Rattus norvegicus strain BN/NHsdMcwi chromosome Y, mRatBN7.2, whole genome shotgun sequence.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Euarchontoglires; Glires; Rodentia; Myomorpha; Muroidea; Muridae; Murinae; Rattus.
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM026995.1.\nAssembly name: mRatBN7.1\nThe genomic sequence for this RefSeq record is from the\nwhole-genome assembly released by the Wellcome Sanger Institute on\n2020/11/10. The original whole-genome shotgun project has the\naccession JACYVU000000000.1.\n\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-START##\nAssembly Provider :: Wellcome Sanger Institute\nAssembly Date :: 20-MAY-2020\nAssembly Method :: FALCON-Unzip v. 2020\nAssembly Name :: mRatBN7.1\nDiploid :: Principal pseudohaplotype\nGenome Representation :: Full\nExpected Final Version :: Yes\nGenome Coverage :: 92.0x\nSequencing Technology :: PacBio Sequel; 10X Genomics Chromium;\n BioNano; Arima Hi-C\n##Genome-Assembly-Data-END##\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Name :: Rattus norvegicus Annotation Release\n 108\nAnnotation Version :: 108\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 8.5\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
USA: Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Medical College of Wisconsin
transmembrane protein 106B pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosome biogenesis regulatory protein homolog; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 110 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: cmsearch.
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00026
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins
RNA binding motif protein, Y-linked, family 1, member J
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA-binding motif protein, Y chromosome, family 1 member B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 54 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 1 Y
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
lysine demethylase 5D, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine demethylase 5D, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine demethylase 5D, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 5D isoform X1
lysine-specific demethylase 5D isoform X2
lysine-specific demethylase 5D isoform X5
lysine demethylase 5D, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 5D isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
lysine demethylase 5D, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
lysine-specific demethylase 5D isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2, subunit 3, structural gene Y-linked; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2, subunit 3, structural gene Y-linked, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2, subunit 3, structural gene Y-linked
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 3, Y-linked
N-acetylalanine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:P41091; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (C9WPN6.2); acetylation site
Phosphoserine. /evidence=ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q9Z0N1; propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (C9WPN6.2); phosphorylation site
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (C9WPN6.2); Region: G1. /evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU01059
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (C9WPN6.2); Region: G2. /evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU01059
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (C9WPN6.2); Region: G3. /evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU01059
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (C9WPN6.2); Region: G4. /evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU01059
propagated from UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (C9WPN6.2); Region: G5. /evidence=ECO:0000255|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU01059
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 3, Y-linked isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC108353316, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC108353316, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC108353316, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC108353316, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC108353316, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC108353316, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X5
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X4
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linked, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 3
ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX3Y isoform X2
ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX3Y isoform X1
ubiquitin specific peptidase 9, Y-linked; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 9, Y-linked
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001329902.1
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 9, Y-linked, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 9, Y-linked, transcript variant X2
ubiquitin specific peptidase 9, Y-linked isoform X2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001316831.1
The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 9, Y-linked isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
igE-binding protein-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 Proteins
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00015
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 47% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
60S ribosome subunit biogenesis protein NIP7 homolog pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 G1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
vomeronasal type-2 receptor 116-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutaredoxin-1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
glutaredoxin-1-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: deleted 1 base in 1 codon; substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: glutaredoxin-1-like
COORDINATES: nucleotide motif:Rfam:12.0:RF00004
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC120099602, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC120099602, transcript variant X2
olfactory receptor pseudogene 1761; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC120099581, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC120099581, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC120099581, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC103694765, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC103694765, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read
uncharacterized LOC108353413, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC108353413, transcript variant X1
cofilin-1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
polyglutamine-binding protein 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC103694782, transcript variant X6
uncharacterized LOC103694782, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC103694782, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC103694782, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC103694782, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC103694782, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC103694790, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC103694790, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC103694790, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC103694790, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC103694790, transcript variant X5
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred CDS: inserted 2 bases in 1 codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: igE-binding protein-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
endogenous retrovirus group K member 21 Env polyprotein-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
endogenous retrovirus group K member 21 Env polyprotein-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
endogenous retrovirus group K member 19 Env polyprotein-like isoform X2
endogenous retrovirus group K member 21 Env polyprotein-like isoform X1
60S ribosomal protein L35a pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins
hepatitis A virus cellular receptor 2 homolog pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.