Stegostoma fasciatum isolate 6-17 chromosome 35, sSteFas1.1, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Chondrichthyes; Elasmobranchii; Galeomorphii; Galeoidea; Orectolobiformes; Stegostomatidae; Stegostoma.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM039261.1.\nAssembly name: sSteFas1.1\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Squalomix on 2022/02/17. The\noriginal whole-genome shotgun project has the accession\nJAFIRC000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Squalomix\nAssembly Date :: 22-FEB-2021\nAssembly Method :: Platanus v. 1.2.4; P_RNA_scaffolder v.\n commit 7941e0f on May 30, at github;\n 3D-DNA v. 180922\nAssembly Name :: sSteFas1.1\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 95.8x\nSequencing Technology :: Illumina HiSeq\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Stegostoma fasciatum Annotation\n Release 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 9.0\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
BOLA class I histocompatibility antigen, alpha chain BL3-7-like
COORDINATES: polyA evidence [ECO:0006239]
ABC-type oligopeptide transporter ABCB9-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
proteasome subunit beta type-9-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
proteasome subunit beta type-9-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transporter 1, ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B (MDR/TAP)
major histocompatibility complex class I-related gene protein-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
major histocompatibility complex class I-related gene protein-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
major histocompatibility complex class I-related gene protein-like isoform X2
major histocompatibility complex class I-related gene protein-like isoform X1
putative nuclease HARBI1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative nuclease HARBI1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 271-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger protein 271-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 271-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 271-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
H-2 class I histocompatibility antigen, Q9 alpha chain-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 102 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
H-2 class I histocompatibility antigen, Q9 alpha chain-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 89 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
H-2 class I histocompatibility antigen, Q9 alpha chain-like, transcript variant X6
H-2 class I histocompatibility antigen, Q9 alpha chain-like, transcript variant X2
H-2 class I histocompatibility antigen, Q9 alpha chain-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 102 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
H-2 class I histocompatibility antigen, Q9 alpha chain-like, transcript variant X3
H-2 class I histocompatibility antigen, Q9 alpha chain-like isoform X3
major histocompatibility complex class I-related gene protein-like isoform X4
zinc finger protein 271-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 271-like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 271-like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 271-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 239-like, transcript variant X2
zinc finger protein 239-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 239-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 91-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 91-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein 62 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
sex peptide receptor-like, transcript variant X1
sex peptide receptor-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 95 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
gastrula zinc finger protein XlCGF71.1-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 239-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 120 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
gastrula zinc finger protein XlCGF71.1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
gastrula zinc finger protein XlCGF71.1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
gastrula zinc finger protein XlCGF71.1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 70 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 104 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 130 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 130 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 62 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 138 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 121 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 121 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 121 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 121 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 188 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 189 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 283 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: uncharacterized protein LOC125467699
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 90 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 78 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
gastrula zinc finger protein XlCGF71.1-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 148 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00003
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 176 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 154 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 131 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 131 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 131 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 264 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 188 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 188 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 188 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 188 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 138 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 116 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 110 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC125446462, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC125446462, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
H-2 class II histocompatibility antigen, E-S beta chain-like
RLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DP alpha-1 chain-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 39% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: neoverrucotoxin subunit alpha-like
bromodomain-containing protein 2-like, transcript variant X4
bromodomain-containing protein 2-like, transcript variant X2
bromodomain-containing protein 2-like, transcript variant X3
bromodomain-containing protein 2-like, transcript variant X1
bromodomain-containing protein 2-like isoform X1
bromodomain-containing protein 2-like isoform X2
bromodomain-containing protein 2-like isoform X3
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01290
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-2-microglobulin-like, transcript variant X2
beta-2-microglobulin-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 288 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain-like, transcript variant X2
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain-like isoform X4
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain-like isoform X1
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain-like isoform X2
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain-like isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger protein 271-like, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 347 Proteins, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC125446648, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC125446648, transcript variant X1
H-2 class I histocompatibility antigen, Q10 alpha chain-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 73 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA proline (anticodon UGG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA serine (anticodon CGA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc-binding protein A33-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc-binding protein A33-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
major histocompatibility complex class I-related gene protein-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 14% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc-binding protein A33-like isoform X1
zinc-binding protein A33-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon CUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA asparagine (anticodon GUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA histidin (anticodon GUG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
gastrula zinc finger protein XlCGF8.2DB-like
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon UUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA serine (anticodon AGA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA aspartic acid (anticodon GUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA serine (anticodon UGA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
zinc finger protein ZFP2-like, transcript variant X1
zinc finger protein ZFP2-like, transcript variant X2
zinc finger protein ZFP2-like, transcript variant X3
probable G-protein coupled receptor 139, transcript variant X2
probable G-protein coupled receptor 139 isoform X2
probable G-protein coupled receptor 139, transcript variant X1
probable G-protein coupled receptor 139 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM69-like isoform X2
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1-like isoform X1
hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 8, transcript variant X1
hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 8, transcript variant X3
hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 8, transcript variant X4
estradiol 17-beta-dehydrogenase 8 isoform X3
estradiol 17-beta-dehydrogenase 8 isoform X1
estradiol 17-beta-dehydrogenase 8 isoform X4
hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 8, transcript variant X2
estradiol 17-beta-dehydrogenase 8 isoform X2
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 10, transcript variant X2
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 10, transcript variant X3
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 10, transcript variant X1
retinoic acid receptor RXR-alpha-B-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoic acid receptor RXR-alpha-B-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoic acid receptor RXR-alpha-B-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoic acid receptor RXR-alpha-B-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoic acid receptor RXR-beta-A-like isoform X1
retinoic acid receptor RXR-alpha-B-like isoform X4
retinoic acid receptor RXR-alpha-A-like isoform X2
retinoic acid receptor RXR-alpha-B-like isoform X5
retinoic acid receptor RXR-alpha-B-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoic acid receptor RXR-beta-A-like isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 12% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class C, transcript variant X3
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class C, transcript variant X2
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class C, transcript variant X1
phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase subunit C isoform X3
phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase subunit C isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase subunit C isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RING2-A-like, transcript variant X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RING2-A-like, transcript variant X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RING2-A-like, transcript variant X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RING2-B-like isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RING2-A-like isoform X2
muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 Proteins, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 68 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91 Proteins, and 36% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 Proteins, and 40% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 62 Proteins, and 9% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 Proteins, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 189 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 179 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 Proteins, and 26% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 Proteins, and 29% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 439 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase BRE1A-like, transcript variant X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase BRE1A-like, transcript variant X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase BRE1A-like isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase BRE1A-like isoform X2
complement C4-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement C4-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement C4-like, transcript variant X2
complement C4-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like isoform X1
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like isoform X3
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like isoform X2
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like isoform X4
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
radiation-inducible immediate-early gene IEX-1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc-binding protein A33-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc-binding protein A33-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc-binding protein A33-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 487 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 224 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 501 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: cytochrome P450 2K1-like
discoidin domain-containing receptor 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein C6orf136 homolog
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family F (GCN20), member 1, transcript variant X1
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family F (GCN20), member 1, transcript variant X2
ATP-binding cassette sub-family F member 1 isoform X1
ATP-binding cassette sub-family F member 1 isoform X2
28S ribosomal protein S18b, mitochondrial
protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 10, transcript variant X2
protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 10, transcript variant X1
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 10
alpha tubulin acetyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
alpha tubulin acetyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
alpha-tubulin N-acetyltransferase 1 isoform X2
alpha-tubulin N-acetyltransferase 1 isoform X1
guanine nucleotide binding protein-like 1
guanine nucleotide-binding protein-like 1
gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor, 1b, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor, 1b, transcript variant X3
gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor, 1b, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
general transcription factor IIH, polypeptide 4, transcript variant X1
general transcription factor IIH, polypeptide 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIH, polypeptide 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
general transcription factor IIH, polypeptide 4, transcript variant X2
general transcription factor IIH subunit 4
RNA-binding protein 4B-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4B-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4B-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4B-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4B-like, transcript variant X6
RNA-binding protein 4B-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4B-like, transcript variant X4
protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 2-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase b, transcript variant X3
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 2-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase b, transcript variant X2
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 2-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase b, transcript variant X1
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 2-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase b, transcript variant X4
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 2-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase b, transcript variant X6
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 2-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase b, transcript variant X5
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 2-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase b isoform X1
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 2-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase b isoform X2
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 2-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase b isoform X3
RNA polymerase I subunit H, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA polymerase I subunit H, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA-directed RNA polymerase I subunit RPA12 isoform X1
DNA-directed RNA polymerase I subunit RPA12 isoform X2
DEAH (Asp-Glu-Ala-His) box polypeptide 16, transcript variant X2
DEAH (Asp-Glu-Ala-His) box polypeptide 16, transcript variant X3
DEAH (Asp-Glu-Ala-His) box polypeptide 16, transcript variant X1
pre-mRNA-splicing factor ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 105-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4B-like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4B-like, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAM family member 5-like, transcript variant X1
SLAM family member 5-like, transcript variant X2
SLAM family member 5-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 70 Proteins, and 35% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calcium homeostasis modulator protein 5-like, transcript variant X1
calcium homeostasis modulator protein 5-like, transcript variant X2
calcium homeostasis modulator protein 5-like isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC125446605 isoform X2
calcium homeostasis modulator protein-like, transcript variant X2
calcium homeostasis modulator protein-like, transcript variant X1
calcium homeostasis modulator protein-like
calcium homeostasis modulator protein 5-like
calcium homeostasis modulator protein 6-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC125446609, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC125446609, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule-like, transcript variant X3
hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule-like, transcript variant X1
hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule-like, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC125446599 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC125446599 isoform X2
hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule-like isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC125446596, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC125446596, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC125446596 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC125446596 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC125446596, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC125446596, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized protein LOC125446596 isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC125446596, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized protein LOC125446596 isoform X4
uncharacterized protein LOC125446596 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CD166 antigen-like, transcript variant X1
CD166 antigen-like, transcript variant X2
CD166 antigen-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
PHD finger protein 1-like, transcript variant X1
PHD finger protein 1-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
PHD finger protein 1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X1
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X6
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X17
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X4
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X5
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X11
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X8
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X10
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X9
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X15
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like isoform X5
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like isoform X12
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like isoform X3
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like isoform X2
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like isoform X1
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like isoform X4
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like isoform X6
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like isoform X10
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 22-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 22-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 22-like
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 43-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 43-like, transcript variant X1
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 43-like
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X14
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like isoform X9
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like isoform X11
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like isoform X7
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP-like isoform X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc-binding protein A33-like isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule-like, transcript variant X4
hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule-like isoform X4
hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule-like isoform X2
hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule-like isoform X1
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 2-like isoform X1
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 2-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
probable G-protein coupled receptor 139, transcript variant X3
neuropeptides capa receptor-like isoform X2
neuropeptides capa receptor-like isoform X3
vesicle-trafficking protein SEC22b-B-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibrous sheath CABYR-binding protein-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibrous sheath CABYR-binding protein-like, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC125467682 isoform X1
fibrous sheath CABYR-binding protein-like isoform X2
neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1-like
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM39-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM39-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM39-like isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM39-like isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC125467681, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC125467681, transcript variant X2
protein FAM102A-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein FAM102A-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like, transcript variant X7
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like, transcript variant X2
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like, transcript variant X8
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like, transcript variant X3
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like, transcript variant X1
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like, transcript variant X6
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like, transcript variant X4
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like, transcript variant X5
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like isoform X6
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like isoform X8
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like isoform X5
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like isoform X7
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like isoform X3
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like isoform X4
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like isoform X2
large proline-rich protein BAG6-like isoform X1
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 39B, transcript variant X3
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 39B, transcript variant X1
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 39B, transcript variant X2
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 39B, transcript variant X5
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 39B, transcript variant X4
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 39B
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC125446557, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC125446557, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC125446557, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC125446557, transcript variant X4
chromosome 35 C6orf47 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 35 C6orf47 homolog, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein C6orf47 homolog isoform X1
uncharacterized protein C6orf47 homolog isoform X2
protein PRRC2C-like, transcript variant X2
protein PRRC2C-like, transcript variant X10
protein PRRC2C-like, transcript variant X9
protein PRRC2C-like, transcript variant X5
protein PRRC2C-like, transcript variant X7
protein PRRC2C-like, transcript variant X3
protein PRRC2C-like, transcript variant X4
protein PRRC2C-like, transcript variant X12
protein PRRC2C-like, transcript variant X11
protein PRRC2C-like, transcript variant X8
protein PRRC2C-like, transcript variant X6
protein PRRC2C-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2
N(G),N(G)-dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2
CCN family member 1-like, transcript variant X1
CCN family member 1-like, transcript variant X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2-like, transcript variant X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2-like, transcript variant X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2-like isoform X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2-like isoform X1
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 12-like, transcript variant X4
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 12-like, transcript variant X1
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 12-like isoform X1
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 12-like, transcript variant X6
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 12-like, transcript variant X5
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 12-like, transcript variant X3
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 12-like, transcript variant X2
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 12-like isoform X2
complement factor B-like, transcript variant X2
complement factor B-like, transcript variant X1
SKI2 homolog, superkiller viralicidic activity 2-like
negative elongation factor complex member E
N-acetyllactosaminide alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
N-acetyllactosaminide alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-acetyllactosaminide alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase-like, transcript variant X3
N-acetyllactosaminide alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase-like isoform X1
N-acetyllactosaminide alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA glycine (anticodon GCC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
gastrula zinc finger protein XlCGF57.1-like
zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 17, transcript variant X2
zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 17, transcript variant X1
zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 17, transcript variant X4
zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 17, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 17, transcript variant X5
zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 17, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 62 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cyclic AMP-dependent transcription factor ATF-6 beta
transfer RNA lysine (anticodon UUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: steroid 21-hydroxylase-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
histone H3-like centromeric protein A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 350 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone H3-like centromeric protein A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 350 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone H3-like centromeric protein A, transcript variant X3
histone H3-like centromeric protein A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 350 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2-like, transcript variant X2
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2-like, transcript variant X1
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2-like, transcript variant X4
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2-like, transcript variant X6
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2-like, transcript variant X3
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2-like isoform X2
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A2-like isoform X1
butyrophilin subfamily 3 member A3-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 3 member A3-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 3 member A3-like, transcript variant X3
butyrophilin subfamily 3 member A3-like, transcript variant X2
butyrophilin subfamily 3 member A1-like isoform X1
butyrophilin subfamily 3 member A3-like isoform X2
butyrophilin subfamily 3 member A3-like, transcript variant X5
butyrophilin subfamily 3 member A1-like isoform X3
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1-like, transcript variant X3
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1-like isoform X2
erythroid membrane-associated protein-like isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger protein 239-like, transcript variant X7
zinc finger protein 239-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 239-like, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC125446549, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC125446549, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC125446549, transcript variant X2
palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 2b, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 2b, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 2b, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
carnitine O-acetyltransferase-like, transcript variant X4
carnitine O-acetyltransferase-like, transcript variant X2
carnitine O-acetyltransferase-like, transcript variant X1
carnitine O-acetyltransferase-like, transcript variant X3
carnitine O-acetyltransferase-like isoform X1
carnitine O-acetyltransferase-like isoform X2
carnitine O-acetyltransferase-like isoform X3
carnitine O-acetyltransferase-like isoform X4
carnitine O-acetyltransferase-like, transcript variant X5
carnitine O-acetyltransferase-like isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline-rich transmembrane protein 1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline-rich transmembrane protein 1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline-rich transmembrane protein 1-like isoform X1
proline-rich transmembrane protein 1-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 203 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 268, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 15-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 15-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 15-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
lymphotoxin-beta-like, transcript variant X2
lymphotoxin-beta-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
lymphotoxin-beta-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 19% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G-protein signaling 3-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
regulator of G-protein signaling 3-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC125467677, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC125467677, transcript variant X1
serine protease FAM111A-like, transcript variant X1
serine protease FAM111A-like, transcript variant X2
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1, transcript variant X1
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1, transcript variant X2
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1, transcript variant X3
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1, transcript variant X4
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1, transcript variant X7
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1 isoform X1
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1 isoform X2
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1 isoform X3
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1 isoform X4
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1 isoform X6
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1, transcript variant X6
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1, transcript variant X5
mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transcription factor 19 (SC1), like, transcript variant X3
transcription factor 19 (SC1), like, transcript variant X1
transcription factor 19 (SC1), like, transcript variant X2
neural proliferation differentiation and control protein 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
heat shock 70 kDa protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 736 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
heat shock 70 kDa protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock 70 kDa protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 734 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor-like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
TNF receptor-associated factor 2-like, transcript variant X2
TNF receptor-associated factor 2-like, transcript variant X1
abhydrolase domain containing 16A, phospholipase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
suppressor APC domain-containing protein 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 328 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 332 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 330 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 254 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 352 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 311 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 324 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 477 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 251 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 174 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 52 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized WD repeat-containing protein all2124-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized WD repeat-containing protein all2124-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized WD repeat-containing protein all2124-like, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized WD repeat-containing protein all2124-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized WD repeat-containing protein all2124-like, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized WD repeat-containing protein all2124-like
nucleoside diphosphate kinase homolog 5-like, transcript variant X1
nucleoside diphosphate kinase homolog 5-like, transcript variant X4
nucleoside diphosphate kinase homolog 5-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleoside diphosphate kinase homolog 5-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleoside diphosphate kinase homolog 5-like isoform X2
nucleoside diphosphate kinase homolog 5-like isoform X3
nucleoside diphosphate kinase homolog 5-like isoform X1
excision repair cross-complementation group 6-like, transcript variant X1
DNA excision repair protein ERCC-6-like isoform X1
excision repair cross-complementation group 6-like, transcript variant X2
DNA excision repair protein ERCC-6-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member C1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member C1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member C1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
kinesin family member C1, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized protein C11orf98 homolog
death-domain associated protein, transcript variant X3
death-domain associated protein, transcript variant X2
death-domain associated protein, transcript variant X1
death domain-associated protein 6 isoform X2
death domain-associated protein 6 isoform X1
death domain-associated protein 6 isoform X3
vegetative incompatibility protein HET-E-1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
VPS52 subunit of GARP complex, transcript variant X1
VPS52 subunit of GARP complex, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 52 homolog isoform X1
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 52 homolog isoform X2
G patch domain and ankyrin repeat-containing protein 1
chloride intracellular channel protein 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 7-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 7-like isoform X2
carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 7-like, transcript variant X1
carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 7-like isoform X1
carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 20-like, transcript variant X1
carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 20-like, transcript variant X2
carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 20-like isoform X1
carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 20-like isoform X2