Motacilla alba alba isolate MOTALB_02 chromosome 25, Motacilla_alba_V1.0_pri, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Archelosauria; Archosauria; Dinosauria; Saurischia; Theropoda; Coelurosauria; Aves; Neognathae; Passeriformes; Passeroidea; Motacillidae; Motacilla.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM027499.1.\nAssembly name: Motacilla_alba_V1.0_pri\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Uppsala University on\n2020/12/08. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession JACXWE000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Uppsala University\nAssembly Date :: SEP-2020\nAssembly Method :: FALCON v. 2.2.3; FALCON-Unzip v. 2.2.3;\n Juicer v. 1.6; 3D-DNA v. 180922\nAssembly Name :: Motacilla_alba_V1.0_pri\nDiploid :: Principal Pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 18x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel II HiFi\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Motacilla alba alba Annotation\n Release 100\nAnnotation Version :: 100\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.5\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
pogo transposable element derived with ZNF domain, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
pogo transposable element derived with ZNF domain, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
pogo transposable element with ZNF domain isoform X2
pogo transposable element with ZNF domain isoform X1
methanethiol oxidase-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
methanethiol oxidase-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X5
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X8
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulatory factor X5, transcript variant X9
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta isoform X3
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta isoform X2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 5 bases in 3 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 20 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 5 bases in 3 codons; deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: zinc finger protein 687
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 33 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 72 homolog
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 11-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
CD48 antigen-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
CD48 antigen-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
signaling lymphocytic activation molecule-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha, muscle-specific form-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC119711682 isoform X3
nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha, muscle-specific form-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha, muscle-specific form-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha, muscle-specific form-like isoform X1
nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha, muscle-specific form-like isoform X2
VANGL planar cell polarity protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
VANGL planar cell polarity protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
COPI coat complex subunit alpha, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
COPI coat complex subunit alpha, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
COPI coat complex subunit alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DBF4-type zinc finger-containing protein 2 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 46% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins
feather keratin B-4-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
feather keratin B-4-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 113 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 114 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 110 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 112 Proteins, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 113 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins
claw keratin-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins
claw keratin-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 Proteins
claw keratin-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins
claw keratin-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 Proteins, and 46% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 Proteins, and 59% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 47% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 27% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
late cornified envelope-like proline-rich protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 40% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein S100-A9-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein S100-A9-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
S100 calcium binding protein A14, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
S100 calcium binding protein A14, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein S100-A1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 1 EST, 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein S100-A1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 1 EST, 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: chromatin target of PRMT1 protein
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin enhancer binding factor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin enhancer binding factor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin enhancer-binding factor 2 isoform X2
interleukin enhancer-binding factor 2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA methionine (anticodon CAU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
translocon-associated protein subunit beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
translocon-associated protein subunit beta, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
translocon-associated protein subunit beta, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
translocon-associated protein subunit beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
translocon-associated protein subunit beta
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 45-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 45-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 45-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 45-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 45-like isoform X1
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 45-like isoform X2
Fc receptor-like protein 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor-like protein 2, transcript variant X9
Fc receptor-like protein 2, transcript variant X11
Fc receptor-like protein 2, transcript variant X12
Fc receptor-like protein 2, transcript variant X8
Fc receptor-like protein 2, transcript variant X2
Fc receptor-like protein 2, transcript variant X10
Fc receptor-like protein 2, transcript variant X1
Fc receptor-like protein 2, transcript variant X6
Fc receptor-like protein 2, transcript variant X5
Fc receptor-like protein 2, transcript variant X7
Fc receptor-like protein 2, transcript variant X3
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X2
Fc receptor-like protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III-like, transcript variant X3
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III-like, transcript variant X4
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III-like, transcript variant X1
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III-like isoform X3
uncharacterized protein LOC119711495 isoform X1
Fc receptor-like protein 5, transcript variant X8
Fc receptor-like protein 5, transcript variant X10
Fc receptor-like protein 5, transcript variant X5
Fc receptor-like protein 5, transcript variant X6
Fc receptor-like protein 5, transcript variant X2
Fc receptor-like protein 5, transcript variant X4
Fc receptor-like protein 5, transcript variant X1
Fc receptor-like protein 5, transcript variant X3
Fc receptor-like protein 5, transcript variant X9
Fc receptor-like protein 5, transcript variant X12
Fc receptor-like protein 5, transcript variant X11
Fc receptor-like protein 5, transcript variant X7
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III-like isoform X8
high affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc receptor I-like isoform X2
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III-like isoform X10
high affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc receptor I-like isoform X4
Fc receptor-like A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Fc receptor-like A, transcript variant X9
Fc receptor-like A, transcript variant X7
Fc receptor-like A, transcript variant X5
Fc receptor-like A, transcript variant X1
Fc receptor-like A, transcript variant X10
Fc receptor-like A, transcript variant X2
Fc receptor-like A, transcript variant X8
Fc receptor-like A, transcript variant X6
Fc receptor-like A, transcript variant X4
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-like isoform X10
high affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc receptor I-like isoform X5
high affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc receptor I-like isoform X1
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III-like, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein LOC119711495 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119711494, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119711494, transcript variant X3
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-like, transcript variant X4
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-like, transcript variant X5
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-like, transcript variant X3
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-like, transcript variant X2
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-like, transcript variant X1
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-like isoform X3
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-like isoform X4
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-like isoform X2
low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC119711494, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized protein LOC119711494 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC119711494, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein LOC119711494 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
cilia- and flagella-associated protein 45-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 7B
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 6-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 6-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 6-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 6-like isoform X2
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 6-like isoform X1
flavin adenine dinucleotide synthetase 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDC28 protein kinase regulatory subunit 1B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDC28 protein kinase regulatory subunit 1B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
cyclin-dependent kinases regulatory subunit 1 isoform X2
cyclin-dependent kinases regulatory subunit 1 isoform X1
SHC adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
SHC adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
SHC adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X7
SHC adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
SHC adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
SHC adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
SHC adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X2
SHC adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
SHC adaptor protein 1, transcript variant X9
pygopus family PHD finger 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
pygopus family PHD finger 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
PBX homeobox interacting protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
PBX homeobox interacting protein 1, transcript variant X1
pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor-interacting protein 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily N member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
small conductance calcium-activated potassium channel protein 3 isoform X1
potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily N member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
small conductance calcium-activated potassium channel protein 3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
double-stranded RNA-specific adenosine deaminase
cholinergic receptor nicotinic beta 2 subunit
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 60 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit beta-2
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 Q1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 Q1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 47 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 Q1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 Q1 isoform X1
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 Q1 isoform X3
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 Q1 isoform X2
Src homology 2 domain containing E, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Src homology 2 domain containing E, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain-containing adapter protein E isoform X2
SH2 domain-containing adapter protein E isoform X1
interleukin 6 receptor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 6 receptor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin 6 receptor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin-6 receptor subunit alpha isoform X2
interleukin-6 receptor subunit alpha isoform X1
interleukin-6 receptor subunit alpha isoform X3
ATPase phospholipid transporting 8B2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase phospholipid transporting 8B2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase phospholipid transporting 8B2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase phospholipid transporting 8B2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipid-transporting ATPase ID isoform X2
phospholipid-transporting ATPase ID isoform X1
phospholipid-transporting ATPase ID isoform X4
phospholipid-transporting ATPase ID isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin associated protein 2 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X8
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X7
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X6
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X3
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X9
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X2
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X5
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X4
ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 18 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 31 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 45 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
SMG5 nonsense mediated mRNA decay factor
bone gamma-carboxyglutamate protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
bone gamma-carboxyglutamate protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 81 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
late endosomal/lysosomal adaptor, MAPK and MTOR activator 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
IQ motif containing GTPase activating protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ras GTPase-activating-like protein IQGAP3 isoform X2
IQ motif containing GTPase activating protein 3, transcript variant X1
ras GTPase-activating-like protein IQGAP3 isoform X1
IQ motif containing GTPase activating protein 3, transcript variant X3
ras GTPase-activating-like protein IQGAP3 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Rh family B glycoprotein, transcript variant X1
Rh family B glycoprotein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ammonium transporter Rh type B isoform X1
ammonium transporter Rh type B isoform X2
hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 35 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
cellular retinoic acid binding protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 2
interferon stimulated exonuclease gene 20 like 2
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: interferon-stimulated 20 kDa exonuclease-like 2
ribosomal RNA adenine dimethylase domain containing 1
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
39S ribosomal protein L24, mitochondrial
heparin binding growth factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
heparin binding growth factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
hepatoma-derived growth factor isoform X2
hepatoma-derived growth factor isoform X1
proline rich mitotic checkpoint control factor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain containing 2A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain containing 2A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH2 domain-containing protein 2A isoform X2
SH2 domain-containing protein 2A isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase subunit 3, regulatory
dolichol-phosphate mannosyltransferase subunit 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 15 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 189 member B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 189 member B, transcript variant X4
family with sequence similarity 189 member B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 189 member B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
secretory carrier-associated membrane protein 3
uncharacterized LOC119711516, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC119711516, transcript variant X1
CDC like kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDC like kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDC like kinase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity protein kinase CLK2 isoform X2
dual specificity protein kinase CLK2 isoform X1
dual specificity protein kinase CLK2 isoform X3
hyperpolarization activated cyclic nucleotide gated potassium channel 3
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: potassium/sodium hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 2 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: RUN and SH3 domain-containing protein 1
ASH1 like histone lysine methyltransferase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH1 like histone lysine methyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ASH1 like histone lysine methyltransferase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase ASH1L isoform X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase ASH1L isoform X1
ASH1 like histone lysine methyltransferase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase ASH1L isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
28S ribosomal protein S29, mitochondrial
misato mitochondrial distribution and morphology regulator 1
GON-4-like protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
GON-4-like protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
GON-4-like protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
GON-4-like protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
GON-4-like protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 69 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
KH domain containing 4, pre-mRNA splicing factor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
KH domain containing 4, pre-mRNA splicing factor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
KH domain containing 4, pre-mRNA splicing factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
KH domain containing 4, pre-mRNA splicing factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
KH homology domain-containing protein 4 isoform X4
KH homology domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
KH homology domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
KH homology domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
KH domain containing 4, pre-mRNA splicing factor, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
KH domain containing 4, pre-mRNA splicing factor, transcript variant X8
KH domain containing 4, pre-mRNA splicing factor, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
KH domain containing 4, pre-mRNA splicing factor, transcript variant X7
KH homology domain-containing protein 4 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00423
HORMA domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
HORMA domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
HORMA domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
HORMA domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
HORMA domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
HORMA domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
HORMA domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
HORMA domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
HORMA domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
HORMA domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
HORMA domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
HORMA domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
golgi phosphoprotein 3 like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
golgi phosphoprotein 3 like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
MCL1 apoptosis regulator, BCL2 family member
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
induced myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein Mcl-1
transfer RNA arginine (anticodon UCU); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell adhesion molecule 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
mucosal pentraxin-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
mucosal pentraxin-like, transcript variant X2
mucosal pentraxin-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X motif 17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDC42 small effector 1, transcript variant X2
CDC42 small effector 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
MINDY lysine 48 deubiquitinase 1, transcript variant X3
MINDY lysine 48 deubiquitinase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
MINDY lysine 48 deubiquitinase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase MINDY-1
ceramide synthase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
ceramide synthase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB1 isoform X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB1 isoform X4
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB1 isoform X3
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB1 isoform X1
SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 1, transcript variant X5
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB1 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X1
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X6
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X4
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X8
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, transcript variant X9
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X1
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X3
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X2
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X5
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X6
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X7
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X4
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X8
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoform X9
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 33 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
threonyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
threonine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial isoform X1
threonyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
threonine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial isoform X2
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
U4/U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Prp3
acidic nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family member E, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
acidic nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family member E, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
acidic leucine-rich nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family member E isoform X2
acidic leucine-rich nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family member E isoform X1
pleckstrin homology domain containing O1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing O1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain containing O1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family O member 1 isoform X2
pleckstrin homology domain-containing family O member 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 45
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
thioredoxin interacting protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
thioredoxin interacting protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
thioredoxin-interacting protein isoform X2
thioredoxin-interacting protein isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
LIX1-like protein, transcript variant X2
LIX1-like protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 34A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 115, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 115, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF115 isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF115 isoform X1
ring finger protein 115, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF115 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DNA-directed RNA polymerase III subunit RPC3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CUGBP Elav-like family member 3, transcript variant X2
CUGBP Elav-like family member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
death effector domain-containing protein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
deaminated glutathione amidase isoform X2
deaminated glutathione amidase isoform X1
deaminated glutathione amidase isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit A-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 31 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 19, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 19 isoform X1
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 19, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 19 isoform X2
cilia and flagella associated protein 126
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit C
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
succinate dehydrogenase cytochrome b560 subunit, mitochondrial
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3 isoform X1
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3 isoform X2
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 3 isoform X3
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 40 like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM40B