Numida meleagris isolate 19003 breed g44 Domestic line chromosome 24, NumMel1.0, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Archelosauria; Archosauria; Dinosauria; Saurischia; Theropoda; Coelurosauria; Aves; Neognathae; Galloanserae; Galliformes; Numididae; Numida.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM007837.2.\nAssembly name: NumMel1.0\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the INRA on 2017/06/01. The\noriginal whole-genome shotgun project has the accession\nMTSP00000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: INRA\nAssembly Date :: JUL-2013\nAssembly Method :: AllPaths v. July-2013\nAssembly Name :: NumMel1.0\nReference-guided Assembly :: Gallus_gallus-5.0 (GCF_000002315.4)\nGenome Coverage :: 100.0x\nSequencing Technology :: Illumina HiSeq\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Version :: Numida meleagris Annotation Release\n 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 7.4\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
SMG5, nonsense mediated mRNA decay factor
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01019475.1
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 223 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 223 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
DDB1 and CUL4 associated factor 8, transcript variant X1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01016836.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 501 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
DDB1 and CUL4 associated factor 8, transcript variant X2
DDB1 and CUL4 associated factor 8, transcript variant X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 482 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
ras GTPase-activating-like protein IQGAP3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01000977.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 379 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 379 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
late endosomal/lysosomal adaptor, MAPK and MTOR activator 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 103 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras-related protein Rab-11A-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras-related protein Rab-11A-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 130 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras-related protein Rab-11A-like isoform X1
ras-related protein Rab-11A-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
feather keratin 2-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
feather keratin 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
feather keratin 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
feather keratin 2-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: feather beta keratin-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
scale keratin-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
scale keratin-like, transcript variant X1
scale keratin-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable pathogenesis-related protein ARB_02861, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
probable pathogenesis-related protein ARB_02861, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable pathogenesis-related protein ARB_02861
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
nescient helix-loop-helix 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
nescient helix-loop-helix 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110387977, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110387977, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110387977, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110387977, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC110387977 isoform X4
uncharacterized protein LOC110387977 isoform X3
uncharacterized protein LOC110387977 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC110387977 isoform X1
SLAM family member 7-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAM family member 7-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAM family member 7-like, transcript variant X8
SLAM family member 7-like, transcript variant X4
SLAM family member 7-like, transcript variant X6
SLAM family member 7-like, transcript variant X3
SLAM family member 7-like, transcript variant X2
SLAM family member 7-like, transcript variant X5
signaling lymphocytic activation molecule-like
SLAM family member 8-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAM family member 8-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAM family member 8-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01028397.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 170 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 82 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SLAM family member 8-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAM family member 8-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAM family member 8-like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
ETS translocation variant 3-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
ETS translocation variant 3-like isoform X1
ETS translocation variant 3-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
ETS translocation variant 3-like isoform X2
ETS translocation variant 3-like protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 11
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01035000.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 61 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 8 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
platelet endothelial aggregation receptor 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: platelet endothelial aggregation receptor 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
high affinity nerve growth factor receptor
insulin receptor related receptor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin receptor related receptor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin receptor-related protein isoform X2
insulin receptor-related protein isoform X1
insulin receptor related receptor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
insulin receptor-related protein isoform X3
death-associated protein kinase 2-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
death-associated protein kinase 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
death-associated protein kinase 2-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
death-associated protein kinase 2-like, transcript variant X5
death-associated protein kinase 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC110387943 isoform X2
death-associated protein kinase 2-like isoform X3
death-associated protein kinase 2-like isoform X1
SH2 domain containing 2A, transcript variant X1
SH2 domain containing 2A, transcript variant X2
SH2 domain-containing protein 2A isoform X1
SH2 domain-containing protein 2A isoform X2
papillary renal cell carcinoma (translocation-associated), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
papillary renal cell carcinoma (translocation-associated), transcript variant X1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01014480.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 170 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 87 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
39S ribosomal protein L24, mitochondrial
ribosomal RNA adenine dimethylase domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal RNA adenine dimethylase domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal RNA adenine dimethylase domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal RNA adenine dimethylase domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal RNA adenine dimethylase domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal RNA adenine dimethylase domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon stimulated exonuclease gene 20 like 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon-stimulated 20 kDa exonuclease-like 2 isoform X2
interferon stimulated exonuclease gene 20 like 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon stimulated exonuclease gene 20 like 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon stimulated exonuclease gene 20 like 2, transcript variant X1
interferon-stimulated 20 kDa exonuclease-like 2 isoform X1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01005525.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 354 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 328 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01034125.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 168 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 60 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
myocyte enhancer factor 2D, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
myocyte enhancer factor 2D, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
myocyte enhancer factor 2D, transcript variant X2
myocyte enhancer factor 2D, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2D isoform X4
myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2D isoform X3
myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2D isoform X2
myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2D isoform X1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01015323.1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01031579.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 1339 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 1339 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01009173.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 271 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 63 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA methionine (anticodon CAU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
interleukin enhancer binding factor 2, transcript variant X3
interleukin enhancer binding factor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin enhancer binding factor 2, transcript variant X2
interleukin enhancer-binding factor 2 isoform X1
interleukin enhancer-binding factor 2 isoform X2
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromatin target of PRMT1, transcript variant X2
chromatin target of PRMT1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromatin target of PRMT1 protein isoform X2
chromatin target of PRMT1 protein isoform X1
chromatin target of PRMT1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromatin target of PRMT1 protein isoform X3
S100 calcium binding protein A1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
S100 calcium binding protein A1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
S100 calcium binding protein A1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
S100 calcium binding protein A1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
S100 calcium binding protein A1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
S100 calcium binding protein A1, transcript variant X6
S100 calcium binding protein A13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
S100 calcium binding protein A13, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
S100 calcium binding protein A14, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
S100 calcium binding protein A14, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01013657.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 33 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 4 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
protein S100-A4-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein S100-A4-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sperm mitochondrial-associated cysteine-rich protein-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
late cornified envelope-like proline-rich protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 6% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
probable peroxisomal membrane protein PEX13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01009420.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 289 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 225 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01001671.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 57 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 6 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
nucleoporin 210 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
nucleoporin 210 like, transcript variant X1
nuclear pore membrane glycoprotein 210-like isoform X2
nuclear pore membrane glycoprotein 210-like isoform X1
nucleoporin 210 like, transcript variant X3
nuclear pore membrane glycoprotein 210-like isoform X3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01021575.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 213 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 213 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 213 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 213 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 213 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 213 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 132 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 213 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 213 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 213 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 213 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 213 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 213 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 24 C1orf189 homolog, transcript variant X2
chromosome 24 C1orf189 homolog, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein C1orf189 homolog isoform X2
uncharacterized protein C1orf189 homolog isoform X1
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X10
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X5
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X7
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X13
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X8
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X11
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X12
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X15
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X1
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X4
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X6
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X9
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X3
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X15
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X2
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X10
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X5
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X7
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X13
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X8
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X11
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X12
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
secretory carrier-associated membrane protein 3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01020609.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 235 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 235 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
hyperpolarization activated cyclic nucleotide gated potassium channel 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
hyperpolarization activated cyclic nucleotide gated potassium channel 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium/sodium hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 3 isoform X1
potassium/sodium hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 3 isoform X2
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01013979.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 640 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 480 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH1 like histone lysine methyltransferase, transcript variant X2
ASH1 like histone lysine methyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH1 like histone lysine methyltransferase, transcript variant X3
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase ASH1L isoform X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase ASH1L isoform X1
death associated protein 3, transcript variant X2
death associated protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
28S ribosomal protein S29, mitochondrial isoform X1
28S ribosomal protein S29, mitochondrial isoform X2
misato 1, mitochondrial distribution and morphology regulator, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
misato 1, mitochondrial distribution and morphology regulator, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
GON-4-like protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
GON-4-like protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ras like without CAAX 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ras like without CAAX 1, transcript variant X2
KIAA0907 ortholog, transcript variant X1
UPF0469 protein KIAA0907 homolog isoform X1
KIAA0907 ortholog, transcript variant X2
KIAA0907 ortholog, transcript variant X3
UPF0469 protein KIAA0907 homolog isoform X2
EF-hand calcium binding domain 12, transcript variant X1
EF-hand calcium binding domain 12, transcript variant X2
EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 12 isoform X2
EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 12 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
golgi phosphoprotein 3 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
golgi phosphoprotein 3 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
induced myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein Mcl-1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
threonyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial (putative)
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01025980.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 168 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 149 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain containing 2, transcript variant X6
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain-containing protein 2 isoform X5
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain-containing protein 2 isoform X6
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
pre-mRNA processing factor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA processing factor 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
U4/U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Prp3 isoform X1
U4/U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Prp3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
28S ribosomal protein S21, mitochondrial
circadian associated repressor of transcription
circadian-associated transcriptional repressor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
aph-1 homolog A, gamma-secretase subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
aph-1 homolog A, gamma-secretase subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110387883, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110387883, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC110387883, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC110387883 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC110387883 isoform X1
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X15
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X13
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X11
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X8
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X17
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X27
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X10
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X26
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X7
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X21
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X6
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X5
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X14
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X16
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X9
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X19
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X29
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X28
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X4
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X3
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X2
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X1
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X30
high affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc receptor I-like isoform X12
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon UCU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01010201.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 913 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 913 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 119 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
atypical chemokine receptor 1 (Duffy blood group)
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01022661.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 168 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01003651.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 230 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 215 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01018334.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 106 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 45
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01008175.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 344 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 344 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 45
V-set and immunoglobulin domain containing 8
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01007688.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 222 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 222 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
V-set and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein 8
succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit C
succinate dehydrogenase cytochrome b560 subunit, mitochondrial
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01006980.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 202 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 67 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 40 like
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01020544.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 187 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 168 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM40B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin-fold modifier conjugating enzyme 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin-fold modifier conjugating enzyme 1, transcript variant X2
ubiquitin-fold modifier-conjugating enzyme 1 isoform X1
ubiquitin-fold modifier-conjugating enzyme 1 isoform X2
ubiquitin specific peptidase 21, transcript variant X1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01010932.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 462 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 314 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 21 isoform X1
ubiquitin specific peptidase 21, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 462 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 21 isoform X2
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 4
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit S2
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01020064.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; added 181 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; added 96 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur protein 2, mitochondrial
high affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc receptor I-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01027613.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 641 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 641 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
translocon-associated protein subunit beta
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X10
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X8
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X7
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X3
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X9
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X11
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X5
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X6
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X1
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X10
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X8
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X7
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X3
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X9
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X11
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X5
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X6
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X4
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X1
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X2
SET domain bifurcated 1, transcript variant X1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01019853.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 800 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain bifurcated 1, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 800 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 744 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB1 isoform X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB1 isoform X2
SET domain bifurcated 1, transcript variant X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 800 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB1 isoform X3
MINDY lysine 48 deubiquitinase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
MINDY lysine 48 deubiquitinase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
MINDY lysine 48 deubiquitinase 1, transcript variant X3
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase MINDY-1 isoform X2
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase MINDY-1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01016578.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 123 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110387878, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC110387878, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110387878, transcript variant X1
GA binding protein transcription factor beta subunit 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
GA binding protein transcription factor beta subunit 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
GA-binding protein subunit beta-2 isoform X1
GA-binding protein subunit beta-2 isoform X2
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01000358.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 235 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 175 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01003886.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; added 55 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; added 34 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: lysM and putative peptidoglycan-binding domain-containing protein 1
sodium channel modifier 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium channel modifier 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 72 homolog
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase type 1 alpha, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase type 1 alpha, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase type 1 alpha, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase type 1 alpha, transcript variant X1
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase type 1 alpha, transcript variant X3
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase type 1 alpha, transcript variant X6
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase type-1 alpha isoform X2
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase type-1 alpha isoform X5
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase type-1 alpha isoform X6
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase type-1 alpha isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase type-1 alpha isoform X3
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase type-1 alpha isoform X4
proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase 4, transcript variant X2
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4 isoform X1
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta, transcript variant X1
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta, transcript variant X2
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta isoform X2
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta isoform X1
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X3
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X4
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X1
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X5
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X6
selenium-binding protein 1-A-like, transcript variant X2
selenium-binding protein 1-A-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
selenium-binding protein 1-like isoform X2
selenium-binding protein 1-A-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
pogo transposable element derived with ZNF domain, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
pogo transposable element derived with ZNF domain, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
pogo transposable element derived with ZNF domain, transcript variant X1
pogo transposable element derived with ZNF domain, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
pogo transposable element with ZNF domain isoform X3
pogo transposable element with ZNF domain isoform X1
pogo transposable element with ZNF domain isoform X2
pogo transposable element derived with ZNF domain, transcript variant X6
pogo transposable element derived with ZNF domain, transcript variant X5
pogo transposable element derived with ZNF domain, transcript variant X7
pogo transposable element with ZNF domain isoform X4
pogo transposable element with ZNF domain isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorting nexin family member 27, transcript variant X1
sorting nexin family member 27, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
CUGBP Elav-like family member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CUGBP Elav-like family member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CUGBP Elav-like family member 3 isoform X2
CUGBP Elav-like family member 3 isoform X1
regulatory subunit of type II PKA R-subunit (RIIa) domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X15
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X14
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X8
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X6
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X4
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X3
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X2
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor and KH domain containing, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor and KH domain-containing protein isoform X4
tudor and KH domain-containing protein isoform X5
tudor and KH domain-containing protein isoform X3
tudor and KH domain-containing protein isoform X2
tudor and KH domain-containing protein isoform X1
RAR related orphan receptor C, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAR related orphan receptor C, transcript variant X4
RAR related orphan receptor C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAR related orphan receptor C, transcript variant X1
acyl-coenzyme A thioesterase THEM4-like, transcript variant X1
acyl-coenzyme A thioesterase THEM4-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
acyl-coenzyme A thioesterase THEM4-like isoform X2
acyl-coenzyme A thioesterase THEM4-like isoform X1
S100 calcium binding protein A10, transcript variant X5
S100 calcium binding protein A10, transcript variant X4
S100 calcium binding protein A10, transcript variant X3
S100 calcium binding protein A10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
S100 calcium binding protein A10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
death effector domain-containing protein
V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit A-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit A-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit A-like, transcript variant X3
V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit A-like isoform X1
V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit A-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns