Ailuropoda melanoleuca isolate Jingjing chromosome 18, ASM200744v2, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Laurasiatheria; Carnivora; Caniformia; Ursidae; Ailuropoda.
Chromosome-level genome assembly for giant panda provides novel insights into Carnivora chromosome evolution
Comparative genomics reveals convergent evolution between the bamboo-eating giant and red pandas
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM022836.1.\nAssembly name: ASM200744v2\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Institute of Zoology, Chinese\nAcademy of Sciences on 2020/04/20. The original whole-genome\nshotgun project has the accession LNAT00000000.2.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of\n Sciences\nAssembly Method :: Scaff10X v. Sep-2017\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 93.0x\nSequencing Technology :: Illumina; 10X Genomics; Flow-sorted\n chromosome sequencing\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Ailuropoda melanoleuca Annotation\n Release 103\nAnnotation Version :: 103\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.4\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CUB and sushi domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase epsilon
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: XK-related protein 5
uncharacterized LOC117797077, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC117797077, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 17-like protein 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC117797115, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC117797115, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC117797115, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC117797115, transcript variant X4
zinc finger protein 596-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105242154, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC105242154, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC105242154, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105242154, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105242154, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105242154, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC105242154, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC105242154, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC105242154, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X2
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: olfactory receptor 12D2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins
zinc finger protein 705A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 705A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X1
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X2
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X3
spermatogenesis associated 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis-associated protein 4 isoform X1
spermatogenesis associated 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis-associated protein 4 isoform X2
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 5, transcript variant X1
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 5 isoform X1
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 5 isoform X4
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 5 isoform X2
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 5 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC117797091, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC117797091, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
nei like DNA glycosylase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
nei like DNA glycosylase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
aspartylglucosaminidase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
aspartylglucosaminidase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
aspartylglucosaminidase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
N(4)-(beta-N-acetylglucosaminyl)-L-asparaginase isoform X3
N(4)-(beta-N-acetylglucosaminyl)-L-asparaginase isoform X2
N(4)-(beta-N-acetylglucosaminyl)-L-asparaginase isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 12% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00099
teneurin transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
teneurin transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
teneurin transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
teneurin transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X3
teneurin transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
teneurin transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5B, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 46% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
WW and C2 domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
WW and C2 domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
WW and C2 domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 35% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 49% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 10-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CDKN2A interacting protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDKN2A interacting protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 8% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 9% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transcription elongation factor A protein-like 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 44% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC117797085, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC117797085, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC117797085, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
RWD domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
trafficking protein particle complex 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerophosphocholine cholinephosphodiesterase ENPP6
uncharacterized LOC117797088, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC117797088, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC117797088, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC117797088, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC117797088, transcript variant X1
interferon regulatory factor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon regulatory factor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon regulatory factor 2 isoform X2
interferon regulatory factor 2 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC105242160, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105242160, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105242160, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC105242160, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC105242160, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105242160, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC105242160, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X1
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X2
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC117797104, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC117797104, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein U, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein U, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC117797105, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC117797105, transcript variant X1
acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 1, transcript variant X5
acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase 1 isoform X2
long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 103 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
helt bHLH transcription factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
helt bHLH transcription factor, transcript variant X2
hairy and enhancer of split-related protein HELT isoform X1
hairy and enhancer of split-related protein HELT isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC109488400, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC109488400, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC109488400, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 97, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 97, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 97 isoform X1
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 97 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ankyrin repeat domain 37, transcript variant X2
ankyrin repeat domain 37, transcript variant X1
ankyrin repeat domain 37, transcript variant X4
ankyrin repeat domain 37, transcript variant X3
ankyrin repeat domain 37, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 37 isoform X2
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 37 isoform X1
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 37 isoform X4
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 37 isoform X3
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 37 isoform X5
UFM1 specific peptidase 2, transcript variant X2
UFM1 specific peptidase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 18 C4orf47 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 18 C4orf47 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 110
PDZ and LIM domain 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
PDZ and LIM domain 3, transcript variant X3
PDZ and LIM domain 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X13
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X16
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X15
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X20
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X19
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X16
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X12
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X15
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X11
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X14
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X13
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X10
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X9
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X17
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X12
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X11
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X9
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X8
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X7
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X6
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X10
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X6
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X5
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X8
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X7
toll like receptor 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
toll like receptor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
toll like receptor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 149 member A, transcript variant X3
family with sequence similarity 149 member A, transcript variant X2
family with sequence similarity 149 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytochrome P450 4V2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytochrome P450 4V2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
coagulation factor XI, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
coagulation factor XI, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X4
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X3
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X2
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X6
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X5
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X7
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00004
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tripartite motif family like 2, transcript variant X2
tripartite motif family like 2, transcript variant X1
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIML2 isoform X2
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIML2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIML1
uncharacterized LOC117797071, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC117797071, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 11% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
FSHD region gene 1, transcript variant X1
FSHD region gene 1, transcript variant X2
FSHD region gene 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X5
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X14
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X10
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X1
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X3
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X4
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X7
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X16
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X17
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X10
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X9
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X8
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X7
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X5
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X3
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X6
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X2
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X1
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X12
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X15
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X13
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X14
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X12
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X4
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X19
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X11
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X18
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X17
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X1
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X3
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 isoform X1
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 isoform X2
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 isoform X3
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X5
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 isoform X4
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 isoform X5
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 isoform X6
platelet derived growth factor receptor like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
platelet-derived growth factor receptor-like protein
solute carrier family 7 member 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 7 member 2, transcript variant X1
solute carrier family 7 member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 7 member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
cationic amino acid transporter 2 isoform X2
cationic amino acid transporter 2 isoform X1
myotubularin related protein 7, transcript variant X2
myotubularin related protein 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
VPS37A subunit of ESCRT-I, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
VPS37A subunit of ESCRT-I, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 37A
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial calcium uptake family member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial calcium uptake family member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial calcium uptake family member 3, transcript variant X2
calcium uptake protein 3, mitochondrial isoform X3
calcium uptake protein 3, mitochondrial isoform X2
calcium uptake protein 3, mitochondrial isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 subunit 5-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 33% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X3
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X3
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X7
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X6
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X8
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X2
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X1
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X6
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X5
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X7
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC105241731, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105241731, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC105241731, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC105241731, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC105241731, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC105241731, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105241731, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC105241731, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC105241731, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC105241731, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC105241731, transcript variant X1
tumor suppressor candidate 3, transcript variant X1
tumor suppressor candidate 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 9% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
rho GTPase-activating protein 7-like, transcript variant X2
rho GTPase-activating protein 7-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X3
rho GTPase-activating protein 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X1
rho GTPase-activating protein 7, transcript variant X4
rho GTPase-activating protein 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X2
rho GTPase-activating protein 7, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 7 isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC117797098, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC117797098, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC117797098, transcript variant X2
tRNA methyltransferase 9B (putative), transcript variant X3
tRNA methyltransferase 9B (putative), transcript variant X1
tRNA methyltransferase 9B (putative), transcript variant X2
tRNA methyltransferase 9B (putative), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC109489687, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC109489687, transcript variant X1
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and RING finger protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
PEAK1 related, kinase-activating pseudokinase 1, transcript variant X1
PEAK1 related, kinase-activating pseudokinase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
inactive tyrosine-protein kinase PRAG1 isoform X1
inactive tyrosine-protein kinase PRAG1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA methionine (anticodon CAU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 8-like, transcript variant X3
low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 8-like, transcript variant X2
low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 8-like, transcript variant X1
low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 2-like isoform X1
low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 8-like, transcript variant X4
low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 8-like isoform X2
low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4-like isoform X3
very low-density lipoprotein receptor-like isoform X2
low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 8-like isoform X1
malignant fibrous histiocytoma amplified sequence 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
malignant fibrous histiocytoma amplified sequence 1, transcript variant X2
malignant fibrous histiocytoma amplified sequence 1, transcript variant X4
malignant fibrous histiocytoma amplified sequence 1, transcript variant X3
malignant fibrous histiocytoma-amplified sequence 1
malignant fibrous histiocytoma amplified sequence 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
exoribonuclease 1, transcript variant X2
exoribonuclease 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC117797069, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC117797069, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC117797069, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC117797069, transcript variant X4
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B, transcript variant X1
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B isoform X1
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC105242000, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105242000, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105242000, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase tankyrase-1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
store-operated calcium entry associated regulatory factor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
store-operated calcium entry-associated regulatory factor
leptin receptor overlapping transcript like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
leptin receptor overlapping transcript-like 1
membrane bound O-acyltransferase domain containing 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
dynactin subunit 6, transcript variant X2
dynactin subunit 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X6
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X8
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X2
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X1
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X7
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X1
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X6
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X5
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X4
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X2
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X4
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X3
general transcription factor IIE subunit 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription initiation factor IIE subunit beta
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
small integral membrane protein 18, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
small integral membrane protein 18, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glutathione-disulfide reductase, transcript variant X2
glutathione-disulfide reductase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione reductase, mitochondrial isoform X1
glutathione reductase, mitochondrial isoform X2
UBX domain protein 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain protein 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain-containing protein 8 isoform X1
UBX domain-containing protein 8 isoform X2
protein phosphatase 2 catalytic subunit beta
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit beta isoform
testis expressed 15, meiosis and synapsis associated, transcript variant X1
testis expressed 15, meiosis and synapsis associated, transcript variant X2
testis expressed 15, meiosis and synapsis associated, transcript variant X3
testis expressed 15, meiosis and synapsis associated, transcript variant X4
testis expressed 15, meiosis and synapsis associated, transcript variant X5
purine rich element binding protein G, transcript variant X1
purine rich element binding protein G, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
purine-rich element-binding protein gamma isoform X2
purine-rich element-binding protein gamma isoform X1
WRN RecQ like helicase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
WRN RecQ like helicase, transcript variant X2
WRN RecQ like helicase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
WRN RecQ like helicase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
WRN RecQ like helicase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
WRN RecQ like helicase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Werner syndrome ATP-dependent helicase isoform X1
Werner syndrome ATP-dependent helicase isoform X2
Werner syndrome ATP-dependent helicase isoform X3
WRN RecQ like helicase, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Werner syndrome ATP-dependent helicase isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pro-neuregulin-2, membrane-bound isoform-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 4% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X5
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X4
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X6
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X9
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X2
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X1
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X3
pro-neuregulin-3, membrane-bound isoform isoform X8
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X7
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X11
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X12
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X13
fucosyltransferase 10, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
fucosyltransferase 10, transcript variant X2
fucosyltransferase 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
TELO2 interacting protein 2, transcript variant X2
TELO2 interacting protein 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
TELO2 interacting protein 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
TELO2 interacting protein 2, transcript variant X3
TELO2 interacting protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X5
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X6
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X9
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X10
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X8
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X5
PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X4
PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X8
PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X7
PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X6
SH2 domain containing 4A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain containing 4A, transcript variant X4
SH2 domain containing 4A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain containing 4A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SH2 domain-containing protein 4A isoform X1
SH2 domain-containing protein 4A isoform X2
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC117797084, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC117797084, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC117797084, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC117797084, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC117797070, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC117797070, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X4
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X5
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X3
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X2
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X1
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X2
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X3
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X4
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X5
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X2
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X6
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X4
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase isoform X5
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase isoform X2
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase isoform X1
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase isoform X4
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X1
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein farnesyltransferase/geranylgeranyltransferase type-1 subunit alpha
hook microtubule tethering protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
hook microtubule tethering protein 3, transcript variant X2
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X4
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF170 isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF170 isoform X1
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X6
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X5
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF170 isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF170 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 71 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 6 subunit, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-6 isoform X3
cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 6 subunit, transcript variant X2
cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 6 subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 6 subunit, transcript variant X3
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-6 isoform X1
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-6 isoform X2
cholinergic receptor nicotinic beta 3 subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit beta-3
small integral membrane protein 19, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
small integral membrane protein 19, transcript variant X1
small integral membrane protein 19 isoform X1
small integral membrane protein 19 isoform X2
sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 2
voltage dependent anion channel 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage dependent anion channel 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage dependent anion channel 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3 isoform X2
voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3 isoform X1
dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X5
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X1
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: histone acetyltransferase KAT6A
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00015
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 37% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
GINS complex subunit 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
GINS complex subunit 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA replication complex GINS protein SLD5 isoform X2
DNA replication complex GINS protein SLD5 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC117797099, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC117797099, transcript variant X2
zinc finger matrin-type 4, transcript variant X1
zinc finger matrin-type 4, transcript variant X3
zinc finger matrin-type 4, transcript variant X2
zinc finger matrin-type protein 4 isoform X1
zinc finger matrin-type protein 4 isoform X3
zinc finger matrin-type protein 4 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins
transcriptional and immune response regulator
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X5
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X1
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X2
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X3
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X4
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X3
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X1
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X2
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1, transcript variant X2
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1, transcript variant X1
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 isoform X2
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 isoform X1
A disintegrin and metallopeptidase domain 3
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 18-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32, transcript variant X2
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32, transcript variant X4
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32, transcript variant X1
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32, transcript variant X6
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32, transcript variant X7
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32 isoform X2
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32 isoform X4
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32 isoform X7
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32 isoform X1
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32 isoform X6
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32, transcript variant X5
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32, transcript variant X3
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32 isoform X5
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32 isoform X3
ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9, transcript variant X2
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 9 isoform X1
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 9 isoform X2
ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9, transcript variant X3
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 9 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X2
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X3
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 2
uncharacterized LOC109490562, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC109490562, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC109490562, transcript variant X2
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X9
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X5
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X11
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X8
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X8
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X5
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X3
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X7
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X6
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X4
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X1
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X1
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X5
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, transcript variant X6
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X1
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X3
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X2
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X4
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X5
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X6
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 isoform X7
leucine zipper and EF-hand containing transmembrane protein 2, transcript variant X3
leucine zipper and EF-hand containing transmembrane protein 2, transcript variant X2
leucine zipper and EF-hand containing transmembrane protein 2, transcript variant X5
leucine zipper and EF-hand containing transmembrane protein 2, transcript variant X1
leucine zipper and EF-hand containing transmembrane protein 2, transcript variant X6
leucine zipper and EF-hand containing transmembrane protein 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
LETM1 domain-containing protein LETM2, mitochondrial isoform X4
LETM1 domain-containing protein LETM2, mitochondrial isoform X3
LETM1 domain-containing protein LETM2, mitochondrial isoform X2
LETM1 domain-containing protein LETM2, mitochondrial isoform X1
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X1
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X4
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X3
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X5
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X2
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X4
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X1
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X5
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X3
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X6
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X10
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X9
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X12
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
BAG cochaperone 4, transcript variant X2
BAG cochaperone 4, transcript variant X1
BAG family molecular chaperone regulator 4 isoform X2
BAG family molecular chaperone regulator 4 isoform X1
LSM1 homolog, mRNA degradation associated
U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, mitochondrial
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X5
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X4
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X6
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X3
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X2
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X1
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X4
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1
adrenoceptor beta 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
adrenoceptor beta 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1 like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
putative aspartate aminotransferase, cytoplasmic 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
BRF2 RNA polymerase III transcription initiation factor subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor IIIB 50 kDa subunit
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: adhesion G protein-coupled receptor A2
pyridoxal phosphate binding protein, transcript variant X1
pyridoxal phosphate binding protein, transcript variant X2
pyridoxal phosphate homeostasis protein isoform X1
pyridoxal phosphate homeostasis protein isoform X2
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon CUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
ER lipid raft associated 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
ER lipid raft associated 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
ER lipid raft associated 2, transcript variant X3
ER lipid raft associated 2, transcript variant X4
ER lipid raft associated 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ER lipid raft associated 2, transcript variant X6
potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily U member 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: potassium channel subfamily U member 1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 22
unc-5 netrin receptor D, transcript variant X11
unc-5 netrin receptor D, transcript variant X12
unc-5 netrin receptor D, transcript variant X10
unc-5 netrin receptor D, transcript variant X9
unc-5 netrin receptor D, transcript variant X4
unc-5 netrin receptor D, transcript variant X3
unc-5 netrin receptor D, transcript variant X8
unc-5 netrin receptor D, transcript variant X6
unc-5 netrin receptor D, transcript variant X2
unc-5 netrin receptor D, transcript variant X7
unc-5 netrin receptor D, transcript variant X5
unc-5 netrin receptor D, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 107 Proteins, and 19% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 122, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 122, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01210