Canis lupus familiaris isolate Mischka breed German Shepherd chromosome 38, alternate assembly UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Laurasiatheria; Carnivora; Caniformia; Canidae; Canis.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM021999.1.\nAssembly name: UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Uppsala University on\n2020/03/10. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession JAAHUQ000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Uppsala University\nAssembly Date :: JUN-2019\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 0.5.0\nAssembly Name :: UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 100.0x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel; Hi-C\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Canis lupus familiaris Annotation\n Release 106\nAnnotation Version :: 106\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.5\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094587, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094587, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094576, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline and arginine rich end leucine rich repeat protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline and arginine rich end leucine rich repeat protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 93 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
opticin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001003056.1
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 1 frameshift compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001003056.1
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution, 1 frameshift compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
COORDINATES: ab initio prediction:SignalP:4.0
Cleavage, by MMP7. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q9UBM4; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P83286.1); cleavage site
Sulfotyrosine. /evidence=ECO:0000255; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P83286.1); sulfatation site
Cleavage, by MMP13. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P58874; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P83286.1); cleavage site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P83286.1); Region: LRR 1
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P83286.1); Region: LRR 2
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P83286.1); Region: LRR 3
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P83286.1); Region: LRR 4
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P83286.1); Region: LRR 5
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P83286.1); Region: LRR 6
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P83286.1); Region: LRR 7
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X5
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X1
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X2
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X3
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X8
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X4
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger BED domain-containing protein 6
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 11A isoform X1
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 11A isoform X2
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein E isoform X2
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein E isoform X1
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein E isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethanolamine kinase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethanolamine kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethanolamine kinase 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethanolamine kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethanolamine kinase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102154487, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102154487, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102154487, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102154487, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102154487, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
renin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001003194.2
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
N-linked (GlcNAc...) asparagine. /evidence=ECO:0000255; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6DYE7.1); glycosylation site
KiSS-1 metastasis suppressor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
golgi transport 1A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
golgi transport 1A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
vesicle transport protein GOT1A isoform X1
vesicle transport protein GOT1A isoform X2
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X20
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X11
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 15B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 beta, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 beta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 3-kinase C2 domain-containing subunit beta isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 beta, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 beta, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 3-kinase C2 domain-containing subunit beta isoform X2
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 3-kinase C2 domain-containing subunit beta isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA lysine (anticodon UUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDM4 regulator of p53, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X3
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X9
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X7
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X10
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X17
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X11
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: neurofascin isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: contactin-2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
RB binding protein 5, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
RB binding protein 5, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
RB binding protein 5, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoblastoma-binding protein 5 isoform X1
retinoblastoma-binding protein 5 isoform X2
retinoblastoma-binding protein 5 isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC102156359, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102156359, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102156359, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual serine/threonine and tyrosine protein kinase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
dual serine/threonine and tyrosine protein kinase
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001025268.1
The RefSeq transcript has 74 substitutions, 2 frameshifts, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001020439.1
The RefSeq protein has 19 substitutions, 2 frameshifts, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q4VSN4.1); Region: Disordered. /evidence=ECO:0000256|SAM:MobiDB-lite
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain family 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains protein 2 isoform X4
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain family 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain family 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains protein 2 isoform X1
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain family 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains protein 2 isoform X3
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain family 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains protein 2 isoform X2
NUAK family kinase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
NUAK family kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
NUAK family kinase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
NUAK family SNF1-like kinase 2 isoform X3
NUAK family kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
NUAK family SNF1-like kinase 2 isoform X1
NUAK family SNF1-like kinase 2 isoform X4
NUAK family SNF1-like kinase 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
LEM domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
LEM domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
LEM domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
LEM domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111094509, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094509, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094509, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111094509, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111094509, transcript variant X5
adenylate kinase 2, mitochondrial-like, transcript variant X4
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: adenylate kinase 2, mitochondrial-like
uncharacterized LOC111094510, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
microRNA mir-135b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cyclin dependent kinase 18, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase 18, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase 18, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase 18, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase 18, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 4A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 4A
ETS transcription factor ELK4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
ETS transcription factor ELK4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100688768, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X7
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3 isoform X1
solute carrier family 45 member 3 isoform X3
solute carrier family 45 member 3 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC102151479, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102151479, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102151479, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102151479, transcript variant X4
nuclear casein kinase and cyclin dependent kinase substrate 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear casein kinase and cyclin dependent kinase substrate 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear ubiquitous casein and cyclin-dependent kinase substrate 1 isoform X2
nuclear ubiquitous casein and cyclin-dependent kinase substrate 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 41 member 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 41 member 1 isoform X2
solute carrier family 41 member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 41 member 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 41 member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 41 member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 41 member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 41 member 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-fatty-acyl-amino acid synthase/hydrolase PM20D1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: solute carrier family 26 member 9
RAB7B, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB7B, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB7B, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB7B, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094591, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094591, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094591, transcript variant X3
regulator of hemoglobinization and erythroid cell expansion
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of hemoglobinization and erythroid cell expansion protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111094613, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094613, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094613, transcript variant X2
family with sequence similarity 72 member A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
family with sequence similarity 72 member A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 72 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X4
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X1
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X3
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X2
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X4
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X5
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X6
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X9
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X7
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X8
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X10
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X11
translation initiation factor IF-2-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X7
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X1
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X4
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X10
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon isoform X2
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon isoform X1
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon isoform X3
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon isoform X6
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon isoform X5
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon isoform X4
Ras association domain family member 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras association domain-containing protein 5 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111094619, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094619, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119868031, transcript variant X2
Ras association domain family member 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras association domain-containing protein 5 isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2D; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2D
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001202488.1
The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001189417.1
The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium channel subfamily T member 2 isoform X1
potassium channel subfamily T member 2 isoform X3
potassium channel subfamily T member 2 isoform X2
potassium channel subfamily T member 2 isoform X4
potassium channel subfamily T member 2 isoform X5
potassium channel subfamily T member 2 isoform X6
potassium channel subfamily T member 2 isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094552, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094552, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094554, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094554, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094554, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102153439, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102153439, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102153439, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102153439, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102153439, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102153439, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102153439, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102153439, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111094563, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094563, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094476, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094476, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094580, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC111094538, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111094538, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119868033, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
cell division cycle 73; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
beta-1,3-galactosyltransferase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ro60, Y RNA binding protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ro60, Y RNA binding protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ro60, Y RNA binding protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ro60, Y RNA binding protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ro60, Y RNA binding protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
60 kDa SS-A/Ro ribonucleoprotein isoform X1
60 kDa SS-A/Ro ribonucleoprotein isoform X2
ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L5 isoform X1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L5 isoform X2
ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L5, transcript variant X5
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L5 isoform X3
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L5 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119868013, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119868013, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 13, transcript variant X2
regulator of G protein signaling 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G-protein signaling 1 isoform X4
regulator of G-protein signaling 1 isoform X3
regulator of G-protein signaling 1 isoform X2
regulator of G-protein signaling 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 37% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X47
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X28
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X25
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X40
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X41
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X38
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X54
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X35
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X37
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X33
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X20
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X24
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X43
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X50
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X44
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X45
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X39
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X48
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X26
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X31
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X27
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X23
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X36
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X18
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X19
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X34
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X30
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X22
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X21
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094517, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094517, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X56
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X49
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X42
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X55
uncharacterized LOC102155162, transcript variant X46
uncharacterized LOC111094586, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC106558364, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
BMP/retinoic acid inducible neural specific 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
BMP/retinoic acid inducible neural specific 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
BMP/retinoic acid inducible neural specific 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
BMP/retinoic acid inducible neural specific 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
BMP/retinoic acid-inducible neural-specific protein 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC119877924, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119877924, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 19% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119868014, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119868014, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119868014, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119868014, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094614, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111094614, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094614, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111094614, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111094477, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD3 isoform X1
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD3 isoform X2
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD3 isoform X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X10
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X7
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X21
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X5
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X15
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X13
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X16
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X12
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X14
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X23
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X17
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X19
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X18
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X3
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X20
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X4
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X9
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X22
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X8
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X28
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
estrogen related receptor gamma, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
estrogen-related receptor gamma isoform X5
estrogen-related receptor gamma isoform X2
estrogen-related receptor gamma isoform X1
estrogen-related receptor gamma isoform X3
estrogen-related receptor gamma isoform X4
G-patch domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
G-patch domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
G patch domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
G-patch domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
G patch domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
G-patch domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
G patch domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC102155743, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102155743, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102155743, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
G-patch domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
G patch domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
spermatogenesis associated 17, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis associated 17, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis associated 17, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094593, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094592, transcript variant X4
ribosomal RNA processing 15 homolog, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119868038, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119868038, transcript variant X1
transforming growth factor beta 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming growth factor beta 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming growth factor beta 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming growth factor beta-2 proprotein isoform X1
transforming growth factor beta-2 proprotein isoform X2
transforming growth factor beta-2 proprotein isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC111094577, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094521, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094521, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111094521, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156453, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156453, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156453, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 48% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102156579, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102156645, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 30 member 10, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamyl-prolyl-tRNA synthetase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamyl-prolyl-tRNA synthetase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
bifunctional glutamate/proline--tRNA ligase isoform X6
bifunctional glutamate/proline--tRNA ligase isoform X5
3'(2'), 5'-bisphosphate nucleotidase 1, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: 3'(2'),5'-bisphosphate nucleotidase 1 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins
isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoleucine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial isoform X1
microRNA mir-215; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA mir-194; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RAB3 GTPase activating non-catalytic protein subunit 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating non-catalytic protein subunit 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating non-catalytic protein subunit 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating non-catalytic protein subunit 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
rab3 GTPase-activating protein non-catalytic subunit isoform X3
rab3 GTPase-activating protein non-catalytic subunit isoform X2
rab3 GTPase-activating protein non-catalytic subunit isoform X1
proteasome subunit alpha type-1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
microRNA mir-664; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP synthase subunit f, mitochondrial-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094612, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094612, transcript variant X1
microtubule affinity regulating kinase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule affinity regulating kinase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule affinity regulating kinase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule affinity regulating kinase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule affinity regulating kinase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule affinity regulating kinase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase MARK1 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase MARK1 isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase MARK1 isoform X3
serine/threonine-protein kinase MARK1 isoform X4
serine/threonine-protein kinase MARK1 isoform X5
serine/threonine-protein kinase MARK1 isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 15% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119868046, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119868048, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119868048, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119868048, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119868048, transcript variant X4
mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component 2 isoform X2
mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component 2 isoform X1
mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component 2 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial amidoxime-reducing component 1 isoform X2
mitochondrial amidoxime-reducing component 1 isoform X1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00619
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
crossover junction endonuclease MUS81-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: crossover junction endonuclease MUS81-like
uncharacterized LOC111094505, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094505, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094583, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094583, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC106558351, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC106558351, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151727, transcript variant X1
transfer RNA threonine (anticodon UGU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TATA-box binding protein associated factor, RNA polymerase I subunit A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
TATA-box binding protein associated factor, RNA polymerase I subunit A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
TATA-box binding protein associated factor, RNA polymerase I subunit A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
TATA-box binding protein associated factor, RNA polymerase I subunit A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
TATA box-binding protein-associated factor RNA polymerase I subunit A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC111094502, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
MIA SH3 domain ER export factor 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
MIA SH3 domain ER export factor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
MIA SH3 domain ER export factor 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
transport and Golgi organization protein 1 homolog isoform X2
transport and Golgi organization protein 1 homolog isoform X9
MIA SH3 domain ER export factor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
MIA SH3 domain ER export factor 3, transcript variant X3
MIA SH3 domain ER export factor 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
MIA SH3 domain ER export factor 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
transport and Golgi organization protein 1 homolog isoform X1
transport and Golgi organization protein 1 homolog isoform X4
transport and Golgi organization protein 1 homolog isoform X3
transport and Golgi organization protein 1 homolog isoform X6
transport and Golgi organization protein 1 homolog isoform X5
uncharacterized LOC119868052, transcript variant X4
MIA SH3 domain ER export factor 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
MIA SH3 domain ER export factor 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transport and Golgi organization protein 1 homolog isoform X7
transport and Golgi organization protein 1 homolog isoform X8
uncharacterized LOC119868053, transcript variant X1
axin interactor, dorsalization associated
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
axin interactor, dorsalization-associated protein
BRO1 domain and CAAX motif containing, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
BRO1 domain and CAAX motif containing, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
BRO1 domain and CAAX motif containing, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 177 member B, transcript variant X1
family with sequence similarity 177 member B, transcript variant X54
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 177 member B, transcript variant X49
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 177 member B, transcript variant X50
family with sequence similarity 177 member B, transcript variant X51
family with sequence similarity 177 member B, transcript variant X52
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 177 member B, transcript variant X53
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 177 member B, transcript variant X55
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
flavin-containing monooxygenase 5-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 60% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
flavin-containing monooxygenase 5-like isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094532, transcript variant X2
family with sequence similarity 78 member B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 78 member B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
microRNA mir-8798; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium load-activated calcium channel isoform X1
calcium load-activated calcium channel isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: AP-4 complex subunit sigma-1-like
aldehyde dehydrogenase 9 family member A1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
4-trimethylaminobutyraldehyde dehydrogenase
uncharacterized LOC102152865, transcript variant X1
microsomal glutathione S-transferase 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
leucine rich repeat containing 52, transcript variant X2
leucine rich repeat containing 52, transcript variant X3
leucine rich repeat containing 52, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 52 isoform X1
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 52 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X18
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X23
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X25
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X17
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X21
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X27
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X20
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X29
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X19
uncharacterized LOC102152982, transcript variant X22
retinoid X receptor gamma, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoic acid receptor RXR-gamma isoform X3
retinoid X receptor gamma, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoid X receptor gamma, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoid X receptor gamma, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoic acid receptor RXR-gamma isoform X1
retinoic acid receptor RXR-gamma isoform X2
retinoid X receptor gamma, transcript variant X6
retinoid X receptor gamma, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoic acid receptor RXR-gamma isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha
LIM homeobox transcription factor 1-alpha
uncharacterized LOC102153440, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102153440, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102153382, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 1 isoform X1
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 1 isoform X8
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 1 isoform X3
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 1 isoform X4
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 1 isoform X5
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 1 isoform X6
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: methylsterol monooxygenase 1-like
uncharacterized LOC111094595, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094595, transcript variant X1
NUF2 component of NDC80 kinetochore complex, transcript variant X4
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: kinetochore protein Nuf2 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111094534, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094534, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC111094534, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC111094534, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094534, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G-protein signaling 4 isoform X1
regulator of G protein signaling 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
regulator of G-protein signaling 4 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
coiled-coil domain containing 190, transcript variant X4
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: coiled-coil domain-containing protein 190 isoform X2
hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 7, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-keto-steroid reductase/17-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 7 isoform X1
hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 7, transcript variant X6
hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-keto-steroid reductase/17-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 7 isoform X2
3-keto-steroid reductase/17-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 7 isoform X3
hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 7, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2, transcript variant X6
discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2 isoform X2
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2 isoform X1
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2 isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC111094605, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC111094605, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111094605, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111094605, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111094605, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC111094605, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094605, transcript variant X2
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase 1, transcript variant X1
UDP-N-acetylhexosamine pyrophosphorylase isoform X2
UDP-N-acetylhexosamine pyrophosphorylase isoform X1
UDP-N-acetylhexosamine pyrophosphorylase isoform X3
U2AF homology motif kinase 1, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: serine/threonine-protein kinase Kist isoform X2
SH2 domain containing 1B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C1orf226 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C1orf226 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C1orf226 homolog, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized protein C1orf226 homolog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C1orf226 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nitric oxide synthase 1 adaptor protein, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: carboxyl-terminal PDZ ligand of neuronal nitric oxide synthase protein isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111094523, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094523, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094516, transcript variant X1
activating transcription factor 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
activating transcription factor 6, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclic AMP-dependent transcription factor ATF-6 alpha isoform X3
cyclic AMP-dependent transcription factor ATF-6 alpha isoform X4
Fc receptor like B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor like B, transcript variant X4
Fc receptor like B, transcript variant X1
Fc receptor like B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIb, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIb, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIb, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIb, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIb, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIb, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-b isoform X3
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-b isoform X1
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-b isoform X4
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-b isoform X2
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-b isoform X5
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-like, transcript variant X14
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-like isoform X4
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
high affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc receptor I isoform X5
high affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc receptor I isoform X6
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III isoform X3
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III isoform X4
transfer RNA asparagine (anticodon GUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA aspartic acid (anticodon GUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA glycine (anticodon UCC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA leucine (anticodon CAG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA glycine (anticodon GCC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon CUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon UUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA valine (anticodon CAC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
uncharacterized LOC119868062, transcript variant X1
cilia and flagella associated protein 126, transcript variant X1
cilia and flagella associated protein 126, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 126, transcript variant X2
succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit C
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 147 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
succinate dehydrogenase cytochrome b560 subunit, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3, transcript variant X2
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3 isoform X1
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3 isoform X2
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3 isoform X3
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 40 like, transcript variant X2
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 40 like, transcript variant X1
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 40 like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM40B isoform X2
mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM40B isoform X1
apolipoprotein A2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Fc fragment of IgE receptor Ig; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high affinity immunoglobulin epsilon receptor subunit gamma precursor
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit S2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 76 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur protein 2, mitochondrial isoform X1
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 4
beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 3, transcript variant X3
beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 3 isoform X1
protoporphyrinogen oxidase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
protoporphyrinogen oxidase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
protoporphyrinogen oxidase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 21
ubiquitin-fold modifier conjugating enzyme 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin-fold modifier-conjugating enzyme 1
death effector domain containing, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
death effector domain containing, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
death effector domain containing, transcript variant X2
death effector domain containing, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
death effector domain containing, transcript variant X3
death effector domain containing, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
death effector domain containing, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
death effector domain-containing protein isoform X1
death effector domain-containing protein isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
deaminated glutathione amidase isoform X2
deaminated glutathione amidase isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
nectin cell adhesion molecule 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001313853.1
The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Rho GTPase activating protein 30, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 30 isoform X1
Rho GTPase activating protein 30, transcript variant X2
rho GTPase-activating protein 30 isoform X2
upstream transcription factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
upstream transcription factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
upstream transcription factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
upstream stimulatory factor 1 isoform X1
upstream transcription factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
upstream stimulatory factor 1 isoform X2
thiosulfate sulfurtransferase like domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
thiosulfate:glutathione sulfurtransferase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
lymphocyte antigen 9, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
lymphocyte antigen 9, transcript variant X1
lymphocyte antigen 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
lymphocyte antigen 9, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
lymphocyte antigen 9, transcript variant X4
T-lymphocyte surface antigen Ly-9 isoform X6
T-lymphocyte surface antigen Ly-9 isoform X2
T-lymphocyte surface antigen Ly-9 isoform X5
T-lymphocyte surface antigen Ly-9 isoform X1
T-lymphocyte surface antigen Ly-9 isoform X4
lymphocyte antigen 9, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-lymphocyte surface antigen Ly-9 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAM family member 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAM family member 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAM family member 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001003084.1
signaling lymphocytic activation molecule precursor
N-linked (GlcNAc...) asparagine. /evidence=ECO:0000255; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q95MM9.1); glycosylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q95MM9.1); transmembrane region
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q95MM9.1); Region: ITSM 1. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q13291
Phosphotyrosine, by FYN. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q13291; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q95MM9.1); phosphorylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q95MM9.1); Region: SH2-binding. /evidence=ECO:0000255
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q95MM9.1); Region: ITSM 2. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q13291
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAM family member 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAM family member 6, transcript variant X3
SLAM family member 6, transcript variant X2
SLAM family member 6, transcript variant X4
SLAM family member 6, transcript variant X5
SLAM family member 6, transcript variant X6
SLAM family member 6, transcript variant X8
SLAM family member 6, transcript variant X7
VANGL planar cell polarity protein 2, transcript variant X1
VANGL planar cell polarity protein 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
VANGL planar cell polarity protein 2, transcript variant X2
collagen alpha-1(I) chain-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
collagen alpha-1(I) chain-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nicastrin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001313840.1
The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions, 1 frameshift, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001300769.1
COPI coat complex subunit alpha, transcript variant X8
COPI coat complex subunit alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
COPI coat complex subunit alpha, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
COPI coat complex subunit alpha, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 19, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 19, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 19 isoform X1
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 19 isoform X2
DDB1 and CUL4 associated factor 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
DDB1 and CUL4 associated factor 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
DDB1 and CUL4 associated factor 8, transcript variant X3
proliferation and apoptosis adaptor protein 15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
proliferation and apoptosis adaptor protein 15, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 154 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-2 isoform X4
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-2 isoform X3
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-4 isoform X1
ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-4 isoform X10
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-4 isoform X8
ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-4 isoform X9
ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-4 isoform X7
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-4 isoform X5
ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X6
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-4 isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 138 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-2 isoform X13
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-2 isoform X12
uncharacterized LOC119868074, transcript variant X7
immunoglobulin superfamily member 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 8 isoform X3
immunoglobulin superfamily member 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 8 isoform X1
immunoglobulin superfamily member 8 isoform X2
potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-activated inward rectifier potassium channel 3
uncharacterized LOC111094550, transcript variant X1
potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-sensitive inward rectifier potassium channel 10 isoform X1
ATP-sensitive inward rectifier potassium channel 10 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SLAM family member 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001302665.1
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001289594.1
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
immunoglobulin superfamily member 9, transcript variant X4
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein turtle homolog A isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 45, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 45 isoform X2
cilia and flagella associated protein 45, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 45 isoform X1
V-set and immunoglobulin domain containing 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
V-set and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein 8
uncharacterized LOC119868077, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119868077, transcript variant X7
SLAM family member 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor like 6, transcript variant X1
Fc receptor like 6, transcript variant X10
Fc receptor like 6, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC111094607, transcript variant X3
dual specificity phosphatase 23, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 23, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 23, transcript variant X6
dual specificity protein phosphatase 23 isoform X4
dual specificity protein phosphatase 23 isoform X1
dual specificity protein phosphatase 23 isoform X6
dual specificity phosphatase 23, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 23, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity protein phosphatase 23 isoform X3
dual specificity protein phosphatase 23 isoform X2
dual specificity phosphatase 23, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity protein phosphatase 23 isoform X5
C-reactive protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001314116.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001301045.1
uncharacterized LOC111094527, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC111094527, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111094527, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094527, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094527, transcript variant X4
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily J member 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily J member 14
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388780.1
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001375709.1
The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor 10J5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily J member 24, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily J member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily J member 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388778.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001375707.1
uncharacterized LOC119877933, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119877933, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily AJ member 1, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily J member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily J member 2 isoform X1
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily J member 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily J member 8
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001389196.1
Fc fragment of IgE receptor Ia; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001110766.2
high affinity immunoglobulin epsilon receptor subunit alpha precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
atypical chemokine receptor 1 isoform X2
cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon UCU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
uncharacterized LOC111094466, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094466, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094466, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111094466, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC111094466, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111094466, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized protein LOC111094466 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111094466, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094466, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094466, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen, transcript variant X2
myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon-activable protein 203 isoform X3
pyrin and HIN domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen isoform X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen
uncharacterized LOC119877934, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119877934, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119877934, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119877934, transcript variant X3
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily AA member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily AA member 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001389019.1
The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001375948.1
The RefSeq protein has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily AA member 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily AA member 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388777.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001375706.1
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily N member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily N member 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001313866.1
The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001300795.1
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily N member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily N member 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001313868.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001300797.1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily K member 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily K member 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388891.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001375820.1
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily K member 4, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: olfactory receptor 6K3 isoform X1
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily K member 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily K member 8
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388894.1
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily K member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily K member 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388896.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001375825.1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily Z member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily Z member 1
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily X member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily X member 1
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily P member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily P member 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001313856.1
olfactory receptor family 6 subfamily Y member 1, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily R member 6, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily R member 3C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily R member 3C
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388898.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001375827.1
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily K member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily K member 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388774.1
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily T member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily T member 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388902.1
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily K member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily K member 2
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily T member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily T member 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1e, membrane-associated
CD1b molecule; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001130830.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001124302.1
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1b precursor
CD1c molecule; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001128836.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001122308.1
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1c precursor
CD1a8 protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001128838.1
The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions and aligns at 99% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001122310.1
The RefSeq protein has 3 substitutions and aligns at 99% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CD1a6 molecule; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001128837.1
The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001122309.1
The RefSeq protein has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1a6 precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 29% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1a, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1a, transcript variant X3
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1a, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1a isoform X3
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1a isoform X1
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1a isoform X2
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1b-like, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1b-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
antigen-presenting glycoprotein CD1d isoform X1
antigen-presenting glycoprotein CD1d isoform X2
kirre like nephrin family adhesion molecule 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
kirre like nephrin family adhesion molecule 1, transcript variant X1
nuclear pore complex protein NUP98A-like, transcript variant X24
nuclear pore complex protein NUP98A-like, transcript variant X22
nuclear pore complex protein NUP98A-like, transcript variant X1
nuclear pore complex protein NUP98A-like, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear pore complex protein NUP98A-like, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear pore complex protein NUP98A-like, transcript variant X2
nuclear pore complex protein NUP98A-like, transcript variant X3
nuclear pore complex protein NUP98A-like, transcript variant X25
nuclear pore complex protein NUP98A-like, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized protein LOC111094485 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC111094485 isoform X6
nuclear pore complex protein NUP98A-like isoform X5
coiled-coil domain containing 185, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 185 isoform X1
sushi domain containing 4, transcript variant X4
sushi domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
toll like receptor 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001197176.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001184105.1
dispatched RND transporter family member 1, transcript variant X6
dispatched RND transporter family member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
dispatched RND transporter family member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
dispatched RND transporter family member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dispatched RND transporter family member 1, transcript variant X5
dispatched RND transporter family member 1, transcript variant X2
dispatched RND transporter family member 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
dispatched RND transporter family member 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
dispatched RND transporter family member 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094535, transcript variant X4