Microcebus murinus isolate mixed chromosome 26, Mmur_3.0, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Euarchontoglires; Primates; Strepsirrhini; Lemuriformes; Cheirogaleidae; Microcebus.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM007686.1.\nAssembly name: Mmur_3.0\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Broad Institute on\n2017/02/06. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession ABDC00000000.3.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Broad Institute\nAssembly Date :: MAY-2015\nAssembly Method :: AllPathsLG v. 41070; Atlas Link v. 1.0;\n Atlas GapFill v. 2.0; PBJelly2 v. 14.9.9;\n Lachesis v. shendurelab-LACHESIS-2151de9;\n BioNano IrysSolve v. 2.1\nPolishing Method :: Pilon v 1.18\nAssembly Name :: Mmur_3.0\nGenome Coverage :: 221.6x\nSequencing Technology :: Illumina; PacBio RS; PacBio RSII\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Version :: Microcebus murinus Annotation\n Release 101\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 7.3\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
three separate animals were used in this assembly: #8(Reference animal), 1886F (Citronella), 7006M (Rosehip)
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 24% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ER degradation enhancing alpha-mannosidase like protein 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ER degradation-enhancing alpha-mannosidase-like protein 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 426 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 8B
basic helix-loop-helix family member e40
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 113 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
class E basic helix-loop-helix protein 40
uncharacterized LOC105869392, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105869392, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105869392, transcript variant X1
protein-tyrosine sulfotransferase 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 173 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1
sulfatase modifying factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 46 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
sulfatase modifying factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
sulfatase modifying factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
sulfatase modifying factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
MAP/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 3-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
MAP/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 3-like, transcript variant X2
MAP/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 3-like, transcript variant X3
MAP/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 3-like
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETMAR
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
leucine rich repeat neuronal 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 110 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 92 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat neuronal 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 90 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 303 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA nucleotidyl transferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 77 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA nucleotidyl transferase 1, transcript variant X2
tRNA nucleotidyl transferase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 75 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA nucleotidyl transferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 77 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
CCA tRNA nucleotidyltransferase 1, mitochondrial
interleukin 5 receptor subunit alpha, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
interleukin 5 receptor subunit alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
interleukin-5 receptor subunit alpha isoform X2
interleukin-5 receptor subunit alpha isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 53 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 55 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 53 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC105869401, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105869401, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 22 ESTs, 50 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 22 ESTs, 46 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 50 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 50 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 50 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 50 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 46 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X1
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X13
metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 isoform X5
metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 isoform X3
metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 isoform X1
metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 isoform X2
metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 isoform X4
metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 isoform X6
metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 isoform X8
glutamate metabotropic receptor 7, transcript variant X15
metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 isoform X9
uncharacterized LOC105869389, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105869389, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105869389, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC105869389, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105869389, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC105869390, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105869390, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105869386, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105869386, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105869386, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105882976, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC105882976, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC105882976, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105882976, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105882976, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105882976, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC105882976, transcript variant X7
dopamine receptor D1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dopamine receptor D1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dopamine receptor D1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 75 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
histamine receptor H2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
histamine receptor H2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105880456, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105880456, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC105880456, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105880456, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 204 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 281 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 291 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: SUMO-interacting motif-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
KIAA1191 ortholog, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
KIAA1191 ortholog, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 38 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
KIAA1191 ortholog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 64 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
KIAA1191 ortholog, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 37 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
KIAA1191 ortholog, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
KIAA1191 ortholog, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
KIAA1191 ortholog, transcript variant X4
putative monooxygenase p33MONOX isoform X1
putative monooxygenase p33MONOX isoform X3
putative monooxygenase p33MONOX isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
NOP16 nucleolar protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
NOP16 nucleolar protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
HIG1 hypoxia inducible domain family member 2A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
HIG1 domain family member 2A, mitochondrial
clathrin light chain B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
clathrin light chain B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fas associated factor family member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 114 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fas associated factor family member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 158 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fas associated factor family member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 114 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 44, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 44, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 44, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 44, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 44, transcript variant X4
ring finger protein 44, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 44, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 44, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 44, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 44, transcript variant X3
ring finger protein 44, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: cadherin-related family member 2
G protein regulated inducer of neurite outgrowth 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein regulated inducer of neurite outgrowth 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein-regulated inducer of neurite outgrowth 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E family member 1B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E type 1B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
cadherin-related family member 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
cadherin-related family member 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
cadherin-related family member 2-like isoform X2
cadherin-related family member 2-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 215 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 28 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 3 isoform X3
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 3 isoform X2
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 3 isoform X1
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 3 isoform X4
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 3 isoform X5
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 89 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: THUMP domain-containing protein 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 253 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 264 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 282 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 271 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 289 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X12
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 263 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 264 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 270 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 255 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 260 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 266 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 236 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 254 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 261 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 254 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 257 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 261 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 109 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 107 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 258 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X3
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X11
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X9
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X13
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 252 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X1
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X6
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X2
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X8
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X4
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X5
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X10
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X7
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X17
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X18
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 251 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 250 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X12
SET domain containing 5, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 245 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X14
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X16
SET domain-containing protein 5 isoform X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
lipoma HMGIC fusion partner-like 4 protein
myotubularin related protein 14, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 56 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 14, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 268 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 14, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 258 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 14, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 248 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 14, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 210 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 14, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 255 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 14, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 49 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 14 isoform X1
myotubularin-related protein 14 isoform X3
myotubularin-related protein 14 isoform X6
myotubularin-related protein 14 isoform X2
myotubularin-related protein 14 isoform X5
myotubularin related protein 14, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 56 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 14 isoform X4
myotubularin-related protein 14 isoform X7
copine family member 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
copine family member 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
copine family member 9, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 30 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
copine family member 9, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 86 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 94 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 1, transcript variant X2
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 94 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 1, transcript variant X10
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 92 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 86 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 1, transcript variant X4
bromodomain and PHD finger containing 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 102 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 55 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 55 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase, transcript variant X4
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase I, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 154 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase I, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase I, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase I, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type 1 isoform X2
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type 1 isoform X1
transcriptional adaptor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 144 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcriptional adaptor 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 339 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcriptional adaptor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 210 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcriptional adaptor 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 141 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
actin related protein 2/3 complex subunit 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 253 ESTs, 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 4
tubulin tyrosine ligase like 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tubulin tyrosine ligase like 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tubulin tyrosine ligase like 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tubulin tyrosine ligase like 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tubulin tyrosine ligase like 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tubulin tyrosine ligase like 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tubulin tyrosine ligase like 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RNA pseudouridylate synthase domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA pseudouridylate synthase domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA pseudouridylate synthase domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
RNA pseudouridylate synthase domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
RNA pseudouridylate synthase domain containing 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA pseudouridylate synthase domain containing 3, transcript variant X4
RNA pseudouridylate synthase domain containing 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA pseudouridylate synthase domain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
RNA pseudouridylate synthase domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cell death inducing DFFA like effector c
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: cell death activator CIDE-3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: interleukin-17 receptor E
interleukin 17 receptor C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 17 receptor C, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 17 receptor C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 17 receptor C, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 17 receptor C, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 17 receptor C, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 17 receptor C, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 17 receptor C, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 17 receptor C, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteine rich with EGF like domains 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 83 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteine rich with EGF like domains 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 94 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteine rich with EGF like domains 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domain protein 1
proline rich transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 219 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 29% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Fanconi anemia complementation group D2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 42 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Fanconi anemia complementation group D2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Fanconi anemia complementation group D2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Fanconi anemia group D2 protein isoform X1
Fanconi anemia group D2 protein isoform X2
Fanconi anemia group D2 protein isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
FANCD2 opposite strand, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
FANCD2 opposite strand, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 22 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
FANCD2 opposite strand, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
BRICK1, SCAR/WAVE actin nucleating complex subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 250 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 20 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor
interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-like 2 isoform X1
interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-like 2 isoform X4
interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-like 2 isoform X3
interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-like 2 isoform X2
TatD DNase domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
TatD DNase domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
TatD DNase domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TatD DNase domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
TatD DNase domain containing 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TatD DNase domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative deoxyribonuclease TATDN2 isoform X1
putative deoxyribonuclease TATDN2 isoform X2
ghrelin and obestatin prepropeptide, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ghrelin and obestatin prepropeptide, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ghrelin and obestatin prepropeptide, transcript variant X1
ghrelin and obestatin prepropeptide, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC13 homolog, nuclear pore and COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 101 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC13 homolog, nuclear pore and COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 336 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC13 homolog, nuclear pore and COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 146 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC13 homolog, nuclear pore and COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 187 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC13 homolog, nuclear pore and COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X1
SEC13 homolog, nuclear pore and COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 187 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC105859715, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105859715, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105859715, transcript variant X3
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6 like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 178 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6 like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6 like, transcript variant X6
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6 like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 176 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 185 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6 like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 187 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6 like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 172 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6-like isoform X3
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6-like isoform X5
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6-like isoform X6
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6-like isoform X2
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6-like isoform X1
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6-like isoform X7
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6-like isoform X4
CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6-like isoform X8
YTH domain-containing family protein 3 pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105859810, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105859810, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC105859810, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC105859810, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105859810, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC105859810, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 136 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 169 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 682 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98 ESTs, 37 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 ESTs, 37 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96 ESTs, 38 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 ESTs, 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96 ESTs, 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96 ESTs, 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 124 ESTs, 37 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98 ESTs, 37 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105859831, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105859831, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105859831, transcript variant X2
sosondowah ankyrin repeat domain family member B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sosondowah ankyrin repeat domain family member B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sosondowah ankyrin repeat domain family member B, transcript variant X5
sosondowah ankyrin repeat domain family member B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
sosondowah ankyrin repeat domain family member B, transcript variant X4
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein SOWAHB
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC109730071, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC109730071, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X11
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X8
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X12
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X13
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X15
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X2
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X3
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X7
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X4
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X14
coiled-coil domain containing 158, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 158 isoform X1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 158 isoform X5
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 158 isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 158 isoform X3
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 158 isoform X4
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 158 isoform X6
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 158 isoform X7
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: tyrosine-protein kinase RYK-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
starch-binding domain-containing protein 1
family with sequence similarity 47 member E, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 47 member E, transcript variant X1
family with sequence similarity 47 member E, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 389 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 149 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ADP-ribosyltransferase 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosyltransferase 3, transcript variant X5
ADP-ribosyltransferase 3, transcript variant X6
ADP-ribosyltransferase 3, transcript variant X4
ADP-ribosyltransferase 3, transcript variant X2
ADP-ribosyltransferase 3, transcript variant X3
ADP-ribosyltransferase 3, transcript variant X1
ADP-ribosyltransferase 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 43 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase 3 isoform X7
ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase 3 isoform X5
ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase 3 isoform X3
ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase 3 isoform X6
ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase 3 isoform X4
ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase 3 isoform X2
ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase 3 isoform X1
ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase 3 isoform X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 72 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 133 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein phosphatase with EF-hand domain 2, transcript variant X1
protein phosphatase with EF-hand domain 2, transcript variant X5
protein phosphatase with EF-hand domain 2, transcript variant X2
protein phosphatase with EF-hand domain 2, transcript variant X4
protein phosphatase with EF-hand domain 2, transcript variant X3
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase with EF-hands 2 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase with EF-hands 2 isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase with EF-hands 2 isoform X3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: uncharacterized protein LOC105860015
USO1 vesicle transport factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 496 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
USO1 vesicle transport factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 470 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
general vesicular transport factor p115 isoform X2
general vesicular transport factor p115 isoform X1
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 403 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 563 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 639 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 662 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 405 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 408 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 453 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X2
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X8
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X3
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X4
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X10
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 404 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X1
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 411 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 447 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 468 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 2 isoform X1
ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 2 isoform X4
ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 2 isoform X3
ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 2 isoform X6
G3BP stress granule assembly factor 2, transcript variant X9
ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 2 isoform X2
ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 2 isoform X5
ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 2 isoform X7
cyclin dependent kinase like 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin dependent kinase like 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 150 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105860160, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105860160, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC105860160, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105860160, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC105860160, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC105860160, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105860160, transcript variant X6
THAP domain containing 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
THAP domain containing 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger and CHY zinc finger domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 73 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger and CHY zinc finger domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RING finger and CHY zinc finger domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
RING finger and CHY zinc finger domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
ring finger and CHY zinc finger domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger and CHY zinc finger domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger and CHY zinc finger domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
ring finger and CHY zinc finger domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
RING finger and CHY zinc finger domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC105860175, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105860175, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105860175, transcript variant X1
prostate androgen-regulated mucin-like protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 42 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
epithelial mitogen, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 Proteins, and 25% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
epithelial mitogen, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 Proteins, and 35% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
epithelial mitogen, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NADP+ dependent) 2-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NADP+ dependent) 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NADP+ dependent) 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable bifunctional methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/cyclohydrolase 2 isoform X1
probable bifunctional methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/cyclohydrolase 2 isoform X2
growth-regulated protein homolog gamma-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
growth-regulated protein homolog gamma-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
growth-regulated protein homolog gamma-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethylmalonyl-CoA decarboxylase pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ras association domain-containing protein 6
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 509 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10655 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 17, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 515 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 17, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 512 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 17, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 446 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 17 isoform X1
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 17 isoform X2
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 17 isoform X6
ankyrin repeat domain 17, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 494 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 17, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 465 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 17 isoform X3
ankyrin repeat domain 17, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 494 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 17 isoform X4
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 17 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X6
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X7
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X8
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X4
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X10
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X11
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X13
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18 isoform X4
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18 isoform X3
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18 isoform X1
mitochondrial inner membrane protein COX18 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC109730078, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC109730078, transcript variant X2
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 3, transcript variant X2
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 3, transcript variant X4
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 3, transcript variant X6
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 3 isoform X1
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 3, transcript variant X5
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 3 isoform X2
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 3 isoform X3
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 3, transcript variant X9
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 3 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
solute carrier family 4 member 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 163 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 4 member 4, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 169 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 4 member 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 47 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 4 member 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 48 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 4 member 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 51 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 4 member 4, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 47 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 4 member 4, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 50 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 4 member 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 52 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 4 member 4, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 58 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 4 member 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 51 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 4 member 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 48 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 4 member 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 49 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransporter 1 isoform X7
electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransporter 1 isoform X3
electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransporter 1 isoform X5
electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransporter 1 isoform X1
electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransporter 1 isoform X6
electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransporter 1 isoform X2
electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransporter 1 isoform X10
electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransporter 1 isoform X8
electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransporter 1 isoform X4
electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransporter 1 isoform X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 62 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
MOB kinase activator 1B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
MOB kinase activator 1B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 17 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
MOB kinase activator 1B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
MOB kinase activator 1B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
G-rich RNA sequence binding factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 548 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
G-rich RNA sequence binding factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 404 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 27 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
UTP3, small subunit processome component homolog (S. cerevisiae)
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 126 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 355 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 26% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
submaxillary gland androgen-regulated protein 3B-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium binding protein, spermatid associated 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calcium-binding and spermatid-specific protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
odontogenic ameloblast-associated protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sulfotransferase family 1E member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
sulfotransferase family 1E member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, and 6% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 Proteins, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A2 isoform X1
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1, transcript variant X7
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A2 isoform X2
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1 isoform X7
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1 isoform X5
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1 isoform X8
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 Proteins
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A2 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A3 isoform X6
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 42 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A3 isoform X4
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A3 isoform X9
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B31-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B31-like, transcript variant X5
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B31-like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B31-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B31-like isoform X5
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B20-like isoform X3
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B20-like isoform X4
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B31-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 80 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B31-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7-like isoform X1
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 81 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 80 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 25% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 87 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 74 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 85 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B31-like isoform X1
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B31-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 46% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 97 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 88 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 86 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4-like isoform X5
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4-like, transcript variant X3
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4-like isoform X3
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4-like, transcript variant X4
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 85 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4-like isoform X1
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4-like isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 83 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 83 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 124 Proteins
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1 isoform X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
rab GDP dissociation inhibitor beta pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 27 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 55-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 82 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 111 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC105869301, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105869301, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 89 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 89 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 15% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
YTH domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 335 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
YTH domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 346 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
YTH domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 320 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
YTH domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 257 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
YTH domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 268 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
YTH domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 231 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
YTH domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 242 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
YTH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
YTH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
YTH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
YTH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X6
YTH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
YTH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
YTH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transmembrane protease serine 11B-like protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 8% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor isoform X1
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor isoform X2
ubiquitin like modifier activating enzyme 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 95 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 6
signal transducing adaptor family member 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: signal-transducing adaptor protein 1
centromere protein C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein C, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105869306, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105869306, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC105869286, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105869286, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105869286, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC105869287, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105869287, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: trans-2,3-enoyl-CoA reductase-like
uncharacterized LOC105872935, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105872935, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105872934, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105872934, transcript variant X1
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X15
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 95 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 94 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 93 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X1
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 49 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 52 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X10
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X3
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X2
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X11
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X5
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X9
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X4
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X8
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X7
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X6
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X1
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 31 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X14
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X13
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3 isoform X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 48% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC105867848, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105867848, transcript variant X1
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F-like, transcript variant X3
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F-like, transcript variant X2
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 24 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F-like isoform X3
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F-like isoform X2
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F-like isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC105867884, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105867884, transcript variant X1
glutaredoxin domain-containing cysteine-rich protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mannosyl-oligosaccharide 1,2-alpha-mannosidase IB pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
GUF1 homolog, GTPase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 58 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
translation factor GUF1, mitochondrial isoform X1
GUF1 homolog, GTPase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 46 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
translation factor GUF1, mitochondrial isoform X2
glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase 2, transcript variant X3
glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glucosamine-6-phosphate isomerase 2 isoform X1
glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
glucosamine-6-phosphate isomerase 2 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC105859337, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC105859337, transcript variant X1
gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor gamma1 subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor gamma1 subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-1 isoform X2
gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-1 isoform X1
gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor gamma1 subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-1 isoform X3
gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor alpha2 subunit
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 19 ESTs, 24 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 45 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor beta1 subunit
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 5 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 5 bases in 3 codons; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-1
uncharacterized LOC105859329, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC105859329, transcript variant X2
gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor alpha4 subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4
cytochrome c oxidase subunit 7B2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytochrome c oxidase subunit 7B2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytochrome c oxidase subunit 7B2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X3
cytochrome c oxidase subunit 7B2, mitochondrial