Meleagris gallopavo isolate NT-WF06-2002-E0010 breed Aviagen turkey brand Nicholas breeding stock chromosome 18, Turkey_5.1, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Archelosauria; Archosauria; Dinosauria; Saurischia; Theropoda; Coelurosauria; Aves; Neognathae; Galloanserae; Galliformes; Phasianidae; Meleagridinae; Meleagris.
Multi-platform next-generation sequencing of the domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo): genome assembly and analysis
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM000979.2.\nOn Dec 18, 2014 this sequence version replaced NC_015028.1.\nAssembly name: Turkey_5.1\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Turkey Genome Consortium on\n2014/11/24. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession ADDD00000000.2.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Turkey Genome Consortium\nAssembly Date :: 2013\nAssembly Method :: MaSuRCA v. 1.9.2\nAssembly Name :: Turkey_5.0\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 35.0x\nSequencing Technology :: Illumina GAII; Sanger; 454\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Meleagris gallopavo Annotation\n Release 103\nAnnotation Version :: 103\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.2\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Aviagen turkey brand Nicholas breeding stock
donated by Nicholas Turkey Breeding Farms
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
antigen-presenting glycoprotein CD1d-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
antigen-presenting glycoprotein CD1d-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
antigen-presenting glycoprotein CD1d-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 106 samples with support for all annotated introns
antigen-presenting glycoprotein CD1d-like isoform X1
antigen-presenting glycoprotein CD1d-like isoform X2
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1b-3-like isoform X3
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1b-3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 82 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1b-3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 160 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1b-3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1b-3 isoform X1
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1b-3 isoform X2
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1b-3 isoform X3
leukotriene B4 receptor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
leukotriene B4 receptor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 177 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 142 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: antigen peptide transporter 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 162 samples with support for all annotated introns
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 223 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 313 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain isoform X2
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain isoform X1
HLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DM beta chain
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 212 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: HLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DM beta chain
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
class II histocompatibility antigen, M alpha chain
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 190 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
class II histocompatibility antigen, B-L beta chain
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 103 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
C-type lectin domain family 2 member B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
C-type lectin domain family 2 member B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC100538559 isoform X4
uncharacterized protein LOC100538559 isoform X2
C-type lectin domain family 2 member B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
C-type lectin domain family 2 member B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
C-type lectin domain family 2 member B isoform X3
C-type lectin domain family 2 member B isoform X1
killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily B member 1B allele A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, transcript variant X3
myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, transcript variant X4
myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, transcript variant X2
myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein isoform X1
myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein isoform X3
myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein isoform X2
myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythroid membrane-associated protein isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 211 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC109370405 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC109370405 isoform X1
myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 99 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 91 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein RFP, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA leucine (anticodon AAG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
zinc finger protein RFP, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein RFP, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein RFP, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 222 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor of activated protein C kinase 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transfer RNA valine (anticodon CAC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM39, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 101 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA lysine (anticodon CUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM39, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM39 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM39-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM39-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA leucine (anticodon CAA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon UUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon CUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM7 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM7 isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM7 isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM7 isoform X4
transfer RNA threonine (anticodon UGU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA proline (anticodon UGG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA valine (anticodon AAC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA asparagine (anticodon GUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger protein 436-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 436-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 436-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 217 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM7-like
zinc finger protein 692-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 692-like, transcript variant X1
C-type lectin domain family 2 member F-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X15
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X17
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X30
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X27
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X28
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X33
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X30
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult isoform X15
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X12
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult isoform X14
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X11
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X29
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X28
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X27
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X24
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X25
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X2
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X4
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X5
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X3
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X10
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X9
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X12
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X13
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X7
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X6
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X8
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X11
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X23
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X16
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X19
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X34
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X29
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X26
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X25
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X24
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X22
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X21
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X20
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X37
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X38
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X36
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult, transcript variant X35
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult isoform X20
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult isoform X13
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult isoform X16
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult isoform X9
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X34
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult isoform X10
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X31
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult isoform X4
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X35
uncharacterized protein LOC100540610 isoform X33
uncharacterized protein LOC100540610 isoform X32
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult isoform X26
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X23
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X22
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X3
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X21
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X7
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X5
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult isoform X6
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult isoform X2
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X19
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X18
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X17
selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T-cells protein 6 isoform X8
myosin heavy chain, skeletal muscle, adult isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 158 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 87 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 82 samples with support for all annotated introns
prickle planar cell polarity protein 3-A-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
non-receptor tyrosine-protein kinase TYK2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 129 samples with support for all annotated introns