Salvelinus alpinus isolate IW2-2015 linkage group LG37, ASM291031v2, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Actinopterygii; Neopterygii; Teleostei; Protacanthopterygii; Salmoniformes; Salmonidae; Salmoninae; Salvelinus.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM009428.1.\nAssembly name: ASM291031v1\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the University of Victoria on\n2018/02/02. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession PPUY00000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: University of Victoria\nAssembly Date :: OCT-2017\nAssembly Method :: AllPaths v. 52488; PBSuite v. 15.8.24;\n SSpace-LongRead v. 1.1\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 146.0x\nSequencing Technology :: Illumina Paired-End; Illumina Mate-Pair;\n PacBio\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Salvelinus alpinus Annotation\n Release 101\nAnnotation Version :: 101\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.0\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline-, glutamic acid- and leucine-rich protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
arachidonate 12-lipoxygenase, 12S-type-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: arachidonate 12-lipoxygenase, 12S-type-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromatin complexes subunit BAP18, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromatin complexes subunit BAP18, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromatin complexes subunit BAP18, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromatin complexes subunit BAP18, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromatin complexes subunit BAP18 isoform X1
chromatin complexes subunit BAP18 isoform X2
chromatin complexes subunit BAP18 isoform X3
chromatin complexes subunit BAP18 isoform X4
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GGAP01016577.1
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 229 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 147 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA serine (anticodon UGA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA tryptophan (anticodon CCA); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transcription cofactor HES-6-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription cofactor HES-6-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription cofactor HES-6-like isoform X1
transcription factor HES-4-like isoform X2
transfer RNA leucine (anticodon AAG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
metallo-beta-lactamase domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
metallo-beta-lactamase domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960214, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960214, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01290
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
sentrin-specific protease 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
sentrin-specific protease 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00003
uncharacterized LOC111960268, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960268, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960268, transcript variant X2
serine protease HTRA3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine protease HTRA3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein 1 isoform X2
SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein 1 isoform X1
SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein 1 isoform X3
calcium-binding protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium-binding protein 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative ferric-chelate reductase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative ferric-chelate reductase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative ferric-chelate reductase 1, transcript variant X3
putative ferric-chelate reductase 1 isoform X1
putative ferric-chelate reductase 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative ferric-chelate reductase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960364, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111960364, transcript variant X2
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase CYLD
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D-like, transcript variant X3
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D-like isoform X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D-like isoform X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D-like isoform X3
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D-like isoform X4
H/ACA ribonucleoprotein complex subunit 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 12 member 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 12 member 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 12 member 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 12 member 6, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 12 member 6 isoform X1
solute carrier family 12 member 6 isoform X3
solute carrier family 12 member 6 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM39, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM39, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960373, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960373, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sterile alpha motif domain-containing protein 9-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GEKT01002485.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 9 bases in 7 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; added 586 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 9 bases in 7 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; added 586 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calsequestrin-1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
calsequestrin-1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1, transcript variant X7
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1 isoform X7
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1, transcript variant X2
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1, transcript variant X10
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1 isoform X2
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1, transcript variant X1
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1, transcript variant X3
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1 isoform X1
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1 isoform X3
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1, transcript variant X6
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1 isoform X6
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1, transcript variant X5
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1, transcript variant X4
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1, transcript variant X8
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1 isoform X4
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1 isoform X8
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1 isoform X5
butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1 isoform X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A1, transcript variant X2
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A1, transcript variant X4
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A1 isoform X2
butyrophilin subfamily 2 member A1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
endonuclease domain-containing 1 protein-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear factor 7, ovary, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear factor 7, ovary, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
apolipoprotein L2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
apolipoprotein L2-like, transcript variant X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GEKT01007913.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 14 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 14 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: kinesin light chain 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 12% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
hepatic lectin-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
hepatic lectin-like, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC111960233 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
RNA-binding protein 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 132 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
homeobox protein SIX6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
homeobox protein SIX6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,4-glucuronyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,4-glucuronyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA serine (anticodon GCU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
prefoldin subunit 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
prefoldin subunit 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: H(+)/Cl(-) exchange transporter 3-like
microfibrillar-associated protein 3-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
microfibrillar-associated protein 3-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
microfibrillar-associated protein 3-like isoform X1
microfibrillar-associated protein 3-like isoform X2
kynurenine/alpha-aminoadipate aminotransferase, mitochondrial-like, transcript variant X4
kynurenine/alpha-aminoadipate aminotransferase, mitochondrial-like, transcript variant X6
kynurenine/alpha-aminoadipate aminotransferase, mitochondrial-like, transcript variant X3
kynurenine/alpha-aminoadipate aminotransferase, mitochondrial-like, transcript variant X7
kynurenine/alpha-aminoadipate aminotransferase, mitochondrial-like, transcript variant X5
kynurenine/alpha-aminoadipate aminotransferase, mitochondrial-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
kynurenine/alpha-aminoadipate aminotransferase, mitochondrial-like, transcript variant X2
kynurenine/alpha-aminoadipate aminotransferase, mitochondrial-like
INO80 complex subunit B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
INO80 complex subunit B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTPase IMAP family member 7-like, transcript variant X1
GTPase IMAP family member 7-like, transcript variant X3
GTPase IMAP family member 7-like, transcript variant X2
GTPase IMAP family member 7-like isoform X2
GTPase IMAP family member 7-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA leucine (anticodon CAG); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA valine (anticodon UAC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
acetylcholine receptor subunit beta-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: acetylcholine receptor subunit beta-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1-2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1-2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1-2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1-2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1-2 isoform X1
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1-2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1, transcript variant X1
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 isoform X4
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 isoform X2
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 isoform X3
fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF-interacting protein with FHA domain-containing protein A-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 28% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111960101, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960101, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC111960101 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC111960101 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111960004, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960004, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC111960004 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC111960004 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
T-cell surface glycoprotein CD8 beta chain-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized mitochondrial protein AtMg00860-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 36% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 11-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: dedicator of cytokinesis protein 11-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytokine receptor common subunit gamma-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon UCU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
high affinity immunoglobulin epsilon receptor subunit gamma, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
high affinity immunoglobulin epsilon receptor subunit gamma, transcript variant X2
high affinity immunoglobulin epsilon receptor subunit gamma isoform X1
high affinity immunoglobulin epsilon receptor subunit gamma isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC111960432, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960432, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111960432, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: neuralized-like protein 4
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 15-like
uncharacterized LOC111960411, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111960411, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111960411, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111960411, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 12-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cytochrome b5 domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 38, NatC auxiliary subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
active breakpoint cluster region-related protein-like
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GEKT01035759.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 5 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 5 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
segment polarity protein dishevelled homolog DVL-2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
segment polarity protein dishevelled homolog DVL-2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
segment polarity protein dishevelled homolog DVL-2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
arf-GAP domain and FG repeat-containing protein 2-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
arf-GAP domain and FG repeat-containing protein 2-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
arf-GAP domain and FG repeat-containing protein 2-like isoform X2
arf-GAP domain and FG repeat-containing protein 2-like isoform X1
arf-GAP with coiled-coil, ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
solute carrier family 16 member 13, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 16 member 13, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 16 member 13, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 16 member 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
monocarboxylate transporter 13 isoform X2
monocarboxylate transporter 13 isoform X1
B cell CLL/lymphoma 6B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
B cell CLL/lymphoma 6B, transcript variant X1
B-cell CLL/lymphoma 6 member B protein isoform X2
B-cell CLL/lymphoma 6 member B protein isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like, transcript variant X11
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like, transcript variant X10
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like, transcript variant X3
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like, transcript variant X7
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like, transcript variant X6
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like, transcript variant X5
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like, transcript variant X1
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like isoform X10
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like isoform X9
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like isoform X2
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like isoform X6
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like isoform X3
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like isoform X5
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like isoform X4
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like isoform X1
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like, transcript variant X9
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like, transcript variant X8
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like isoform X8
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L3-like isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
5,6-dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid oxidase-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: techylectin-5A-like
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X4
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X3
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X6
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X10
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X12
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X14
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X8
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X16
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X15
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X18
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X11
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X27
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X28
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X19
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X22
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X23
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X26
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X1
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X11
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X3
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X13
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X7
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X15
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X2
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X4
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X14
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X16
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase S-like isoform X17
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X18
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X20
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X21
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X23
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X6
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X19
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X5
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X22
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X8
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X9
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X24
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X10
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X12
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X26
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X27
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase delta-like isoform X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
inactive ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 53
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
Kv channel-interacting protein 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Kv channel-interacting protein 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Kv channel-interacting protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Kv channel-interacting protein 4 isoform X3
Kv channel-interacting protein 4 isoform X2
Kv channel-interacting protein 4 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cytosolic beta-glucosidase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytosolic beta-glucosidase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytosolic beta-glucosidase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha isoform X9
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha isoform X8
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha isoform X3
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha isoform X4
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha isoform X7
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha isoform X6
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha isoform X2
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha isoform X1
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha isoform X5
pre-mRNA-splicing factor ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX15, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA-splicing factor ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA-splicing factor ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX15, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA-splicing factor ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX15 isoform X2
pre-mRNA-splicing factor ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX15 isoform X1
pre-mRNA-splicing factor ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX15 isoform X3
pre-mRNA-splicing factor ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX15, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA-splicing factor ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX15, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
pre-mRNA-splicing factor ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX15 isoform X4
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 149-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960054, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960054, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111960054, transcript variant X2
gastrula zinc finger protein XlCGF67.1-like
zinc finger protein 239-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 194 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 239-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
gastrula zinc finger protein XlCGF7.1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 78 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein A'-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein A'-like isoform X2
U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein A'-like, transcript variant X1
U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein A'-like, transcript variant X2
U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein A'-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
FRAS1 related extracellular matrix 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
FRAS1 related extracellular matrix 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
FRAS1-related extracellular matrix protein 1 isoform X1
FRAS1 related extracellular matrix 1, transcript variant X3
FRAS1-related extracellular matrix protein 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1-like, transcript variant X2
rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1-like, transcript variant X1
rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1-like isoform X3
rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1-like isoform X2
rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1-like isoform X1
excitatory amino acid transporter 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA methyltransferase 10 homolog A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA methyltransferase 10 homolog A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA methyltransferase 10 homolog A isoform X2
tRNA methyltransferase 10 homolog A isoform X1
3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 4, transcript variant X3
3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
very-long-chain (3R)-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 4 isoform X1
very-long-chain (3R)-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 4 isoform X2
very-long-chain (3R)-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 4 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
MLLT3, super elongation complex subunit, transcript variant X4
MLLT3, super elongation complex subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
MLLT3, super elongation complex subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
MLLT3, super elongation complex subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA damage-inducible transcript 4-like protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein PB18E9.04c, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein PB18E9.04c, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized protein PB18E9.04c, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein PB18E9.04c, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized protein PB18E9.04c, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized protein PB18E9.04c, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
polycystic kidney disease protein 1-like 3 isoform X4
uncharacterized protein PB18E9.04c isoform X5
uncharacterized protein PB18E9.04c isoform X6
uncharacterized protein PB18E9.04c isoform X3
uncharacterized protein PB18E9.04c isoform X2
uncharacterized protein PB18E9.04c isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoform
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
B cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats 1
B-cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: nuclear factor 1 B-type-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00286
tripartite motif-containing protein 16-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif-containing protein 16-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 133 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif-containing protein 16-like isoform X1
tripartite motif-containing protein 16-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960465, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111960465, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111960465, transcript variant X1
NLR family CARD domain-containing protein 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
stabilizer of axonemal microtubules 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960099, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960099, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 251, transcript variant X2
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 251, transcript variant X1
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 251
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX1-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
transfer RNA alanine (anticodon CGC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX1-like, transcript variant X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX1-like isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX1-like isoform X2
myb/SANT-like DNA-binding domain-containing protein 1
regulator of G protein signaling 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G protein signaling 12, transcript variant X2
regulator of G protein signaling 12, transcript variant X5
regulator of G protein signaling 12, transcript variant X3
regulator of G protein signaling 12, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of G-protein signaling 12 isoform X1
regulator of G-protein signaling 12 isoform X2
hepatocyte growth factor activator-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
hepatocyte growth factor activator-like, transcript variant X2
hepatocyte growth factor activator-like, transcript variant X4
hepatocyte growth factor activator-like, transcript variant X3
hepatocyte growth factor activator-like isoform X4
hepatocyte growth factor activator-like isoform X1
hepatocyte growth factor activator-like isoform X3
hepatocyte growth factor activator-like isoform X2
docking protein 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
docking protein 7, transcript variant X2
docking protein 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable tRNA (uracil-O(2)-)-methyltransferase
activated CDC42 kinase 1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
activated CDC42 kinase 1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GEKT01039127.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 493 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor-associated protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein pathway suppressor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein pathway suppressor 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein pathway suppressor 2, transcript variant X1
G protein pathway suppressor 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
G protein pathway suppressor 2, transcript variant X4
G protein pathway suppressor 2 isoform X1
G protein pathway suppressor 2 isoform X3
G protein pathway suppressor 2 isoform X4
G protein pathway suppressor 2 isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-1
Y-box-binding protein 2-A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
Y-box-binding protein 2-A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
Y-box-binding protein 2-A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
Y-box-binding protein 2-A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase eta-like
macrophage-capping protein-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage-capping protein-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage-capping protein-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage-capping protein-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
macrophage-capping protein-like isoform X1
macrophage-capping protein-like isoform X2
DNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit RPB1-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 8 bases in 7 codons; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 8 bases in 7 codons; deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: DNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit RPB1-like
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960345, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960345, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC111960345 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC111960345 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
equilibrative nucleoside transporter 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
putative transcription factor p65 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC111960111, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111960111, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111960111, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
citrate synthase-lysine N-methyltransferase CSKMT, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycogen phosphorylase, muscle form, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycogen phosphorylase, muscle form, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycogen phosphorylase, muscle form isoform X1
glycogen phosphorylase, muscle form isoform X2
splicing factor 1, transcript variant X1
splicing factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4.1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4.1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4.1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4.1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding protein 4.1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X2
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 2, transcript variant X1
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 2 isoform X4
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 2 isoform X3
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 2 isoform X2
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960389, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111960389, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC111960389 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC111960389 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
evolutionarily conserved signaling intermediate in Toll pathway, mitochondrial
echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 isoform X1
echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 3 isoform X2
metastasis-associated protein MTA2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
metastasis-associated protein MTA2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
metastasis-associated protein MTA2 isoform X1
metastasis-associated protein MTA2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 6 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 6 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 6 like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
TAF6-like RNA polymerase II p300/CBP-associated factor-associated factor 65 kDa subunit 6L
potassium channel subfamily K member 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
EH domain-binding protein 1-like protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
EH domain-binding protein 1-like protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
EH domain-binding protein 1-like protein 1, transcript variant X4
EH domain-binding protein 1-like protein 1, transcript variant X5
EH domain-binding protein 1-like protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
EH domain-binding protein 1-like protein 1 isoform X2
EH domain-binding protein 1-like protein 1 isoform X6
EH domain-binding protein 1-like protein 1 isoform X4
EH domain-binding protein 1-like protein 1 isoform X5
EH domain-binding protein 1-like protein 1 isoform X7
EH domain-binding protein 1-like protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha, muscle-specific form isoform X1
EH domain-binding protein 1-like protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC111960392 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase pellino homolog 1-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase pellino homolog 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X10
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X9
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain isoform X10
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain isoform X4
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta chain isoform X12
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain isoform X8
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain isoform X2
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta chain isoform X13
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain isoform X9
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta chain isoform X6
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain isoform X3
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta chain isoform X11
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain isoform X7
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta chain isoform X5
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta 1 chain isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD2A-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase-like
zinc finger CCHC-type containing 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCHC-type containing 4, transcript variant X1
zinc finger CCHC domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
zinc finger CCHC domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: actin-binding LIM protein 2
actin filament associated protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
actin filament-associated protein 1 isoform X2
actin filament associated protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
actin filament associated protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
actin filament-associated protein 1 isoform X1
actin filament-associated protein 1 isoform X3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GGAP01017524.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 92 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 92 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
TBC1 domain family member 14, transcript variant X2
TBC1 domain family member 14, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 14, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein KIAA0232, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein KIAA0232, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
recombining binding protein suppressor of hairless isoform X1
recombining binding protein suppressor of hairless isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
stromal interaction molecule 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
stromal interaction molecule 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
stromal interaction molecule 2 isoform X1
stromal interaction molecule 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GEKT01002708.1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 620 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: added 620 bases not found in genome assembly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
NACHT and WD repeat domain-containing protein 2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: NACHT and WD repeat domain-containing protein 2
uncharacterized protein C4orf19, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein C4orf19, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein C4orf19 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein C4orf19 isoform X2
procollagen C-endopeptidase enhancer 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 4, transcript variant X5
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 4, transcript variant X3
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 4, transcript variant X4
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 4, transcript variant X6
leucine rich repeats and calponin homology domain containing 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 4 isoform X5
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 4 isoform X4
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 4 isoform X6
inhibitor of growth protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of growth protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
inhibitor of growth protein 2 isoform X2
inhibitor of growth protein 2 isoform X1
structure-specific endonuclease subunit slx1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X12
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X7
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC111960330, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):INSD:GEKT01084663.1
sodium/potassium/calcium exchanger 2-like, transcript variant X2
sodium/potassium/calcium exchanger 2-like, transcript variant X1
sodium/potassium/calcium exchanger 2-like isoform X2
sodium/potassium/calcium exchanger 2-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
oligosaccharyltransferase complex subunit ostc
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase isoform X1
ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase, transcript variant X2
ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase isoform X2
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X10
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X12
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X11
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X6
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X7
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X5
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X9
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X18
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X19
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X14
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X13
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X16
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X1
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X4
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X3
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X17
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X8
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X2
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X20
collagen type XXV alpha 1 chain, transcript variant X15