K08D8.4 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
hsp-16.41 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
pho-11 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
F49F1.5 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
acs-7 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
F58G6.7 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
ZK896.5 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
acdh-2 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
F22B7.9 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
Genomic response of C. elegans after infection with Microbacterium nematophilum. The interaction between the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and a Gram-positive bacterial pathogen, Microbacterium nematophilum, provides a model for an innate immune response in nematodes. This pathogen adheres to the rectal and post-anal cuticle of the worm, causing slowed growth, constipation, and a defensive swelling response of rectal hypodermal cells. To explore the genomic responses that the worm activates after pathogenic attack we used microarray analysis of transcriptional changes induced after 6 hr infection, comparing virulent with avirulent infection.
C15A11.7 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
C17H12.8 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
cpr-4 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
ZK1307.1 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
C17H1.7 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
far-7 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
Y53F4B.45 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
ech-9 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
D1054.8 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
H02F09.3 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
fmo-2 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
ivd-1 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
ugt-18 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
C49C8.5 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
valv-1 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
T23F4.2 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
K08D8.5 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
clec-70 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
Y41D4B.17 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
C17C3.1 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
E02D9.1 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
C50F4.9 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
F49H6.5 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
F53B2.8 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
Y37H2A.14 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
(Factor value) INFECT/Microbacterium nematophilum UV336
Y54G2A.11 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
F09F7.4 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
clec-82 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
Analysis of 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
F58F9.7 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
clec-174 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
C36B1.6 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
clec-60 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
F53A9.8 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
acs-2 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
sulp-2 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
W07B8.4 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
C09B8.4 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
tts-1 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
M28.8 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
ugt-26 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
oac-14 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
sodh-1 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
clec-17 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
Y39B6A.1 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
F09F7.6 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
(Factor value) INFECT/Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102
ZK228.4 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
C50F7.5 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
R08E5.3 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
T10G3.1 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
T24E12.5 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
(Sample) organism/Caenorhabditis elegans
C08E8.4 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
C35A5.3 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
scl-2 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
(Sample) specimen with known storage state/fresh specimen
ilys-3 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
F08A8.2 DOWN in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
clec-62 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
mpk-2 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
lys-7 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
K05F1.10 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
F21C10.10 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
K08D10.14 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
ttr-17 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
ins-11 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'
C07E3.3 UP in 'Microbacterium nematophilum CBX102' vs 'Microbacterium nematophilum UV336'