Phocoena sinus isolate mPhoSin1 chromosome 21, mPhoSin1.pri, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Laurasiatheria; Cetartiodactyla; Cetacea; Odontoceti; Phocoenidae; Phocoena.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM018176.1.\nAssembly name: mPhoSin1.pri\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Vertebrate Genomes Project on\n2019/09/26. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession VOSU00000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Vertebrate Genomes Project\nAssembly Date :: 23-JUL-2019\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 5.1.1; FALCON-Unzip v. 1.0.2;\n Arrow smrtanalysis Pacbio polishing v.\n 6.0.0.47841; purge_haplotigs v. 1.0.4;\n scaff10X v. 4.1; Bionano solve DLS v.\n 3.3_10252018; Salsa HiC v. 2.2; Arrow\n smrtanalysis Pacbio polishing & gap\n filling v. 6.0.0.47841; longranger align\n v. 2.2.2; freebayes Illumina polishing v.\n 1.2.0; gEVAL manual curation v.\n 2019-07-23; VGP assembly pipeline\n individual v. 1.5\nAssembly Name :: mPhoSin1.pri\nDiploid :: Principal pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: No\nGenome Coverage :: 67.26x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel I; Illumina NovaSeq; Arima\n Genomics Hi-C; Bionano Genomics DLE-1\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Phocoena sinus Annotation Release\n 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.3\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
teneurin transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
teneurin transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
teneurin transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X2
teneurin transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X1
teneurin transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00004
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00099
uncharacterized LOC116746794, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC116746794, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 12 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 6 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 12 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 5 isoform X1
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 5 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X6
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X5
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X2
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X1
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X3
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X4
WD repeat-containing protein 17 isoform X6
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 17, transcript variant X12
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00425
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 13 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuronal membrane glycoprotein M6-a isoform X1
neuronal membrane glycoprotein M6-a isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein 596-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 705A-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 14% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase epsilon isoform X2
1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase epsilon isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 37% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 31% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CUB and sushi domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: uncharacterized protein LOC116746708
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
kelch repeat and BTB domain containing 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch repeat and BTB domain containing 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch repeat and BTB domain-containing protein 11
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X6
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10, transcript variant X9
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X3
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X5
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X4
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X1
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X2
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 isoform X6
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00156
uncharacterized LOC116746650, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC116746650, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC116746650, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC116746650, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC116746650, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC116746650, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC116746650, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X8
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X6
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X5
CLN8 transmembrane ER and ERGIC protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 25 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X5
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 596, transcript variant X2
WW and C2 domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
WW and C2 domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 8 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon CCU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
CDKN2A interacting protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDKN2A interacting protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RWD domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
RWD domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
RWD domain-containing protein 4 isoform X4
RWD domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
trafficking protein particle complex 11, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 25 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex 11, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex 11, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex 11, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex 11, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 20 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 11 isoform X4
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 11 isoform X2
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 11 isoform X3
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 11 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerophosphocholine cholinephosphodiesterase ENPP6 isoform X3
ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 6, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerophosphocholine cholinephosphodiesterase ENPP6 isoform X5
ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 12 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 6, transcript variant X4
ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 6, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerophosphocholine cholinephosphodiesterase ENPP6 isoform X4
glycerophosphocholine cholinephosphodiesterase ENPP6 isoform X2
glycerophosphocholine cholinephosphodiesterase ENPP6 isoform X1
glycerophosphocholine cholinephosphodiesterase ENPP6 isoform X6
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: signal peptidase complex subunit 2-like
interferon regulatory factor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 4 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon regulatory factor 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon regulatory factor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC116746661, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC116746661, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC116746661, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC116746661, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC116746661, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC116746661, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC116746661, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC116746661, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC116746661, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC116746661, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC116746661, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 13 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 7 long SRA reads, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X1
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X4
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X8
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X5
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X12
primase and DNA directed polymerase, transcript variant X3
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X1
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X2
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X4
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X5
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X6
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X7
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X8
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X3
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X9
DNA-directed primase/polymerase protein isoform X10
centromere protein U, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein U, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
centromere protein U, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 long SRA reads, 38 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase 1 isoform X3
long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase 1 isoform X2
long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins
helt bHLH transcription factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins
helt bHLH transcription factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins
hairy and enhancer of split-related protein HELT isoform X1
hairy and enhancer of split-related protein HELT isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 Proteins, and 48% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 6 long SRA reads, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 97, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 97 isoform X2
cilia and flagella associated protein 97, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cilia and flagella associated protein 97, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia and flagella associated protein 97, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 97 isoform X3
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 97 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
ankyrin repeat domain 37, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 37, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 37 isoform X2
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 37 isoform X1
UFM1 specific peptidase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
UFM1 specific peptidase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 21 C4orf47 homolog, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 21 C4orf47 homolog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 21 C4orf47 homolog, transcript variant X1
chromosome 21 C4orf47 homolog, transcript variant X3
chromosome 21 C4orf47 homolog, transcript variant X5
UPF0602 protein C4orf47 homolog isoform X2
UPF0602 protein C4orf47 homolog isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 110
PDZ and LIM domain 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
PDZ and LIM domain 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
PDZ and LIM domain 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X8
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X6
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X7
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X5
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X9
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
toll like receptor 3, transcript variant X2
toll like receptor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 44 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 149 member A
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 16 Proteins, and 14% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 34 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 46 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 112 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 125 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 119 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
FAT atypical cadherin 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC116746868, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC116746868, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIML2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIML1
transfer RNA glycine (anticodon CCC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC116746722, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC116746722, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-acylsphingosine amidohydrolase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
N-acylsphingosine amidohydrolase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 15 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-acylsphingosine amidohydrolase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X30
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 35 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X29
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X3
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X32
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X27
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X31
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X26
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X30
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X23
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X29
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X25
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X16
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X15
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X7
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X14
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X6
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X3
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X12
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X9
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X4
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X1
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X19
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X28
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X13
pericentriolar material 1, transcript variant X5
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X24
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X21
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X20
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X22
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X19
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X18
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X11
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X10
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X8
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X13
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X5
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X2
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X12
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X9
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X4
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X1
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X28
pericentriolar material 1 protein isoform X17
fibrinogen like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
fibrinogen like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 13 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 homolog
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00619
microtubule associated scaffold protein 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1
platelet derived growth factor receptor like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
platelet derived growth factor receptor like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 8 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
platelet-derived growth factor receptor-like protein isoform X1
platelet-derived growth factor receptor-like protein isoform X2
solute carrier family 7 member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 7 member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
solute carrier family 7 member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
cationic amino acid transporter 2 isoform X1
cationic amino acid transporter 2 isoform X2
myotubularin related protein 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 15 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 7 isoform X1
myotubularin-related protein 7 isoform X2
VPS37A subunit of ESCRT-I, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
VPS37A subunit of ESCRT-I, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 37A isoform X1
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 37A isoform X2
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 15 long SRA reads, 25 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 25 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 25 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 25 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 7
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial calcium uptake family member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial calcium uptake family member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial calcium uptake family member 3, transcript variant X2
calcium uptake protein 3, mitochondrial isoform X2
calcium uptake protein 3, mitochondrial isoform X1
mitochondrial calcium uptake family member 3, transcript variant X4
calcium uptake protein 3, mitochondrial isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 15 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 37% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage scavenger receptor 1, transcript variant X3
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X1
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X2
macrophage scavenger receptor types I and II isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
tumor suppressor candidate 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 7 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor suppressor candidate 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tumor suppressor candidate 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 12% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00157
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 51 long SRA reads, 27 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: rho GTPase-activating protein 7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and RING finger protein 1 isoform X1
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and RING finger protein 1 isoform X2
PEAK1 related, kinase-activating pseudokinase 1, transcript variant X2
PEAK1 related, kinase-activating pseudokinase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
inactive tyrosine-protein kinase PRAG1 isoform X1
inactive tyrosine-protein kinase PRAG1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
malignant fibrous histiocytoma amplified sequence 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
malignant fibrous histiocytoma amplified sequence 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
malignant fibrous histiocytoma-amplified sequence 1 isoform X1
malignant fibrous histiocytoma-amplified sequence 1 isoform X2
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00408
uncharacterized LOC116746832, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC116746832, transcript variant X1
exoribonuclease 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
exoribonuclease 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 31% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 30 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase tankyrase-1
dual specificity phosphatase 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity protein phosphatase 4 isoform X2
dual specificity protein phosphatase 4 isoform X1
transfer RNA tryptophan (anticodon CCA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
store-operated calcium entry associated regulatory factor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
store-operated calcium entry-associated regulatory factor
leptin receptor overlapping transcript like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 10 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
leptin receptor overlapping transcript-like 1
membrane bound O-acyltransferase domain containing 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X5
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, mRNA processing factor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X5
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X4
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X2
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X3
RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
general transcription factor IIE subunit 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription initiation factor IIE subunit beta isoform X2
general transcription factor IIE subunit 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 40% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transcription initiation factor IIE subunit beta isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain protein 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain protein 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBX domain-containing protein 8 isoform X1
UBX domain-containing protein 8 isoform X2
protein phosphatase 2 catalytic subunit beta
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 10 long SRA reads, 55 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit beta isoform
testis expressed 15, meiosis and synapsis associated
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 39% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: testis-expressed protein 15
purine rich element binding protein G, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
purine-rich element-binding protein gamma isoform X2
purine rich element binding protein G, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
purine-rich element-binding protein gamma isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: Werner syndrome ATP-dependent helicase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X10
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 12% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: transcription factor Spi-C-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X5
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X4
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X6
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X8
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X9
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X12
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X3
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
pro-neuregulin-1, membrane-bound isoform isoform X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
fucosyltransferase 10, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
fucosyltransferase 10, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
alpha-(1,3)-fucosyltransferase 10 isoform X4
alpha-(1,3)-fucosyltransferase 10 isoform X3
fucosyltransferase 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
fucosyltransferase 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
alpha-(1,3)-fucosyltransferase 10 isoform X1
fucosyltransferase 10, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-(1,3)-fucosyltransferase 10 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 15% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 42 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 54% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
TELO2 interacting protein 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
TELO2 interacting protein 2, transcript variant X5
TELO2 interacting protein 2, transcript variant X6
TELO2 interacting protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
TELO2 interacting protein 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
TELO2 interacting protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
TELO2 interacting protein 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01210
ring finger protein 122, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 122, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 26, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 26, transcript variant X1
dual specificity phosphatase 26, transcript variant X3
dual specificity phosphatase 26, transcript variant X2
dual specificity protein phosphatase 26 isoform X3
dual specificity protein phosphatase 26 isoform X1
dual specificity protein phosphatase 26 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC116746815, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC116746815, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 26% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 19% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily U member 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 3 codons; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein 703
ER lipid raft associated 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ER lipid raft associated 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ER lipid raft associated 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
BRF2 RNA polymerase III transcription initiation factor subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 8 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor IIIB 50 kDa subunit
RAB11 family interacting protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB11 family interacting protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
rab11 family-interacting protein 1 isoform X2
rab11 family-interacting protein 1 isoform X1
glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1 like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 Proteins, and 8% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
putative aspartate aminotransferase, cytoplasmic 2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 4 long SRA reads, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X1
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X2
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X3
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X7
ASH2 like, histone lysine methyltransferase complex subunit, transcript variant X8
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X4
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X5
set1/Ash2 histone methyltransferase complex subunit ASH2 isoform X6
steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC116746770, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC116746770, transcript variant X1
LSM1 homolog, mRNA degradation associated
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm1
BAG cochaperone 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
BAG cochaperone 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
BAG cochaperone 4, transcript variant X2
BAG family molecular chaperone regulator 4 isoform X1
BAG family molecular chaperone regulator 4 isoform X3
BAG family molecular chaperone regulator 4 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DDHD domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DDHD domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X1
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid phosphatase 5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X3
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X5
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X4
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X1
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD3 isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
leucine zipper and EF-hand containing transmembrane protein 2
LETM1 domain-containing protein LETM2, mitochondrial
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 8 long SRA reads, 35 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: fibroblast growth factor receptor 1
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X4
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X1
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X2
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X4
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X5
transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 1 isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC116746860, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC116746860, transcript variant X1
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 18 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 21 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing A2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 2 isoform X1
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 2 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; substituted 3 bases at 3 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: serine protease HTRA4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 40 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 8 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 29 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 9 isoform X1
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 9 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 32
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 5-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 Proteins
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 2
A disintegrin and metallopeptidase domain 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 59% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 18-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X1
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X5
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X1
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X3
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X4
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X2
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X6
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X7
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X3
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X2
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 isoform X5
transcriptional and immune response regulator
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
GINS complex subunit 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
GINS complex subunit 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
GINS complex subunit 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA replication complex GINS protein SLD5
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 mRNAs, 16 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 14 long SRA reads, 21 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4 isoform X1
glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
lysine acetyltransferase 6A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine acetyltransferase 6A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone acetyltransferase KAT6A isoform X2
histone acetyltransferase KAT6A isoform X1
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
plasminogen activator, tissue type, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
plasminogen activator, tissue type, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 6 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 11 long SRA reads, 28 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 11 long SRA reads, 28 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta, transcript variant X5
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta isoform X2
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta isoform X1
inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta isoform X3
DNA polymerase beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA polymerase beta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA polymerase beta, transcript variant X1
dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 4
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: dickkopf-related protein 4
voltage dependent anion channel 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 6 long SRA reads, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage dependent anion channel 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 5 long SRA reads, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage dependent anion channel 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 5 long SRA reads, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 2-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 2-like
voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cholinergic receptor nicotinic beta 3 subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 30 Proteins
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit beta-3
cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 6 subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 10% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 6 subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 10% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-6 isoform X2
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-6 isoform X1
THAP domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
THAP domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
THAP domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
THAP domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
THAP domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
THAP domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
THAP domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
THAP domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
THAP domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
THAP domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X5
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 170, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF170 isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF170 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF170 isoform X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein Hook homolog 3
farnesyltransferase, CAAX box, alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 6 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
farnesyltransferase, CAAX box, alpha, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein farnesyltransferase/geranylgeranyltransferase type-1 subunit alpha isoform X1
protein farnesyltransferase/geranylgeranyltransferase type-1 subunit alpha isoform X2
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein O-mannose kinase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
heparan-alpha-glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 30 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 4 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X4
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X2
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X3
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X1
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X5
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X9
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X8
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X7
integrator complex subunit 10, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 10 isoform X6
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 20 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X6
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, transcript variant X4
chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1
SH2 domain containing 4A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain containing 4A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain containing 4A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain containing 4A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain containing 4A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 11% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon CUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
arylamine N-acetyltransferase 1, transcript variant X7
arylamine N-acetyltransferase 1, transcript variant X6
arylamine N-acetyltransferase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 mRNAs, 5 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
arylamine N-acetyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 mRNAs, 10 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
arylamine N-acetyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 mRNAs, 3 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
arylamine N-acetyltransferase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
arylamine N-acetyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 24 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns