Calypte anna isolate BGI_N300 chromosome 4B, bCalAnn1_v1.p, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Archelosauria; Archosauria; Dinosauria; Saurischia; Theropoda; Coelurosauria; Aves; Neognathae; Apodiformes; Trochilidae; Calypte.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM012144.1.\nAssembly name: bCalAnn1_v1.p\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Vertebrate Genomes Project on\n2019/05/16. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession RRCD00000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Vertebrate Genomes Project\nAssembly Date :: 26-SEP-2018\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 5.1.1; FALCON unzip v. 1.0.2;\n scaff10X v. git 4.28.2018; Bionano Solve\n DLS v. 3.2.1; Salsa2 HiC v. 2.0;\n smrtanalysis Arrow polishing & gap\n filling v. 5.1.0.26412; longranger align\n v. 2.2.2; freebayes v. 1.2.0;\n purge_haplotigs v. bit 7.10.2018; gEVAL\n manual curation v. 2018-09-07\nAssembly Name :: bCalAnn1_v1.p\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: No\nGenome Coverage :: 54.0x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio RSII; 10X Genomics linked reads;\n Bionano Genomics DLS; Arima Genomics HiC\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Calypte anna Annotation Release 101\nAnnotation Version :: 101\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.2\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
PR domain zinc finger protein 5 isoform X1
PR domain zinc finger protein 5 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
exosome component 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
exosome complex component RRP45 isoform X1
exosome component 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
exosome complex component RRP45 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 60% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: short transient receptor potential channel 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 38 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
nudix hydrolase 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
nudix hydrolase 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X motif 6 isoform X1
nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X motif 6 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 23 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 27 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 50
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 4 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 17 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 4 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 8 isoform X1
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 8 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein domain family member 1B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein domain family member 1B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein domain family member 1B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein domain family member 1B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein domain family member 1B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein domain family member 1B, transcript variant X4
progesterone receptor membrane component 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 38 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane-associated progesterone receptor component 2
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X1
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X3
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X2
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 4B C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 4B C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X2
UPF0462 protein C4orf33 homolog isoform X1
UPF0462 protein C4orf33 homolog isoform X2
chromosome 4B C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X7
chromosome 4B C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X3
UPF0462 protein C4orf33 homolog isoform X3
chromosome 4B C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X5
chromosome 4B C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X4
chromosome 4B C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X6
UPF0462 protein C4orf33 homolog isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 30 Proteins, and 2% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 25 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 44 Proteins, and 44% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X8
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X1
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X2
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X3
mitochondria localized glutamic acid rich protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit C1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 subunit C1, mitochondrial
N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X1
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 7, histone lysine methyltransferase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETD7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mastermind like transcriptional coactivator 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mastermind like transcriptional coactivator 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 4 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like protein MGAT4D
ELMO domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ELMO domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ELMO domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
ELMO domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
TBC1 domain family member 9, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
TBC1 domain family member 9, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 11 Proteins, and 29% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
TBC1 domain family member 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 12 Proteins, and 34% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
TBC1 domain family member 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ring finger protein 150, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 8 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 150, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 23 bases in 20 codons; deleted 8 bases in 7 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 23 bases in 20 codons; deleted 8 bases in 7 codons; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 38
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: GRB2-associated-binding protein 1
SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily A member 5
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 7 bases in 6 codons; deleted 5 bases in 4 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 31% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 7 bases in 6 codons; deleted 5 bases in 4 codons; substituted 3 bases at 3 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: FRAS1-related extracellular matrix protein 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
anaphase promoting complex subunit 10, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
anaphase-promoting complex subunit 10 isoform X2
anaphase promoting complex subunit 10, transcript variant X8
anaphase-promoting complex subunit 10 isoform X3
anaphase promoting complex subunit 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
anaphase promoting complex subunit 10, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
anaphase promoting complex subunit 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
anaphase promoting complex subunit 10, transcript variant X5
anaphase promoting complex subunit 10, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
anaphase promoting complex subunit 10, transcript variant X6
anaphase-promoting complex subunit 10 isoform X1
ATP binding cassette subfamily E member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 28 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily E member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 28 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily E member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 28 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily E member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 28 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-binding cassette sub-family E member 1
OTU deubiquitinase 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
OTU deubiquitinase 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
OTU deubiquitinase 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
OTU deubiquitinase 4, transcript variant X2
OTU domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
OTU domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
OTU domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
OTU deubiquitinase 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
OTU domain-containing protein 4 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 51 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 1
metabolism of cobalamin associated A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
metabolism of cobalamin associated A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
methylmalonic aciduria type A protein, mitochondrial
zinc finger protein 827, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 827, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 827, transcript variant X3
zinc finger protein 827, transcript variant X4
LSM6 homolog, U6 small nuclear RNA and mRNA degradation associated
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins
POU domain, class 4, transcription factor 2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 33% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: tetratricopeptide repeat protein 29
endothelin receptor type A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
endothelin receptor type A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
endothelin receptor type A, transcript variant X3
transmembrane protein 184C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 184C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein arginine methyltransferase 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein arginine methyltransferase 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
protein arginine methyltransferase 9, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein arginine methyltransferase 9, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 9 isoform X1
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 9 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 30 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 22 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, 37 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 22 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 37 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK2
LPS responsive beige-like anchor protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
LPS responsive beige-like anchor protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LPS responsive beige-like anchor protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
LPS responsive beige-like anchor protein, transcript variant X4
LPS responsive beige-like anchor protein, transcript variant X5
lipopolysaccharide-responsive and beige-like anchor protein isoform X2
lipopolysaccharide-responsive and beige-like anchor protein isoform X1
lipopolysaccharide-responsive and beige-like anchor protein isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1K, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1K, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1K, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1K, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1K, mitochondrial isoform X1
protein phosphatase 1K, mitochondrial isoform X2
WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat and FYVE domain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
WD repeat and FYVE domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
WD repeat and FYVE domain-containing protein 3 isoform X4
WD repeat and FYVE domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins
abraxas 1, BRCA1 A complex subunit, transcript variant X2
abraxas 1, BRCA1 A complex subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
abraxas 1, BRCA1 A complex subunit, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
BRCA1-A complex subunit Abraxas 1 isoform X1
abraxas 1, BRCA1 A complex subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
BRCA1-A complex subunit Abraxas 1 isoform X2
BRCA1-A complex subunit Abraxas 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
28S ribosomal protein S18c, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
4-hydroxybenzoate polyprenyltransferase, mitochondrial
placenta associated 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
placenta-specific gene 8 protein isoform X2
placenta associated 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
placenta-specific gene 8 protein isoform X1
ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (Junior blood group)
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 2
polycystin 2, transient receptor potential cation channel
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 35% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
nudix hydrolase 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
nudix hydrolase 9, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
nudix hydrolase 9, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
nudix hydrolase 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase, mitochondrial isoform X4
ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase, mitochondrial isoform X3
ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase, mitochondrial isoform X1
ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase, mitochondrial isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 8, transcript variant X1
kelch like family member 8, transcript variant X4
kelch like family member 8, transcript variant X2
kelch like family member 8, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 8, transcript variant X6
kelch like family member 8, transcript variant X3
AF4/FMR2 family member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
AF4/FMR2 family member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 13
mitogen-activated protein kinase 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 60% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mitogen-activated protein kinase 10, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mitogen-activated protein kinase 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 48% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mitogen-activated protein kinase 10 isoform X1
mitogen-activated protein kinase 10 isoform X3
mitogen-activated protein kinase 10 isoform X2
Rho GTPase activating protein 24, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 24, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 24, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 24, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 24, transcript variant X6
Rho GTPase activating protein 24, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 24, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 24 isoform X1
rho GTPase-activating protein 24 isoform X3
rho GTPase-activating protein 24 isoform X4
rho GTPase-activating protein 24 isoform X2
COP9 signalosome subunit 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
COP9 signalosome subunit 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
COP9 signalosome complex subunit 4 isoform X1
COP9 signalosome complex subunit 4 isoform X2
lin-54 DREAM MuvB core complex component, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lin-54 DREAM MuvB core complex component, transcript variant X1
lin-54 DREAM MuvB core complex component, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lin-54 DREAM MuvB core complex component, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
THAP domain containing 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
THAP domain containing 9, transcript variant X2
SEC31 homolog A, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SEC31 homolog A, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC31 homolog A, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SEC31 homolog A, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC31 homolog A, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SEC31 homolog A, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC31 homolog A, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC31 homolog A, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
protein transport protein Sec31A isoform X1
protein transport protein Sec31A isoform X5
protein transport protein Sec31A isoform X6
protein transport protein Sec31A isoform X2
protein transport protein Sec31A isoform X7
protein transport protein Sec31A isoform X8
protein transport protein Sec31A isoform X3
SEC31 homolog A, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X5
protein transport protein Sec31A isoform X4
stearoyl-CoA desaturase 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
stearoyl-CoA desaturase 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 150C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
enolase-phosphatase 1, transcript variant X6
transmembrane protein 150C, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 150C, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 150C, transcript variant X5
transmembrane protein 150C, transcript variant X6
transmembrane protein 150C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 150C, transcript variant X3
enolase-phosphatase 1, transcript variant X5
enolase-phosphatase 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
enolase-phosphatase 1, transcript variant X2
enolase-phosphatase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
enolase-phosphatase 1, transcript variant X7
enolase-phosphatase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
enolase-phosphatase 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
enolase-phosphatase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 70 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D-like
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 31 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 31 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 34 ESTs, 31 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D0
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD2A
ribosomal protein L7 like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein L7 like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein L7 like 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein L7 like 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
inactive ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 53
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 18 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X9
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X6
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X5
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X4
protein transport protein Sec24D isoform X1
protein transport protein Sec24D isoform X4
protein transport protein Sec24D isoform X2
protein transport protein Sec24D isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
N6-adenosine-methyltransferase non-catalytic subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 24 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00399
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
bifunctional heparan sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins
bifunctional heparan sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 4
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X5
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X4
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X6
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X3
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X7
2-hydroxyacylsphingosine 1-beta-galactosyltransferase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 22 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X1
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X2
sortilin related VPS10 domain containing receptor 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: actin filament-associated protein 1
actin binding LIM protein family member 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
actin binding LIM protein family member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
actin binding LIM protein family member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
actin binding LIM protein family member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeats 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein 1
HtrA serine peptidase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
HtrA serine peptidase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
acyl-CoA oxidase 3, pristanoyl, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
acyl-CoA oxidase 3, pristanoyl, transcript variant X2
acyl-CoA oxidase 3, pristanoyl, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
acyl-CoA oxidase 3, pristanoyl, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 3 isoform X1
peroxisomal acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable tRNA (uracil-O(2)-)-methyltransferase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 47% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: homeobox protein HMX1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LDL receptor related protein associated protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 37 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-2-macroglobulin receptor-associated protein
docking protein 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
docking protein 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
docking protein 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
docking protein 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
hepatocyte growth factor activator isoform X2
hepatocyte growth factor activator isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Myb/SANT DNA binding domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
myb/SANT-like DNA-binding domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 10, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 10, transcript variant X2
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 10, transcript variant X4
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 10, transcript variant X1
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 10, transcript variant X6
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 10, transcript variant X5
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 10 isoform X1
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 10 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 32 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 38 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 34 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 193 member A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ring finger protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF4 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF4 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC115598352, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC115598352, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 99
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 40% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 99
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
lateral signaling target protein 2 homolog
MAX dimerization protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
MAX dimerization protein 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 48 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
MAX dimerization protein 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
MAX dimerization protein 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 3% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: N-acetylaspartate synthetase
chromosome 4B C4orf48 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 4B C4orf48 homolog, transcript variant X2
chromosome 4B C4orf48 homolog, transcript variant X3
neuropeptide-like protein C4orf48 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
negative elongation factor complex member A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00427
leucine zipper and EF-hand containing transmembrane protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial proton/calcium exchanger protein
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 4 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 4 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: fibroblast growth factor receptor 3
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 3, transcript variant X2
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 3 isoform X1
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 3 isoform X2
transmembrane protein 129, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 129, transcript variant X3
transmembrane protein 129, transcript variant X2
transmembrane protein 129, transcript variant X4
transmembrane protein 129, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
stem-loop binding protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
stem-loop binding protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
histone RNA hairpin-binding protein isoform X2
histone RNA hairpin-binding protein isoform X1
family with sequence similarity 53 member A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 32 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 53 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 32 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 53 member A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 53 member A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 32 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 53 member A, transcript variant X6
family with sequence similarity 53 member A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 32 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 53 member A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 32 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
NK1 transcription factor-related protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
macrophage erythroblast attacher, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage erythroblast attacher, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage erythroblast attacher, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage erythroblast attacher, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage erythroblast attacher, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage erythroblast attacher, transcript variant X1
macrophage erythroblast attacher, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage erythroblast attacher, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein transferase MAEA isoform X4
E3 ubiquitin-protein transferase MAEA isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein transferase MAEA isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein transferase MAEA isoform X1
C-terminal binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
C-terminal binding protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
C-terminal binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 41 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
C-terminal binding protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
C-terminal binding protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane emp24 domain-containing protein 11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 Proteins
fibroblast growth factor receptor like 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor like 1, transcript variant X2
fibroblast growth factor receptor like 1, transcript variant X1
fibroblast growth factor receptor like 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor-like 1 isoform X2
fibroblast growth factor receptor-like 1 isoform X1
fibroblast growth factor receptor-like 1 isoform X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein atonal homolog 8
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 5, transcript variant X3
lactosylceramide alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase isoform X1
lactosylceramide alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase isoform X2
lactosylceramide alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase isoform X3
lactosylceramide alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase isoform X4
RNA polymerase I subunit A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RNA polymerase I subunit A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DNA-directed RNA polymerase I subunit RPA1 isoform X2
DNA-directed RNA polymerase I subunit RPA1 isoform X1
pentatricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pentatricopeptide repeat domain-containing protein 3, mitochondrial isoform X1
pentatricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
pentatricopeptide repeat domain-containing protein 3, mitochondrial isoform X2
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00613
inner membrane mitochondrial protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 24 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
inner membrane mitochondrial protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
inner membrane mitochondrial protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
inner membrane mitochondrial protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
39S ribosomal protein L35, mitochondrial
receptor accessory protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
receptor accessory protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
receptor accessory protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor expression-enhancing protein 1 isoform X2
receptor expression-enhancing protein 1 isoform X1
receptor expression-enhancing protein 1 isoform X3
lysine demethylase 3A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 42 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lysine demethylase 3A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 42 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lysine demethylase 3A, transcript variant X3
lysine demethylase 3A, transcript variant X2
charged multivesicular body protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
charged multivesicular body protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
charged multivesicular body protein 3 isoform X3
charged multivesicular body protein 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
charged multivesicular body protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 45 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF103 isoform X1
required for meiotic nuclear division 5 homolog A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 39 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: T-cell surface glycoprotein CD8 beta chain
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SET and MYND domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET and MYND domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SMYD1 isoform X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SMYD1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
threonine synthase like 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
threonine synthase like 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
threonine synthase like 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
threonine synthase like 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha kinase 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 43 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
succinate--CoA ligase [ADP/GDP-forming] subunit alpha, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA methionine (anticodon CAU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
leucine rich repeat transmembrane neuronal 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins
leucine-rich repeat transmembrane neuronal protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 22 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 24, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 24, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 24, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 24, transcript variant X3
ring finger protein 24, transcript variant X4
ring finger protein 24, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 24, transcript variant X5
pantothenate kinase 2, transcript variant X2
pantothenate kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pantothenate kinase 2, mitochondrial isoform X1
pantothenate kinase 2, mitochondrial isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC103528303, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC103528303, transcript variant X2
protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type A
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase alpha
leucine zipper tumor suppressor family member 3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: leucine zipper putative tumor suppressor 3
uncharacterized LOC115598333, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC115598333, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: sodium bicarbonate transporter-like protein 11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C20orf194 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 33
ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein, transcript variant X3
ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 39% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
protease-associated domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET and MYND domain-containing protein 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC103531235 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC103531235 isoform X1
rab11 family-interacting protein 5 isoform X5
uncharacterized protein LOC103531235 isoform X3
uncharacterized protein LOC103531235 isoform X4
rab11 family-interacting protein 5 isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sepiapterin reductase, transcript variant X2
sepiapterin reductase, transcript variant X1
exocyst complex component 6B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
exocyst complex component 6B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
exocyst complex component 6B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 638, transcript variant X5
zinc finger protein 638, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 638, transcript variant X2
zinc finger protein 638, transcript variant X3
zinc finger protein 638, transcript variant X6
zinc finger protein 638, transcript variant X1
zinc finger protein 638, transcript variant X8
zinc finger protein 638, transcript variant X7
poly(A) binding protein interacting protein 2B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(A) binding protein interacting protein 2B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(A) binding protein interacting protein 2B, transcript variant X4
poly(A) binding protein interacting protein 2B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
polyadenylate-binding protein-interacting protein 2B isoform X1
polyadenylate-binding protein-interacting protein 2B isoform X3
polyadenylate-binding protein-interacting protein 2B isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
V-type proton ATPase subunit B, kidney isoform
ventral anterior homeobox 2, transcript variant X2
ventral anterior homeobox 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 12B
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; deleted 4 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; deleted 4 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: heat shock 70 kDa protein 12B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 35% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
adaptor related protein complex 5 subunit sigma 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
C-type lectin domain family 4 member F-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
C-type lectin domain family 4 member F-like, transcript variant X2
C-type lectin domain family 4 member F-like, transcript variant X1
C-type lectin domain family 4 member F-like isoform X3
C-type lectin domain family 4 member F-like isoform X2
C-type lectin domain family 4 member F-like isoform X1
RING finger protein 145, transcript variant X2
RING finger protein 145, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: transcription factor COE4-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: probable carboxypeptidase X1
N-acetyltransferase 8 (putative), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-acetyltransferase 8 (putative), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
isocitrate dehydrogenase (NAD(+)) 3 non-catalytic subunit beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
isocitrate dehydrogenase (NAD(+)) 3 non-catalytic subunit beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
isocitrate dehydrogenase [NAD] subunit beta, mitochondrial isoform X2
isocitrate dehydrogenase [NAD] subunit beta, mitochondrial isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00274
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00275
dynactin subunit 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
dynactin subunit 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
dynactin subunit 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
WD repeat domain 54, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 54, transcript variant X2
WD repeat-containing protein 54 isoform X1
WD repeat-containing protein 54 isoform X2
rho-related BTB domain-containing protein 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: mannosyl-oligosaccharide glucosidase
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: coiled-coil domain-containing protein 142
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 59% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
polycomb group ring finger 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
polycomb group ring finger 1, transcript variant X3
polycomb group ring finger 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
polycomb group RING finger protein 1 isoform X3
polycomb group RING finger protein 1 isoform X2
polycomb group RING finger protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ATP-dependent RNA helicase DQX1
BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein 3-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein 3-like, transcript variant X1
BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein 3-like isoform X2
BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein 3-like isoform X1
AUP1 lipid droplet regulating VLDL assembly factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
AUP1 lipid droplet regulating VLDL assembly factor, transcript variant X2
HtrA serine peptidase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
HtrA serine peptidase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine protease HTRA2, mitochondrial isoform X1
serine protease HTRA2, mitochondrial isoform X2
lysyl oxidase like 3, transcript variant X2
lysyl oxidase like 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysyl oxidase like 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lysyl oxidase like 3, transcript variant X5
lysyl oxidase like 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysyl oxidase like 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
docking protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
docking protein 1, transcript variant X2
meiosis 1 associated protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
meiosis 1 associated protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
meiosis 1 associated protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments