Perognathus longimembris pacificus isolate PPM17 chromosome 24, ASM2315922v1, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Perognathus longimembris pacificus (Pacific pocket mouse)
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Euarchontoglires; Glires; Rodentia; Castorimorpha; Heteromyidae; Perognathinae; Perognathus.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM041287.1.\nAssembly name: ASM2315922v1\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the San Diego Zoo Wildlife\nAlliance on 2022/04/27. The original whole-genome shotgun project\nhas the accession JALGBO000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance\nAssembly Date :: 2021\nAssembly Method :: Peregrine v. JUNE-2020; HiRise v.\n JULY-2020; Juicer v. DECEMBER-2020;\n Juicebox Assembly Tools v. DECEMBER-2020\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 23.0x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Perognathus longimembris pacificus\n Annotation Release 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 9.0\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 4% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; substituted 2 bases at 2 genomic stop codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: uncharacterized protein LOC125341315
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 59% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: polyA evidence [ECO:0006239]
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD2A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
PR domain zinc finger protein 5 isoform X3
PR domain zinc finger protein 5 isoform X2
PR domain zinc finger protein 5 isoform X1
pyroglutamylated RFamide peptide receptor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pyroglutamylated RF-amide peptide receptor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
exosome component 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
exosome component 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
exosome complex component RRP45 isoform X1
exosome complex component RRP45 isoform X2
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 7, transcript variant X2
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 7, transcript variant X1
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 7 protein isoform X2
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 7 protein isoform X1
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 7 protein isoform X3
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 20 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 Proteins, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X2
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X1
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X8
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X7
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X5
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X6
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X3
short transient receptor potential channel 3 isoform X4
KIAA1109 ortholog, transcript variant X1
KIAA1109 ortholog, transcript variant X2
KIAA1109 ortholog, transcript variant X5
KIAA1109 ortholog, transcript variant X6
KIAA1109 ortholog, transcript variant X7
KIAA1109 ortholog, transcript variant X8
KIAA1109 ortholog, transcript variant X4
KIAA1109 ortholog, transcript variant X3
transmembrane protein KIAA1109 homolog isoform X1
transmembrane protein KIAA1109 homolog isoform X2
transmembrane protein KIAA1109 homolog isoform X5
transmembrane protein KIAA1109 homolog isoform X6
transmembrane protein KIAA1109 homolog isoform X7
transmembrane protein KIAA1109 homolog isoform X8
transmembrane protein KIAA1109 homolog isoform X4
transmembrane protein KIAA1109 homolog isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 7 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
adenosine deaminase domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ATP-dependent RNA helicase SUPV3L1, mitochondrial-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ATP-dependent RNA helicase SUPV3L1, mitochondrial-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nudix hydrolase 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
nudix hydrolase 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X motif 6 isoform X2
nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X motif 6 isoform X1
spermatogenesis associated 5, transcript variant X1
ATPase family protein 2 homolog isoform X1
spermatogenesis associated 5, transcript variant X2
ATPase family protein 2 homolog isoform X2
sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 1, transcript variant X1
sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 50
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ATP synthase subunit alpha, mitochondrial-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ATP synthase subunit alpha, mitochondrial-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00619
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 24% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 172 Proteins, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 11% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 35% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
rho-related GTP-binding protein RhoB-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: rho-related GTP-binding protein RhoB-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 Proteins, and 12% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 Proteins, and 6% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 8% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: protein SGT1 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 Proteins, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 4% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 4% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 3% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 179 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphodiesterase 5A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase isoform X1
phosphodiesterase 5A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphodiesterase 5A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase isoform X2
cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ubiquitin specific peptidase 53, transcript variant X2
ubiquitin specific peptidase 53, transcript variant X3
ubiquitin specific peptidase 53, transcript variant X1
inactive ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 53 isoform X2
inactive ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 53 isoform X1
inactive ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 53 isoform X3
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01210
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X1
SEC24 homolog D, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X2
protein transport protein Sec24D isoform X1
protein transport protein Sec24D isoform X2
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00561
methyltransferase 14, N6-adenosine-methyltransferase subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
N6-adenosine-methyltransferase non-catalytic subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00399
bifunctional heparan sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
bifunctional heparan sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 3 isoform X1
bifunctional heparan sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
bifunctional heparan sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 3 isoform X2
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00015
sodium-coupled neutral amino acid transporter 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: polyadenylate-binding protein 1-like
translocation associated membrane protein 1 like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins
translocating chain-associated membrane protein 1-like 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein GGA2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
bifunctional heparan sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 18 Proteins, and 17% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP glycosyltransferase 8, transcript variant X2
2-hydroxyacylsphingosine 1-beta-galactosyltransferase isoform X1
2-hydroxyacylsphingosine 1-beta-galactosyltransferase isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 84 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 83 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II delta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 74 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X3
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X1
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X2
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
La ribonucleoprotein 7, transcriptional regulator
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: 60S ribosomal protein L6-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
TRAF interacting protein with forkhead associated domain
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
TRAF-interacting protein with FHA domain-containing protein A
adaptor related protein complex 1 associated regulatory protein, transcript variant X3
adaptor related protein complex 1 associated regulatory protein, transcript variant X1
adaptor related protein complex 1 associated regulatory protein, transcript variant X2
AP-1 complex-associated regulatory protein isoform X3
AP-1 complex-associated regulatory protein isoform X1
AP-1 complex-associated regulatory protein isoform X2
family with sequence similarity 241 member A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
40S ribosomal protein S4, X isoform-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
paired like homeodomain 2, transcript variant X2
paired like homeodomain 2, transcript variant X1
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: glutamyl aminopeptidase
ELOVL fatty acid elongase 6, transcript variant X2
ELOVL fatty acid elongase 6, transcript variant X1
elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
epidermal growth factor, transcript variant X4
epidermal growth factor, transcript variant X1
epidermal growth factor, transcript variant X3
epidermal growth factor, transcript variant X2
epidermal growth factor, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine rich repeat, Ig-like and transmembrane domains 3
leucine-rich repeat, immunoglobulin-like domain and transmembrane domain-containing protein 3
retinal pigment epithelium-derived rhodopsin homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
H/ACA ribonucleoprotein complex subunit 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
group XIIA secretory phospholipase A2 isoform X4
group XIIA secretory phospholipase A2 isoform X5
mitochondrial calcium uniporter dominant negative subunit beta
calcium uniporter regulatory subunit MCUb, mitochondrial
SEC24 homolog B, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X2
SEC24 homolog B, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC24 homolog B, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC24 homolog B, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC24 homolog B, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X8
SEC24 homolog B, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC24 homolog B, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC24 homolog B, COPII coat complex component, transcript variant X3
protein transport protein Sec24B isoform X5
protein transport protein Sec24B isoform X8
protein transport protein Sec24B isoform X7
protein transport protein Sec24B isoform X4
protein transport protein Sec24B isoform X3
protein transport protein Sec24B isoform X6
protein transport protein Sec24B isoform X2
protein transport protein Sec24B isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
oligosaccharyltransferase complex non-catalytic subunit
oligosaccharyltransferase complex subunit OSTC
lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1, transcript variant X3
lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1, transcript variant X4
lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1, transcript variant X2
lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1, transcript variant X1
lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 isoform X1
lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 isoform X3
lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 isoform X2
lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 isoform X4
hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase, mitochondrial
sphingomyelin synthase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
sphingomyelin synthase 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
sphingomyelin synthase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
sphingomyelin synthase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sphingomyelin synthase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylcholine:ceramide cholinephosphotransferase 2 isoform X1
phosphatidylcholine:ceramide cholinephosphotransferase 2 isoform X2
3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1
bifunctional 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 1
dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 25% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 8% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 27% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
GIMAP family P-loop NTPase domain containing 1
aminoacyl tRNA synthetase complex interacting multifunctional protein 1, transcript variant X1
aminoacyl tRNA synthetase complex interacting multifunctional protein 1, transcript variant X2
aminoacyl tRNA synthase complex-interacting multifunctional protein 1
TBC1 domain containing kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain containing kinase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC domain-containing protein kinase-like protein isoform X1
TBC1 domain containing kinase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC domain-containing protein kinase-like protein isoform X2
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain containing, transcript variant X3
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain containing, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain-containing protein isoform X3
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain-containing protein isoform X1
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain containing, transcript variant X2
glutathione S-transferase C-terminal domain-containing protein isoform X2
integrator complex subunit 12, transcript variant X2
integrator complex subunit 12, transcript variant X1
integrator complex subunit 12 isoform X1
integrator complex subunit 12, transcript variant X3
integrator complex subunit 12 isoform X2
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
inorganic pyrophosphatase 2, transcript variant X1
inorganic pyrophosphatase 2, transcript variant X2
inorganic pyrophosphatase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
inorganic pyrophosphatase 2, mitochondrial isoform X1
inorganic pyrophosphatase 2, mitochondrial isoform X2
inorganic pyrophosphatase 2, mitochondrial isoform X3
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: methylcytosine dioxygenase TET2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 9 bases in 9 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 9 bases in 9 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: CXXC-type zinc finger protein 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 21 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein E, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein E, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centromere-associated protein E isoform X1
centromere-associated protein E isoform X2
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 2, transcript variant X2
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 2, transcript variant X1
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase type 2 isoform X1
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase type 2 isoform X2
solute carrier family 9 member B2, transcript variant X1
solute carrier family 9 member B2, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 9 member B2, transcript variant X2
sodium/hydrogen exchanger 9B2 isoform X1
sodium/hydrogen exchanger 9B2 isoform X3
sodium/hydrogen exchanger 9B2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 48% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CDGSH iron-sulfur domain-containing protein 2
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 D3, transcript variant X2
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 D3, transcript variant X5
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 D3, transcript variant X3
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 D3, transcript variant X1
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 D3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1, transcript variant X1
nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1, transcript variant X2
nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunit isoform X1
nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunit isoform X2
solute carrier family 39 member 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 39 member 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 39 member 8, transcript variant X3
solute carrier family 39 member 8, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
B cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats 1, transcript variant X2
B cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats 1, transcript variant X4
B cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats 1, transcript variant X3
B cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats 1, transcript variant X1
B-cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats isoform X3
B-cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats isoform X2
B-cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats isoform X1
protein phosphatase 3 catalytic subunit alpha, transcript variant X1
protein phosphatase 3 catalytic subunit alpha, transcript variant X2
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoform isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoform isoform X2
DNA damage-inducible transcript 4-like protein
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member B14, transcript variant X1
dnaJ homolog subfamily B member 14 isoform X1
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member B14, transcript variant X2
dnaJ homolog subfamily B member 14 isoform X2
late endosomal/lysosomal adaptor, MAPK and MTOR activator 3
dual adaptor of phosphotyrosine and 3-phosphoinositides 1, transcript variant X2
dual adaptor of phosphotyrosine and 3-phosphoinositides 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual adapter for phosphotyrosine and 3-phosphotyrosine and 3-phosphoinositide isoform X1
dual adapter for phosphotyrosine and 3-phosphotyrosine and 3-phosphoinositide isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microsomal triglyceride transfer protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
microsomal triglyceride transfer protein large subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
alcohol dehydrogenase 7 (class IV), mu or sigma polypeptide
all-trans-retinol dehydrogenase [NAD(+)] ADH7
alcohol dehydrogenase 1C (class I), gamma polypeptide
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00322
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
alcohol dehydrogenase 4 (class II), pi polypeptide
all-trans-retinol dehydrogenase [NAD(+)] ADH4
alcohol dehydrogenase 5 (class III), chi polypeptide
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E, transcript variant X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E, transcript variant X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E isoform X1
Rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1, transcript variant X4
Rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1, transcript variant X2
Rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1, transcript variant X1
Rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1, transcript variant X3
Rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1, transcript variant X5
rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1 isoform X4
rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1 isoform X3
rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1 isoform X2
rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1 isoform X1
rap1 GTPase-GDP dissociation stimulator 1 isoform X5
sperm tail PG-rich repeat containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sperm tail PG-rich repeat containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sperm tail PG-rich repeat containing 2, transcript variant X7
sperm tail PG-rich repeat containing 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
sperm tail PG-rich repeat containing 2, transcript variant X5
sperm tail PG-rich repeat containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
sperm tail PG-rich repeat containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sperm-tail PG-rich repeat-containing protein 2 isoform X1
sperm-tail PG-rich repeat-containing protein 2 isoform X2
sperm-tail PG-rich repeat-containing protein 2 isoform X5
sperm-tail PG-rich repeat-containing protein 2 isoform X7
sperm-tail PG-rich repeat-containing protein 2 isoform X4
sperm-tail PG-rich repeat-containing protein 2 isoform X6
sperm-tail PG-rich repeat-containing protein 2 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha 2, transcript variant X2
pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins
pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit alpha, testis-specific form, mitochondrial isoform X2
pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit alpha, testis-specific form, mitochondrial isoform X1
unc-5 netrin receptor C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
unc-5 netrin receptor C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 49 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1B, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1B, transcript variant X7
bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 49 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1B, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 50 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 49 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 49 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1B, transcript variant X6
bone morphogenetic protein receptor type-1B isoform X1
bone morphogenetic protein receptor type-1B isoform X2
PDZ and LIM domain 5, transcript variant X3
PDZ and LIM domain 5, transcript variant X2
PDZ and LIM domain 5, transcript variant X7
PDZ and LIM domain 5, transcript variant X1
PDZ and LIM domain 5, transcript variant X4
PDZ and LIM domain 5, transcript variant X6
PDZ and LIM domain 5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, containing DEAD/H box 1, transcript variant X1
SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, containing DEAD/H box 1, transcript variant X2
SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily A containing DEAD/H box 1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
glutamate ionotropic receptor delta type subunit 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamate receptor ionotropic, delta-2 isoform X2
glutamate ionotropic receptor delta type subunit 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamate ionotropic receptor delta type subunit 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamate receptor ionotropic, delta-2 isoform X3
glutamate receptor ionotropic, delta-2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
serine-rich coiled-coil domain-containing protein 1
G protein-regulated inducer of neurite outgrowth 3
tigger transposable element-derived protein 2
family with sequence similarity 13 member A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 13 member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 13 member A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 13 member A, transcript variant X4
family with sequence similarity 13 member A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: aprataxin and PNK-like factor
family with sequence similarity 13 member A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 13 member A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 3, transcript variant X2
HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 3, transcript variant X1
HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 3, transcript variant X3
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HERC3 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HERC3 isoform X2
HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 3, transcript variant X5
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HERC3 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class Y
phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase subunit Y
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 36% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 5, transcript variant X2
HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 5, transcript variant X1
E3 ISG15--protein ligase HERC5 isoform X1
E3 ISG15--protein ligase HERC5 isoform X2
RNA binding motif protein 46, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
probable RNA-binding protein 46 isoform X1
RNA binding motif protein 46, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
probable RNA-binding protein 46 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
toll like receptor 2, transcript variant X1
toll like receptor 2, transcript variant X2
transmembrane 131 like, transcript variant X5
transmembrane 131 like, transcript variant X3
transmembrane 131 like, transcript variant X8
transmembrane 131 like, transcript variant X2
transmembrane 131 like, transcript variant X4
transmembrane 131 like, transcript variant X6
transmembrane 131 like, transcript variant X1
transmembrane 131 like, transcript variant X7
transmembrane protein 131-like isoform X5
transmembrane protein 131-like isoform X3
transmembrane protein 131-like isoform X8
transmembrane protein 131-like isoform X2
transmembrane protein 131-like isoform X4
transmembrane protein 131-like isoform X6
transmembrane protein 131-like isoform X1
transmembrane protein 131-like isoform X7
transmembrane 131 like, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 131-like isoform X9
meiotic nuclear division protein 1 homolog
tripartite motif containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif containing 2, transcript variant X2
tripartite motif containing 2, transcript variant X6
tripartite motif-containing protein 2 isoform X1
tripartite motif-containing protein 2 isoform X3
tripartite motif containing 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripartite motif-containing protein 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
FH2 domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
FH2 domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
FH2 domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP ribosylation factor interacting protein 1, transcript variant X3
ADP ribosylation factor interacting protein 1, transcript variant X2
ADP ribosylation factor interacting protein 1, transcript variant X4
ADP ribosylation factor interacting protein 1, transcript variant X1
tigger transposable element derived 4, transcript variant X1
tigger transposable element derived 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tigger transposable element-derived protein 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA glutamic acid (anticodon UUC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7, transcript variant X2
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7, transcript variant X5
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7, transcript variant X4
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7, transcript variant X1
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7, transcript variant X3
F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 7 isoform X1
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7, transcript variant X6
F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 7 isoform X2
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7, transcript variant X7
F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 7 isoform X3
glutamyl-tRNA amidotransferase subunit B
glutamyl-tRNA(Gln) amidotransferase subunit B, mitochondrial
FHF complex subunit HOOK interacting protein 1A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 8% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SH3 domain containing 19, transcript variant X1
SH3 domain containing 19, transcript variant X2
SH3 domain-containing protein 19 isoform X1
SH3 domain-containing protein 19 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 4 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 4 codons; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00071
transfer RNA valine (anticodon GAC); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LPS responsive beige-like anchor protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
lipopolysaccharide-responsive and beige-like anchor protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 2, transcript variant X1
nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 10, transcript variant X3
rho GTPase-activating protein 10 isoform X2
rho GTPase-activating protein 10 isoform X1
rho GTPase-activating protein 10 isoform X3
protein arginine methyltransferase 9, transcript variant X1
protein arginine methyltransferase 9, transcript variant X2
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 9 isoform X1
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 9 isoform X2
protein arginine methyltransferase 9, transcript variant X3
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 9 isoform X3
protein arginine methyltransferase 9, transcript variant X5
protein arginine methyltransferase 9, transcript variant X4
protein arginine methyltransferase 9, transcript variant X6
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 9 isoform X4
transmembrane protein 184C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 184C, transcript variant X2
endothelin receptor type A, transcript variant X1
endothelin receptor type A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 37% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 Proteins
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: POU domain, class 4, transcription factor 2
solute carrier family 10 member 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 10 member 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 10 member 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 10 member 7, transcript variant X6
solute carrier family 10 member 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 10 member 7, transcript variant X7
solute carrier family 10 member 7, transcript variant X5
solute carrier family 10 member 7, transcript variant X8
solute carrier family 10 member 7, transcript variant X9
sodium/bile acid cotransporter 7 isoform X1
sodium/bile acid cotransporter 7 isoform X3
sodium/bile acid cotransporter 7 isoform X2
sodium/bile acid cotransporter 7 isoform X4
sodium/bile acid cotransporter 7 isoform X5
sodium/bile acid cotransporter 7 isoform X6
sodium/bile acid cotransporter 7 isoform X7
LSM6 homolog, U6 small nuclear RNA and mRNA degradation associated, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
LSM6 homolog, U6 small nuclear RNA and mRNA degradation associated, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
LSM6 homolog, U6 small nuclear RNA and mRNA degradation associated, transcript variant X2
LSM6 homolog, U6 small nuclear RNA and mRNA degradation associated, transcript variant X1
U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm6
zinc finger protein 827, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 827, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 827, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 827, transcript variant X3
zinc finger protein 827, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 827, transcript variant X5
metabolism of cobalamin associated A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
metabolism of cobalamin associated A, transcript variant X4
metabolism of cobalamin associated A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
metabolism of cobalamin associated A, transcript variant X1
metabolism of cobalamin associated A, transcript variant X5
methylmalonic aciduria type A protein, mitochondrial isoform X1
methylmalonic aciduria type A protein, mitochondrial isoform X2
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 1
OTU deubiquitinase 4, transcript variant X6
OTU deubiquitinase 4, transcript variant X3
OTU deubiquitinase 4, transcript variant X7
OTU deubiquitinase 4, transcript variant X4
OTU deubiquitinase 4, transcript variant X5
OTU deubiquitinase 4, transcript variant X1
OTU deubiquitinase 4, transcript variant X2
OTU domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
OTU domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
OTU domain-containing protein 4 isoform X6
OTU domain-containing protein 4 isoform X7
OTU domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
OTU domain-containing protein 4 isoform X4
OTU domain-containing protein 4 isoform X5
ATP binding cassette subfamily E member 1
ATP-binding cassette sub-family E member 1
anaphase promoting complex subunit 10, transcript variant X2
anaphase promoting complex subunit 10, transcript variant X1
SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 5
SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily A member 5
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X4
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X6
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X7
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X8
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X5
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
GRB2 associated binding protein 1, transcript variant X3
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X8
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X6
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X7
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X4
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X5
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X2
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X3
GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 isoform X1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 38
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X1
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X2
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X3
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X5
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X6
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X4
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X4
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X8
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X1
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X2
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X3
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X5
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X6
inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type II B, transcript variant X7
inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 4 bases in 4 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 4 bases in 4 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: TBC1 domain family member 9
uncoupling protein 1, transcript variant X1
uncoupling protein 1, transcript variant X2
mitochondrial brown fat uncoupling protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
alpha-1,3-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-like protein MGAT4D
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X5
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X4
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X3
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X1
short coiled-coil protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
mastermind like transcriptional coactivator 3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: mastermind-like protein 3
SET domain containing 7, histone lysine methyltransferase
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETD7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X2
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X1
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X2
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X1
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit C1
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 subunit C1, mitochondrial
mitochondria localized glutamic acid rich protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X3
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X2
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X1
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X4
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X1
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X2
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X8
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X7
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X6
E74 like ETS transcription factor 2, transcript variant X5
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X3
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X4
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-2 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(A) binding protein cytoplasmic 4 like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
chromosome 24 C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X3
chromosome 24 C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X2
chromosome 24 C4orf33 homolog, transcript variant X1
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1, transcript variant X1
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1 isoform X1
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sodium channel and clathrin linker 1 isoform X2
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X4
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X3
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X1
jade family PHD finger 1, transcript variant X2
basic salivary proline-rich protein 4-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
progesterone receptor membrane component 2
membrane-associated progesterone receptor component 2
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X2
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X4
La ribonucleoprotein 1B, transcript variant X3
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X1
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X3
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X2
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X6
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X4
abhydrolase domain containing 18, transcript variant X5
major facilitator superfamily domain containing 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 8
polo like kinase 4, transcript variant X2
polo like kinase 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
polo like kinase 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase PLK4 isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase PLK4 isoform X4
serine/threonine-protein kinase PLK4 isoform X1
polo like kinase 4, transcript variant X3
serine/threonine-protein kinase PLK4 isoform X3
heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 4 like, transcript variant X2
heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 4 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
inturned planar cell polarity protein, transcript variant X2
inturned planar cell polarity protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns