Microcebus murinus isolate mixed chromosome 28, Mmur_3.0, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Euarchontoglires; Primates; Strepsirrhini; Lemuriformes; Cheirogaleidae; Microcebus.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM007688.1.\nAssembly name: Mmur_3.0\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Broad Institute on\n2017/02/06. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession ABDC00000000.3.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Broad Institute\nAssembly Date :: MAY-2015\nAssembly Method :: AllPathsLG v. 41070; Atlas Link v. 1.0;\n Atlas GapFill v. 2.0; PBJelly2 v. 14.9.9;\n Lachesis v. shendurelab-LACHESIS-2151de9;\n BioNano IrysSolve v. 2.1\nPolishing Method :: Pilon v 1.18\nAssembly Name :: Mmur_3.0\nGenome Coverage :: 221.6x\nSequencing Technology :: Illumina; PacBio RS; PacBio RSII\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Version :: Microcebus murinus Annotation\n Release 101\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 7.3\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
three separate animals were used in this assembly: #8(Reference animal), 1886F (Citronella), 7006M (Rosehip)
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 42 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 45 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger protein 317, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 317, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 317, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 Proteins, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 28% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
inactive ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 53-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 76 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 75 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105883325, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105883325, transcript variant X1
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 264 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 265 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyltransferase like 14, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 107 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyltransferase like 14, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyltransferase like 14, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
N6-adenosine-methyltransferase subunit METTL14 isoform X2
N6-adenosine-methyltransferase subunit METTL14 isoform X1
N6-adenosine-methyltransferase subunit METTL14 isoform X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 123 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
N-deacetylase and N-sulfotransferase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-deacetylase and N-sulfotransferase 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
N-deacetylase and N-sulfotransferase 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
bifunctional heparan sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 3 isoform X1
bifunctional heparan sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 3 isoform X3
N-deacetylase and N-sulfotransferase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
bifunctional heparan sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 3 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC105883320, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC105883320, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC105883320, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105883320, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105883320, transcript variant X3
ER membrane protein complex subunit 3 pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC105883320, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC105883320, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC105883320, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC105883320, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC105883320, transcript variant X9
translocation associated membrane protein 1-like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
translocating chain-associated membrane protein 1-like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
bifunctional heparan sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 4
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 105 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X5
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X4
2-hydroxyacylsphingosine 1-beta-galactosyltransferase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 244 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 156 ESTs, 25 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 242 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 154 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 154 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 154 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 242 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 57 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 242 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 243 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 257 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 249 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 263 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X7
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X12
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X1
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X5
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X10
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X3
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X8
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X11
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X2
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X6
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X4
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X9
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 253 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 255 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 266 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 261 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 255 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 257 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 258 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 257 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 260 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 262 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 266 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 259 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 263 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 256 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 264 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 263 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 264 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 269 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 268 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 246 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
La ribonucleoprotein domain family member 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 107 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein domain family member 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 113 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger GRF-type containing 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger GRF-type containing 1, transcript variant X4
zinc finger GRF-type containing 1, transcript variant X1
zinc finger GRF-type containing 1, transcript variant X3
zinc finger GRF-type containing 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger GRF-type containing 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger GRF-type containing 1, transcript variant X9
zinc finger GRF-type containing 1, transcript variant X2
zinc finger GRF-type containing 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger GRF-type containing 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 46 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger GRF-type containing 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger GRF-type containing 1, transcript variant X11
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 80 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tRNA modification GTPase GTPBP3, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DET1 and DDB1 associated 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
DET1 and DDB1 associated 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 83 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
DET1 and DDB1 associated 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DET1 and DDB1 associated 1, transcript variant X1
DET1 and DDB1 associated 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DET1 and DDB1 associated 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
DET1- and DDB1-associated protein 1 isoform X2
DET1- and DDB1-associated protein 1 isoform X1
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L34, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L34, transcript variant X2
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L34, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L34, transcript variant X1
39S ribosomal protein L34, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 41 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and LEM domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ankyrin repeat and LEM domain-containing protein 1
BRISC and BRCA1 A complex member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
BRISC and BRCA1 A complex member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
BRISC and BRCA1 A complex member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
BRISC and BRCA1 A complex member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 84 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
BRISC and BRCA1-A complex member 1 isoform X2
BRISC and BRCA1-A complex member 1 isoform X1
USH1 protein network component harmonin binding protein 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: Usher syndrome type-1C protein-binding protein 1
nuclear receptor subfamily 2 group F member 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 138 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
occludin/ELL domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 108 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: unconventional myosin-IXb
HAUS augmin-like complex subunit 8, transcript variant X1
HAUS augmin-like complex subunit 8, transcript variant X2
HAUS augmin-like complex subunit 8 isoform X1
HAUS augmin-like complex subunit 8 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: HAUS augmin-like complex subunit 8
excitatory amino acid transporter 4-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: excitatory amino acid transporter 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 105
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 70 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; substituted 3 bases at 3 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: rho GTPase-activating protein SYDE1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 152 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 112 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 3
uncharacterized LOC105867941, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105867941, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC105867941 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC105867941 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 328 ESTs, 26 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 233 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
A-kinase anchoring protein 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
A-kinase anchoring protein 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
A-kinase anchoring protein 8, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
A-kinase anchoring protein 8, transcript variant X3
A-kinase anchoring protein 8 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 1003 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
A-kinase anchor protein 8-like isoform X1
A-kinase anchoring protein 8 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 854 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
A-kinase anchor protein 8-like isoform X2
widely interspaced zinc finger motifs, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 215 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
widely interspaced zinc finger motifs, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 212 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
widely interspaced zinc finger motifs, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 215 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
widely interspaced zinc finger motifs, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 214 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
widely interspaced zinc finger motifs, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 212 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
widely interspaced zinc finger motifs, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 214 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: RAS protein activator like-3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
docosahexaenoic acid omega-hydroxylase CYP4F3-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 72 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
docosahexaenoic acid omega-hydroxylase CYP4F3-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
docosahexaenoic acid omega-hydroxylase CYP4F3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 70 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
phylloquinone omega-hydroxylase CYP4F2-like isoform X1
docosahexaenoic acid omega-hydroxylase CYP4F3-like isoform X2
phylloquinone omega-hydroxylase CYP4F2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 57 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
phylloquinone omega-hydroxylase CYP4F2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 57 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
phylloquinone omega-hydroxylase CYP4F2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 11 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
phylloquinone omega-hydroxylase CYP4F2-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 84 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
phylloquinone omega-hydroxylase CYP4F2-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 84 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
phylloquinone omega-hydroxylase CYP4F2-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 88 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
docosahexaenoic acid omega-hydroxylase CYP4F3-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 34% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 69 Proteins, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
docosahexaenoic acid omega-hydroxylase CYP4F3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, 86 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
docosahexaenoic acid omega-hydroxylase CYP4F3, transcript variant X2
docosahexaenoic acid omega-hydroxylase CYP4F3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 72 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
docosahexaenoic acid omega-hydroxylase CYP4F3 isoform X1
docosahexaenoic acid omega-hydroxylase CYP4F3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 ESTs, 26 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 113 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 300 ESTs, 27 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 228 ESTs, 27 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 412 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: hematopoietic SH2 domain-containing protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF interacting protein with forkhead associated domain, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF interacting protein with forkhead associated domain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF interacting protein with forkhead associated domain, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF-interacting protein with FHA domain-containing protein A
adaptor related protein complex 1 associated regulatory protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 56 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
adaptor related protein complex 1 associated regulatory protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 63 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
AP-1 complex-associated regulatory protein isoform X2
AP-1 complex-associated regulatory protein isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105872344, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105872344, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105872344, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 26% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 57 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 mRNAs, 87 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 152 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: pro-epidermal growth factor
leucine rich repeat, Ig-like and transmembrane domains 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat, Ig-like and transmembrane domains 3, transcript variant X1
leucine-rich repeat, immunoglobulin-like domain and transmembrane domain-containing protein 3
retinal pigment epithelium-derived rhodopsin homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinal pigment epithelium-derived rhodopsin homolog, transcript variant X2
visual pigment-like receptor peropsin isoform X1
visual pigment-like receptor peropsin isoform X2
GAR1 ribonucleoprotein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 66 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
GAR1 ribonucleoprotein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 62 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
GAR1 ribonucleoprotein, transcript variant X4
GAR1 ribonucleoprotein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 62 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
H/ACA ribonucleoprotein complex subunit 1 isoform X1
H/ACA ribonucleoprotein complex subunit 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement factor I, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
complement factor I, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial calcium uniporter dominant negative beta subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 38 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial calcium uniporter dominant negative beta subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 38 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial calcium uniporter dominant negative beta subunit, transcript variant X2
calcium uniporter regulatory subunit MCUb, mitochondrial isoform X1
calcium uniporter regulatory subunit MCUb, mitochondrial isoform X2
calcium uniporter regulatory subunit MCUb, mitochondrial isoform X3
SEC24 homolog B, COPII coat complex component
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 230 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein transport protein Sec24B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 15 Proteins, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 226 ESTs, 51 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X10
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X12
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X13
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X3
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X6
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X5
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X11
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X8
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X15
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X20
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X7
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X14
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X2
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC105872320, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105872320, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105872320, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor susceptibility gene 101 protein pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 44 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC105872319, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105872319, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105872319, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC105872319, transcript variant X2
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X18
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X19
ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 62 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase isoform X1
ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase isoform X2
ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase isoform X3
oligosaccharyltransferase complex non-catalytic subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 88 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
oligosaccharyltransferase complex non-catalytic subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 568 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
oligosaccharyltransferase complex subunit OSTC isoform X2
oligosaccharyltransferase complex subunit OSTC isoform X1
ribosomal protein L34, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 638 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein L34, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 548 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein L34, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 550 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105872327, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105872327, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs
lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 122 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 136 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 127 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 isoform X1
lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 isoform X3
lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 isoform X2
hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 337 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase, transcript variant X1
hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase, mitochondrial isoform X3
hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase, mitochondrial isoform X4
hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase, mitochondrial isoform X1
hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase, mitochondrial isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC105872333, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105872333, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
sphingomyelin synthase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
sphingomyelin synthase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
sphingomyelin synthase 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
sphingomyelin synthase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sphingomyelin synthase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylcholine:ceramide cholinephosphotransferase 2
3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 360 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 526 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 526 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 mRNAs, 562 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 494 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
bifunctional 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1 isoform X1
bifunctional 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1 isoform X2
bifunctional 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1 isoform X5
bifunctional 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1 isoform X4
3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 223 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
bifunctional 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC105879068, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105879068, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 mRNAs, 53 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC109730122, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC109730122, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC109730122, transcript variant X3
dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105879066, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105879066, transcript variant X2
dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105879036, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105879036, transcript variant X1
GIMAP family P-loop NTPase domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
aminoacyl tRNA synthetase complex interacting multifunctional protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 234 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
aminoacyl tRNA synthetase complex interacting multifunctional protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 234 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
aminoacyl tRNA synthetase complex interacting multifunctional protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 234 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
aminoacyl tRNA synthase complex-interacting multifunctional protein 1 isoform X1
aminoacyl tRNA synthase complex-interacting multifunctional protein 1 isoform X2
TBC1 domain containing kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 92 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain containing kinase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 92 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain containing kinase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC domain-containing protein kinase-like protein isoform X1
TBC domain-containing protein kinase-like protein isoform X2
TBC1 domain containing kinase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 77 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC domain-containing protein kinase-like protein isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC105879057, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105879057, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein LOC105879057 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC105879057 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain containing, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain-containing protein isoform X4
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain containing, transcript variant X3
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain-containing protein isoform X3
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain containing, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain-containing protein isoform X2
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain containing, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain containing, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain-containing protein isoform X6
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain containing, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain-containing protein isoform X5
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain containing, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain-containing protein isoform X7
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain containing, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain-containing protein isoform X1
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain containing, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 12, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 164 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 162 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 12, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 162 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 12, transcript variant X3
integrator complex subunit 12, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 162 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 12, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 162 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 38, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 38, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 38, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 38, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 38 isoform X5
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 38 isoform X2
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 38 isoform X4
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 38 isoform X1
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 38, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 38 isoform X3
pyrophosphatase (inorganic) 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
pyrophosphatase (inorganic) 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
pyrophosphatase (inorganic) 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
inorganic pyrophosphatase 2, mitochondrial isoform X2
inorganic pyrophosphatase 2, mitochondrial isoform X1
inorganic pyrophosphatase 2, mitochondrial isoform X3
tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 47 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 51 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
methylcytosine dioxygenase TET2 isoform X2
methylcytosine dioxygenase TET2 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC105879043, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105879043, transcript variant X1
CXXC finger protein 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CXXC finger protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CXXC finger protein 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 38 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CXXC-type zinc finger protein 4 isoform X2
CXXC-type zinc finger protein 4 isoform X1
CXXC-type zinc finger protein 4 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 1 EST, 14 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein E, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein E, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein E, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein E, transcript variant X5
centromere protein E, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centromere-associated protein E isoform X1
centromere-associated protein E isoform X4
centromere-associated protein E isoform X3
centromere-associated protein E isoform X5
centromere-associated protein E isoform X2
translation machinery-associated protein 7 pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments