Catharus ustulatus isolate bCatUst1 chromosome 25, bCatUst1.pri.v2, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Archelosauria; Archosauria; Dinosauria; Saurischia; Theropoda; Coelurosauria; Aves; Neognathae; Passeriformes; Turdidae; Catharus.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM020360.1.\nAssembly name: bCatUst1.pri.v2\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Vertebrate Genomes Project on\n2020/12/22. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession WNMQ00000000.2.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Vertebrate Genomes Project\nAssembly Date :: 06-AUG-2020\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. DX 1.9.0; FALCON-Unzip v.\n 6.0.0.47841; purge_dups github v.\n purge_haplotig (bitbucket v1.0.3+\n 1.Nov.2018); Scaff10x v. 2; Bionano Solve\n v. 3.2.1_04122018; Salsa2 HiC v. 2.2;\n Arrow polishing and gap filling v.\n Smrtlink_6.0.0.47841; Longranger Align v.\n 2.2.2; freebayes v. 1.3.1; gEVAL manual\n curation v. 2020-08-06; VGP assembly\n pipeline v. 1.5\nAssembly Name :: bCatUst1.pri.v2\nDiploid :: Principal pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: No\nGenome Coverage :: 60.58x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel I CLR; Illumina NovaSeq;\n Arima Genomics Hi-C; Bionano Genomics DLS\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Catharus ustulatus Annotation\n Release 101\nAnnotation Version :: 101\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 9.0\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: polyA evidence [ECO:0006239]
uncharacterized LOC117007109, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC117007109, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
membrane-associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
membrane associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
membrane associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
membrane-associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
membrane-associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
leucine rich repeats and immunoglobulin like domains 2, transcript variant X2
leucine rich repeats and immunoglobulin like domains 2, transcript variant X1
leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains protein 2 isoform X1
leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains protein 2 isoform X2
solute carrier family 16 member 1, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 16 member 1, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 16 member 1, transcript variant X1
TAFA chemokine like family member 3, transcript variant X6
TAFA chemokine like family member 3, transcript variant X2
TAFA chemokine like family member 3, transcript variant X5
TAFA chemokine like family member 3, transcript variant X1
TAFA chemokine like family member 3, transcript variant X4
TAFA chemokine like family member 3, transcript variant X3
chemokine-like protein TAFA-3 isoform X3
chemokine-like protein TAFA-3 isoform X2
chemokine-like protein TAFA-3 isoform X1
protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1J
ras homolog family member C, transcript variant X1
ras homolog family member C, transcript variant X2
ras homolog family member C, transcript variant X3
rho-related GTP-binding protein RhoC isoform X2
rho-related GTP-binding protein RhoC isoform X1
rho-related GTP-binding protein RhoC isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 40% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
capping actin protein of muscle Z-line subunit alpha 1
suppressor of tumorigenicity 7 protein-like
CTTNBP2 N-terminal like, transcript variant X2
CTTNBP2 N-terminal like, transcript variant X1
CTTNBP2 N-terminal-like protein isoform X1
CTTNBP2 N-terminal-like protein isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3 isoform X1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3 isoform X2
probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase peripheral stalk-membrane subunit b
ATP synthase F(0) complex subunit B1, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 33% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein C6orf132 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon regulatory factor 6, transcript variant X2
interferon regulatory factor 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
TRAF3-interacting JNK-activating modulator
corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1-like isoform X2
corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1-like, transcript variant X1
corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1-like isoform X1
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase IG, transcript variant X1
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase IG, transcript variant X2
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type 1G isoform X2
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type 1G isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34
membrane cofactor protein-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane cofactor protein-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane cofactor protein-like isoform X2
membrane cofactor protein-like, transcript variant X4
membrane cofactor protein-like, transcript variant X1
membrane cofactor protein-like isoform X3
membrane cofactor protein-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 48% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
complement decay-accelerating factor-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 2, transcript variant X3
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 2 isoform X3
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 2 isoform X2
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 2 isoform X1
chromosome 25 C1orf116 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 25 C1orf116 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
specifically androgen-regulated gene protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation regulated kinase 3
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 3
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2D
Ras association domain family member 5, transcript variant X1
Ras association domain family member 5, transcript variant X2
ras association domain-containing protein 5 isoform X1
ras association domain-containing protein 5 isoform X2
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X3
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X1
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X2
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X2
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X1
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X3
family with sequence similarity 72 member A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 72 member A, transcript variant X2
family with sequence similarity 72 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 17 Proteins
regulator of hemoglobinization and erythroid cell expansion
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
regulator of hemoglobinization and erythroid cell expansion protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
RAB7B, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB7B, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
N-fatty-acyl-amino acid synthase/hydrolase PM20D1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear casein kinase and cyclin dependent kinase substrate 1, transcript variant X1
nuclear casein kinase and cyclin dependent kinase substrate 1, transcript variant X2
nuclear ubiquitous casein and cyclin-dependent kinase substrate 1 isoform X1
nuclear ubiquitous casein and cyclin-dependent kinase substrate 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 4A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 4A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC117007300, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC117007300, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA tryptophan (anticodon CCA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
kelch domain containing 8A, transcript variant X1
kelch domain containing 8A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain family 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains protein 2
dual serine/threonine and tyrosine protein kinase, transcript variant X1
dual serine/threonine and tyrosine protein kinase, transcript variant X2
dual serine/threonine and tyrosine protein kinase, transcript variant X3
dual serine/threonine and tyrosine protein kinase isoform X1
dual serine/threonine and tyrosine protein kinase isoform X2
dual serine/threonine and tyrosine protein kinase isoform X3
RB binding protein 5, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 27 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA lysine (anticodon UUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 beta
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 3-kinase C2 domain-containing subunit beta
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 15B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 15B, transcript variant X1
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 15B isoform X1
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 15B isoform X2
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X2
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X10
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X4
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X7
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X1
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X6
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X8
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X2
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X3
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X9
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ethanolamine kinase 2
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X3
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X2
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X5
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X1
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X4
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 4 bases in 4 codons
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 4 bases in 4 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 11A
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X4
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X6
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X1
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X7
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X5
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X2
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X3
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X2
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X1
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X5
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X4
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
proline and arginine rich end leucine rich repeat protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: acidic mammalian chitinase-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator complex subunit 20, transcript variant X1
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 20 isoform X1
mediator complex subunit 20, transcript variant X2
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 20 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 49
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 6
mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM6 homolog
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: basic proline-rich protein-like
prickle planar cell polarity protein 4, transcript variant X2
prickle planar cell polarity protein 4, transcript variant X1
prickle planar cell polarity protein 4, transcript variant X4
prickle planar cell polarity protein 4, transcript variant X3
fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 3, transcript variant X1
fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 3 isoform X1
fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transcription factor EB, transcript variant X1
transcription factor EB, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 1 EST, 36 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X4
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X2
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X3
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X11
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X8
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X7
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X10
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X5
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X9
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X6
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X1
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X9
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X6
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X5
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X8
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X2
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X3
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X7
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X4
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X1
O-acyl-ADP-ribose deacylase 1, transcript variant X1
ADP-ribose glycohydrolase OARD1 isoform X1
O-acyl-ADP-ribose deacylase 1, transcript variant X3
O-acyl-ADP-ribose deacylase 1, transcript variant X2
ADP-ribose glycohydrolase OARD1 isoform X2
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 2
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 8 bases in 6 codons
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 8 bases in 6 codons; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 3
ubiquinol-cytochrome-c reductase complex assembly factor 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 118 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamate metabotropic receptor 4, transcript variant X1
glutamate metabotropic receptor 4, transcript variant X2
high mobility group AT-hook 1, transcript variant X1
high mobility group AT-hook 1, transcript variant X2
high mobility group AT-hook 1, transcript variant X3
high mobility group protein HMG-I/HMG-Y isoform X1
high mobility group protein HMG-I/HMG-Y isoform X2
high mobility group protein HMG-I/HMG-Y isoform X3
diphosphoinositol polyphosphate phosphohydrolase 1
ribosomal protein S10, transcript variant X2
ribosomal protein S10, transcript variant X4
ribosomal protein S10, transcript variant X3
ribosomal protein S10, transcript variant X1
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 1
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons protein 1
SAM pointed domain containing ETS transcription factor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SAM pointed domain-containing Ets transcription factor
inflammation and lipid regulator with UBA-like and NBR1-like domains
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide C, transcript variant X1
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide C, transcript variant X2
U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein C isoform X1
U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein C isoform X2
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 11
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 11
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X1
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X2
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X3
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X5
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X4
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X6
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X3
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X2
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X1
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X5
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X4
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X6
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X7
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X7
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X8
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X8
signal peptide, CUB domain and EGF like domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
signal peptide, CUB domain and EGF like domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
signal peptide, CUB domain and EGF like domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
differentially expressed in FDCP 6 homolog
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta, transcript variant X1
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta, transcript variant X3
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta, transcript variant X4
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta, transcript variant X2
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta isoform X1
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta isoform X2
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase makorin-1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
FA complementation group E, transcript variant X1
FA complementation group E, transcript variant X2
Fanconi anemia group E protein isoform X2
Fanconi anemia group E protein isoform X1
inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor associated 2-like, transcript variant X2
inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor associated 2-like, transcript variant X3
inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor associated 2-like, transcript variant X1
inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor associated 1-like isoform X1
inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor associated 2-like isoform X2
inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor associated 2-like isoform X3
inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor associated 2-like, transcript variant X4
inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor associated 2-like isoform X4
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X1
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X2
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5 isoform X1
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
LHFPL tetraspan subfamily member 5 protein
SRSF protein kinase 1, transcript variant X1
SRSF protein kinase 1, transcript variant X2
mitogen-activated protein kinase 14, transcript variant X2
mitogen-activated protein kinase 14, transcript variant X1
mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X2
mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X1
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 3, transcript variant X1
bromodomain and PHD finger-containing protein 3 isoform X1
bromodomain and PHD finger-containing protein 3 isoform X3
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 3, transcript variant X2
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 3, transcript variant X3
bromodomain and PHD finger-containing protein 3 isoform X2
putative homeodomain transcription factor 1
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 22
adaptor related protein complex 4 subunit beta 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
homeodomain interacting protein kinase 1, transcript variant X1
homeodomain interacting protein kinase 1, transcript variant X2
homeodomain interacting protein kinase 1, transcript variant X3
homeodomain interacting protein kinase 1, transcript variant X4
homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 1 isoform X1
homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 1 isoform X2
homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 1 isoform X3
homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 1 isoform X4
DENN domain containing 2C, transcript variant X1
DENN domain containing 2C, transcript variant X2
DENN domain-containing protein 2C isoform X1
DENN domain-containing protein 2C isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 57 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
thyroid stimulating hormone subunit beta, transcript variant X6
thyroid stimulating hormone subunit beta, transcript variant X5
thyroid stimulating hormone subunit beta, transcript variant X1
thyroid stimulating hormone subunit beta, transcript variant X2
thyroid stimulating hormone subunit beta, transcript variant X3
thyroid stimulating hormone subunit beta, transcript variant X4
nerve growth factor, transcript variant X2
nerve growth factor, transcript variant X1
Pim-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase, transcript variant X2
Pim-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase, transcript variant X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase pim-1 isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase pim-1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2
peptidase inhibitor 16-like, transcript variant X2
peptidase inhibitor 16-like, transcript variant X1
bombesin receptor-activated protein C6orf89 homolog
serine and arginine rich splicing factor 3
serine/threonine kinase 38, transcript variant X2
serine/threonine kinase 38, transcript variant X3
serine/threonine kinase 38, transcript variant X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase 38 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase 38 isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase 38 isoform X3
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X2
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X3
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X1
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X5
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X4
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD20 isoform X3
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD20 isoform X1
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD20 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
patatin like phospholipase domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3-like
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X5
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X4
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X2
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X3
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 10, transcript variant X1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 10, transcript variant X2
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X2
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily C member 4 isoform X2
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X3
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily C member 4 isoform X1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily C member 4 isoform X3
sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter SLC6A17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
striatin interacting protein 1, transcript variant X3
striatin interacting protein 1, transcript variant X1
striatin interacting protein 1, transcript variant X2
striatin interacting protein 1, transcript variant X4
striatin-interacting protein 1 isoform X3
striatin-interacting protein 1 isoform X1
striatin-interacting protein 1 isoform X2
striatin-interacting protein 1 isoform X4
adenosylhomocysteinase like 1, transcript variant X1
adenosylhomocysteinase like 1, transcript variant X4
adenosylhomocysteinase like 1, transcript variant X3
S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase-like protein 1 isoform X1
S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase-like protein 1 isoform X3
adenosylhomocysteinase like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase-like protein 1 isoform X2
colony stimulating factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 isoform X4
macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 isoform X2
macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 isoform X1
macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 59% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
epidermal growth factor receptor kinase substrate 8-like protein 3
glutathione S-transferase 2, transcript variant X3
glutathione S-transferase 2, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC117007259, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC117007259, transcript variant X1
glutathione S-transferase 2, transcript variant X2
G protein subunit alpha transducin 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 96 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
G protein subunit alpha transducin 2, transcript variant X1
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(t) subunit alpha-2 isoform X1
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(t) subunit alpha-2 isoform X2
G protein subunit alpha i3, transcript variant X2
G protein subunit alpha i3, transcript variant X1
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) subunit alpha-3
G protein-coupled receptor 61, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 61, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
G-protein coupled receptor 61 isoform X2
G-protein coupled receptor 61 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 S
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 4 codons; deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 4 codons; deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1S
kinesin family member 21B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 21B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 21B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 21B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 21B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 21B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 7, transcript variant X2
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 7, transcript variant X1
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 7, transcript variant X3
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 7
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase V-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase V-like, transcript variant X2
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase V-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase V-like isoform X3
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase V-like isoform X1
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase V-like isoform X2
leucine rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 6
leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
RAB interacting factor, transcript variant X1
RAB interacting factor, transcript variant X2
leucine zipper like transcription regulator 1
leucine-zipper-like transcriptional regulator 1
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X2
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X4
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X2
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X5
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X2
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X5
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X4
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X3
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X1
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X4
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X3
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X1
pleckstrin homology like domain family A member 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology-like domain family A member 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
troponin T2, cardiac type, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 Proteins
troponin T2, cardiac type, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
immunoglobulin like and fibronectin type III domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
immunoglobulin-like and fibronectin type III domain-containing protein 1
proton-transporting V-type ATPase complex assembly regulator TMEM9
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like isoform X1
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like isoform X2
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like isoform X3
transmembrane protein 183A, transcript variant X1
transmembrane protein 183A, transcript variant X2
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X1
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X3
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X6
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X7
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X8
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X4
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X5
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 18 Proteins, and 19% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DENN domain containing 2D, transcript variant X2
DENN domain-containing protein 2D isoform X2
DENN domain containing 2D, transcript variant X1
DENN domain-containing protein 2D isoform X1
choline/ethanolamine phosphotransferase 1, transcript variant X1
choline/ethanolamine phosphotransferase 1, transcript variant X2
choline/ethanolamine phosphotransferase 1, transcript variant X3
choline/ethanolaminephosphotransferase 1 isoform X1
choline/ethanolaminephosphotransferase 1 isoform X2
DNA damage regulated autophagy modulator 2, transcript variant X1
DNA damage regulated autophagy modulator 2, transcript variant X2
DNA damage-regulated autophagy modulator protein 2
ligand dependent nuclear receptor interacting factor 1, transcript variant X1
ligand dependent nuclear receptor interacting factor 1, transcript variant X3
ligand dependent nuclear receptor interacting factor 1, transcript variant X2
ligand-dependent nuclear receptor-interacting factor 1 isoform X1
ligand-dependent nuclear receptor-interacting factor 1 isoform X2
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 T, transcript variant X5
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 T, transcript variant X4
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 T, transcript variant X3
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 T, transcript variant X1
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 T, transcript variant X2
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 T, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 T, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 17A
mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit Tim17-A
shisa family member 4, transcript variant X1
shisa family member 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01268
endosome-lysosome associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1, transcript variant X4
endosome-lysosome associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1, transcript variant X1
endosome-lysosome associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1, transcript variant X2
endosome/lysosome-associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1 isoform X1
endosome/lysosome-associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1 isoform X4
endosome/lysosome-associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1 isoform X2
endosome-lysosome associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1, transcript variant X3
endosome/lysosome-associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1 isoform X3
cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 2, transcript variant X1
cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 2, transcript variant X2
cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 2 isoform X2
cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 2 isoform X1
proline and serine rich coiled-coil 1, transcript variant X5
proline and serine rich coiled-coil 1, transcript variant X3
proline and serine rich coiled-coil 1, transcript variant X2
proline and serine rich coiled-coil 1, transcript variant X4
proline and serine rich coiled-coil 1, transcript variant X1
proline/serine-rich coiled-coil protein 1 isoform X2
proline/serine-rich coiled-coil protein 1 isoform X1
proline/serine-rich coiled-coil protein 1 isoform X3
peptidylprolyl isomerase like 1, transcript variant X1
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase-like 1 isoform X1
peptidylprolyl isomerase like 1, transcript variant X2
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase-like 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: CBL-interacting protein kinase 6-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 219 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: flocculation protein FLO11-like
gastrula zinc finger protein XlCGF49.1-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: gastrula zinc finger protein XlCGF49.1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
DLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DR-1 beta chain-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain-containing protein 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments