Cygnus olor isolate bCygOlo1 chromosome 24, bCygOlo1.pri.v2, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Archelosauria; Archosauria; Dinosauria; Saurischia; Theropoda; Coelurosauria; Aves; Neognathae; Galloanserae; Anseriformes; Anatidae; Anserinae; Cygnus.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM020088.2.\nAssembly name: bCygOlo1.pri.v2\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Vertebrate Genomes Project on\n2021/03/31. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession WNMI00000000.2.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Vertebrate Genomes Project\nAssembly Date :: 30-NOV-2020\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 2018.31.08-03.06; FALCON-Unzip\n v. 6.0.0.47841; purge_haplotigs v. 1.0.3+\n 1.Nov.2018; scaff10x v. 4.1.0; Bionano\n solve v. 3.2.1_04122018; Salsa HiC v.\n 2.2; Arrow smrtanalysis Pacbio polishing\n & gap filling v. 6.0.0.47841; longranger\n align v. 2.2.2; freebayes Illumina\n polishing v. 1.3.1; gEVAL manual curation\n v. 2020-11-30; VGP assembly pipeline\n individual v. 1.5\nAssembly Name :: bCygOlo1.pri.v2\nDiploid :: Principal pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: No\nGenome Coverage :: 60.23x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel 1 CLR; Illumina NovaSeq;\n Arima Genomics Hi-C; Bionano Genomics DLS\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Cygnus olor Annotation Release 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.6\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X34
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X23
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X18
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X15
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X17
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X21
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X19
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X40
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X22
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X20
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X31
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X32
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X29
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X26
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X24
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X45
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X41
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X48
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X49
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X30
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X44
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X25
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X39
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X47
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X35
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X42
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X33
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X36
nerve growth factor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
nerve growth factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
nerve growth factor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
nerve growth factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X50
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X43
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X46
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X37
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC121059350, transcript variant X28
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 131 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
thyroid stimulating hormone subunit beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
thyroid stimulating hormone subunit beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
thyroid stimulating hormone subunit beta, transcript variant X4
thyroid stimulating hormone subunit beta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
synaptonemal complex protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
synaptonemal complex protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
synaptonemal complex protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
synaptonemal complex protein 1, transcript variant X6
synaptonemal complex protein 1, transcript variant X5
synaptonemal complex protein 1, transcript variant X7
synaptonemal complex protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
synaptonemal complex protein 1, transcript variant X2
synaptonemal complex protein 1 isoform X7
synaptonemal complex protein 1 isoform X5
synaptonemal complex protein 1 isoform X4
synaptonemal complex protein 1 isoform X2
synaptonemal complex protein 1 isoform X3
synaptonemal complex protein 1 isoform X6
synaptonemal complex protein 1 isoform X1
synaptonemal complex protein 1 isoform X8
bile acid receptor-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
bile acid receptor-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of IKBKE 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of IKBKE 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cold shock domain containing E1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 178 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cold shock domain containing E1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 206 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cold shock domain containing E1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3716 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cold shock domain containing E1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 417 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cold shock domain-containing protein E1 isoform X2
cold shock domain-containing protein E1 isoform X4
cold shock domain-containing protein E1 isoform X1
cold shock domain-containing protein E1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 long SRA reads, 50 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine monophosphate deaminase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
adenosine monophosphate deaminase 1, transcript variant X1
DENN domain containing 2C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN domain-containing protein 2C isoform X1
DENN domain containing 2C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN domain-containing protein 2C isoform X2
BCAS2 pre-mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X3
BCAS2 pre-mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
BCAS2 pre-mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA-splicing factor SPF27 isoform X1
pre-mRNA-splicing factor SPF27 isoform X3
pre-mRNA-splicing factor SPF27 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059320, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121059320, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 78 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
homeodomain interacting protein kinase 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: 5' exonuclease Apollo
adaptor related protein complex 4 subunit beta 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: AP-4 complex subunit beta-1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 93 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 84 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 22 isoform X2
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 22 isoform X3
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 22 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative homeodomain transcription factor 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
membrane associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain containing 3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 6 bases in 4 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 6 bases in 4 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: membrane-associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain-containing protein 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and immunoglobulin like domains 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains protein 2
solute carrier family 16 member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 198 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 16 member 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 237 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 16 member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 244 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 16 member 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 197 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 16 member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 198 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 16 member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 202 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
TAFA chemokine like family member 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
TAFA chemokine like family member 3, transcript variant X5
TAFA chemokine like family member 3, transcript variant X4
TAFA chemokine like family member 3, transcript variant X3
TAFA chemokine like family member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
TAFA chemokine like family member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059188, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121059188, transcript variant X1
protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1J, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1J, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1J, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras homolog family member C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras homolog family member C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 53 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppression of tumorigenicity 7 like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppression of tumorigenicity 7 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
capping actin protein of muscle Z-line subunit alpha 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 462 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of tumorigenicity 7 protein-like isoform X2
suppression of tumorigenicity 7 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 80 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
suppressor of tumorigenicity 7 protein-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 45 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059421, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC121059421, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC121059421, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059421, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC121059421, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121059421, transcript variant X1
CTTNBP2 N-terminal like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CTTNBP2 N-terminal like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
CTTNBP2 N-terminal like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
CTTNBP2 N-terminal like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3, transcript variant X3
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3, transcript variant X1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3 isoform X1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3 isoform X2
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 132 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX20
inka box actin regulator 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
inka box actin regulator 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 72 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 871 long SRA reads, 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 long SRA reads, 46 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 long SRA reads, 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 231 long SRA reads, 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 225 long SRA reads, 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 215 long SRA reads, 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 214 long SRA reads, 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 210 long SRA reads, 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 long SRA reads, 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 long SRA reads, 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 28 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 40 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: adenosine receptor A3-like
ATP synthase peripheral stalk-membrane subunit b
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 290 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase F(0) complex subunit B1, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C6orf132 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
putative uncharacterized protein GUCA1ANB isoform X1
putative uncharacterized protein GUCA1ANB isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
guanylate cyclase activator 1B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanylate cyclase activator 1B, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: interferon regulatory factor 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
TRAF3 interacting protein 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF3 interacting protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF3 interacting protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF3 interacting protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF3 interacting protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF3 interacting protein 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF3 interacting protein 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF3-interacting JNK-activating modulator isoform X4
TRAF3-interacting JNK-activating modulator isoform X2
TRAF3-interacting JNK-activating modulator isoform X3
TRAF3-interacting JNK-activating modulator isoform X1
corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1-like, transcript variant X1
corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1-like, transcript variant X2
corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1-like isoform X1
corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 1-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: laminin subunit beta-3
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase IG
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type 1G
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34 isoform X1
hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34 isoform X2
hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34 isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC121059203, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059203, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC121059203 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC121059203, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC121059203 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC121059203, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane cofactor protein-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
membrane cofactor protein-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1014 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement C3b/C4b receptor 1 (Knops blood group)
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 long SRA reads, 37 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 long SRA reads, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 2 isoform X6
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 2 isoform X5
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 2 isoform X4
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 2 isoform X3
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 2 isoform X2
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 181 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 24 C1orf116 homolog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 24 C1orf116 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 24 C1orf116 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
specifically androgen-regulated gene protein isoform X1
specifically androgen-regulated gene protein isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation regulated kinase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation regulated kinase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation regulated kinase 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 3 isoform X2
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 3 isoform X3
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 3 isoform X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2D, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 144 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2D isoform X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2D, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2D isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 381 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras association domain-containing protein 5
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon isoform X2
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon isoform X1
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit epsilon isoform X3
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 73 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 78 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X4
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X3
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X2
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X1
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X13
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X8
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X7
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X6
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 isoform X5
family with sequence similarity 72 member A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
regulator of hemoglobinization and erythroid cell expansion, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
regulator of hemoglobinization and erythroid cell expansion, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of hemoglobinization and erythroid cell expansion, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of hemoglobinization and erythroid cell expansion protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-fatty-acyl-amino acid synthase/hydrolase PM20D1
solute carrier family 41 member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 125 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 41 member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 41 member 1 isoform X1
solute carrier family 41 member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 41 member 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 421 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear casein kinase and cyclin dependent kinase substrate 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear casein kinase and cyclin dependent kinase substrate 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear ubiquitous casein and cyclin-dependent kinase substrate 1 isoform X1
nuclear ubiquitous casein and cyclin-dependent kinase substrate 1 isoform X2
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X7
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X11
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X8
solute carrier family 45 member 3, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Krueppel-like factor 15, transcript variant X1
Krueppel-like factor 15, transcript variant X3
Krueppel-like factor 15, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 4A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 4A
cyclin dependent kinase 18, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase 18, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase 18, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase 18, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059336, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121059336, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC121059336, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC121059336, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC121059336, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC121059336, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC121059336, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA tryptophan (anticodon CCA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
kelch domain containing 8A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch domain containing 8A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch domain containing 8A, transcript variant X6
kelch domain containing 8A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch domain containing 8A, transcript variant X4
kelch domain containing 8A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain family 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain family 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain family 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain family 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain family 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain family 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains protein 2 isoform X1
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains protein 2 isoform X2
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains protein 2 isoform X3
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains protein 2 isoform X4
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains protein 2 isoform X5
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains protein 2 isoform X6
dual serine/threonine and tyrosine protein kinase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
RB binding protein 5, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
RB binding protein 5, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X6
RB binding protein 5, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 67 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
RB binding protein 5, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
RB binding protein 5, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
RB binding protein 5, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 170 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoblastoma-binding protein 5 isoform X6
retinoblastoma-binding protein 5 isoform X1
retinoblastoma-binding protein 5 isoform X2
retinoblastoma-binding protein 5 isoform X3
retinoblastoma-binding protein 5 isoform X4
retinoblastoma-binding protein 5 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 43 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 44 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA lysine (anticodon UUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 beta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 beta, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 beta, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 3-kinase C2 domain-containing subunit beta
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 15B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X2
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X1
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X12
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X1
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X9
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X4
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X6
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X7
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X16
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X19
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X18
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X14
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X5
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X10
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X2
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X8
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X6
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X3
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X7
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X11
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X4
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X14
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A6, transcript variant X21
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 6 isoform X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X3
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRY-box transcription factor 13, transcript variant X1
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 2D-like
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein E isoform X5
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein E isoform X3
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein E isoform X2
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E, transcript variant X4
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein E isoform X4
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein E isoform X1
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X3
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 11A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 11A isoform X4
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 11A isoform X2
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 11A isoform X3
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 11A isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 243 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 76 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X7
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 82 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 75 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X5
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 83 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X8
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X2
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X1
ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 4, transcript variant X18
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X3
plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 4 isoform X4
proline and arginine rich end leucine rich repeat protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 86 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline and arginine rich end leucine rich repeat protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
BRD4-interacting chromatin-remodeling complex-associated protein-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 144 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
primary cilia formation, transcript variant X1
primary cilia formation, transcript variant X3
primary cilia formation, transcript variant X2
primary cilia formation, transcript variant X4
primary cilia formation, transcript variant X5
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 253 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 49, transcript variant X8
ubiquitin specific peptidase 49, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 49, transcript variant X7
ubiquitin specific peptidase 49, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 49, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 49, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 49, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 49, transcript variant X5
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 49 isoform X1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 49 isoform X2
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 6
mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM6 homolog
basic proline-rich protein-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
basic proline-rich protein-like, transcript variant X3
basic proline-rich protein-like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
basic proline-rich protein-like, transcript variant X2
basic proline-rich protein-like, transcript variant X5
basic proline-rich protein-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor EB, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor EB, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor EB, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor EB, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 long SRA reads, 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor EB, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor EB, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
MyoD family inhibitor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
MyoD family inhibitor, transcript variant X1
MyoD family inhibitor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
MyoD family inhibitor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 31 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 22 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 31 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 22 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2-like
uncharacterized LOC121059141, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059141, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC121059141 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC121059141 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine A1 receptor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine A1 receptor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X2
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X5
PTPRF interacting protein alpha 4, transcript variant X4
transmembrane protein 183A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 183A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 183A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like, transcript variant X1
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,6-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
proton-transporting V-type ATPase complex assembly regulator TMEM9
immunoglobulin like and fibronectin type III domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
immunoglobulin-like and fibronectin type III domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
troponin T2, cardiac type, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
troponin T2, cardiac type, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
troponin T2, cardiac type, transcript variant X3
troponin T2, cardiac type, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology like domain family A member 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology-like domain family A member 3
cysteine and glycine rich protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteine and glycine rich protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteine and glycine rich protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteine and glycine rich protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteine and glycine-rich protein 1 isoform X1
cysteine and glycine-rich protein 1 isoform X2
cysteine and glycine-rich protein 1 isoform X3
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X3
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X4
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X2
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X8
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X1
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X2
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X7
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X6
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X10
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X8
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X3
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X4
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X5
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B isoform X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X6
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X4
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X2
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X11
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X9
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X1
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuron navigator 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
arginyl aminopeptidase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginyl aminopeptidase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine zipper like transcription regulator 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 383 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine zipper like transcription regulator 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
leucine-zipper-like transcriptional regulator 1 isoform X1
leucine-zipper-like transcriptional regulator 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 148 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, 27 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 308 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 12, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 12, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch like family member 12, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059109, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein LOC121059109 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC121059109, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC121059109 isoform X2
leucine rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 6, transcript variant X2
leucine rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 6, transcript variant X1
leucine rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 6, transcript variant X3
leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 6 isoform X2
leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 6 isoform X1
leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 6 isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC121059111, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121059111, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC121059111, transcript variant X3
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase V-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase V-like, transcript variant X2
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase V-like isoform X2
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase V-like isoform X1
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase V-like, transcript variant X3
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase V-like isoform X3
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 7
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 8A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 8A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: G-protein coupled receptor 37-like 1
uncharacterized LOC121059313, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121059313, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: kinesin-like protein KIF21B
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 S, transcript variant X2
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 S, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 S, transcript variant X3
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1S isoform X2
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1S isoform X1
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1S isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Pim-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 180 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Pim-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase pim-1 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase pim-1 isoform X2
TBC1 domain family member 22B, transcript variant X5
TBC1 domain family member 22B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 22B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 22B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 22B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 22B isoform X1
TBC1 domain family member 22B isoform X2
TBC1 domain family member 22B isoform X3
TBC1 domain family member 22B isoform X4
TBC1 domain family member 22B isoform X5
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 3, transcript variant X1
bromodomain and PHD finger-containing protein 3 isoform X1
bromodomain and PHD finger-containing protein 3 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC121059215, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121059215, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase 14, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase 14, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 93 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase 14, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 174 long SRA reads, 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase 14, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X3
mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X2
mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X1
mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X4
solute carrier family 26 member 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 26 member 8, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 26 member 8, transcript variant X4
solute carrier family 26 member 8, transcript variant X5
solute carrier family 26 member 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 26 member 8, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRSF protein kinase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 298 long SRA reads, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRSF protein kinase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 long SRA reads, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRSF protein kinase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
SRSF protein kinase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 long SRA reads, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
LHFPL tetraspan subfamily member 5 protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
armadillo repeat containing 12, transcript variant X3
armadillo repeat containing 12, transcript variant X2
armadillo repeat containing 12, transcript variant X1
armadillo repeat-containing protein 12 isoform X1
armadillo repeat-containing protein 12 isoform X3
armadillo repeat-containing protein 12 isoform X2
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 221 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5 isoform X1
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5 isoform X4
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 992 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 190 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 183 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 236 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5 isoform X2
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 183 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X6
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 184 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 186 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase 5, transcript variant X7
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5 isoform X3
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5 isoform X5
TUB like protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TUB like protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
TUB like protein 1, transcript variant X2
TUB like protein 1, transcript variant X3
TUB like protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TEA domain transcription factor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
TEA domain transcription factor 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
TEA domain transcription factor 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
TEA domain transcription factor 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
TEA domain transcription factor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcriptional enhancer factor TEF-5 isoform X1
transcriptional enhancer factor TEF-5 isoform X2
transcriptional enhancer factor TEF-5 isoform X3
transcriptional enhancer factor TEF-5 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 67 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 102 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 95 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor associated 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase makorin-2, transcript variant X1
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase makorin-2, transcript variant X2
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase makorin-2 isoform X2
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase makorin-2 isoform X1
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta isoform X2
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta isoform X1
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 278 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
differentially expressed in FDCP 6 homolog
zinc finger protein 76, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 76, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 62 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 76, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
signal peptide, CUB domain and EGF like domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
signal peptide, CUB domain and EGF like domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
signal peptide, CUB domain and EGF like domain containing 3, transcript variant X5
signal peptide, CUB domain and EGF like domain containing 3, transcript variant X4
signal peptide, CUB domain and EGF like domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 3 isoform X5
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 3 isoform X4
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
signal peptide, CUB domain and EGF like domain containing 3, transcript variant X6
signal peptide, CUB domain and EGF like domain containing 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
signal peptide, CUB domain and EGF like domain containing 3, transcript variant X7
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 3 isoform X8
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 3 isoform X7
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 3 isoform X6
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X5
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1A, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X15
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X14
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X13
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X12
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X11
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X4
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X10
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X9
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X3
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X6
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X18
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X5
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X8
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X2
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X7
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X1
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X16
ankyrin repeat and SAM domain-containing protein 1A isoform X17
uncharacterized LOC121059240, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121059240, transcript variant X1
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein C isoform X2
U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein C isoform X1
inflammation and lipid regulator with UBA-like and NBR1-like domains
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
SAM pointed domain containing ETS transcription factor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SAM pointed domain-containing Ets transcription factor
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 1, transcript variant X3
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nudix hydrolase 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
nudix hydrolase 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
diphosphoinositol polyphosphate phosphohydrolase 1 isoform X2
nudix hydrolase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
nudix hydrolase 3, transcript variant X2
diphosphoinositol polyphosphate phosphohydrolase 1 isoform X1
high mobility group AT-hook 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group AT-hook 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group AT-hook 1, transcript variant X3
high mobility group AT-hook 1, transcript variant X2
high mobility group protein HMG-I/HMG-Y isoform X2
high mobility group protein HMG-I/HMG-Y isoform X1
glutamate metabotropic receptor 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 isoform X1
metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 isoform X2
glutamate metabotropic receptor 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 4, transcript variant X5
metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 isoform X4
glutamate metabotropic receptor 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC121059254, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC121059254, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquinol-cytochrome-c reductase complex assembly factor 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 3 isoform X2
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 3 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC121059262, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121059262, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein LOC121059262 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC121059262 isoform X1
BCL2 antagonist/killer 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 134 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer isoform X3
BCL2 antagonist/killer 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
BCL2 antagonist/killer 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
BCL2 antagonist/killer 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer isoform X1
bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer isoform X2
translocator protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
translocator protein 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
translocator protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
translocator protein 2, transcript variant X4
translocator protein 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
O-acyl-ADP-ribose deacylase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 107 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
O-acyl-ADP-ribose deacylase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 109 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
O-acyl-ADP-ribose deacylase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 167 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
O-acyl-ADP-ribose deacylase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 110 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
O-acyl-ADP-ribose deacylase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 110 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
O-acyl-ADP-ribose deacylase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 106 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribose glycohydrolase OARD1 isoform X3
ADP-ribose glycohydrolase OARD1 isoform X2
ADP-ribose glycohydrolase OARD1 isoform X1
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 67 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X12
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X1
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X5
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X11
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X15
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X3
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X7
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X13
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X17
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X2
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X6
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X12
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X16
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X4
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X8
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X14
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X18
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X9
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X10
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X20
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha isoform X19
choline/ethanolamine phosphotransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
choline/ethanolamine phosphotransferase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
choline/ethanolamine phosphotransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 134 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
choline/ethanolamine phosphotransferase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
choline/ethanolamine phosphotransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
choline/ethanolamine phosphotransferase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
choline/ethanolaminephosphotransferase 1 isoform X1
choline/ethanolaminephosphotransferase 1 isoform X2
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon UUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
DNA damage regulated autophagy modulator 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA damage regulated autophagy modulator 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA damage regulated autophagy modulator 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA damage regulated autophagy modulator 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA damage regulated autophagy modulator 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA damage regulated autophagy modulator 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA damage regulated autophagy modulator 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA damage-regulated autophagy modulator protein 2
ligand dependent nuclear receptor interacting factor 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ligand-dependent nuclear receptor-interacting factor 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 T, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 T, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 17A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit Tim17-A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
myb-related transcription factor, partner of profilin-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
innate immunity activator, transcript variant X2
innate immunity activator, transcript variant X1
innate immunity activator, transcript variant X3
innate immunity activator protein isoform X3
innate immunity activator protein isoform X2
innate immunity activator protein isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01268
endosome-lysosome associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
endosome/lysosome-associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1 isoform X3
endosome-lysosome associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1, transcript variant X3
endosome-lysosome associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
endosome/lysosome-associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1 isoform X2
endosome-lysosome associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
endosome/lysosome-associated apoptosis and autophagy regulator 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 62 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 2
proline and serine rich coiled-coil 1, transcript variant X2
proline and serine rich coiled-coil 1, transcript variant X1
proline/serine-rich coiled-coil protein 1 isoform X2
proline/serine-rich coiled-coil protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase-like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ataxin-7-like protein 2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: amphoterin-induced protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 275 long SRA reads, 54 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) subunit alpha-3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(t) subunit alpha-2
adenosine monophosphate deaminase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
adenosine monophosphate deaminase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine monophosphate deaminase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenosine monophosphate deaminase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 242 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
epidermal growth factor receptor kinase substrate 8-like protein 3
colony stimulating factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 isoform X1
macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase-like protein 1
striatin interacting protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 95 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
striatin-interacting protein 1 isoform X2
striatin interacting protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
striatin-interacting protein 1 isoform X1
striatin interacting protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
striatin-interacting protein 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 6 member 17, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 6 member 17, transcript variant X1
solute carrier family 6 member 17, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 6 member 17, transcript variant X3
sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter SLC6A17 isoform X1
solute carrier family 6 member 17, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter SLC6A17 isoform X2
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily C member 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily C member 4 isoform X1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily C member 4 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
solute carrier family 16 member 4, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 16 member 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
monocarboxylate transporter 5 isoform X2
monocarboxylate transporter 5 isoform X1
late endosomal/lysosomal adaptor, MAPK and MTOR activator 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 Proteins, and 17% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X3
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X5
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
patatin like phospholipase domain containing 1
ETS variant transcription factor 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ETS variant transcription factor 7, transcript variant X6
ETS variant transcription factor 7, transcript variant X5
ETS variant transcription factor 7, transcript variant X4
ETS variant transcription factor 7, transcript variant X3
ETS variant transcription factor 7, transcript variant X1
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD20 isoform X2
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD20 isoform X3
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD20 isoform X1
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 20, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD20 isoform X4
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD20 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1088 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine rich splicing factor 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 74 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 202 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 74 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A, transcript variant X4
cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB44, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB44, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB44, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB44, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 24 C6orf89 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 24 C6orf89 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 92 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
bombesin receptor-activated protein C6orf89 homolog isoform X1
bombesin receptor-activated protein C6orf89 homolog isoform X2
peptidase inhibitor 16, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
peptidase inhibitor 16, transcript variant X2
peptidase inhibitor 16, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC121059411, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121059411, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
mitochondrial carrier 1, transcript variant X2
mitochondrial carrier 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial carrier 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial carrier homolog 1 isoform X2
mitochondrial carrier homolog 1 isoform X3
mitochondrial carrier homolog 1 isoform X1
mitochondrial carrier 1, transcript variant X4
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain containing 2, transcript variant X7
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain containing 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X5