Choloepus didactylus isolate mChoDid1 chromosome 23, mChoDid1.pri, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Choloepus didactylus (southern two-toed sloth)
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Xenarthra; Pilosa; Folivora; Megalonychidae; Choloepus.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM026712.1.\nAssembly name: mChoDid1.pri\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Vertebrate Genomes Project on\n2020/11/03. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession JADCNF000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Vertebrate Genomes Project\nAssembly Date :: 14-SEP-2020\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. falcon-2018.31.08-03.06;\n FALCON-Unzip v. 6.0.0.47841; purge_dups\n github v.\n ca23030ccf4254dfd2d3a5ea90d0eed41c24f88b;\n Scaff10x v. 4.1.0; Bionano Solve v.\n 3.2.1_04122018; Salsa2 HiC v. 2.2; Polish\n pbgcpp v. 1.9.0; Longranger Align v.\n 2.2.2; freebayes v. 1.3.1; gEVAL manual\n curation v. 2020-09-14; VGP assembly\n pipeline v. 1.6\nAssembly Name :: mChoDid1.pri\nDiploid :: Principal pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: No\nGenome Coverage :: 56.84x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel I CLR; Illumina NovaSeq;\n Arima Genomics Hi-C; Bionano Genomics DLS\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Choloepus didactylus Annotation\n Release 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.5\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 6 bases in 4 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 6 bases in 4 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein 268
nuclear nucleic acid-binding protein C1D-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger protein 891, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 891, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X6
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X3
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X7
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X4
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X15
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X9
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X2
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X13
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X11
zinc finger protein 140, transcript variant X1
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X7
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X2
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X1
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X6
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X3
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X8
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X4
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X12
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 84, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
zinc finger protein 26, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 26, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 26, transcript variant X5
zinc finger protein 26, transcript variant X1
zinc finger protein 26, transcript variant X3
zinc finger protein 605, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 605, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 605, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
checkpoint with forkhead and ring finger domains, transcript variant X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CHFR isoform X1
checkpoint with forkhead and ring finger domains, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CHFR isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ankyrin repeat and LEM domain containing 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat and LEM domain-containing protein 2
PGAM family member 5, mitochondrial serine/threonine protein phosphatase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
PGAM family member 5, mitochondrial serine/threonine protein phosphatase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PGAM5, mitochondrial isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PGAM5, mitochondrial isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
purinergic receptor P2X 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
purinergic receptor P2X 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit, transcript variant X1
DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit, transcript variant X2
DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic subunit A isoform X1
DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic subunit A isoform X2
peroxisomal membrane protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal membrane protein 2, transcript variant X3
peroxisomal membrane protein 2, transcript variant X2
peroxisomal membrane protein 2 isoform X3
peroxisomal membrane protein 2 isoform X1
peroxisomal membrane protein 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
translation initiation factor IF-2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
translation initiation factor IF-2-like, transcript variant X2
translation initiation factor IF-2-like isoform X1
translation initiation factor IF-2-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 9, transcript variant X1
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 9 isoform X1
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 9 isoform X2
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 9, transcript variant X3
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 9, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 9 isoform X5
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 9, transcript variant X4
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 9 isoform X3
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 9, transcript variant X5
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 9, transcript variant X6
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 9 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX51
uncharacterized LOC119519130, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119519130, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X9
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X8
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X12
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X7
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X3
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X6
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X10
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X4
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X11
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X5
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X1
E1A-binding protein p400-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X12
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X8
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X7
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X15
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X11
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X14
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X6
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X2
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X5
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X9
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X13
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X3
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X10
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X4
E1A-binding protein p400-like isoform X1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00562
pseudouridine synthase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
pseudouridine synthase 1, transcript variant X1
tRNA pseudouridine synthase A isoform X1
tRNA pseudouridine synthase A isoform X2
pseudouridine synthase 1, transcript variant X3
tRNA pseudouridine synthase A isoform X3
unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1, transcript variant X6
unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1, transcript variant X9
unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1, transcript variant X1
unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK1 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK1 isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK1 isoform X8
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK1 isoform X5
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK1 isoform X9
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK1 isoform X6
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK1 isoform X7
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK1 isoform X4
unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1, transcript variant X3
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK1 isoform X3
matrix metallopeptidase 17, transcript variant X2
matrix metallopeptidase 17, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
matrix metallopeptidase 17, transcript variant X3
splicing factor SWAP, transcript variant X2
splicing factor SWAP, transcript variant X1
splicing factor SWAP, transcript variant X3
splicing factor SWAP, transcript variant X5
splicing factor SWAP, transcript variant X6
splicing factor SWAP, transcript variant X4
splicing factor, suppressor of white-apricot homolog isoform X3
splicing factor, suppressor of white-apricot homolog isoform X1
splicing factor, suppressor of white-apricot homolog isoform X5
splicing factor, suppressor of white-apricot homolog isoform X4
splicing factor, suppressor of white-apricot homolog isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
SAP domain-containing ribonucleoprotein-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: SAP domain-containing ribonucleoprotein-like
RIMS binding protein 2, transcript variant X1
RIMS binding protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RIMS binding protein 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RIMS binding protein 2, transcript variant X5
RIMS binding protein 2, transcript variant X4
RIMS binding protein 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosyltransferase 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
glycosyltransferase 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosyltransferase 1 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
glycosyltransferase 1 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
glycosyltransferase 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosyltransferase 1 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
glycosyltransferase 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
glycosyltransferase 1 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
glycosyltransferase 1 domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
glycosyltransferase 1 domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
solute carrier family 15 member 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 15 member 4, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 15 member 4 isoform X1
solute carrier family 15 member 4 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
arginine/serine-rich coiled-coil protein 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 10% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
transmembrane protein 132B, transcript variant X3
transmembrane protein 132B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 132B, transcript variant X1
transmembrane protein 132B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 132B, transcript variant X6
transmembrane protein 132B, transcript variant X5
transmembrane protein 132B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins
acetoacetyl-CoA synthetase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
acetoacetyl-CoA synthetase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DEAH-box helicase 37, transcript variant X1
DEAH-box helicase 37, transcript variant X2
probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX37 isoform X1
probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX37 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA alanine (anticodon UGC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA aspartic acid (anticodon GUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA phenylalanine (anticodon GAA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
scavenger receptor class B member 1, transcript variant X1
scavenger receptor class B member 1, transcript variant X3
scavenger receptor class B member 1, transcript variant X2
scavenger receptor class B member 1 isoform X3
scavenger receptor class B member 1 isoform X2
scavenger receptor class B member 1 isoform X1
scavenger receptor class B member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
scavenger receptor class B member 1, transcript variant X5
scavenger receptor class B member 1 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins
uncharacterized LOC119519137, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119519137, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119519137, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119519137, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119519137, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: nuclear receptor corepressor 2
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X12
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X11
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X6
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X5
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X4
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X1
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X2
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X7
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 664, transcript variant X13
coiled-coil domain containing 92, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 92, transcript variant X3
coiled-coil domain containing 92, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 92
dynein axonemal heavy chain 10, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dynein axonemal heavy chain 10, transcript variant X3
dynein axonemal heavy chain 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dynein axonemal heavy chain 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dynein heavy chain 10, axonemal isoform X2
dynein heavy chain 10, axonemal isoform X4
dynein heavy chain 10, axonemal isoform X3
dynein heavy chain 10, axonemal isoform X1
dynein axonemal heavy chain 10, transcript variant X8
dynein heavy chain 10, axonemal isoform X7
dynein axonemal heavy chain 10, transcript variant X6
dynein axonemal heavy chain 10, transcript variant X5
dynein heavy chain 10, axonemal isoform X5
dynein axonemal heavy chain 10, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dynein heavy chain 10, axonemal isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
tectonic family member 2, transcript variant X2
tectonic family member 2, transcript variant X1
general transcription factor IIH subunit 3, transcript variant X1
general transcription factor IIH subunit 3, transcript variant X2
general transcription factor IIH subunit 3 isoform X1
general transcription factor IIH subunit 3 isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2B subunit alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2B subunit alpha, transcript variant X2
translation initiation factor eIF-2B subunit alpha isoform X1
translation initiation factor eIF-2B subunit alpha isoform X2
DEAD-box helicase 55, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX55 isoform X1
DEAD-box helicase 55, transcript variant X2
ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX55 isoform X2
transmembrane emp24 domain-containing protein 2
uncharacterized LOC119519218, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119519218, transcript variant X2
Rab interacting lysosomal protein like 1, transcript variant X1
Rab interacting lysosomal protein like 1, transcript variant X2
Rab interacting lysosomal protein like 1, transcript variant X4
Rab interacting lysosomal protein like 1, transcript variant X5
Rab interacting lysosomal protein like 1, transcript variant X3
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein U11/U12 subunit 35, transcript variant X2
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein U11/U12 subunit 35, transcript variant X1
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein U11/U12 subunit 35, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
U11/U12 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein 35 kDa protein
Rab interacting lysosomal protein like 2
lysine methyltransferase 5A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine methyltransferase 5A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine methyltransferase 5A, transcript variant X2
lysine methyltransferase 5A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-lysine methyltransferase KMT5A isoform X2
N-lysine methyltransferase KMT5A isoform X1
N-lysine methyltransferase KMT5A isoform X3
N-lysine methyltransferase KMT5A isoform X4
strawberry notch homolog 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
strawberry notch homolog 1, transcript variant X3
strawberry notch homolog 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
strawberry notch homolog 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein strawberry notch homolog 1 isoform X1
protein strawberry notch homolog 1 isoform X3
protein strawberry notch homolog 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cyclin dependent kinase 2 associated protein 1, transcript variant X2
cyclin dependent kinase 2 associated protein 1, transcript variant X1
cyclin-dependent kinase 2-associated protein 1 isoform X1
cyclin dependent kinase 2 associated protein 1, transcript variant X3
cyclin-dependent kinase 2-associated protein 1 isoform X2
probable peptide chain release factor C12orf65 homolog, mitochondrial
M-phase phosphoprotein 9, transcript variant X3
M-phase phosphoprotein 9, transcript variant X1
M-phase phosphoprotein 9, transcript variant X7
M-phase phosphoprotein 9, transcript variant X6
M-phase phosphoprotein 9, transcript variant X2
M-phase phosphoprotein 9, transcript variant X4
M-phase phosphoprotein 9, transcript variant X5
M-phase phosphoprotein 9, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
M-phase phosphoprotein 9, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 54% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein membrane associated 2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: membrane-associated phosphatidylinositol transfer protein 2
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6 interacting protein 4, transcript variant X1
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 6 interacting protein 4, transcript variant X2
ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 6-interacting protein 4 isoform X2
ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 6-interacting protein 4 isoform X1
2-oxoglutarate and iron dependent oxygenase domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
2-oxoglutarate and iron dependent oxygenase domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
2-oxoglutarate and iron-dependent oxygenase domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
2-oxoglutarate and iron-dependent oxygenase domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 9, transcript variant X1
ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 9 isoform X1
ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 9 isoform X2
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 37B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
huntingtin interacting protein 1 related
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
huntingtin-interacting protein 1-related protein
uncharacterized LOC119519181, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119519181, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119519181, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119519181, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119519181, transcript variant X5
coiled-coil domain containing 62, transcript variant X4
coiled-coil domain containing 62, transcript variant X5
coiled-coil domain containing 62, transcript variant X1
coiled-coil domain containing 62, transcript variant X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 62 isoform X4
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 62 isoform X1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 62 isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 62 isoform X3
coiled-coil domain containing 62, transcript variant X3
density regulated re-initiation and release factor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2
kinetochore associated 1, transcript variant X1
kinetochore associated 1, transcript variant X2
kinetochore associated 1, transcript variant X3
kinetochore-associated protein 1 isoform X1
kinetochore-associated protein 1 isoform X2
kinetochore-associated protein 1 isoform X3
arginine and serine rich coiled-coil 2, transcript variant X1
arginine and serine rich coiled-coil 2, transcript variant X2
arginine/serine-rich coiled-coil protein 2 isoform X1
arginine/serine-rich coiled-coil protein 2 isoform X2
zinc finger CCHC-type containing 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCHC-type containing 8, transcript variant X2
zinc finger CCHC domain-containing protein 8 isoform X1
zinc finger CCHC domain-containing protein 8 isoform X2
zinc finger CCHC-type containing 8, transcript variant X3
zinc finger CCHC-type containing 8, transcript variant X4
zinc finger CCHC domain-containing protein 8 isoform X3
zinc finger CCHC-type containing 8, transcript variant X5
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00411
zinc finger CCHC domain-containing protein 8 isoform X4
zinc finger CCHC domain-containing protein 8 isoform X5
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X6
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X2
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X5
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X9
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X1
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X7
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X8
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X4
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X18
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X10
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X11
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X13
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X14
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X12
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X19
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X16
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X15
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X17
CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1, transcript variant X3
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X5
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X6
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X7
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X8
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X13
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X9
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X11
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X10
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X12
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X1
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X4
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X2
CAP-Gly domain-containing linker protein 1 isoform X3
VPS33A core subunit of CORVET and HOPS complexes, transcript variant X1
VPS33A core subunit of CORVET and HOPS complexes, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 33A isoform X1
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 33A isoform X2
diablo IAP-binding mitochondrial protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
diablo homolog, mitochondrial isoform X1
diablo IAP-binding mitochondrial protein, transcript variant X3
diablo IAP-binding mitochondrial protein, transcript variant X2
diablo homolog, mitochondrial isoform X2
UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 4
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: N-acetyllactosaminide beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 4
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 43
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
MLX interacting protein, transcript variant X2
MLX interacting protein, transcript variant X1
MLX interacting protein, transcript variant X3
BAF chromatin remodeling complex subunit BCL7A, transcript variant X1
BAF chromatin remodeling complex subunit BCL7A, transcript variant X2
B-cell CLL/lymphoma 7 protein family member A isoform X2
B-cell CLL/lymphoma 7 protein family member A isoform X1
cilia and flagella associated protein 251, transcript variant X1
cilia and flagella associated protein 251, transcript variant X2
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 251 isoform X1
cilia and flagella associated protein 251, transcript variant X3
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 251 isoform X2
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00408
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SET domain containing 1B, histone lysine methyltransferase
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETD1B
uncharacterized LOC119519223, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC119519223, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC119519223, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119519223, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119519223, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119519223, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC119519223, transcript variant X7
ras homolog family member F, filopodia associated, transcript variant X1
ras homolog family member F, filopodia associated, transcript variant X2
rho-related GTP-binding protein RhoF isoform X1
rho-related GTP-binding protein RhoF isoform X2
MORN repeat containing 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
MORN repeat containing 3, transcript variant X7
MORN repeat containing 3, transcript variant X1
MORN repeat containing 3, transcript variant X2
MORN repeat containing 3, transcript variant X5
MORN repeat containing 3, transcript variant X6
MORN repeat containing 3, transcript variant X3
MORN repeat containing 3, transcript variant X4
ORAI calcium release-activated calcium modulator 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1
lysine demethylase 2B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine demethylase 2B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 2B isoform X4
lysine-specific demethylase 2B isoform X5
lysine demethylase 2B, transcript variant X6
lysine demethylase 2B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine demethylase 2B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine demethylase 2B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine demethylase 2B, transcript variant X8
lysine demethylase 2B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 2B isoform X1
lysine-specific demethylase 2B isoform X2
lysine-specific demethylase 2B isoform X3
lysine-specific demethylase 2B isoform X6
lysine-specific demethylase 2B isoform X7
lysine demethylase 2B, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 2B isoform X8
ring finger protein 34, transcript variant X1
ring finger protein 34, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF34 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF34 isoform X2
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X5
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X4
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X6
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X7
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2 isoform X1
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2 isoform X2
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2 isoform X3
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2 isoform X5
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2 isoform X4
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2 isoform X6
purinergic receptor P2X 4, transcript variant X2
purinergic receptor P2X 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
purinergic receptor P2X 7, transcript variant X2
purinergic receptor P2X 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 81, transcript variant X5
intraflagellar transport 81, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 81, transcript variant X6
intraflagellar transport 81, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 81, transcript variant X4
intraflagellar transport 81, transcript variant X3
intraflagellar transport protein 81 homolog isoform X1
intraflagellar transport protein 81 homolog isoform X2
ATPase sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ transporting 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ transporting 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 2
multiple coagulation factor deficiency protein 2 homolog
anaphase promoting complex subunit 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
anaphase promoting complex subunit 7, transcript variant X2
anaphase-promoting complex subunit 7 isoform X1
anaphase-promoting complex subunit 7 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
actin related protein 2/3 complex subunit 3
actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
family with sequence similarity 216 member A, transcript variant X2
family with sequence similarity 216 member A, transcript variant X1
VPS29 retromer complex component, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
VPS29 retromer complex component, transcript variant X2
VPS29 retromer complex component, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 29 isoform X3
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 29 isoform X2
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 29 isoform X1
RAD9 checkpoint clamp component B, transcript variant X1
RAD9 checkpoint clamp component B, transcript variant X2
cell cycle checkpoint control protein RAD9B isoform X1
RAD9 checkpoint clamp component B, transcript variant X3
cell cycle checkpoint control protein RAD9B isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein phosphatase 1 catalytic subunit gamma
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PP1-gamma catalytic subunit
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 63
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin regulatory light chain 2, ventricular/cardiac muscle isoform
cut like homeobox 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cut like homeobox 2, transcript variant X2
cut like homeobox 2, transcript variant X3
PH domain containing endocytic trafficking adaptor 1, transcript variant X5
PH domain containing endocytic trafficking adaptor 1, transcript variant X7
PH domain containing endocytic trafficking adaptor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
PH domain containing endocytic trafficking adaptor 1, transcript variant X2
PH domain containing endocytic trafficking adaptor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
PH domain containing endocytic trafficking adaptor 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
PH domain containing endocytic trafficking adaptor 1, transcript variant X1
PH domain containing endocytic trafficking adaptor 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
PH domain containing endocytic trafficking adaptor 1, transcript variant X9
SH2B adaptor protein 3, transcript variant X1
SH2B adaptor protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
arf-GAP domain and FG repeat-containing protein 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 Proteins, and 27% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family member 10, transcript variant X1
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family member 10, transcript variant X3
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family member 10, transcript variant X2
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family member 10 isoform X1
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family member 10 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial
uncharacterized LOC119519430, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC119519430, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119519430, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 Proteins, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
MAPK activated protein kinase 5, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
MAPK activated protein kinase 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
MAPK activated protein kinase 5, transcript variant X3
MAPK activated protein kinase 5, transcript variant X2
MAPK activated protein kinase 5, transcript variant X4
MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 5 isoform X1
MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 5 isoform X2
MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 5 isoform X6
MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 5 isoform X3
MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 5 isoform X4
MAPK activated protein kinase 5, transcript variant X5
MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 5 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 1a-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 79 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 37% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 14% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
endoplasmic reticulum resident protein 29
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 25, NatB auxiliary subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF-type zinc finger domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
TRAF-type zinc finger domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
TRAF-type zinc finger domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
TRAF-type zinc finger domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
TRAF-type zinc finger domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
TRAF-type zinc finger domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
TRAF-type zinc finger domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
TRAF-type zinc finger domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
TRAF-type zinc finger domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
HECT domain E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
HECT domain E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
HECT domain E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 4, transcript variant X3
HECT domain E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 4, transcript variant X2
HECT domain E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 4, transcript variant X1
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HECTD4 isoform X5
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HECTD4 isoform X4
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HECTD4 isoform X3
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HECTD4 isoform X2
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HECTD4 isoform X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: 60S ribosomal protein L6
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 11, transcript variant X1
protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 11, transcript variant X2
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 11 isoform X1
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 11 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119519238, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119519238, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthase 2-like
deltex E3 ubiquitin ligase 1, transcript variant X1
deltex E3 ubiquitin ligase 1, transcript variant X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX1 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX1 isoform X2
RAS protein activator like 1, transcript variant X3
RAS protein activator like 1, transcript variant X1
RAS protein activator like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
rasGAP-activating-like protein 1 isoform X2
rasGAP-activating-like protein 1 isoform X3
rasGAP-activating-like protein 1 isoform X1
RAS protein activator like 1, transcript variant X4
rasGAP-activating-like protein 1 isoform X4
cilia and flagella associated protein 73, transcript variant X3
cilia and flagella associated protein 73, transcript variant X2
cilia and flagella associated protein 73, transcript variant X1
cilia and flagella associated protein 73, transcript variant X4
cilia and flagella associated protein 73, transcript variant X5
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 73 isoform X1
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 73 isoform X2
RBPJ interacting and tubulin associated 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: RBPJ-interacting and tubulin-associated protein 1
two pore segment channel 1, transcript variant X2
two pore segment channel 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
two pore segment channel 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
two pore calcium channel protein 1 isoform X1
two pore segment channel 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
two pore calcium channel protein 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
two pore calcium channel protein 1 isoform X3
two pore segment channel 1, transcript variant X5
two pore calcium channel protein 1 isoform X4
mitochondrial sodium/calcium exchanger protein
serine dehydratase, transcript variant X3
serine dehydratase, transcript variant X1
serine dehydratase, transcript variant X2
L-serine dehydratase/L-threonine deaminase isoform X2
L-serine dehydratase/L-threonine deaminase isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
RNA binding motif protein 19, transcript variant X1
RNA binding motif protein 19, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-box transcription factor 3, transcript variant X1
T-box transcription factor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-box transcription factor TBX3 isoform X2
T-box transcription factor TBX3 isoform X1
mediator complex subunit 13L, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator complex subunit 13L, transcript variant X4
mediator complex subunit 13L, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 13-like isoform X2
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 13-like isoform X1
mediator complex subunit 13L, transcript variant X3
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 13-like isoform X3
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 13-like isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
SREBF pathway regulator in golgi 1, transcript variant X2
SREBP regulating gene protein isoform X2
SREBF pathway regulator in golgi 1, transcript variant X1
SREBP regulating gene protein isoform X1
ring finger protein, transmembrane 2, transcript variant X1
ring finger protein, transmembrane 2, transcript variant X4
ring finger protein, transmembrane 2, transcript variant X3
ring finger protein, transmembrane 2, transcript variant X2
ring finger protein, transmembrane 2, transcript variant X5
RING finger and transmembrane domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
RING finger and transmembrane domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 8, transcript variant X3
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 8, transcript variant X2
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 8, transcript variant X4
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 8, transcript variant X1
F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 8 isoform X2
F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 8 isoform X1
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 8, transcript variant X5
F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 8 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin B homologous protein 3 isoform X1
calcineurin B homologous protein 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat and SOCS box containing 2, transcript variant X2
WD repeat and SOCS box containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat and SOCS box-containing protein 2 isoform X2
WD repeat and SOCS box-containing protein 2 isoform X1
V-set and immunoglobulin domain containing 10, transcript variant X2
V-set and immunoglobulin domain containing 10, transcript variant X3
V-set and immunoglobulin domain containing 10, transcript variant X1
V-set and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein 10 isoform X2
V-set and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein 10 isoform X1
phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase TAO3 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase TAO3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins
SDS3 homolog, SIN3A corepressor complex component, transcript variant X2
SDS3 homolog, SIN3A corepressor complex component, transcript variant X3
SDS3 homolog, SIN3A corepressor complex component, transcript variant X1
sin3 histone deacetylase corepressor complex component SDS3
U3 small nucleolar RNA-associated protein 15 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 4
heat shock protein family B (small) member 8
coiled-coil domain containing 60, transcript variant X3
coiled-coil domain containing 60, transcript variant X2
coiled-coil domain containing 60, transcript variant X5
coiled-coil domain containing 60, transcript variant X1
coiled-coil domain containing 60, transcript variant X4
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 60 isoform X1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 60 isoform X3
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 60 isoform X4
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 60 isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 60 isoform X5
interleukin enhancer-binding factor 2-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: interleukin enhancer-binding factor 2-like
protein kinase AMP-activated non-catalytic subunit beta 1, transcript variant X2
protein kinase AMP-activated non-catalytic subunit beta 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
5'-AMP-activated protein kinase subunit beta-1 isoform X1
5'-AMP-activated protein kinase subunit beta-1 isoform X2
protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC119519186, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119519186, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119519186, transcript variant X3
citron rho-interacting serine/threonine kinase, transcript variant X6
citron rho-interacting serine/threonine kinase, transcript variant X5
citron rho-interacting serine/threonine kinase, transcript variant X4
citron rho-interacting serine/threonine kinase, transcript variant X3
citron rho-interacting serine/threonine kinase, transcript variant X2
citron rho-interacting serine/threonine kinase, transcript variant X1
citron Rho-interacting kinase isoform X6
citron Rho-interacting kinase isoform X5
citron Rho-interacting kinase isoform X4
citron Rho-interacting kinase isoform X3
citron Rho-interacting kinase isoform X2
citron Rho-interacting kinase isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins
BICD family like cargo adaptor 1, transcript variant X6
BICD family like cargo adaptor 1, transcript variant X5
BICD family like cargo adaptor 1, transcript variant X1
BICD family like cargo adaptor 1, transcript variant X2
BICD family like cargo adaptor 1, transcript variant X3
BICD family like cargo adaptor 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
BICD family like cargo adaptor 1, transcript variant X4
BICD family-like cargo adapter 1 isoform X1
BICD family-like cargo adapter 1 isoform X5
BICD family-like cargo adapter 1 isoform X3
BICD family-like cargo adapter 1 isoform X2
BICD family-like cargo adapter 1 isoform X4
BICD family-like cargo adapter 1 isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ras-related protein Rab-35, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ras-related protein Rab-35, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00015
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
NAD-dependent protein lipoamidase sirtuin-4, mitochondrial isoform X1
NAD-dependent protein lipoamidase sirtuin-4, mitochondrial isoform X3
NAD-dependent protein lipoamidase sirtuin-4, mitochondrial isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC119519472, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119519472, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: RNA-binding protein Musashi homolog 1
cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6A1, mitochondrial
glutamyl-tRNA amidotransferase subunit C
glutamyl-tRNA(Gln) amidotransferase subunit C, mitochondrial
serine and arginine rich splicing factor 9
dynein light chain LC8-type 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 78 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
dynein light chain LC8-type 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 79 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
coenzyme Q5, methyltransferase, transcript variant X1
coenzyme Q5, methyltransferase, transcript variant X2
2-methoxy-6-polyprenyl-1,4-benzoquinol methylase, mitochondrial isoform X1
2-methoxy-6-polyprenyl-1,4-benzoquinol methylase, mitochondrial isoform X2
ring finger protein 10, transcript variant X1
ring finger protein 10, transcript variant X2
POP5 homolog, ribonuclease P/MRP subunit, transcript variant X1
ribonuclease P/MRP protein subunit POP5 isoform X1
POP5 homolog, ribonuclease P/MRP subunit, transcript variant X2
ribonuclease P/MRP protein subunit POP5 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: calcium-binding protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
unc-119 lipid binding chaperone B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
unc-119 lipid binding chaperone B, transcript variant X2
unc-119 lipid binding chaperone B, transcript variant X4
unc-119 lipid binding chaperone B, transcript variant X3
signal peptide peptidase like 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
signal peptide peptidase like 3, transcript variant X1
signal peptide peptidase-like 3 isoform X1
signal peptide peptidase-like 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 23 C12orf43 homolog, transcript variant X2
chromosome 23 C12orf43 homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthase-like protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00007
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 13A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X1
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X4
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X8
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X9
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X3
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X10
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X5
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X7
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X11
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X2
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X6
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X12
ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT2 isoform X13
trichoplein keratin filament-binding protein
glycolipid transfer protein, transcript variant X2
glycolipid transfer protein, transcript variant X1
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4 isoform X1
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4, transcript variant X2
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4 isoform X2
family with sequence similarity 222 member A, transcript variant X2
family with sequence similarity 222 member A, transcript variant X1
metabolism of cobalamin associated B, transcript variant X2
metabolism of cobalamin associated B, transcript variant X3
metabolism of cobalamin associated B, transcript variant X1
metabolism of cobalamin associated B, transcript variant X4
corrinoid adenosyltransferase isoform X1
corrinoid adenosyltransferase isoform X2
ubiquitin protein ligase E3B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin protein ligase E3B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin protein ligase E3B, transcript variant X1
ubiquitin protein ligase E3B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA-directed RNA polymerase I subunit RPA12-like
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 10, transcript variant X1
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 10, transcript variant X2
BTB/POZ domain-containing adapter for CUL3-mediated RhoA degradation protein 3 isoform X1
BTB/POZ domain-containing adapter for CUL3-mediated RhoA degradation protein 3 isoform X2
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00405
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
acetyl-CoA carboxylase beta, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
acetyl-CoA carboxylase beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
acetyl-CoA carboxylase beta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
acetyl-CoA carboxylase beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
acetyl-CoA carboxylase beta, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119519384, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119519384, transcript variant X1
alkB homolog 2, alpha-ketoglutarate dependent dioxygenase
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 30
SV2 related protein, transcript variant X1
SV2 related protein, transcript variant X2
synaptic vesicle 2-related protein isoform X1
SV2 related protein, transcript variant X3
synaptic vesicle 2-related protein isoform X2
slingshot protein phosphatase 1, transcript variant X1
protein phosphatase Slingshot homolog 1 isoform X1
slingshot protein phosphatase 1, transcript variant X2
slingshot protein phosphatase 1, transcript variant X4
slingshot protein phosphatase 1, transcript variant X3
protein phosphatase Slingshot homolog 1 isoform X2
slingshot protein phosphatase 1, transcript variant X7
slingshot protein phosphatase 1, transcript variant X5
protein phosphatase Slingshot homolog 1 isoform X3
slingshot protein phosphatase 1, transcript variant X6
protein phosphatase Slingshot homolog 1 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 119, transcript variant X2
transmembrane protein 119, transcript variant X1
iron-sulfur cluster assembly enzyme ISCU, mitochondrial
spliceosome associated factor 3, U4/U6 recycling protein, transcript variant X1
spliceosome associated factor 3, U4/U6 recycling protein, transcript variant X2
squamous cell carcinoma antigen recognized by T-cells 3 isoform X1
squamous cell carcinoma antigen recognized by T-cells 3 isoform X2
FIC domain protein adenylyltransferase, transcript variant X2
FIC domain protein adenylyltransferase, transcript variant X1
chemerin chemokine-like receptor 1, transcript variant X1
chemerin chemokine-like receptor 1, transcript variant X2
chemerin chemokine-like receptor 1, transcript variant X3
WSC domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
WSC domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
WSC domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 47% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
small G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X4
small G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X1
small G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
small G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
small G protein signaling modulator 1 isoform X1
small G protein signaling modulator 1 isoform X3
small G protein signaling modulator 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
KIAA1671 ortholog, transcript variant X4
KIAA1671 ortholog, transcript variant X1
KIAA1671 ortholog, transcript variant X3
MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 47% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2-like
KIAA1671 ortholog, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein KIAA1671 homolog isoform X1
uncharacterized protein KIAA1671 homolog isoform X2
KIAA1671 ortholog, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized protein KIAA1671 homolog isoform X4
KIAA1671 ortholog, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized protein KIAA1671 homolog isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
crystallin beta B3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin beta B3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin beta B3, transcript variant X3
crystallin beta B3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins, and 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
seizure 6-like protein, transcript variant X1
seizure 6-like protein, transcript variant X2
seizure 6-like protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
aspartate beta-hydroxylase domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
aspartate beta-hydroxylase domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
aspartate beta-hydroxylase domain-containing protein 2
HPS4 biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 3 subunit 2
SRR1 domain containing, transcript variant X1
SRR1 domain containing, transcript variant X2
tuftelin interacting protein 11, transcript variant X1
tuftelin-interacting protein 11 isoform X1
tuftelin interacting protein 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tuftelin-interacting protein 11 isoform X2
tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase 2, transcript variant X1
tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
guanine nucleotide exchange factor subunit RIC1-like
MN1 proto-oncogene, transcriptional regulator
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: transcriptional activator MN1
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein beta, transcript variant X1
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein beta, transcript variant X2
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein beta isoform isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein beta isoform isoform X2
armadillo repeat-containing X-linked protein 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: armadillo repeat-containing X-linked protein 3-like
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 28, transcript variant X2
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 28, transcript variant X1
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 28, transcript variant X4
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 28, transcript variant X3
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 28, transcript variant X5
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 28 isoform X2
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 28 isoform X1
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 28 isoform X3
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 28 isoform X4
uncharacterized LOC119519641, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119519641, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: serine/threonine-protein kinase Chk2
HscB mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster cochaperone, transcript variant X1
HscB mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster cochaperone, transcript variant X2
iron-sulfur cluster co-chaperone protein HscB isoform X2
iron-sulfur cluster co-chaperone protein HscB isoform X1
HscB mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster cochaperone, transcript variant X3
iron-sulfur cluster co-chaperone protein HscB isoform X3
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 117
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: X-box-binding protein 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase ZNRF3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: uncharacterized protein C22orf31 homolog
kringle containing transmembrane protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X10
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X8
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X9
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X8
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X9
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X7
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X6
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
rhomboid domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
rhomboid domain containing 3, transcript variant X4
rhomboid domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
rhomboid domain containing 3, transcript variant X5
rhomboid domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
rhomboid domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
rhomboid domain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
rhomboid domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
EWS RNA binding protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
EWS RNA binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
EWS RNA binding protein 1, transcript variant X3
EWS RNA binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
EWS RNA binding protein 1, transcript variant X4
adaptor related protein complex 1 subunit beta 1, transcript variant X1
adaptor related protein complex 1 subunit beta 1, transcript variant X5
adaptor related protein complex 1 subunit beta 1, transcript variant X4
adaptor related protein complex 1 subunit beta 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
adaptor related protein complex 1 subunit beta 1, transcript variant X2
adaptor related protein complex 1 subunit beta 1, transcript variant X6
adaptor related protein complex 1 subunit beta 1, transcript variant X7
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01200
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger matrin-type 5, transcript variant X1
zinc finger matrin-type 5, transcript variant X3
zinc finger matrin-type 5, transcript variant X2
zinc finger matrin-type 5, transcript variant X4
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant X1
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant X2
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant X3
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform X2
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform X1
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform X3
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X1
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X4
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X5
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X6
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 Proteins, and 29% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X3
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform X1
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform X2
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform X3
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform X4
uncharacterized protein C14orf119 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
HORMA domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
HORMA domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
HORMA domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
HORMA domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
HORMA domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
HORMA domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins
LIF interleukin 6 family cytokine, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIF interleukin 6 family cytokine, transcript variant X1
cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1, transcript variant X2
cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1, transcript variant X1
cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1, transcript variant X3
cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1 isoform X2
cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1 isoform X1
cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 157, transcript variant X4
coiled-coil domain containing 157, transcript variant X1
coiled-coil domain containing 157, transcript variant X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 157 isoform X1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 157 isoform X4
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 157 isoform X2
coiled-coil domain containing 157, transcript variant X3
coiled-coil domain containing 157, transcript variant X5
coiled-coil domain containing 157, transcript variant X6
coiled-coil domain containing 157, transcript variant X7
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 157 isoform X3
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 157 isoform X5
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 157 isoform X6
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 157 isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zona pellucida sperm-binding protein 3-like
uncharacterized LOC119519504, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC119519504, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC119519504 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC119519504 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: SEC14-like protein 3
SEC14 like lipid binding 4, transcript variant X3
SEC14 like lipid binding 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC14 like lipid binding 4, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119519500, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119519500, transcript variant X1
galactose-3-O-sulfotransferase 1, transcript variant X2
galactose-3-O-sulfotransferase 1, transcript variant X1
galactose-3-O-sulfotransferase 1, transcript variant X3
galactosylceramide sulfotransferase isoform X1
galactosylceramide sulfotransferase isoform X2
pescadillo ribosomal biogenesis factor 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins
dual specificity phosphatase 18, transcript variant X5
dual specificity phosphatase 18, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 18, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 18, transcript variant X1
dual specificity phosphatase 18, transcript variant X3
dual specificity protein phosphatase 18 isoform X1
dual specificity phosphatase 18, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
dual specificity protein phosphatase 18 isoform X2
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant X1
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant X2
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant X4
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant X3
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 2, transcript variant X2
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase J, transcript variant X2
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase J, transcript variant X1
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase A isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase A isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 60% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: group 3 secretory phospholipase A2
ring finger protein 185, transcript variant X3
ring finger protein 185, transcript variant X1
ring finger protein 185, transcript variant X2
ring finger protein 185, transcript variant X4
LIM domain kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIM domain kinase 2, transcript variant X1
LIM domain kinase 2, transcript variant X3
LIM domain kinase 2, transcript variant X4
LIM domain kinase 2, transcript variant X5
phosphoinositide-3-kinase interacting protein 1, transcript variant X1
phosphoinositide-3-kinase interacting protein 1, transcript variant X3
phosphoinositide-3-kinase interacting protein 1, transcript variant X2
phosphoinositide-3-kinase-interacting protein 1 isoform X1
phosphoinositide-3-kinase-interacting protein 1 isoform X2
phosphoinositide-3-kinase-interacting protein 1 isoform X3
developmentally regulated GTP binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
developmentally regulated GTP binding protein 1, transcript variant X3
POZ/BTB and AT hook containing zinc finger 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: POZ-, AT hook-, and zinc finger-containing protein 1
developmentally regulated GTP binding protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
developmentally regulated GTP binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
developmentally-regulated GTP-binding protein 1 isoform X1
developmentally-regulated GTP-binding protein 1 isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X4
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X3
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X5
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X6
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E transporter isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E transporter isoform X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E transporter isoform X3
SFI1 centrin binding protein, transcript variant X1
SFI1 centrin binding protein, transcript variant X3
SFI1 centrin binding protein, transcript variant X4
SFI1 centrin binding protein, transcript variant X2
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X2
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X1
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X4
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X5
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X3
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X6
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme, mitochondrial isoform X2
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme, mitochondrial isoform X1
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme, mitochondrial isoform X3
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme, mitochondrial isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 17% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: BBSome-interacting protein 1-like
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X6
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X3
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X1
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X12
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X11
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X9
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X2
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X13
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X5
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X8
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X7
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X4
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X14
proline rich 14 like, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DEP domain containing 5, GATOR1 subcomplex subunit, transcript variant X4
DEP domain containing 5, GATOR1 subcomplex subunit, transcript variant X5
DEP domain containing 5, GATOR1 subcomplex subunit, transcript variant X3
DEP domain containing 5, GATOR1 subcomplex subunit, transcript variant X2
DEP domain containing 5, GATOR1 subcomplex subunit, transcript variant X7
DEP domain containing 5, GATOR1 subcomplex subunit, transcript variant X10
DEP domain containing 5, GATOR1 subcomplex subunit, transcript variant X1
DEP domain containing 5, GATOR1 subcomplex subunit, transcript variant X6
DEP domain containing 5, GATOR1 subcomplex subunit, transcript variant X8
DEP domain containing 5, GATOR1 subcomplex subunit, transcript variant X9
DEP domain containing 5, GATOR1 subcomplex subunit, transcript variant X11
DEP domain containing 5, GATOR1 subcomplex subunit, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 37% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: uncharacterized protein C22orf24 homolog
tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein eta
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 25% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 Proteins, and 15% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein 558-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 46% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 49% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-19-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable non-functional immunoglobulin lambda variable 5-48
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
immunoglobulin lambda variable 4-69-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins
probable non-functional immunoglobulin lambda variable 11-55
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-25-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 161 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 Proteins, and 42% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
immunoglobulin lambda variable 2-14-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 338 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
immunoglobulin lambda variable 5-45-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 Proteins, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 72 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 86 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 65 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 Proteins