Taeniopygia guttata isolate Blue55 chromosome 16, bTaeGut1.4.pri, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Archelosauria; Archosauria; Dinosauria; Saurischia; Theropoda; Coelurosauria; Aves; Neognathae; Passeriformes; Passeroidea; Estrildidae; Estrildinae; Taeniopygia.
Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM012098.2.\nOn May 24, 2021 this sequence version replaced NC_044228.1.\nAssembly name: bTaeGut1.4.pri\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Vertebrate Genomes Project on\n2021/05/04. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession RRCB00000000.2.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Vertebrate Genomes Project\nAssembly Date :: 09-APR-2021\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 5.1.1; FALCON unzip v.\n Nov2017(uc4); Purge_dups v. 1.0.1;\n Scaff10X v. 4.1.0; Bionano Solve\n BspQI/BssSI v. 3.4; Salsa2 v. 2.2.; Arrow\n polishing v. variantCaller 2.3.3; Merfin\n filtering v. 0.1; longranger align v.\n 2.2.2; freebayes polishing v. 1.3.1;\n gEVAL manual curation v. 2021-04-09; VGP\n pipeline v. 1.7\nAssembly Name :: bTaeGut1.4.pri\nDiploid :: Principal Pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: No\nGenome Coverage :: 88.2x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio RSII; 10X Genomics linked reads;\n Bionano Genomics two enzymes; Arima\n Genomics Hi-C\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Taeniopygia guttata Annotation\n Release 106\nAnnotation Version :: 106\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.6\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Matt Biegler, Duke University and Rockefeller University
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 109 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X9
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X13
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X12
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Tu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial isoform X4
elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial isoform X6
elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial isoform X5
elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial isoform X3
elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial isoform X7
elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial isoform X1
elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial isoform X2
elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial isoform X11
elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial isoform X8
elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial isoform X10
elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial isoform X12
elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial isoform X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha, muscle-specific form-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 EST, 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
integrin alpha-X-like, transcript variant X3
integrin alpha-X-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrin alpha-X-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrin alpha-X-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
translational activator of cytochrome c oxidase 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 80 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit A-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
hydroxy-delta-5-steroid dehydrogenase, 3 beta- and steroid delta-isomerase 7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 7
ATPase sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ transporting 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: microfibril-associated glycoprotein 4
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like isoform X1
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like isoform X2
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like isoform X3
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2-like isoform X5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):INSD:EF191867.1
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 74 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 164 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 3 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
CDP-diacylglycerol--inositol 3-phosphatidyltransferase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 97 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 153 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLX1 homolog B, structure-specific endonuclease subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 88 samples with support for all annotated introns
structure-specific endonuclease subunit SLX1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline dehydrogenase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
proline dehydrogenase 2, transcript variant X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein isoform X5
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein isoform X3
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like isoform X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein isoform X9
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein isoform X8
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like isoform X10
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like isoform X4
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein, transcript variant X6
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein isoform X6
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C-like protein isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
INO80 complex subunit E, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
INO80 complex subunit E, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
INO80 complex subunit E, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAXIP1 associated glutamate rich protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
PAXIP1-associated glutamate-rich protein 1
vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1, transcript variant X1
vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1
vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 116 samples with support for all annotated introns
vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
branched chain keto acid dehydrogenase kinase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-methyl-2-oxobutanoate dehydrogenase [lipoamide] kinase, mitochondrial
FUS RNA binding protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
FUS RNA binding protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
lysine acetyltransferase 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone acetyltransferase KAT8 isoform X3
lysine acetyltransferase 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone acetyltransferase KAT8 isoform X1
lysine acetyltransferase 8, transcript variant X2
histone acetyltransferase KAT8 isoform X2
NOP9 nucleolar protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
NOP9 nucleolar protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase TAO2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 133 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase TAO2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase TAO2-like isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase TAO2-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC121470802, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC121470802, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC121470802, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized protein LOC121470802 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC121470802 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC121470802 isoform X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase BRE1B-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit, transcript variant X3
protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 53 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit isoform X3
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC121470806, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC121470806, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
TLC domain containing 3B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
TLC domain containing 3B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
TLC domain containing 3B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 92 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns