Perognathus longimembris pacificus isolate PPM17 chromosome 18, ASM2315922v1, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Perognathus longimembris pacificus (Pacific pocket mouse)
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Euarchontoglires; Glires; Rodentia; Castorimorpha; Heteromyidae; Perognathinae; Perognathus.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM041281.1.\nAssembly name: ASM2315922v1\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the San Diego Zoo Wildlife\nAlliance on 2022/04/27. The original whole-genome shotgun project\nhas the accession JALGBO000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance\nAssembly Date :: 2021\nAssembly Method :: Peregrine v. JUNE-2020; HiRise v.\n JULY-2020; Juicer v. DECEMBER-2020;\n Juicebox Assembly Tools v. DECEMBER-2020\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 23.0x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Perognathus longimembris pacificus\n Annotation Release 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 9.0\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: polyA evidence [ECO:0006239]
RAB4A, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X1
RAB4A, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X2
centriole, cilia and spindle associated protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centriole, cilia and spindle associated protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
centriole, cilia and spindle-associated protein isoform X1
centriole, cilia and spindle-associated protein isoform X2
ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 10, transcript variant X4
ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 10, transcript variant X3
ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 10, transcript variant X2
ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 10, transcript variant X1
ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 10, mitochondrial isoform X3
ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 10, mitochondrial isoform X2
ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 10, mitochondrial isoform X1
ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 10, mitochondrial isoform X4
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 5 like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 5 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 5 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
TAF5-like RNA polymerase II p300/CBP-associated factor-associated factor 65 kDa subunit 5L isoform X1
TAF5-like RNA polymerase II p300/CBP-associated factor-associated factor 65 kDa subunit 5L isoform X2
URB2 ribosome biogenesis homolog, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
URB2 ribosome biogenesis homolog, transcript variant X2
unhealthy ribosome biogenesis protein 2 homolog
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
piggyBac transposable element derived 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
piggyBac transposable element derived 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
piggyBac transposable element derived 5, transcript variant X3
piggyBac transposable element-derived protein 5 isoform X1
piggyBac transposable element-derived protein 5 isoform X2
conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: uncharacterized protein C1orf198 homolog
uncharacterized protein C1orf198 homolog
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 13, transcript variant X6
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 13, transcript variant X5
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 13, transcript variant X4
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 13, transcript variant X3
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 13, transcript variant X2
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 13, transcript variant X1
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 13, transcript variant X8
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 13 isoform X6
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 13 isoform X5
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 13 isoform X4
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 13 isoform X3
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 13 isoform X2
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 13 isoform X1
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 13 isoform X8
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 13, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 13 isoform X9
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 13, transcript variant X7
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 13 isoform X7
ARV1 homolog, fatty acid homeostasis modulator, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ARV1 homolog, fatty acid homeostasis modulator, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 89 member A
tripartite motif containing 67, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 59% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tripartite motif containing 67, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tripartite motif containing 67, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 59% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tripartite motif-containing protein 67 isoform X2
tripartite motif-containing protein 67 isoform X1
tripartite motif-containing protein 67 isoform X3
chromosome 18 C1orf131 homolog, transcript variant X2
chromosome 18 C1orf131 homolog, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein C1orf131 homolog isoform X2
uncharacterized protein C1orf131 homolog isoform X1
glyceronephosphate O-acyltransferase, transcript variant X2
glyceronephosphate O-acyltransferase, transcript variant X1
dihydroxyacetone phosphate acyltransferase isoform X2
dihydroxyacetone phosphate acyltransferase isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
egl-9 family hypoxia inducible factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: DNA-dependent metalloprotease SPRTN
egl-9 family hypoxia inducible factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
signal induced proliferation associated 1 like 2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: signal-induced proliferation-associated 1-like protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nucleoside-triphosphatase, cancer-related, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleoside-triphosphatase, cancer-related, transcript variant X1
nucleoside-triphosphatase, cancer-related, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
cancer-related nucleoside-triphosphatase isoform X1
cancer-related nucleoside-triphosphatase isoform X2
potassium two pore domain channel subfamily K member 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: potassium channel subfamily K member 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 6 homolog
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 8 bases in 8 codons; deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 8 bases in 8 codons; deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: probable methyltransferase TARBP1
interferon regulatory factor 2 binding protein 2
interferon regulatory factor 2-binding protein 2
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 20
mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM20 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00397
AT-rich interaction domain 4B, transcript variant X2
AT-rich interaction domain 4B, transcript variant X3
AT-rich interaction domain 4B, transcript variant X5
AT-rich interaction domain 4B, transcript variant X4
AT-rich interaction domain 4B, transcript variant X1
AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 4B isoform X2
AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 4B isoform X4
AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 4B isoform X3
AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 4B isoform X1
AT-rich interaction domain 4B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 4B isoform X5
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2, transcript variant X3
beta-1,3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2, transcript variant X1
UDP-GalNAc:beta-1, 3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2 isoform X2
UDP-GalNAc:beta-1, 3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2 isoform X1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00418
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(O) subunit gamma-4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductase 1 beta
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ectodysplasin-A receptor-associated adapter protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
HEAT repeat containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
HEAT repeat containing 1, transcript variant X1
5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: methionine synthase
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ryanodine receptor 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 4 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 4 bases in 4 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3
zinc finger MYND-type containing 11, transcript variant X5
zinc finger MYND-type containing 11, transcript variant X1
zinc finger MYND-type containing 11, transcript variant X2
zinc finger MYND-type containing 11, transcript variant X3
zinc finger MYND-type containing 11, transcript variant X4
zinc finger MYND-type containing 11, transcript variant X6
zinc finger MYND domain-containing protein 11 isoform X1
zinc finger MYND domain-containing protein 11 isoform X2
zinc finger MYND domain-containing protein 11 isoform X3
zinc finger MYND domain-containing protein 11 isoform X4
zinc finger MYND domain-containing protein 11 isoform X5
zinc finger MYND domain-containing protein 11 isoform X6
zinc finger MYND-type containing 11, transcript variant X7
zinc finger MYND domain-containing protein 11 isoform X7
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: disco-interacting protein 2 homolog C
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 4B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 4B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 4B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
La ribonucleoprotein 4B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
isopentenyl-diphosphate delta-isomerase 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
isopentenyl-diphosphate Delta-isomerase 1, transcript variant X1
isopentenyl-diphosphate Delta-isomerase 1, transcript variant X2
isopentenyl-diphosphate Delta-isomerase 1 isoform X1
isopentenyl-diphosphate Delta-isomerase 1 isoform X2
WD repeat domain 37, transcript variant X1
WD repeat-containing protein 37 isoform X1
WD repeat domain 37, transcript variant X2
WD repeat-containing protein 37 isoform X2
adenosine deaminase RNA specific B2 (inactive)
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00012
protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: ATP-dependent 6-phosphofructokinase, platelet type
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X6
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X13
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3-like isoform X6
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3-like isoform X13
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X11
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X8
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X3
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X7
prostaglandin-E(2) 9-reductase-like isoform X11
prostaglandin-E(2) 9-reductase-like isoform X8
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C23-like protein isoform X3
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like isoform X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C13-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 119 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X10
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X9
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X4
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X2
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X14
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like isoform X10
prostaglandin-E(2) 9-reductase-like isoform X9
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C13-like isoform X4
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C23-like protein isoform X2
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C13-like isoform X14
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X1
prostaglandin-E(2) 9-reductase-like isoform X1
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
prostaglandin-E(2) 9-reductase-like isoform X12
estradiol 17 beta-dehydrogenase 5-like isoform X15
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C4-like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 120 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3-like isoform X5
aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 111 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
neuroepithelial cell transforming 1, transcript variant X1
neuroepithelial cell transforming 1, transcript variant X2
neuroepithelial cell-transforming gene 1 protein isoform X1
neuroepithelial cell-transforming gene 1 protein isoform X2
neuroepithelial cell transforming 1, transcript variant X3
neuroepithelial cell-transforming gene 1 protein isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 13
transcription activation suppressor family member 2
ankyrin repeat domain 16, transcript variant X1
ankyrin repeat domain 16, transcript variant X2
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 16 isoform X1
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 16 isoform X2
F-box DNA helicase 1, transcript variant X3
F-box DNA helicase 1, transcript variant X5
F-box DNA helicase 1, transcript variant X2
F-box DNA helicase 1, transcript variant X4
F-box DNA helicase 1, transcript variant X1
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00156
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 3 isoform X1
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 3 isoform X2
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase 3 isoform X3
protein kinase C theta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C theta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C theta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: scm-like with four MBT domains protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H5-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
scm-like with four MBT domains protein 2, transcript variant X2
scm-like with four MBT domains protein 2, transcript variant X1
scm-like with four MBT domains protein 2 isoform X2
scm-like with four MBT domains protein 2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 36 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 Proteins, and 25% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H2
ATP synthase F1 subunit gamma, transcript variant X1
ATP synthase F1 subunit gamma, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase F1 subunit gamma, transcript variant X3
ATP synthase F1 subunit gamma, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP synthase subunit gamma, mitochondrial isoform X1
ATP synthase subunit gamma, mitochondrial isoform X2
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 3, transcript variant X1
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 3 isoform X1
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 3, transcript variant X2
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 3 isoform X2
GATA binding protein 3, transcript variant X1
GATA binding protein 3, transcript variant X2
GATA binding protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
GATA binding protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
trans-acting T-cell-specific transcription factor GATA-3 isoform X1
trans-acting T-cell-specific transcription factor GATA-3 isoform X2
trans-acting T-cell-specific transcription factor GATA-3 isoform X3
trans-acting T-cell-specific transcription factor GATA-3 isoform X4
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X12
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X1
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X13
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X2
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X4
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X1
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X13
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X2
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X4
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X12
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X10
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X11
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X3
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X10
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X3
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X11
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X5
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X7
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X6
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X8
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X5
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X7
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X6
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X8
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2, transcript variant X9
CUGBP Elav-like family member 2 isoform X9
USP6 N-terminal like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
USP6 N-terminal like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
enoyl-CoA hydratase domain-containing protein 3, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 10% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
UPF2 regulator of nonsense mediated mRNA decay, transcript variant X1
regulator of nonsense transcripts 2 isoform X1
UPF2 regulator of nonsense mediated mRNA decay, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of nonsense transcripts 2 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 31% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: PRAME family member 12-like
dehydrogenase E1 and transketolase domain containing 1
probable 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase E1 component DHKTD1, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein transport protein Sec61 subunit alpha
nudix hydrolase 5, transcript variant X1
nudix hydrolase 5, transcript variant X2
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase ID, transcript variant X3
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase ID, transcript variant X1
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase ID, transcript variant X2
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase ID, transcript variant X4
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase ID, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase ID, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type 1D isoform X1
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type 1D isoform X2
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type 1D isoform X4
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type 1D isoform X5
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type 1D isoform X6
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type 1D isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
minichromosome maintenance 10 replication initiation factor
upper zone of growth plate and cartilage matrix associated
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
unique cartilage matrix-associated protein
phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase, peroxisomal-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: selenide, water dikinase 1
BEN domain containing 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
BEN domain containing 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
BEN domain containing 7, transcript variant X5
BEN domain containing 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
BEN domain containing 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
BEN domain-containing protein 7 isoform X5
BEN domain-containing protein 7 isoform X4
BEN domain-containing protein 7 isoform X3
BEN domain-containing protein 7 isoform X2
BEN domain-containing protein 7 isoform X1
FERM domain containing 4A, transcript variant X2
FERM domain containing 4A, transcript variant X1
FERM domain containing 4A, transcript variant X4
FERM domain containing 4A, transcript variant X3
FERM domain-containing protein 4A isoform X2
FERM domain-containing protein 4A isoform X1
FERM domain-containing protein 4A isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
family with sequence similarity 107 member B, transcript variant X4
family with sequence similarity 107 member B, transcript variant X3
family with sequence similarity 107 member B, transcript variant X1
family with sequence similarity 107 member B, transcript variant X2
family with sequence similarity 107 member B, transcript variant X5
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 29
SUV39H2 histone lysine methyltransferase, transcript variant X2
SUV39H2 histone lysine methyltransferase, transcript variant X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SUV39H2 isoform X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SUV39H2 isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
meiosis expressed gene 1 protein homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
S-acyl fatty acid synthase thioesterase, medium chain
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
acyl-CoA-binding domain-containing protein 7
ribonuclease P/MRP subunit p38, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ribonuclease P/MRP subunit p38, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-myristoyltransferase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-myristoyltransferase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycylpeptide N-tetradecanoyltransferase 2 isoform X1
glycylpeptide N-tetradecanoyltransferase 2 isoform X2
family with sequence similarity 171 member A1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
MINDY lysine 48 deubiquitinase 3, transcript variant X1
MINDY lysine 48 deubiquitinase 3, transcript variant X4
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase MINDY-3 isoform X1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase MINDY-3 isoform X3
MINDY lysine 48 deubiquitinase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
MINDY lysine 48 deubiquitinase 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase MINDY-3 isoform X2
DNA-directed RNA polymerases I, II, and III subunit RPABC4-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphotriesterase related, transcript variant X2
phosphotriesterase related, transcript variant X1
Ras suppressor protein 1, transcript variant X1
Ras suppressor protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA aspartic acid methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
tRNA aspartic acid methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
tRNA (cytosine(38)-C(5))-methyltransferase isoform X1
tRNA (cytosine(38)-C(5))-methyltransferase isoform X2
ST8 alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminide alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 6
3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 1, transcript variant X2
3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 1, transcript variant X1
very-long-chain (3R)-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 1 isoform X2
very-long-chain (3R)-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 28% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
solute carrier family 39 member 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
solute carrier family 39 member 12, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 39 member 12, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-2 isoform X1
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-2 isoform X2
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-2 isoform X6
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-2 isoform X3
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-2 isoform X4
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-2 isoform X9
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-2 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 12 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-2 isoform X7
voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-2 isoform X8
NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA (cytosine(72)-C(5))-methyltransferase NSUN6 isoform X2
tRNA (cytosine(72)-C(5))-methyltransferase NSUN6 isoform X1
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 5B, transcript variant X2
ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 5B isoform X2
ADP ribosylation factor like GTPase 5B, transcript variant X1
ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 5B isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins
par-3 family cell polarity regulator, transcript variant X8
par-3 family cell polarity regulator, transcript variant X6
par-3 family cell polarity regulator, transcript variant X3
par-3 family cell polarity regulator, transcript variant X7
par-3 family cell polarity regulator, transcript variant X5
par-3 family cell polarity regulator, transcript variant X2
par-3 family cell polarity regulator, transcript variant X4
par-3 family cell polarity regulator, transcript variant X1
partitioning defective 3 homolog isoform X8
partitioning defective 3 homolog isoform X6
partitioning defective 3 homolog isoform X3
partitioning defective 3 homolog isoform X7
partitioning defective 3 homolog isoform X5
partitioning defective 3 homolog isoform X2
partitioning defective 3 homolog isoform X4
partitioning defective 3 homolog isoform X1
par-3 family cell polarity regulator, transcript variant X11
par-3 family cell polarity regulator, transcript variant X10
par-3 family cell polarity regulator, transcript variant X9
partitioning defective 3 homolog isoform X11
partitioning defective 3 homolog isoform X10
partitioning defective 3 homolog isoform X9
par-3 family cell polarity regulator, transcript variant X12
partitioning defective 3 homolog isoform X12
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00265
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X1
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X2
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X4
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X5
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X8
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X1
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X2
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X4
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X5
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X8
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X3
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X6
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X7
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X6
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X7
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X10
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X12
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X11
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X10
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X12
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X9
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X11
cAMP responsive element modulator, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
cAMP-responsive element modulator isoform X13
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00004
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00561
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 20A3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 144B-like
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 26-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
POTE ankyrin domain family member C-like, transcript variant X1
POTE ankyrin domain family member C-like, transcript variant X3
POTE ankyrin domain family member C-like
POTE ankyrin domain family member C-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein kinase, DNA-activated, catalytic subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit
minichromosome maintenance complex component 4
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 3 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: DNA replication licensing factor MCM4
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 variant 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 1
glutathione-specific gamma-glutamylcyclotransferase 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
snail family transcriptional repressor 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
WW domain containing adaptor with coiled-coil, transcript variant X4
WW domain containing adaptor with coiled-coil, transcript variant X1
WW domain containing adaptor with coiled-coil, transcript variant X2
WW domain containing adaptor with coiled-coil, transcript variant X3
WW domain containing adaptor with coiled-coil, transcript variant X5
WW domain containing adaptor with coiled-coil, transcript variant X8
WW domain containing adaptor with coiled-coil, transcript variant X7
WW domain containing adaptor with coiled-coil, transcript variant X6
WW domain-containing adapter protein with coiled-coil isoform X6
WW domain-containing adapter protein with coiled-coil isoform X3
WW domain-containing adapter protein with coiled-coil isoform X5
WW domain-containing adapter protein with coiled-coil isoform X2
WW domain-containing adapter protein with coiled-coil isoform X1
WW domain-containing adapter protein with coiled-coil isoform X4
MAGUK p55 scaffold protein 7, transcript variant X1
MAGUK p55 scaffold protein 7, transcript variant X2
outer dynein arm docking complex subunit 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
outer dynein arm-docking complex subunit 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 44% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
BMP and activin membrane bound inhibitor
BMP and activin membrane-bound inhibitor homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
junctional cadherin 5 associated, transcript variant X3
junctional cadherin 5 associated, transcript variant X2
junctional cadherin 5 associated, transcript variant X1
junctional protein associated with coronary artery disease
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(O) subunit gamma-10-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger protein 438, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 438, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 438, transcript variant X7
zinc finger protein 438, transcript variant X2
zinc finger protein 438, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 438, transcript variant X10
zinc finger protein 438, transcript variant X1
zinc finger protein 438, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 438, transcript variant X4
zinc finger protein 438, transcript variant X5
zinc finger protein 438, transcript variant X9
zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1, transcript variant X5
zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1, transcript variant X1
zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1, transcript variant X2
zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1, transcript variant X4
zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1, transcript variant X3
zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 isoform X1
zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 isoform X2
zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 isoform X3
Rho GTPase activating protein 12, transcript variant X4
Rho GTPase activating protein 12, transcript variant X3
Rho GTPase activating protein 12, transcript variant X2
Rho GTPase activating protein 12, transcript variant X1
Rho GTPase activating protein 12, transcript variant X5
rho GTPase-activating protein 12 isoform X4
rho GTPase-activating protein 12 isoform X5
rho GTPase-activating protein 12 isoform X3
rho GTPase-activating protein 12 isoform X2
rho GTPase-activating protein 12 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 Proteins, and 33% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
enhancer of polycomb homolog 1, transcript variant X1
enhancer of polycomb homolog 1, transcript variant X3
enhancer of polycomb homolog 1, transcript variant X2
enhancer of polycomb homolog 1 isoform X3
enhancer of polycomb homolog 1 isoform X1
enhancer of polycomb homolog 1 isoform X2
enhancer of polycomb homolog 1, transcript variant X4
enhancer of polycomb homolog 1 isoform X4
YME1 like 1 ATPase, transcript variant X3
YME1 like 1 ATPase, transcript variant X2
YME1 like 1 ATPase, transcript variant X1
ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease YME1L1 isoform X2
ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease YME1L1 isoform X1
ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease YME1L1 isoform X3
microtubule associated serine/threonine kinase like, transcript variant X1
microtubule associated serine/threonine kinase like, transcript variant X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase greatwall isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase greatwall isoform X2
acyl-CoA binding domain containing 5, transcript variant X4
acyl-CoA binding domain containing 5, transcript variant X3
acyl-CoA binding domain containing 5, transcript variant X5
acyl-CoA binding domain containing 5, transcript variant X2
acyl-CoA binding domain containing 5, transcript variant X1
acyl-CoA-binding domain-containing protein 5 isoform X2
acyl-CoA-binding domain-containing protein 5 isoform X1
acyl-CoA-binding domain-containing protein 5 isoform X4
acyl-CoA-binding domain-containing protein 5 isoform X3
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
abl interactor 1, transcript variant X11
abl interactor 1, transcript variant X12
abl interactor 1, transcript variant X10
decaprenyl diphosphate synthase subunit 1, transcript variant X1
decaprenyl diphosphate synthase subunit 1, transcript variant X2
all trans-polyprenyl-diphosphate synthase PDSS1 isoform X1
all trans-polyprenyl-diphosphate synthase PDSS1 isoform X2
decaprenyl diphosphate synthase subunit 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00406
amyloid beta precursor protein binding family B member 1 interacting protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
amyloid beta A4 precursor protein-binding family B member 1-interacting protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 18 Proteins, and 6% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 14% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
enkurin, TRPC channel interacting protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphoribosyl transferase domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
phosphoribosyltransferase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
phosphoribosyl transferase domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
phosphoribosyltransferase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
Rho GTPase activating protein 21, transcript variant X1
Rho GTPase activating protein 21, transcript variant X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: sickle tail protein homolog
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00432
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: OTU domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
uncharacterized protein C10orf67 homolog, mitochondrial
pancreas associated transcription factor 1a
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 15% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
pancreas transcription factor 1 subunit alpha
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
methionine-R-sulfoxide reductase B2, mitochondrial
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01210
phosphatidylinositol-5-phosphate 4-kinase type 2 alpha
phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate 4-kinase type-2 alpha
sperm associated antigen 6, transcript variant X2
sperm associated antigen 6, transcript variant X1
BMI1 proto-oncogene, polycomb ring finger
COMM domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
COMM domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
COMM domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
COMM domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA asparagine (anticodon GUU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C1
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X8
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X6
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X7
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X1
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X9
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X16
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X15
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X4
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X5
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X3
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X2
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X12
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X13
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X10
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X14
MLLT10 histone lysine methyltransferase DOT1L cofactor, transcript variant X11
SKI/DACH domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI/DACH domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI/DACH domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI/DACH domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI/DACH domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI/DACH domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SKI/DACH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
SKI/DACH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
SKI/DACH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
MAM and LDL receptor class A domain containing 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
MAM and LDL-receptor class A domain-containing protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 35% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 27% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 17% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 27% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
complement component 1 Q subcomponent-binding protein, mitochondrial-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: complement component 1 Q subcomponent-binding protein, mitochondrial-like
adhesion G protein-coupled receptor B3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 24% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 14% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
telomeric repeat-binding factor 2-interacting protein 1-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: telomeric repeat-binding factor 2-interacting protein 1-like
guanylate-binding protein 1-like, transcript variant X4
guanylate-binding protein 1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
guanylate-binding protein 1-like, transcript variant X3
guanylate-binding protein 1-like isoform X1
guanylate-binding protein 1-like isoform X3
guanylate-binding protein 1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 6% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
guanylate-binding protein 1-like isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 17% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 25% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 26% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 8% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: dedicator of cytokinesis protein 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 10% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 31% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 9% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 12% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 15% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 25% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00045
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 37% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 42% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
splicing factor, proline- and glutamine-rich-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 2 codons
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 2 codons; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: splicing factor, proline- and glutamine-rich-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 2% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 17% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 26% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 37% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 6% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 Proteins, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 15% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 15% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 44% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 44% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 17% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 6% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 14% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 8% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein 639-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 4 bases in 3 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: olfactory receptor 1174-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 39% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein ZFP2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 42% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
YTH domain-containing family protein 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF01960
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 36% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 54% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 25% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 9% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sarcolemmal membrane-associated protein-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: sarcolemmal membrane-associated protein-like
type II inositol 3,4-bisphosphate 4-phosphatase-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 34% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 36% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 6% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96 Proteins, and 9% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 94 Proteins, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK4-like, transcript variant X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK4-like isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK4-like, transcript variant X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK4-like isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase ULK4-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 10% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 49% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 29% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 108 Proteins
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: olfactory receptor 8B3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC125367232, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC125367232, transcript variant X2
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein OZF-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 Proteins, and 11% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
germinal-center associated nuclear protein-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 85 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 8% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins, and 39% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 3% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: germinal-center associated nuclear protein-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 33% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 36% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 6% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 11% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 24% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 25-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 25-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 25-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 25-like isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 25-like isoform X1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 60% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
endogenous retrovirus group K member 9 Gag polyprotein-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 48% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 70 Proteins, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 Proteins, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 Proteins, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 20% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 27% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 Proteins, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 3% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 3% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 11% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments