Canis lupus familiaris isolate Mischka breed German Shepherd chromosome 35, alternate assembly UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Laurasiatheria; Carnivora; Caniformia; Canidae; Canis.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM021996.1.\nAssembly name: UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Uppsala University on\n2020/03/10. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession JAAHUQ000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Uppsala University\nAssembly Date :: JUN-2019\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 0.5.0\nAssembly Name :: UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 100.0x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel; Hi-C\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Canis lupus familiaris Annotation\n Release 106\nAnnotation Version :: 106\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.5\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
scaffold protein involved in DNA repair, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
scaffold protein involved in DNA repair, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
scaffold protein involved in DNA repair, transcript variant X3
scaffold protein involved in DNA repair, transcript variant X1
scaffold protein involved in DNA repair, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
scaffold protein involved in DNA repair, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
scaffold protein involved in DNA repair, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
scaffold protein involved in DNA repair, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA repair-scaffolding protein isoform X4
DNA repair-scaffolding protein isoform X10
DNA repair-scaffolding protein isoform X9
DNA repair-scaffolding protein isoform X6
DNA repair-scaffolding protein isoform X2
DNA repair-scaffolding protein isoform X3
DNA repair-scaffolding protein isoform X5
DNA repair-scaffolding protein isoform X1
scaffold protein involved in DNA repair, transcript variant X8
scaffold protein involved in DNA repair, transcript variant X7
DNA repair-scaffolding protein isoform X8
DNA repair-scaffolding protein isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
uncharacterized LOC111094066, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094066, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094066, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111094066, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins
dual specificity phosphatase 22, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 22, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity protein phosphatase 22 isoform X1
dual specificity protein phosphatase 22 isoform X3
dual specificity phosphatase 22, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity protein phosphatase 22 isoform X2
interferon regulatory factor 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon regulatory factor 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon regulatory factor 4 isoform X6
interferon regulatory factor 4 isoform X7
uncharacterized LOC119867595, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094051, transcript variant X1
exocyst complex component 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
exocyst complex component 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
exocyst complex component 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
exocyst complex component 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
exocyst complex component 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
exocyst complex component 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
exocyst complex component 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867634, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867634, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: forkhead box protein Q1-like
uncharacterized LOC111094018, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094018, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione peroxidase 8 (putative) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
myosin light chain kinase family member 4, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin light chain kinase family member 4, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
myosin light chain kinase family member 4, transcript variant X15
myosin light chain kinase family member 4, transcript variant X16
myosin light chain kinase family member 4 isoform X17
myosin light chain kinase family member 4 isoform X14
myosin light chain kinase family member 4 isoform X15
myosin light chain kinase family member 4 isoform X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867601, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111094000, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094000, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094000, transcript variant X3
serpin family B member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin family B member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin family B member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin family B member 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin family B member 9, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin family B member 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin family B member 9, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867635, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867635, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867635, transcript variant X2
serpin family B member 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin family B member 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin family B member 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094029, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094029, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111094029, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102151896, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102151896, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102151896, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102151896, transcript variant X1
N-ribosyldihydronicotinamide:quinone reductase 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosyldihydronicotinamide dehydrogenase [quinone]
receptor interacting serine/threonine kinase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor interacting serine/threonine kinase 1, transcript variant X2
receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 isoform X1
receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 isoform X2
60S ribosomal protein L39, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
60S ribosomal protein L39, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
60S ribosomal protein L39, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC100687285 isoform X1
biphenyl hydrolase like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
biphenyl hydrolase like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
biphenyl hydrolase like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 524 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 29% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 515 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867603, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 22 member 23, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 22 member 23, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 22 member 23 isoform X2
solute carrier family 22 member 23 isoform X1
solute carrier family 22 member 23, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 22 member 23, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 22 member 23 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 22 member 23, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 22 member 23 isoform X3
solute carrier family 22 member 23, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 22 member 23 isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC119867637, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC106558273, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
PX domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
PX domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
PX domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
PX domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
PX domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
PX domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit, ATPase, 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC106557518, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106557518, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106557518, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 4B, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 4B, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 4B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 4B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 4B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 4B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 4B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 4B, transcript variant X8
pre-mRNA processing factor 4B, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 4B, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 4B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 4B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase PRP4 homolog isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase PRP4 homolog isoform X2
family with sequence similarity 217 member A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 217 member A, transcript variant X2
family with sequence similarity 217 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 217 member A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 217 member A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 217 member A, transcript variant X4
family with sequence similarity 217 member A, transcript variant X3
family with sequence similarity 217 member A, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 217 member A, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 35 C6orf201 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 35 C6orf201 homolog, transcript variant X4
chromosome 35 C6orf201 homolog, transcript variant X5
chromosome 35 C6orf201 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 35 C6orf201 homolog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 35 C6orf201 homolog, transcript variant X6
chromosome 35 C6orf201 homolog, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C6orf201 homolog isoform X1
enoyl-CoA delta isomerase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
enoyl-CoA delta isomerase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
enoyl-CoA delta isomerase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
enoyl-CoA delta isomerase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
enoyl-CoA delta isomerase 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111094026, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094026, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: short coiled-coil protein B-like
uncharacterized LOC100682564, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC100682564, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC100682564, transcript variant X2
chromodomain Y like, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromodomain Y like, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromodomain Y like, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromodomain Y like, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromodomain Y like, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromodomain Y like, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromodomain Y like, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribonuclease P/MRP subunit p40, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribonuclease P/MRP subunit p40, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribonuclease P/MRP subunit p40, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribonuclease P protein subunit p40 isoform X1
ribonuclease P protein subunit p40 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC100682707, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100682707, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100682707, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3G, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 25% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3G isoform X1
LYR motif containing 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
LYR motif-containing protein 4 isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 59% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LYR motif containing 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
LYR motif containing 4, transcript variant X2
LYR motif containing 4, transcript variant X1
LYR motif-containing protein 4 isoform X2
LYR motif-containing protein 4 isoform X6
LYR motif-containing protein 4 isoform X1
LYR motif containing 4, transcript variant X3
LYR motif-containing protein 4 isoform X3
LYR motif containing 4, transcript variant X5
LYR motif containing 4, transcript variant X4
LYR motif-containing protein 4 isoform X4
LYR motif containing 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
LYR motif-containing protein 4 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X1
phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X4
phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X12
phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X3
phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
phenylalanine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial isoform X2
phenylalanine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC102154953, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102154953, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119867641, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867641, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093977, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093977, transcript variant X1
coagulation factor XIII A chain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
coagulation factor XIII A chain, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC102155370, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155370, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867645, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867645, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867645, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867645, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102155538, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102155538, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102155538, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102155572, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102155572, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102155572, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102155572, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102155572, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102155572, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155572, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102155572, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102155572, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC102155572, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102155572, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102155572, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111094020, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111094020, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094020, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein LOC111094020 isoform X3
uncharacterized protein LOC111094020 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC111094020 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras responsive element binding protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras responsive element binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras responsive element binding protein 1, transcript variant X9
ras responsive element binding protein 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras responsive element binding protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras responsive element binding protein 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras responsive element binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras responsive element binding protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras responsive element binding protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras responsive element binding protein 1, transcript variant X4
ras responsive element binding protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras-responsive element-binding protein 1 isoform X3
ras-responsive element-binding protein 1 isoform X1
ras-responsive element-binding protein 1 isoform X4
ras-responsive element-binding protein 1 isoform X2
ras-responsive element-binding protein 1 isoform X5
signal sequence receptor subunit 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
translocon-associated protein subunit alpha precursor
COORDINATES: ab initio prediction:SignalP:4.0
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P16967.1); Region: Disordered. /evidence=ECO:0000256|SAM:MobiDB-lite
N-linked (GlcNAc...) asparagine. /evidence=ECO:0000255; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P16967.1); glycosylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P16967.1); transmembrane region
Phosphoserine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P43307; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P16967.1); phosphorylation site
Phosphothreonine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P43307; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P16967.1); phosphorylation site
uncharacterized LOC111094040, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094040, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
cancer antigen 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
cancer antigen 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cancer-associated gene 1 protein isoform X8
cancer-associated gene 1 protein isoform X7
cancer-associated gene 1 protein isoform X5
cancer-associated gene 1 protein isoform X6
cancer-associated gene 1 protein isoform X2
cancer-associated gene 1 protein isoform X4
cancer-associated gene 1 protein isoform X1
cancer-associated gene 1 protein isoform X3
cancer-associated gene 1 protein isoform X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase RIO1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase RIO1 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC119867608, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein U11/U12 subunit 48
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
U11/U12 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein 48 kDa protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
thioredoxin domain containing 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
thioredoxin domain containing 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
thioredoxin domain-containing protein 5 isoform X1
thioredoxin domain-containing protein 5 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X19
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X17
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X20
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 1 subunit 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106558258, transcript variant X21
biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 1 subunit 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 1 subunit 5, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 1 subunit 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 subunit 5 isoform X2
biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 1 subunit 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 subunit 5 isoform X1
biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 1 subunit 5, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 1 subunit 5, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 subunit 5 isoform X4
biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 1 subunit 5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 subunit 5 isoform X3
eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 epsilon 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 epsilon-1 isoform X1
eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 epsilon 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 epsilon-1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
solute carrier family 35 member B3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member B3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member B3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member B3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member B3, transcript variant X4
solute carrier family 35 member B3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member B3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine 3'-phospho 5'-phosphosulfate transporter 2 isoform X2
adenosine 3'-phospho 5'-phosphosulfate transporter 2 isoform X1
adenosine 3'-phospho 5'-phosphosulfate transporter 2 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nudE nuclear distribution gene E homolog 1 (A. nidulans) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 48% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC111094068, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094068, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111094068, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094068, transcript variant X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111094023, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094023, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094021, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111094021, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111094021, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111094021, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094021, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094021, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC111093987, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein LOC111093987 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102151138, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102151138, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102151138, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151138, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102151138, transcript variant X4
transcription factor AP-2 alpha, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor AP-2 alpha, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor AP-2 alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor AP-2 alpha, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor AP-2-alpha isoform X4
transcription factor AP-2-alpha isoform X2
transcription factor AP-2-alpha isoform X1
transcription factor AP-2-alpha isoform X3
transcription factor AP-2 alpha, transcript variant X5
transcription factor AP-2-alpha isoform X5
glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 2 (I blood group), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 2 (I blood group), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 2 (I blood group), transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 2 (I blood group), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-acetyllactosaminide beta-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyl-transferase isoform X2
N-acetyllactosaminide beta-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyl-transferase isoform X4
N-acetyllactosaminide beta-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyl-transferase isoform X5
N-acetyllactosaminide beta-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyl-transferase isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA lysine (anticodon CUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 2 (I blood group), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 22 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-acetyllactosaminide beta-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyl-transferase isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC119867650, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867650, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867650, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119867650, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867650, transcript variant X4
glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 2 (I blood group), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-acetyllactosaminide beta-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyl-transferase isoform X1
chromosome 35 C6orf52 homolog, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
putative uncharacterized protein C6orf52 homolog isoform X4
p21-activated protein kinase-interacting protein 1
transmembrane protein 14C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 14C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
male germ cell associated kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
male germ cell associated kinase, transcript variant X1
male germ cell associated kinase, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
male germ cell associated kinase, transcript variant X3
male germ cell associated kinase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
male germ cell associated kinase, transcript variant X5
male germ cell associated kinase, transcript variant X4
serine/threonine-protein kinase MAK isoform X4
serine/threonine-protein kinase MAK isoform X3
serine/threonine-protein kinase MAK isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase MAK isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111094043, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094043, transcript variant X1
glial cells missing transcription factor 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chorion-specific transcription factor GCMb
synaptonemal complex protein 2 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
synaptonemal complex protein 2 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
synaptonemal complex protein 2 like, transcript variant X3
synaptonemal complex protein 2-like isoform X1
synaptonemal complex protein 2-like isoform X2
synaptonemal complex protein 2 like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
synaptonemal complex protein 2-like isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ELOVL fatty acid elongase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
ELOVL fatty acid elongase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ELOVL fatty acid elongase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 2 isoform X4
elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 2 isoform X2
elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 2 isoform X3
small integral membrane protein 13, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
small integral membrane protein 13 isoform X1
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094048, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094048, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094049, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 170B, transcript variant X3
transmembrane protein 170B, transcript variant X4
transmembrane protein 170B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 170B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
androgen dependent TFPI regulating protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
androgen-dependent TFPI-regulating protein
uncharacterized LOC111094013, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094013, transcript variant X1
HIVEP zinc finger 1, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein 40 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111094072, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094072, transcript variant X1
endothelin 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001002956.1
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution, 1 frameshift, 5 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001002956.1
The RefSeq protein has 1 frameshift compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P13206.2); Region: Disordered. /evidence=ECO:0000256|SAM:MobiDB-lite
Cleavage, by KEL. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P05305; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P13206.2); cleavage site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P13206.2); Region: Endothelin-like
uncharacterized LOC119867614, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867614, transcript variant X2
phosphatase and actin regulator 1, transcript variant X10
phosphatase and actin regulator 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 1, transcript variant X2
phosphatase and actin regulator 1, transcript variant X3
phosphatase and actin regulator 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 1 isoform X7
phosphatase and actin regulator 1 isoform X9
phosphatase and actin regulator 1 isoform X6
phosphatase and actin regulator 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 1 isoform X8
phosphatase and actin regulator 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 1 isoform X10
phosphatase and actin regulator 1 isoform X11
uncharacterized LOC111094005, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094005, transcript variant X2
TBC1 domain family member 7, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 7, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 75 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 7, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 75 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 75 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 7, transcript variant X2
TBC1 domain family member 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 78 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 75 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
glucose-fructose oxidoreductase domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
glucose-fructose oxidoreductase domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
glucose-fructose oxidoreductase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
glucose-fructose oxidoreductase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 34% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sirtuin 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001313805.1
The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001300734.1
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NAD-dependent protein deacylase sirtuin-5, mitochondrial
Mitochondrion. /evidence=ECO:0000255|HAMAP-Rule:MF_03160; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (E2RDZ6.1)
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial calcium uniporter regulator 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: mitochondrial calcium uniporter regulator 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102154515, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102154515, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102154515, transcript variant X3
ring finger protein 182, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 182, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 182, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 182, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 182, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC111094001, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867616, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867616, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102154852, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102154852, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102154852, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102154852, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102154955, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102154955, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102154955, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102154955, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC106558255, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC106558255, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC106558255, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106558255, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
jumonji and AT-rich interaction domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
jumonji and AT-rich interaction domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
jumonji and AT-rich interaction domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00004
myosin regulatory light chain interacting protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106558256, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111093978, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102155759, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102155759, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155759, transcript variant X3
stathmin domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
stathmin domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
stathmin domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
stathmin domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
stathmin domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
stathmin domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
stathmin domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclase associated actin cytoskeleton regulatory protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
family with sequence similarity 8 member A1, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein FAM8A1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear pore complex protein Nup153 isoform X1
nuclear pore complex protein Nup153 isoform X2
kinesin family member 13A, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 13A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 13A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 13A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 13A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 13A, transcript variant X4
kinesin family member 13A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 13A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 Proteins, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
NHL repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NHL repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001006649.1
The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions, 1 frameshift compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001006650.1
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution, 1 frameshift compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
thiopurine S-methyltransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
N6-acetyllysine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P51580; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q8HX86.1); acetylation site
lysine demethylase 1B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine demethylase 1B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00408
DEK proto-oncogene, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
DEK proto-oncogene, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867664, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867664, transcript variant X1
ring finger protein 144B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 144B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6B1-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102156770, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156770, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093969, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156827, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102156827, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156827, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102156827, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102156827, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102156827, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102156827, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156827, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102156827, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC102156827, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102156827, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094007, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094007, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094064, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094064, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867668, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119867668, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867668, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867668, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized protein LOC119867668 isoform X6
uncharacterized protein LOC119867668 isoform X7
uncharacterized protein LOC119867668 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC119867668 isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC119867668, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119867668, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867668, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC119867668, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized protein LOC119867668 isoform X8
uncharacterized protein LOC119867668 isoform X5
uncharacterized protein LOC119867668 isoform X3
uncharacterized protein LOC119867668 isoform X1
membrane bound O-acyltransferase domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane bound O-acyltransferase domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane bound O-acyltransferase domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysophospholipid acyltransferase 1 isoform X1
lysophospholipid acyltransferase 1 isoform X2
lysophospholipid acyltransferase 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDK5 regulatory subunit associated protein 1 like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CDK5 regulatory subunit associated protein 1 like 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001284447.1
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
threonylcarbamoyladenosine tRNA methylthiotransferase
uncharacterized LOC106558263, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC106558263, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins
SRY-box transcription factor 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
prolactin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001008275.2
The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
hepatoma-derived growth factor-like protein 1
uncharacterized LOC111094069, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094069, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151835, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102151835, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102151835, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151835, transcript variant X4
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00015
uncharacterized LOC111094009, transcript variant X24
uncharacterized LOC111094009, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111094009, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC111094009, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111094009, transcript variant X25
uncharacterized LOC111094009, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: doublecortin domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC100682639, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC100682639, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
magnesium transporter MRS2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
magnesium transporter MRS2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
magnesium transporter MRS2 homolog, mitochondrial
glycosylphosphatidylinositol specific phospholipase D1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosylphosphatidylinositol specific phospholipase D1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosylphosphatidylinositol specific phospholipase D1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific phospholipase D isoform X2
phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific phospholipase D isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific phospholipase D isoform X3
glycosylphosphatidylinositol specific phospholipase D1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosylphosphatidylinositol specific phospholipase D1, transcript variant X5
aldehyde dehydrogenase 5 family member A1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
dyslexia-associated protein KIAA0319 homolog isoform X2
dyslexia-associated protein KIAA0319 homolog isoform X1
dyslexia-associated protein KIAA0319 homolog isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
acyl-CoA thioesterase 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
acyl-CoA thioesterase 13, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
acyl-coenzyme A thioesterase 13 isoform X1
acyl-CoA thioesterase 13, transcript variant X3
acyl-coenzyme A thioesterase 13 isoform X2
chromosome 35 C6orf62 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 35 C6orf62 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C6orf62 homolog isoform X2
uncharacterized protein C6orf62 homolog isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102153227, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
geminin DNA replication inhibitor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
geminin DNA replication inhibitor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
geminin DNA replication inhibitor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
armadillo like helical domain containing 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
armadillo-like helical domain-containing protein 2
RHO family interacting cell polarization regulator 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
RHO family interacting cell polarization regulator 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
RHO family interacting cell polarization regulator 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
RHO family interacting cell polarization regulator 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
RHO family interacting cell polarization regulator 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho family-interacting cell polarization regulator 2 isoform X1
rho family-interacting cell polarization regulator 2 isoform X2
rho family-interacting cell polarization regulator 2 isoform X3
RHO family interacting cell polarization regulator 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho family-interacting cell polarization regulator 2 isoform X4
cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase isoform X2
cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase isoform X1
cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase isoform X3
cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase isoform X4
cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase isoform X5
translation initiation factor IF-2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
capping protein regulator and myosin 1 linker 1, transcript variant X1
capping protein regulator and myosin 1 linker 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
capping protein regulator and myosin 1 linker 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
F-actin-uncapping protein LRRC16A isoform X1
F-actin-uncapping protein LRRC16A isoform X2
F-actin-uncapping protein LRRC16A isoform X3
capping protein regulator and myosin 1 linker 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
F-actin-uncapping protein LRRC16A isoform X4
secretagogin, EF-hand calcium binding protein, transcript variant X2
secretagogin, EF-hand calcium binding protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00099
H2A clustered histone 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 126 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H2B clustered histone 1, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 79 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: histone H2B type 1-A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 130 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 90 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
solute carrier family 17 member 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 4 bases at 4 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: probable small intestine urate exporter
solute carrier family 17 member 1, transcript variant X5
solute carrier family 17 member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 17 member 1, transcript variant X4
solute carrier family 17 member 1, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 17 member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 17 member 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 1 isoform X1
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 1 isoform X2
solute carrier family 17 member 1, transcript variant X11
solute carrier family 17 member 1, transcript variant X8
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 1 isoform X6
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 1 isoform X3
solute carrier family 17 member 3, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 17 member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 17 member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 4 isoform X2
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 4 isoform X3
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 4 isoform X1
solute carrier family 17 member 2, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 17 member 2, transcript variant X17
solute carrier family 17 member 2, transcript variant X13
solute carrier family 17 member 2, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 17 member 2, transcript variant X15
solute carrier family 17 member 2, transcript variant X16
solute carrier family 17 member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 17 member 2, transcript variant X1
solute carrier family 17 member 2, transcript variant X2
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 3 isoform X8
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 3 isoform X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tripartite motif containing 38, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867682, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867682, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM38 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
H1.1 linker histone, cluster member, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H3 clustered histone 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 483 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 354 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 497 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 164 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 135 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 174 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
homeostatic iron regulator, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
homeostatic iron regulator, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
homeostatic iron regulator, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
homeostatic iron regulator, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
homeostatic iron regulator, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
homeostatic iron regulator, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
hereditary hemochromatosis protein isoform X1
hereditary hemochromatosis protein isoform X2
hereditary hemochromatosis protein isoform X4
hereditary hemochromatosis protein isoform X3
homeostatic iron regulator, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
homeostatic iron regulator, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
hereditary hemochromatosis protein isoform X5
uncharacterized LOC111093991, transcript variant X1
H1.6 linker histone, cluster member, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
H2B clustered histone 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 138 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
H2B clustered histone 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 139 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 175 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
H1.4 linker histone, cluster member, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
histone H2B type 1-C/E/F/G/I, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 145 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone H2B type 1-C/E/F/G/I, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 145 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone H2B type 1-C/E/F/G/I, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 145 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone H2B type 1-C/E/F/G/I, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 145 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone H2B type 1-C/E/F/G/I, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 145 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone H2B type 1-C/E/F/G/I, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 145 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
histone H2B type 1-M, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 142 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone H2B type 1-M, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 142 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone H2B type 1-M, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 142 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone H2B type 1-M, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 142 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone H2B type 1-M, transcript variant X5
histone H2B type 1-M, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 142 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 144 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
H4 clustered histone 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
histone H2B type 1-M, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 182 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 182 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 182 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone H2B type 1-M, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 182 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 182 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 182 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 182 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 186 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H3 clustered histone 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001376928.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001363857.1
H2B clustered histone 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 163 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 185 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
H2A clustered histone 8, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 119 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: histone H2A type 1-H isoform X1
histone H3.1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001374526.1
The RefSeq transcript aligns at 90% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001361455.1
The RefSeq protein aligns at 99% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
H1.3 linker histone, cluster member, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H2A clustered histone 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001374525.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001361454.1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 540 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 173 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H3 clustered histone 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
H2B clustered histone 10, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 180 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H4 clustered histone 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001374580.1
transfer RNA methionine (anticodon CAU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon UCG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
uncharacterized LOC119867713, transcript variant X1
transfer RNA serine (anticodon GCU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA glutamine (anticodon UUG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA serine (anticodon UGA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA tryptophan (anticodon CCA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2 isoform X1
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2 isoform X2
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2 isoform X3
endogenous retrovirus group V member 2 Env polyprotein-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
endogenous retrovirus group V member 2 Env polyprotein-like isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(O) subunit gamma-5-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(O) subunit gamma-5-like isoform X1
transfer RNA leucine (anticodon CAG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA threonine (anticodon AGU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon ACG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA valine (anticodon CAC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 4, transcript variant X2
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 4, transcript variant X3
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 4, transcript variant X1
high mobility group nucleosome-binding domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
high mobility group nucleosome-binding domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 4, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 4, transcript variant X4
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 4, transcript variant X6
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 4, transcript variant X7
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 4, transcript variant X9
high mobility group nucleosome-binding domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
transfer RNA lysine (anticodon UUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA alanine (anticodon CGC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA isoleucine (anticodon AAU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA proline (anticodon AGG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA tyrosine (anticodon GUA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA alanine (anticodon AGC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA asparagine (anticodon GUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
zinc finger protein 322, transcript variant X4
zinc finger protein 322, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 322, transcript variant X1
zinc finger protein 322, transcript variant X6
zinc finger protein 322, transcript variant X2
zinc finger protein 322, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 322, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA valine (anticodon AAC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: proteasome subunit alpha type-6-like
transfer RNA isoleucine (anticodon UAU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 19% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
putative vomeronasal receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative vomeronasal receptor-like protein 4 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
transfer RNA proline (anticodon CGG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 182 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
histone H3-4-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 544 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H4 clustered histone 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 355 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 97 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transfer RNA histidin (anticodon GUG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transfer RNA valine (anticodon UAC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
uncharacterized LOC111094060, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transfer RNA serine (anticodon CGA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin like 2, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 10 bases in 7 codons; deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 10 bases in 7 codons; deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: POM121-like protein 2 isoform X2
zinc finger protein 391, transcript variant X16
zinc finger protein 391, transcript variant X14
zinc finger protein 391, transcript variant X6
zinc finger protein 391, transcript variant X7
zinc finger protein 391, transcript variant X8
zinc finger protein 391, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 391, transcript variant X9
zinc finger protein 184, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 184, transcript variant X1
zinc finger protein 184, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transfer RNA serine (anticodon AGA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA aspartic acid (anticodon GUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA glutamine (anticodon CUG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA leucine (anticodon CAA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA threonine (anticodon CGU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
uncharacterized LOC111094061, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094061, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867711, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867711, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867711, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867711, transcript variant X4
transfer RNA leucine (anticodon UAA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
uncharacterized LOC111094057, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094054, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094054, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094054, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094054, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094054, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094054, transcript variant X22
uncharacterized LOC111094054, transcript variant X20
uncharacterized LOC111094054, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111094054, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094054, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC111094054 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC111094054 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 100 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H2A clustered histone 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 184 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 494 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 187 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 99 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H4 clustered histone 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 354 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H4 clustered histone 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001374591.1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 172 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H2B clustered histone 15, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 85 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
H2B clustered histone 15, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 85 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
H2B clustered histone 15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 85 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
H2B clustered histone 15, transcript variant X4
H1.5 linker histone, cluster member, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 180 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H3 clustered histone 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
H4 clustered histone 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 156 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transfer RNA glycine (anticodon GCC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
cOR2B2P olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily B pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 Proteins
olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily W member 2, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily B member 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily B member 7
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00012
olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily B member 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 Proteins
zinc finger protein 165, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein 165 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein 501-like
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 16, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 16, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain-containing protein 16 isoform X1
zinc finger and SCAN domain-containing protein 16 isoform X2
zinc finger with KRAB and SCAN domains 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger with KRAB and SCAN domains 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein with KRAB and SCAN domains 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102154005, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102154005, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102154005, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger with KRAB and SCAN domains 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein with KRAB and SCAN domains 4
uncharacterized LOC119877884, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119877884, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 26, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain-containing protein 26 isoform X2
piggyBac transposable element derived 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
piggyBac transposable element-derived protein 1 isoform X4
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 31, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 31, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 31, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 31, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 31, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain-containing protein 31
zinc finger protein with KRAB and SCAN domains 4-like, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein with KRAB and SCAN domains 4-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger and SCAN domain-containing protein 12 isoform X1
olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily B member 28, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
transfer RNA threonine (anticodon UGU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
glutathione peroxidase 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001256320.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001243249.1
The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glutathione peroxidase 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001003213.1
The RefSeq transcript has 16 substitutions, 10 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001003213.1
The RefSeq protein has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
epididymal secretory glutathione peroxidase precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 44% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger BED-type containing 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
SCAN domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
transfer RNA alanine (anticodon UGC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA phenylalanine (anticodon GAA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon CCG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111094032, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111094032, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111094032, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC102156009 isoform X1
transfer RNA leucine (anticodon AAG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00156
uncharacterized LOC119867726, transcript variant X4
zinc finger protein 311, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 311, transcript variant X1
olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily AD member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily AD member 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001389036.1
GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily W member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily W member 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001389044.1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 59% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
olfactory receptor family 14 subfamily J member 1
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily C member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 10 subfamily C member 1
gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 1, transcript variant X6
gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 1 isoform X2
gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 1 isoform X1
gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 1 isoform X3
gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ZFP57 zinc finger protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ZFP57 zinc finger protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ZFP57 zinc finger protein, transcript variant X5
ZFP57 zinc finger protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ZFP57 zinc finger protein, transcript variant X2
zinc finger protein 57 homolog isoform X2
zinc finger protein 57 homolog isoform X1
putative uncharacterized protein ZNRD1-AS1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative uncharacterized protein ZNRD1-AS1, transcript variant X6
putative uncharacterized protein ZNRD1-AS1, transcript variant X2
putative uncharacterized protein ZNRD1-AS1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative uncharacterized protein ZNRD1-AS1, transcript variant X1
putative uncharacterized protein ZNRD1-AS1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative uncharacterized protein ZNRD1-AS1 isoform X2
putative uncharacterized protein ZNRD1-AS1 isoform X4
putative uncharacterized protein ZNRD1-AS1 isoform X1
putative uncharacterized protein ZNRD1-AS1 isoform X3
RNA polymerase I subunit H, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA-directed RNA polymerase I subunit RPA12 isoform X1
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory inhibitor subunit 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory inhibitor subunit 11, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase PPP1R11 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase PPP1R11 isoform X2
ring finger protein 39, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867736, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867736, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867736, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867736, transcript variant X3
tripartite motif-containing protein 10-like, transcript variant X3
tripartite motif-containing protein 10-like, transcript variant X2
tripartite motif-containing protein 10-like, transcript variant X4
tripartite motif-containing protein 10-like, transcript variant X1
tripartite motif-containing protein 10-like isoform X2
tripartite motif-containing protein 10-like isoform X1
tripartite motif-containing protein 26, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif-containing protein 26, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif-containing protein 26, transcript variant X2
tripartite motif-containing protein 26, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
olfactory receptor 2H1-like, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily H member 9, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: olfactory receptor 2H1-like isoform X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments