Numida meleagris isolate 19003 breed g44 Domestic line chromosome 20, NumMel1.0, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Archelosauria; Archosauria; Dinosauria; Saurischia; Theropoda; Coelurosauria; Aves; Neognathae; Galloanserae; Galliformes; Numididae; Numida.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM007833.1.\nAssembly name: NumMel1.0\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the INRA on 2017/06/01. The\noriginal whole-genome shotgun project has the accession\nMTSP00000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: INRA\nAssembly Date :: JUL-2013\nAssembly Method :: AllPaths v. July-2013\nAssembly Name :: NumMel1.0\nReference-guided Assembly :: Gallus_gallus-5.0 (GCF_000002315.4)\nGenome Coverage :: 100.0x\nSequencing Technology :: Illumina HiSeq\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Version :: Numida meleagris Annotation Release\n 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 7.4\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobin superfamily member 21, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobin superfamily member 21, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobin superfamily member 21, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobin superfamily member 21, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobin superfamily member 21, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin superfamily member 21 isoform X3
immunoglobulin superfamily member 21 isoform X2
immunoglobulin superfamily member 21 isoform X1
immunoglobulin superfamily member 21 isoform X4
immunoglobulin superfamily member 21 isoform X5
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X2
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X1
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X7
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X5
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X8
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein isoform X8
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein isoform X6
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein isoform X5
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein isoform X4
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein isoform X2
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein isoform X3
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein isoform X1
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein isoform X7
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein isoform X9
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein isoform X11
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein isoform X12
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein isoform X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein-arginine deiminase type-3-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein-arginine deiminase type-3-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein-arginine deiminase type-1-like isoform X2
protein-arginine deiminase type-1-like isoform X1
protein-arginine deiminase type-3-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein-arginine deiminase type-3-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein-arginine deiminase type-1-like isoform X3
protein-arginine deiminase type-3-like isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
succinate dehydrogenase complex iron sulfur subunit B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur subunit, mitochondrial
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S16, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S16, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
28S ribosomal protein S16, mitochondrial
solute carrier family 45 member 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 1, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 45 member 1, transcript variant X7
solute carrier family 45 member 1, transcript variant X8
solute carrier family 45 member 1, transcript variant X9
solute carrier family 45 member 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
proton-associated sugar transporter A isoform X3
proton-associated sugar transporter A isoform X1
proton-associated sugar transporter A isoform X2
ERBB receptor feedback inhibitor 1, transcript variant X1
ERBB receptor feedback inhibitor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
period circadian clock 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
period circadian clock 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
period circadian clock 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
period circadian clock 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
period circadian clock 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
period circadian protein homolog 3 isoform X3
period circadian protein homolog 3 isoform X2
period circadian protein homolog 3 isoform X1
period circadian protein homolog 3 isoform X4
period circadian protein homolog 3 isoform X5
period circadian clock 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
period circadian clock 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calmodulin binding transcription activator 1, transcript variant X3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01012100.1
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 364 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
calmodulin binding transcription activator 1, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 364 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
calmodulin binding transcription activator 1, transcript variant X4
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 364 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
calmodulin binding transcription activator 1, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 364 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 283 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
calmodulin-binding transcription activator 1 isoform X3
calmodulin-binding transcription activator 1 isoform X2
calmodulin-binding transcription activator 1 isoform X4
calmodulin-binding transcription activator 1 isoform X1
calmodulin binding transcription activator 1, transcript variant X7
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 364 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
calmodulin binding transcription activator 1, transcript variant X5
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 364 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
calmodulin binding transcription activator 1, transcript variant X6
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 364 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
calmodulin-binding transcription activator 1 isoform X7
calmodulin-binding transcription activator 1 isoform X5
calmodulin-binding transcription activator 1 isoform X6
uncharacterized LOC110408565, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408565, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
dnaJ homolog subfamily C member 11 isoform X1
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
dnaJ homolog subfamily C member 11 isoform X2
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01008244.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 69 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 39 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
kelch like family member 21, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 21, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 21, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 48, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 48, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology and RhoGEF domain containing G5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology and RhoGEF domain containing G5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family G member 5 isoform X2
pleckstrin homology and RhoGEF domain containing G5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology and RhoGEF domain containing G5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family G member 5 isoform X3
pleckstrin homology and RhoGEF domain containing G5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family G member 5 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01014135.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 100 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 53 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
cytosolic acyl coenzyme A thioester hydrolase
G protein-coupled receptor 153, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 153, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoprenylcysteine carboxyl methyltransferase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein-S-isoprenylcysteine O-methyltransferase
ring finger protein 207, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 207, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 207, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 5, transcript variant X3
chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding protein 5 isoform X1
chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding protein 5 isoform X3
chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding protein 5 isoform X2
chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 5, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding protein 5 isoform X4
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A regulatory beta subunit 2
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01025054.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 16 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
voltage-gated potassium channel subunit beta-2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC110386998, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110386998, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110408760, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110408760, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC110408760, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC110408760, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC110408760, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110408760, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC110408760, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110386978, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110386978, transcript variant X2
chromosome 20 C1orf174 homolog, transcript variant X1
chromosome 20 C1orf174 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
UPF0688 protein C1orf174 homolog isoform X1
UPF0688 protein C1orf174 homolog isoform X2
DNA fragmentation factor subunit beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA fragmentation factor subunit beta, transcript variant X2
DNA fragmentation factor subunit beta isoform X1
DNA fragmentation factor subunit beta isoform X2
centrosomal protein 104, transcript variant X2
centrosomal protein 104, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 104, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein of 104 kDa isoform X1
centrosomal protein of 104 kDa isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 47
coiled-coil domain containing 27, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 27, transcript variant X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 27 isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 27 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC110386962, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110386962, transcript variant X1
tumor protein p73, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p73, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p73, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tumor protein p73, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p73, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110386963, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110386963, transcript variant X1
WD repeat containing, antisense to TP73, transcript variant X1
WD repeat containing, antisense to TP73, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat-containing protein WRAP73 isoform X1
WD repeat-containing protein WRAP73 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor protein p63-regulated gene 1-like protein
multiple EGF like domains 6, transcript variant X2
multiple EGF like domains 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
multiple EGF like domains 6, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
multiple EGF like domains 6, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein 6 isoform X1
multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein 6 isoform X3
multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein 6 isoform X4
multiple EGF like domains 6, transcript variant X4
multiple EGF like domains 6, transcript variant X3
multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein 6 isoform X2
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 16, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 16, transcript variant X2
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 16, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 16 isoform X1
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 16 isoform X2
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 16 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
PR/SET domain 16, transcript variant X10
PR/SET domain 16, transcript variant X12
PR/SET domain 16, transcript variant X11
PR domain zinc finger protein 16 isoform X4
PR domain zinc finger protein 16 isoform X3
PR domain zinc finger protein 16 isoform X2
PR domain zinc finger protein 16 isoform X1
PR domain zinc finger protein 16 isoform X5
PR domain zinc finger protein 16 isoform X7
PR domain zinc finger protein 16 isoform X8
PR domain zinc finger protein 16 isoform X6
proline-rich receptor-like protein kinase PERK5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 672 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 693 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 34, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 34, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane metalloendopeptidase like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane metalloendopeptidase like 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane metalloendopeptidase like 1, transcript variant X1
membrane metallo-endopeptidase-like 1 isoform X1
membrane metallo-endopeptidase-like 1 isoform X3
membrane metallo-endopeptidase-like 1 isoform X2
transcription factor HES-5-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor HES-5-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor HES-5-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pantothenate kinase 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
pantothenate kinase 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
pantothenate kinase 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable glutamate receptor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable glutamate receptor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable glutamate receptor, transcript variant X2
probable glutamate receptor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase C eta 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase C eta 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase C eta 2, transcript variant X2
phospholipase C eta 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase C eta 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase C eta 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase C eta 2, transcript variant X6
phospholipase C eta 2, transcript variant X7
phospholipase C eta 2, transcript variant X9
phospholipase C eta 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase C eta 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase eta-2 isoform X3
1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase eta-2 isoform X2
1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase eta-2 isoform X1
1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase eta-2 isoform X4
1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase eta-2 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
retention in endoplasmic reticulum sorting receptor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
retention in endoplasmic reticulum sorting receptor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
retention in endoplasmic reticulum sorting receptor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
retention in endoplasmic reticulum sorting receptor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408659, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC110408659, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC110408659, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC110408659, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110408659, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110408659, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC110408659, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC110408659, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC110408659, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC110408659, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC110408659, transcript variant X6
SKI proto-oncogene, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI proto-oncogene, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI proto-oncogene, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408661, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110408661, transcript variant X1
Fanconi anemia core complex associated protein 20, transcript variant X2
Fanconi anemia core complex associated protein 20, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fanconi anemia core complex associated protein 20, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fanconi anemia core complex-associated protein 20
protein kinase C zeta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C zeta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C zeta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 74, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 74 isoform X8
gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor delta subunit, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor delta subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor delta subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor delta subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit delta isoform X2
gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit delta isoform X1
gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit delta isoform X3
gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor delta subunit, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit delta isoform X4
cilia and flagella associated protein 74, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 74, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 74, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 74, transcript variant X2
cilia and flagella associated protein 74, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 74, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 74, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 74 isoform X1
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 74 isoform X3
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 74 isoform X5
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 74 isoform X2
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 74 isoform X4
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 74 isoform X6
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 74 isoform X7
uncharacterized LOC110408660, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110408660, transcript variant X1
G protein subunit beta 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 74 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein subunit beta 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 74 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein subunit beta 1, transcript variant X5
G protein subunit beta 1, transcript variant X7
G protein subunit beta 1, transcript variant X1
G protein subunit beta 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 74 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein subunit beta 1, transcript variant X4
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(T) subunit beta-1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member E2B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member E2B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member E2B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member E2B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 35 member E2B, transcript variant X2
cyclin-dependent kinase 11B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin-dependent kinase 11B, transcript variant X4
cyclin-dependent kinase 11B, transcript variant X3
cyclin-dependent kinase 11B, transcript variant X2
cyclin-dependent kinase 11B, transcript variant X6
cyclin-dependent kinase 11B, transcript variant X5
cyclin-dependent kinase 11B, transcript variant X7
cyclin-dependent kinase 11B, transcript variant X8
cyclin-dependent kinase 11B, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin-dependent kinase 11B, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408489, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408489, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
matrix metallopeptidase 23B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
matrix metallopeptidase 23B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
matrix metallopeptidase 23B, transcript variant X5
matrix metallopeptidase 23B, transcript variant X3
matrix metallopeptidase 23B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
matrix metallopeptidase 23B, transcript variant X9
matrix metallopeptidase 23B, transcript variant X8
matrix metallopeptidase 23B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
matrix metallopeptidase 23B, transcript variant X2
mindbomb E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
mindbomb E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408491, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408491, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Golgi integral membrane protein 4-like, transcript variant X1
Golgi integral membrane protein 4-like isoform X1
Golgi integral membrane protein 4-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Golgi integral membrane protein 4-like isoform X2
fibronectin type III domain containing 10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibronectin type III domain-containing protein 10
SSU72 homolog, RNA polymerase II CTD phosphatase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA polymerase II subunit A C-terminal domain phosphatase SSU72
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01032254.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 65 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 57 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
ATPase family, AAA domain containing 3A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 3A
ATPase family, AAA domain containing 3A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408612, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408612, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110408612, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408612, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC110408611, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408611, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC110408611, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408611, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC110408611, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC110408611, transcript variant X2
39S ribosomal protein L20, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
aurora kinase A interacting protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
aurora kinase A interacting protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
aurora kinase A interacting protein 1, transcript variant X1
aurora kinase A interacting protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
matrix remodeling associated 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
matrix remodeling associated 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
matrix remodeling associated 8, transcript variant X1
matrix remodeling-associated protein 8 isoform X1
matrix remodeling-associated protein 8 isoform X2
dishevelled segment polarity protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
dishevelled segment polarity protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
segment polarity protein dishevelled homolog DVL-1 isoform X1
segment polarity protein dishevelled homolog DVL-1 isoform X2
dishevelled segment polarity protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
segment polarity protein dishevelled homolog DVL-1 isoform X3
taste 1 receptor member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
taste 1 receptor member 3, transcript variant X2
taste receptor type 1 member 3 isoform X1
taste receptor type 1 member 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
ArfGAP with coiled-coil, ankyrin repeat and PH domains 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
arf-GAP with coiled-coil, ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 3
sodium channel epithelial 1 delta subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
amiloride-sensitive sodium channel subunit delta
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 J2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 J2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
C1q and TNF related 12, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
C1q and TNF related 12, transcript variant X1
C1q and TNF related 12, transcript variant X3
beta-1,3-galactosyltransferase 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-galactosyltransferase 6, transcript variant X2
beta-1,3-galactosyltransferase 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
stromal cell derived factor 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
45 kDa calcium-binding protein isoform X1
stromal cell derived factor 4, transcript variant X2
45 kDa calcium-binding protein isoform X2
TNF receptor superfamily member 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor superfamily member 4, transcript variant X2
TNF receptor superfamily member 4, transcript variant X3
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 4 isoform X1
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 4 isoform X2
TNF receptor superfamily member 18, transcript variant X1
TNF receptor superfamily member 18, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: inactive polyglycylase TTLL10
uncharacterized LOC110408708, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110408708, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408708, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408708, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC110408708, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC110408708, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC110408708, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC110408708, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408708, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110408708, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC110408708, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC110408708, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X19
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X21
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X17
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X16
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X20
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC110408532, transcript variant X18
chromosome 20 C1orf159 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 20 C1orf159 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 20 C1orf159 homolog, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 20 C1orf159 homolog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 20 C1orf159 homolog, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 20 C1orf159 homolog, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C1orf159 homolog isoform X1
uncharacterized protein C1orf159 homolog isoform X2
ring finger protein 223, transcript variant X2
ring finger protein 223, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 11-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
hes family bHLH transcription factor 4, transcript variant X1
hes family bHLH transcription factor 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
PPARGC1 and ESRR induced regulator, muscle 1
PGC-1 and ERR-induced regulator in muscle protein 1
pleckstrin homology domain containing N1
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family N member 1
kelch like family member 17, transcript variant X2
kelch like family member 17, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
NOC2 like nucleolar associated transcriptional repressor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
NOC2 like nucleolar associated transcriptional repressor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
sterile alpha motif domain containing 11, transcript variant X1
sterile alpha motif domain containing 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
sterile alpha motif domain-containing protein 11 isoform X1
sterile alpha motif domain-containing protein 11 isoform X2
arginine-glutamic acid dipeptide repeats, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine-glutamic acid dipeptide repeats, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine-glutamic acid dipeptide repeats, transcript variant X1
arginine-glutamic acid dipeptide repeats, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
arginine-glutamic acid dipeptide repeats, transcript variant X2
arginine-glutamic acid dipeptide repeats, transcript variant X6
arginine-glutamic acid dipeptide repeats protein isoform X3
arginine-glutamic acid dipeptide repeats protein isoform X2
arginine-glutamic acid dipeptide repeats protein isoform X1
arginine-glutamic acid dipeptide repeats protein isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 5-like
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X1
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X9
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X18
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X8
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X10
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X19
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X17
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X15
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X6
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X11
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X3
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X2
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X4
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X12
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X7
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X14
G protein-coupled receptor 157, transcript variant X5
hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase/glucose 1-dehydrogenase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase/glucose 1-dehydrogenase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase/glucose 1-dehydrogenase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
GDH/6PGL endoplasmic bifunctional protein
splA/ryanodine receptor domain and SOCS box containing 1, transcript variant X1
splA/ryanodine receptor domain and SOCS box containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
splA/ryanodine receptor domain and SOCS box containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
SPRY domain-containing SOCS box protein 1
solute carrier family 25 member 33, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 25 member 33, transcript variant X1
solute carrier family 25 member 33 isoform X1
solute carrier family 25 member 33, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 25 member 33 isoform X2
transmembrane protein 201, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 201, transcript variant X4
transmembrane protein 201, transcript variant X5
transmembrane protein 201, transcript variant X6
transmembrane protein 201, transcript variant X1
transmembrane protein 201, transcript variant X2
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta, transcript variant X8
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta, transcript variant X5
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta, transcript variant X3
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta isoform
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
catenin beta interacting protein 1, transcript variant X2
catenin beta interacting protein 1, transcript variant X1
leucine zipper and CTNNBIP1 domain containing, transcript variant X5
leucine zipper and CTNNBIP1 domain containing, transcript variant X3
leucine zipper and CTNNBIP1 domain containing, transcript variant X7
leucine zipper and CTNNBIP1 domain containing, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine zipper and CTNNBIP1 domain containing, transcript variant X4
leucine zipper and CTNNBIP1 domain containing, transcript variant X2
leucine zipper and CTNNBIP1 domain containing, transcript variant X1
nicotinamide nucleotide adenylyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
nicotinamide nucleotide adenylyltransferase 1, transcript variant X4
nicotinamide nucleotide adenylyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
nicotinamide nucleotide adenylyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
nicotinamide/nicotinic acid mononucleotide adenylyltransferase 1 isoform X1
nicotinamide/nicotinic acid mononucleotide adenylyltransferase 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitination factor E4B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ubiquitination factor E4B, transcript variant X1
ubiquitin conjugation factor E4 B isoform X2
ubiquitin conjugation factor E4 B isoform X1
kinesin family member 1B, transcript variant X6
kinesin family member 1B, transcript variant X7
kinesin family member 1B, transcript variant X2
kinesin family member 1B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 1B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member 1B, transcript variant X3
kinesin family member 1B, transcript variant X5
6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, decarboxylating
castor zinc finger 1, transcript variant X7
castor zinc finger 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
castor zinc finger 1, transcript variant X3
castor zinc finger 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
castor zinc finger 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
castor zinc finger 1, transcript variant X2
castor zinc finger 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein castor homolog 1 isoform X5
zinc finger protein castor homolog 1 isoform X3
zinc finger protein castor homolog 1 isoform X2
zinc finger protein castor homolog 1 isoform X1
zinc finger protein castor homolog 1 isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC110408616, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110408616, transcript variant X2
mannan binding lectin serine peptidase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mannan-binding lectin serine protease 2 isoform X2
mannan binding lectin serine peptidase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mannan binding lectin serine peptidase 2, transcript variant X1
mannan-binding lectin serine protease 2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
mechanistic target of rapamycin, transcript variant X1
mechanistic target of rapamycin, transcript variant X2
angiopoietin like 7, transcript variant X1
angiopoietin like 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
angiopoietin-related protein 7 isoform X1
angiopoietin-related protein 7 isoform X2
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like, transcript variant X3
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like, transcript variant X6
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like, transcript variant X8
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like isoform X1
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like isoform X2
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like isoform X3
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like isoform X6
ubiA prenyltransferase domain-containing protein 1-like isoform X7
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like, transcript variant X4
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like, transcript variant X5
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like isoform X4
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 2-like isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 82, transcript variant X3
transmembrane protein 82, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 82, transcript variant X1
filamin binding LIM protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
filamin binding LIM protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
filamin binding LIM protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110408595, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110408595, transcript variant X1
spen family transcriptional repressor, transcript variant X1
spen family transcriptional repressor, transcript variant X2
spen family transcriptional repressor, transcript variant X3
spen family transcriptional repressor, transcript variant X4
spen family transcriptional repressor, transcript variant X5
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 17, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 17, transcript variant X4
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 17, transcript variant X1
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 17, transcript variant X2
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 17, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 17 isoform X2
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 17 isoform X1
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 17 isoform X4
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 17, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 17 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock protein family B (small) member 7
chloride voltage-gated channel Ka, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride voltage-gated channel Ka, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride voltage-gated channel Ka, transcript variant X2
chloride channel protein ClC-Ka isoform X1
chloride channel protein ClC-Ka isoform X2
chloride channel protein ClC-Ka isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 86 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01001655.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 278 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 278 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
SUZ RNA binding domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
SUZ RNA binding domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
SUZ RNA binding domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
SUZ RNA binding domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
SUZ domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
SUZ domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
SUZ domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
SUZ domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
SUZ RNA binding domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
SUZ RNA binding domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
SUZ domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
SUZ domain-containing protein 1 isoform X6
adaptin ear-binding coat-associated protein 2
ciliary rootlet coiled-coil, rootletin, transcript variant X3
ciliary rootlet coiled-coil, rootletin, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ciliary rootlet coiled-coil, rootletin, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ciliary rootlet coiled-coil, rootletin, transcript variant X8
ciliary rootlet coiled-coil, rootletin, transcript variant X4
ciliary rootlet coiled-coil, rootletin, transcript variant X5
ciliary rootlet coiled-coil, rootletin, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
ciliary rootlet coiled-coil, rootletin, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
cation-transporting ATPase 13A2 isoform X3
cation-transporting ATPase 13A2 isoform X2
cation-transporting ATPase 13A2 isoform X1
cation-transporting ATPase 13A2 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
aldehyde dehydrogenase 4 family member A1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
delta-1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial
ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component n-recognin 4, transcript variant X5
ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component n-recognin 4, transcript variant X4
ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component n-recognin 4, transcript variant X3
ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component n-recognin 4, transcript variant X2
ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component n-recognin 4, transcript variant X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UBR4 isoform X5
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UBR4 isoform X4
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UBR4 isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UBR4 isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UBR4 isoform X1
MRT4 homolog, ribosome maturation factor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
aflatoxin B1 aldehyde reductase member 2
PQ loop repeat containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
PQ loop repeat containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
PQ loop repeat containing 2, transcript variant X3
PQ loop repeat containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysosomal amino acid transporter 1 homolog isoform X1
lysosomal amino acid transporter 1 homolog isoform X2
lysosomal amino acid transporter 1 homolog isoform X3
lysosomal amino acid transporter 1 homolog isoform X4
capping actin protein of muscle Z-line beta subunit, transcript variant X2
capping actin protein of muscle Z-line beta subunit, transcript variant X1
F-actin-capping protein subunit beta isoform X2
F-actin-capping protein subunit beta isoform X1
neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1, transcript variant X1
neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1, transcript variant X7
neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1, transcript variant X2
neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1 isoform X1
neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1 isoform X2
neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1, transcript variant X4
neuroblastoma suppressor of tumorigenicity 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 4, transcript variant X1
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 4, transcript variant X5
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 4, transcript variant X4
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 4, transcript variant X6
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 4 isoform X4
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 4, transcript variant X7
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 4 isoform X5
OTU deubiquitinase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
OTU domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
OTU deubiquitinase 3, transcript variant X1
OTU domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
group IIE secretory phospholipase A2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
phospholipase A2, membrane associated-like
UBX domain protein 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain protein 10, transcript variant X2
ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX19B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX19B, transcript variant X1
ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX19B isoform X2
ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX19B isoform X1
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 5B1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 5B1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 5B1
mitochondrial E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1
mitochondrial ubiquitin ligase activator of NFKB 1
family with sequence similarity 43 member B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
serine/threonine-protein kinase PINK1, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
EF-hand domain family member D2, transcript variant X1
EF-hand domain family member D2, transcript variant X2
EF-hand domain-containing protein D2 isoform X1
EF-hand domain-containing protein D2 isoform X2
forkhead associated phosphopeptide binding domain 1, transcript variant X1
forkhead associated phosphopeptide binding domain 1, transcript variant X2
forkhead associated phosphopeptide binding domain 1, transcript variant X3
forkhead associated phosphopeptide binding domain 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
forkhead-associated domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
forkhead-associated domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
forkhead-associated domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
forkhead-associated domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
forkhead associated phosphopeptide binding domain 1, transcript variant X5
transmembrane protein 51, transcript variant X1
transmembrane protein 51, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 51, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 51, transcript variant X3
transmembrane protein 51, transcript variant X2
transmembrane protein 51, transcript variant X4
kazrin, periplakin interacting protein, transcript variant X2
kazrin, periplakin interacting protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
kazrin, periplakin interacting protein, transcript variant X4
kazrin, periplakin interacting protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
PR domain zinc finger protein 2 isoform X1
PR domain zinc finger protein 2 isoform X3
PR domain zinc finger protein 2 isoform X4
PR domain zinc finger protein 2 isoform X2
leucine rich repeat containing 38, transcript variant X5
leucine rich repeat containing 38, transcript variant X6
leucine rich repeat containing 38, transcript variant X4
leucine rich repeat containing 38, transcript variant X2
leucine rich repeat containing 38, transcript variant X3
leucine rich repeat containing 38, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 38 isoform X2
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 38 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein C1orf158 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
dehydrogenase/reductase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrogenase/reductase 3, transcript variant X1
dehydrogenase/reductase 3, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC110387014, transcript variant X10
vacuolar protein sorting 13 homolog D, transcript variant X1
vacuolar protein sorting 13 homolog D, transcript variant X2
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 13D isoform X2
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 13D isoform X1
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1B
TNF receptor superfamily member 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor superfamily member 8, transcript variant X2
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 8 isoform X1
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 8 isoform X2
migration and invasion inhibitory protein
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: migration and invasion-inhibitory protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
procollagen-lysine,2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 1
uncharacterized protein KIAA2013 homolog
chymotrypsin-like elastase family member 2A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
atrial natriuretic peptide receptor 1-like, transcript variant X1
atrial natriuretic peptide receptor 1-like, transcript variant X2
atrial natriuretic peptide receptor 1-like isoform X1
atrial natriuretic peptide receptor 1-like isoform X2
chloride voltage-gated channel 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chloride voltage-gated channel 6, transcript variant X1
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase isoform X1
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, transcript variant X2
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase isoform X2
chromosome 20 C1orf167 homolog, transcript variant X2
chromosome 20 C1orf167 homolog, transcript variant X3
chromosome 20 C1orf167 homolog, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein C1orf167 homolog isoform X2
uncharacterized protein C1orf167 homolog isoform X1
chromosome 20 C1orf167 homolog, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized protein C1orf167 homolog isoform X3
angiotensin II receptor associated protein, transcript variant X4
angiotensin II receptor associated protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
angiotensin II receptor associated protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
type-1 angiotensin II receptor-associated protein isoform X3
type-1 angiotensin II receptor-associated protein isoform X1
type-1 angiotensin II receptor-associated protein isoform X4
angiotensin II receptor associated protein, transcript variant X2
type-1 angiotensin II receptor-associated protein isoform X2
dorsal inhibitory axon guidance protein, transcript variant X2
dorsal inhibitory axon guidance protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitotic arrest deficient 2 like 2, transcript variant X2
mitotic arrest deficient 2 like 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD2B
F-box only protein 6-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
F-box only protein 6-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
F-box only protein 6-like, transcript variant X3
dispatched RND transporter family member 3, transcript variant X5
dispatched RND transporter family member 3, transcript variant X3
dispatched RND transporter family member 3, transcript variant X9
dispatched RND transporter family member 3, transcript variant X1
dispatched RND transporter family member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
dispatched RND transporter family member 3, transcript variant X6
dispatched RND transporter family member 3, transcript variant X4
dispatched RND transporter family member 3, transcript variant X7
dispatched RND transporter family member 3, transcript variant X8
dispatched RND transporter family member 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
dispatched RND transporter family member 3, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110386965, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110386965, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC110386965, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110386965, transcript variant X3
complement C1q B chain, transcript variant X2
complement C1q B chain, transcript variant X1
complement C1q A chain, transcript variant X2
complement C1q A chain, transcript variant X1
complement C1q subcomponent subunit A isoform X1
complement C1q subcomponent subunit A isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 Proteins, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X2
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X10
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X9
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X3
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X5
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X1
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X13
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X11
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X8
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X4
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X7
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X6
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X18
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 40 isoform X2
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 40 isoform X4
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 40 isoform X5
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 40 isoform X3
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 40 isoform X1
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 40 isoform X7
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X14
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X16
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X17
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 40, transcript variant X15
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 40 isoform X6
uncharacterized LOC110408567, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC110408567, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC110408567, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110408567, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 73 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell division cycle 42, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell division cycle 42, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell division control protein 42 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Y-box binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Y-box binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
nuclease-sensitive element-binding protein 1 isoform X2
nuclease-sensitive element-binding protein 1 isoform X1
peptidylprolyl isomerase H, transcript variant X2
peptidylprolyl isomerase H, transcript variant X1
coiled-coil domain containing 30, transcript variant X2
coiled-coil domain containing 30, transcript variant X5
coiled-coil domain containing 30, transcript variant X4
coiled-coil domain containing 30, transcript variant X3
coiled-coil domain containing 30, transcript variant X1
coiled-coil domain containing 30, transcript variant X12
coiled-coil domain containing 30, transcript variant X11
coiled-coil domain containing 30, transcript variant X8
coiled-coil domain containing 30, transcript variant X9
coiled-coil domain containing 30, transcript variant X6
coiled-coil domain containing 30, transcript variant X7
coiled-coil domain containing 30, transcript variant X10
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 30 isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 30 isoform X5
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 30 isoform X4
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 30 isoform X3
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 30 isoform X1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 30 isoform X7
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 30 isoform X6
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 30 isoform X8
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 30 isoform X10
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 30 isoform X9
phosphopantothenoylcysteine synthetase, transcript variant X1
phosphopantothenoylcysteine synthetase, transcript variant X3
phosphopantothenoylcysteine synthetase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphopantothenate--cysteine ligase isoform X1
phosphopantothenate--cysteine ligase isoform X2
zinc finger MYND-type containing 12, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger MYND-type containing 12, transcript variant X1
zinc finger MYND domain-containing protein 12
solute carrier family 2 member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 1 isoform X1
solute carrier family 2 member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 1 isoform X2
solute carrier family 2 member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
erythroblast membrane associated protein (Scianna blood group)
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 269, transcript variant X1
transmembrane protein 269, transcript variant X4
transmembrane protein 269, transcript variant X3
transmembrane protein 269, transcript variant X2
chymotrypsin like elastase family member 3B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
chymotrypsin-like elastase family member 3B
basement membrane-specific heparan sulfate proteoglycan core protein-like
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01003058.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 269 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 269 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 48, transcript variant X2
ubiquitin specific peptidase 48, transcript variant X3
ubiquitin specific peptidase 48, transcript variant X1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 48 isoform X1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 48 isoform X2
ubiquitin specific peptidase 48, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 48 isoform X3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GBYG01019733.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 674 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 501 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
alkaline phosphatase, tissue-nonspecific isozyme
endothelin converting enzyme 1, transcript variant X3
endothelin-converting enzyme 1 isoform X3
endothelin converting enzyme 1, transcript variant X4
endothelin converting enzyme 1, transcript variant X2
endothelin-converting enzyme 1 isoform X2
endothelin converting enzyme 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
endothelin-converting enzyme 1 isoform X1
endothelin-converting enzyme 1 isoform X4
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3, transcript variant X11
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3, transcript variant X9
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3, transcript variant X10
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3, transcript variant X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3, transcript variant X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3, transcript variant X3
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3, transcript variant X7
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3 isoform X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3 isoform X5
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3 isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3 isoform X4
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3 isoform X6
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3 isoform X7
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3 isoform X3
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3 isoform X9
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3 isoform X8
heterochromatin protein 1 binding protein 3, transcript variant X1
heterochromatin protein 1 binding protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
heterochromatin protein 1-binding protein 3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: SH2 domain-containing protein 5
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: kinesin-like protein KIF17
dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide--protein glycosyltransferase non-catalytic subunit
dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide--protein glycosyltransferase 48 kDa subunit
protein DDI1 homolog 2, transcript variant X2
protein DDI1 homolog 2, transcript variant X1
regulatory solute carrier protein family 1 member 1 isoform X1