Oxyura jamaicensis isolate SHBP4307 breed ruddy duck chromosome 17, BPBGC_Ojam_1.0, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Archelosauria; Archosauria; Dinosauria; Saurischia; Theropoda; Coelurosauria; Aves; Neognathae; Galloanserae; Anseriformes; Anatidae; Anatinae; Oxyura.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM021815.1.\nAssembly name: BPBGC_Ojam_1.0\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Brood Parasitic Bird Genomes\nConsortium on 2020/03/10. The original whole-genome shotgun project\nhas the accession JAACYN000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Brood Parasitic Bird Genomes Consortium\nAssembly Date :: 01-SEP-2019\nAssembly Method :: Supernova 2 v. SEPT-2019\nAssembly Name :: BPBGC_Ojam_1.0\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 60.0x\nSequencing Technology :: Illumina NovaSeq\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Oxyura jamaicensis Annotation\n Release 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.4\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2-like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2-like isoform X2
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
dipeptidyl peptidase 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
dipeptidyl peptidase 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
dipeptidyl peptidase 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannosidase alpha class 1B member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannosidase alpha class 1B member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannosidase alpha class 1B member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannosidase alpha class 1B member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
endoplasmic reticulum mannosyl-oligosaccharide 1,2-alpha-mannosidase isoform X3
endoplasmic reticulum mannosyl-oligosaccharide 1,2-alpha-mannosidase isoform X2
endoplasmic reticulum mannosyl-oligosaccharide 1,2-alpha-mannosidase isoform X4
endoplasmic reticulum mannosyl-oligosaccharide 1,2-alpha-mannosidase isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor APC domain-containing protein 2
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 2 isoform X1
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 2 isoform X2
transmembrane protein 141, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 141, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 141, transcript variant X3
PAXX non-homologous end joining factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAXX non-homologous end joining factor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAXX non-homologous end joining factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAXX non-homologous end joining factor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chloride intracellular channel protein 3
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X8
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X2
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X3
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X4
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X6
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X5
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X1
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X7
fucosyltransferase 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
fucosyltransferase 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
POU domain, class 5, transcription factor 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
endothelial differentiation related factor 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
endothelial differentiation-related factor 1
TNF receptor associated factor 2, transcript variant X1
TNF receptor associated factor 2, transcript variant X2
TNF receptor-associated factor 2 isoform X2
TNF receptor-associated factor 2 isoform X1
apical endosomal glycoprotein-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
apical endosomal glycoprotein-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
apical endosomal glycoprotein-like isoform X1
apical endosomal glycoprotein-like isoform X2
phosphohistidine phosphatase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphohistidine phosphatase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
14 kDa phosphohistidine phosphatase isoform X2
14 kDa phosphohistidine phosphatase isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
RAB, member RAS oncogene family like 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB, member RAS oncogene family like 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB, member RAS oncogene family like 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB, member RAS oncogene family like 6, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
notch-regulated ankyrin repeat-containing protein
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X10
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8-like isoform X1
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8-like isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADPH-dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1 isoform X1
NADPH-dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1 isoform X2
ring finger protein 208, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 208, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 208, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 26
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X8
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X12
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X9
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X10
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X8
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X5
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X4
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X1
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X7
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X2
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X6
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X3
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X1
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X8
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X7
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X6
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X2
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA threonine (anticodon AGU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X1
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X3
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X2
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X4
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X6
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X5
DNA polymerase epsilon 3, accessory subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
U4/U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Prp4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
anaphase-promoting complex subunit CDC26
solute carrier family 31 member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 31 member 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 31 member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 31 member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 31 member 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 31 member 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 31 member 1, transcript variant X6
solute carrier family 31 member 1, transcript variant X3
FKBP prolyl isomerase 15, transcript variant X1
FKBP prolyl isomerase 15, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase 15, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase 15, transcript variant X2
FKBP prolyl isomerase 15, transcript variant X5
leucine rich repeat and sterile alpha motif containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat and sterile alpha motif containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat and sterile alpha motif containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase LRSAM1 isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase LRSAM1 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase LRSAM1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00302
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger MYND domain-containing protein 19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
39S ribosomal protein L41, mitochondrial
patatin like phospholipase domain containing 7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 7
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X2
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X5
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X6
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X3
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X1
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X5
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X3
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X6
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X4
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X7
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1-like, transcript variant X3
Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1-like isoform X2
Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1-like isoform X1
Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1-like isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like isoform X1
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like isoform X2
family with sequence similarity 166 member A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 197 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
negative elongation factor complex member B
uncharacterized LOC118175415, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118175415, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamine synthetase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamine synthetase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamine synthetase, transcript variant X3
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X7
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X4
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X8
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X3
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X6
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X5
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X2
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X1
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X5
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X8
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X6
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X9
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X10
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X12
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B isoform X1
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B isoform X6
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B isoform X2
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B isoform X3
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B isoform X4
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B isoform X7
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B isoform X5
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B isoform X8
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B isoform X10
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B isoform X12
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B isoform X9
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B isoform X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 31 member 2, transcript variant X3
probable low affinity copper uptake protein 2 isoform X3
solute carrier family 31 member 2, transcript variant X4
solute carrier family 31 member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 31 member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable low affinity copper uptake protein 2 isoform X1
probable low affinity copper uptake protein 2 isoform X2
probable low affinity copper uptake protein 2 isoform X4
niban apoptosis regulator 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
niban apoptosis regulator 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
niban apoptosis regulator 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
ATPase H+ transporting V1 subunit G1, transcript variant X2
ATPase H+ transporting V1 subunit G1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
V-type proton ATPase subunit G 1 isoform X1
V-type proton ATPase subunit G 1 isoform X2
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X2
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X1
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X4
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF superfamily member 15, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF superfamily member 15, transcript variant X2
TNF superfamily member 15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 15
TNF superfamily member 8, transcript variant X2
TNF superfamily member 8, transcript variant X4
TNF superfamily member 8, transcript variant X3
TNF superfamily member 8, transcript variant X1
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118175258, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118175258, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 32, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 32, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM32 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM32 isoform X2
CMP-N-acetylneuraminate-beta-galactosamide- alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 4-like
toll like receptor 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
toll like receptor 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
toll like receptor 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
toll like receptor 4, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118175572, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118175572, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118175572, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC118175572, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC118175572, transcript variant X4
BMP/retinoic acid inducible neural specific 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
BMP/retinoic acid-inducible neural-specific protein 1
CDK5 regulatory subunit associated protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDK5 regulatory subunit associated protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDK5 regulatory subunit associated protein 2, transcript variant X3
CDK5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 2 isoform X2
CDK5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 2 isoform X1
CDK5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 2 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein 9
uncharacterized LOC118175413, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118175413, transcript variant X2
collagen type XXVII alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type XXVII alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type XXVII alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type XXVII alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen alpha-1(XXVII) chain isoform X1
collagen alpha-1(XXVII) chain isoform X2
collagen alpha-1(XXVII) chain isoform X3
solute carrier family 25 member 25, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25 member 25, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25 member 25, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein SCaMC-2 isoform X2
calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein SCaMC-2 isoform X1
solute carrier family 25 member 25, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25 member 25, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein SCaMC-2 isoform X4
calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein SCaMC-2 isoform X3
solute carrier family 25 member 25, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein SCaMC-2 isoform X6
calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein SCaMC-2 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 102 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 102 member A, transcript variant X2
family with sequence similarity 102 member A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase subunit 2, regulatory
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
dolichol phosphate-mannose biosynthesis regulatory protein
SH2 domain containing 3C, transcript variant X1
SH2 domain containing 3C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain-containing protein 3C isoform X1
SH2 domain containing 3C, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain-containing protein 3C isoform X2
SH2 domain containing 3C, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain-containing protein 3C isoform X3
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 16, transcript variant X2
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 16, transcript variant X1
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 16 isoform X2
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 16 isoform X1
cerebral endothelial cell adhesion molecule, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cerebral endothelial cell adhesion molecule, transcript variant X3
cerebral endothelial cell adhesion molecule, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
inactive glycosyltransferase 25 family member 3 isoform X1
inactive glycosyltransferase 25 family member 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
long-chain fatty acid transport protein 4
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon UCU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquinone biosynthesis protein COQ4 homolog, mitochondrial
TruB pseudouridine synthase family member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
TruB pseudouridine synthase family member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial mRNA pseudouridine synthase TRUB2 isoform X1
mitochondrial mRNA pseudouridine synthase TRUB2 isoform X2
SWI5 homologous recombination repair protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X5
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X3
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X2
cip1-interacting zinc finger protein isoform X1
cip1-interacting zinc finger protein isoform X2
cip1-interacting zinc finger protein isoform X3
cip1-interacting zinc finger protein isoform X5
cip1-interacting zinc finger protein isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 2, transcript variant X1
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 2, transcript variant X2
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X6
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X1
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X4
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X6
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X2
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X5
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X3
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X8
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X9
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118175497, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118175497, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
SPOUT domain containing methyltransferase 1
putative methyltransferase C9orf114 homolog
kynurenine aminotransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
kynurenine aminotransferase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
kynurenine aminotransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
kynurenine aminotransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
kynurenine aminotransferase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
kynurenine--oxoglutarate transaminase 1 isoform X1
kynurenine--oxoglutarate transaminase 1 isoform X2
leucine rich repeat containing 8 VRAC subunit A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat containing 8 VRAC subunit A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
volume-regulated anion channel subunit LRRC8A
phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X4
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
dolichyldiphosphatase 1, transcript variant X1
dolichyldiphosphatase 1, transcript variant X2
carnitine O-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
carnitine O-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
carnitine O-acetyltransferase isoform X1
carnitine O-acetyltransferase isoform X2
protein phosphatase 2 phosphatase activator, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 2 phosphatase activator, transcript variant X3
protein phosphatase 2 phosphatase activator, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A activator isoform X3
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A activator isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A activator isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
N-terminal Xaa-Pro-Lys N-methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-terminal Xaa-Pro-Lys N-methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-terminal Xaa-Pro-Lys N-methyltransferase 1
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
paired related homeobox 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
paired related homeobox 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
paired mesoderm homeobox protein 2 isoform X2
paired mesoderm homeobox protein 2 isoform X1
prostaglandin E synthase, transcript variant X2
prostaglandin E synthase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 20, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 20, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 20
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X17
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X23
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X19
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X18
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X16
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X5
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X15
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X22
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 4 bases in 3 codons; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
argininosuccinate synthase 1, transcript variant X3
argininosuccinate synthase 1, transcript variant X2
argininosuccinate synthase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
far upstream element binding protein 3, transcript variant X1
far upstream element binding protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
far upstream element binding protein 3, transcript variant X2
far upstream element binding protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
far upstream element-binding protein 3 isoform X1
far upstream element-binding protein 3 isoform X4
far upstream element-binding protein 3 isoform X2
far upstream element-binding protein 3 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABL proto-oncogene 1, non-receptor tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABL proto-oncogene 1, non-receptor tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABL proto-oncogene 1, non-receptor tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibrinogen C domain-containing protein 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: laminin subunit gamma-3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear pore complex protein Nup214 isoform X1
nuclear pore complex protein Nup214 isoform X2
nuclear pore complex protein Nup214 isoform X3
family with sequence similarity 78 member A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 7 (inactive), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 7 (inactive), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X3
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X5
protein O-mannosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
protein O-mannosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X4
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X6
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X2
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X4
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X9
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X8
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X7
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X6
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X2
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X5
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X1
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X3
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription termination factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription termination factor 1, transcript variant X2
cilia and flagella associated protein 77
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 77
uncharacterized LOC118175448, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC118175448, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118175448, transcript variant X2
DEAD-box helicase 31, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
DEAD-box helicase 31, transcript variant X3
DEAD-box helicase 31, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
DEAD-box helicase 31, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX31 isoform X4
probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX31 isoform X3
probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX31 isoform X2
probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX31 isoform X1
general transcription factor IIIC subunit 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIIC subunit 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor 3C polypeptide 4 isoform X1
general transcription factor 3C polypeptide 4 isoform X2
adenylate kinase 8, transcript variant X3
adenylate kinase 8, transcript variant X4
adenylate kinase 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenylate kinase 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
sperm acrosome associated 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
sperm acrosome associated 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
sperm acrosome-associated protein 9 isoform X2
sperm acrosome-associated protein 9 isoform X1
TSC complex subunit 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
TSC complex subunit 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
TSC complex subunit 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118175479, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118175479, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC118175479, transcript variant X3
growth factor independent 1B transcriptional repressor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIIC subunit 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
general transcription factor 3C polypeptide 5
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X2
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X2
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X3
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X1
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 (FORS blood group), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 (FORS blood group), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 (FORS blood group), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 isoform X1
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 isoform X2
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 isoform X3
coiled-coil domain containing 180, transcript variant X2
coiled-coil domain containing 180, transcript variant X1
coiled-coil domain containing 180, transcript variant X3
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 180 isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 180 isoform X1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 180 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00069
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00049
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X8
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X1
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X2
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X5
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X6
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X7
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X3
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X4
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X8
REX4 homolog, 3'-5' exonuclease, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
REX4 homolog, 3'-5' exonuclease, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
REX4 homolog, 3'-5' exonuclease, transcript variant X2
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 13, transcript variant X3
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 13, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 13, transcript variant X1
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 13, transcript variant X2
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 13 isoform X1
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 13 isoform X3
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 13 isoform X4
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 13 isoform X2
calcium channel flower domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium channel flower domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium channel flower homolog isoform X1
calcium channel flower homolog isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 163 member B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: sarcosine dehydrogenase, mitochondrial
vav guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2, transcript variant X2
vav guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2, transcript variant X3
vav guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2, transcript variant X1
vav guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2, transcript variant X4
vav guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2, transcript variant X5
vav guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2, transcript variant X6
guanine nucleotide exchange factor VAV2 isoform X6
guanine nucleotide exchange factor VAV2 isoform X4
guanine nucleotide exchange factor VAV2 isoform X2
guanine nucleotide exchange factor VAV2 isoform X3
guanine nucleotide exchange factor VAV2 isoform X5
guanine nucleotide exchange factor VAV2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 3, transcript variant X3
bromodomain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
bromodomain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
bromodomain containing 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00619
ly6/PLAUR domain-containing protein 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118175614, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118175614, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC118175614, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: retinoic acid receptor RXR-alpha
collagen type V alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X2
collagen type V alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118175462, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118175462, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 26, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 26, transcript variant X2
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00560
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase beta
EGF like domain multiple 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
EGF like domain multiple 7, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1
SEC16 homolog A, endoplasmic reticulum export factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC16 homolog A, endoplasmic reticulum export factor, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC16 homolog A, endoplasmic reticulum export factor, transcript variant X4
SEC16 homolog A, endoplasmic reticulum export factor, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC16 homolog A, endoplasmic reticulum export factor, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC16 homolog A, endoplasmic reticulum export factor, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC16 homolog A, endoplasmic reticulum export factor, transcript variant X3
SEC16 homolog A, endoplasmic reticulum export factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein transport protein Sec16A isoform X1
protein transport protein Sec16A isoform X3
protein transport protein Sec16A isoform X2
protein transport protein Sec16A isoform X4
protein transport protein Sec16A isoform X5
protein transport protein Sec16A isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase type IV
peptidase, mitochondrial processing subunit alpha
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: mitochondrial-processing peptidase subunit alpha
endosome associated trafficking regulator 1
endosome-associated-trafficking regulator 1
small nuclear RNA activating complex polypeptide 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
snRNA-activating protein complex subunit 4
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X1
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X3
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X2
caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 isoform X1
caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 isoform X2
caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 isoform X3
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X6
caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X6
G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X10
G-protein-signaling modulator 1 isoform X2
G-protein-signaling modulator 1 isoform X3
G-protein-signaling modulator 1 isoform X1
G-protein-signaling modulator 1 isoform X4
G-protein-signaling modulator 1 isoform X5
G-protein-signaling modulator 1 isoform X6
G-protein-signaling modulator 1 isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 187
transmembrane protein 250, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 250, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
NACC family member 2, transcript variant X3
NACC family member 2, transcript variant X5
NACC family member 2, transcript variant X4
NACC family member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
NACC family member 2, transcript variant X2
UBA domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
UBA domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBA domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
ubiquitin-associated domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
ubiquitin-associated domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
calmodulin regulated spectrin associated protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
calmodulin regulated spectrin associated protein 1, transcript variant X1
calmodulin-regulated spectrin-associated protein 1 isoform X2
calmodulin-regulated spectrin-associated protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X2
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X4
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X3
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X5
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X1
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X6
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X8
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X9
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X7
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X11
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X2
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X4
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X3
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X5
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X1
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X6
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X8
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X9
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X10
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X7
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X11
putative UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase LOC100288842
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
PHD finger protein 19, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
PHD finger protein 19, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor associated factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor associated factor 1, transcript variant X3
TNF receptor associated factor 1, transcript variant X2
TNF receptor-associated factor 1 isoform X1
TNF receptor-associated factor 1 isoform X2
RAB14, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB14, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118175559, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC118175559, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118175559, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte band 7 integral membrane protein
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X5
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X4
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X4
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X1
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X5
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X3
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X2
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X6
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
carboxyl-terminal PDZ ligand of neuronal nitric oxide synthase protein-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
carboxyl-terminal PDZ ligand of neuronal nitric oxide synthase protein-like, transcript variant X2
carboxyl-terminal PDZ ligand of neuronal nitric oxide synthase protein-like
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit A8
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 8
MORN repeat containing 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
MORN repeat containing 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
MORN repeat containing 5, transcript variant X2
MORN repeat-containing protein 5 isoform X1
MORN repeat-containing protein 5 isoform X3
MORN repeat-containing protein 5 isoform X2
ring finger and CCCH-type domains 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger and CCCH-type domains 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger and CCCH-type domains 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger and CCCH-type domains 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00579
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 6
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 26, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 26, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 26, transcript variant X3
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 26
RAB GTPase activating protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB GTPase activating protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
rab GTPase-activating protein 1 isoform X1
rab GTPase-activating protein 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X14
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X12
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X13
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X11
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X10
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X9
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X8
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatid perinuclear RNA-binding protein isoform X5
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X3
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X4
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X2
spermatid perinuclear RNA-binding protein isoform X2
spermatid perinuclear RNA-binding protein isoform X1
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X6
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatid perinuclear RNA-binding protein isoform X4
spermatid perinuclear RNA-binding protein isoform X3
crumbs cell polarity complex component 2, transcript variant X3
crumbs cell polarity complex component 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
crumbs cell polarity complex component 2, transcript variant X2
crumbs cell polarity complex component 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
crumbs cell polarity complex component 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X5
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X2
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X6
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X5
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X3
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X2
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X4
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X1
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X6
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor D2, transcript variant X4
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor D2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor D2, transcript variant X2
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor D2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor D2, transcript variant X5
adhesion G-protein coupled receptor D2 isoform X4
adhesion G-protein coupled receptor D2 isoform X2
adhesion G-protein coupled receptor D2 isoform X3
adhesion G-protein coupled receptor D2 isoform X1
nuclear receptor subfamily 5 group A member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 5 group A member 1, transcript variant X1
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1 isoform X3
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1 isoform X2
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1 isoform X1
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1 isoform X4
suppressor of cancer cell invasion, transcript variant X5
suppressor of cancer cell invasion, transcript variant X6
suppressor of cancer cell invasion, transcript variant X4
suppressor of cancer cell invasion, transcript variant X2
suppressor of cancer cell invasion, transcript variant X3
suppressor of cancer cell invasion, transcript variant X1
actin related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5 like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5-like protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 catalytic subunit
Rab9 effector protein with kelch motifs, transcript variant X1
Rab9 effector protein with kelch motifs, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
rab9 effector protein with kelch motifs isoform X1
rab9 effector protein with kelch motifs isoform X2
heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTPase activating protein and VPS9 domains 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTPase activating protein and VPS9 domains 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTPase activating protein and VPS9 domains 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTPase activating protein and VPS9 domains 1, transcript variant X5
GTPase activating protein and VPS9 domains 1, transcript variant X6
GTPase activating protein and VPS9 domains 1, transcript variant X7
GTPase activating protein and VPS9 domains 1, transcript variant X2
GTPase-activating protein and VPS9 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
GTPase-activating protein and VPS9 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
GTPase-activating protein and VPS9 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
GTPase-activating protein and VPS9 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
GTPase-activating protein and VPS9 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
GTPase-activating protein and VPS9 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
MAPK associated protein 1, transcript variant X3
MAPK associated protein 1, transcript variant X1
MAPK associated protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
target of rapamycin complex 2 subunit MAPKAP1 isoform X2
target of rapamycin complex 2 subunit MAPKAP1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 3
multivesicular body subunit 12B, transcript variant X2
multivesicular body subunit 12B isoform X2
multivesicular body subunit 12B, transcript variant X3
multivesicular body subunit 12B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
multivesicular body subunit 12B, transcript variant X1
multivesicular body subunit 12B isoform X1
multivesicular body subunit 12B isoform X3
LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 beta, transcript variant X1
LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 beta, transcript variant X3
LIM homeobox transcription factor 1-beta
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 43
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 43
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 34, transcript variant X1
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 34, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 34
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X11
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X10
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X8
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X6
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X4
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor RalGPS1 isoform X4
ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor RalGPS1 isoform X2
ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor RalGPS1 isoform X1
ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor RalGPS1 isoform X5
ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor RalGPS1 isoform X3
angiopoietin like 2, transcript variant X2
angiopoietin like 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 2 isoform X1
F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 2 isoform X2
solute carrier family 2 member 8, transcript variant X1
solute carrier family 2 member 8, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 8 isoform X1
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 8 isoform X2
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X1
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X5
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X3
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X14
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X11
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X4
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X10
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X13
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X15
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X9
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X7
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X11
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X4
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X2
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X13
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X10
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X7
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X3
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X9
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X12
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X14
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X1
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X8
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X6
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC118175530, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC118175530, transcript variant X1