RAB11FIP2 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
EPB41L4A-AS1 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-443P15.2 UP in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-479G22.8 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-342K6.1 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-9E17.1 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-67L2.2 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-350F4.2 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
GS1-358P8.4 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
TNFRSF11A DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
Mock and poliovirus infected A549 cells were used as model system to assess Nanostring's technology for detecting mRNA transcripts, linearity of signal, reproducibility and fold change measurements. As a comparison, the same samples were measured using Affymetrix U133 2.0 plus arrays and several genes were followed up using RT-PCR. All samples for all platforms were performed in triplicate
CTA-445C9.14 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
HNRNPU-AS1 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
LINC00938 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-145M9.4 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-469M7.1 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-95D17.1 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-38P22.2 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-212P7.2 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-156E6.1 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
CTC-444N24.8 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
LINC00473 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-4O1.2 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP3-428L16.2 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
CTD-2186M15.3 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
GABPB1-AS1 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
ASH1L-AS1 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
ANKRD10-IT1 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
(Sample) biosource provider/Roger E. Bumgarner
RP11-53O19.3 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP11-121C2.2 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
HNRNPA2B1 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
RP5-1024G6.8 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'
CTC-444N24.11 DOWN in 'poliovirus' vs 'mock'