Homo sapiens chromosome 21, GRCh37.p13 Primary Assembly.
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Euarchontoglires; Primates; Haplorrhini; Catarrhini; Hominidae; Homo.
Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
REFSEQ INFORMATION: The reference sequence is identical to\nCM000683.1.\n[WARNING] On Feb 3, 2014 this sequence was replaced by\ngi:568815577.\nOn Jun 10, 2009 this sequence version replaced gi:51511750.\nAssembly Name: GRCh37.p13 Primary Assembly\nThe DNA sequence is composed of genomic sequence, primarily\nfinished clones that were sequenced as part of the Human Genome\nProject. PCR products and WGS shotgun sequence have been added\nwhere necessary to fill gaps or correct errors. All such additions\nare manually curated by GRC staff. For more information see:\nhttp://genomereference.org.\n\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-START##\nAnnotation Provider :: NCBI\nAnnotation Status :: Full annotation\nAnnotation Version :: Homo sapiens Annotation Release 105\nAnnotation Pipeline :: NCBI eukaryotic genome annotation\n pipeline\nAnnotation Software Version :: 5.1\nAnnotation Method :: Best-placed RefSeq; Gnomon\nFeatures Annotated :: Gene; mRNA; CDS; ncRNA\n##Genome-Annotation-Data-END##
chromosome 2 open reading frame 27A pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin heavy variable 1/OR21-1 (non-functional); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; ornithine transporter) member 15 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
transmembrane phosphatase with tensin homology; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane phosphatase with tensin homology, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_199260.2
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane phosphatase with tensin homology, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_199259.2
transmembrane phosphatase with tensin homology, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_199261.2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_954869.1
isoform gamma is encoded by transcript variant 3; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
putative tyrosine-protein phosphatase TPTE isoform gamma
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_954868.1
isoform beta is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
putative tyrosine-protein phosphatase TPTE isoform beta
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_954870.2
isoform alpha is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
putative tyrosine-protein phosphatase TPTE isoform alpha
cytochrome c, somatic pseudogene 41; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2C-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
B melanoma antigen family, member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
vomeronasal 1 receptor 7 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit F pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ankyrin repeat domain 30B pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
vomeronasal 1 receptor 109 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 355, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 24% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
fibroblast growth factor 7 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ankyrin repeat domain 30B pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 3156-3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
general transcription factor IIi, pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
vomeronasal 1 receptor 8 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
sorting nexin 19 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor, family 4, subfamily K, member 11 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor, family 4, subfamily K, member 12 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
A26B3; ANKRD21; CT104.1; POTE; POTE-21; POTE21
POTE ankyrin domain family, member D; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
POTE ankyrin domain family, member D, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
POTE ankyrin domain family member D isoform X1
microRNA 3118-5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
GRAM domain containing 4 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
fem-1 homolog a (C. elegans) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
telomeric repeat binding factor (NIMA-interacting) 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
family with sequence similarity 207, member C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
brain cytoplasmic RNA 1 (non-protein coding) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
glucoside xylosyltransferase 1 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
calponin 2 pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 114 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily F, polypeptide 29, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
sorting nexin 18 pseudogene 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ras homolog family member T1 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ankyrin repeat domain 20 family, member A11, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ankyrin repeat domain 20 family, member A11, pseudogene
neurofibromin 1 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ankyrin repeat domain 20 family, member A18, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 488; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
endoplasmic reticulum lectin 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
lipase, member I; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA binding motif protein 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 11, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 13, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 13, pseudogene, transcript variant A
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 13, pseudogene, transcript variant D
heat shock protein 70kDa family, member 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
heat shock protein 70kDa family, member 13
heat shock protein 70kDa family, member 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 33 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SAM domain, SH3 domain and nuclear localization signals 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
SAM domain, SH3 domain and nuclear localization signals 1, transcript variant 2
SAM domain, SH3 domain and nuclear localization signals 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SAM domain, SH3 domain and nuclear localization signals 1, transcript variant 1
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SAM domain-containing protein SAMSN-1 isoform 2
SAM domain-containing protein SAMSN-1 isoform X1
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SAM domain-containing protein SAMSN-1 isoform 1
SAMSN1 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized protein ENSP00000383407-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized protein ENSP00000383407-like
putative uncharacterized protein ENSP00000383407
polymerase (RNA) II (DNA directed) polypeptide C, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase pseudogene 16; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA binding motif protein, X-linked 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
nuclear receptor interacting protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
nuclear receptor interacting protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 65 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nuclear receptor interacting protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 64 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nuclear receptor interacting protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 63 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor interacting protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 63 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor interacting protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 63 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear receptor-interacting protein 1 isoform X1
nuclear receptor-interacting protein 1 isoform X2
nuclear receptor-interacting protein 1 isoform X3
nuclear receptor-interacting protein 1 isoform X4
nuclear receptor-interacting protein 1 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytochrome c, somatic pseudogene 42; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RAD23 homolog B-like (S. cerevisiae) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 65 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 63 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X2
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X3
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25
RNA binding protein with multiple splicing-like pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 25, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 44 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 25 isoform X4
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 478; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 478, transcript variant 1
voltage-dependent anion channel 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S26 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 478, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 478, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 478, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 478, transcript variant 2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 478, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 478, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 478, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 478, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
microRNA 99a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA let-7c; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 125b-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NIMA-related kinase 4 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 37; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 37, transcript variant 1
chromosome 21 open reading frame 37, transcript variant 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
transfer RNA glycine 27 (anticodon GCC); tRNA features were annotated by tRNAscan-SE; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
ribosomal protein L39 pseudogene 40; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor, transcript variant 5
coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor, transcript variant 1
coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor, transcript variant 2
coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor, transcript variant 3
coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor, transcript variant 4
coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 51 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
isoform 5 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor isoform 5 precursor
isoform 1 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor isoform 1 precursor
coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor isoform X1
isoform 2 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor isoform 2 precursor
isoform 3 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor isoform 3 precursor
isoform 4 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor isoform 4 precursor
basic transcription factor 3-like 4 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
BTG family, member 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BTG family, member 3, transcript variant 2
BTG family, member 3, transcript variant 1
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
C21orf91 overlapping transcript 1 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
C21orf91 overlapping transcript 1 (non-protein coding), transcript variant 2
C21orf91 overlapping transcript 1 (non-protein coding), transcript variant 1
chromosome 21 open reading frame 91; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 91, transcript variant 3
chromosome 21 open reading frame 91, transcript variant 2
chromosome 21 open reading frame 91, transcript variant 1
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CHODL antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L37 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chondrolectin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001204176.1
The RefSeq transcript aligns at 97% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001204178.1
isoform a precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001204175.1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001204177.1
The RefSeq transcript aligns at 96% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protease, serine 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_002772.2
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_002763.2
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST
microRNA 548x; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
peptidylprolyl isomerase A (cyclophilin A) pseudogene 22; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 6, member 6 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L37 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
non imprinted in Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome 2 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SREK1-interacting protein 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
complement component 1, q subcomponent binding protein, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
farnesyl diphosphate synthase pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin 18 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S3A pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 320; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 320, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 320
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 320, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 320, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
peptidylprolyl isomerase A (cyclophilin A), pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
neural cell adhesion molecule 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
neural cell adhesion molecule 2 precursor
neural cell adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 43 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
neural cell adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
neural cell adhesion molecule 2 isoform X1
neural cell adhesion molecule 2 isoform X3
neural cell adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 37 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural cell adhesion molecule 2 isoform X2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 317; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 317
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 19% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 308; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 308
phosphoglycerate kinase 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
mitogen-activated protein kinase 6 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 299, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Myb/SANT-like DNA-binding domain containing 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
D21S2088E; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
tubulin, alpha pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
vomeronasal 2 receptor 20 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC339622; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CTAGE family, member 5 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 489; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L13a pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 158; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 158
MIR155 host gene (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 155; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 515; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 515
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_024092.1
C21orf92; L39mt; MRP-L5; MRPL5; MSTP003; PRED22; PRED66; RPML5
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L39; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L39, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_017446.3
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L39, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_080794.3
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_059142.2
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
39S ribosomal protein L39, mitochondrial isoform a
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_542984.2
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
39S ribosomal protein L39, mitochondrial isoform b
C21orf43; CD322; JAM-B; JAMB; PRO245; VE-JAM; VEJAM
junctional adhesion molecule 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
junctional adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant 1
junctional adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant 4
junctional adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant 2
junctional adhesion molecule 2, transcript variant 3
junctional adhesion molecule B isoform 1 precursor
junctional adhesion molecule B isoform 2 precursor
junctional adhesion molecule B isoform 3 precursor
RNA guanylyltransferase and 5'-phosphatase pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ferredoxin 1 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit F6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit F6, transcript variant 4
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit F6, transcript variant 3
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit F6, transcript variant 2
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit F6, transcript variant 5
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit F6, transcript variant 1
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit F6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 24 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform b precursor is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP synthase-coupling factor 6, mitochondrial isoform b precursor
isoform a precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP synthase-coupling factor 6, mitochondrial isoform a precursor
isoform a precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform a precursor is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP synthase-coupling factor 6, mitochondrial isoform X1
E4TF1-60; E4TF1A; NFT2; NRF2; NRF2A; RCH04A07
GA binding protein transcription factor, alpha subunit 60kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
GA binding protein transcription factor, alpha subunit 60kDa, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001197297.1
GA binding protein transcription factor, alpha subunit 60kDa, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_002040.3
GA binding protein transcription factor, alpha subunit 60kDa, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 34 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
GA binding protein transcription factor, alpha subunit 60kDa, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
GA binding protein transcription factor, alpha subunit 60kDa, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
GA-binding protein alpha chain isoform X1
GA-binding protein alpha chain isoform X2
GA-binding protein alpha chain isoform X3
AAA; ABETA; ABPP; AD1; APPI; CTFgamma; CVAP; PN-II; PN2
amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein, transcript variant 7
amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein, transcript variant 5
amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein, transcript variant 6
amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein, transcript variant 10
amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein, transcript variant 3
amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein, transcript variant 9
amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein, transcript variant 2
amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein, transcript variant 8
amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein, transcript variant 1
amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein, transcript variant 4
isoform e precursor is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
amyloid beta A4 protein isoform e precursor
isoform f precursor is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
amyloid beta A4 protein isoform f precursor
isoform j precursor is encoded by transcript variant 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
amyloid beta A4 protein isoform j precursor
isoform c precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
amyloid beta A4 protein isoform c precursor
isoform i precursor is encoded by transcript variant 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
amyloid beta A4 protein isoform i precursor
isoform b precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
amyloid beta A4 protein isoform b precursor
isoform h precursor is encoded by transcript variant 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
amyloid beta A4 protein isoform h precursor
amyloid beta A4 protein isoform a precursor
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform g is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
myristoylated alanine-rich protein kinase C substrate pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
tigger transposable element-derived protein 1-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tigger transposable element-derived protein 1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 9% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cysteine/tyrosine-rich 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cysteine/tyrosine-rich 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteine and tyrosine-rich protein 1 precursor
cysteine/tyrosine-rich 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cysteine and tyrosine-rich protein 1 isoform X1
cysteine/tyrosine-rich 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 47% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cysteine and tyrosine-rich protein 1 isoform X2
tigger transposable element-derived protein 1 isoform X1
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_006988.3
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 1 preproprotein
ADAM-TS 11; ADAM-TS 5; ADAM-TS5; ADAMTS-11; ADAMTS-5; ADAMTS11; ADMP-2
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 5
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 5 preproprotein
microRNA 4759; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glutathione peroxidase pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L10 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
nicastrin pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 113; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 113
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 314; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 314
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 31% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 161; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 161
N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 1 (putative); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 1 (putative), transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_047510.1
N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 1 (putative), transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_182749.3
N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 1 (putative), transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_013240.4
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_877426.3
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
hemK methyltransferase family member 2 isoform 2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_037372.3
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
hemK methyltransferase family member 2 isoform 1
heat shock 60kDa protein 1 (chaperonin) pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
THUMP domain containing 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
listerin E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L23 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RWD domain containing 2B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 16; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 16, transcript variant 3
ubiquitin specific peptidase 16, transcript variant 1
ubiquitin specific peptidase 16, transcript variant 2
ubiquitin specific peptidase 16, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 57 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 16 isoform X1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 16 isoform a
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 16 isoform b
ubiquitin specific peptidase 16, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 37 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 16 isoform X2
chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 8 (theta); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 8 (theta)
chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 8 (theta), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 120 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 8 (theta), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 104 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 8 (theta), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 115 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
T-complex protein 1 subunit theta isoform X1
T-complex protein 1 subunit theta isoform X3
T-complex protein 1 subunit theta isoform X2
C21orf7; HC21ORF7; TAK1L; TAKL; TAKL-1; TAKL-2; TAKL-4
MAP3K7 C-terminal like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
MAP3K7 C-terminal like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
MAP3K7 C-terminal like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_020152.2
ribosomal protein L12 pseudogene 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
MAP3K7 C-terminal like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 189; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 189
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase pseudogene 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
BTB and CNC homology 1, basic leucine zipper transcription factor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
BTB and CNC homology 1, basic leucine zipper transcription factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 52 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
BTB and CNC homology 1, basic leucine zipper transcription factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
BTB and CNC homology 1, basic leucine zipper transcription factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 53 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
BTB and CNC homology 1, basic leucine zipper transcription factor 1, transcript variant 2
BTB and CNC homology 1, basic leucine zipper transcription factor 1, transcript variant 1
BTB and CNC homology 1, basic leucine zipper transcription factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 51 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
BTB and CNC homology 1, basic leucine zipper transcription factor 1, transcript variant 3
transcription regulator protein BACH1 isoform X1
transcription regulator protein BACH1 isoform X2
transcription regulator protein BACH1 isoform X3
glutamate receptor, ionotropic, kainate 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
glutamate receptor, ionotropic, kainate 1, transcript variant 2
glutamate receptor, ionotropic, kainate 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamate receptor, ionotropic, kainate 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glutamate receptor, ionotropic, kainate 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform X4
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform 2 precursor
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform X1
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform X2
glutamate receptor, ionotropic, kainate 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glutamate receptor, ionotropic, kainate 1, transcript variant 1
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform X3
glutamate receptor ionotropic, kainate 1 isoform 1 precursor
GRIK1 antisense RNA 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
GRIK1 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
claudin 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 307; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 307
claudin 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L8 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin associated protein 24-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 25-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 26-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 27-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 23-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 13-6, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin associated protein 13-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 4327; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 13-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 13-3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 13-4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 13-5, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin associated protein 15-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 19-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 19-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 19-3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 19-4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 19-5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 19-9, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin associated protein 19-10, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin associated protein 19-11, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin associated protein 19-6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_181612.2
keratin associated protein 19-7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 22-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 6-3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 6-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 22-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 6-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 20-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 20-4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 20-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 20-3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 21-3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 21-4, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin associated protein 21-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 21-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 8-2, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin associated protein 8-3, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin associated protein 8-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 7-1 (gene/pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 7-1 (gene/pseudogene)
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_181606.2
The RefSeq transcript has 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_853637.2
The RefSeq protein has 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 11-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 19-8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin protein ligase E3A pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
T-cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
T-cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1
T-cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 51 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 44 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 42 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis-inducing protein 1
T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis-inducing protein 1 isoform X1
T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis-inducing protein 1 isoform X2
T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis-inducing protein 1 isoform X3
T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis-inducing protein 1 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 9% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 6 open reading frame 203 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 11 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
superoxide dismutase 1, soluble; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SR-related CTD-associated factor 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
SR-related CTD-associated factor 4, transcript variant 2
SR-related CTD-associated factor 4, transcript variant 3
SR-related CTD-associated factor 4, transcript variant 1
SR-related CTD-associated factor 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 58 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
SR-related CTD-associated factor 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 55 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SR-related CTD-associated factor 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 52 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 15 isoform 2
splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 15 isoform X3
splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 15 isoform 3
splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 15 isoform 1
splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 15 isoform X1
splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 15 isoform X2
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
tumor protein, translationally-controlled 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
hormonally up-regulated Neu-associated kinase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
hormonally up-regulated Neu-associated kinase
hormonally up-regulated neu tumor-associated kinase
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 159; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 159
B28; C21orf45; C21orf46; FASP1; hMis18alpha; MIS18alpha
MIS18 kinetochore protein homolog A (S. pombe); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
MIS18 kinetochore protein homolog A (S. pombe)
melanocortin 2 receptor accessory protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
melanocortin 2 receptor accessory protein, transcript variant 2
melanocortin 2 receptor accessory protein, transcript variant 1
isoform beta is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
melanocortin-2 receptor accessory protein isoform beta
isoform alpha is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
melanocortin-2 receptor accessory protein isoform alpha
URB1 ribosome biogenesis 1 homolog (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
URB1 ribosome biogenesis 1 homolog (S. cerevisiae)
nucleolar pre-ribosomal-associated protein 1
small nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 80; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 119; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
eva-1 homolog C (C. elegans); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
eva-1 homolog C (C. elegans), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
eva-1 homolog C (C. elegans), transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
eva-1 homolog C (C. elegans), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
eva-1 homolog C (C. elegans), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
eva-1 homolog C (C. elegans), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
eva-1 homolog C (C. elegans), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
exosome component 3 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 490; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
t-complex 10-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 59; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 59, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 38 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 21 open reading frame 59, transcript variant 1
chromosome 21 open reading frame 59, transcript variant 2
uncharacterized protein C21orf59 isoform X1
chromosome 21 open reading frame 59, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C21orf59 isoform X2
olfactory receptor, family 7, subfamily E, member 23 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
synaptojanin 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 50 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 52 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 47 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 45 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 41 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 30 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAXBP1 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PAXBP1 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
PAXBP1 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
PAX3 and PAX7 binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PAX3 and PAX7 binding protein 1, transcript variant 1
PAX3 and PAX7 binding protein 1, transcript variant 3
PAX3- and PAX7-binding protein 1 isoform 1
PAX3 and PAX7 binding protein 1, transcript variant 2
PAX3- and PAX7-binding protein 1 isoform 2
chromosome 21 open reading frame 49; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 49, transcript variant 1
chromosome 21 open reading frame 49, transcript variant 2
chromosome 21 open reading frame 62; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 62, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001162496.2
chromosome 21 open reading frame 62, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_019596.5
chromosome 21 open reading frame 62, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001162495.2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001155967.2
uncharacterized protein C21orf62 precursor
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001155968.2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_062542.5
BHLHB1; bHLHe19; OLIGO2; PRKCBP2; RACK17
oligodendrocyte lineage transcription factor 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
oligodendrocyte lineage transcription factor 2
oligodendrocyte lineage transcription factor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 isoform X1
oligodendrocyte transcription factor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
oligodendrocyte transcription factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
oligodendrocyte transcription factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 21 open reading frame 54; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 2, transcript variant 1
interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 2, transcript variant 2
interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 2, transcript variant 3
interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 18 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon alpha/beta receptor 2 isoform a precursor
interferon alpha/beta receptor 2 isoform X4
interferon alpha/beta receptor 2 isoform b precursor
isoform b precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
interferon alpha/beta receptor 2 isoform X2
interferon alpha/beta receptor 2 isoform X3
interferon alpha/beta receptor 2 isoform X1
IL10RB antisense RNA 1 (head to head); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
interleukin 10 receptor, beta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
interleukin 10 receptor, beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin-10 receptor subunit beta precursor
interleukin 10 receptor, beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
interleukin-10 receptor subunit beta isoform X1
interleukin-10 receptor subunit beta isoform X2
interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 63 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 1
interferon alpha/beta receptor 1 precursor
upstream transcription factor 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
interferon alpha/beta receptor 1 isoform X1
interferon gamma receptor 2 (interferon gamma transducer 1); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
interferon gamma receptor 2 (interferon gamma transducer 1)
interferon gamma receptor 2 (interferon gamma transducer 1), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 55 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transmembrane protein 50B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protein 50B, transcript variant 2
transmembrane protein 50B, transcript variant 1
ribosomal protein S5 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 28; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 28, transcript variant 2
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 28, transcript variant 1
phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase, phosphoribosylglycinamide synthetase, phosphoribosylaminoimidazole synthetase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase, phosphoribosylglycinamide synthetase, phosphoribosylaminoimidazole synthetase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 114 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase, phosphoribosylglycinamide synthetase, phosphoribosylaminoimidazole synthetase, transcript variant 4
phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase, phosphoribosylglycinamide synthetase, phosphoribosylaminoimidazole synthetase, transcript variant 3
phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase, phosphoribosylglycinamide synthetase, phosphoribosylaminoimidazole synthetase, transcript variant 1
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
trifunctional purine biosynthetic protein adenosine-3 isoform 1
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
trifunctional purine biosynthetic protein adenosine-3 isoform X1
basic transcription factor 3 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase, phosphoribosylglycinamide synthetase, phosphoribosylaminoimidazole synthetase, transcript variant 2
trifunctional purine biosynthetic protein adenosine-3 isoform 2
SON DNA binding protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SON DNA binding protein, transcript variant e
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_103798.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SON DNA binding protein, transcript variant c
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_103797.1
SON DNA binding protein, transcript variant f
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_138927.2
SON DNA binding protein, transcript variant h
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_103796.1
SON DNA binding protein, transcript variant b
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_032195.2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_620305.2
isoform F is encoded by transcript variant f; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_115571.2
isoform B is encoded by transcript variant b; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
downstream neighbor of SON; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
downstream neighbor of SON, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
downstream neighbor of SON, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
downstream neighbor of SON, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
downstream neighbor of SON, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
downstream neighbor of SON, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 34 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein downstream neighbor of Son isoform X3
protein downstream neighbor of Son isoform X1
protein downstream neighbor of Son isoform X2
crystallin, zeta (quinone reductase)-like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
crystallin, zeta (quinone reductase)-like 1
crystallin, zeta (quinone reductase)-like 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 51 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin, zeta (quinone reductase)-like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
crystallin, zeta (quinone reductase)-like 1 isoform X1
crystallin, zeta (quinone reductase)-like 1 isoform X3
crystallin, zeta (quinone reductase)-like 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
crystallin, zeta (quinone reductase)-like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
crystallin, zeta (quinone reductase)-like 1 isoform X2
intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 mRNAs, 71 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 mRNAs, 77 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 mRNAs, 92 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein), transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 mRNAs, 78 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein), transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 mRNAs, 85 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 74 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 82 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein), transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 75 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein), transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 66 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein), transcript variant 1
intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein), transcript variant 2
isoform ITSN-l is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform ITSN-s is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, O subunit; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, O subunit
ATP synthase subunit O, mitochondrial precursor
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 649; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 649
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 5 (sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter), member 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 5 (sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter), member 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 5 (sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter), member 3
solute carrier family 5 (sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter), member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 5 (sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter), member 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 27 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter isoform X1
sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter isoform X2
sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter isoform X3
ribosomal protein S5 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 310; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 310, transcript variant 1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 310, transcript variant 2
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 2
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 2
small integral membrane protein 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein ENSP00000386791-like
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1 isoform X2
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1, transcript variant 2
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1, transcript variant 7
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1, transcript variant 5
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1, transcript variant 6
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1, transcript variant 8
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1, transcript variant 4
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1, transcript variant 3
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1, transcript variant 1
potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1 isoform X1
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1
regulator of calcineurin 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
regulator of calcineurin 1, transcript variant 1
regulator of calcineurin 1, transcript variant 2
regulator of calcineurin 1, transcript variant 3
regulator of calcineurin 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of calcineurin 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 17 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
chloride intracellular channel 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
chloride intracellular channel 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chloride intracellular channel protein 6 isoform X1
chloride intracellular channel protein 6
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 160; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 160
uncharacterized LOC100506385; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC100506385, transcript variant 1
uncharacterized LOC100506385, transcript variant 2
AML1; AML1-EVI-1; AMLCR1; CBFA2; EVI-1; PEBP2aB
runt-related transcription factor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
runt-related transcription factor 1, transcript variant 1
runt-related transcription factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 41 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
runt-related transcription factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 mRNAs, 45 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
runt-related transcription factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 44 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
runt-related transcription factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 44 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
runt-related transcription factor 1, transcript variant 2
runt-related transcription factor 1 isoform X3
isoform AML1c is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
runt-related transcription factor 1 isoform AML1c
runt-related transcription factor 1 isoform X1
runt-related transcription factor 1 isoform X2
isoform AML1b is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
runt-related transcription factor 1 isoform AML1b
runt-related transcription factor 1 isoform X4
runt-related transcription factor 1, transcript variant 3
isoform AML1a is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
runt-related transcription factor 1 isoform AML1a
putative uncharacterized protein FLJ22184-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
RUNX1 intronic transcript 1 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RUNX1 intronic transcript 1 (non-protein coding)
uncharacterized LOC100506403; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L34 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (Drosophila) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 802; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein S20 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 2 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
MT-ND2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ribosomal protein L23a pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SET domain containing 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 20 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant 1
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant 4
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant 3
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform X4
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform X5
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform 1
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform X6
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform X7
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant 2
SET domain containing 4, transcript variant 5
SET domain-containing protein 4 isoform 2
ribosomal modification protein rimK-like family member B pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC100133286; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
carbonyl reductase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
carbonyl reductase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
mediator of cell motility 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CBR3 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CBR3 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
CBR3 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
ribosomal protein S9 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
carbonyl reductase 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
carbonyl reductase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
CBR3 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 3
dopey family member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
dopey family member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_005128.2
ribosomal protein L3 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 9 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S26 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 37 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
MORC family CW-type zinc finger protein 3
MORC family CW-type zinc finger protein 3 isoform X1
MORC family CW-type zinc finger protein 3 isoform X2
CAF-1; CAF-IP60; CAF1; CAF1A; CAF1P60; MPHOSPH7; MPP7
chromatin assembly factor 1, subunit B (p60); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromatin assembly factor 1, subunit B (p60)
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit F2-like pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
claudin 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit, non-ATPase, 4 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
single-minded homolog 2 (Drosophila); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
single-minded homolog 2 (Drosophila), transcript variant SIM2
single-minded homolog 2 (Drosophila), transcript variant SIM2s
long isoform is encoded by transcript variant SIM2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
short isoform is encoded by transcript variant SIM2s; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
holocarboxylase synthetase (biotin-(proprionyl-CoA-carboxylase (ATP-hydrolysing)) ligase); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
holocarboxylase synthetase (biotin-(proprionyl-CoA-carboxylase (ATP-hydrolysing)) ligase), transcript variant 1
holocarboxylase synthetase (biotin-(proprionyl-CoA-carboxylase (ATP-hydrolysing)) ligase), transcript variant 2
holocarboxylase synthetase (biotin-(proprionyl-CoA-carboxylase (ATP-hydrolysing)) ligase), transcript variant 3
holocarboxylase synthetase (biotin-(proprionyl-CoA-carboxylase (ATP-hydrolysing)) ligase), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
holocarboxylase synthetase (biotin-(proprionyl-CoA-carboxylase (ATP-hydrolysing)) ligase), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
holocarboxylase synthetase (biotin-(proprionyl-CoA-carboxylase (ATP-hydrolysing)) ligase), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 57 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
holocarboxylase synthetase (biotin-(proprionyl-CoA-carboxylase (ATP-hydrolysing)) ligase), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 491; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
divergent-paired related homeobox pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L20 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ripply transcriptional repressor 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ripply transcriptional repressor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class P; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class P, transcript variant 2
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class P, transcript variant 4
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class P, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_153681.2
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class P, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 mRNAs, 20 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class P, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_710148.1
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase subunit P isoform 1
phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase subunit P isoform 2
phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase subunit P isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase subunit P isoform X2
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 183 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant 2
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 183 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 190 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X4
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 187 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 177 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 55 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 181 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 191 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 185 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 195 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X7
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X14
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 185 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant 1
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 181 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X4
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X5
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X6
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X8
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X9
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X10
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X11
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X12
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 138 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TTC3 isoform X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 47% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Down syndrome critical region gene 9 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Down syndrome critical region gene 9 (non-protein coding)
Down syndrome critical region gene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Down syndrome critical region gene 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 37 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Down syndrome critical region gene 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 38 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Down syndrome critical region gene 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 44 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_006052.1
Down syndrome critical region protein 3 isoform X3
Down syndrome critical region protein 3 isoform X2
Down syndrome critical region protein 3 isoform X1
dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant 3
dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant 2
dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant 5
dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 60 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 51 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant 1
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A isoform 1
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A isoform 2
isoform 5 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A isoform 5
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A isoform 3
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A isoform X2
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A isoform X1
dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 58 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 60 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A isoform X3
dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A isoform X4
BIR1; GIRK-2; GIRK2; hiGIRK2; KATP-2; KATP2; KCNJ7; KIR3.2
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 6
G protein-activated inward rectifier potassium channel 2
Down syndrome critical region gene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_005867.2
C21orf65; CT25.1a; CT25.1b; MMA-1; MMA-1a; MMA-1b; MMA1; MTAG2
Down syndrome critical region gene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Down syndrome critical region gene 8, transcript variant 4
Down syndrome critical region gene 8, transcript variant 3
Down syndrome critical region gene 8, transcript variant 5
Down syndrome critical region gene 8, transcript variant 1
Down syndrome critical region gene 8, transcript variant 2
cutaneous T-cell lymphoma-associated antigen 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Down syndrome critical region gene 10 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Down syndrome critical region gene 10 (non-protein coding)
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15, transcript variant 8
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15, transcript variant 6
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15, transcript variant 7
spermatogenesis associated 20 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15, transcript variant 5
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15, transcript variant 4
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15, transcript variant 2
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15, transcript variant 1
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15, transcript variant 3
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-sensitive inward rectifier potassium channel 15
ATP-sensitive inward rectifier potassium channel 15 isoform X1
ATP-sensitive inward rectifier potassium channel 15 isoform X2
ATP-sensitive inward rectifier potassium channel 15 isoform X3
v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog, transcript variant 7
isoform 6 is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog, transcript variant 2
v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog, transcript variant 3
v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog, transcript variant 5
v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog, transcript variant 6
v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog, transcript variant 4
v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog, transcript variant 1
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 5 is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 4 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide G pseudogene 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 114; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 114, transcript variant 3
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 114, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 114, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_027065.1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 114, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_027066.1
The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 2, transcript variant 2
v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 2, transcript variant 1
v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 65 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101928398, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101928398, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein SA pseudogene 64; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
proteasome (prosome, macropain) assembly chaperone 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
proteasome (prosome, macropain) assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
proteasome assembly chaperone 1 isoform X2
ribosomal protein L23a pseudogene 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
poly(rC) binding protein 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
proteasome (prosome, macropain) assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant 4
proteasome (prosome, macropain) assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant 2
proteasome (prosome, macropain) assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant 3
proteasome (prosome, macropain) assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant 1
proteasome (prosome, macropain) assembly chaperone 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 33 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
proteasome assembly chaperone 1 isoform b
proteasome assembly chaperone 1 isoform 3
proteasome assembly chaperone 1 isoform a
proteasome assembly chaperone 1 isoform X1
bromodomain and WD repeat domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
bromodomain and WD repeat domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 51 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain and WD repeat domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 98 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
bromodomain and WD repeat domain containing 1, transcript variant 1
bromodomain and WD repeat domain containing 1, transcript variant 2
bromodomain and WD repeat-containing protein 1 isoform X1
bromodomain and WD repeat-containing protein 1 isoform A
bromodomain and WD repeat-containing protein 1 isoform X2
bromodomain and WD repeat-containing protein 1 isoform B
translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 9 homolog (yeast) pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
methyltransferase like 21A pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
bromodomain and WD repeat domain containing 1, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001007246.2
bromodomain and WD repeat-containing protein 1 isoform C
BRWD1 intronic transcript 2 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BRWD1 intronic transcript 2 (non-protein coding)
BRWD1 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 28 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 28 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 28 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 31 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
non-histone chromosomal protein HMG-14 isoform X1
non-histone chromosomal protein HMG-14 isoform X2
non-histone chromosomal protein HMG-14 isoform X3
non-histone chromosomal protein HMG-14 isoform X4
non-histone chromosomal protein HMG-14 isoform X5
non-histone chromosomal protein HMG-14 isoform X6
ring finger protein (C3H2C3 type) 6 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
tryptophan rich basic protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
tryptophan rich basic protein, transcript variant 1
tail-anchored protein insertion receptor WRB isoform 1
tryptophan rich basic protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
tryptophan rich basic protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
tryptophan rich basic protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
tryptophan rich basic protein, transcript variant 2
tail-anchored protein insertion receptor WRB isoform 2
tail-anchored protein insertion receptor WRB isoform X1
tail-anchored protein insertion receptor WRB isoform X2
tail-anchored protein insertion receptor WRB isoform X3
Leber congenital amaurosis 5-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Leber congenital amaurosis 5-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Leber congenital amaurosis 5-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Leber congenital amaurosis 5-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Leber congenital amaurosis 5-like isoform X3
Leber congenital amaurosis 5-like isoform X1
Leber congenital amaurosis 5-like isoform X2
SH3 domain binding glutamic acid-rich protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
SH3 domain binding glutamic acid-rich protein, transcript variant 2
SH3 domain binding glutamic acid-rich protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain binding glutamic acid-rich protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain binding glutamic acid-rich protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
SH3 domain binding glutamic acid-rich protein, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_007341.2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_031367.1
SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich protein isoform a
SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich protein isoform X1
SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich protein isoform b
SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich protein isoform X2
SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich protein isoform X3
myosin, light chain 6 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S26 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
KIAA1462 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
3-GalTase 5; B3GalT-V; B3GalTx; B3T5; beta-1; beta-3-Gx-T5; beta3Gal-T5; GLCT5
UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,3-galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,3-galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 21 open reading frame 88; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 88, transcript variant 1
chromosome 21 open reading frame 88, transcript variant 2
UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,3-galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 5, transcript variant 6
UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,3-galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 5, transcript variant 3
UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,3-galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 5, transcript variant 4
UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,3-galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 5, transcript variant 1
UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,3-galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 5, transcript variant 2
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
beta-1,3-galactosyltransferase 5 isoform b
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
beta-1,3-galactosyltransferase 5 isoform a
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
beta-1,3-galactosyltransferase 5 isoform X1
immunoglobulin superfamily, member 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Purkinje cell protein 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule, transcript variant 3
Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule, transcript variant 2
Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule, transcript variant 1
Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule isoform 2 precursor
isoform CHD2-42 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule isoform CHD2-42 precursor
microRNA 4760; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DSCAM antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DSCAM antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
DSCAM antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
DSCAM antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 4
DSCAM antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 3
DSCAM intronic transcript 1 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DSCAM intronic transcript 1 (non-protein coding)
yrdC domain containing (E. coli) pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 323; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 323, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 323, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 323
microRNA 3197; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
AEPLC; ALP56; ASP1; ASP21; BAE2; CDA13; CEAP1; DRAP
beta-site APP-cleaving enzyme 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
beta-site APP-cleaving enzyme 2, transcript variant a
beta-site APP-cleaving enzyme 2, transcript variant b
beta-site APP-cleaving enzyme 2, transcript variant c
isoform A preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
beta-secretase 2 isoform A preproprotein
isoform C preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant c; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
beta-secretase 2 isoform C preproprotein
isoform B preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
beta-secretase 2 isoform B preproprotein
placenta-specific 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
2-21; C21orf11; C21orf76; ORF9; PANDER; PRED44
family with sequence similarity 3, member B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
family with sequence similarity 3, member B, transcript variant 1
family with sequence similarity 3, member B, transcript variant 2
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 2 (mouse); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 2 (mouse), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 24 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 2 (mouse)
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 2 (mouse), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 30 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 2 (mouse), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 2 (mouse), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx2
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx2 isoform X1
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx2 isoform X2
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx2 isoform X3
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx2 isoform X4
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1, interferon-inducible protein p78 (mouse); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1, interferon-inducible protein p78 (mouse), transcript variant 1
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1, interferon-inducible protein p78 (mouse), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 75 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1, interferon-inducible protein p78 (mouse), transcript variant 2
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1, interferon-inducible protein p78 (mouse), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 72 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1, interferon-inducible protein p78 (mouse), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 72 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1, interferon-inducible protein p78 (mouse), transcript variant 3
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1, interferon-inducible protein p78 (mouse), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 66 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1, interferon-inducible protein p78 (mouse), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 79 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx1
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx1 isoform X1
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx1 isoform X2
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx1 isoform X3
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx1 isoform X4
interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx1 isoform X5
transmembrane protease, serine 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transmembrane protease, serine 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 45 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protease, serine 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 45 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protease, serine 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 45 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protease, serine 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 51 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protease, serine 2, transcript variant 2
transmembrane protease, serine 2, transcript variant 1
transmembrane protease serine 2 isoform X2
transmembrane protease serine 2 isoform 1
transmembrane protease serine 2 isoform X3
transmembrane protease serine 2 isoform 2
transmembrane protease serine 2 isoform X1
transmembrane protease serine 2 isoform X4
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 111; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 111
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 479; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 479
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 479, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 24% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 112; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 112
ANKK2; ANKRD3; DIK; NKRD3; PKK; PPS2; RIP4
receptor-interacting serine-threonine kinase 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
receptor-interacting serine-threonine kinase 4
receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 4
PR domain containing 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
PR domain containing 15, transcript variant 2
PR domain containing 15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 48 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
PR domain containing 15, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 39 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
PR domain containing 15, transcript variant 1
PR domain zinc finger protein 15 isoform 2
PR domain zinc finger protein 15 isoform X1
PR domain zinc finger protein 15 isoform 1
C2 calcium-dependent domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
C2 calcium-dependent domain containing 2, transcript variant 1
C2 calcium-dependent domain containing 2, transcript variant 2
C2 calcium-dependent domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 37 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
C2 calcium-dependent domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
C2 calcium-dependent domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
C2 calcium-dependent domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
C2 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
C2 domain-containing protein 2 isoform 1 precursor
C2 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
C2 domain-containing protein 2 isoform 2
C2 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
C2 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X5
C2 calcium-dependent domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
C2 domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 21; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 21, transcript variant 2
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 21, transcript variant 3
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 21, transcript variant 1
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 21, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 45 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 21, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 43 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 21, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform S is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 21 isoform S
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 21 isoform X3
isoform L is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 21 isoform L
isoform L is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 21 isoform X1
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 21 isoform X2
ZNF295 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uromodulin-like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001199527.1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001199528.2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_173568.3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001004416.2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_775839.3
isoform 2 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001004416.2
isoform 1 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001186456.1
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 3; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001186457.2
isoform 4 is encoded by transcript variant 4; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 128; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G (WHITE), member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G (WHITE), member 1, transcript variant 5
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G (WHITE), member 1, transcript variant 6
ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1 isoform 5
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G (WHITE), member 1, transcript variant 7
isoform 7 is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1 isoform 7
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G (WHITE), member 1, transcript variant 4
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G (WHITE), member 1, transcript variant 2
ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1 isoform 4
ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1 isoform 2
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G (WHITE), member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 59 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G (WHITE), member 1, transcript variant 3
ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1 isoform X1
ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1 isoform 3
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 492; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
isoform 6 is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1 isoform 6
trefoil factor 3 (intestinal); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
trefoil factor 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
trefoil factor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protease, serine 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protease, serine 3, transcript variant G
transmembrane protease, serine 3, transcript variant F
transmembrane protease, serine 3, transcript variant A
transmembrane protease, serine 3, transcript variant C
isoform 4 is encoded by transcript variant F; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protease serine 3 isoform 4
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protease serine 3 isoform 1
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protease serine 3 isoform 2
transmembrane protease, serine 3, transcript variant D
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant D; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protease serine 3 isoform 3
ubiquitin associated and SH3 domain containing A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ubiquitin associated and SH3 domain containing A, transcript variant 1
ubiquitin associated and SH3 domain containing A, transcript variant 2
ubiquitin associated and SH3 domain containing A, transcript variant 3
ubiquitin associated and SH3 domain containing A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin-associated and SH3 domain-containing protein A isoform 1
ubiquitin-associated and SH3 domain-containing protein A isoform 2
ubiquitin-associated and SH3 domain-containing protein A isoform 3
radial spoke head 1 homolog (Chlamydomonas); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
radial spoke head 1 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
radial spoke head 1 homolog (Chlamydomonas)
radial spoke head 1 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 37 (glucose-6-phosphate transporter), member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 37 (glucose-6-phosphate transporter), member 1
solute carrier family 37 (glucose-6-phosphate transporter), member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 51 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 37 (glucose-6-phosphate transporter), member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 37 (glucose-6-phosphate transporter), member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 18 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycerol-3-phosphate transporter isoform X3
glycerol-3-phosphate transporter isoform X1
glycerol-3-phosphate transporter isoform X2
solute carrier family 37 (glucose-6-phosphate transporter), member 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
glycerol-3-phosphate transporter isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 34% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 48% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphodiesterase 9A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 5
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 1
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 2
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 18
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 9
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 14
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 17
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 20
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 6
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 13
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 12
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 19
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 16
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 3
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 4
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 11
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 8
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 7
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 10
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant 15
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform e is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform e
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform a
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform b
isoform o is encoded by transcript variant 18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform o
isoform h is encoded by transcript variant 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform h
isoform l is encoded by transcript variant 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform l
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform d
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform X2
isoform n is encoded by transcript variant 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform n
isoform f is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform f
isoform k is encoded by transcript variant 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform k
isoform m is encoded by transcript variant 16; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform m
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform c
isoform i is encoded by transcript variant 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform i
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphodiesterase 9A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 27 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform X1
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform X3
isoform j is encoded by transcript variant 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform j
isoform j is encoded by transcript variant 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
high affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9A isoform g
isoform g is encoded by transcript variant 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform g is encoded by transcript variant 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform g is encoded by transcript variant 19; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform g is encoded by transcript variant 20; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
WD repeat domain 4, transcript variant 2
WD repeat domain 4, transcript variant 7
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_048535.1
WD repeat domain 4, transcript variant 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001260476.1
WD repeat domain 4, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001260475.1
WD repeat domain 4, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001260474.1
WD repeat domain 4, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_018669.5
WD repeat domain 4, transcript variant 6
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001260477.1
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tRNA (guanine-N(7)-)-methyltransferase subunit WDR4 isoform 2
tRNA (guanine-N(7)-)-methyltransferase subunit WDR4 isoform 1
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tRNA (guanine-N(7)-)-methyltransferase subunit WDR4 isoform 3
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) flavoprotein 3, 10kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) flavoprotein 3, 10kDa, transcript variant 1
NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) flavoprotein 3, 10kDa, transcript variant 2
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 3, mitochondrial isoform a precursor
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 3, mitochondrial isoform b precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
microRNA 5692b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PBX/knotted 1 homeobox 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
PBX/knotted 1 homeobox 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 56 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
cystathionine-beta-synthase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cystathionine-beta-synthase, transcript variant 3
cystathionine-beta-synthase, transcript variant 2
cystathionine-beta-synthase, transcript variant 1
U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 24 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, transcript variant a
U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, transcript variant b
U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, transcript variant c
U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
splicing factor U2AF 35 kDa subunit isoform X1
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
splicing factor U2AF 35 kDa subunit isoform a
splicing factor U2AF 35 kDa subunit isoform X2
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
splicing factor U2AF 35 kDa subunit isoform b
splicing factor U2AF 35 kDa subunit isoform X3
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant c; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
splicing factor U2AF 35 kDa subunit isoform c
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L51 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
crystallin, alpha A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
crystallin, alpha A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 322; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 322
uncharacterized LOC101928399, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101928399, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101928399, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
salt-inducible kinase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 319; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 319
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 313; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 313
heat shock transcription factor 2 binding protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
heat shock transcription factor 2 binding protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock transcription factor 2 binding protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock transcription factor 2 binding protein
heat shock factor 2-binding protein isoform X2
heat shock factor 2-binding protein isoform X1
heat shock transcription factor 2 binding protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock factor 2-binding protein isoform X3
ribosomal protein L31 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
H2B histone family, member S (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal RNA processing 1B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal RNA processing 1B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 47 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ribosomal RNA processing protein 1 homolog B
ribosomal RNA processing protein 1 homolog B isoform X1
pyridoxal (pyridoxine, vitamin B6) kinase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
pyridoxal (pyridoxine, vitamin B6) kinase
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_003681.4
pyridoxal (pyridoxine, vitamin B6) kinase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 83 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pyridoxal (pyridoxine, vitamin B6) kinase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 101 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pyridoxal (pyridoxine, vitamin B6) kinase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 102 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
pyridoxal (pyridoxine, vitamin B6) kinase, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pyridoxal (pyridoxine, vitamin B6) kinase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 104 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pyridoxal (pyridoxine, vitamin B6) kinase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 102 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
pyridoxal (pyridoxine, vitamin B6) kinase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 106 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cystatin B (stefin B); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protein 97 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal RNA processing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal RNA processing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 30 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal RNA processing protein 1 homolog A
ribosomal RNA processing protein 1 homolog A isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC284837; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
myosin, light chain 6 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 3, transcript variant 1
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 mRNAs, 76 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 3, transcript variant 2
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 75 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase gamma isoform X1
1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase gamma isoform X2
1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase gamma
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 74 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase gamma isoform X3
EHOC-1; EHOC1; GT334; TMEM1; TRS130; TRS30
trafficking protein particle complex 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
trafficking protein particle complex 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 75 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex 10, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 10
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 10 isoform X1
H2A histone family, member Z pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
trafficking protein particle complex 10, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 72 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 10 isoform X2
PWP2 periodic tryptophan protein homolog (yeast); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PWP2 periodic tryptophan protein homolog (yeast)
chromosome 21 open reading frame 33; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 33, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 21 open reading frame 33, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 21 open reading frame 33, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 21 open reading frame 33, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 21 open reading frame 33, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_004649.6
chromosome 21 open reading frame 33, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_198155.3
chromosome 21 open reading frame 33, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ES1 protein homolog, mitochondrial isoform X4
ES1 protein homolog, mitochondrial isoform X1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_004640.3
isoform Ia precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ES1 protein homolog, mitochondrial isoform Ia precursor
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_937798.3
isoform Ib precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ES1 protein homolog, mitochondrial isoform Ib precursor
ES1 protein homolog, mitochondrial isoform X2
ES1 protein homolog, mitochondrial isoform X3
ES1 protein homolog, mitochondrial isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
B7-H2; B7H2; B7RP-1; B7RP1; CD275; GL50; ICOS-L; ICOSL; LICOS
inducible T-cell co-stimulator ligand; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
inducible T-cell co-stimulator ligand, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
inducible T-cell co-stimulator ligand, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
inducible T-cell co-stimulator ligand, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
inducible T-cell co-stimulator ligand, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
inducible T-cell co-stimulator ligand, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
inducible T-cell co-stimulator ligand, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
inducible T-cell co-stimulator ligand, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DNA (cytosine-5-)-methyltransferase 3-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DNA (cytosine-5-)-methyltransferase 3-like, transcript variant 2
DNA (cytosine-5-)-methyltransferase 3-like, transcript variant 1
DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3-like isoform 2
DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3-like isoform 1
autoimmune regulator; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
autoimmune regulator, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphofructokinase, liver; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
phosphofructokinase, liver, transcript variant 1
phosphofructokinase, liver, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_002626.4
phosphofructokinase, liver, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 113 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructokinase, liver type isoform X2
phosphofructokinase, liver, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 118 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphofructokinase, liver, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 116 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructokinase, liver type isoform X1
phosphofructokinase, liver, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 111 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
6-phosphofructokinase, liver type isoform X3
6-phosphofructokinase, liver type isoform X4
chromosome 21 open reading frame 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 2, transcript variant 2
chromosome 21 open reading frame 2, transcript variant 3
chromosome 21 open reading frame 2, transcript variant 1
chromosome 21 open reading frame 2, transcript variant 4
nuclear encoded mitochondrial protein C21orf2 isoform 2
nuclear encoded mitochondrial protein C21orf2 isoform 3
nuclear encoded mitochondrial protein C21orf2 isoform 1
EREG1; KNP3; LTRPC2; NUDT9H; NUDT9L1; TRPC7
transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 40 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 33 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 2, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_038257.1
transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 2, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_003307.3
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2 isoform X1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_003298.1
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2
transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
LRRC3 antisense RNA 1 (head to head); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
leucine rich repeat containing 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_030891.3
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 3 precursor
LRRC3 downstream neighbor (non-protein coding)
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
MT-ND6 pseudogene 21; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
MT-ND5 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
thrombospondin-type laminin G domain and EAR repeats; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
thrombospondin-type laminin G domain and EAR repeats, transcript variant 1
thrombospondin-type laminin G domain and EAR repeats, transcript variant 2
thrombospondin-type laminin G domain and EAR repeats, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
thrombospondin-type laminin G domain and EAR repeat-containing protein isoform X2
thrombospondin-type laminin G domain and EAR repeat-containing protein isoform 1 precursor
thrombospondin-type laminin G domain and EAR repeat-containing protein isoform 2
TSPEAR antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
thrombospondin-type laminin G domain and EAR repeats, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 60% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
thrombospondin-type laminin G domain and EAR repeat-containing protein isoform X1
chromosome 21 open reading frame 90; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 90, transcript variant 1
chromosome 21 open reading frame 90, transcript variant 2
keratin associated protein 10-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 10-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
keratin associated protein 10-2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins, and 4% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_198693.2
keratin-associated protein 10-2 isoform X1
keratin associated protein 10-3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 10-4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 10-5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 10-6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 10-7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_198689.2
The RefSeq transcript has 16 substitutions and 2 indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 10-7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 Proteins
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_941962.1
The RefSeq protein has 6 substitutions and 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin-associated protein 10-7 isoform X1
keratin associated protein 10-8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 10-9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 10-10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_181688.1
keratin associated protein 10-10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
keratin-associated protein 10-10 isoform X1
keratin associated protein 10-11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
keratin associated protein 10-11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 4 Proteins
keratin-associated protein 10-11 isoform X1
keratin associated protein 12-4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 12-3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 12-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
inner membrane protein, mitochondrial (mitofilin) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin associated protein 12-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 10-12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin associated protein 10-13, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2G 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2G 2, transcript variant 3
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2G 2, transcript variant 1
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2G 2, transcript variant 2
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 G2 isoform 1
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 G2 isoform 2
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 G2 isoform 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
small ubiquitin-like modifier 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
small ubiquitin-like modifier 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
small ubiquitin-like modifier 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
small ubiquitin-related modifier 3 isoform X2
small ubiquitin-related modifier 3 precursor
small ubiquitin-related modifier 3 isoform X1
pituitary tumor-transforming 1 interacting protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
pituitary tumor-transforming 1 interacting protein
pituitary tumor-transforming 1 interacting protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 43 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pituitary tumor-transforming 1 interacting protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 43 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pituitary tumor-transforming 1 interacting protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 44 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 protein-interacting protein isoform X1
pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 protein-interacting protein isoform X2
pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 protein-interacting protein isoform X3
pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 protein-interacting protein precursor
CD18; LAD; LCAMB; LFA-1; MAC-1; MF17; MFI7
integrin, beta 2 (complement component 3 receptor 3 and 4 subunit); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
integrin, beta 2 (complement component 3 receptor 3 and 4 subunit), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 79 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
integrin, beta 2 (complement component 3 receptor 3 and 4 subunit), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 98 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrin, beta 2 (complement component 3 receptor 3 and 4 subunit), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 96 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
integrin, beta 2 (complement component 3 receptor 3 and 4 subunit), transcript variant 2
integrin, beta 2 (complement component 3 receptor 3 and 4 subunit), transcript variant 1
ITGB2 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ITGB2 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
ITGB2 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
ITGB2 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 3
ITGB2 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 4
ITGB2 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 5
ITGB2 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 6
chromosome 21 open reading frame 67; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 67, transcript variant 1
chromosome 21 open reading frame 67, transcript variant 2
family with sequence similarity 207, member A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
family with sequence similarity 207, member A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 207, member A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 207, member A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 207, member A
family with sequence similarity 207, member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 207, member A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 207, member A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 163; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 163
C21orf113; NCRNA00162; NLC1-C; NLC1C; PRED74
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 162; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 162
signal sequence receptor, delta pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
signal sequence receptor, delta pseudogene 1
adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific, B1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific, B1, transcript variant 4
adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific, B1, transcript variant 2
adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific, B1, transcript variant 8
adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific, B1, transcript variant 3
adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific, B1, transcript variant 1
adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific, B1, transcript variant 6
adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific, B1, transcript variant 7
adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific, B1, transcript variant 5
double-stranded RNA-specific editase 1 isoform 3
double-stranded RNA-specific editase 1 isoform 7
double-stranded RNA-specific editase 1 isoform 2
double-stranded RNA-specific editase 1 isoform 1
protein O-fucosyltransferase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein O-fucosyltransferase 2, transcript variant 3
protein O-fucosyltransferase 2, transcript variant 2
protein O-fucosyltransferase 2, transcript variant 1
GDP-fucose protein O-fucosyltransferase 2 isoform C precursor
GDP-fucose protein O-fucosyltransferase 2 isoform A precursor
uncharacterized LOC642852; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 316; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 316
MT-CO1 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC101928745, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC101928745, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101928745, transcript variant X3
collagen, type XVIII, alpha 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
collagen, type XVIII, alpha 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 113 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen, type XVIII, alpha 1, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_130445.2
collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain isoform X4
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_569712.2
isoform 2 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain isoform 2 precursor
COL18A1 antisense RNA 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
COL18A1 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
COL18A1 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
COL18A1 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
collagen, type XVIII, alpha 1, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_030582.3
collagen, type XVIII, alpha 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 110 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen, type XVIII, alpha 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 93 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain isoform X1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_085059.2
isoform 1 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain isoform 1 precursor
collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain isoform X2
collagen, type XVIII, alpha 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 108 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain isoform X3
collagen, type XVIII, alpha 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 108 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 19 (folate transporter), member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 19 (folate transporter), member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 34 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 19 (folate transporter), member 1, transcript variant 2
solute carrier family 19 (folate transporter), member 1, transcript variant 1
solute carrier family 19 (folate transporter), member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 19 (folate transporter), member 1, transcript variant 3
uncharacterized LOC100129027; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
poly(rC) binding protein 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 22 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant 1
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant 2
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
poly(rC) binding protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen, type VI, alpha 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, alpha type, 6 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
collagen, type VI, alpha 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collagen, type VI, alpha 2, transcript variant 2C2
collagen, type VI, alpha 2, transcript variant 2C2a'
collagen, type VI, alpha 2, transcript variant 2C2a
isoform 2C2 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2C2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collagen alpha-2(VI) chain isoform 2C2 precursor
isoform 2C2a precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2C2a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collagen alpha-2(VI) chain isoform 2C2a precursor
isoform 2C2a' precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2C2a'; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collagen alpha-2(VI) chain isoform 2C2a' precursor
formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase, transcript variant X2
formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase, transcript variant B
formimidoyltransferase-cyclodeaminase isoform X1
formimidoyltransferase cyclodeaminase, transcript variant A
formimidoyltransferase-cyclodeaminase isoform X2
spermatogenesis and centriole associated 1-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
spermatogenesis and centriole associated 1-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
spermatogenesis and centriole associated 1-like, transcript variant 2
spermatogenesis and centriole associated 1-like, transcript variant 1
spermatogenesis and centriole associated 1-like isoform X1
lanosterol synthase (2,3-oxidosqualene-lanosterol cyclase); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
lanosterol synthase (2,3-oxidosqualene-lanosterol cyclase), transcript variant 2
lanosterol synthase (2,3-oxidosqualene-lanosterol cyclase), transcript variant 3
lanosterol synthase (2,3-oxidosqualene-lanosterol cyclase), transcript variant 1
lanosterol synthase (2,3-oxidosqualene-lanosterol cyclase), transcript variant 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
C21orf85; MCM3AP-AS; MCM3APAS; MCM3APASB; NCRNA00031
MCM3AP antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 associated protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 associated protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 mRNAs, 128 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 associated protein, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 mRNAs, 129 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 associated protein, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 mRNAs, 127 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 associated protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 mRNAs, 127 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 associated protein
80 kDa MCM3-associated protein isoform X1
80 kDa MCM3-associated protein isoform X2
80 kDa MCM3-associated protein isoform X3
80 kDa MCM3-associated protein isoform X4
ybeY metallopeptidase (putative); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ybeY metallopeptidase (putative), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ybeY metallopeptidase (putative), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ybeY metallopeptidase (putative), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ybeY metallopeptidase (putative), transcript variant 1
ybeY metallopeptidase (putative), transcript variant 2
ybeY metallopeptidase (putative), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 21 open reading frame 58; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
chromosome 21 open reading frame 58, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 21 open reading frame 58, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C21orf58 isoform X2
chromosome 21 open reading frame 58, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 21 open reading frame 58, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 21 open reading frame 58, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromosome 21 open reading frame 58, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_058180.3
The RefSeq transcript has 3 indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized protein C21orf58 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein C21orf58 isoform X3
uncharacterized protein C21orf58 isoform X4
uncharacterized protein C21orf58 isoform X5
KEN; MOPD2; PCN; PCNT2; PCNTB; PCTN2; SCKL4
pericentrin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 68 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 65 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 63 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal protein L18a pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A (Drosophila); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A (Drosophila), transcript variant 1
DIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A (Drosophila), transcript variant 7
DIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A (Drosophila), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 51 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A (Drosophila), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 49 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
DIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A (Drosophila), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 39 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
DIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A (Drosophila), transcript variant X3
DIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A (Drosophila), transcript variant 5
DIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A (Drosophila), transcript variant 2
DIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A (Drosophila), transcript variant 3
DIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A (Drosophila), transcript variant 6
DIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A (Drosophila), transcript variant 4
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform a
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform g
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X1
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X2
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform X3
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform e
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform b
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform c
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform f
disco-interacting protein 2 homolog A isoform d
DIP2A intronic transcript 1 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DIP2A intronic transcript 1 (non-protein coding)
S100 calcium binding protein B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein arginine methyltransferase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant 1
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant 2
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant 3
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant 5
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant 4
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X3
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 48 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein arginine methyltransferase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 69 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 2 isoform X2
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 2 isoform X3
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 2 isoform 1
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 2 isoform X1
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 2 isoform 2
isoform 4 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 2 isoform 4
protein arginine N-methyltransferase 2 isoform 3
destrin (actin depolymerizing factor) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L23a pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.