunomodulatory binding factor 1, transcript variant X3
progesterone-induced-blocking factor 1 isoform X1
progesterone-induced-blocking factor 1 isoform X2
transfer RNA alanine (anticodon CGC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
rab GDP dissociation inhibitor beta-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: rab GDP dissociation inhibitor beta-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Kruppel like factor 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Kruppel like factor 5, transcript variant X2
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase A-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 47 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: Krueppel-like factor 12
TBC1 domain family member 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 4, transcript variant X1
TBC1 domain family member 4, transcript variant X4
TBC1 domain family member 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COMM domain containing 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
COMM domain containing 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
COMM domain containing 6, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
COMM domain containing 6, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
COMM domain containing 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
COMM domain-containing protein 6 isoform X1
COMM domain-containing protein 6 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC118884079, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC118884079, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118884079, transcript variant X1
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 12
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 19% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ceroid-lipofuscinosis neuronal protein 5
F-box and leucine rich repeat protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
F-box and leucine rich repeat protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2
transfer RNA glycine (anticodon GCC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: SLAIN motif-containing protein 1
endothelin receptor type B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
endothelin receptor type B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 15% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
POU domain, class 4, transcription factor 1
ORC ubiquitin ligase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ORC ubiquitin ligase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ORC ubiquitin ligase 1, transcript variant X2
ORC ubiquitin ligase 1, transcript variant X4
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X6
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X5
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X2
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X9
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X10
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X3
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X7
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
histidine triad nucleotide-binding protein 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 26 Proteins, and 54% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 40% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT and NTRK like family member 5, transcript variant X1
SLIT and NTRK like family member 5, transcript variant X2
SLIT and NTRK like family member 5, transcript variant X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: pantothenate kinase 3-like
uncharacterized LOC118884253, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118884253, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118883955, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118883955, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC118883955, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118883955, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transfer RNA phenylalanine (anticodon GAA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
TDP-glucose 4,6-dehydratase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
TDP-glucose 4,6-dehydratase, transcript variant X2
dTDP-D-glucose 4,6-dehydratase isoform X2
dTDP-D-glucose 4,6-dehydratase isoform X1
G protein-coupled receptor 180, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 180, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 180, transcript variant X3
G protein-coupled receptor 180, transcript variant X4
integral membrane protein GPR180 isoform X1
integral membrane protein GPR180 isoform X2
integral membrane protein GPR180 isoform X3
SRY-box transcription factor 21, transcript variant X1
SRY-box transcription factor 21, transcript variant X3
SRY-box transcription factor 21, transcript variant X2
ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X7
ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X8
ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X6
ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X5
ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X4
ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 isoform X6
multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 isoform X7
multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 isoform X1
multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 isoform X3
multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 isoform X4
multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 isoform X2
multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00003
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
multidrug resistance-associated protein 4-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00619
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X5
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X6
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X7
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X4
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X3
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X2
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X1
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 8 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucose glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 2, transcript variant X1
UDP-glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 2 isoform X1
UDP-glucose glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 2, transcript variant X2
UDP-glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 Proteins, and 27% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(O) subunit gamma-5-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X6
muscleblind like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 7 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
FERM, ARH/RhoGEF and pleckstrin domain protein 1, transcript variant X5
FERM, ARH/RhoGEF and pleckstrin domain protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
FERM, ARH/RhoGEF and pleckstrin domain protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
FERM, ARH/RhoGEF and pleckstrin domain protein 1, transcript variant X3
FERM, ARH/RhoGEF and pleckstrin domain protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
FERM, ARHGEF and pleckstrin domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
FERM, ARHGEF and pleckstrin domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
FERM, ARHGEF and pleckstrin domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 15 member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 12 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 15 member 1, transcript variant X4
solute carrier family 15 member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 15 member 1, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 15 member 1 isoform X4
solute carrier family 15 member 1 isoform X1
solute carrier family 15 member 1 isoform X2
solute carrier family 15 member 1 isoform X3
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9-like, transcript variant X4
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9-like, transcript variant X3
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9-like isoform X4
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9-like isoform X3
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9-like, transcript variant X2
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9-like isoform X2
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9-like, transcript variant X1
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9-like isoform X1
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9-like, transcript variant X5
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9-like isoform X5
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X1
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X3
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X2
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X1
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X4
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X5
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein enabled homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin-associated domain-containing protein 2
tRNA-splicing endonuclease subunit Sen15-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
citramalyl-CoA lyase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
citramalyl-CoA lyase, transcript variant X2
citramalyl-CoA lyase, transcript variant X3
citramalyl-CoA lyase, mitochondrial isoform X1
citramalyl-CoA lyase, mitochondrial isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: CUE domain-containing protein 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins
propionyl-CoA carboxylase subunit alpha, transcript variant X1
propionyl-CoA carboxylase subunit alpha, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
propionyl-CoA carboxylase alpha chain, mitochondrial isoform X1
propionyl-CoA carboxylase alpha chain, mitochondrial isoform X2
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X12
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X6
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X4
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X10
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X9
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X3
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X1
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X8
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X2
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X5
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X7
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X11
gamma-glutamylaminecyclotransferase isoform X2
gamma-glutamylaminecyclotransferase isoform X3
gamma-glutamylaminecyclotransferase isoform X1
gamma-glutamylaminecyclotransferase isoform X4
transmembrane O-mannosyltransferase targeting cadherins 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 5 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane O-mannosyltransferase targeting cadherins 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane O-mannosyltransferase targeting cadherins 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane O-mannosyltransferase targeting cadherins 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane O-mannosyltransferase targeting cadherins 4, transcript variant X4
protein O-mannosyl-transferase TMTC4 isoform X1
protein O-mannosyl-transferase TMTC4 isoform X2
protein O-mannosyl-transferase TMTC4 isoform X3
protein O-mannosyl-transferase TMTC4 isoform X4
sodium leak channel, non-selective, transcript variant X3
sodium leak channel, non-selective, transcript variant X5
sodium leak channel, non-selective, transcript variant X4
sodium leak channel, non-selective, transcript variant X2
sodium leak channel, non-selective, transcript variant X7
sodium leak channel, non-selective, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sodium leak channel non-selective protein isoform X2
sodium leak channel non-selective protein isoform X4
sodium leak channel non-selective protein isoform X3
sodium leak channel non-selective protein isoform X1
sodium leak channel non-selective protein isoform X5
sodium leak channel, non-selective, transcript variant X6
integrin subunit beta like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
integrin subunit beta like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor 14, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor 14, transcript variant X3
fibroblast growth factor 14, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00045
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tripeptidyl peptidase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripeptidyl peptidase 2, transcript variant X4
tripeptidyl peptidase 2, transcript variant X3
tripeptidyl peptidase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21C
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00614
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 31% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: coiled-coil domain-containing protein 168
testis expressed 30, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
testis expressed 30, transcript variant X4
testis expressed 30, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
testis expressed 30, transcript variant X3
protein O-glucosyltransferase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein O-glucosyltransferase 2, transcript variant X2
basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing, transcript variant X6
basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing, transcript variant X2
basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing, transcript variant X3
basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
basic immunoglobulin-like variable motif-containing protein isoform X1
basic immunoglobulin-like variable motif-containing protein isoform X2
ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease, transcript variant X3
ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease, transcript variant X1
DNA repair protein complementing XP-G cells isoform X1
DNA repair protein complementing XP-G cells isoform X3
ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease, transcript variant X2
DNA repair protein complementing XP-G cells isoform X2
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21E, transcript variant X2
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21E, transcript variant X3
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21E, transcript variant X6
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21E, transcript variant X7
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21E, transcript variant X1
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21E, transcript variant X4
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21E isoform X4
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21E isoform X5
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21E isoform X2
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21E isoform X1
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21E, transcript variant X5
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21E isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine and glutamate rich 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine and glutamate rich 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine and glutamate rich 1, transcript variant X2
family with sequence similarity 155 member A, transcript variant X1
transmembrane protein FAM155A isoform X1
family with sequence similarity 155 member A, transcript variant X2
transmembrane protein FAM155A isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
abhydrolase domain containing 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
abhydrolase domain containing 13, transcript variant X3
abhydrolase domain containing 13, transcript variant X2
abhydrolase domain containing 13, transcript variant X5
abhydrolase domain containing 13, transcript variant X7
abhydrolase domain containing 13, transcript variant X4
abhydrolase domain containing 13, transcript variant X8
abhydrolase domain containing 13, transcript variant X9
abhydrolase domain containing 13, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00001
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: collagen alpha-1(IV) chain
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC118883979, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118883979, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118883979, transcript variant X3
NAD(P)HX dehydratase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
NAD(P)HX dehydratase, transcript variant X1
ATP-dependent (S)-NAD(P)H-hydrate dehydratase isoform X1
ATP-dependent (S)-NAD(P)H-hydrate dehydratase isoform X3
NAD(P)HX dehydratase, transcript variant X2
ATP-dependent (S)-NAD(P)H-hydrate dehydratase isoform X2
NAD(P)HX dehydratase, transcript variant X4
ATP-dependent (S)-NAD(P)H-hydrate dehydratase isoform X4
cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X1
cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X2
cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X3
probable cysteine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial isoform X1
probable cysteine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial isoform X2
probable cysteine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial isoform X3
cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable cysteine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial isoform X4
inhibitor of growth family member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of growth protein 1 isoform X1
inhibitor of growth family member 1, transcript variant X2
inhibitor of growth protein 1 isoform X2
ankyrin repeat domain 10, transcript variant X2
ankyrin repeat domain 10, transcript variant X1
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 10 isoform X2
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 10 isoform X1
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7, transcript variant X1
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7, transcript variant X5
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X1
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X5
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X3
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X4
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X6
tigger transposable element-derived protein 1-like
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7, transcript variant X9
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7, transcript variant X7
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X7
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7, transcript variant X2
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X2
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 54% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tubulin gamma complex associated protein 3, transcript variant X2
tubulin gamma complex associated protein 3, transcript variant X1
gamma-tubulin complex component 3 isoform X2
gamma-tubulin complex component 3 isoform X1
ATPase phospholipid transporting 11A, transcript variant X2
ATPase phospholipid transporting 11A, transcript variant X6
ATPase phospholipid transporting 11A, transcript variant X1
ATPase phospholipid transporting 11A, transcript variant X3
ATPase phospholipid transporting 11A, transcript variant X4
ATPase phospholipid transporting 11A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform X2
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform X1
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform X3
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform X5
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform X4
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 8 bases in 7 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 8 bases in 7 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein Z, vitamin K dependent plasma glycoprotein
PCI domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
PCI domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
PCI domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
PCI domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
PCI domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
PCI domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
PCI domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
PCI domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysosomal associated membrane protein 1, transcript variant X3
lysosomal associated membrane protein 1, transcript variant X4
lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 1 isoform X3
lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 1 isoform X4
lysosomal associated membrane protein 1, transcript variant X1
lysosomal associated membrane protein 1, transcript variant X2
lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 1 isoform X1
lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 1 isoform X2
growth hormone regulated TBC protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
growth hormone regulated TBC protein 1, transcript variant X2
growth hormone-regulated TBC protein 1 isoform X1
growth hormone-regulated TBC protein 1 isoform X2
growth hormone regulated TBC protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
growth hormone-regulated TBC protein 1 isoform X3
ADP-ribosylhydrolase like 1, transcript variant X1
ADP-ribosylhydrolase like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase-like protein 1 isoform X1
protein ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase-like protein 1 isoform X2
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X7
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X11
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X8
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X10
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X6
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X9
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X15
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X14
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X12
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 2, transcript variant X13
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X6
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X4
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X3
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X1
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X2
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X7
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X1
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X5
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X10
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X11
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X9
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X8
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: potassium-transporting ATPase subunit beta
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 4 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 4 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: rhodopsin kinase GRK1
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X4
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X2
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X6
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X3
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X1
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein C13orf46 homolog
RAS p21 protein activator 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
RAS p21 protein activator 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras GTPase-activating protein 3 isoform X2
ras GTPase-activating protein 3 isoform X1
cell division cycle 16, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell division cycle 16, transcript variant X1
cell division cycle protein 16 homolog isoform X1
cell division cycle protein 16 homolog isoform X2
cell division cycle 16, transcript variant X3
cell division cycle protein 16 homolog isoform X3
UPF3A regulator of nonsense mediated mRNA decay, transcript variant X1
UPF3A regulator of nonsense mediated mRNA decay, transcript variant X2
UPF3A regulator of nonsense mediated mRNA decay, transcript variant X4
UPF3A regulator of nonsense mediated mRNA decay, transcript variant X7
UPF3A regulator of nonsense mediated mRNA decay, transcript variant X6
UPF3A regulator of nonsense mediated mRNA decay, transcript variant X8
UPF3A regulator of nonsense mediated mRNA decay, transcript variant X9
UPF3A regulator of nonsense mediated mRNA decay, transcript variant X5
UPF3A regulator of nonsense mediated mRNA decay, transcript variant X3
regulator of nonsense transcripts 3A isoform X2
regulator of nonsense transcripts 3A isoform X1
regulator of nonsense transcripts 3A isoform X3
regulator of nonsense transcripts 3A isoform X4
regulator of nonsense transcripts 3A isoform X5
regulator of nonsense transcripts 3A isoform X6
chromosome alignment maintaining phosphoprotein 1, transcript variant X2
chromosome alignment maintaining phosphoprotein 1, transcript variant X4
chromosome alignment maintaining phosphoprotein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome alignment maintaining phosphoprotein 1, transcript variant X3
chromosome alignment-maintaining phosphoprotein 1