Gallus gallus isolate bGalGal1 chromosome 35, bGalGal1.mat.broiler.GRCg7b, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Archelosauria; Archosauria; Dinosauria; Saurischia; Theropoda; Coelurosauria; Aves; Neognathae; Galloanserae; Galliformes; Phasianidae; Phasianinae; Gallus.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM028516.1.\nAssembly name: bGalGal1.mat.broiler.GRCg7b\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Vertebrate Genomes Project on\n2021/01/19. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession JAENSK000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Vertebrate Genomes Project\nAssembly Date :: 22-JUL-2020\nAssembly Method :: TrioCanu v. 1.8; purge_dups v. 1.0.0;\n Scaff 10x v. 4.1.0; Bionano solve v.\n 3.2.1_04122018; Salsa2 HiC v. 2.2; Arrow\n polishing and gap filling v.\n SMRTLink7.0.1; Freebayes v. 1.3.1; gEVAL\n manual curation v. 2020-07-22; VGP trio\n assembly pipeline v. 1.6\nAssembly Name :: bGalGal1.mat.broiler.GRCg7b\nDiploid :: Principal pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: No\nGenome Coverage :: 102.01x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel I CLR; Illumina NovaSeq;\n Arima Genomics Hi-C; Bionano Genomics DLS\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Gallus gallus Annotation Release 106\nAnnotation Version :: 106\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 9.0\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
TOX high mobility group box family member 4-like
COORDINATES: polyA evidence [ECO:0006239]
methyltransferase like 3, transcript variant X1
COORDINATES: cap analysis [ECO:0007248] and polyA evidence [ECO:0006239]
N6-adenosine-methyltransferase catalytic subunit isoform X1
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X19
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X10
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X17
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X4
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X2
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X18
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X5
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X12
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X11
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X21
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X7
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X14
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X9
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X16
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X15
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X6
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X20
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X13
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X8
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X3
serine-rich adhesin for platelets-like, transcript variant X1
serine-rich adhesin for platelets isoform X18
putative uncharacterized protein DDB_G0282133 isoform X15
serine-rich adhesin for platelets isoform X6
Ig heavy chain V region 914-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 91 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Ig heavy chain V region 914-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 86 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 129 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-64D-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-64D-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-23-like, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 86 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-23-like isoform X1
immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-64D-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 67 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 1249 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 83 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-74-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 49 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Immunoglobulin heavy chain V-III region VH26-like 1, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC121108127, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121108127, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121108127, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC121108127, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121108127, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC121108127, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC121108127, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121108127, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC121108128, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC121108128, transcript variant X2
proteasome activator subunit 1, transcript variant X2
proteasome activator subunit 1, transcript variant X1
proteasome activator complex subunit 1 isoform X1
proteasome activator complex subunit 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2, mitochondrial; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X6
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X1
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X4
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X3
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X2
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X5
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2, mitochondrial
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_205470.2
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 11 substitutions, 1 frameshift, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase [GTP], mitochondrial isoform X1
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase [GTP], mitochondrial isoform X3
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase [GTP], mitochondrial isoform X2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_990801.2
The RefSeq protein has 4 substitutions, 1 frameshift, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase [GTP], mitochondrial precursor
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase [GTP], mitochondrial isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC112531456, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC112531456, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC112531456, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein LOC112531456 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC112531456 isoform X3
uncharacterized protein LOC112531456 isoform X1
apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer 1, transcript variant X1
apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer in the nucleus isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC100857859, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC100857859, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC100857859, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC100857859, transcript variant X4
proteasome subunit beta 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
proteasome subunit beta 5, transcript variant X1
proteasome subunit beta 5, transcript variant X3
proteasome subunit beta 5, transcript variant X2
proteasome subunit beta 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proteasome subunit beta type-5 isoform X1
matrix metalloproteinase-14-like, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: matrix metalloproteinase-14-like isoform X1
protein arginine methyltransferase 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein arginine methyltransferase 5, transcript variant 7
protein arginine methyltransferase 5, transcript variant 5
protein arginine methyltransferase 5, transcript variant 6
protein arginine methyltransferase 5, transcript variant 4
protein arginine methyltransferase 5, transcript variant 3
protein arginine methyltransferase 5, transcript variant 1
protein arginine methyltransferase 5, transcript variant 2
isoform 7 is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 5 isoform 7
isoform 5 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 5 isoform 5
isoform 6 is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 5 isoform 6
isoform 4 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 5 isoform 4
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 5 isoform 3
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 5 isoform 1
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 5 isoform 2
HAUS augmin-like complex subunit 4, transcript variant X2
HAUS augmin-like complex subunit 4, transcript variant X1
HAUS augmin-like complex subunit 4 isoform X2
HAUS augmin-like complex subunit 4 isoform X1
OXA1L mitochondrial inner membrane protein, transcript variant X4
OXA1L mitochondrial inner membrane protein, transcript variant X2
mitochondrial inner membrane protein OXA1L isoform X4
mitochondrial inner membrane protein OXA1L isoform X2
OXA1L mitochondrial inner membrane protein, transcript variant X3
OXA1L mitochondrial inner membrane protein, transcript variant X1
mitochondrial inner membrane protein OXA1L isoform X3
mitochondrial inner membrane protein OXA1L isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF31-like, transcript variant X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF31 isoform X1
NEDD8 ubiquitin like modifier; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
NEDD8 ubiquitin like modifier, transcript variant X2
NEDD8 ubiquitin like modifier, transcript variant X1
NEDD8 ubiquitin like modifier, transcript variant X4
NEDD8 ubiquitin like modifier, transcript variant X5
NEDD8 ubiquitin like modifier, transcript variant X3
NEDD8 ubiquitin like modifier, transcript variant X10
NEDD8 ubiquitin like modifier, transcript variant X9
NEDD8 ubiquitin like modifier, transcript variant X6
NEDD8 ubiquitin like modifier, transcript variant X8
NEDD8 ubiquitin like modifier, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
REC8 meiotic recombination protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
REC8 meiotic recombination protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
REC8 meiotic recombination protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
REC8 meiotic recombination protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
meiotic recombination protein REC8 homolog isoform X5
meiotic recombination protein REC8 homolog isoform X3
meiotic recombination protein REC8 homolog isoform X2
meiotic recombination protein REC8 homolog isoform X1
REC8 meiotic recombination protein, transcript variant X6
REC8 meiotic recombination protein, transcript variant X7
REC8 meiotic recombination protein, transcript variant X4
meiotic recombination protein REC8 homolog isoform X6
meiotic recombination protein REC8 homolog isoform X7
meiotic recombination protein REC8 homolog isoform X4