Canis lupus familiaris isolate Mischka breed German Shepherd chromosome 34, alternate assembly UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Laurasiatheria; Carnivora; Caniformia; Canidae; Canis.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM021995.1.\nAssembly name: UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Uppsala University on\n2020/03/10. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession JAAHUQ000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Uppsala University\nAssembly Date :: JUN-2019\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 0.5.0\nAssembly Name :: UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 100.0x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel; Hi-C\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Canis lupus familiaris Annotation\n Release 106\nAnnotation Version :: 106\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.5\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
cathepsin C pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
OTU deubiquitinase with linear linkage specificity, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
OTU deubiquitinase with linear linkage specificity, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
OTU deubiquitinase with linear linkage specificity, transcript variant X4
OTU deubiquitinase with linear linkage specificity, transcript variant X3
OTU deubiquitinase with linear linkage specificity, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin thioesterase otulin isoform X5
ubiquitin thioesterase otulin isoform X2
ubiquitin thioesterase otulin isoform X4
ubiquitin thioesterase otulin isoform X3
ubiquitin thioesterase otulin isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
OTU deubiquitinase with linear linkage specificity like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
OTU deubiquitinase with linear linkage specificity like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
OTU deubiquitinase with linear linkage specificity like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
inactive ubiquitin thioesterase OTULINL isoform X2
inactive ubiquitin thioesterase OTULINL isoform X3
inactive ubiquitin thioesterase OTULINL isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111093964, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093964, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X20
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X22
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X21
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X18
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100687594, transcript variant X4
trio Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: triple functional domain protein isoform X1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00015
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119867466, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093863, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119867416, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867416, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093928, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102154585, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102154585, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102154585, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
developmental pluripotency-associated protein 4-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
developmental pluripotency-associated protein 4-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102154851, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102154851, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102154851, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102154640, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
death associated protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
death associated protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
death associated protein, transcript variant X3
ankyrin repeat domain 33B, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 33B, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 33B, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 33B, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 33B isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102155183, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
rhophilin associated tail protein 1 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
rhophilin associated tail protein 1 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867469, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867469, transcript variant X3
membrane associated ring-CH-type finger 6, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane associated ring-CH-type finger 6, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane associated ring-CH-type finger 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane associated ring-CH-type finger 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane associated ring-CH-type finger 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MARCHF6 isoform X4
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MARCHF6 isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MARCHF6 isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MARCHF6 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MARCHF6 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
carboxymethylenebutenolidase homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
carboxymethylenebutenolidase homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
carboxymethylenebutenolidase homolog, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
carboxymethylenebutenolidase homolog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon CUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
carboxymethylenebutenolidase homolog isoform X1
carboxymethylenebutenolidase homolog isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase c subunit lysine N-methyltransferase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase c subunit lysine N-methyltransferase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase c subunit lysine N-methyltransferase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase c subunit lysine N-methyltransferase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase c subunit lysine N-methyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase subunit C lysine N-methyltransferase isoform X1
ATP synthase subunit C lysine N-methyltransferase isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC119867470, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093915, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleophosmin (nucleolar phosphoprotein B23, numatrin) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC111093931, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093931, transcript variant X3
taste 2 receptor member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01156
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: semaphorin-5A isoform X7
uncharacterized LOC111093959, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase reductase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase reductase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
FAST kinase domains 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
FAST kinase domains 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
FAST kinase domain-containing protein 3, mitochondrial isoform X1
FAST kinase domain-containing protein 3, mitochondrial isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC119867423, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867423, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867423, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenylate cyclase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119867471, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119867471, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867471, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867471, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119867471, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867471, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867424, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867424, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093963, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093963, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glucose-induced degradation protein 8 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: glucose-induced degradation protein 8 homolog
terminal nucleotidyltransferase 4A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
terminal nucleotidyltransferase 4A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
terminal nucleotidyltransferase 4A isoform X1
terminal nucleotidyltransferase 4A isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC111093872, transcript variant X2
steroid 5 alpha-reductase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001287100.1
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA cytosine C(5)-methyltransferase NSUN2 isoform X1
RNA cytosine C(5)-methyltransferase NSUN2 isoform X2
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 Q family like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2Q-like protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 10
uncharacterized LOC111093907, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093907, transcript variant X2
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00004
uncharacterized LOC119867472, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867472, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867428, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867428, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867428, transcript variant X1
interactor of little elongation complex ELL subunit 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
interactor of little elongation complex ELL subunit 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
little elongation complex subunit 1 isoform X2
little elongation complex subunit 1 isoform X1
interactor of little elongation complex ELL subunit 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
little elongation complex subunit 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 16 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC106558191, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119867430, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867430, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093865, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093865, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093865, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093865, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
iroquois-class homeodomain protein IRX-1
uncharacterized LOC111093922, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093922, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867475, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119867475, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867475, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867475, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867475, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867475, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
iroquois-class homeodomain protein IRX-2
uncharacterized LOC111093880, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093879, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC111093879, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093879, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC111093879, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111093879, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093879, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093879, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC111093879, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093879, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111093879, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC111093879, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC111093879, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized protein LOC111093879 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC111093879 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC100682563, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100682563, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC100682563, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC111093855, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093855, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111093855, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093855, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
iroquois homeobox 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
iroquois homeobox 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
iroquois-class homeodomain protein IRX-4 isoform X1
iroquois-class homeodomain protein IRX-4 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC119867476, transcript variant X2
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit S6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur protein 6, mitochondrial
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L36, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L36, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
39S ribosomal protein L36, mitochondrial isoform X1
39S ribosomal protein L36, mitochondrial isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC102152290, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102152290, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102152290, transcript variant X1
lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 isoform X3
lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 isoform X1
lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 isoform X2
solute carrier family 6 member 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001136500.1
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
cleft lip and palate transmembrane protein 1-like protein
telomerase reverse transcriptase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001031630.2
The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 1 frameshift compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001026800.2
The RefSeq protein has 4 substitutions, 1 frameshift compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: RNA-interacting domain 1. /evidence=ECO:0000250
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: GQ motif. /evidence=ECO:0000250
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: Required for regulating specificity for telomeric DNA and for processivity for primer elongation. /evidence=ECO:0000250
Required for optimal binding of telomeric ssDNA and incorporation of nucleotides at the second position of the template. /evidence=ECO:0000250; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); other site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: Disordered. /evidence=ECO:0000256|SAM:MobiDB-lite
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: Bipartite nuclear localization signal. /evidence=ECO:0000250
Phosphoserine, by PKB/AKT1. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:O14746; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); phosphorylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: Linker. /evidence=ECO:0000250
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: RNA-interacting domain 2. /evidence=ECO:0000250
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: TFLY, involved in RNA binding. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q4KTA7
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: QFP motif. /evidence=ECO:0000250
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: CP motif. /evidence=ECO:0000250
Phosphoserine, by DYRK2. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:O14746; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); phosphorylation site
Phosphotyrosine, by SRC-type Tyr-kinases. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:O14746; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); phosphorylation site
Required for nucleotide incorporation and primer extension rate. /evidence=ECO:0000250; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); other site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: Required for oligomerization. /evidence=ECO:0000250
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: Primer grip sequence. /evidence=ECO:0000250
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6A548.1); Region: CTE. /evidence=ECO:0000250
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
inactive sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT1
solute carrier family 12 member 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 12 member 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 12 member 7 isoform X1
solute carrier family 12 member 7 isoform X2
solute carrier family 12 member 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 12 member 7 isoform X3
solute carrier family 12 member 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 12 member 7 isoform X4
NKD inhibitor of WNT signaling pathway 2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein naked cuticle homolog 2
thyroid hormone receptor interactor 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001313869.1
The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
N-acetylmethionine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q15645; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (E2R222.1); acetylation site
bromodomain containing 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 9, transcript variant X3
bromodomain containing 9, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 9, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain-containing protein 9 isoform X2
bromodomain-containing protein 9 isoform X1
bromodomain-containing protein 9 isoform X3
bromodomain-containing protein 9 isoform X4
bromodomain-containing protein 9 isoform X5
palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC11, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC11, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC11, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC11, transcript variant X2
palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC11, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
tubulin polymerization promoting protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 72, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tubulin polymerization-promoting protein
centrosomal protein 72, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 72, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 72, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein of 72 kDa isoform X3
centrosomal protein of 72 kDa isoform X1
centrosomal protein of 72 kDa isoform X2
solute carrier family 9 member A3, transcript variant X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 isoform X3
exocyst complex component 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
exocyst complex component 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00012
aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor isoform X9
aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor isoform X10
aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor isoform X1
programmed cell death 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
programmed cell death 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
programmed cell death protein 6 isoform X2
programmed cell death protein 6 isoform X1
succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein subunit, mitochondrial isoform X2
succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein subunit, mitochondrial isoform X1
coiled-coil domain containing 127, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 127, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 127, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 127
leucine rich repeat containing 14B, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat containing 14B, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat containing 14B, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 14B isoform X2
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 14B isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC119867480, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867479, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867479, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867479, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867479, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized protein LOC119867479 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC119867479 isoform X2
pleckstrin homology and RhoGEF domain containing G4B, transcript variant X1
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family G member 4B isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC119867481, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867481, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867481, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867481, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867482, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867482, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119867482, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867437, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867437, transcript variant X1
double homeobox protein 4C-like, transcript variant X3
double homeobox protein 4C-like, transcript variant X2
double homeobox protein 4C-like, transcript variant X4
double homeobox protein 4C-like, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867484, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867484, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867484, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867484, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867484, transcript variant X5
microRNA mir-8790; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_128730.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119867438, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867438, transcript variant X1
zinc finger matrin-type 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger matrin-type 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger matrin-type 3, transcript variant X4
zinc finger matrin-type 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger matrin-type 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger matrin-type 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger matrin-type protein 3 isoform X2
zinc finger matrin-type protein 3 isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha isoform
potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily M regulatory beta subunit 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily M regulatory beta subunit 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily M regulatory beta subunit 3, transcript variant X2
calcium-activated potassium channel subunit beta-3 isoform X1
calcium-activated potassium channel subunit beta-3 isoform X2
zinc finger protein 639, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 639, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 639, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit beta-4
uncharacterized LOC119867489, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867489, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867489, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L47, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L47, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L47, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L47, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L47, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L47, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
39S ribosomal protein L47, mitochondrial isoform X3
39S ribosomal protein L47, mitochondrial isoform X2
39S ribosomal protein L47, mitochondrial isoform X1
39S ribosomal protein L47, mitochondrial isoform X4
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit B5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 108 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 5, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: 40S ribosomal protein S26-like
ubiquitin specific peptidase 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 13 isoform X1
ubiquitin specific peptidase 13, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 13 isoform X2
ubiquitin specific peptidase 13, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01241
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 13 isoform X3
ubiquitin specific peptidase 13, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 13 isoform X4
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X11
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X10
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X18
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X13
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X15
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X1
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 5 like, transcript variant X3
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 14, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 14, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 39
FMR1 autosomal homolog 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
FMR1 autosomal homolog 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
FMR1 autosomal homolog 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
FMR1 autosomal homolog 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
FMR1 autosomal homolog 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 isoform X1
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 isoform X2
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 isoform X3
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 isoform X4
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 isoform X5
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit TIM14
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized protein LOC119867493 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 28% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X28
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X27
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X30
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X33
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X35
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X29
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X34
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X31
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC119867493, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC106558228, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC106558228, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106558228, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC106558228, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106558228, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC106558228, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC106558228, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC106558228, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC106558228, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC106558228, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102153896, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102153896, transcript variant X2
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00139
uncharacterized LOC102153935, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102153935, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102153935, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102153985, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102153985, transcript variant X1
ATPase phospholipid transporting 11B (putative), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase phospholipid transporting 11B (putative), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase phospholipid transporting 11B (putative), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase phospholipid transporting 11B (putative), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IF isoform X4
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IF isoform X1
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IF isoform X2
ATPase phospholipid transporting 11B (putative), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IF isoform X3
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
defective in cullin neddylation 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
methylcrotonoyl-CoA carboxylase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
methylcrotonoyl-CoA carboxylase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
methylcrotonoyl-CoA carboxylase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
methylcrotonoyl-CoA carboxylase subunit alpha, mitochondrial isoform X1
methylcrotonoyl-CoA carboxylase subunit alpha, mitochondrial isoform X3
methylcrotonoyl-CoA carboxylase subunit alpha, mitochondrial isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 3
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like 2, transcript variant X3
probable guanine nucleotide exchange factor MCF2L2 isoform X11
probable guanine nucleotide exchange factor MCF2L2 isoform X12
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
probable guanine nucleotide exchange factor MCF2L2 isoform X10
uncharacterized LOC111093955, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093955, transcript variant X1
UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 5, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 5, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 5, transcript variant X7
UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 5, transcript variant X4
UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 5, transcript variant X9
UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 5, transcript variant X10
UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 5, transcript variant X6
UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
lactosylceramide 1,3-N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminyltransferase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00092
uncharacterized LOC111093848, transcript variant X1
kelch like family member 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 6, transcript variant X2
kelch like family member 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 6, transcript variant X4
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01210
kelch like family member 24, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 24, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 24, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 24, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 24, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 24, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 24, transcript variant X6
YEATS domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
YEATS domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
presenilin associated rhomboid like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
presenilin associated rhomboid like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
presenilins-associated rhomboid-like protein, mitochondrial isoform X1
presenilins-associated rhomboid-like protein, mitochondrial isoform X2
ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001128100.1
The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
multidrug resistance-associated protein 5
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 3C-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 37% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 3C-like isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 3E, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 35% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 3E, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 36% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 3E isoform X1
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 3E isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2B subunit epsilon
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
translation initiation factor eIF-2B subunit epsilon
dishevelled segment polarity protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
dishevelled segment polarity protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
segment polarity protein dishevelled homolog DVL-3 isoform X3
segment polarity protein dishevelled homolog DVL-3 isoform X1
adaptor related protein complex 2 subunit mu 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
adaptor related protein complex 2 subunit mu 1
ATP binding cassette subfamily F member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily F member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-binding cassette sub-family F member 3 isoform X1
ATP binding cassette subfamily F member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-binding cassette sub-family F member 3 isoform X2
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 5B2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 5B2, transcript variant X2
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 5B2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 5B2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 5B2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 5B2 isoform X1
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 5B2 isoform X2
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 5B2 isoform X5
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 5B2 isoform X3
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 5B2 isoform X4
ALG3 alpha-1,3- mannosyltransferase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ALG3 alpha-1,3- mannosyltransferase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
ALG3 alpha-1,3- mannosyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ALG3 alpha-1,3- mannosyltransferase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
dol-P-Man:Man(5)GlcNAc(2)-PP-Dol alpha-1,3-mannosyltransferase isoform X2
dol-P-Man:Man(5)GlcNAc(2)-PP-Dol alpha-1,3-mannosyltransferase isoform X4
dol-P-Man:Man(5)GlcNAc(2)-PP-Dol alpha-1,3-mannosyltransferase isoform X1
dol-P-Man:Man(5)GlcNAc(2)-PP-Dol alpha-1,3-mannosyltransferase isoform X3
endothelin converting enzyme 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
endothelin converting enzyme 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
endothelin-converting enzyme 2 isoform X8
EEF1A lysine methyltransferase 4 isoform X7
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II inhibitor 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II inhibitor 2
endothelin converting enzyme 2, transcript variant X2
endothelin converting enzyme 2, transcript variant X1
endothelin converting enzyme 2, transcript variant X4
endothelin converting enzyme 2, transcript variant X6
endothelin converting enzyme 2, transcript variant X3
endothelin converting enzyme 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
endothelin-converting enzyme 2 isoform X1
endothelin-converting enzyme 2 isoform X4
endothelin-converting enzyme 2 isoform X6
endothelin-converting enzyme 2 isoform X3
endothelin-converting enzyme 2 isoform X5
endothelin-converting enzyme 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X11
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X12
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 isoform X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 isoform X5
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 isoform X6
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 isoform X3
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 isoform X7
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 isoform X4
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 isoform X8
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 isoform X9
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 isoform X10
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 isoform X11
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00572
family with sequence similarity 131 member A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 131 member A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 131 member A, transcript variant X5
family with sequence similarity 131 member A, transcript variant X6
family with sequence similarity 131 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 131 member A, transcript variant X4
chloride voltage-gated channel 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride voltage-gated channel 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA-directed RNA polymerases I, II, and III subunit RPABC3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093864, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093864, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093864, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X10
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X8
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X7
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X22
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X4
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X5
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X18
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X11
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X9
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X24
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X6
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X20
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X2
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X16
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X19
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X3
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X17
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X14
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X15
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X12
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X13
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X21
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X23
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like, transcript variant X1
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like isoform X2
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like isoform X1
transmembrane epididymal protein 1A-like isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111093862, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093862, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093862, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093862, transcript variant X4
VPS8 subunit of CORVET complex, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
VPS8 subunit of CORVET complex, transcript variant X3
VPS8 subunit of CORVET complex, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 8 homolog isoform X1
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 8 homolog isoform X2
VPS8 subunit of CORVET complex, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 8 homolog isoform X5
VPS8 subunit of CORVET complex, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
VPS8 subunit of CORVET complex, transcript variant X5
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 8 homolog isoform X3
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 8 homolog isoform X4
VPS8 subunit of CORVET complex, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 8 homolog isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 33% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
enoyl-CoA hydratase and 3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X41
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X36
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X33
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X34
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X40
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X37
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X45
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X43
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X44
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X39
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X35
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X42
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X46
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC119863930, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 13, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 13
transmembrane protein 41A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 41A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106558207, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC106558207, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106558207, transcript variant X1
SUMO specific peptidase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
SUMO specific peptidase 2, transcript variant X1
SUMO specific peptidase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
SUMO specific peptidase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 isoform X3
insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 isoform X1
insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 isoform X5
insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 isoform X4
insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC111093887, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093887, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111093887, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093887, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transformer 2 beta homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transformer 2 beta homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transformer 2 beta homolog, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transformer 2 beta homolog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transformer 2 beta homolog, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
transformer-2 protein homolog beta isoform X2
transformer-2 protein homolog beta isoform X1
transformer-2 protein homolog beta isoform X3
ETS variant transcription factor 5, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ETS translocation variant 5
diacylglycerol kinase gamma, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
diacylglycerol kinase gamma, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
diacylglycerol kinase gamma, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
diacylglycerol kinase gamma, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
diacylglycerol kinase gamma, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
diacylglycerol kinase gamma, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin gamma S; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001080901.2
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (A2IBY7.1); Region: N-terminal arm
N-acetylserine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P22914; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (A2IBY7.1); acetylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (A2IBY7.1); Region: Connecting peptide
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member B11, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
dnaJ homolog subfamily B member 11 isoform X3
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member B11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
dnaJ homolog subfamily B member 11 isoform X2
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member B11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
dnaJ homolog subfamily B member 11 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 191 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 89 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 108 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 99 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 133 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01299
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00394
replication factor C subunit 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
replication factor C subunit 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
replication factor C subunit 4, transcript variant X2
replication factor C subunit 4 isoform X2
replication factor C subunit 4 isoform X1
adiponectin, C1Q and collagen domain containing; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
adiponectin, C1Q and collagen domain containing
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001006644.1
The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001006645.1
The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
COORDINATES: ab initio prediction:SignalP:4.0
ST6 beta-galactoside alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST6 beta-galactoside alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST6 beta-galactoside alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST6 beta-galactoside alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST6 beta-galactoside alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST6 beta-galactoside alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-galactoside alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 1 isoform X1
beta-galactoside alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 1 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC119867503, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867503, transcript variant X1
receptor transporter protein 1, transcript variant X2
receptor-transporting protein 1 isoform X2
receptor transporter protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-transporting protein 1 isoform X1
mannan binding lectin serine peptidase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannan-binding lectin serine protease 1 isoform X6
mannan binding lectin serine peptidase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mannan binding lectin serine peptidase 1, transcript variant X1
mannan-binding lectin serine protease 1 isoform X3
mannan-binding lectin serine protease 1 isoform X1
mannan binding lectin serine peptidase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannan binding lectin serine peptidase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannan binding lectin serine peptidase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannan-binding lectin serine protease 1 isoform X2
mannan-binding lectin serine protease 1 isoform X5
mannan-binding lectin serine protease 1 isoform X4
mannan binding lectin serine peptidase 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannan-binding lectin serine protease 1 isoform X7
uncharacterized LOC111093842, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093842, transcript variant X1
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X2
receptor-transporting protein 4 isoform X2
receptor-transporting protein 4 isoform X1
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X4
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X8
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X9
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X10
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X5
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X15
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X6
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X7
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X13
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X11
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X14
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X3
receptor transporter protein 4, transcript variant X12
somatostatin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001003307.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Alanine amide. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P01168; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P49670.1); amidation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P49670.1); Region: Disordered. /evidence=ECO:0000256|SAM:MobiDB-lite
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
BCL6 transcription repressor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867504, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867504, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867504, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867442, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867442, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 233 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119867505, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC119867505, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC119867505, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119867505, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC119867505, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC119867505, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119867505, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC119867505, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC119867505, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867505, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867505, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867505, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein LOC119867505 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC119867505 isoform X3
uncharacterized protein LOC119867505 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC119867505 isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC119867508, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867508, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867507, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867507, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867507, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156428, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156428, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102156428, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867509, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM domain containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM domain containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM domain containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma, transcript variant X15
LIM domain containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM domain containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma, transcript variant X5
LIM domain containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM domain containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM domain containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM domain containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM domain containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma, transcript variant X8
LIM domain containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma, transcript variant X9
microRNA mir-28; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tumor protein p63 regulated 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p63 regulated 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p63 regulated 1, transcript variant X3
tumor protein p63-regulated gene 1 protein isoform X1
tumor protein p63-regulated gene 1 protein isoform X2
tumor protein p63-regulated gene 1 protein isoform X3
tumor protein p63, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p63, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p63, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p63, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p63, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p63, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p63, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p63, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p63, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein, transcript variant X3
interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein, transcript variant X5
interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102151704, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151704, transcript variant X2
interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein isoform X1
interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein isoform X3
interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein isoform X2
geminin coiled-coil domain containing, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
geminin coiled-coil domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 50, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 50, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 50, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 50 isoform X1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 50 isoform X3
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 50 isoform X2
fibroblast growth factor 12, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor 12, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor 12, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106558216, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106558216, transcript variant X1
Mab-21 domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Mab-21 domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Mab-21 domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A and acyltransferase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A and acyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A and acyltransferase 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A and acyltransferase 1, transcript variant X6
phospholipase A and acyltransferase 1, transcript variant X4
phospholipase A and acyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A and acyltransferase 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A and acyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A and acyltransferase 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
probable cation-transporting ATPase 13A5 isoform X2
probable cation-transporting ATPase 13A5 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable cation-transporting ATPase 13A4 isoform X2
probable cation-transporting ATPase 13A4 isoform X1
probable cation-transporting ATPase 13A4 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable cation-transporting ATPase 13A4 isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC102153203, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102153203, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102153203, transcript variant X9
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
P2Y purinoceptor 3-like, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: P2Y purinoceptor 3-like isoform X1
IQCJ-SCHIP1 readthrough transcript protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
IQCJ-SCHIP1 readthrough transcript protein, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
IQCJ-SCHIP1 readthrough transcript protein isoform X1
IQCJ-SCHIP1 readthrough transcript protein isoform X12
IQCJ-SCHIP1 readthrough transcript protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
schwannomin-interacting protein 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
IQCJ-SCHIP1 readthrough transcript protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
IQCJ-SCHIP1 readthrough transcript protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
IQCJ-SCHIP1 readthrough transcript protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
schwannomin-interacting protein 1 isoform X3
IQCJ-SCHIP1 readthrough transcript protein, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
schwannomin-interacting protein 1 isoform X4
IQCJ-SCHIP1 readthrough transcript protein, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
schwannomin-interacting protein 1 isoform X13
uncharacterized LOC102153481, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102153481, transcript variant X2
IQCJ-SCHIP1 readthrough transcript protein, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
schwannomin-interacting protein 1 isoform X6
IQCJ-SCHIP1 readthrough transcript protein, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
schwannomin-interacting protein 1 isoform X5
uncharacterized LOC111093917, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093917, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
interleukin 12A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001003293.2
N-linked (GlcNAc...) asparagine. /evidence=ECO:0000255; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q28267.1); glycosylation site
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 1b allele 5-like, transcript variant X9
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 1b allele 5-like, transcript variant X7
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 1b allele 5-like, transcript variant X6
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 1b allele 5-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 1b allele 5-like, transcript variant X3
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 1b allele 5-like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 1b allele 5-like, transcript variant X5
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 1b allele 5-like, transcript variant X2
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 1b allele 5-like, transcript variant X1
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 1b allele 5-like isoform X9
uncharacterized protein LOC102153616 isoform X7
uncharacterized protein LOC102153616 isoform X6
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 1a-like isoform X8
uncharacterized protein LOC102153616 isoform X4
uncharacterized protein LOC102153616 isoform X3
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 1a-like isoform X5
uncharacterized protein LOC102153616 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC102153616 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102153795, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102153795, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102153795, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102153795, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized membrane protein C3orf80 homolog
intraflagellar transport 80, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 80, transcript variant X1
intraflagellar transport 80, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 80, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 80, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 80, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport protein 80 homolog isoform X1
intraflagellar transport protein 80 homolog isoform X2
intraflagellar transport protein 80 homolog isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
structural maintenance of chromosomes 4, transcript variant X1
structural maintenance of chromosomes 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 4 isoform X1
structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 4 isoform X2
microRNA mir-15b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA mir-16-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tripartite motif containing 59, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 59, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 59, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 59, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 59, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106558222, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867514, transcript variant X4
karyopherin subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
karyopherin subunit alpha 4, transcript variant X1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01295
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1L, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X5
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X22
UDP-GalNAc:beta-1, 3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093890, transcript variant X1
serine palmitoyltransferase small subunit B, transcript variant X5
serine palmitoyltransferase small subunit B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine palmitoyltransferase small subunit B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine palmitoyltransferase small subunit B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine palmitoyltransferase small subunit B, transcript variant X1
serine palmitoyltransferase small subunit B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like, transcript variant X3
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC111093938, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093938, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093938, transcript variant X3
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00003
uncharacterized LOC111093934, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867452, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867452, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867452, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC119867452, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC119867452, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC119867452, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119867452, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867452, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC119867452, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119867452, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867452, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC119867452, transcript variant X12
transcription elongation factor A protein-like 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like isoform X1
anaphase-promoting complex subunit 13-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC111093899, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093899, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093947, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093947, transcript variant X1
sucrase-isomaltase, transcript variant X1
sucrase-isomaltase, transcript variant X2
sucrase-isomaltase, intestinal isoform X1
sucrase-isomaltase, intestinal isoform X2
SLIT and NTRK like family member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT and NTRK like family member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT and NTRK like family member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111093826, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093824, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093826, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111093826, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093826, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093824, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867517, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867517, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093825, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111093825, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093825, transcript variant X2
butyrylcholinesterase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC102156697, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102156697, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102156697, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102156697, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC111093895, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093895, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156799, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156799, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102156799, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102156799, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093908, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093908, transcript variant X2
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X15
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger B-box domain-containing protein 1 isoform X6
zinc finger B-box domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
zinc finger B-box domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
zinc finger B-box domain-containing protein 1 isoform X7
zinc finger B-box domain-containing protein 1 isoform X8
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X9
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X8
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X7
zinc finger B-box domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X5
zinc finger B-box domain containing, transcript variant X4
zinc finger B-box domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
zinc finger B-box domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
serpin family I member 2, transcript variant X3
serpin family I member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin family I member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin family I member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin family I member 1, transcript variant X6
serpin family I member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin family I member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102151221, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151221, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102151275, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102151275, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151275, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized protein LOC102151275 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC102151275 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC102151275 isoform X3
golgi integral membrane protein 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
golgi integral membrane protein 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
golgi integral membrane protein 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
golgi integral membrane protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Golgi integral membrane protein 4 isoform X4
Golgi integral membrane protein 4 isoform X3
Golgi integral membrane protein 4 isoform X2
Golgi integral membrane protein 4 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111093926, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111093926, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102151672, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102151672, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102151672, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102151672, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102151672, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151672, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102151672, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102151672, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: 40S ribosomal protein S6-like
microRNA mir-551b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC119867522, transcript variant X1
multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein 10, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein LOC102151755 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC119867455, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102151967, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC102151967, transcript variant X17
uncharacterized LOC102151967, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC102151967, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC102151967, transcript variant X18
uncharacterized LOC102151967, transcript variant X20
uncharacterized LOC102151967, transcript variant X19
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MECOM isoform X3
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MECOM isoform X11
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MECOM isoform X5
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MECOM isoform X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MECOM isoform X10
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MECOM isoform X4
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MECOM isoform X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MECOM isoform X9
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MECOM isoform X7
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MECOM isoform X6
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase MECOM isoform X8
uncharacterized LOC106558208, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC106558208, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106558208, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC106558208, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC106558208, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA valine (anticodon AAC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat containing 34, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat containing 34, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat containing 34, transcript variant X4
leucine rich repeat containing 34, transcript variant X2
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 34 isoform X3
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 34 isoform X1
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 34 isoform X4
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 34 isoform X2
leucine rich repeats and IQ motif containing 4, transcript variant X7
leucine rich repeats and IQ motif containing 4, transcript variant X4
leucine rich repeats and IQ motif containing 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and IQ motif containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and IQ motif containing 4, transcript variant X2
leucine rich repeats and IQ motif containing 4, transcript variant X5
leucine rich repeats and IQ motif containing 4, transcript variant X6
leucine-rich repeat and IQ domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
leucine-rich repeat and IQ domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
leucine-rich repeat and IQ domain-containing protein 4 isoform X4
leucine-rich repeat and IQ domain-containing protein 4 isoform X5
leucine-rich repeat and IQ domain-containing protein 4 isoform X6
leucine-rich repeat and IQ domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
leucine rich repeat containing 31, transcript variant X4
leucine rich repeat containing 31, transcript variant X2
leucine rich repeat containing 31, transcript variant X3
leucine rich repeat containing 31, transcript variant X5
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 31 isoform X2
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 31 isoform X3
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 31 isoform X1
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 31 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 9% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
leucine rich repeat containing 31, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 17% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sterile alpha motif domain-containing protein 7
uncharacterized LOC119867527, transcript variant X1
SEC62 homolog, preprotein translocation factor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 44% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
G protein-coupled receptor 160, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 160, transcript variant X3
G protein-coupled receptor 160, transcript variant X6
polyhomeotic homolog 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
polyhomeotic homolog 3, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
polyhomeotic homolog 3, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
polyhomeotic homolog 3, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
polyhomeotic homolog 3, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
polyhomeotic homolog 3, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable G-protein coupled receptor 160 isoform X1
polyhomeotic homolog 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
polyhomeotic homolog 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093892, transcript variant X1
protein kinase C iota, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C iota, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C iota, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102153364, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102153364, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102153364, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102153364, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102153364, transcript variant X4
SKI like proto-oncogene, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI like proto-oncogene, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI like proto-oncogene, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI like proto-oncogene, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI like proto-oncogene, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI like proto-oncogene, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093838, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093838, transcript variant X2
probable cationic amino acid transporter
U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein B''-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111093888, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093888, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2, transcript variant X3
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2, transcript variant X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2 isoform X3
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2 isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2 isoform X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2 isoform X4
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00272
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X17
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X20
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X7
solute carrier family 2 member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 2 member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 2 member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 2 isoform X1
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 2 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC119867530, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized protein LOC119867530 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
TRAF2 and NCK interacting kinase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF2 and NCK interacting kinase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF2 and NCK interacting kinase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF2 and NCK interacting kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF2 and NCK interacting kinase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF2 and NCK interacting kinase, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF2 and NCK interacting kinase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF2 and NCK interacting kinase, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF2 and NCK-interacting protein kinase isoform X7
TRAF2 and NCK-interacting protein kinase isoform X6
TRAF2 and NCK-interacting protein kinase isoform X4
TRAF2 and NCK-interacting protein kinase isoform X5
TRAF2 and NCK-interacting protein kinase isoform X2
TRAF2 and NCK-interacting protein kinase isoform X3
TRAF2 and NCK-interacting protein kinase isoform X1
TRAF2 and NCK-interacting protein kinase isoform X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 212, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111093904, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093904, transcript variant X1
fibronectin type III domain containing 3B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibronectin type III domain-containing protein 3B
growth hormone secretagogue receptor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001099945.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
growth hormone secretagogue receptor type 1
TNF superfamily member 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001130836.1
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867533, transcript variant X1
epithelial cell transforming 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
epithelial cell transforming 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
epithelial cell transforming 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
epithelial cell transforming 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
epithelial cell transforming 2, transcript variant X4
epithelial cell transforming 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
epithelial cell transforming 2, transcript variant X5
epithelial cell transforming 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
epithelial cell transforming 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
spermatogenesis associated 16, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis associated 16, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis associated 16, transcript variant X1
spermatogenesis-associated protein 16 isoform X21
spermatogenesis-associated protein 16 isoform X20
spermatogenesis-associated protein 16 isoform X19
spermatogenesis associated 16, transcript variant X6
spermatogenesis associated 16, transcript variant X5
spermatogenesis associated 16, transcript variant X7
spermatogenesis associated 16, transcript variant X8
spermatogenesis-associated protein 16 isoform X23
spermatogenesis-associated protein 16 isoform X22
spermatogenesis-associated protein 16 isoform X25
spermatogenesis-associated protein 16 isoform X24
spermatogenesis associated 16, transcript variant X9
spermatogenesis-associated protein 16 isoform X5
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: T-complex protein 1 subunit eta
spermatogenesis associated 16, transcript variant X10
spermatogenesis-associated protein 16 isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093902, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093902, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155924, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155924, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867457, transcript variant X4
N-acetylated alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase like 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-acetylated alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase like 2, transcript variant X1
N-acetylated alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase like 2, transcript variant X2
inactive N-acetylated-alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase-like protein 2 isoform X1
inactive N-acetylated-alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase-like protein 2 isoform X2
N-acetylated alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase like 2, transcript variant X3
inactive N-acetylated-alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase-like protein 2 isoform X3
inactive N-acetylated-alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase-like protein 2 isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC111093911, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093911, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093911, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111093930, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093930, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
F-box-like/WD repeat-containing protein TBL1XR1 isoform X2
F-box-like/WD repeat-containing protein TBL1XR1 isoform X1
F-box-like/WD repeat-containing protein TBL1XR1 isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC111093849, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093849, transcript variant X1
translation initiation factor IF-2-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like
uncharacterized LOC111093850, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093850, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093878, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC111093878, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111093878, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093878, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093900, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111093900, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093900, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093900, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093857, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111093857, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093857, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867536, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119867536, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093843, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093844, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093844, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093844, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC111093844, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093844, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102157203, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102157203, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093866, transcript variant X1
potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily M regulatory beta subunit 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily M regulatory beta subunit 2, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102157308, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102157308, transcript variant X1
calcium-activated potassium channel subunit beta-2 isoform X1
calcium-activated potassium channel subunit beta-2 isoform X2