Canis lupus familiaris isolate Mischka breed German Shepherd chromosome 19, alternate assembly UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Laurasiatheria; Carnivora; Caniformia; Canidae; Canis.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM021980.1.\nAssembly name: UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Uppsala University on\n2020/03/10. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession JAAHUQ000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Uppsala University\nAssembly Date :: JUN-2019\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 0.5.0\nAssembly Name :: UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 100.0x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel; Hi-C\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Canis lupus familiaris Annotation\n Release 106\nAnnotation Version :: 106\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.5\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X5
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X4
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X2
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X3
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X1
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X5
uncharacterized LOC102153761, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102153761, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 38, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 38, transcript variant X6
ubiquitin specific peptidase 38, transcript variant X4
ubiquitin specific peptidase 38, transcript variant X5
ubiquitin specific peptidase 38, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 38, transcript variant X1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X2
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X10
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X1
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X4
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X3
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X6
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X5
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X8
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00015
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
interleukin 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001197188.1
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001184117.1
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC111091040, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111091040, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 330, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 330, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 330, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 330, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119864426, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864426, transcript variant X1
ring finger protein 150, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 150, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111091086, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091086, transcript variant X1
TBC1 domain family member 9, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 9, transcript variant X3
TBC1 domain family member 9, transcript variant X4
TBC1 domain family member 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 9, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncoupling protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001003046.1
The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001003046.1
The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial brown fat uncoupling protein 1
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GMZ1.1); Region: Solcar 1
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GMZ1.1); transmembrane region
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GMZ1.1); Region: Solcar 2
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9GMZ1.1); Region: Solcar 3
ELMO domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ELMO domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
MGAT4 family member D, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
MGAT4 family member D, transcript variant X1
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like protein MGAT4D isoform X1
MGAT4 family member D, transcript variant X3
MGAT4 family member D, transcript variant X4
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like protein MGAT4D isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC119864430, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119864430, transcript variant X2
calmegin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
COORDINATES: ab initio prediction:SignalP:4.0
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
mastermind like transcriptional coactivator 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111091089, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091089, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119864429, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119864429, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111091087, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091087, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111091087, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111091088, transcript variant X2
microsomal glutathione S-transferase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
microsomal glutathione S-transferase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
microsomal glutathione S-transferase 2 isoform X1
microsomal glutathione S-transferase 2 isoform X2
SET domain containing 7, histone lysine methyltransferase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETD7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X2
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X1
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X3
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102155242, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102155242, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit C1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 subunit C1, mitochondrial
mitochondria localized glutamic acid rich protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondria localized glutamic acid rich protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X1
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X6
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X8
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X7
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X11
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X1
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X4
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X3
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X7
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X2
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X6
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X5
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X8
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X13
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X15
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X10
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X12
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X11
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X14
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X16
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X13
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X9
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X15
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC111091096, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091096, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091096, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 7 member 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001301862.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC111091046, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091046, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 54% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC119864435, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119864435, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 14% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119864373, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091101, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091101, transcript variant X1
developmental pluripotency-associated protein 4-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
developmental pluripotency-associated protein 4-like
uncharacterized LOC119864374, transcript variant X3
poly(A) binding protein cytoplasmic 4 like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA valine (anticodon UAC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106560045, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC106560045, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106560045, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC106560045, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111091102, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111091102, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 Proteins, and 59% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119864376, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119864376, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119868841, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111091103, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 243 Proteins, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102157141, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102157193, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102157193, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102157193, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119864377, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091104, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091104, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC111091104, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091104, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111091104, transcript variant X3
chromosome 19 C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X2
chromosome 19 C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 19 C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 19 C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 19 C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 19 C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
UPF0462 protein C4orf33 homolog isoform X2
UPF0462 protein C4orf33 homolog isoform X1
UPF0462 protein C4orf33 homolog isoform X3
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1, transcript variant X4
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1 isoform X1
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1 isoform X4
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1 isoform X3
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1 isoform X2
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X13
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATX1 antioxidant protein 1 homolog (yeast) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X7
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X6
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X16
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X10
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X8
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X11
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X1
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
importin subunit alpha-8-like isoform X1
importin subunit alpha-8-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 40% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X15
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X5
importin subunit alpha-8-like, transcript variant X9
progesterone receptor membrane component 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane-associated progesterone receptor component 2
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X12
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X9
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X11
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X16
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 8, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 8, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 8, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 8, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 8, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 8 isoform X4
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 8 isoform X1
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 8 isoform X6
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 8 isoform X2
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 8 isoform X3
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 8 isoform X5
polo like kinase 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
polo like kinase 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase PLK4 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase PLK4 isoform X2
heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 4 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 4 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
inturned planar cell polarity protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
inturned planar cell polarity protein, transcript variant X2
inturned planar cell polarity protein, transcript variant X3
inturned planar cell polarity protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC111091111, transcript variant X1
microRNA mir-8857; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00004
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC111091109, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091109, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091109, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
N-acylneuraminate-9-phosphatase-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
N-acylneuraminate-9-phosphatase-like isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC111091112, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091112, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111091112, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091112, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102153490, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102153490, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102153490, transcript variant X3
transfer RNA glycine (anticodon UCC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 50
uncharacterized LOC111091114, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091114, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091114, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091115, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091115, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119864382, transcript variant X1
cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein COX20, mitochondrial-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein COX20, mitochondrial-like
sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 1, transcript variant X2
spermatogenesis associated 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis associated 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis associated 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase family protein 2 homolog isoform X2
ATPase family protein 2 homolog isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
spermatogenesis associated 5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase family protein 2 homolog isoform X4
spermatogenesis associated 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase family protein 2 homolog isoform X3
spermatogenesis associated 5, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase family protein 2 homolog isoform X6
uncharacterized LOC119877275, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119877275, transcript variant X1
spermatogenesis associated 5, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase family protein 2 homolog isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nudix hydrolase 6, transcript variant X1
nudix hydrolase 6, transcript variant X2
nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X motif 6 isoform X2
fibroblast growth factor 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nudix hydrolase 6, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X motif 6 isoform X1
nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X motif 6 isoform X3
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12, transcript variant X13
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12, transcript variant X18
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 21; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001003347.1
The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q6L7I9.1); Region: Disordered. /evidence=ECO:0000256|SAM:MobiDB-lite
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 17% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111091120, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091120, transcript variant X1
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X9
adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X10
adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X8
adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X6
adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X7
interleukin 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
O-linked (GalNAc...) threonine. /evidence=ECO:0000250; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q29416.1); glycosylation site
N-linked (GlcNAc...) asparagine. /evidence=ECO:0000255; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q29416.1); glycosylation site
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein KIAA1109 homolog isoform X4
transmembrane protein KIAA1109 homolog isoform X1
transmembrane protein KIAA1109 homolog isoform X2
transmembrane protein KIAA1109 homolog isoform X3
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X2
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X1
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X2
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X3
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X4
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X5
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X6
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X7
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 7 protein isoform X1
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 7 protein isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC111091122, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091122, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
small integral membrane protein 43; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001384275.1
The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC119864443, transcript variant X2
annexin A5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
pyroglutamylated RFamide peptide receptor, transcript variant X4
pyroglutamylated RFamide peptide receptor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
pyroglutamylated RF-amide peptide receptor isoform X4
pyroglutamylated RF-amide peptide receptor isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC102156162, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102156162, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156162, transcript variant X1
TNFAIP3 interacting protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNFAIP3 interacting protein 3, transcript variant X2
TNFAIP3-interacting protein 3 isoform X1
TNFAIP3-interacting protein 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
PR domain zinc finger protein 5 isoform X1
PR domain zinc finger protein 5 isoform X3
PR domain zinc finger protein 5 isoform X5
PR domain zinc finger protein 5 isoform X7
PR domain zinc finger protein 5 isoform X4
PR domain zinc finger protein 5 isoform X2
PR domain zinc finger protein 5 isoform X6
uncharacterized LOC119864444, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 39% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
non-histone chromosomal protein HMG-17-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 31% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X43
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X41
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X33
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X31
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X39
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X36
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X30
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X37
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X29
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X42
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X28
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X35
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X34
uncharacterized protein LOC119864445 isoform X11
uncharacterized protein LOC119864445 isoform X15
uncharacterized protein LOC119864445 isoform X14
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X40
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC119864445 isoform X12
uncharacterized protein LOC119864445 isoform X13
uncharacterized LOC119864456, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119864456, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC119864456, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC119864456, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119864449, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864449, transcript variant X3
NK1 transcription factor-related protein 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119877276, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119877276, transcript variant X1
rho GTPase-activating protein 20-like, transcript variant X3
mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD2A-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein LOC119864422 isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC111091126, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC111091126, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156811, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102156811, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102156811, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102156811, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102156811, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156811, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156811, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102156811, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102156811, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC102156811, transcript variant X9
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 4 bases at 4 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: probable G-protein coupled receptor 148
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119864465, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864465, transcript variant X1
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 4 isoform X1
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 4 isoform X2
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 4 isoform X3
family with sequence similarity 168 member B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 168 member B, transcript variant X1
myelin-associated neurite-outgrowth inhibitor
pleckstrin homology domain containing B2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing B2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family B member 2 isoform X1
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family B member 2 isoform X2
signal recognition particle 19 kDa protein-like
uncharacterized LOC111091129, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091129, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091129, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 Proteins
glutamate dehydrogenase 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 38 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111091051, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091051, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091052, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091052, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151686, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102151686, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102151686, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102151686, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102151686, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151686, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC100683549, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC100683549, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucose glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucose glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 1 isoform X2
UDP-glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 1 isoform X1
UDP-glucose glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119864466, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC119864466, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119864466, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864466, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119864466, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119864466, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119864466, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein LOC119864466 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC119864466 isoform X1
Sin3A associated protein 130, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sin3A associated protein 130, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sin3A associated protein 130, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sin3A associated protein 130, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sin3A associated protein 130, transcript variant X7
Sin3A associated protein 130, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sin3A associated protein 130, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP130 isoform X1
histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP130 isoform X2
histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP130 isoform X4
histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP130 isoform X6
histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP130 isoform X5
histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP130 isoform X7
histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP130 isoform X3
small nucleolar RNA SNORA62/SNORA6 family
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00091
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA polymerase II subunit D, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA polymerase II subunit D, transcript variant X1
DNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit RPB4
WD repeat domain 33, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 33, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 33, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 33, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 33, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 33, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 33, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 33, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 27% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pre-mRNA 3' end processing protein WDR33 isoform X1
pre-mRNA 3' end processing protein WDR33 isoform X2
pre-mRNA 3' end processing protein WDR33 isoform X3
pre-mRNA 3' end processing protein WDR33 isoform X4
pre-mRNA 3' end processing protein WDR33 isoform X7
pre-mRNA 3' end processing protein WDR33 isoform X6
pre-mRNA 3' end processing protein WDR33 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 26% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LIM zinc finger domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM zinc finger domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM and senescent cell antigen-like-containing domain protein 2 isoform X3
LIM zinc finger domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM zinc finger domain containing 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM zinc finger domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM and senescent cell antigen-like-containing domain protein 2 isoform X1
LIM and senescent cell antigen-like-containing domain protein 2 isoform X4
LIM zinc finger domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM and senescent cell antigen-like-containing domain protein 2 isoform X2
G protein-coupled receptor 17, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 17, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 17, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 17, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 17, transcript variant X8
G protein-coupled receptor 17, transcript variant X7
G protein-coupled receptor 17, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 17, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 17, transcript variant X4
G protein-coupled receptor 17, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
uracil nucleotide/cysteinyl leukotriene receptor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102153237, transcript variant X1
interacts with SUPT6H, CTD assembly factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
interacts with SUPT6H, CTD assembly factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
interacts with SUPT6H, CTD assembly factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
interacts with SUPT6H, CTD assembly factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins
protein C, inactivator of coagulation factors Va and VIIIa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein C, inactivator of coagulation factors Va and VIIIa
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001013849.1
vitamin K-dependent protein C proprotein
4-carboxyglutamate. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P00745, ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU00463; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q28278.2); gamma-carboxyglutamic-acid site
(3R)-3-hydroxyaspartate. /evidence=ECO:0000250; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q28278.2); hydroxylation site
N-linked (GlcNAc...) asparagine. /evidence=ECO:0000255; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q28278.2); glycosylation site
uncharacterized LOC102153535, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102153535, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102153535, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102153535, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 2 isoform X1
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 2 isoform X2
ERCC excision repair 3, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
ERCC excision repair 3, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
ERCC excision repair 3, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit, transcript variant X3
ERCC excision repair 3, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ERCC excision repair 3, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription and DNA repair factor IIH helicase subunit XPB
cytochrome P450 family 27 subfamily C member 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytochrome P450 family 27 subfamily C member 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytochrome P450 family 27 subfamily C member 1, transcript variant X1
cytochrome P450 family 27 subfamily C member 1, transcript variant X4
cytochrome P450 family 27 subfamily C member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytochrome P450 family 27 subfamily C member 1, transcript variant X5
cytochrome P450 family 27 subfamily C member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X17
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X19
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X22
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X1
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X8
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X7
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X11
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X9
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X12
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X17
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X13
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X19
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X23
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X3
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X15
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X16
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X22
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X6
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X18
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X24
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X26
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X10
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X14
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X20
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X21
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X25
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X27
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X28
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X4
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X5
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X28
bridging integrator 1, transcript variant X2
myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 isoform X2
testis expressed 51, transcript variant X3
testis expressed 51, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
testis expressed 51, transcript variant X1
testis expressed 51, transcript variant X6
testis expressed 51, transcript variant X7
testis expressed 51, transcript variant X8
testis expressed 51, transcript variant X5
testis expressed 51, transcript variant X4
testis expressed 51, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycophorin C (Gerbich blood group); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001104959.1
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 Proteins, and 46% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 35% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
contactin associated protein family member 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
contactin associated protein family member 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001048108.1
contactin-associated protein-like 5 precursor
N-linked (GlcNAc...) asparagine. /evidence=ECO:0000255; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q0V8T0.1); glycosylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q0V8T0.1); transmembrane region
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 252 Proteins, and 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102155172, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102155172, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102155172, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102155172, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155172, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102155172, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102155172, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102155172, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102155172, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102155172, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102155172, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102155172, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091136, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091136, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 9% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 6% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111091138, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111091138, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111091138, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC111091138, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC111091138, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC111091138, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC111091138, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111091138, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091138, transcript variant X2
40S ribosomal protein S27-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins
40S ribosomal protein S27-like isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC102155343, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102155343, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleolar protein interacting with the FHA domain of MKI67
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
MKI67 FHA domain-interacting nucleolar phosphoprotein isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106560033, transcript variant X1
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X6
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X17
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X11
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X16
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoplasmic linker associated protein 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00618
transcription factor CP2 like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor CP2 like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor CP2-like protein 1 isoform X1
transcription factor CP2-like protein 1 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC102156163, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
GLI family zinc finger 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
GLI family zinc finger 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
GLI family zinc finger 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102156205, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102156322, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156322, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091146, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091146, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091145, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091145, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119864473, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091147, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091147, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091149, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAS like proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAS like proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAS like proto-oncogene B, transcript variant X2
transmembrane protein 185B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001242320.1
The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1 like 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1 like 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001002952.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001002952.1
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9MYU8.1); Region: Required for interaction with CRB1. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q9HCM4
Phosphoserine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q9HCM4; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9MYU8.1); phosphorylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9MYU8.1); Region: Disordered. /evidence=ECO:0000256|SAM:MobiDB-lite
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 23 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X1
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X13
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X12
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 4, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 isoform X9
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 isoform X8
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 isoform X6
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 isoform X5
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 isoform X3
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 isoform X2
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 isoform X1
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 isoform X11
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 isoform X10
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 isoform X12
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 isoform X7
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 isoform X4
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X4
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X3
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X7
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X5
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X11
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X9
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X17
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X13
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X14
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X18
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X19
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X23
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 221 isoform X2
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 221 isoform X1
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 221 isoform X3
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 221 isoform X4
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 221 isoform X5
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 221 isoform X8
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 221, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 221 isoform X7
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 221 isoform X6
secretin receptor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
secretin receptor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
secretin receptor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
secretin receptor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 37, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage-dependent calcium channel gamma-like subunit
diazepam binding inhibitor, acyl-CoA binding protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
diazepam binding inhibitor, acyl-CoA binding protein
N-acetylserine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P07107; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9TQX6.2); acetylation site
N6-acetyllysine, alternate. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P07108; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9TQX6.2); acetylation site
N6-acetyllysine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P07108; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9TQX6.2); acetylation site
Phosphotyrosine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P07108; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (Q9TQX6.2); phosphorylation site
chromosome 19 C2orf76 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 19 C2orf76 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 19 C2orf76 homolog, transcript variant X3
chromosome 19 C2orf76 homolog, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
UPF0538 protein C2orf76 homolog isoform X1
UPF0538 protein C2orf76 homolog isoform X2
UPF0538 protein C2orf76 homolog isoform X3
UPF0538 protein C2orf76 homolog isoform X4
STEAP3 metalloreductase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
STEAP3 metalloreductase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
STEAP3 metalloreductase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement C1q like 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement C1q like 2, transcript variant X2
complement C1q-like protein 2 isoform X1
complement C1q-like protein 2 isoform X2
macrophage receptor with collagenous structure, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage receptor with collagenous structure, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
engrailed homeobox 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111091156, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119864476, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864476, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119864476, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151514, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102151514, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151514, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102151514, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102151514, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102151514, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102151514, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102151514, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102151623, transcript variant X7
insulin induced gene 2, transcript variant X4
insulin induced gene 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin induced gene 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin induced gene 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin induced gene 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin-induced gene 2 protein isoform X2
insulin-induced gene 2 protein isoform X1
insulin-induced gene 2 protein isoform X3
insulin induced gene 2, transcript variant X6
insulin-induced gene 2 protein isoform X4
coiled-coil domain containing 93, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 93, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 93, transcript variant X18
coiled-coil domain containing 93, transcript variant X19
coiled-coil domain containing 93, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 93, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 93, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 93, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 93 isoform X8
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 93 isoform X9
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 93 isoform X10
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 5B-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 5B-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102152166, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102152166, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102152166, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102152166, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X45
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X43
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X44
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X40
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X42
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X39
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X46
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X41
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X47
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X48
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X49
uncharacterized LOC106560027, transcript variant X50
uncharacterized LOC111091158, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091158, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 237 Proteins, and 31% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111091160, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091160, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091160, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091160, transcript variant X4
dipeptidyl peptidase like 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
dipeptidyl peptidase like 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dipeptidyl peptidase like 10, transcript variant X3
inactive dipeptidyl peptidase 10 isoform X2
inactive dipeptidyl peptidase 10 isoform X1
dipeptidyl peptidase like 10, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
inactive dipeptidyl peptidase 10 isoform X3
dipeptidyl peptidase like 10, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
inactive dipeptidyl peptidase 10 isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X19
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X29
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X18
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X31
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X20
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X117
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X35
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X27
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X17
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X25
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X23
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X36
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X22
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X28
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X30
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X37
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X26
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X24
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X21
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X118
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X32
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X34
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X33
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X44
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X40
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X41
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X116
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X38
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X48
uncharacterized protein LOC111091159 isoform X25
uncharacterized protein LOC111091159 isoform X22
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X39
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X47
uncharacterized protein LOC111091159 isoform X4
uncharacterized protein LOC111091159 isoform X21
uncharacterized protein LOC111091159 isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X50
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X45
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X43
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X42
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X49
uncharacterized LOC111091159, transcript variant X46
uncharacterized protein LOC111091159 isoform X23
uncharacterized protein LOC111091159 isoform X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102152425, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102152425, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102152425, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102152425, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102152425, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119864478, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864478, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119864478, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119864478, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106560032, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC106560032, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC106560032, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102152824, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 31 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119864481, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864481, transcript variant X1
solute carrier family 35 member F5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member F5 isoform X2
solute carrier family 35 member F5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member F5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member F5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member F5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member F5, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member F5 isoform X1
solute carrier family 35 member F5 isoform X3
solute carrier family 35 member F5 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119864390, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC119864390, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC111091165, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091165, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: methylsterol monooxygenase 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
NCK associated protein 5, transcript variant X3
NCK associated protein 5, transcript variant X1
NCK associated protein 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
NCK associated protein 5, transcript variant X4
NCK associated protein 5, transcript variant X6
NCK associated protein 5, transcript variant X7
NCK associated protein 5, transcript variant X5
NCK associated protein 5, transcript variant X9
NCK associated protein 5, transcript variant X10
NCK associated protein 5, transcript variant X8
NCK associated protein 5, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosylglycoprotein 6-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosylglycoprotein 6-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosylglycoprotein 6-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosylglycoprotein 6-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosylglycoprotein 6-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosylglycoprotein 6-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant X24
alpha-1,6-mannosylglycoprotein 6-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosylglycoprotein 6-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase A isoform X4
transmembrane protein 163, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: transmembrane protein 163 isoform X1
aminocarboxymuconate semialdehyde decarboxylase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
aminocarboxymuconate semialdehyde decarboxylase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
aminocarboxymuconate semialdehyde decarboxylase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
2-amino-3-carboxymuconate-6-semialdehyde decarboxylase isoform X1
2-amino-3-carboxymuconate-6-semialdehyde decarboxylase isoform X2
2-amino-3-carboxymuconate-6-semialdehyde decarboxylase isoform X3
aminocarboxymuconate semialdehyde decarboxylase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
2-amino-3-carboxymuconate-6-semialdehyde decarboxylase isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X18
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X19
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X8
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X5
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X10
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X21
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X20
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X2
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X17
rab3 GTPase-activating protein catalytic subunit isoform X7
rab3 GTPase-activating protein catalytic subunit isoform X4
rab3 GTPase-activating protein catalytic subunit isoform X5
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X7
rab3 GTPase-activating protein catalytic subunit isoform X1
rab3 GTPase-activating protein catalytic subunit isoform X3
rab3 GTPase-activating protein catalytic subunit isoform X2
rab3 GTPase-activating protein catalytic subunit isoform X8
RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
rab3 GTPase-activating protein catalytic subunit isoform X6
rab3 GTPase-activating protein catalytic subunit isoform X9
zinc finger RANBP2-type containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger RANBP2-type containing 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger RANBP2-type containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger RANBP2-type containing 3, transcript variant X5
DNA annealing helicase and endonuclease ZRANB3 isoform X2
DNA annealing helicase and endonuclease ZRANB3 isoform X1
DNA annealing helicase and endonuclease ZRANB3 isoform X4
zinc finger RANBP2-type containing 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA annealing helicase and endonuclease ZRANB3 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X33
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X34
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X39
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X43
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X36
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X37
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X35
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X40
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X41
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X42
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X45
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X30
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X31
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X35
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X36
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X40
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X33
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X34
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X38
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X39
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X32
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X37
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X42
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X44
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X41
R3H domain containing 1, transcript variant X46
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
R3H domain-containing protein 1 isoform X43
microRNA mir-128-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
minichromosome maintenance complex component 6
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00581
aspartyl-tRNA synthetase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
aspartyl-tRNA synthetase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
aspartate--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic isoform X1
aspartate--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119864393, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864393, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106560058, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC106560058, transcript variant X1
thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 7B
thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing protein 7B
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X39
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X35
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X25
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X24
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X38
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X28
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X33
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X32
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X36
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X31
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X34
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X37
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X41
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X30
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X29
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X26
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X27
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X40
uncharacterized LOC102154499, transcript variant X42
histamine N-methyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
histamine N-methyltransferase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
histamine N-methyltransferase isoform X1
histamine N-methyltransferase isoform X2
translation initiation factor IF-2-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
translation initiation factor IF-2-like isoform X3
speckle type BTB/POZ protein like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
speckle type BTB/POZ protein like, transcript variant X1
speckle type BTB/POZ protein like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
speckle type BTB/POZ protein like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
speckle-type POZ protein-like isoform X1
speckle-type POZ protein-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102154919, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102154919, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102154919, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102154919, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102154919, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102154919, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102154919, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102154919, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102154919, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102154919, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
LDL receptor related protein 1B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1B isoform X6
suppressor of cytokine signaling 2-like, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: suppressor of cytokine signaling 2-like
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase A-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01210
uncharacterized LOC119864488, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC119864488, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119864488, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864488, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119864488, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119864488, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC119864488, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC119864488, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC119864488, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC119864488, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119864488, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119864488, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC119864397, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091183, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091183, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111091183, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091183, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091074, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091074, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 15, transcript variant X2
rho GTPase-activating protein 15 isoform X1
rho GTPase-activating protein 15 isoform X2
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X9
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
glycosyltransferase-like domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
glycosyltransferase-like domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
glycosyltransferase-like domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
glycosyltransferase-like domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X14
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X10
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X13
glycosyltransferase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosyltransferase-like domain-containing protein 1 isoform X7
glycosyltransferase-like domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
glycosyltransferase-like domain-containing protein 1 isoform X8
glycosyltransferase-like domain-containing protein 1 isoform X6
uncharacterized LOC119864490, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119864490, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119864490, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864490, transcript variant X3
zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 2 isoform X1
zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 2 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC102156269, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156269, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119864491, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864491, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC111091190, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091190, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111091190, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091190, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864492, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119864492, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091191, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091191, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091194, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC111091194, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091194, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091194, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091194, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111091078, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119864402, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156728, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC102156728, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC102156728, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156728, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102156728, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102156728, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102156728, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102156728, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156780, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156780, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091196, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091196, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156837, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102156837, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102156892, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091082, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091082, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins
activin A receptor type 2A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
activin A receptor type 2A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
origin recognition complex subunit 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
origin recognition complex subunit 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
origin recognition complex subunit 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphate carrier protein, mitochondrial-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: phosphate carrier protein, mitochondrial-like
uncharacterized LOC111091199, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091199, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111091199, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111091199, transcript variant X2
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X3
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X21
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X1
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X5
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X14
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X15
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X4
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X7
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X2
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X9
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X18
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X19
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X11
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X12
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X13
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X16
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X17
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5, transcript variant X8
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 5 isoform X1
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 5 isoform X2
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 5 isoform X3
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 5 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
enhancer of polycomb homolog 2, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: enhancer of polycomb homolog 2 isoform X1
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase NIMA-interacting 4-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
kinesin family member 5C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 5C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X47
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X4
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X3
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X1
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X2
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X49
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X41
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X44
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X43
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X42
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X45
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X46
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X48
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X6
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6B, transcript variant X5
ly6/PLAUR domain-containing protein 6B isoform X1
ly6/PLAUR domain-containing protein 6B isoform X2
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
metabolism of cobalamin associated D, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
metabolism of cobalamin associated D, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
cobalamin trafficking protein CblD isoform X2
cobalamin trafficking protein CblD isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111091083, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091083, transcript variant X1
Rho family GTPase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho-related GTP-binding protein RhoE isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC119864407, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119864408, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119864408, transcript variant X1
nuclear RNA export factor 2-like, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: nuclear RNA export factor 2-like isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC119864410, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC106560064, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106560064, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106560064, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC106560064, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized protein LOC106560064 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC102152847, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102152847, transcript variant X1
N-myc and STAT interactor, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111091205, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111091205, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111091205, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119864411, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102153053, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor-inducible gene 6 protein
uncharacterized LOC102153280, transcript variant X3
replication timing regulatory factor 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
replication timing regulatory factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
replication timing regulatory factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
replication timing regulatory factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
replication timing regulatory factor 1, transcript variant X3
telomere-associated protein RIF1 isoform X1
telomere-associated protein RIF1 isoform X4
telomere-associated protein RIF1 isoform X2
telomere-associated protein RIF1 isoform X3
telomere-associated protein RIF1 isoform X5
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: nebulin isoform X43
uncharacterized LOC119864501, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119864501, transcript variant X3
putative uncharacterized protein FLJ46204
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 4, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-4 isoform X1
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-4 isoform X2
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-4 isoform X7
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-4 isoform X3
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-4 isoform X4
signal transducing adaptor molecule 2, transcript variant X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: signal transducing adapter molecule 2 isoform X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: formin-like protein 2
uncharacterized LOC119864506, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119864506, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119864506, transcript variant X2
pre-mRNA processing factor 40 homolog A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 40 homolog A, transcript variant X4
pre-mRNA processing factor 40 homolog A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 40 homolog A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 40 homolog A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 40 homolog A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 40 homolog A, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 40 homolog A, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 40 homolog A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA-processing factor 40 homolog A isoform X7
pre-mRNA-processing factor 40 homolog A isoform X5
pre-mRNA-processing factor 40 homolog A isoform X4
pre-mRNA-processing factor 40 homolog A isoform X3
pre-mRNA-processing factor 40 homolog A isoform X1
pre-mRNA-processing factor 40 homolog A isoform X6
pre-mRNA-processing factor 40 homolog A isoform X2
pre-mRNA processing factor 40 homolog A, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA-processing factor 40 homolog A isoform X8
pre-mRNA-processing factor 40 homolog A isoform X9
pre-mRNA-processing factor 40 homolog A isoform X10
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6 interacting protein 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 6-interacting protein 6 isoform X2
USP6 N-terminal-like protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments