AT3G04030 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT1G79110 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
(Factor value) GENOTYPE/wild type genotype
AT1G77280 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
ATSERAT2;1 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT4G24700 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT2G39980 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT2G27420 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT3G60690 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT2G21320 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT2G19650 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT1G12320 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT3G44450 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT1G78070 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT3G56260 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT2G41250 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
We performed a tranascriptomic analysis of Ler, ebs and shl-2 plants in order to reveal targets whose transcription is regulated by EBS and SHL. The analysis was performed in WT plants (Ler), as well as mutants plants in which the expression of EBS and SHL was previously shown to be null, namely ebs and shl-2 mutant. To perform this study, plants were grown for 18 days under short days (SD) conditions (8h light, 16h darkness) in MS solid media. Three independent biological samples were hybridized separately.
AT1G60590 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT5G54470 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT1G75580 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT1G10640 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT3G03440 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT1G64500 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT2G36220 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT5G11460 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT3G52740 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT1G72920 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT1G48100 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT2G21210 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT3G22540 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT1G20070 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT2G15020 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT4G24780 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'
AT3G21890 DOWN in 'shl-2' vs 'wild type'