Panthera leo isolate Ple1 chromosome Y, P.leo_Ple1_pat1.1, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Laurasiatheria; Carnivora; Feliformia; Felidae; Pantherinae; Panthera.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM031449.1.\nAssembly name: P.leo_Ple1_pat1.1\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Texas A&M University on\n2021/05/13. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession JAEQMX000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Texas A&M University\nAssembly Date :: 2020\nAssembly Method :: NextDenovo v. 2.2-beta.0\nAssembly Name :: P.leo_Ple1_pat1.0\nDiploid :: Alternate pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 76.0x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel 2\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Panthera leo Annotation Release 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 9.0\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
phosphatidylinositol specific phospholipase C X domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: polyA evidence [ECO:0006239]
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 2 regulatory subunit B''beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 2 regulatory subunit B''beta, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 2 regulatory subunit B''beta, transcript variant X3
protein phosphatase 2 regulatory subunit B''beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit B'' subunit beta isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit B'' subunit beta isoform X4
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit B'' subunit beta isoform X3
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit B'' subunit beta isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 49% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 2 receptor subunit alpha
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor subunit alpha
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor subunit alpha-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor subunit alpha-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor subunit alpha-like isoform X1
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor subunit alpha-like isoform X2
interleukin 3 receptor subunit alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 3 receptor subunit alpha, transcript variant X2
interleukin-3 receptor subunit alpha isoform X1
interleukin-3 receptor subunit alpha isoform X2
acetylserotonin O-methyltransferase like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
acetylserotonin O-methyltransferase like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
acetylserotonin O-methyltransferase like, transcript variant X1
acetylserotonin O-methyltransferase like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable bifunctional dTTP/UTP pyrophosphatase/methyltransferase protein isoform X2
probable bifunctional dTTP/UTP pyrophosphatase/methyltransferase protein isoform X1
probable bifunctional dTTP/UTP pyrophosphatase/methyltransferase protein isoform X4
probable bifunctional dTTP/UTP pyrophosphatase/methyltransferase protein isoform X5
acetylserotonin O-methyltransferase like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable bifunctional dTTP/UTP pyrophosphatase/methyltransferase protein isoform X3
P2Y receptor family member 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
P2Y receptor family member 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
P2Y receptor family member 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 49% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member on chromosome X
zinc finger BED-type containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger BED-type containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Xg glycoprotein (Xg blood group), transcript variant X3
Xg glycoprotein (Xg blood group), transcript variant X1
Xg glycoprotein (Xg blood group), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 27% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: matrix-remodeling-associated protein 5
protein kinase X-linked, transcript variant X1
protein kinase X-linked, transcript variant X2
cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit PRKX
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon GCG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00004
neuroligin 4 X-linked, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
neuroligin 4 X-linked, transcript variant X2
neuroligin 4 X-linked, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
pseudouridine 5'-phosphatase, transcript variant X2
pseudouridine 5'-phosphatase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon UCG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
patatin like phospholipase domain containing 4, transcript variant X2
patatin like phospholipase domain containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
patatin like phospholipase domain containing 4, transcript variant X3
patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC122212625, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC122212625, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC122212625, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC122212632, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC122212632, transcript variant X2
transducin beta like 1 X-linked, transcript variant X3
transducin beta like 1 X-linked, transcript variant X5
transducin beta like 1 X-linked, transcript variant X1
transducin beta like 1 X-linked, transcript variant X4
transducin beta like 1 X-linked, transcript variant X2
F-box-like/WD repeat-containing protein TBL1X
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
shroom family member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA glutamine (anticodon UUG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
shroom family member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
shroom family member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA tyrosine (anticodon GUA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X4
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X5
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X9
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X3
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X2
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X7
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X8
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X13
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X1
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X10
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X16
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X6
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X12
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X15
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X19
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X17
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X18
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X3
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X9
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X1
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X5
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X8
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X11
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X10
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X12
histone demethylase UTY-like isoform X13
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X4
lysine-specific demethylase 6A-like isoform X2
ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX3X, transcript variant X1
ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX3X, transcript variant X2
ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX3X isoform X1
ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX3X isoform X2
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X4
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X1
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X3
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X, transcript variant X2
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X3
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X2
probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 47% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ras-related protein Rab-9A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
OFD1 centriole and centriolar satellite protein
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: oral-facial-digital syndrome 1 protein
gamma-taxilin-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-taxilin-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 26% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 3
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 188 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 188 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein, transcript variant X7
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 188 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 189 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein, transcript variant X3
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 188 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein, transcript variant X8
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein, transcript variant X10
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein, transcript variant X6
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 162 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein isoform X1
zinc finger X-chromosomal protein isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X11
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X5
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X4
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X3
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X6
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X9
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X7
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X8
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X12
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X13
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X14
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X15
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X16
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X18
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal, transcript variant X17
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal isoform X4
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal isoform X5
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal isoform X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal isoform X3
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal isoform X6
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal isoform X7
heat shock transcription factor, Y-linked-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns