Anas platyrhynchos isolate Z2 breed Pekin duck chromosome 18, ZJU1.0, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Archelosauria; Archosauria; Dinosauria; Saurischia; Theropoda; Coelurosauria; Aves; Neognathae; Galloanserae; Anseriformes; Anatidae; Anatinae; Anas.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM027260.1.\nAssembly name: ZJU1.0\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Zhejiang University on\n2020/11/23. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession JACGAL000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Zhejiang University\nAssembly Method :: FALCON-Unzip v. git 12072017\nAssembly Name :: ZJU1.0\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: No\nGenome Coverage :: 143.0x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio RSII; PacBio Sequel\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Anas platyrhynchos Annotation\n Release 104\nAnnotation Version :: 104\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.5\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 2-like isoform X2
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 2-like isoform X1
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X2
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2, transcript variant X12
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X11
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X9
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X8
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X7
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X5
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X6
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain-containing protein 2 isoform X10
uncharacterized LOC113841571, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC113841571, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial carrier homolog 1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 114 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial carrier homolog 1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 116 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial carrier homolog 1-like isoform X1
mitochondrial carrier homolog 1-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2, transcript variant X1
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2 isoform X1
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2 isoform X2
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2 isoform X4
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity testis-specific protein kinase 2 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mannosidase alpha class 1B member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannosidase alpha class 1B member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
endoplasmic reticulum mannosyl-oligosaccharide 1,2-alpha-mannosidase isoform X2
endoplasmic reticulum mannosyl-oligosaccharide 1,2-alpha-mannosidase isoform X1
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase 1 like 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 109 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase 1 like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 111 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase 1 like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-N-acetylhexosamine pyrophosphorylase-like protein 1 isoform X2
UDP-N-acetylhexosamine pyrophosphorylase-like protein 1 isoform X3
UDP-N-acetylhexosamine pyrophosphorylase-like protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 99 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor APC domain-containing protein 2
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 100 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 100 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 2 isoform X1
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 2 isoform X2
transmembrane protein 141, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 141, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 141, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAXX non-homologous end joining factor, transcript variant X7
PAXX non-homologous end joining factor, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAXX non-homologous end joining factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAXX non-homologous end joining factor, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAXX non-homologous end joining factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAXX non-homologous end joining factor, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 78 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAXX non-homologous end joining factor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 76 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAXX non-homologous end joining factor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 82 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel protein 3
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 85 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 2, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X3
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X2
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X6
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X4
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X10
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X8
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X9
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X5
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X7
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X1
ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 2 isoform X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 90 samples with support for all annotated introns
POU domain, class 5, transcription factor 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural proliferation, differentiation and control 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural proliferation, differentiation and control 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 103 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural proliferation differentiation and control protein 1 isoform X2
neural proliferation differentiation and control protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 9% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
extracellular fatty acid-binding protein-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 110 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 120 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement C8 gamma chain, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 105 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement component C8 gamma chain isoform X2
complement C8 gamma chain, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement C8 gamma chain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement component C8 gamma chain isoform X1
complement component C8 gamma chain isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor associated factor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor associated factor 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 78 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor associated factor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 106 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor associated factor 2, transcript variant X4
TNF receptor associated factor 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor-associated factor 2 isoform X1
TNF receptor-associated factor 2 isoform X3
TNF receptor-associated factor 2 isoform X2
TNF receptor associated factor 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor-associated factor 2 isoform X4
endothelial differentiation related factor 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
endothelial differentiation-related factor 1
apical endosomal glycoprotein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
apical endosomal glycoprotein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
apical endosomal glycoprotein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
apical endosomal glycoprotein isoform X3
apical endosomal glycoprotein isoform X2
apical endosomal glycoprotein isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
apical junction component 1 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
apical junction component 1 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB, member RAS oncogene family like 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB, member RAS oncogene family like 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 102 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB, member RAS oncogene family like 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 83 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
notch-regulated ankyrin repeat-containing protein
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X9
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 83 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 95 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 104 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 104 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
exonuclease 3'-5' domain containing 3, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 85 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 101 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8 isoform X3
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8 isoform X1
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 8 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 113 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 92 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADPH-dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1 isoform X1
NADPH-dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1 isoform X2
NADPH-dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1 isoform X3
ring finger protein 208, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 208, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC113845451, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC113845451, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC113845451, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 98 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 26
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X10
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X11
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X8
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X9
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X7
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X4
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X3
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X2
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X6
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X1
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001310360.2
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 precursor
COORDINATES: ab initio prediction:SignalP:4.0
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X2
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X6
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X5
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X1
glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1, transcript variant X11
glutamate receptor ionotropic, NMDA 1 isoform X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X18
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 91 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X6
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X5
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X15
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X14
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X8
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X2
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X13
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X7
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 618, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC113845464, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC113845464, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA threonine (anticodon AGU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 111 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X1
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X2
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X4
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X3
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X5
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X7
regulator of G-protein signaling 3 isoform X6
DNA polymerase epsilon 3, accessory subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA polymerase epsilon 3, accessory subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
haloacid dehalogenase like hydrolase domain containing 3
haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain-containing protein 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
B box and SPRY domain-containing protein
WD repeat domain 31, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 31, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 31, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat-containing protein 31 isoform X1
WD repeat domain 31, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat-containing protein 31 isoform X2
U4/U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Prp4
anaphase-promoting complex subunit CDC26
solute carrier family 31 member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 109 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 31 member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 31 member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 31 member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 96 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase family member 15, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase family member 15, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase family member 15, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 123 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase family member 15, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 123 samples with support for all annotated introns
FKBP prolyl isomerase family member 15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat and sterile alpha motif containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat and sterile alpha motif containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat and sterile alpha motif containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 111 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat and sterile alpha motif containing 1, transcript variant X2
leucine rich repeat and sterile alpha motif containing 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase LRSAM1 isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase LRSAM1 isoform X4
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase LRSAM1 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase LRSAM1 isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase LRSAM1 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00302
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger MYND domain-containing protein 19
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: diphthine methyltransferase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
39S ribosomal protein L41, mitochondrial
patatin like phospholipase domain containing 7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X9
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 112 samples with support for all annotated introns
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X4
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X11
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X9
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X5
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X10
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X7
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X8
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X12
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X13
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X1
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X2
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor, transcript variant X6
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X1
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X8
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X6
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X12
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X2
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X13
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X3
NMDA receptor synaptonuclear signaling and neuronal migration factor isoform X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 114 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1, transcript variant X2
Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1 isoform X3
Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1 isoform X2
Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1 homolog isoform X1
torsin family 4 member A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
torsin family 4 member A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 97 samples with support for all annotated introns
torsin family 4 member A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 81 samples with support for all annotated introns
torsin family 4 member A, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
torsin family 4 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
torsin family 4 member A, transcript variant X3
torsin family 4 member A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
torsin family 4 member A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 118 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X3
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 123 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like
family with sequence similarity 166 member A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 189 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106019537, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106019537, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106019537, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106019537, transcript variant X4
ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 2
negative elongation factor complex member B
uncharacterized LOC119713082, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119713082, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119713082, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119713082, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: glutamine synthetase
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: arrestin domain-containing protein 1
uncharacterized LOC119713115, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119713115, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 113 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 118 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 118 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X6
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X8
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X7
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X4
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X4
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 83 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 116 samples with support for all annotated introns
euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X5
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT1 isoform X3
calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B
voltage-dependent N-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1B
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: collagen alpha-1(I) chain-like
solute carrier family 31 member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 31 member 2, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 31 member 2, transcript variant X2
probable low affinity copper uptake protein 2 isoform X1
probable low affinity copper uptake protein 2 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein Niban 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
syntaxin binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
syntaxin binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: microtubule organization protein AKNA
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X2
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X3
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X7
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X10
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X12
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106017965, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC106017965, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110353216, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110353216, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC110353216, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110353216, transcript variant X2
TNF superfamily member 15, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF superfamily member 15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 104 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF superfamily member 15, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 8
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 32, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 123 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 32, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 32, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 32, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 85 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 32, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM32 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM32 isoform X2
CMP-N-acetylneuraminate-beta-galactosamide- alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 4-like, transcript variant X1
CMP-N-acetylneuraminate-beta-galactosamide- alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 4-like, transcript variant X2
CMP-N-acetylneuraminate-beta-galactosamide- alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 4-like
toll like receptor 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
toll like receptor 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001310413.1
The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001297342.1
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC119713116, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119713116, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110354167, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110354167, transcript variant X2
BMP/retinoic acid inducible neural specific 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
BMP/retinoic acid inducible neural specific 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
BMP/retinoic acid-inducible neural-specific protein 1 isoform X1
BMP/retinoic acid-inducible neural-specific protein 1 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC113845437, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC113845437, transcript variant X2
CDK5 regulatory subunit associated protein 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDK5 regulatory subunit associated protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 112 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDK5 regulatory subunit associated protein 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDK5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 2 isoform X3
CDK5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 2 isoform X1
CDK5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 2 isoform X4
CDK5 regulatory subunit associated protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDK5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 120 samples with support for all annotated introns
multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein 9
collagen type XXVII alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type XXVII alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X2
collagen type XXVII alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X3
collagen alpha-1(XXVII) chain isoform X1
collagen alpha-1(XXVII) chain isoform X2
solute carrier family 25 member 25, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25 member 25, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein SCaMC-2 isoform X2
calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein SCaMC-2 isoform X1
solute carrier family 25 member 25, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25 member 25, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein SCaMC-2 isoform X4
calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein SCaMC-2 isoform X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: nuclear apoptosis-inducing factor 1
family with sequence similarity 102 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 102 member A, transcript variant X2
dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase subunit 2, regulatory
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 105 samples with support for all annotated introns
dolichol phosphate-mannose biosynthesis regulatory protein
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase-like protein 1 isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase-like protein 1 isoform X2
ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 111 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminyl-2,3-beta-galactosyl-1, 3-N-acetyl-galactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase
ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X2
ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X5
alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6 isoform X1
alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6 isoform X2
alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6 isoform X3
ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 106 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 110 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6 isoform X4
alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 6 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: folylpolyglutamate synthase, mitochondrial
SH2 domain containing 3C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SH2 domain-containing protein 3C isoform X2
SH2 domain containing 3C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SH2 domain-containing protein 3C isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 16, transcript variant X2
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 16, transcript variant X1
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 16, transcript variant X5
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 16, transcript variant X3
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 16, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 16 isoform X4
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 16 isoform X2
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 16 isoform X1
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 16 isoform X3
cerebral endothelial cell adhesion molecule
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
inactive glycosyltransferase 25 family member 3
long-chain fatty acid transport protein 4
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon UCU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
ubiquinone biosynthesis protein COQ4 homolog, mitochondrial
TruB pseudouridine synthase family member 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 120 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial mRNA pseudouridine synthase TRUB2
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 26
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 92 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC113845468, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC113845468, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 83 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 108 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106015567, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC106015567, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC106015567, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC106015567, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC106015567, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106015567, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106015567, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC106015567, transcript variant X8
collagen type V alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type V alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type V alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 106 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119713097, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC119713097, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119713097, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC119713097, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119713097, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119713097, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC119713097, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119713097, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119713097, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC119713097 isoform X3
uncharacterized protein LOC119713097 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC119713097 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119713102, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119713102, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119713102, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00619
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
bromodomain containing 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 3, transcript variant X3
bromodomain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 78 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
bromodomain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
bromodomain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 89 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
vav guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2, transcript variant X1
vav guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2, transcript variant X2
vav guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2, transcript variant X3
vav guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2, transcript variant X4
guanine nucleotide exchange factor VAV2 isoform X1
guanine nucleotide exchange factor VAV2 isoform X3
guanine nucleotide exchange factor VAV2 isoform X2
guanine nucleotide exchange factor VAV2 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 92 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 163 member B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 80 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 76 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
myomaker, myoblast fusion factor, transcript variant X1
myomaker, myoblast fusion factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
myomaker, myoblast fusion factor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 6
calcium channel flower domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 101 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 13, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 13, transcript variant X3
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 13, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 13, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 80 samples with support for all annotated introns
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 13 isoform X2
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 13 isoform X4
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 13 isoform X3
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 13 isoform X5
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 13 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 114 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X9
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X8
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
serine/threonine kinase like domain containing 1, transcript variant X10
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X3
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X6
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X2
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X9
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X7
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X5
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X8
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X4
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X1
serine/threonine kinase-like domain-containing protein STKLD1 isoform X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: surfeit locus protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00049
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00069
mediator complex subunit 22, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 116 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator complex subunit 22, transcript variant X1
mediator complex subunit 22, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 22 isoform X1
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 22 isoform X2
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 22 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 114 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 180, transcript variant X1
coiled-coil domain containing 180, transcript variant X2
coiled-coil domain containing 180, transcript variant X3
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 180 isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 180 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC110351610, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110351610, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 (FORS blood group), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 (FORS blood group), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 (FORS blood group), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 isoform X1
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 (FORS blood group), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 (FORS blood group), transcript variant X4
globoside alpha-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 isoform X2
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 96 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X4
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X2
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 123 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 123 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X1
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator isoform X3
general transcription factor IIIC subunit 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIIC subunit 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor 3C polypeptide 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
growth factor independent 1B transcriptional repressor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
growth factor independent 1B transcriptional repressor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
TSC complex subunit 1, transcript variant X2
TSC complex subunit 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 120 samples with support for all annotated introns
TSC complex subunit 1, transcript variant X5
TSC complex subunit 1, transcript variant X1
TSC complex subunit 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 80 samples with support for all annotated introns
TSC complex subunit 1, transcript variant X6
sperm acrosome associated 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
sperm acrosome associated 9, transcript variant X2
sperm acrosome-associated protein 9 isoform X2
sperm acrosome-associated protein 9 isoform X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIIC subunit 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIIC subunit 4, transcript variant X1
general transcription factor 3C polypeptide 4 isoform X1
general transcription factor IIIC subunit 4, transcript variant X3
general transcription factor IIIC subunit 4, transcript variant X4
general transcription factor 3C polypeptide 4 isoform X2
general transcription factor 3C polypeptide 4 isoform X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 77
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 77
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 123 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 106 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 119 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106015082, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106015082, transcript variant X2
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 27
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X7
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X5
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X9
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X8
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 103 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 120 samples with support for all annotated introns
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X1
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X6
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X9
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X10
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X2
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X7
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X8
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X11
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X12
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X5
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X3
Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1, transcript variant X4
rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 102 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: uridine-cytidine kinase 1
protein O-mannosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein O-mannosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 93 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein O-mannosyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 110 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 99 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 106 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 120 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 120 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 120 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 120 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 83 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich coiled-coil 2B, transcript variant X9
phospholipid phosphatase 7 (inactive), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 7 (inactive), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
inactive phospholipid phosphatase 7 isoform X1
inactive phospholipid phosphatase 7 isoform X2
family with sequence similarity 78 member A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear pore complex protein Nup214 isoform X3
nuclear pore complex protein Nup214 isoform X2
nuclear pore complex protein Nup214 isoform X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 6 bases in 5 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 6 bases in 5 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: laminin subunit gamma-3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: fibrinogen C domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ABL proto-oncogene 1, non-receptor tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABL proto-oncogene 1, non-receptor tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABL proto-oncogene 1, non-receptor tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABL proto-oncogene 1, non-receptor tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
ABL proto-oncogene 1, non-receptor tyrosine kinase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
far upstream element binding protein 3, transcript variant X4
far upstream element binding protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 96 samples with support for all annotated introns
far upstream element binding protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
far upstream element binding protein 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
far upstream element binding protein 3, transcript variant X1
far upstream element-binding protein 3 isoform X4
far upstream element-binding protein 3 isoform X3
far upstream element-binding protein 3 isoform X2
far upstream element-binding protein 3 isoform X5
far upstream element-binding protein 3 isoform X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 99 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: argininosuccinate synthase
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 4 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 4 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 107, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 77 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-coupled receptor 107, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 122 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X9
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X16
formin binding protein 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 20, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 110 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 20, transcript variant X1
ubiquitin specific peptidase 20, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 82 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 20, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 20, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 83 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 20
telomere length and silencing protein 1 homolog
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 84 samples with support for all annotated introns
prostaglandin E synthase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
prostaglandin E synthase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 83 samples with support for all annotated introns
prostaglandin E synthase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
prostaglandin E synthase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 84 samples with support for all annotated introns
prostaglandin E synthase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 101 samples with support for all annotated introns
prostaglandin E synthase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 99 samples with support for all annotated introns
prostaglandin E synthase, transcript variant X7
paired related homeobox 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
paired related homeobox 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 89 samples with support for all annotated introns
paired mesoderm homeobox protein 2 isoform X2
paired mesoderm homeobox protein 2 isoform X1
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 6, transcript variant X1
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 107 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 6 isoform X1
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 6 isoform X2
N-terminal Xaa-Pro-Lys N-methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 114 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-terminal Xaa-Pro-Lys N-methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 114 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-terminal Xaa-Pro-Lys N-methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
N-terminal Xaa-Pro-Lys N-methyltransferase 1
uncharacterized LOC110351601, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC110351601, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC110351601, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC110351601, transcript variant X2
immediate early response gene 5-like protein
protein phosphatase 2 phosphatase activator
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A activator
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 123 samples with support for all annotated introns
dolichyldiphosphatase 1, transcript variant X2
dolichyldiphosphatase 1, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC113839622, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC113839622, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC113839622, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC113839622, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC113839622, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC113839622, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X8
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X2
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X9
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain containing GRB2 like, endophilin B2, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC119718720, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119718720, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 84 samples with support for all annotated introns
phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 118 samples with support for all annotated introns
phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
leucine rich repeat containing 8 VRAC subunit A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 93 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat containing 8 VRAC subunit A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 91 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat containing 8 VRAC subunit A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 112 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat containing 8 VRAC subunit A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat containing 8 VRAC subunit A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
volume-regulated anion channel subunit LRRC8A
kynurenine aminotransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
kynurenine aminotransferase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
kynurenine aminotransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
kynurenine aminotransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
kynurenine--oxoglutarate transaminase 1 isoform X1
kynurenine aminotransferase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
kynurenine--oxoglutarate transaminase 1 isoform X2
SPOUT domain containing methyltransferase 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 119 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative methyltransferase C9orf114 homolog
uncharacterized LOC110353292, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110353292, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC110353292, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC110353292, transcript variant X1
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase N3, transcript variant X1
protein kinase N3, transcript variant X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase N3 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase N3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
dynein 2 intermediate chain 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoplasmic dynein 2 intermediate chain 2 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC113845466, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC113845466, transcript variant X2
dynein 2 intermediate chain 2, transcript variant X1
cytoplasmic dynein 2 intermediate chain 2 isoform X1
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X7
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X2
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X5
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X11
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha, non-erythrocytic 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X9
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X8
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X4
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X6
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X2
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X7
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X5
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X1
spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 isoform X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 97 samples with support for all annotated introns
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 2, transcript variant X2
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 99 samples with support for all annotated introns
cip1-interacting zinc finger protein isoform X2
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X4
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X1
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X2
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
cip1-interacting zinc finger protein isoform X3
cip1-interacting zinc finger protein isoform X1
cip1-interacting zinc finger protein isoform X4
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 105 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDKN1A interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
cip1-interacting zinc finger protein isoform X6
cip1-interacting zinc finger protein isoform X5
uncharacterized LOC119718730, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119718730, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 116 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 113 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 108 samples with support for all annotated introns
SWI5 homologous recombination repair protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 113 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 123 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00560
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 117 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 2
1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase beta
EGF like domain multiple 7, transcript variant X5
EGF like domain multiple 7, transcript variant X1
EGF like domain multiple 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
EGF like domain multiple 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 91 samples with support for all annotated introns
EGF like domain multiple 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 116 samples with support for all annotated introns
epidermal growth factor-like protein 7 isoform X2
epidermal growth factor-like protein 7 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 89 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 118 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1
SEC16 homolog A, endoplasmic reticulum export factor
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein transport protein Sec16A
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase E, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 114 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase E, transcript variant X2
phosphatidylinositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase type IV
peptidase, mitochondrial processing subunit alpha
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: mitochondrial-processing peptidase subunit alpha
endosome associated trafficking regulator 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
endosome associated trafficking regulator 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 113 samples with support for all annotated introns
endosome-associated-trafficking regulator 1
small nuclear RNA activating complex polypeptide 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
snRNA-activating protein complex subunit 4
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X6
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X2
caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 isoform X1
caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 isoform X2
caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 isoform X5
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X3
caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 isoform X3
caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 isoform X4
caspase recruitment domain family member 9, transcript variant X7
caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 isoform X6
uncharacterized LOC101793665, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC101793665, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC101793665, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC101793665, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC101793665, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC101793665, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC101793665, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC101793665, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC101793665, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC101793665, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC101793665, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized protein LOC101793665 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC101793665 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: G-protein-signaling modulator 1
centrosome-associated protein 350, transcript variant X1
centrosome-associated protein 350, transcript variant X2
centrosome-associated protein 350 isoform X1
centrosome-associated protein 350 isoform X2
centrosome-associated protein 350, transcript variant X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 123 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: sulfhydryl oxidase 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC106018072, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106018072, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106018072, transcript variant X2
NACC family member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 118 samples with support for all annotated introns
NACC family member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
NACC family member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
NACC family member 2, transcript variant X4
NACC family member 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin-associated domain-containing protein 1
calmodulin regulated spectrin associated protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
calmodulin regulated spectrin associated protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
calmodulin regulated spectrin associated protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 120 samples with support for all annotated introns
calmodulin-regulated spectrin-associated protein 1 isoform X2
calmodulin-regulated spectrin-associated protein 1 isoform X1
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X2
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X4
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X1
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X8
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X9
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X10
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X2
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X4
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X3
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X5
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X1
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X7
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X11
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X9
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X10
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X8
potassium sodium-activated channel subfamily T member 1, transcript variant X6
potassium channel subfamily T member 1 isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase LOC100288842 homolog
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: PHD finger protein 19
TNF receptor associated factor 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor associated factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor associated factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor associated factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor associated factor 1, transcript variant X1
TNF receptor associated factor 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 104 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor associated factor 1, transcript variant X5
TNF receptor associated factor 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor-associated factor 1 isoform X2
TNF receptor-associated factor 1 isoform X4
TNF receptor-associated factor 1 isoform X1
TNF receptor-associated factor 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement C5-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement C5-like, transcript variant X2
complement C5-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 93 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 108 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 103 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB14, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 104 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB14, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 111 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 104 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 104 samples with support for all annotated introns
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X3
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X1
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X4
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X2
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X5
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 105 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X6
DAB2 interacting protein, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 106 samples with support for all annotated introns
disabled homolog 2-interacting protein isoform X7
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 84 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: tubulin polyglutamylase TTLL11
carboxyl-terminal PDZ ligand of neuronal nitric oxide synthase protein-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit A8
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 8
MORN repeat containing 5, transcript variant X3
MORN repeat containing 5, transcript variant X5
MORN repeat-containing protein 5 isoform X2
MORN repeat-containing protein 5 isoform X4
MORN repeat containing 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
MORN repeat containing 5, transcript variant X2
MORN repeat containing 5, transcript variant X1
MORN repeat-containing protein 5 isoform X1
MORN repeat-containing protein 5 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 77 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mitochondrial ribosome recycling factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosome recycling factor, transcript variant X1
ribosome-recycling factor, mitochondrial
uncharacterized LOC106020040, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC106020040, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC106020040, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106020040, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106020040, transcript variant X2
prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 113 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 107 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 108 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 103 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 101 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 102 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger and CCCH-type domains 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 113 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger and CCCH-type domains 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 96 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger and CCCH-type domains 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 118 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger and CCCH-type domains 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 119 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00579
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 6
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 26, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 26, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 26, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 26, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 99 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 26, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 26
RAB GTPase activating protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB GTPase activating protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 120 samples with support for all annotated introns
rab GTPase-activating protein 1 isoform X1
rab GTPase-activating protein 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X13
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X11
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X9
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 97 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatid perinuclear RNA-binding protein isoform X5
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X3
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X2
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X4
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X1
spermatid perinuclear RNA-binding protein isoform X6
spermatid perinuclear RNA-binding protein isoform X2
spermatid perinuclear RNA-binding protein isoform X1
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 119 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein, transcript variant X5
spermatid perinuclear RNA-binding protein isoform X4
spermatid perinuclear RNA-binding protein isoform X3
crumbs cell polarity complex component 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
crumbs cell polarity complex component 2, transcript variant X2
crumbs cell polarity complex component 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
crumbs cell polarity complex component 2, transcript variant X4
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X2
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X8
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X7
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X6
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X3
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X2
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X4
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X1
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X5
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X7
DENN domain-containing protein 1A isoform X8
DENN domain containing 1A, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC106018598, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC106018598, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC106018598, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC110353583, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC110353583, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119713086, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119713086, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119713086, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119713086, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119713086, transcript variant X5
NIMA related kinase 6, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 99 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIMA related kinase 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIMA related kinase 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
NIMA related kinase 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 88 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek6 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek6 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: adhesion G-protein coupled receptor D2
nuclear receptor subfamily 5 group A member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 5 group A member 1, transcript variant X1
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 97 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1, transcript variant X2
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1, transcript variant X6
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1 isoform X2
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1 isoform X1
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1 isoform X3
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1 isoform X4
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1 isoform X5
nuclear receptor subfamily 6 group A member 1 isoform X6
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: olfactomedin-like protein 2A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
actin related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5 like
actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5-like protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 catalytic subunit
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 88 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: rab9 effector protein with kelch motifs
heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTPase activating protein and VPS9 domains 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: GTPase-activating protein and VPS9 domain-containing protein 1
MAPK associated protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 117 samples with support for all annotated introns
MAPK associated protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 117 samples with support for all annotated introns
target of rapamycin complex 2 subunit MAPKAP1 isoform X2
target of rapamycin complex 2 subunit MAPKAP1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 76 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 117 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 3 isoform X1
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 3 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 84 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 3 isoform X2
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 3 isoform X3
multivesicular body subunit 12B, transcript variant X5
multivesicular body subunit 12B, transcript variant X2
multivesicular body subunit 12B, transcript variant X1
multivesicular body subunit 12B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 123 samples with support for all annotated introns
multivesicular body subunit 12B isoform X2
multivesicular body subunit 12B, transcript variant X4
multivesicular body subunit 12B, transcript variant X6
multivesicular body subunit 12B, transcript variant X3
multivesicular body subunit 12B isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM homeobox transcription factor 1-beta isoform X1
LIM homeobox transcription factor 1-beta isoform X2
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 43
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 125 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 43
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 34, transcript variant X1
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 34, transcript variant X2
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 34
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X13
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X20
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X5
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X14
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X12
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X15
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X1
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X17
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X19
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X7
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X8
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X18
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 103 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X9
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X2
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X16
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X4
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X10
Ral GEF with PH domain and SH3 binding motif 1, transcript variant X3
ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor RalGPS1 isoform X5
ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor RalGPS1 isoform X1
ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor RalGPS1 isoform X2
ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor RalGPS1 isoform X4
ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor RalGPS1 isoform X3
ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor RalGPS1 isoform X6
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 107 samples with support for all annotated introns
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 2 isoform X1
F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 2 isoform X2
solute carrier family 2 member 8, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 2 member 8, transcript variant X1
solute carrier family 2 member 8, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 8 isoform X1
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 8 isoform X2
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 8 isoform X3
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X2
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GHJL01006278.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 1539 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 92 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTPase activating Rap/RanGAP domain like 3, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 1539 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 121 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 1287 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X2
GTPase-activating Rap/Ran-GAP domain-like protein 3 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns