Canis lupus familiaris isolate Mischka breed German Shepherd chromosome 33, alternate assembly UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Laurasiatheria; Carnivora; Caniformia; Canidae; Canis.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM021994.1.\nAssembly name: UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Uppsala University on\n2020/03/10. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession JAAHUQ000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Uppsala University\nAssembly Date :: JUN-2019\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 0.5.0\nAssembly Name :: UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 100.0x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel; Hi-C\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Canis lupus familiaris Annotation\n Release 106\nAnnotation Version :: 106\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.5\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
chromosome 33 C3orf38 homolog, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: uncharacterized protein C3orf38 homolog isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 33 C3orf38 homolog, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C3orf38 homolog isoform X4
casein kinase 2 subunit alpha' interacting protein, transcript variant X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: casein kinase II subunit alpha'-interacting protein isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093760, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093760, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093792, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093792, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093755, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC111093755, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111093755, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093755, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093755, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093755, transcript variant X6
ephrin type-A receptor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
ephrin type-A receptor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102153984, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102153984, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102153984, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102153984, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093742, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC111093742, transcript variant X7
adrenocortical dysplasia protein homolog
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: adrenocortical dysplasia protein homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119867303, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102154029, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102154029, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102154029, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093735, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
vitamin K-dependent protein S isoform X1
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 13B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 13B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 13B isoform X1
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 13B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 13B isoform X3
ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 13B isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA (cytosine(34)-C(5))-methyltransferase, mitochondrial isoform X1
tRNA (cytosine(34)-C(5))-methyltransferase, mitochondrial isoform X2
NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase 3, transcript variant X3
tRNA (cytosine(34)-C(5))-methyltransferase, mitochondrial isoform X3
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 N-like, transcript variant X4
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 N-like
uncharacterized LOC111093819, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093819, transcript variant X2
translation initiation factor IF-2-like, transcript variant X2
translation initiation factor IF-2-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00493
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00494
uncharacterized LOC102154908, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102154908, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093744, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102154952, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102154952, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102154952, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102154952, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102154952, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102154952, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102155005, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102155005, transcript variant X1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
uncharacterized LOC111093770, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC111093769, transcript variant X1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00003
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111093780, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00004
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC119867305, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6, transcript variant X1
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6, transcript variant X7
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6, transcript variant X8
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 6 isoform X1
ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 6 isoform X3
ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 6 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin beta-gamma domain containing 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal oxygenase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal oxygenase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor rho3 subunit, transcript variant X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit rho-3 isoform X3
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily AC member 28, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily AC member 27; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily AC member 27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily AC member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily AC member 1
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily AC member 26, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily AC member 26, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily AC member 26, transcript variant X3
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily H member 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily H member 11
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388982.1
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001375911.1
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC102156426, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156426, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102156426, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102156426, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102156426, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156426, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102156426, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102156426, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102156426, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102156426, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102156426, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102156426, transcript variant X12
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily H member 13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 32 Proteins
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily H member 12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 Proteins
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily H member 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily H member 9
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388863.1
The RefSeq transcript has 14 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001375792.1
The RefSeq protein has 8 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00015
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily H member 16
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily K member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily K member 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388994.1
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily K member 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily K member 8
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388965.1
The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily K member 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily K member 6
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001389070.1
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily K member 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily K member 5
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily K member 18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily K member 18
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001388997.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001375926.1
uncharacterized LOC119867310, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867310, transcript variant X2
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily K member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor family 5 subfamily K member 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001389132.1
The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001376061.1
The RefSeq protein has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
G protein-coupled receptor 15, transcript variant X2
G protein-coupled receptor 15, transcript variant X4
G protein-coupled receptor 15, transcript variant X6
G protein-coupled receptor 15, transcript variant X5
G protein-coupled receptor 15, transcript variant X3
G protein-coupled receptor 15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
claudin domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
claudin domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
claudin domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
claudin domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
claudin domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
claudin domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
G protein-coupled receptor 15, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 15, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 15, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
oxygen-dependent coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase, mitochondrial
uncharacterized LOC102157336, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102157336, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102157336, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102157397, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102157397, transcript variant X1
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X12
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
type 2 lactosamine alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase isoform X1
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
type 2 lactosamine alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC111093720, transcript variant X1
discoidin, CUB and LCCL domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin, CUB and LCCL domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin, CUB and LCCL domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
discoidin, CUB and LCCL domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
discoidin, CUB and LCCL domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
discoidin, CUB and LCCL domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC106558158, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC106558158, transcript variant X20
uncharacterized LOC106558158, transcript variant X17
uncharacterized LOC106558158, transcript variant X21
uncharacterized LOC106558158, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC106558158, transcript variant X18
uncharacterized LOC106558158, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 40% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00401
cms1 ribosomal small subunit homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102151895, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102151895, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC102151895, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102151895, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102151895, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102151895, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151895, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102151895, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102151895, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102151895, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102151895, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cms1 ribosomal small subunit homolog, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
cms1 ribosomal small subunit homolog, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
cms1 ribosomal small subunit homolog, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C3orf26 homolog isoform X4
uncharacterized protein C3orf26 homolog isoform X5
filamin A interacting protein 1 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
filamin A interacting protein 1 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
filamin A interacting protein 1 like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
filamin A interacting protein 1 like, transcript variant X3
filamin A interacting protein 1 like, transcript variant X5
filamin A interacting protein 1 like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
filamin A interacting protein 1 like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
filamin A-interacting protein 1-like isoform X1
filamin A-interacting protein 1-like isoform X2
filamin A-interacting protein 1-like isoform X3
filamin A-interacting protein 1-like isoform X4
filamin A-interacting protein 1-like isoform X5
cms1 ribosomal small subunit homolog, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
cms1 ribosomal small subunit homolog, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
cms1 ribosomal small subunit homolog, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
cms1 ribosomal small subunit homolog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell cycle control protein 50C-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell cycle control protein 50C-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell cycle control protein 50C-like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell cycle control protein 50C-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell cycle control protein 50C-like, transcript variant X2
cell cycle control protein 50C-like, transcript variant X7
cell cycle control protein 50C-like, transcript variant X5
cell cycle control protein 50C-like isoform X1
cell cycle control protein 50C-like isoform X2
cell cycle control protein 50C-like isoform X4
cell cycle control protein 50C-like isoform X5
cell cycle control protein 50C-like isoform X11
cell cycle control protein 50C-like isoform X12
cell cycle control protein 50C-like isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC106558146, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC106558146, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106558146, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC106558146, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC106558146, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC106558146, transcript variant X9
TBC1 domain family member 23, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 23, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 23, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 23, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 70, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 70, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 70, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM70 isoform X2
mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM70 isoform X1
leukemia NUP98 fusion partner 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
leukemia NUP98 fusion partner 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
leukemia NUP98 fusion partner 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
leukemia NUP98 fusion partner 1, transcript variant X4
leukemia NUP98 fusion partner 1 isoform X2
leukemia NUP98 fusion partner 1 isoform X1
H/ACA ribonucleoprotein complex subunit DKC1-like, transcript variant X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: H/ACA ribonucleoprotein complex subunit DKC1-like isoform X4
transmembrane protein 45A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 45A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 45A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 45A, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 45A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 45A, transcript variant X1
transmembrane protein 45A, transcript variant X9
transmembrane protein 45A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 45A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor G7, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G-protein coupled receptor G7 isoform X6
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor G7, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor G7, transcript variant X10
adhesion G-protein coupled receptor G7 isoform X7
uncharacterized LOC119867315, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867315, transcript variant X2
trafficking from ER to golgi regulator, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 65 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking from ER to golgi regulator, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 65 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking from ER to golgi regulator, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking from ER to golgi regulator, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 65 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking from ER to golgi regulator, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 65 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X41
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X40
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X35
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X36
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X33
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X32
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X19
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X31
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X30
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X37
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X34
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X29
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X20
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X28
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X27
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X7
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X26
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X24
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X8
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X13
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X15
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X11
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X3
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X18
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X10
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X16
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X5
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X4
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X2
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X1
ABI family member 3 binding protein, transcript variant X39
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
interphotoreceptor matrix proteoglycan 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
interphotoreceptor matrix proteoglycan 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
interphotoreceptor matrix proteoglycan 2 isoform X1
interphotoreceptor matrix proteoglycan 2 isoform X2
SUMO specific peptidase 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001313826.1
The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001300755.1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins
putative protein FAM172B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tRNA methyltransferase 10C, mitochondrial RNase P subunit, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA methyltransferase 10C, mitochondrial RNase P subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA methyltransferase 10C, mitochondrial RNase P subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA methyltransferase 10C, mitochondrial RNase P subunit, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA methyltransferase 10C, mitochondrial RNase P subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA methyltransferase 10 homolog C isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111093812, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093812, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA methyltransferase 10 homolog C isoform X2
PEST proteolytic signal containing nuclear protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
PEST proteolytic signal-containing nuclear protein isoform X1
PEST proteolytic signal containing nuclear protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
PEST proteolytic signal-containing nuclear protein isoform X2
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 11 isoform X1
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 11 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 241 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 97, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 97, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 97, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 97, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 97, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102155536, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102155536, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155536, transcript variant X2
centrosomal protein of 97 kDa isoform X1
centrosomal protein of 97 kDa isoform X2
centrosomal protein of 97 kDa isoform X4
centrosomal protein 97, transcript variant X5
centrosomal protein 97, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein of 97 kDa isoform X3
neurexophilin and PC-esterase domain family member 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
NFKB inhibitor zeta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001284452.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001271381.1
The RefSeq protein has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC111093799, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093799, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093799, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093799, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC111093799, transcript variant X4
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00425
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X11
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X8
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X10
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X9
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zona pellucida like domain containing 1, transcript variant X15
zona pellucida-like domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
zona pellucida-like domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
zona pellucida-like domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC102155985, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102155985, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155985, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102155985, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102155985, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111093750, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093750, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC119867286, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119867286, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867286, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093724, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093782, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111093782, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093782, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093782, transcript variant X1
activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule
COORDINATES: ab initio prediction:SignalP:4.0
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CBL-B isoform X6
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CBL-B isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CBL-B isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CBL-B isoform X1
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CBL-B isoform X5
Cbl proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CBL-B isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC111093774, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC111093774, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC111093774, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC111093774, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC106558153, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156904, transcript variant X25
uncharacterized LOC102156904, transcript variant X26
uncharacterized LOC102156904, transcript variant X27
uncharacterized LOC102156904, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102156904, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102156904, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156904, transcript variant X31
uncharacterized LOC102156904, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156904, transcript variant X29
uncharacterized LOC102156904, transcript variant X28
uncharacterized LOC102156904, transcript variant X30
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA phenylalanine (anticodon GAA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 54
BBX high mobility group box domain containing, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
BBX high mobility group box domain containing, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
BBX high mobility group box domain containing, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
BBX high mobility group box domain containing, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
BBX high mobility group box domain containing, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
BBX high mobility group box domain containing, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
BBX high mobility group box domain containing, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
BBX high mobility group box domain containing, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
BBX high mobility group box domain containing, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
HMG box transcription factor BBX isoform X1
HMG box transcription factor BBX isoform X2
HMG box transcription factor BBX isoform X4
HMG box transcription factor BBX isoform X5
HMG box transcription factor BBX isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC102154483, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102154483, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093788, transcript variant X2
CD47 molecule; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
leukocyte surface antigen CD47 precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport protein 57 homolog
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; substituted 4 bases at 4 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: HERV-H LTR-associating protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cellular inhibitor of PP2A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
cellular inhibitor of PP2A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cellular inhibitor of PP2A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X12
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DZIP3 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DZIP3 isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DZIP3 isoform X4
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DZIP3 isoform X5
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DZIP3 isoform X6
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DZIP3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119867292, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119867292, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
T cell receptor associated transmembrane adaptor 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-cell receptor-associated transmembrane adapter 1
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 1, transcript variant X3
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
MORC family CW-type zinc finger protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC102155445, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102155445, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102155445, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102155445, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102155445, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
developmental pluripotency-associated protein 2
developmental pluripotency associated 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
developmental pluripotency-associated protein 4 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111093803, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093793, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093793, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093793, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111093722, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X17
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X18
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC102155742, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC111093801, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093801, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102155839, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102155839, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102155839, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102155839, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102155839, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102155839, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102155839, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102155839, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC102155839, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC102155839, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102155839, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102155839, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC119867326, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156008, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102156008, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102156008, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102156008, transcript variant X1
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X28
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X34
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X30
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X29
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X33
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X37
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X3
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X36
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X35
nectin cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X39
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00012
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-cell surface protein tactile isoform X1
T-cell surface protein tactile isoform X9
T-cell surface protein tactile isoform X10
T-cell surface protein tactile isoform X8
T-cell surface protein tactile isoform X11
T-cell surface protein tactile isoform X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger BED domain-containing protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
phosphatidylinositol specific phospholipase C X domain containing 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X12
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X3
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X2
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X5
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X6
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X9
pleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2 isoform X1
pleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2 isoform X4
pleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2 isoform X2
pleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2 isoform X5
pleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2 isoform X3
pleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2 isoform X6
pleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2 isoform X8
pleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2 isoform X12
pleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2 isoform X9
pleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2 isoform X10
pleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2 isoform X11
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology like domain family B member 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2 isoform X7
uncharacterized LOC111093728, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093728, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093728, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093728, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC111093728, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111093728, transcript variant X5
abhydrolase domain containing 10, depalmitoylase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
abhydrolase domain containing 10, depalmitoylase, transcript variant X2
abhydrolase domain containing 10, depalmitoylase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
palmitoyl-protein thioesterase ABHD10, mitochondrial isoform X2
palmitoyl-protein thioesterase ABHD10, mitochondrial isoform X1
palmitoyl-protein thioesterase ABHD10, mitochondrial isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
germinal center associated signaling and motility, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
germinal center associated signaling and motility, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
germinal center-associated signaling and motility protein isoform X2
germinal center-associated signaling and motility protein isoform X1
solute carrier family 9 member C1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 9 member C1, transcript variant X4
solute carrier family 9 member C1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 9 member C1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 9 member C1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C14orf119 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein C14orf119 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 12-like, transcript variant X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: myotubularin-related protein 12-like
B and T lymphocyte associated, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
B and T lymphocyte associated, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
B and T lymphocyte associated, transcript variant X1
B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator isoform X3
B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator isoform X2
B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator isoform X1
ubiquitin-like-conjugating enzyme ATG3 isoform X1
solute carrier family 35 member A5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member A5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member A5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member A5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member A5, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member A5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member A5, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable UDP-sugar transporter protein SLC35A5
solute carrier family 35 member A5, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 80, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 80 isoform X1
cell surface glycoprotein CD200 receptor 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
cell surface glycoprotein CD200 receptor 1, transcript variant X1
cell surface glycoprotein CD200 receptor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell surface glycoprotein CD200 receptor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell surface glycoprotein CD200 receptor 1 isoform X3
cell surface glycoprotein CD200 receptor 1 isoform X2
cell surface glycoprotein CD200 receptor 1 isoform X1
GTP binding protein 8 (putative), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTP binding protein 8 (putative), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTP binding protein 8 (putative), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTP binding protein 8 (putative), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTP binding protein 8 (putative), transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTP binding protein 8 (putative), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleolus and neural progenitor protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleolus and neural progenitor protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleolus and neural progenitor protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleolus and neural progenitor protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nucleolus and neural progenitor protein isoform X1
nucleolus and neural progenitor protein isoform X2
nucleolus and neural progenitor protein isoform X4
nucleolus and neural progenitor protein isoform X3
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102152218, transcript variant X4
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X1
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X6
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X11
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X5
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
BOC cell adhesion associated, oncogene regulated, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 44, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: cilia- and flagella-associated protein 44 isoform X1
spindle and centriole associated protein 1, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: spindle and centriole-associated protein 1 isoform X1
SID1 transmembrane family member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
SID1 transmembrane family member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
SID1 transmembrane family member 1 isoform X1
SID1 transmembrane family member 1 isoform X2
SID1 transmembrane family member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SID1 transmembrane family member 1 isoform X3
upstream transcription factor family member 3, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: basic helix-loop-helix domain-containing protein USF3 isoform X1
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 50, NatE catalytic subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 50, NatE catalytic subunit, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 50, NatE catalytic subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 50, NatE catalytic subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase H+ transporting V1 subunit A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase H+ transporting V1 subunit A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase H+ transporting V1 subunit A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase H+ transporting V1 subunit A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase H+ transporting V1 subunit A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit A
GRAM domain containing 1C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRAM domain containing 1C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRAM domain containing 1C, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00138
40S ribosomal protein S3a-like, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: 40S ribosomal protein S3a-like isoform X1
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 23, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 23, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 23, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 191, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 191, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 191, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 191, transcript variant X4
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 191 isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 191 isoform X1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 191 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase accessory subunit 2, transcript variant X2
queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase accessory subunit 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase accessory subunit 2, transcript variant X1
queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase accessory subunit 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase accessory subunit 2 isoform X1
queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase accessory subunit 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains, transcript variant X3
T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains, transcript variant X1
T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains, transcript variant X2
T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains isoform X1
T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains isoform X2
microRNA mir-568; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X30
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X11
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X6
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X10
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X29
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X1
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X7
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X3
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X5
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X12
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X15
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X13
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X16
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X18
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X17
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X19
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X20
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X21
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X23
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X25
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X22
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X26
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X28
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 20 isoform X1
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 20 isoform X3
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 20 isoform X2
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 20 isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC119867333, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119867333, transcript variant X2
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X33
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X34
uncharacterized LOC111093795, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093795, transcript variant X1
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20, transcript variant X35
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: 60S ribosomal protein L36-like
uncharacterized LOC111093767, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093767, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093766, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093766, transcript variant X1
growth associated protein 43, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
growth associated protein 43, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
limbic system associated membrane protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
limbic system associated membrane protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
limbic system associated membrane protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
limbic system associated membrane protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
limbic system-associated membrane protein isoform X5
limbic system-associated membrane protein isoform X3
limbic system-associated membrane protein isoform X2
limbic system-associated membrane protein isoform X1
limbic system associated membrane protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
limbic system-associated membrane protein isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111093806, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC100683406, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC100683406, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC100683406, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC100683406, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC100683406, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093712, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111093712, transcript variant X1
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11, transcript variant X5
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11 isoform X7
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11 isoform X6
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11 isoform X5
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11 isoform X8
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11 isoform X14
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11 isoform X13
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11 isoform X12
immunoglobulin superfamily member 11 isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC102155007, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102155007, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102155007, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155007, transcript variant X3
testis expressed 55, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
testis expressed 55, transcript variant X3
testis expressed 55, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
testis expressed 55, transcript variant X10
testis expressed 55, transcript variant X4
testis expressed 55, transcript variant X11
testis-specific expressed protein 55 isoform X2
testis-specific expressed protein 55 isoform X3
testis-specific expressed protein 55 isoform X9
testis-specific expressed protein 55 isoform X10
testis-specific expressed protein 55 isoform X4
testis-specific expressed protein 55 isoform X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001127498.1
The RefSeq transcript has 77 substitutions, 12 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 74% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001120970.1
The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01210
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 39A, transcript variant X3
transmembrane protein 39A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 39A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 39A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein O-glucosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein O-glucosyltransferase 1 isoform X1
translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
complex I assembly factor TIMMDC1, mitochondrial
CD80 molecule; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001003147.1
The RefSeq transcript has 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
T-lymphocyte activation antigen CD80 precursor
ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A1 member A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A1 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A1 member A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
popeye domain containing 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
popeye domain containing 2, transcript variant X7
popeye domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
popeye domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
cytochrome c oxidase copper chaperone COX17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytochrome c oxidase copper chaperone COX17
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001012736.1
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6J3Q7.3); Region: Disordered. /evidence=ECO:0000256|SAM:MobiDB-lite
Phosphoserine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q14061; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6J3Q7.3); phosphorylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6J3Q7.3); Region: Cx9C motif 1. /evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU01150
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6J3Q7.3); Region: Cx9C motif 2. /evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU01150
cilia and flagella associated protein 91, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 91, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 91, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 91, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 91, transcript variant X1
cilia and flagella associated protein 91, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 91 isoform X1
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 91 isoform X2
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 91 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC106558176, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106558176, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119877833, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119877833, transcript variant X1
glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta, transcript variant X10
glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta isoform X9
glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta isoform X8
glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta isoform X10
microRNA mir-6529; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 156, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 156, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 156, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 156, transcript variant X4
G protein-coupled receptor 156, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 156, transcript variant X5
probable G-protein coupled receptor 156 isoform X3
probable G-protein coupled receptor 156 isoform X1
probable G-protein coupled receptor 156 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 58
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit B4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 4
homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase isoform X2
homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC102151423, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC102151423, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC102151423, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102151423, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC102151423, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102151423, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC102151423, transcript variant X17
uncharacterized LOC102151423, transcript variant X16
general transcription factor IIE subunit 1, transcript variant X3
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family like 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family like 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family like 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family like 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIE subunit 1, transcript variant X7
general transcription factor IIE subunit 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIE subunit 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIE subunit 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIE subunit 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIE subunit 1, transcript variant X5
general transcription factor IIE subunit 1, transcript variant X6
general transcription factor IIE subunit 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIE subunit 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIE subunit 1 isoform X1
general transcription factor IIE subunit 1 isoform X2
syntaxin binding protein 5 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
syntaxin binding protein 5 like, transcript variant X5
syntaxin binding protein 5 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
syntaxin binding protein 5 like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
syntaxin binding protein 5 like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
syntaxin binding protein 5 like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
syntaxin-binding protein 5-like isoform X2
syntaxin-binding protein 5-like isoform X5
syntaxin-binding protein 5-like isoform X1
syntaxin-binding protein 5-like isoform X4
syntaxin-binding protein 5-like isoform X3
syntaxin-binding protein 5-like isoform X6
DNA polymerase theta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA polymerase theta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DNA polymerase theta, transcript variant X9
DNA polymerase theta, transcript variant X3
DNA polymerase theta, transcript variant X4
DNA polymerase theta, transcript variant X5
DNA polymerase theta, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
hematopoietic cell-specific Lyn substrate 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
hematopoietic lineage cell-specific protein isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093727, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093727, transcript variant X2
IQ motif containing B1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
IQ calmodulin-binding motif-containing protein 1
ELL associated factor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
ELL associated factor 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 15 member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 15 member 2 isoform X1
solute carrier family 15 member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 15 member 2 isoform X2
immunoglobulin like domain containing receptor 1, transcript variant X2
immunoglobulin like domain containing receptor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin like domain containing receptor 1, transcript variant X1
immunoglobulin-like domain-containing receptor 1 isoform X2
immunoglobulin-like domain-containing receptor 1 isoform X3
immunoglobulin-like domain-containing receptor 1 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111093739, transcript variant X1
CD86 molecule; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
T-lymphocyte activation antigen CD86 precursor
uncharacterized LOC102153132, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102153132, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102153132, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102153132, transcript variant X3
calcium sensing receptor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001081509.2
extracellular calcium-sensing receptor precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial matrix import factor 23, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 58 isoform X2
family with sequence similarity 162 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 5B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 5B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 5B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat-containing protein 5B isoform X1
karyopherin subunit alpha 1, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: importin subunit alpha-5
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 9, transcript variant X5
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 9, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 9, transcript variant X1
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 9, transcript variant X3
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 9, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP9 isoform X2
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP9 isoform X1
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP9 isoform X3
deltex E3 ubiquitin ligase 3L, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
deltex E3 ubiquitin ligase 3L, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX3L isoform X1
deltex E3 ubiquitin ligase 3L, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX3L isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX3L isoform X3
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 15, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP15 isoform X3
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 15, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 15, transcript variant X6
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 15, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP15 isoform X2
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 15, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP15 isoform X1
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 15, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 15, transcript variant X8
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP15 isoform X4
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 14, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 14, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 14, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 14, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP14 isoform X1
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP14 isoform X5
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP14 isoform X4
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP14 isoform X3
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 14, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP14 isoform X2
HSPB1 associated protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
HSPB1 associated protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
HSPB1 associated protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
HSPB1 associated protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein disulfide isomerase family A member 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC22 homolog A, vesicle trafficking protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC22 homolog A, vesicle trafficking protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC22 homolog A, vesicle trafficking protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC22 homolog A, vesicle trafficking protein, transcript variant X3
SEC22 homolog A, vesicle trafficking protein, transcript variant X2
vesicle-trafficking protein SEC22a isoform X2
vesicle-trafficking protein SEC22a isoform X1
vesicle-trafficking protein SEC22a isoform X3
adenylate cyclase 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001168460.1
The RefSeq transcript has 18 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 65% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC119867337, transcript variant X4
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001161932.1
The RefSeq protein has 3 substitutions and aligns at 62% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P30803.2); Region: Disordered. /evidence=ECO:0000256|SAM:MobiDB-lite
Omega-N-methylarginine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P84309; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P30803.2); methylation site
Phosphoserine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P84309; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P30803.2); phosphorylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P30803.2); transmembrane region
Phosphoserine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:O43306; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P30803.2); phosphorylation site
Phosphoserine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q03343; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (P30803.2); phosphorylation site
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: adenylate cyclase type 5-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
very-long-chain (3R)-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 2
myosin light chain kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin light chain kinase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin light chain kinase, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin light chain kinase, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin light chain kinase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin light chain kinase, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin light chain kinase, smooth muscle isoform X2
myosin light chain kinase, smooth muscle isoform X1
myosin light chain kinase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin light chain kinase, smooth muscle isoform X3
myosin light chain kinase, smooth muscle isoform X4
myosin light chain kinase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin light chain kinase, smooth muscle isoform X6
myosin light chain kinase, transcript variant X5
myosin light chain kinase, smooth muscle isoform X5
myosin light chain kinase, smooth muscle isoform X7
myosin light chain kinase, smooth muscle isoform X8
uncharacterized LOC119867342, transcript variant X1
coiled-coil domain containing 14, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 14, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 14 isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 14 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
kalirin RhoGEF kinase, transcript variant X56
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: kalirin isoform X56
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
mucin 13, cell surface associated, transcript variant X6
mucin 13, cell surface associated, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
heart development protein with EGF like domains 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 148, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 148, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 148, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
basic salivary proline-rich protein 3-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
basic salivary proline-rich protein 3-like isoform X2
collagen alpha-1(I) chain-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein LOC119867271 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
oxysterol binding protein like 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
oxysterol binding protein like 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
oxysterol-binding protein-related protein 11
uncharacterized LOC111093708, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111093708, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093708, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein LOC111093708 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC111093708 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC111093708, transcript variant X21
uncharacterized LOC111093708, transcript variant X19
uncharacterized LOC111093708, transcript variant X17
uncharacterized LOC111093708, transcript variant X18
uncharacterized LOC111093708, transcript variant X20
uncharacterized LOC119867349, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119867349, transcript variant X6
leishmanolysin like peptidase, transcript variant X3
leishmanolysin-like peptidase isoform X3
leishmanolysin like peptidase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
leishmanolysin-like peptidase isoform X1
leishmanolysin like peptidase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
leishmanolysin-like peptidase isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00282
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 120 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
IQ motif containing G, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
IQ motif containing G, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
IQ motif containing G, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
IQ motif containing G, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
IQ motif containing G, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
dynein regulatory complex protein 9 isoform X1
dynein regulatory complex protein 9 isoform X2
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 3, transcript variant X40
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 3, transcript variant X39
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 3, transcript variant X35
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 3, transcript variant X33
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 3, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 3, transcript variant X38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 3, transcript variant X34
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 3, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 3, transcript variant X30
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 3, transcript variant X37
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 3, transcript variant X36
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
forty-two-three domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X2
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X1
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X7
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X8
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X12
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X3
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X9
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X1
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X7
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X2
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X8
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X10
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X5
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X6
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X12
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X3
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X4
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X9
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X13
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X11
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X15
rubicon autophagy regulator, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein isoform X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
mucin 20, cell surface associated, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
mucin 20, cell surface associated, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
mucin 4, cell surface associated, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
mucin 4, cell surface associated, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111093734, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111093734, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X7
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X15
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X17
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine kinase non receptor 2, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transferrin receptor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001003111.1
The RefSeq transcript has 9 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001003111.1
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); Region: Mediates interaction with SH3BP4. /evidence=ECO:0000250
Phosphoserine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P02786; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); phosphorylation site
Phosphoserine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q62351; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); phosphorylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); Region: Endocytosis signal
Phosphotyrosine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P02786; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); phosphorylation site
Phosphothreonine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P02786; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); phosphorylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); Region: Stop-transfer sequence
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); transmembrane region
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); Region: Disordered. /evidence=ECO:0000256|SAM:MobiDB-lite
O-linked (GalNAc...) threonine. /evidence=ECO:0000250; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); glycosylation site
N-linked (GlcNAc...) asparagine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P02786; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); glycosylation site
N-linked (GlcNAc...) asparagine. /evidence=ECO:0000250; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); glycosylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); Region: Ligand-binding. /evidence=ECO:0000250
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); Region: Cell attachment site. /evidence=ECO:0000255
N-linked (GlcNAc...) asparagine. /evidence=ECO:0000255; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GLD3.1); glycosylation site
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 19, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 51 subunit alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 51 subunit alpha, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 51 subunit alpha, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 51 subunit alpha, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 51 subunit alpha, transcript variant X8
solute carrier family 51 subunit alpha, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 51 subunit alpha, transcript variant X6
solute carrier family 51 subunit alpha, transcript variant X4
organic solute transporter subunit alpha isoform X1
organic solute transporter subunit alpha isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
organic solute transporter subunit alpha isoform X2
phosphate cytidylyltransferase 1, choline, alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphate cytidylyltransferase 1, choline, alpha, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphate cytidylyltransferase 1, choline, alpha, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
choline-phosphate cytidylyltransferase A
uncharacterized LOC119867351, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
dynein light chain Tctex-type protein 2B
transmembrane 4 L6 family member 19-like, transcript variant X2
transmembrane 4 L6 family member 19-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane 4 L6 family member 19-like
UBX domain protein 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain-containing protein 7 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
single-pass membrane protein with coiled-coil domains 1, transcript variant X3
single-pass membrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 1
WD repeat domain 53, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 53, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 53, transcript variant X7
WD repeat domain 53, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 53, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 53, transcript variant X13
WD repeat domain 53, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 53, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat-containing protein 53 isoform X1
WD repeat-containing protein 53 isoform X2
WD repeat-containing protein 53 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111093699, transcript variant X1
microRNA mir-8789; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
negative regulator of reactive oxygen species, transcript variant X3
transforming growth factor beta activator LRRC33 isoform X2
negative regulator of reactive oxygen species, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
negative regulator of reactive oxygen species, transcript variant X2
transforming growth factor beta activator LRRC33 isoform X1
centrosomal protein 19, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 19, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 19, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 19, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class X, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphatidylinositol-glycan biosynthesis class X protein isoform X2
p21 (RAC1) activated kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
p21 (RAC1) activated kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 2 isoform X1
p21 (RAC1) activated kinase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 2 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC111093719, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111093719, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC111093719, transcript variant X5
SUMO specific peptidase 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
SUMO specific peptidase 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
SUMO specific peptidase 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
SUMO specific peptidase 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
SUMO specific peptidase 5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
SUMO specific peptidase 5, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
SUMO specific peptidase 5, transcript variant X6
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2, transcript variant X3
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2, transcript variant X7
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2 isoform X1
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2 isoform X4
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2 isoform X2
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class Z, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class Z, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class Z, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class Z, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class Z, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class Z, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class Z, transcript variant X5
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class Z, transcript variant X7
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class Z, transcript variant X10
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class Z, transcript variant X8
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class Z, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
melanotransferrin, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X9
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X7
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X5
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X1
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X2
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X3
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X19
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X18
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 1, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1, transcript variant X2
D-beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial isoform X14
D-beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial isoform X15
D-beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial isoform X1
D-beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial isoform X3
D-beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial isoform X2
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1, transcript variant X22
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1, transcript variant X21
D-beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial isoform X17
D-beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial isoform X16
collagen alpha-1(I) chain-like, transcript variant X3
basic proline-rich protein-like isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X21
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X17
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 83 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X19
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X18
uncharacterized LOC106558182, transcript variant X20
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory inhibitor subunit 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory inhibitor subunit 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001113168.2
ArfGAP with coiled-coil, ankyrin repeat and PH domains 2, transcript variant X4
ArfGAP with coiled-coil, ankyrin repeat and PH domains 2, transcript variant X3
ArfGAP with coiled-coil, ankyrin repeat and PH domains 2, transcript variant X1
ArfGAP with coiled-coil, ankyrin repeat and PH domains 2, transcript variant X2
ArfGAP with coiled-coil, ankyrin repeat and PH domains 2, transcript variant X5
ArfGAP with coiled-coil, ankyrin repeat and PH domains 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
arf-GAP with coiled-coil, ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
arf-GAP with coiled-coil, ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
arf-GAP with coiled-coil, ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
arf-GAP with coiled-coil, ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X5
arf-GAP with coiled-coil, ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X7
arf-GAP with coiled-coil, ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
ArfGAP with coiled-coil, ankyrin repeat and PH domains 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
arf-GAP with coiled-coil, ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
family with sequence similarity 43 member A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
large 60S subunit nuclear export GTPase 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP4-like, transcript variant X4
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP4-like, transcript variant X2
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP4-like, transcript variant X3
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP4-like, transcript variant X1
protein mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP4-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable cation-transporting ATPase 13A3 isoform X1
probable cation-transporting ATPase 13A3 isoform X2
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
carboxypeptidase N subunit 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns