Cygnus olor isolate bCygOlo1 chromosome 23, bCygOlo1.pri.v2, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Archelosauria; Archosauria; Dinosauria; Saurischia; Theropoda; Coelurosauria; Aves; Neognathae; Galloanserae; Anseriformes; Anatidae; Anserinae; Cygnus.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM020087.2.\nAssembly name: bCygOlo1.pri.v2\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Vertebrate Genomes Project on\n2021/03/31. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession WNMI00000000.2.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Vertebrate Genomes Project\nAssembly Date :: 30-NOV-2020\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 2018.31.08-03.06; FALCON-Unzip\n v. 6.0.0.47841; purge_haplotigs v. 1.0.3+\n 1.Nov.2018; scaff10x v. 4.1.0; Bionano\n solve v. 3.2.1_04122018; Salsa HiC v.\n 2.2; Arrow smrtanalysis Pacbio polishing\n & gap filling v. 6.0.0.47841; longranger\n align v. 2.2.2; freebayes Illumina\n polishing v. 1.3.1; gEVAL manual curation\n v. 2020-11-30; VGP assembly pipeline\n individual v. 1.5\nAssembly Name :: bCygOlo1.pri.v2\nDiploid :: Principal pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: No\nGenome Coverage :: 60.23x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel 1 CLR; Illumina NovaSeq;\n Arima Genomics Hi-C; Bionano Genomics DLS\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Cygnus olor Annotation Release 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.6\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 115 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 804 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 115 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 126 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannosidase alpha class 1C member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannosidase alpha class 1C member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannosyl-oligosaccharide 1,2-alpha-mannosidase IC
low density lipoprotein receptor adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 105 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
low density lipoprotein receptor adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
low density lipoprotein receptor adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
low density lipoprotein receptor adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
low density lipoprotein receptor adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
low density lipoprotein receptor adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
low density lipoprotein receptor adapter protein 1 isoform X2
low density lipoprotein receptor adapter protein 1 isoform X1
low density lipoprotein receptor adapter protein 1 isoform X4
low density lipoprotein receptor adapter protein 1 isoform X3
low density lipoprotein receptor adapter protein 1 isoform X6
low density lipoprotein receptor adapter protein 1 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 93 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 50A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 50A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 50A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 50A, transcript variant X2
transmembrane protein 50A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 50A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine and serine rich protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine and serine rich protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine and serine rich protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine and serine rich protein 1, transcript variant X6
arginine and serine rich protein 1, transcript variant X4
arginine/serine-rich protein 1 isoform X1
arginine/serine-rich protein 1 isoform X3
arginine/serine-rich protein 1 isoform X4
arginine and serine rich protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine and serine rich protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine/serine-rich protein 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
RUNX family transcription factor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RUNX family transcription factor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
runt-related transcription factor 3 isoform X1
runt-related transcription factor 3 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC121058810, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121058810, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC121058810, transcript variant X3
chloride intracellular channel 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 251 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel 4, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 long SRA reads, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel 4, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel 4, transcript variant X6
chloride intracellular channel 4, transcript variant X7
chloride intracellular channel 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 long SRA reads, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel protein 4 isoform X2
chloride intracellular channel protein 4 isoform X1
chloride intracellular channel protein 4 isoform X3
chloride intracellular channel protein 4 isoform X4
serine and arginine repetitive matrix 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 122 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine repetitive matrix 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 73 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine repetitive matrix 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 86 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine repetitive matrix 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 163 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine repetitive matrix 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 68 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine repetitive matrix 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 503 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine repetitive matrix 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine repetitive matrix 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine repetitive matrix 1, transcript variant X7
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 1 isoform X6
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 1 isoform X3
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 1 isoform X5
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 1 isoform X2
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 1 isoform X4
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 1 isoform X1
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 1 isoform X7
non-compact myelin associated protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
non-compact myelin associated protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
non-compact myelin associated protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
non-compact myelin associated protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
non-compact myelin associated protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RCAN family member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCAN family member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIPA like domain containing 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIPA like domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 74 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIPA like domain containing 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 75 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIPA like domain containing 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIPA like domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 74 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIPA like domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIPA like domain containing 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIPA like domain containing 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: O(6)-methylguanine-induced apoptosis 2
grainyhead like transcription factor 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
grainyhead like transcription factor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
grainyhead like transcription factor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
grainyhead-like protein 3 homolog isoform X1
grainyhead-like protein 3 homolog isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine rich splicing factor 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine rich splicing factor 10, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 103 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine rich splicing factor 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 136 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine rich splicing factor 10, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine rich splicing factor 10, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine rich splicing factor 10, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 10 isoform X3
serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 10 isoform X5
serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 10 isoform X4
serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 10 isoform X6
serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 10 isoform X1
serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 10 isoform X2
proline rich nuclear receptor coactivator 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline-rich nuclear receptor coactivator 2
cannabinoid receptor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
cannabinoid receptor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 85 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
PITH domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA lyase, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
PITH domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 186 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 3-like, transcript variant X2
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 3-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 3-like isoform X2
sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 3-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 72 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclase associated actin cytoskeleton regulatory protein 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: adenylyl cyclase-associated protein 1
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 2A
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 12 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: sodium-dependent lysophosphatidylcholine symporter 1
MYCL proto-oncogene, bHLH transcription factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
MYCL proto-oncogene, bHLH transcription factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA isopentenyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA isopentenyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA isopentenyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA dimethylallyltransferase isoform X1
tRNA dimethylallyltransferase isoform X2
tRNA dimethylallyltransferase isoform X3
CYFIP-related Rac1 interactor A-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CYFIP-related Rac1 interactor A-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CYFIP-related Rac1 interactor A-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
CYFIP-related Rac1 interactor A-like, transcript variant X1
CYFIP-related Rac1 interactor A-like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
CYFIP-related Rac1 interactor A-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
CYFIP-related Rac1 interactor A-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
CYFIP-related Rac1 interactor A-like isoform X1
CYFIP-related Rac1 interactor A-like isoform X4
CYFIP-related Rac1 interactor A-like isoform X2
CYFIP-related Rac1 interactor A-like isoform X3
hippocalcin like 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
hippocalcin like 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
hes related family bHLH transcription factor with YRPW motif like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
hairy/enhancer-of-split related with YRPW motif-like protein
poly(A) binding protein cytoplasmic 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(A) binding protein cytoplasmic 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(A) binding protein cytoplasmic 4, transcript variant X2
polyadenylate-binding protein 4 isoform X1
polyadenylate-binding protein 4 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00431
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 35 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 160 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 89 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 163 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 212 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 247 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 168 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X2
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 165 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 160 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 229 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 166 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 179 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 164 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X12
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X11
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X6
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X14
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X10
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X9
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X16
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X15
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X2
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X13
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X1
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X4
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X7
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X3
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X8
microtubule-actin cross-linking factor 1 isoform X5
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit S5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur protein 5
antizyme inhibitor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
antizyme inhibitor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenylate kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenylate kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
adenylate kinase 2, mitochondrial isoform X2
adenylate kinase 2, mitochondrial isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuron-specific calcium-binding protein hippocalcin
fibronectin type III domain containing 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibronectin type III domain-containing protein 5
tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 234 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase 1, transcript variant X3
tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic isoform X1
tyrosine--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic isoform X2
tyrosine--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic isoform X3
tyrosine--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic isoform X4
KIAA1522 ortholog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
KIAA1522 ortholog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
KIAA1522 ortholog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
KIAA1522 ortholog, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein KIAA1522 homolog isoform X1
uncharacterized protein KIAA1522 homolog isoform X2
uncharacterized protein KIAA1522 homolog isoform X3
uncharacterized protein KIAA1522 homolog isoform X4
syncoilin, intermediate filament protein
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
RB binding protein 4, chromatin remodeling factor
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, 22 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: histone-binding protein RBBP4
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 8 opposite strand
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 8A-like, transcript variant X1
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 8A-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 8A-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 8A-like
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 8A
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 8A
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 8B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 8B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 8B isoform X1
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 8B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 8B isoform X2
BSD domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 247 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
BSD domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
BSD domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
BSD domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
testis-specific serine/threonine-protein kinase 3
family with sequence similarity 229 member A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
karyopherin subunit alpha 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 93 long SRA reads, 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
karyopherin subunit alpha 6, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
karyopherin subunit alpha 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
karyopherin subunit alpha 6, transcript variant X4
karyopherin subunit alpha 6, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
karyopherin subunit alpha 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
karyopherin subunit alpha 6, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
karyopherin subunit alpha 6, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 28B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
doublecortin domain containing 2B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
doublecortin domain containing 2B, transcript variant X1
doublecortin domain containing 2B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
doublecortin domain containing 2B, transcript variant X8
doublecortin domain containing 2B, transcript variant X7
doublecortin domain containing 2B, transcript variant X9
doublecortin domain containing 2B, transcript variant X4
doublecortin domain containing 2B, transcript variant X2
doublecortin domain containing 2B, transcript variant X6
doublecortin domain containing 2B, transcript variant X11
doublecortin domain containing 2B, transcript variant X10
doublecortin domain-containing protein 2B isoform X3
doublecortin domain-containing protein 2B isoform X1
doublecortin domain-containing protein 2B isoform X4
doublecortin domain-containing protein 2B isoform X2
doublecortin domain-containing protein 2B isoform X5
doublecortin domain-containing protein 2B isoform X7
doublecortin domain-containing protein 2B isoform X6
doublecortin domain-containing protein 2B isoform X8
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit I
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 79 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 9-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 9-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 9-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 9-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 9-like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 9-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 9-like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 9-like, transcript variant X5
myotubularin-related protein 9-like isoform X2
myotubularin-related protein 9-like isoform X1
family with sequence similarity 167 member B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
LCK proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
LCK proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 390 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 39B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 39B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 39B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 39B, transcript variant X2
KH RNA binding domain containing, signal transduction associated 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
KH domain-containing, RNA-binding, signal transduction-associated protein 1
protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 69 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A2, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA 2 isoform X1
protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA 2 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: adhesion G protein-coupled receptor B2
collagen type XVI alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X3
collagen type XVI alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X2
collagen type XVI alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
tubulointerstitial nephritis antigen like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tubulointerstitial nephritis antigen-like
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily Q member 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 4
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X14
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma, transcript variant X6
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma isoform X10
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma isoform X9
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma isoform X4
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma isoform X3
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma isoform X7
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma isoform X6
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma isoform X2
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma isoform X1
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma isoform X12
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma isoform X8
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma isoform X11
nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma isoform X5
regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis protein 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 536 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CUB and Sushi multiple domains 2, transcript variant X2
CUB and Sushi multiple domains 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CUB and Sushi multiple domains 2, transcript variant X3
CUB and Sushi multiple domains 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CUB and Sushi multiple domains 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CUB and Sushi multiple domains 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CUB and Sushi multiple domains 2, transcript variant X6
CUB and Sushi multiple domains 2, transcript variant X4
CUB and Sushi multiple domains 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CUB and Sushi multiple domains 2, transcript variant X10
CUB and sushi domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
CUB and sushi domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
CUB and sushi domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
CUB and sushi domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
CUB and sushi domain-containing protein 2 isoform X5
CUB and sushi domain-containing protein 2 isoform X6
uncharacterized LOC121058789, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC121058789, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121058789, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC121058789, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC121058789, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC121058789, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC121058789, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC121058789, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC121058889, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121058889, transcript variant X1
gap junction beta-5 protein-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gap junction beta-5 protein-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
gap junction beta-5 protein-like, transcript variant X2
gap junction protein beta 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein beta 3, transcript variant X1
gap junction protein beta 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein beta 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein beta 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein alpha 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein alpha 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein alpha 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: small integral membrane protein 12
DLG associated protein 3, transcript variant X4
DLG associated protein 3, transcript variant X3
DLG associated protein 3, transcript variant X2
DLG associated protein 3, transcript variant X6
DLG associated protein 3, transcript variant X1
DLG associated protein 3, transcript variant X5
disks large-associated protein 3 isoform X2
disks large-associated protein 3 isoform X1
platelet-activating factor receptor-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 34% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: platelet-activating factor receptor-like
transmembrane protein 35B, transcript variant X1
transmembrane protein 35B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
splicing factor proline and glutamine rich, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
splicing factor proline and glutamine rich, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
splicing factor, proline- and glutamine-rich isoform X2
splicing factor proline and glutamine rich, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
splicing factor, proline- and glutamine-rich isoform X1
zinc finger MYM-type containing 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger MYM-type containing 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger MYM-type containing 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger MYM-type containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger MYM-type protein 4 isoform X4
zinc finger MYM-type protein 4 isoform X1
zinc finger MYM-type protein 4 isoform X2
zinc finger MYM-type protein 4 isoform X3
interferon alpha-inducible protein 27-like protein 2A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
interferon alpha-inducible protein 27-like protein 2A, transcript variant X5
interferon alpha-inducible protein 27-like protein 2A, transcript variant X4
interferon alpha-inducible protein 27-like protein 2A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon alpha-inducible protein 27-like protein 2A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon alpha-inducible protein 27-like protein 2A isoform X2
interferon alpha-inducible protein 27-like protein 2A, transcript variant X1
collagen alpha-1(I) chain-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
dyslexia-associated protein KIAA0319-like protein homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 94 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor AP-2 epsilon, transcript variant X1
transcription factor AP-2 epsilon, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor AP-2-epsilon isoform X1
transcription factor AP-2-epsilon isoform X2
proteasome 20S subunit beta 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
proteasome 20S subunit beta 2, transcript variant X2
proteasome subunit beta type-2 isoform X1
proteasome subunit beta type-2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 long SRA reads, 43 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 69 long SRA reads, 31 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 140 long SRA reads, 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein argonaute-3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylserine hydrolase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylserine hydrolase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribose glycohydrolase ARH3 isoform X1
ADP-ribose glycohydrolase ARH3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 108 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 123 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable beta-D-xylosidase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable beta-D-xylosidase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 4 codons; deleted 9 bases in 7 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 4 codons; deleted 9 bases in 7 codons; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: MAP7 domain-containing protein 1
thyroid hormone receptor associated protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
thyroid hormone receptor associated protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
thyroid hormone receptor associated protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein 3 isoform X1
thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein 3 isoform X2
CD2-associated protein-like, transcript variant X4
CD2-associated protein-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CD2-associated protein-like, transcript variant X2
CD2-associated protein-like, transcript variant X3
CD2-associated protein-like, transcript variant X1
translation initiation factor IF-2-like isoform X1
predicted GPI-anchored protein 58 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 81 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein OSCP1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein OSCP1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
protein OSCP1-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein OSCP1-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
U7 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm10 isoform X4
protein OSCP1-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
28S ribosomal protein S15, mitochondrial
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X1
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X5
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 156 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 373 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 3 receptor, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor isoform X5
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor isoform X1
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor isoform X2
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor isoform X4
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor isoform X3
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 90 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 3 isoform X1
glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 903 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYST/Esa1 associated factor 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYST/Esa1 associated factor 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYST/Esa1 associated factor 6, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYST/Esa1 associated factor 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromatin modification-related protein MEAF6 isoform X3
chromatin modification-related protein MEAF6 isoform X2
chromatin modification-related protein MEAF6 isoform X1
MYST/Esa1 associated factor 6, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYST/Esa1 associated factor 6, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromatin modification-related protein MEAF6 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
dynein axonemal light intermediate chain 1, transcript variant X2
dynein axonemal light intermediate chain 1, transcript variant X1
axonemal dynein light intermediate polypeptide 1 isoform X1
axonemal dynein light intermediate polypeptide 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 594 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C1orf109 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycoprotein endo-alpha-1,2-mannosidase-like protein
yrdC N6-threonylcarbamoyltransferase domain containing
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
yrdC domain-containing protein, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 251 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 320 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
type II inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate 5-phosphatase isoform X1
type II inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate 5-phosphatase isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 167 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 596 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 183 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X1
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X5
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X4
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X13
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
four and a half LIM domains protein 3 isoform X3
four and a half LIM domains protein 3 isoform X2
four and a half LIM domains protein 3 isoform X1
UTP11 small subunit processome component
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable U3 small nucleolar RNA-associated protein 11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
POU domain, class 3, transcription factor 1
uncharacterized LOC121058859, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC121058859, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121059004, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC121059004, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ras-related GTP-binding protein C
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: C-Myc-binding protein
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: gap junction alpha-9 protein
progestin and adipoQ receptor family member 7
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: membrane progestin receptor alpha
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 long SRA reads, 35 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase 2, transcript variant X4
platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase 2, cytoplasmic
exostosin like glycosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
exostosin like glycosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
exostosin like glycosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
exostosin like glycosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
exostosin like glycosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
PDLIM1 interacting kinase 1 like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
PDLIM1 interacting kinase 1 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
PDLIM1 interacting kinase 1 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
PDLIM1 interacting kinase 1 like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
PDLIM1 interacting kinase 1 like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
PDLIM1 interacting kinase 1 like, transcript variant X3
PDLIM1 interacting kinase 1 like, transcript variant X5
PDLIM1 interacting kinase 1 like, transcript variant X7
serine/threonine-protein kinase PDIK1L isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase PDIK1L isoform X2
family with sequence similarity 110 member D
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein C1orf232 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
connector enhancer of kinase suppressor of Ras 1, transcript variant X1
connector enhancer of kinase suppressor of Ras 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
connector enhancer of kinase suppressor of Ras 1, transcript variant X4
connector enhancer of kinase suppressor of Ras 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
connector enhancer of kinase suppressor of Ras 1, transcript variant X5
connector enhancer of kinase suppressor of ras 1 isoform X1
connector enhancer of kinase suppressor of ras 1 isoform X3
connector enhancer of kinase suppressor of ras 1 isoform X4
connector enhancer of kinase suppressor of ras 1 isoform X2
connector enhancer of kinase suppressor of ras 1 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
centrosomal protein 85, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 85, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 85, transcript variant X1
centrosomal protein 85, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein of 85 kDa isoform X1
centrosomal protein of 85 kDa isoform X2
centrosomal protein of 85 kDa isoform X3
SH3 domain binding glutamate rich protein like 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich-like protein 3
UBX domain protein 11, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain protein 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain protein 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain protein 11, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain-containing protein 11 isoform X2
UBX domain-containing protein 11 isoform X1
crystallin beta-gamma domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
crystallin beta-gamma domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
beta/gamma crystallin domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
beta/gamma crystallin domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
tissue-resident T-cell transcription regulator protein ZNF683
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase subunit, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 177 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase subunit, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase subunit, transcript variant X5
dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase complex subunit DHDDS isoform X2
dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase complex subunit DHDDS isoform X1
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 83 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein S6 kinase A1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein S6 kinase A1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein S6 kinase A1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-1 isoform X1
ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-1 isoform X4
ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-1 isoform X3
ribosomal protein S6 kinase A1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein S6 kinase A1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-1 isoform X5
ribosomal protein S6 kinase A1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 227 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-1 isoform X2
ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-1 isoform X6
uncharacterized LOC121058943, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121058943, transcript variant X1
AT-rich interaction domain 1A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
AT-rich interaction domain 1A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A isoform X1
AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class V, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class V, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class V, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class V, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class V, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class V, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class V, transcript variant X7
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class V, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class V, transcript variant X6
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class V, transcript variant X8
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class V, transcript variant X10
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class V, transcript variant X11
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 18, transcript variant X3
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 18, transcript variant X1
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 18, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 18, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
GPN-loop GTPase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
GPN-loop GTPase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 0 group B member 2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: nuclear receptor subfamily 0 group B member 2
nuclear distribution C, dynein complex regulator
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: nuclear migration protein nudC
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: keratinocyte differentiation factor 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121058806, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121058806, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD and tetratricopeptide repeats 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD and tetratricopeptide repeats 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD and tetratricopeptide repeats protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 664 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
synaptotagmin like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
synaptotagmin like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CD164 molecule like 2, transcript variant X2
CD164 sialomucin-like 2 protein isoform X2
CD164 molecule like 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
CD164 sialomucin-like 2 protein isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
WASP family member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
WASP family member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
WASP family member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family member 2
AT-hook DNA binding motif containing 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
AT-hook DNA binding motif containing 1, transcript variant X10
AT-hook DNA binding motif containing 1, transcript variant X3
AT-hook DNA binding motif containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
AT-hook DNA binding motif containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
AT-hook DNA binding motif containing 1, transcript variant X4
AT-hook DNA binding motif containing 1, transcript variant X7
AT-hook DNA binding motif containing 1, transcript variant X6
AT-hook DNA binding motif containing 1, transcript variant X5
AT-hook DNA binding motif containing 1, transcript variant X8
AT-hook DNA-binding motif-containing protein 1 isoform X2
AT-hook DNA-binding motif-containing protein 1 isoform X1
AT-hook DNA-binding motif-containing protein 1 isoform X3
FGR proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
FGR proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
FGR proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
FGR proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
FGR proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X3
digestive cysteine proteinase 1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
counting factor associated protein D-like isoform X1
digestive cysteine proteinase 1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
digestive cysteine proteinase 1-like isoform X2
digestive cysteine proteinase 1-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 82 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
digestive cysteine proteinase 1-like isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
translation initiation factor IF-2-like, transcript variant X4
translation initiation factor IF-2-like, transcript variant X2
translation initiation factor IF-2-like, transcript variant X3
translation initiation factor IF-2-like, transcript variant X1
translation initiation factor IF-2-like isoform X2
family with sequence similarity 76 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 76 member A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 120 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphatase and actin regulator 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 4 isoform X4
phosphatase and actin regulator 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 4 isoform X2
phosphatase and actin regulator 4, transcript variant X1
phosphatase and actin regulator 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatase and actin regulator 4 isoform X3
phosphatase and actin regulator 4, transcript variant X9
phosphatase and actin regulator 4 isoform X1
regulator of chromosome condensation 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of chromosome condensation 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00045
regulator of chromosome condensation 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of chromosome condensation 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of chromosome condensation 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of chromosome condensation isoform X1
regulator of chromosome condensation isoform X2
opioid receptor delta 1, transcript variant X2
opioid receptor delta 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription elongation factor A protein 3
ArfGAP with SH3 domain, ankyrin repeat and PH domain 3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 6 bases in 6 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 6 bases in 6 codons; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: arf-GAP with SH3 domain, ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: transcription factor E2F2-like
inhibitor of DNA binding 3, HLH protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of DNA binding 3, HLH protein, transcript variant X2
YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein 2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: YTH domain-containing family protein 2
glucocorticoid modulatory element binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
glucocorticoid modulatory element binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
glucocorticoid modulatory element-binding protein 1
discoidin, CUB and LCCL domain-containing protein 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00548
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 12, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 12 isoform X2
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 12 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00608
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00420
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00405
small nucleolar RNA SNORA16B/SNORA16A family
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00190
tRNA selenocysteine 1 associated protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA selenocysteine 1 associated protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA selenocysteine 1 associated protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA selenocysteine 1 associated protein 1, transcript variant X1
tRNA selenocysteine 1-associated protein 1 isoform X3
tRNA selenocysteine 1-associated protein 1 isoform X1
tRNA selenocysteine 1-associated protein 1 isoform X2
tRNA selenocysteine 1 associated protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, 30 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transmembrane protein 200B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 200B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 200B, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC121058979, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC121058979, transcript variant X1
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4, transcript variant X4
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4, transcript variant X3
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4, transcript variant X5
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X7
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X6
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X2
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X4
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X1
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X3
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X8
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X5
serine and arginine rich splicing factor 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine and arginine rich splicing factor 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 4 isoform X1
serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 4 isoform X2
mitochondrial trans-2-enoyl-CoA reductase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial trans-2-enoyl-CoA reductase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial trans-2-enoyl-CoA reductase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase, mitochondrial isoform X1
enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase, mitochondrial isoform X2
protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type U, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type U, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase U isoform X1
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase U isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC121058792, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121058792, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC121058792, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 362 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysosomal-associated transmembrane protein 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 381 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 93 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 68 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 192 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 106 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 196 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X3
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 78 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X28
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X39
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X37
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X33
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X30
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X29
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X32
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X35
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X36
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
pumilio RNA binding family member 1, transcript variant X34
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00188
sodium/potassium transporting ATPase interacting 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium/potassium transporting ATPase interacting 1, transcript variant X4
sodium/potassium transporting ATPase interacting 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium/potassium transporting ATPase interacting 1, transcript variant X3
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit beta-1-interacting protein 1 isoform X1
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit beta-1-interacting protein 1 isoform X2
sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit beta-1-interacting protein 1 isoform X3
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein U5 subunit 40
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein 40 kDa protein
zinc finger CCHC-type containing 17, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCHC-type containing 17, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCHC-type containing 17, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 62 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X5
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X11
HIVEP zinc finger 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X11
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X8
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Scm polycomb group protein homolog 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 138 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cbp/p300 interacting transactivator with Glu/Asp rich carboxy-terminal domain 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1331 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 371 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 187 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear inhibitor of protein phosphatase 1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00553
thymocyte selection associated family member 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
replication protein A2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
replication protein A2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 109 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
replication protein A 32 kDa subunit isoform X2
replication protein A 32 kDa subunit isoform X1
sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase acid like 3B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase acid like 3B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
acid sphingomyelinase-like phosphodiesterase 3b
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 74 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 long SRA reads, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 222 long SRA reads, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 86 long SRA reads, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 62 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 long SRA reads, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1696 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 289 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase inhibitory factor subunit 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 185 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 266 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91 long SRA reads, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R isoform X1
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R isoform X2
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R isoform X3
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R isoform X4
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1D, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1D, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1D, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine zipper protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine zipper protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine zipper protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine zipper protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
leucine zipper protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine demethylase 1A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine demethylase 1A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific histone demethylase 1A isoform X2
lysine-specific histone demethylase 1A isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 413 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 201 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns