Homo sapiens chromosome 22, GRCh38 Primary Assembly.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
zinc finger protein 83 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19kDa interacting protein 3 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
YME1L1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor, family 11, subfamily H, member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Rho GTPase activating protein 42 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
fatty acyl CoA reductase 2 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 10 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
single stranded DNA binding protein 4 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
pleckstrin homology domain containing, family B (evectins) member 2 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
NEK2 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
neurofibromin 1 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
POTE ankyrin domain family, member H; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
GRAM domain containing 4 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
double homeobox A pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
neurobeachin pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 40 homolog (yeast) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromosome 2 open reading frame 27A pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 34 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family D (ALD), member 1, pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
poly(A) binding protein, cytoplasmic 1 pseudogene 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 9, subfamily B (NHA1, cation proton antiporter 1), member 1 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ACTR3B pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
potassium large conductance calcium-activated channel, subfamily M, beta member 3 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 8 (theta)-like 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
fatty acid binding protein 5 pseudogene 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
transmembrane phosphatase with tensin homology pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; ornithine transporter) member 15 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ANKRD62P1-PARP4P3 readthrough, transcribed pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
von Willebrand factor pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
XK, Kell blood group complex subunit-related family, member 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
heat shock transcription factor, Y-linked 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glycoprotein M6B pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 402, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
MT-ND1 pseudogene 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin kappa variable 2/OR22-4 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin kappa variable 2/OR22-3 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin kappa variable 3/OR22-2 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin kappa variable 1/OR22-1 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
GRB2-associated binding protein family, member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
interleukin 9 receptor pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
vomeronasal 1 receptor 9 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 7 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CANDF5; CD217; CDw217; hIL-17R; IL-17RA; IL17R
interleukin 17 receptor A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L31 pseudogene 62; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC100996342; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
CECR5 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L32 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
family with sequence similarity 32, member B (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 3 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
telomeric repeat binding factor 2, interacting protein pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Charcot-Leyden crystal protein pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily A, member 1 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 25 (glutamate carrier), member 18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC101929372; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal 31kDa, V1 subunit E1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
BH3 interacting domain death agonist; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3198-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 528; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 648; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Ras-homolog enriched in brain pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC100192420; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 26; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ADP-ribosylation factor-like 2 binding protein pseudogene 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
tubulin, alpha 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 5 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 26 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
transmembrane protein 191B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, catalytic, alpha pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RIM-BP3; RIM-BP3.1; RIM-BP3.A; RIMBP3.1; RIMBP3A
RIMS binding protein 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
sushi domain containing 2 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
carbonic anhydrase XV, pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 26 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 26 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
gamma-glutamyltransferase 3 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E2F transcription factor 6 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
breakpoint cluster region pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
HSPOX2; PIG6; POX; PRODH1; PRODH2; TP53I6
proline dehydrogenase (oxidase) 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 5 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 10 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 11 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L28 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
testis-specific serine kinase 1A pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DGCR13; DGS-H; DGS-I; DGSH; DGSI; ES2; Es2el
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
testis-specific serine kinase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
goosecoid homeobox 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC100652736; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; citrate transporter), member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
clathrin, heavy chain-like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L34 pseudogene 35; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
dishevelled segment polarity protein 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin 18 pseudogene 62; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
histone cell cycle regulator; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L40; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
chromosome 22 open reading frame 39; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin fusion degradation 1 like (yeast); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cell division cycle 45; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
claudin 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 895; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 3 open reading frame 38 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC100420103; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CDCREL; CDCREL-1; CDCREL1; H5; HCDCREL-1; PNUTL1
septin 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SEPT5-GP1BB readthrough; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glycoprotein Ib (platelet), beta polypeptide; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CAFS; CTHM; DGCR; DGS; DORV; TBX1C; TGA; VCFS
T-box 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), beta polypeptide 1-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L7a pseudogene 70; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromosome 22 open reading frame 29; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
thioredoxin reductase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L8 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
catechol-O-methyltransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 4761; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 185; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DGCR8 microprocessor complex subunit; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 3618; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 1306; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tRNA methyltransferase 2 homolog A (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA mir-6816; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RAN binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
uncharacterized LOC388849; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
uncharacterized LOC284865; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 896; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
reticulon 4 receptor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 1286; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proline dehydrogenase (oxidase) 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 6-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger protein 74; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
scavenger receptor class F, member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
kelch-like family member 22; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
kelch-like family member 12 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin 18 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ARC105; CAG7A; CTG7A; PCQAP; TIG-1; TIG1; TNRC7
mediator complex subunit 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 4, neutral membrane (neutral sphingomyelinase-3) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 4, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
small G protein signaling modulator 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 9, subfamily A (NHE3, cation proton antiporter 3), member 3 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
abhydrolase domain containing 17A pseudogene P4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 4 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
breakpoint cluster region pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
transmembrane protein 191A (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, catalytic, alpha; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
D22S673; HC2; HCF2; HCII; HLS2; LS2; THPH10
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade D (heparin cofactor), member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
synaptosomal-associated protein, 29kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
v-crk avian sarcoma virus CT10 oncogene homolog-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
apoptosis-inducing factor, mitochondrion-associated, 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
leucine-zipper-like transcription regulator 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
THAP domain containing 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
THAP7 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tubulin, alpha 3f, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel, 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 7, member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 649; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel, 6 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 14 open reading frame 166B pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tubulin, alpha 3g, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
breakpoint cluster region pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
family with sequence similarity 230, member B (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 8 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
breakpoint cluster region pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 26 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
sushi domain containing 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RIMS binding protein 3B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
hypermethylated in cancer 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transmembrane protein 191C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, catalytic, alpha pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RIMS binding protein 3C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2L 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
YdjC homolog (bacterial); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
coiled-coil domain containing 116; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
stromal cell-derived factor 2-like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 301b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 130b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
peptidylprolyl isomerase (cyclophilin)-like 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
yippee-like 1 (Drosophila); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ERK; ERK2; ERT1; MAPK2; p38; p40; p41; p41mapk; P42MAPK; PRKM1; PRKM2
mitogen-activated protein kinase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 493; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent, 1F; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
immunoglobulin lambda locus; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (I)-70 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 4-69; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (I)-68 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 10-67 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (IV)-66-1 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (V)-66 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (IV)-65 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (IV)-64 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (I)-63 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 1-62 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 8-61; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
NAD kinase 2, mitochondrial pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
abhydrolase domain containing 17A pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 4-60; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (IV)-59 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (V)-58 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
bone morphogenetic protein 6 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 6-57; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (I)-56 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 11-55 (non-functional); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
OTU domain containing 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 10-54; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (IV)-53 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
URI1, prefoldin-like chaperone pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
pre-B lymphocyte 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
BMS1 pseudogene 20; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic,Gnomon.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 5-52; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 1-51; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 1-50 (non-functional); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ash2 (absent, small, or homeotic)-like (Drosophila) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 9-49; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 5-48 (non-functional); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 1-47; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 7-46 (gene/pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 5-45; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 1-44; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 7-43; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (I)-42 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (VII)-41-1 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 1-41 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 1-40; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ash2 (absent, small, or homeotic)-like (Drosophila) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (I)-38 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 5-37; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 1-36; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 7-35 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 280B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic,Gnomon.
zinc finger protein 280A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC648691; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 2-34 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 2-33 (non-functional); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-32 (non-functional); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-31 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-30 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
breakpoint cluster region pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 1, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic,Gnomon.
gamma-glutamyltransferase-like activity 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-29 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 2-28 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-27; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-26 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (VI)-25-1 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-25; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-24 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 2-23; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (VI)-22-1 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-22 (gene/pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-21; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable (I)-20 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-19; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 2-18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-17 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-16; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-15 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 2-14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-13 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromosome 2 open reading frame 27B pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 2-11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-9 (gene/pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 650; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 2-8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-7 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-6 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 2-5 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-4 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 4-3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-2 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda variable 3-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda joining 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda constant 1 (Mcg marker); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda joining 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda constant 2 (Kern-Oz- marker); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda joining 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda constant 3 (Kern-Oz+ marker); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda joining 4 (non-functional); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda constant 4 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda joining 5 (non-functional); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda constant 5 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda joining 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda constant 6 (Kern+Oz- marker, gene/pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda joining 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda constant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
rhabdoid tumor deletion region gene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), alpha z polypeptide; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RAB36, member RAS oncogene family; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
l(3)mbt-like 4 (Drosophila) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
breakpoint cluster region pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
breakpoint cluster region; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 4 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 11, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S10 pseudogene 30; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
carboxylesterase 5A pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 8 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
prostate cancer associated transcript 14 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
14.1; AGM2; CD179b; IGL1; IGL5; IGLJ14.1; IGLL; IGO; IGVPB; VPREB2
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 22 open reading frame 43; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
glucuronidase, beta pseudogene 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
argininosuccinate lyase pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger protein 70; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
pre-B lymphocyte 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 22 open reading frame 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain containing 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
matrix metallopeptidase 11 (stromelysin 3); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BAF47; hSNFS; INI1; MRD15; RDT; RTPS1; Sfh1p; SNF5; SNF5L1; Snr1
SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily b, member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
derlin 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC284889; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
macrophage migration inhibitory factor (glycosylation-inhibiting factor); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
kelch-like family member 5 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
glutathione S-transferase theta 2B (gene/pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
D-dopachrome tautomerase-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
D-dopachrome tautomerase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glutathione S-transferase theta 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glutathione S-transferase theta pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
calcineurin binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
sushi domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
gamma-glutamyltransferase 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 4 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 9, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
breakpoint cluster region pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S10 pseudogene 29; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SPECC1L-ADORA2A readthrough (NMD candidate); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
adenosine A2a receptor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ADORA2A antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ureidopropionase, beta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
guanylyl cyclase domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein D3 polypeptide 18kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
gamma-glutamyltransferase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
family with sequence similarity 211, member B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
breakpoint cluster region pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 10, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ADP-ribosylation factor-like 5A pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ARP2 actin-related protein 2 homolog (yeast) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cysteine-rich protein 1 (intestinal) pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
piwi-like RNA-mediated gene silencing 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
topoisomerase (DNA) I pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small G protein signaling modulator 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protein 211; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
KIAA1671; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
uncharacterized LOC100128531; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
stathmin-like 3 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
crystallin, beta B3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
crystallin, beta B2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 3, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PHD finger protein 10 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
crystallin, beta B2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA mir-6817; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
adrenergic, beta, receptor kinase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
v-yes-1 Yamaguchi sarcoma viral oncogene homolog pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 494; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
myosin XVIIIB; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
seizure related 6 homolog (mouse)-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 495; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S3A pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
aspartate beta-hydroxylase domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
SRR1 domain containing; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tuftelin interacting protein 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 548j; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high mobility group box 1 pseudogene 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
crystallin, beta B1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
crystallin, beta A4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
iron-sulfur cluster assembly 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
C22orf35; GOMAFU; LINC00066; NCRNA00066; RNCR2
myocardial infarction associated transcript (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L15 pseudogene 22; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
meningioma (disrupted in balanced translocation) 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein, beta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TTC28 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3199-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3199-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 28; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA mir-5739; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CDS1; CHK2; hCds1; HuCds1; LFS2; PP1425; RAD53
checkpoint kinase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
HscB mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster co-chaperone; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
coiled-coil domain containing 117; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
X-box binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 9 open reading frame 16 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc and ring finger 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ZNRF3 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 22 open reading frame 31; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
kringle containing transmembrane protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
EMI domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
rhomboid domain containing 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
EWS RNA-binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
growth arrest-specific 2 like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RAS-like, family 10, member A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
adaptor-related protein complex 1, beta 1 subunit; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3653; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 125; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ret finger protein-like 4A pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
NCRNA00006; RFPL1-AS; RFPL1-AS1; RFPL1AS
RFPL1 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ret finger protein-like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
neurofilament, heavy polypeptide; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
THO complex 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
nipsnap homolog 1 (C. elegans); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
neurofibromin 2 (merlin); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribulose-5-phosphate-3-epimerase pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
calcium binding protein 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
zinc finger, matrin-type 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
HSPC051; HSPC119; HSPC151; QCR9; UCCR7.2; UCRC
ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase, complex III subunit X; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
myotubularin related protein 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U5F small nuclear 5, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA mir-6818; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
calponin 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
HORMA domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L36 pseudogene 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S3a pseudogene 51; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
leukemia inhibitory factor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
oncostatin M; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
GATS protein-like 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TBC1 domain family, member 10A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
splicing factor 3a, subunit 1, 120kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain containing 157; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
KIAA1656 protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ring finger protein 215; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SEC14-like 2 (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial fission process 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc transporter ZIP1-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SEC14-like 3 (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
syndecan 4 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SEC14-like 4 (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
SEC14-like 6 (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
signal-regulatory protein alpha pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
galactose-3-O-sulfotransferase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
pescadillo ribosomal biogenesis factor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
D22S676; D22S750; II; TC; TC II; TC-2; TC2; TCII
transcobalamin II; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 35, member E4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L13a pseudogene 26; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
dual specificity phosphatase 18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
oxysterol binding protein 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 3200; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4H pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
MORC2 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
taurine up-regulated 1 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
smoothelin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
selenoprotein M; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase J; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein S15a pseudogene 37; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
phospholipase A2, group III; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3928; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ring finger protein 185; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
LIM domain kinase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 14B pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
phosphoinositide-3-kinase interacting protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
dJ400N23; MAZR; PATZ; RIAZ; ZBTB19; ZNF278; ZSG
POZ (BTB) and AT hook containing zinc finger 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
developmentally regulated GTP binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 28, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
H2A histone family, member Z pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S18 pseudogene 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA mir-7109; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proline rich 14-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DEP domain containing 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
chromosome 22 open reading frame 24; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein, eta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein S17 pseudogene 16; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 5 (sodium/glucose cotransporter), member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
adaptor-related protein complex 1, beta 1 subunit pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
adaptor-related protein complex 1, beta 1 subunit pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromosome 22 open reading frame 42; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ret finger protein-like 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 5 (glucose activated ion channel), member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cleavage and polyadenylation specific factor 1, 160kDa pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ret finger protein-like 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NCRNA00005; RFPL3-AS; RFPL3-AS1; RFPL3ANT; RFPL3AS
RFPL3 antisense; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC339666; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like 4 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA 2',3'-cyclic phosphate and 5'-OH ligase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BPI fold containing family C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
F-box protein 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
synapsin III; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 497; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
like-glycosyltransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 4764; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
LARGE antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
aconitase 2, mitochondrial pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
intestine-specific homeobox; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIb pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
HMG box domain containing 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
target of myb1 (chicken); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3909; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA mir-6069; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
heme oxygenase (decycling) 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
minichromosome maintenance complex component 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
tRNA methyltransferase 11 homolog (S. cerevisiae) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RASD family, member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
myoglobin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
apolipoprotein L, 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S16 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
apolipoprotein L, 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
dJ106I20.3; Fox-2; FOX2; fxh; HNRBP2; HRNBP2; RBM9; RTA
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L41 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplex, 9, pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
apolipoprotein L, 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
MT-ND1 pseudogene 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
apolipoprotein L, 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
apolipoprotein L, 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
apolipoprotein L, 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
BDPLT6; DFNA17; EPSTS; FTNS; MHA; NMHC-II-A; NMMHC-IIA; NMMHCA
myosin, heavy chain 9, non-muscle; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA mir-6819; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein S15a pseudogene 38; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
thioredoxin 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
FAD-dependent oxidoreductase domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit D; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
calcium channel, voltage-dependent, gamma subunit 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
intraflagellar transport 27 homolog (Chlamydomonas); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
parvalbumin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
neutrophil cytosolic factor 4, 40kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
colony stimulating factor 2 receptor, beta, low-affinity (granulocyte-macrophage); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
colony stimulating factor 2 receptor, beta, low-affinity (granulocyte-macrophage) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized protein FLJ39582-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
testis expressed 33; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (rhodanese); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transmembrane protease, serine 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
interleukin 2 receptor, beta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
somatostatin receptor 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L39 pseudogene 41; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 2 (rho family, small GTP binding protein Rac2); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cytohesin 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
extracellular leucine-rich repeat and fibronectin type III domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
MFNG O-fucosylpeptide 3-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
caspase recruitment domain family, member 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CDC42 effector protein (Rho GTPase binding) 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
golgi-associated, gamma adaptin ear containing, ARF binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
SH3-domain binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC101927051; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
pyridoxal (pyridoxine, vitamin B6) phosphatase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
nucleolar protein 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TRIO and F-actin binding protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
H1 histone family, member 0; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glycine C-acetyltransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
galanin receptor 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ankyrin repeat domain 54; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 658; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 659; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
EIF3EIP; EIF3S11; EIF3S6IP; HSPC021; HSPC025; MSTP005
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit L; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
MICAL-like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
chromosome 22 open reading frame 23; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
polymerase (RNA) II (DNA directed) polypeptide F; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA mir-6820; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 4534; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein interacting with PRKCA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 16 (monocarboxylate transporter), member 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BAI1-associated protein 2-like 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
CaI-PLA2; GVI; INAD1; iPLA2; IPLA2-VIA; iPLA2beta; NBIA2; NBIA2A; NBIA2B; PARK14; PLA2; PNPLA9
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
v-maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog F; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protein 184B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
casein kinase 1, epsilon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TPTE and PTEN homologous inositol lipid phosphatase pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
KDEL (Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu) endoplasmic reticulum protein retention receptor 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box helicase 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DNA meiotic recombinase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
family with sequence similarity 227, member A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
arb1; C22orf2; CBY; HS508I15A; PGEA1; PIGEA-14; PIGEA14
chibby homolog 1 (Drosophila); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 22 homolog (yeast); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Josephin domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
GTP binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
peroxiredoxin 3 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Sad1 and UNC84 domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
dynein, axonemal, light chain 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
neuronal pentraxin receptor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromobox homolog 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
A3B; APOBEC1L; ARCD3; ARP4; bK150C2.2; DJ742C19.2; PHRBNL
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
APOBEC3B antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
A3C; APOBEC1L; ARDC2; ARDC4; ARP5; bK150C2.3; PBI
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3D; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3F; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3G; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3H; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytochrome c oxidase subunit Vb pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromobox homolog 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
FUN14 domain containing 2 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
platelet-derived growth factor beta polypeptide; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 83B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 83A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U86 small nucleolar; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 43; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
synaptogyrin 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TGF-beta activated kinase 1/MAP3K7 binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC100506472; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mannosyl (beta-1,4-)-glycoprotein beta-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
mitochondrial elongation factor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
activating transcription factor 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein S19 binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
calcium channel, voltage-dependent, T type, alpha 1I subunit; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ENTH domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
mitochondrial fission regulator 2 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase, Rieske iron-sulfur polypeptide 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
GADS; GRAP-2; GRB2L; GRBLG; GrbX; Grf40; GRID; GRPL; Mona; P38
GRB2-related adaptor protein 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
family with sequence similarity 83, member F; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC100130899; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
trinucleotide repeat containing 6B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L7 pseudogene 52; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
adenylosuccinate lyase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small G protein signaling modulator 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
megakaryoblastic leukemia (translocation) 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
uncharacterized LOC101927257; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIb polypeptide 1 (ubiquitous) pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L4 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase pseudogene 37; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; peroxisomal membrane protein, 34kDa), member 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
riboflavin kinase pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
jumping translocation breakpoint pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 4766; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
AAG2; FAM10A1; FAM10A4; HIP; HOP; HSPABP; HSPABP1; P48; PRO0786; SNC6
suppression of tumorigenicity 13 (colon carcinoma) (Hsp70 interacting protein); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
X-prolyl aminopeptidase (aminopeptidase P) 3, putative; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ring-box 1, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein S9 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
actin, gamma 2, smooth muscle, enteric pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
E1A binding protein p300; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 1281; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC646927; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
l(3)mbt-like 2 (Drosophila); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chondroadherin-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Ran GTPase activating protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA mir-6889; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 7B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
thyrotrophic embryonic factor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transducer of ERBB2, 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
PHD finger protein 5A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
aconitase 2, mitochondrial; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide H (22.9kD); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cold shock domain containing C2, RNA binding; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphomannomutase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
D15Wsu75e; DeSI-1; DESI2; DJ347H13.4; FAM152B; PPPDE2
desumoylating isopeptidase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
15.5K; FA-1; FA1; NHPX; OTK27; SNRNP15-5; SNU13; SPAG12; SSFA1
NHP2 non-histone chromosome protein 2-like 1 (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
chromosome 22 open reading frame 46; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
meiosis inhibitor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 2 pseudogene10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
coiled-coil domain containing 134; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
hsa-mir-33; hsa-mir-33a; miR-33; MIR33; MIRN33; MIRN33A; miRNA33A
microRNA 33a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
shisa family member 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 378i; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BAFF-R; BAFFR; BROMIX; CD268; CVID4; prolixin
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 13C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
centromere protein M; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 634; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
septin 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
WBP2 N-terminal like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; adenine nucleotide translocator), member 5 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
N-acetylgalactosaminidase, alpha-; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
family with sequence similarity 109, member B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
single-pass membrane protein with aspartate-rich tail 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplex, 6, 14kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NDUFA6 antisense RNA 1 (head to head); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Obg-like ATPase 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CPD6; CYP2D; CYP2D7AP; CYP2D7BP; CYP2D7P2; CYP2D8P2; CYP2DL1; CYPIID6; P450-DB1; P450C2D; P450DB1
cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily D, polypeptide 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
CYP2D; CYP2D7; CYP2D7AP; CYP2D7P1; CYP2D@; P450C2D; P450DB1
cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily D, polypeptide 7, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily D, polypeptide 8, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
transcription factor 20 (AR1); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
opioid growth factor receptor pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NFAT activating protein with ITAM motif 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
serine hydrolase-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal RNA processing 7 homolog A (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
serine hydrolase-like 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal RNA processing 7 homolog B (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
polymerase (DNA-directed), delta interacting protein 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U12 small nuclear; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytochrome b5 reductase 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit G2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
A14GALT; A4GALT1; Gb3S; P(k); P1; P1PK; PK
alpha 1,4-galactosyltransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L5 pseudogene 34; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
golgin A2 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DNM1 pseudogene 18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 7 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase activating protein 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 1 homolog (S. cerevisiae) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family, member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein S25 pseudogene 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
BCL2-interacting killer (apoptosis-inducing); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
malonyl CoA:ACP acyltransferase (mitochondrial); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BPBS; BZRP; DBI; IBP; MBR; mDRC; PBR; PBS; pk18; PKBS; PTBR
translocator protein (18kDa); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family, member 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
signal peptide, CUB domain, EGF-like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
metallophosphoesterase domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
EFCAB6 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
EF-hand calcium binding domain 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
YWHAQ pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L4 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 2 pseudogene 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
BR-STL-1; BRSTL1; DJ388M5.3; hBR-STL-1; NST; SULTX3
sulfotransferase family 4A, member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CGI-51; OMP85; SAM50; TOB55; TRG-3; YNL026W
SAMM50 sorting and assembly machinery component; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L35a pseudogene 36; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
parvin, beta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
parvin, gamma; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
KIAA1644; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
uncharacterized LOC101927526; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S18C pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
leucine zipper, down-regulated in cancer 1-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
keratin 18 pseudogene 23; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 207; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 229; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
acidic (leucine-rich) nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family, member B pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
proline rich 5 (renal); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PRR5-ARHGAP8 readthrough; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Rho GTPase activating protein 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PHD finger protein 21B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L6 pseudogene 28; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC100506714; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
nucleoporin 50kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
KIAA0930; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 1249; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein S10 pseudogene 31; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uroplakin 3A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
family with sequence similarity 118, member A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
structural maintenance of chromosomes 1B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RIB43A domain with coiled-coils 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
fibulin 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ataxin 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 4762; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tRNA nucleotidyl transferase, CCA-adding, 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 7B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
dynein heavy chain -like pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 899; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 22 open reading frame 26; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC150381; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
MIRLET7B host gene (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3619; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA let-7a-3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 4763; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA let-7b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cysteine-rich, DPF motif domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
polycystin (PKD) family receptor for egg jelly; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 38; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
GTSE1 antisense RNA 1 (head to head); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
G-2 and S-phase expressed 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
tRNA 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate methyltransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cadherin, EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
GRAM domain containing 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ceramide kinase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TBC1 domain family, member 22A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
uncharacterized LOC101927722; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 898; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3201; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
family with sequence similarity 19 (chemokine (C-C motif)-like), member A5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC284933; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 4535; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC100128946; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L35 pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 3667; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 22 open reading frame 34; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L5 pseudogene 35; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
bromodomain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
uncharacterized protein BC001742; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger, BED-type containing 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ALG12, alpha-1,6-mannosyltransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domains 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
pim-3 oncogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA mir-6821; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
interleukin 17 receptor E-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy with subcortical cysts 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Mov10l1, Moloney leukemia virus 10-like 1, homolog (mouse); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
pannexin 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TraB domain containing; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
selenoprotein O; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
histone deacetylase 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ERK3; ERK6; P38GAMMA; PRKM12; SAPK-3; SAPK3
mitogen-activated protein kinase 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
p38-2; P38B; p38Beta; P38BETA2; PRKM11; SAPK2; SAPK2B
mitogen-activated protein kinase 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
plexin B2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DENN/MADD domain containing 6B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
SET binding factor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
adrenomedullin 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
myo-inositol oxygenase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
lipase maturation factor 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
non-SMC condensin II complex, subunit H2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
SCO2 cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ECGF; ECGF1; hPD-ECGF; MEDPS1; MNGIE; MTDPS1; PDECGF; TP
thymidine phosphorylase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 3B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
kelch domain containing 7B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
synaptonemal complex central element protein 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CHKB-CPT1B readthrough (NMD candidate); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CPT1-M; CPT1M; CPTI; CPTI-M; M-CPT1; MCCPT1; MCPT1
carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1B (muscle); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CHETK; CHKL; CK; CKB; CKEKB; EK; EKB; MDCMC
choline kinase beta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CHKB antisense RNA 1 (head to head); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 interacting protein 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
arylsulfatase A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DEL22q13.3; PROSAP2; PSAP2; SCZD15; SPANK-2
SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
acrosin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide A' pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L23a pseudogene 82; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Linear centromere model derived predominantly from reads generated in PMID: 17803354. This region does not represent an actual centromere sequence, as long-range ordering of repeats and unmapped WGS contigs is not provided by the model. For details of model production, see http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.0035.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723780, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723780, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723780, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 3% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 46% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
olfactory receptor, family 11, subfamily H, member 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 35% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 Proteins, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 8 (theta)-like 2
putative T-complex protein 1 subunit theta-like 2
transmembrane phosphatase with tensin homology pseudogene 1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_001591.1
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ANKRD62P1-PARP4P3 readthrough, transcribed pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
XK, Kell blood group complex subunit-related family, member 3
heat shock transcription factor, Y-linked 1 pseudogene 1
GRB2-associated binding protein family, member 4
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 7 (non-protein coding)
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 6, transcript variant 2
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 6, transcript variant 1
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cat eye syndrome critical region protein 6 isoform a
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cat eye syndrome critical region protein 6 isoform b
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 118 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 106 ESTs, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 5, transcript variant 1
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 5, transcript variant 2
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cat eye syndrome critical region protein 5 isoform 1
isoform 2 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cat eye syndrome critical region protein 5 isoform 2 precursor
cat eye syndrome critical region protein 5 isoform X2
cat eye syndrome critical region protein 5 isoform X3
CECR5 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
CECR5 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 1, transcript variant 5
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 1, transcript variant 7
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 1, transcript variant 6
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 1, transcript variant 4
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 1, transcript variant 3
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 1, transcript variant 2
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 19 ESTs, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform a precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
adenosine deaminase CECR1 isoform a precursor
isoform a precursor is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 3 (non-protein coding)
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 17 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 2
cat eye syndrome critical region protein 2
cat eye syndrome critical region protein 2 isoform X1
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 2, transcript variant X2
cat eye syndrome critical region protein 2 isoform X2
cat eye syndrome chromosome region, candidate 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 28 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cat eye syndrome critical region protein 2 isoform X3
solute carrier family 25 (glutamate carrier), member 18
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_031481.1
ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal 31kDa, V1 subunit E1, transcript variant 2
ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal 31kDa, V1 subunit E1, transcript variant 3
ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal 31kDa, V1 subunit E1, transcript variant 1
V-type proton ATPase subunit E 1 isoform b
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
V-type proton ATPase subunit E 1 isoform c
V-type proton ATPase subunit E 1 isoform a
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 159 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 1
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 7
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 10
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 5
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 8
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 11
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 4
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 2
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 3
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 6
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 168 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 195 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 12
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 13
isoform h is encoded by transcript variant 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform f is encoded by transcript variant 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform i is encoded by transcript variant 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform e is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform e is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform e is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator), transcript variant 9
isoform g is encoded by transcript variant 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BH3 interacting domain death agonist, transcript variant 4
BH3 interacting domain death agonist, transcript variant 6
BH3 interacting domain death agonist, transcript variant 3
BH3 interacting domain death agonist, transcript variant 5
BH3 interacting domain death agonist, transcript variant 2
BH3 interacting domain death agonist, transcript variant 7
BH3 interacting domain death agonist, transcript variant 1
BH3-interacting domain death agonist isoform 1
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BH3-interacting domain death agonist isoform 2
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BH3-interacting domain death agonist isoform 3
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 528
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant 1
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 256 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 253 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 253 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 254 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 256 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 253 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 256 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 253 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 254 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 257 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 243 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform 1
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform X6
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform X14
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform X10
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform X12
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform X13
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform X7
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform X11
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform X9
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform X8
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform X15
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant 3
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform 3
microtubule associated monooxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 3, transcript variant 2
protein-methionine sulfoxide oxidase MICAL3 isoform 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 26, transcript variant 1
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 26, transcript variant 3
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 26, transcript variant 2
peroxisome assembly protein 26 isoform a
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
peroxisome assembly protein 26 isoform b
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase 18, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubl carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 18 isoform X1
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388882-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388882-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388882-like, transcript variant X2
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388882-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388882-like, transcript variant X5
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388882-like isoform X1
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388882-like isoform X2
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388882-like isoform X3
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388882-like isoform X4
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388882-like isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 12% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
family with sequence similarity 230, member A
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, catalytic, alpha pseudogene 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
immunoglobulin superfamily member 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 6
proline dehydrogenase (oxidase) 1, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_016335.4
proline dehydrogenase (oxidase) 1, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001195226.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_057419.4
isoform 1 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proline dehydrogenase 1, mitochondrial isoform 1 precursor
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001182155.1
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proline dehydrogenase 1, mitochondrial isoform 2
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 5 (non-protein coding), transcript variant 1
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 5 (non-protein coding), transcript variant 2
cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 1-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 6% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC100506454, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100506454, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100506454, transcript variant X3
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 9
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 10 (non-protein coding)
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 2, transcript variant 3
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 2, transcript variant 2
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 2, transcript variant 5
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 2, transcript variant 4
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 2, transcript variant 1
isoform 3 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
integral membrane protein DGCR2/IDD isoform 3 precursor
integral membrane protein DGCR2/IDD isoform 2 precursor
isoform 4 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
integral membrane protein DGCR2/IDD isoform 4 precursor
isoform 1 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
integral membrane protein DGCR2/IDD isoform 1 precursor
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 11 (non-protein coding)
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 14
testis-specific serine/threonine-protein kinase 2
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 14, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 64 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 14, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 14, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 14, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; citrate transporter), member 1, transcript variant 4
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; citrate transporter), member 1, transcript variant 1
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; citrate transporter), member 1, transcript variant 2
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; citrate transporter), member 1, transcript variant 3
isoform a precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tricarboxylate transport protein, mitochondrial isoform a precursor
tricarboxylate transport protein, mitochondrial isoform b
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tricarboxylate transport protein, mitochondrial isoform c
clathrin, heavy chain-like 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 46 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
clathrin, heavy chain-like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 49 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
clathrin, heavy chain-like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 50 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
clathrin, heavy chain-like 1, transcript variant 2
clathrin, heavy chain-like 1, transcript variant 1
clathrin, heavy chain-like 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 30 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
clathrin, heavy chain-like 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
clathrin, heavy chain-like 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 32 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L40, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 107 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
39S ribosomal protein L40, mitochondrial
39S ribosomal protein L40, mitochondrial isoform X1
chromosome 22 open reading frame 39, transcript variant 2
chromosome 22 open reading frame 39, transcript variant 1
ubiquitin fusion degradation 1 like (yeast), transcript variant 2
ubiquitin fusion degradation 1 like (yeast), transcript variant 1
ubiquitin fusion degradation 1 like (yeast), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 126 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin fusion degradation 1 like (yeast), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 127 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin fusion degradation 1 like (yeast), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 42 ESTs, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin fusion degradation protein 1 homolog isoform A
ubiquitin fusion degradation protein 1 homolog isoform X2
ubiquitin fusion degradation protein 1 homolog isoform X3
ubiquitin fusion degradation protein 1 homolog isoform B
ubiquitin fusion degradation protein 1 homolog isoform X1
cell division cycle 45, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 79 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cell division cycle 45, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 73 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell division cycle 45, transcript variant 1
cell division cycle 45, transcript variant 2
cell division cycle 45, transcript variant 3
cell division control protein 45 homolog isoform 1
cell division control protein 45 homolog isoform X1
cell division control protein 45 homolog isoform X2
cell division control protein 45 homolog isoform 2
cell division control protein 45 homolog isoform 3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 214 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 895
SEPT5-GP1BB readthrough, transcript variant 1
SEPT5-GP1BB readthrough, transcript variant 2
glycoprotein Ib (platelet), beta polypeptide
platelet glycoprotein Ib beta chain precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
T-box transcription factor TBX1 isoform X1
isoform B is encoded by transcript variant B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
T-box transcription factor TBX1 isoform B
isoform A is encoded by transcript variant A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
T-box transcription factor TBX1 isoform A
isoform C is encoded by transcript variant C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
T-box transcription factor TBX1 isoform C
T-box transcription factor TBX1 isoform X2
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), beta polypeptide 1-like
guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit beta-like protein 1
thioredoxin reductase 2, transcript variant 1
thioredoxin reductase 2, mitochondrial isoform 1 precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
thioredoxin reductase 2, transcript variant 2
thioredoxin reductase 2, mitochondrial isoform 2 precursor
catechol-O-methyltransferase, transcript variant 1
catechol-O-methyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 247 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
catechol-O-methyltransferase, transcript variant 2
catechol-O-methyltransferase, transcript variant 3
isoform MB-COMT is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
catechol O-methyltransferase isoform MB-COMT
isoform MB-COMT is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform MB-COMT is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
catechol-O-methyltransferase, transcript variant 4
isoform S-COMT is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
catechol O-methyltransferase isoform S-COMT
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 29 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome isoform X1
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome isoform X5
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome isoform X4
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome isoform X7
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 65 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 69 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 59 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 70 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome isoform X3
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome isoform X6
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome isoform X2
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome isoform X9
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome isoform X8
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
armadillo repeat gene deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome, transcript variant X11
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome isoform X12
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome isoform X11
armadillo repeat protein deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome isoform X10
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 1
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 7
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 2
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 6
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 9
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 50 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 4
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 49 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 10
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 3
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 5
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 11
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 13
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 8
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 12
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transport and golgi organization 2 homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant 14
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform a
isoform e is encoded by transcript variant 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform e
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform X5
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform d
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform c
isoform h is encoded by transcript variant 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform h
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform b
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform X4
isoform f is encoded by transcript variant 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform f
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform X16
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform X13
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform X12
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform X15
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform X11
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform X14
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform X10
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform X9
isoform g is encoded by transcript variant 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transport and Golgi organization protein 2 homolog isoform g
DGCR8 microprocessor complex subunit, transcript variant 1
DGCR8 microprocessor complex subunit, transcript variant 2
microprocessor complex subunit DGCR8 isoform 1
microprocessor complex subunit DGCR8 isoform 2
DGCR8 microprocessor complex subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 102 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
microprocessor complex subunit DGCR8 isoform X1
tRNA methyltransferase 2 homolog A (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 2
tRNA methyltransferase 2 homolog A (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 1
tRNA methyltransferase 2 homolog A (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 3
tRNA methyltransferase 2 homolog A (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 241 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA (uracil-5-)-methyltransferase homolog A isoform X1
tRNA (uracil-5-)-methyltransferase homolog A isoform a
tRNA (uracil-5-)-methyltransferase homolog A isoform b
RAN binding protein 1, transcript variant 1
ran-specific GTPase-activating protein isoform 1
RAN binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 92 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAN binding protein 1, transcript variant 2
RAN binding protein 1, transcript variant 3
ran-specific GTPase-activating protein isoform 2
ran-specific GTPase-activating protein isoform 3
ran-specific GTPase-activating protein isoform X1
RAN binding protein 1, transcript variant 4
RAN binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform 4 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ran-specific GTPase-activating protein isoform 4
ran-specific GTPase-activating protein isoform X2
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 8, transcript variant 2
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 8, transcript variant 1
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
probable palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC8 isoform 1
probable palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC8 isoform X1
probable palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC8 isoform 2
uncharacterized LOC388849, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC388849, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC388849, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC388849, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein LOC388849 isoform X4
uncharacterized protein LOC388849 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein LOC388849 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein LOC388849 isoform X3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_038460.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 896
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 6-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 12 Proteins, and 40% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred complete CDS: substituted 1 base at 1 genomic stop codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: uncharacterized protein LOC101927859
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
putative ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 41
zinc finger protein 74, transcript variant 5
zinc finger protein 74, transcript variant 1
zinc finger protein 74, transcript variant 2
zinc finger protein 74, transcript variant 3
zinc finger protein 74, transcript variant 4
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
scavenger receptor class F, member 2, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_182895.3
The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions and 3 indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
scavenger receptor class F, member 2, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_153334.5
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_878315.1
isoform 2 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions and 3 indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
scavenger receptor class F member 2 isoform 2 precursor
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_699165.2
isoform 1 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions and 3 indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
scavenger receptor class F member 2 isoform 1 precursor
scavenger receptor class F, member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
scavenger receptor class F member 2 isoform X1
kelch-like family member 22, transcript variant 2
kelch-like family member 22, transcript variant 1
kelch-like family member 22, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 157 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch-like family member 22, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 157 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator complex subunit 15, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 236 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator complex subunit 15, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 227 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator complex subunit 15, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 237 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator complex subunit 15, transcript variant 1
mediator complex subunit 15, transcript variant 2
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 15 isoform a
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 15 isoform b
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 15 isoform X7
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 15 isoform X4
mediator complex subunit 15, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 230 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator complex subunit 15, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 240 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 15 isoform X5
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 15 isoform X6
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 15 isoform X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 4 pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, catalytic, alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 259 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, catalytic, alpha, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 210 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, catalytic, alpha, transcript variant 1
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, catalytic, alpha, transcript variant 2
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alpha isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alpha isoform X2
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alpha isoform 1
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alpha isoform 2
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade D (heparin cofactor), member 1
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade D (heparin cofactor), member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 37 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
v-crk avian sarcoma virus CT10 oncogene homolog-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
apoptosis-inducing factor, mitochondrion-associated, 3, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_144704.2
apoptosis-inducing factor, mitochondrion-associated, 3, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001018060.2
apoptosis-inducing factor, mitochondrion-associated, 3, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001146288.1
apoptosis-inducing factor, mitochondrion-associated, 3, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_027464.1
leucine-zipper-like transcription regulator 1
leucine-zipper-like transcriptional regulator 1
THAP domain containing 7, transcript variant 2
THAP domain containing 7, transcript variant 1
THAP7 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
THAP7 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel, 6, transcript variant 2
purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel, 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel, 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel, 6, transcript variant 1
purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel, 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 7, member 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 7, member 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 20 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 7, member 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
cationic amino acid transporter 4 isoform X1
cationic amino acid transporter 4 isoform X2
cationic amino acid transporter 4 isoform X3
purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel, 6 pseudogene
chromosome 14 open reading frame 166B pseudogene
family with sequence similarity 230, member B (non-protein coding)
gamma-glutamyltransferase 2, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase 2, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 11 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
gamma-glutamyltransferase 2, transcript variant X10
gamma-glutamyltransferase 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase 2, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase 2, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase 2 isoform X15
gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase 2 isoform X11
gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase 2 isoform X10
gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase 2 isoform X12
gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase 2 isoform X13
gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase 2 isoform X7
gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase 2 isoform X9
gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase 2 isoform X14
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 8 pseudogene
high mobility group nucleosome-binding domain-containing protein 5-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group nucleosome-binding domain-containing protein 5-like, transcript variant X4
high mobility group nucleosome-binding domain-containing protein 5-like, transcript variant X2
high mobility group nucleosome-binding domain-containing protein 5-like, transcript variant X3
high mobility group nucleosome-binding domain-containing protein 5-like isoform X2
high mobility group nucleosome-binding domain-containing protein 5-like isoform X3
high mobility group nucleosome-binding domain-containing protein 5-like isoform X4
high mobility group nucleosome-binding domain-containing protein 5-like isoform X1
hypermethylated in cancer 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 95 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
hypermethylated in cancer 2 protein isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, catalytic, alpha pseudogene 2
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_003700.1
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2L 3, transcript variant 4
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 L3 isoform 4
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2L 3, transcript variant 2
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2L 3, transcript variant 1
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2L 3, transcript variant 3
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2L 3, transcript variant 5
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 L3 isoform 1
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 L3 isoform 3
YdjC homolog (bacterial), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 53 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
YdjC homolog (bacterial), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 67 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 116, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 116 isoform X1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 116
coiled-coil domain containing 116, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 116 isoform X2
stromal cell-derived factor 2-like protein 1 precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
peptidylprolyl isomerase (cyclophilin)-like 2, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_014337.3
peptidylprolyl isomerase (cyclophilin)-like 2, transcript variant 2
peptidylprolyl isomerase (cyclophilin)-like 2, transcript variant 3
peptidylprolyl isomerase (cyclophilin)-like 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 363 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
peptidylprolyl isomerase (cyclophilin)-like 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 370 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
peptidylprolyl isomerase (cyclophilin)-like 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 349 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
peptidylprolyl isomerase (cyclophilin)-like 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 202 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase-like 2 isoform b
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase-like 2 isoform X2
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase-like 2 isoform X3
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase-like 2 isoform X4
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase-like 2 isoform a
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase-like 2 isoform X5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_013313.3
yippee-like 1 (Drosophila), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 126 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
yippee-like 1 (Drosophila), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 126 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase 1, transcript variant 1
mitogen-activated protein kinase 1, transcript variant 2
protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent, 1F
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta, transcript variant 3
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta, transcript variant 2
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta, transcript variant 1
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 78 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 85 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 78 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 145 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 98 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
topoisomerase (DNA) III beta, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_007128.2
immunoglobulin iota chain; CD179a; v(pre)B protein; CD179 antigen-like family member A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_027293.1
BMS1 pseudogene 20, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
stop codon may be deleted or mutated during V-J recombination; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_080764.2
zinc finger protein 280B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_542942.1
zinc finger protein 279; zinc finger protein 632; suppressor of hairy wing homolog 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_080740.3
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_542778.1
zinc finger protein 280; zinc finger protein 636; suppressor of hairy wing homolog 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_206954.1
preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_006115.3
preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_206953.1
preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma, transcript variant 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_206956.1
preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_206955.1
Opa-interacting protein OIP4; cancer/testis antigen 130; opa-interacting protein 4; preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
melanoma antigen preferentially expressed in tumors
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_027426.1
The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 1, pseudogene
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_024591.1
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2 isoform X5
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2 isoform X6
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2 isoform X1
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2 isoform X4
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2, transcript variant 1
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2 isoform X3
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2 isoform X7
gamma-glutamyltransferase-like 4; gamma-glutamyltransferase-like protein 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2 isoform 1
gamma-glutamyltransferase light chain 2 isoform X8
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 5, transcript variant 1
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 5, transcript variant 2
immunoglobulin lambda-3 surrogate light chain; omega light chain protein 14.1; G lambda-1; germline immunoglobulin lambda 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 5 isoform 1
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 5 isoform 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
rhabdoid tumor deletion region protein 1
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), alpha z polypeptide
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_002073.2
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(z) subunit alpha
RAB36, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB36, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB36, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
breakpoint cluster region, transcript variant 1
breakpoint cluster region, transcript variant 2
breakpoint cluster region protein isoform 1
breakpoint cluster region protein isoform 2
F-box and WD repeat domain containing 4 pseudogene 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 8 pseudogene 1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_003950.1
uncharacterized LOC101929374, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC101929374, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC101929374, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
prostate cancer associated transcript 14 (non-protein coding)
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 1, transcript variant 2
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 1, transcript variant 1
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 1 isoform a precursor
isoform b precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 1 isoform b precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 43, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C22orf43 isoform X2
chromosome 22 open reading frame 43, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 43, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 43, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C22orf43 isoform X1
ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_021916.2
chromosome 22 open reading frame 15, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 15, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 15, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 15, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C22orf15 isoform X6
uncharacterized protein C22orf15 isoform X10
uncharacterized protein C22orf15 isoform X9
uncharacterized protein C22orf15 isoform X12
chromosome 22 open reading frame 15, transcript variant X11
chromosome 22 open reading frame 15, transcript variant X13
uncharacterized protein C22orf15 isoform X11
uncharacterized protein C22orf15 isoform X13
chromosome 22 open reading frame 15, transcript variant X14
uncharacterized protein C22orf15 isoform X14
coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain containing 10, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain containing 10
coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain-containing protein 10, mitochondrial precursor
coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain-containing protein 10, mitochondrial isoform X1
matrix metallopeptidase 11 (stromelysin 3)
stromelysin-3 preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily b, member 1, transcript variant 1
SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily b, member 1, transcript variant 2
SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily B member 1 isoform a
SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily B member 1 isoform b
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 11, transcript variant 1
solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 11, transcript variant 3
solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 11, transcript variant 5
solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 11, transcript variant 6
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 11 isoform c
solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 11, transcript variant 4
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 11 isoform d
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 11 isoform a
solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 11, transcript variant 2
solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 11 isoform b
macrophage migration inhibitory factor (glycosylation-inhibiting factor)
glutathione S-transferase theta 2B (gene/pseudogene), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
glutathione S-transferase theta 2B (gene/pseudogene)
glutathione S-transferase theta-2B isoform X1
D-dopachrome tautomerase, transcript variant 1
D-dopachrome tautomerase, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_000854.3
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_000845.1
The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glutathione S-transferase theta pseudogene 1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_003081.1
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 114 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant 2
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant 3
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant 1
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 113 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 108 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 106 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 122 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 120 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 120 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 117 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 125 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin binding protein 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform X1
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform X7
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform X6
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform X2
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform X3
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform a
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform X9
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform X8
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform X10
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform b
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform X5
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform X11
calcineurin-binding protein cabin-1 isoform X12
sushi domain-containing protein 2 precursor
gamma-glutamyltransferase 5, transcript variant 3
gamma-glutamyltransferase 5, transcript variant 2
gamma-glutamyltransferase 5, transcript variant 1
gamma-glutamyltransferase 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 215 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 230 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamyltransferase 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 228 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 9, pseudogene
SPECC1L-ADORA2A readthrough (NMD candidate)
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_103546.1
sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1-like, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_015330.4
sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1-like, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001145468.3
sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1-like, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001254732.2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001138940.3
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_056145.4
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001241661.2
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 3; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1-like, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001254733.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001241662.1
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 4; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
adenosine A2a receptor, transcript variant 5
adenosine A2a receptor, transcript variant 3
adenosine A2a receptor, transcript variant 6
adenosine A2a receptor, transcript variant 4
adenosine A2a receptor, transcript variant 7
ADORA2A antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_028484.1
adenosine A2a receptor, transcript variant 1
adenosine A2a receptor, transcript variant 2
ADORA2A antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
ureidopropionase, beta, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ureidopropionase, beta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanylyl cyclase domain containing 1, transcript variant 9
guanylyl cyclase domain containing 1, transcript variant 3
guanylyl cyclase domain containing 1, transcript variant 2
guanylyl cyclase domain containing 1, transcript variant 1
guanylyl cyclase domain containing 1, transcript variant 8
guanylyl cyclase domain containing 1, transcript variant 7
guanylyl cyclase domain containing 1, transcript variant 6
guanylyl cyclase domain containing 1, transcript variant 5
guanylyl cyclase domain containing 1, transcript variant 4
guanylyl cyclase domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 258 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform f is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform h is encoded by transcript variant 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform g is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein D3 polypeptide 18kDa, transcript variant 1
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein D3 polypeptide 18kDa, transcript variant 3
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein D3 polypeptide 18kDa, transcript variant 2
gamma-glutamyltransferase 1, transcript variant 3
family with sequence similarity 211, member B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 45 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 211, member B
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein FAM211B
family with sequence similarity 211, member B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein FAM211B isoform X1
gamma-glutamyltransferase 1, transcript variant 6
gamma-glutamyltransferase 1, transcript variant 2
gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase 1 precursor
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 10, pseudogene
piwi-like RNA-mediated gene silencing 3, transcript variant 2
piwi-like RNA-mediated gene silencing 3, transcript variant 1
piwi-like RNA-mediated gene silencing 3, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_045649.1
piwi-like RNA-mediated gene silencing 3, transcript variant 3
small G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001039948.2
small G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_133454.2
small G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001098497.1
small G protein signaling modulator 1, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001098498.1
small G protein signaling modulator 1 isoform 1
small G protein signaling modulator 1 isoform 2
small G protein signaling modulator 1 isoform 3
small G protein signaling modulator 1 isoform 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 134 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 135 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein KIAA1671 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein KIAA1671 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein KIAA1671 isoform X3
crystallin, beta B2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 238 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 3, pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5-like, transcript variant 2
low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5-like, transcript variant 1
low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5-like protein isoform X1
low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5-like protein
low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
crystallin, beta B2 pseudogene 1, transcript variant 1
crystallin, beta B2 pseudogene 1, transcript variant 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
adrenergic, beta, receptor kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 169 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 24 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 24 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
seizure related 6 homolog (mouse)-like, transcript variant 1
seizure related 6 homolog (mouse)-like, transcript variant 2
seizure related 6 homolog (mouse)-like, transcript variant 3
seizure related 6 homolog (mouse)-like, transcript variant 4
seizure related 6 homolog (mouse)-like, transcript variant 6
seizure related 6 homolog (mouse)-like, transcript variant 5
seizure related 6 homolog (mouse)-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 92 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
seizure related 6 homolog (mouse)-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 97 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
seizure related 6 homolog (mouse)-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 90 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
seizure related 6 homolog (mouse)-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 88 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
seizure 6-like protein isoform 1 precursor
seizure 6-like protein isoform 2 precursor
seizure 6-like protein isoform 3 precursor
seizure 6-like protein isoform 4 precursor
isoform 6 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
seizure 6-like protein isoform 6 precursor
isoform 5 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
seizure 6-like protein isoform 5 precursor
aspartate beta-hydroxylase domain containing 2
aspartate beta-hydroxylase domain-containing protein 2
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 114 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform X5
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant 5
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant 1
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant 2
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant 6
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 183 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 200 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 226 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 255 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 194 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 196 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 141 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 140 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 141 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform X6
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform a
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform X1
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform X2
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform X3
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform b
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform X7
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform X10
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform X8
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform X9
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform X11
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 114 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 4 protein isoform X4
tuftelin interacting protein 11, transcript variant 2
tuftelin interacting protein 11, transcript variant 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase 2, transcript variant 2
tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase 2, transcript variant 1
tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 88 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein-tyrosine sulfotransferase 2 isoform X1
protein-tyrosine sulfotransferase 2 precursor
crystallin, beta A4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 89 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
myocardial infarction associated transcript (non-protein coding), transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_003491.2
The RefSeq transcript has 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
myocardial infarction associated transcript (non-protein coding), transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_033319.1
myocardial infarction associated transcript (non-protein coding), transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_033320.1
myocardial infarction associated transcript (non-protein coding), transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_033321.1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101929539, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC101929539, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, and 14% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
meningioma (disrupted in balanced translocation) 1
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein, beta, transcript variant sp2
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein, beta, transcript variant sp1
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein, beta, transcript variant sp3
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant sp2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein beta isoform isoform 2
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant sp1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein beta isoform isoform 1
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant sp3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein beta isoform isoform 3
TTC28 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
TTC28 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 28, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 131 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 28, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 129 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 28 isoform X1
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 28 isoform X2
checkpoint kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
checkpoint kinase 2, transcript variant 2
checkpoint kinase 2, transcript variant 1
checkpoint kinase 2, transcript variant 4
checkpoint kinase 2, transcript variant 3
checkpoint kinase 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
checkpoint kinase 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase Chk2 isoform b
serine/threonine-protein kinase Chk2 isoform a
serine/threonine-protein kinase Chk2 isoform c
serine/threonine-protein kinase Chk2 isoform d
serine/threonine-protein kinase Chk2 isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase Chk2 isoform X4
checkpoint kinase 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase Chk2 isoform X3
HscB mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster co-chaperone, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
HscB mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster co-chaperone, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
HscB mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster co-chaperone
iron-sulfur cluster co-chaperone protein HscB, mitochondrial precursor
iron-sulfur cluster co-chaperone protein HscB, mitochondrial isoform X2
iron-sulfur cluster co-chaperone protein HscB, mitochondrial isoform X3
HscB mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster co-chaperone, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
iron-sulfur cluster co-chaperone protein HscB, mitochondrial isoform X1
coiled-coil domain containing 117, transcript variant 1
coiled-coil domain containing 117, transcript variant 3
coiled-coil domain containing 117, transcript variant 2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 117 isoform a
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 117 isoform c
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 117 isoform b
coiled-coil domain containing 117, transcript variant 4
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 117 isoform d
X-box binding protein 1, transcript variant 2
X-box binding protein 1, transcript variant 1
isoform XBP1(S) is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform XBP1(U) is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc and ring finger 3, transcript variant 1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase ZNRF3 isoform 1 precursor
zinc and ring finger 3, transcript variant 2
zinc and ring finger 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 57 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase ZNRF3 isoform 2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase ZNRF3 isoform X1
zinc and ring finger 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 55 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc and ring finger 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 55 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase ZNRF3 isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase ZNRF3 isoform X3
chromosome 22 open reading frame 31, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 31, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized protein C22orf31 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein C22orf31 isoform X2
kringle containing transmembrane protein 1, transcript variant 2
kringle containing transmembrane protein 1, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001039570.2
uncharacterized LOC101929638, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101929638, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101929638, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC101929638, transcript variant X1
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant 1
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant 2
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 31 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 28 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 27 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform 1 precursor
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X8
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform 2 precursor
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X6
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 27 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
EMI domain containing 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 27 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X9
EMI domain-containing protein 1 isoform X10
rhomboid domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 80 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
rhomboid domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 88 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
rhomboid domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
rhomboid domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
EWS RNA-binding protein 1, transcript variant 1
EWS RNA-binding protein 1, transcript variant 2
EWS RNA-binding protein 1, transcript variant 3
EWS RNA-binding protein 1, transcript variant 4
EWS RNA-binding protein 1, transcript variant 5
EWS RNA-binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 229 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
EWS RNA-binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1055 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
EWS RNA-binding protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1040 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
EWS RNA-binding protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1041 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
EWS RNA-binding protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 983 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform 5 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
growth arrest-specific 2 like 1, transcript variant 2
growth arrest-specific 2 like 1, transcript variant 1
growth arrest-specific 2 like 1, transcript variant 4
ras-like protein family member 10A precursor
adaptor-related protein complex 1, beta 1 subunit, transcript variant 3
adaptor-related protein complex 1, beta 1 subunit, transcript variant 2
adaptor-related protein complex 1, beta 1 subunit, transcript variant 1
neurofilament, heavy polypeptide, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 78 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
neurofilament, heavy polypeptide, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
neurofilament heavy polypeptide isoform X1
neurofilament heavy polypeptide isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 212 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 168 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 93 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 92 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 64 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 62 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
THO complex subunit 5 homolog isoform X1
THO complex subunit 5 homolog isoform X2
THO complex subunit 5 homolog isoform X3
THO complex subunit 5 homolog isoform X7
THO complex subunit 5 homolog isoform X4
THO complex subunit 5 homolog isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 156 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 148 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
nipsnap homolog 1 (C. elegans), transcript variant 1
nipsnap homolog 1 (C. elegans), transcript variant 2
nipsnap homolog 1 (C. elegans), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 223 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
neurofibromin 2 (merlin), transcript variant 8
neurofibromin 2 (merlin), transcript variant 2
neurofibromin 2 (merlin), transcript variant 1
neurofibromin 2 (merlin), transcript variant 9
neurofibromin 2 (merlin), transcript variant 6
neurofibromin 2 (merlin), transcript variant 5
neurofibromin 2 (merlin), transcript variant 7
neurofibromin 2 (merlin), transcript variant 12
neurofibromin 2 (merlin), transcript variant 13
isoform 8 is encoded by transcript variant 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 6 is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 7 is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 7 is encoded by transcript variant 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
calcium binding protein 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, matrin-type 5, transcript variant 2
zinc finger, matrin-type 5, transcript variant 1
zinc finger, matrin-type 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 99 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger matrin-type protein 5 isoform X1
ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase, complex III subunit X, transcript variant 2
ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase, complex III subunit X, transcript variant 1
cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 9 isoform a
cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 9 isoform b
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant 2
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant 1
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 143 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 192 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 147 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 143 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 139 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 142 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 145 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 141 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 142 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform 2
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform X3
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform X4
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform 1
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform X1
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform X2
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform X6
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform X5
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform X7
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform X8
activating signal cointegrator 1 complex subunit 2 isoform X9
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 230 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant 3
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant 1
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant 2
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 232 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 244 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 229 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 235 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 237 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform X4
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform c
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform a
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform b
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform X1
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform X2
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform X3
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform X5
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform X6
myotubularin related protein 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 228 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 3 isoform X7
uncharacterized LOC101929664, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101929664, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC101929664, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
HORMA domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
HORMA domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
HORMA domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
HORMA domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
leukemia inhibitory factor, transcript variant 2
leukemia inhibitory factor, transcript variant 1
leukemia inhibitory factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 27 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
leukemia inhibitory factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
leukemia inhibitory factor isoform 1 precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
oncostatin-M preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TBC1 domain family, member 10A, transcript variant 2
TBC1 domain family, member 10A, transcript variant 1
splicing factor 3a, subunit 1, 120kDa, transcript variant 2
splicing factor 3a, subunit 1, 120kDa, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001017437.2
coiled-coil domain containing 157, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 157, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 157, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 157 isoform X1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001017437.2
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 157
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 157 isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 157 isoform X3
SEC14-like 2 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_012429.3
SEC14-like 2 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001204204.1
SEC14-like 2 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 2
mitochondrial fission process 1, transcript variant 1
mitochondrial fission process 1, transcript variant 2
mitochondrial fission process protein 1 isoform b
mitochondrial fission process protein 1 isoform a
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SEC14-like 3 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SEC14-like 3 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 1
SEC14-like 3 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 3
SEC14-like 3 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 2
SEC14-like 3 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 4
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SEC14-like 4 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC14-like 4 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC14-like 4 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC14-like 4 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC14-like 4 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC14-like 4 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X4
SEC14-like 4 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 2
SEC14-like 4 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 1
SEC14-like 6 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SEC14-like 6 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SEC14-like 6 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEC14-like 6 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative SEC14-like protein 6 isoform X5
putative SEC14-like protein 6 isoform X3
putative SEC14-like protein 6 isoform X1
putative SEC14-like protein 6 isoform X2
SEC14-like 6 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X4
putative SEC14-like protein 6 isoform X4
galactose-3-O-sulfotransferase 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
galactose-3-O-sulfotransferase 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
galactose-3-O-sulfotransferase 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
galactosylceramide sulfotransferase isoform X12
galactosylceramide sulfotransferase isoform X15
galactosylceramide sulfotransferase isoform X7
pescadillo ribosomal biogenesis factor 1, transcript variant 2
pescadillo ribosomal biogenesis factor 1, transcript variant 4
pescadillo ribosomal biogenesis factor 1, transcript variant 3
pescadillo ribosomal biogenesis factor 1, transcript variant 1
pescadillo ribosomal biogenesis factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 494 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_152511.3
dual specificity phosphatase 18, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 58 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 18, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 40 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 18, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 43 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity phosphatase 18, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 37 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
dual specificity protein phosphatase 18 isoform X2
dual specificity protein phosphatase 18 isoform X3
dual specificity protein phosphatase 18 isoform X4
dual specificity protein phosphatase 18 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant 3
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 88 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 89 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant 1
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant 4
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 71 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant X7
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant 5
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 92 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant 6
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant 7
oxysterol binding protein 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 94 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
MORC family CW-type zinc finger 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 80 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_014941.1
MORC family CW-type zinc finger protein 2 isoform X2
MORC family CW-type zinc finger protein 2 isoform X1
MORC family CW-type zinc finger protein 2
taurine up-regulated 1 (non-protein coding)
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_002323.1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 154 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 282 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 590 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 542 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 569 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 528 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 576 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 524 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 517 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 566 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 52 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase J, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 41 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase J, transcript variant 2
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase J, transcript variant 6
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase J, transcript variant 1
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase J, transcript variant 5
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase J, transcript variant 3
inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase J, transcript variant 4
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase A isoform X1
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase A isoform a
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase A isoform c
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase A isoform b
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase A isoform e
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase A isoform d
group 3 secretory phospholipase A2 precursor
ring finger protein 185, transcript variant 4
ring finger protein 185, transcript variant 5
ring finger protein 185, transcript variant 1
ring finger protein 185, transcript variant 6
ring finger protein 185, transcript variant 3
ring finger protein 185, transcript variant 7
ring finger protein 185, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 204 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 185, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 199 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF185 isoform 1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF185 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF185 isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF185 isoform 2
LIM domain kinase 2, transcript variant 2a
isoform 2a is encoded by transcript variant 2a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
LIM domain kinase 2, transcript variant 2b
LIM domain kinase 2, transcript variant 1
isoform 2b is encoded by transcript variant 2b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphoinositide-3-kinase interacting protein 1, transcript variant 2
phosphoinositide-3-kinase interacting protein 1, transcript variant 1
phosphoinositide-3-kinase-interacting protein 1 isoform 1 precursor
phosphoinositide-3-kinase-interacting protein 1 isoform 2 precursor
POZ (BTB) and AT hook containing zinc finger 1, transcript variant 2
POZ (BTB) and AT hook containing zinc finger 1, transcript variant 3
POZ (BTB) and AT hook containing zinc finger 1, transcript variant 1
long A isoform is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
POZ-, AT hook-, and zinc finger-containing protein 1 long A isoform
long C isoform is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
POZ-, AT hook-, and zinc finger-containing protein 1 long C isoform
uncharacterized LOC101929760, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101929760, transcript variant X3
long B isoform is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
POZ-, AT hook-, and zinc finger-containing protein 1 long B isoform
uncharacterized LOC101929760, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
POZ (BTB) and AT hook containing zinc finger 1, transcript variant 4
short isoform is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
POZ-, AT hook-, and zinc finger-containing protein 1 short isoform
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
developmentally regulated GTP binding protein 1
developmentally-regulated GTP-binding protein 1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant 3
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant 1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant 2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 109 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 131 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 110 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 105 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 94 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 92 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 107 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E transporter isoform X7
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E transporter isoform X6
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E transporter isoform X5
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E transporter isoform X4
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E transporter isoform b
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E transporter isoform a
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E transporter isoform X1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E transporter isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E transporter isoform X3
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant 1
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant 2
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant 3
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant 5
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant 4
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 72 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 67 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 88 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 59 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 50 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 50 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 81 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 81 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 70 ESTs, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Sfi1 homolog, spindle assembly associated (yeast), transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 43 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 186 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 174 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 183 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 180 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 175 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 181 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 186 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 181 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 179 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 179 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X3
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 180 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme isoform X1
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme isoform X9
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme isoform X10
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme isoform X11
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme isoform X12
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme isoform X2
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme isoform X3
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme isoform X4
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme isoform X5
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme isoform X6
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme isoform X7
phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme isoform X8
proline rich 14-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 102 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
proline rich 14-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 100 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline rich 14-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 100 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
proline rich 14-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 102 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant 5
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 62 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 59 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant 4
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant 1
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 34 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant 2
DEP domain containing 5, transcript variant 3
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform 4
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform X1
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform X3
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform 3
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform X2
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform 1
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform X4
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform 5
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform X9
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform X5
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform X12
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform X11
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform X6
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform 2
DEP domain-containing protein 5 isoform X10
chromosome 22 open reading frame 24, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein C22orf24 isoform X1
tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein, eta
solute carrier family 5 (sodium/glucose cotransporter), member 1, transcript variant 1
sodium/glucose cotransporter 1 isoform 1
solute carrier family 5 (sodium/glucose cotransporter), member 1, transcript variant 2
sodium/glucose cotransporter 1 isoform 2
adaptor-related protein complex 1, beta 1 subunit pseudogene 1
chromosome 22 open reading frame 42, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein C22orf42 isoform X1
ret finger protein-like 2, transcript variant 3
ret finger protein-like 2, transcript variant 2
ret finger protein-like 2, transcript variant 4
ret finger protein-like 2, transcript variant 1
ret finger protein-like 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 5 (glucose activated ion channel), member 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 1 EST, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
solute carrier family 5 (glucose activated ion channel), member 4
low affinity sodium-glucose cotransporter
low affinity sodium-glucose cotransporter isoform X1
ret finger protein-like 3, transcript variant 2
ret finger protein-like 3, transcript variant 1
RNA 2',3'-cyclic phosphate and 5'-OH ligase
BPI fold containing family C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
BPI fold containing family C, transcript variant X1
BPI fold-containing family C protein precursor
BPI fold-containing family C protein isoform X1
BPI fold-containing family C protein isoform X2
isoform IIIg is encoded by transcript variant IIIg; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform IIIa is encoded by transcript variant IIIa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform IIIc is encoded by transcript variant IIIc; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 Proteins, and 60% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
like-glycosyltransferase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 134 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
like-glycosyltransferase, transcript variant X1
like-glycosyltransferase, transcript variant 2
like-glycosyltransferase, transcript variant 1
glycosyltransferase-like protein LARGE1 isoform X1
glycosyltransferase-like protein LARGE1 isoform X2
like-glycosyltransferase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycosyltransferase-like protein LARGE1 isoform X3
LARGE antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
LARGE antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 12% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001008494.1
HMG box domain containing 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 111 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
HMG box domain containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 117 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
HMG domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
HMG domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
HMG box domain containing 4, transcript variant 2
HMG box domain containing 4, transcript variant 1
HMG box domain containing 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 119 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
HMG domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
target of myb1 (chicken), transcript variant 3
target of myb1 (chicken), transcript variant 5
target of myb1 (chicken), transcript variant 2
target of myb1 (chicken), transcript variant 1
target of myb1 (chicken), transcript variant 4
target of myb1 (chicken), transcript variant 6
minichromosome maintenance complex component 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 584 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
minichromosome maintenance complex component 5
DNA replication licensing factor MCM5 isoform X1
RASD family, member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
RASD family, member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RASD family, member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 39 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 438 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
apolipoprotein L, 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 509 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 491 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 490 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 487 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 481 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 500 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 482 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 482 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 479 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 480 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant 6
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001082579.1
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001082578.1
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 471 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 479 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 466 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 485 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 499 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 483 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant 3
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant 4
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant 1
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant 2
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 468 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X2
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X12
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X6
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X1
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X14
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X11
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X16
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X15
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X18
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform 4
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X8
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform 2
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X17
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X20
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X5
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001076048.1
isoform 6 is encoded by transcript variant 6; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform 6
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X3
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X4
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X13
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001076047.1
isoform 5 is encoded by transcript variant 5; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform 5
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform 3
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform 1
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X10
RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 2, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 isoform X19
apolipoprotein L, 3, transcript variant beta/b
apolipoprotein L, 3, transcript variant beta/a
apolipoprotein L, 3, transcript variant alpha/d
apolipoprotein L, 3, transcript variant alpha/c
apolipoprotein L, 3, transcript variant alpha/b
apolipoprotein L, 3, transcript variant alpha/a
apolipoprotein L, 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 58 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
apolipoprotein L, 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
apolipoprotein L, 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 56 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
apolipoprotein L, 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 57 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant alpha/d; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant beta/a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant beta/b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
apolipoprotein L, 4, transcript variant b
apolipoprotein L, 4, transcript variant a
isoform 2 precursor is encoded by transcript variant b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
apolipoprotein L, 2, transcript variant beta
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_145637.1
apolipoprotein L, 2, transcript variant alpha
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_030882.2
apolipoprotein L, 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
apolipoprotein L, 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_663612.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_112092.1
apolipoprotein L, 1, transcript variant 2
apolipoprotein L, 1, transcript variant 3
apolipoprotein L, 1, transcript variant 1
apolipoprotein L, 1, transcript variant 4
apolipoprotein L, 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
apolipoprotein L, 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 mRNAs, 162 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 132 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
FAD-dependent oxidoreductase domain containing 2, transcript variant 2
FAD-dependent oxidoreductase domain containing 2, transcript variant 1
FAD-dependent oxidoreductase domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
FAD-dependent oxidoreductase domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
FAD-dependent oxidoreductase domain-containing protein 2 precursor
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit D
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit D
calcium channel, voltage-dependent, gamma subunit 2
voltage-dependent calcium channel gamma-2 subunit
intraflagellar transport 27 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant 2
intraflagellar transport 27 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant 1
intraflagellar transport 27 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 42 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport protein 27 homolog isoform 2
intraflagellar transport protein 27 homolog isoform 1
intraflagellar transport protein 27 homolog isoform X1
intraflagellar transport 27 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 60 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
neutrophil cytosolic factor 4, 40kDa, transcript variant 2
neutrophil cytosolic factor 4, 40kDa, transcript variant 1
colony stimulating factor 2 receptor, beta, low-affinity (granulocyte-macrophage), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 38 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 2 receptor, beta, low-affinity (granulocyte-macrophage), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
colony stimulating factor 2 receptor, beta, low-affinity (granulocyte-macrophage)
cytokine receptor common subunit beta isoform X1
cytokine receptor common subunit beta precursor
cytokine receptor common subunit beta isoform X3
testis expressed 33, transcript variant 2
testis expressed 33, transcript variant 1
testis-expressed sequence 33 protein isoform 1
testis-expressed sequence 33 protein isoform 2
thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (rhodanese), transcript variant 2
thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (rhodanese), transcript variant 1
mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase, transcript variant 3
mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase, transcript variant 2
mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase, transcript variant 1
mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 33 ESTs, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 118 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase isoform 1
3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase isoform X2
3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase isoform 2
3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase isoform X1
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 17, transcript variant 1
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 17, transcript variant 2
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 17, transcript variant 3
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 17, transcript variant 4
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 17, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 67 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD17 isoform X4
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD17 isoform 1
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD17 isoform 2
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD17 isoform 4
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD17 isoform 3
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 17, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 17, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 17, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD17 isoform X2
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD17 isoform X3
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD17 isoform X1
transmembrane protease, serine 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protease, serine 6, transcript variant 1
transmembrane protease, serine 6, transcript variant 3
transmembrane protease, serine 6, transcript variant 2
transmembrane protease, serine 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protease serine 6 isoform 2
transmembrane protease serine 6 isoform 3
transmembrane protease serine 6 isoform X1
transmembrane protease serine 6 isoform X2
transmembrane protease serine 6 isoform 1
interleukin-2 receptor subunit beta precursor
C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 52 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 52 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 6, transcript variant 2
C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 6, transcript variant 1
complement C1q tumor necrosis factor-related protein 6
complement C1q tumor necrosis factor-related protein 6 isoform X1
complement C1q tumor necrosis factor-related protein 6 isoform X2
somatostatin receptor 3, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001051.3
somatostatin receptor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
somatostatin receptor 3, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001278687.1
somatostatin receptor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 2 (rho family, small GTP binding protein Rac2)
ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 2
ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 2 (rho family, small GTP binding protein Rac2), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 128 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, and 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
extracellular leucine-rich repeat and fibronectin type III domain containing 2
extracellular leucine-rich repeat and fibronectin type III domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 119 mRNAs, 18 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
extracellular leucine-rich repeat and fibronectin type III domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 119 mRNAs, 19 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
extracellular leucine-rich repeat and fibronectin type III domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 29 isoform X1
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 29 isoform X2
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 29 isoform X3
protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 29 precursor
MFNG O-fucosylpeptide 3-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant 3
MFNG O-fucosylpeptide 3-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant 1
MFNG O-fucosylpeptide 3-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant 2
beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase manic fringe isoform 1
beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase manic fringe isoform 2
caspase recruitment domain family, member 10
caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 10
CDC42 effector protein (Rho GTPase binding) 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 91 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDC42 effector protein (Rho GTPase binding) 1
CDC42 effector protein (Rho GTPase binding) 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 106 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDC42 effector protein (Rho GTPase binding) 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 101 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
golgi-associated, gamma adaptin ear containing, ARF binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 342 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
golgi-associated, gamma adaptin ear containing, ARF binding protein 1, transcript variant 1
golgi-associated, gamma adaptin ear containing, ARF binding protein 1, transcript variant 4
golgi-associated, gamma adaptin ear containing, ARF binding protein 1, transcript variant 2
golgi-associated, gamma adaptin ear containing, ARF binding protein 1, transcript variant 3
golgi-associated, gamma adaptin ear containing, ARF binding protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 411 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein GGA1 isoform X1
ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein GGA1 isoform 1
ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein GGA1 isoform 4
ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein GGA1 isoform X7
ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein GGA1 isoform 2
ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein GGA1 isoform 3
golgi-associated, gamma adaptin ear containing, ARF binding protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 302 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
golgi-associated, gamma adaptin ear containing, ARF binding protein 1, transcript variant 5
golgi-associated, gamma adaptin ear containing, ARF binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 340 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein GGA1 isoform X2
golgi-associated, gamma adaptin ear containing, ARF binding protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 304 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein GGA1 isoform 5
ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein GGA1 isoform X4
ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein GGA1 isoform X8
golgi-associated, gamma adaptin ear containing, ARF binding protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 256 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein GGA1 isoform X6
pyridoxal (pyridoxine, vitamin B6) phosphatase
TRIO and F-actin binding protein, transcript variant 6
TRIO and F-actin-binding protein isoform 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
TRIO and F-actin binding protein, transcript variant 1
TRIO and F-actin binding protein, transcript variant 2
TRIO and F-actin-binding protein isoform 1
TRIO and F-actin-binding protein isoform 2
glycine C-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycine C-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycine C-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
glycine C-acetyltransferase, transcript variant 1
glycine C-acetyltransferase, transcript variant 2
glycine C-acetyltransferase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 72 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
2-amino-3-ketobutyrate coenzyme A ligase, mitochondrial isoform X1
2-amino-3-ketobutyrate coenzyme A ligase, mitochondrial isoform X4
2-amino-3-ketobutyrate coenzyme A ligase, mitochondrial isoform 1 precursor
2-amino-3-ketobutyrate coenzyme A ligase, mitochondrial isoform X2
2-amino-3-ketobutyrate coenzyme A ligase, mitochondrial isoform X3
2-amino-3-ketobutyrate coenzyme A ligase, mitochondrial isoform 2 precursor
ankyrin repeat domain 54, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 54, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 54, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ankyrin repeat domain 54, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 54, transcript variant 2
ankyrin repeat domain 54, transcript variant 1
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 54 isoform X1
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 54
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 54 isoform X2
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 54 isoform X3
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 54 isoform X4
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit L, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5285 ESTs, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit L isoform X2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit L, transcript variant 1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit L, transcript variant 2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit L, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 895 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit L isoform 1
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit L isoform 2
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit L isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 123 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 104 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 115 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 23, transcript variant 2
chromosome 22 open reading frame 23, transcript variant 1
chromosome 22 open reading frame 23, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 23, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 68 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 23, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 23, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 23, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 22 open reading frame 23, transcript variant X6
polymerase (RNA) II (DNA directed) polypeptide F
polymerase (RNA) II (DNA directed) polypeptide F, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA-directed RNA polymerases I, II, and III subunit RPABC2
DNA-directed RNA polymerases I, II, and III subunit RPABC2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein interacting with PRKCA 1, transcript variant 1
protein interacting with PRKCA 1, transcript variant 2
protein interacting with PRKCA 1, transcript variant 3
protein interacting with PRKCA 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 54 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein interacting with PRKCA 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 55 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein interacting with PRKCA 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 48 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein interacting with PRKCA 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 48 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 16 (monocarboxylate transporter), member 8
uncharacterized LOC101927119, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC101927119, transcript variant X4
BAI1-associated protein 2-like 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor 1-associated protein 2-like protein 2
brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor 1-associated protein 2-like protein 2 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC101927119, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC101927119, transcript variant X1
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent), transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 107 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 137 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 191 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent), transcript variant 3
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 148 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent), transcript variant 2
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent), transcript variant 1
85/88 kDa calcium-independent phospholipase A2 isoform b
85/88 kDa calcium-independent phospholipase A2 isoform X1
85/88 kDa calcium-independent phospholipase A2 isoform X13
85/88 kDa calcium-independent phospholipase A2 isoform X2
85/88 kDa calcium-independent phospholipase A2 isoform X3
85/88 kDa calcium-independent phospholipase A2 isoform a
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent), transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 106 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent), transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 103 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent), transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent), transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 101 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent), transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 99 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
85/88 kDa calcium-independent phospholipase A2 isoform X8
v-maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog F, transcript variant 3
v-maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog F, transcript variant 1
v-maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog F, transcript variant 5
v-maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog F, transcript variant 4
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protein 184B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 184B, transcript variant 1
transmembrane protein 184B, transcript variant 3
transmembrane protein 184B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 315 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 184B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 228 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 184B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 224 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 184B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 237 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 184B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 254 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 184B, transcript variant 2
transmembrane protein 184B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 239 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
casein kinase 1, epsilon, transcript variant 2
casein kinase 1, epsilon, transcript variant 1
TPTE and PTEN homologous inositol lipid phosphatase pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 4, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_152868.2
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 4, transcript variant 2
KDEL (Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu) endoplasmic reticulum protein retention receptor 3, transcript variant 1
KDEL (Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu) endoplasmic reticulum protein retention receptor 3, transcript variant 2
ER lumen protein retaining receptor 3 isoform a
ER lumen protein retaining receptor 3 isoform b
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box helicase 17, transcript variant 1
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box helicase 17, transcript variant 3
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 1; non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX17 isoform 1
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 3; non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX17 isoform 3
DNA meiotic recombinase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DNA meiotic recombinase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DNA meiotic recombinase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA meiotic recombinase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DNA meiotic recombinase 1, transcript variant 1
DNA meiotic recombinase 1, transcript variant 2
meiotic recombination protein DMC1/LIM15 homolog isoform X4
meiotic recombination protein DMC1/LIM15 homolog isoform X2
meiotic recombination protein DMC1/LIM15 homolog isoform 2
meiotic recombination protein DMC1/LIM15 homolog isoform X3
meiotic recombination protein DMC1/LIM15 homolog isoform 1
meiotic recombination protein DMC1/LIM15 homolog isoform X1
DNA meiotic recombinase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DNA meiotic recombinase 1, transcript variant 3
family with sequence similarity 227, member A
family with sequence similarity 227, member A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 227, member A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 227, member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 227, member A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 227, member A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388900 isoform X3
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388900 isoform X2
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388900 isoform X6
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388900 isoform X5
family with sequence similarity 227, member A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388900
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388900 isoform X4
putative uncharacterized protein LOC388900 isoform X1
chibby homolog 1 (Drosophila), transcript variant 2
chibby homolog 1 (Drosophila), transcript variant 1
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 22 homolog (yeast)
mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM22 homolog
Josephin domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 261 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Josephin domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 261 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Josephin domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 270 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Josephin domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 261 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTP binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 149 ESTs, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
GTP binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 154 ESTs, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sad1 and UNC84 domain containing 2, transcript variant 2
Sad1 and UNC84 domain containing 2, transcript variant 1
Sad1 and UNC84 domain containing 2, transcript variant 3
Sad1 and UNC84 domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 313 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
Sad1 and UNC84 domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 305 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
SUN domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
SUN domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
SUN domain-containing protein 2 isoform b
SUN domain-containing protein 2 isoform a
non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromobox homolog 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 253 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_014292.3
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3A, transcript variant 1
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3A, transcript variant 3
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3A isoform a
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3A isoform b
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3B, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_004900.4
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3B, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001270411.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_004891.4
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3B isoform a
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001257340.1
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3B isoform b
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3C
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3D
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3D, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3D, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3D, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3D isoform X2
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3D isoform X4
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3D isoform X5
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3F, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3F, transcript variant 1
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3F, transcript variant 2
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3F isoform a
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3F isoform b
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3G
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3G, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 59 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3G isoform X1
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3H, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001166003.1
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3H, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_181773.3
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3H, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001166002.1
apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3H, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001166004.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_861438.2
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3H isoform 2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001159474.1
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 3; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3H isoform 3
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001159475.1
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3H isoform 1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001159476.1
isoform 4 is encoded by transcript variant 4; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3H isoform 4
chromobox homolog 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 141 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
chromobox homolog 7, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 141 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromobox homolog 7, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 141 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromobox homolog 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 141 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromobox homolog 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 139 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromobox homolog 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 142 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
platelet-derived growth factor beta polypeptide, transcript variant 1
platelet-derived growth factor beta polypeptide, transcript variant 2
isoform 1 preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
platelet-derived growth factor subunit B isoform 1 preproprotein
isoform 2 preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
platelet-derived growth factor subunit B isoform 2 preproprotein
ribosomal protein L3, transcript variant 2
ribosomal protein L3, transcript variant 1
isoform 1a is encoded by transcript variant 1a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 1b is encoded by transcript variant 1b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 1c is encoded by transcript variant 1c; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TGF-beta activated kinase 1/MAP3K7 binding protein 1, transcript variant beta
TGF-beta activated kinase 1/MAP3K7 binding protein 1, transcript variant alpha
isoform beta is encoded by transcript variant beta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TGF-beta-activated kinase 1 and MAP3K7-binding protein 1 isoform beta
isoform alpha is encoded by transcript variant alpha; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TGF-beta-activated kinase 1 and MAP3K7-binding protein 1 isoform alpha
mannosyl (beta-1,4-)-glycoprotein beta-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 87 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,4-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase isoform X1
mannosyl (beta-1,4-)-glycoprotein beta-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant 1
mannosyl (beta-1,4-)-glycoprotein beta-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 87 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
mannosyl (beta-1,4-)-glycoprotein beta-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 87 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,4-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase isoform X3
mannosyl (beta-1,4-)-glycoprotein beta-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, transcript variant 2
beta-1,4-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase
beta-1,4-mannosyl-glycoprotein 4-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase isoform X2
mitochondrial elongation factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 259 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial dynamics protein MID51; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial dynamics protein MID51 isoform X2
activating transcription factor 4, transcript variant 1
activating transcription factor 4, transcript variant 2
cyclic AMP-dependent transcription factor ATF-4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_194326.2
calcium channel, voltage-dependent, T type, alpha 1I subunit, transcript variant 1
calcium channel, voltage-dependent, T type, alpha 1I subunit, transcript variant 2
voltage-dependent T-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1I isoform a
voltage-dependent T-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1I isoform b
calcium channel, voltage-dependent, T type, alpha 1I subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 19 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
voltage-dependent T-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1I isoform X1
ENTH domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 22 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ENTH domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ENTH domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
ENTH domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ENTH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
ENTH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
ENTH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
ENTH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
ENTH domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ENTH domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
GRB2-related adaptor protein 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 42 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRB2-related adaptor protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 111 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRB2-related adaptor protein 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 42 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
GRB2-related adapter protein 2 isoform X1
GRB2-related adapter protein 2 isoform X6
GRB2-related adapter protein 2 isoform X7
family with sequence similarity 83, member F
trinucleotide repeat containing 6B, transcript variant 3
trinucleotide repeat-containing gene 6B protein isoform 3
trinucleotide repeat containing 6B, transcript variant 1
trinucleotide repeat containing 6B, transcript variant 2
trinucleotide repeat-containing gene 6B protein isoform 1
trinucleotide repeat-containing gene 6B protein isoform 2
adenylosuccinate lyase, transcript variant 1
adenylosuccinate lyase, transcript variant 2
small G protein signaling modulator 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 113 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
small G protein signaling modulator 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 118 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
small G protein signaling modulator 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 166 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
small G protein signaling modulator 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 166 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
small G protein signaling modulator 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 160 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
small G protein signaling modulator 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 109 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
small G protein signaling modulator 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 124 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
small G protein signaling modulator 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 77 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
small G protein signaling modulator 3 isoform X2
small G protein signaling modulator 3 isoform X3
small G protein signaling modulator 3 isoform X1
small G protein signaling modulator 3 isoform X6
small G protein signaling modulator 3 isoform X4
small G protein signaling modulator 3 isoform X8
megakaryoblastic leukemia (translocation) 1, transcript variant 3
megakaryoblastic leukemia (translocation) 1, transcript variant 1
megakaryoblastic leukemia (translocation) 1, transcript variant 4
megakaryoblastic leukemia (translocation) 1, transcript variant 2
megakaryoblastic leukemia (translocation) 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 126 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
megakaryoblastic leukemia (translocation) 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 118 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
megakaryoblastic leukemia (translocation) 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 117 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC102723646, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102723646, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102723646, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC102723646, transcript variant X2
melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1
melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 isoform X1
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; peroxisomal membrane protein, 34kDa), member 17, transcript variant 7
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; peroxisomal membrane protein, 34kDa), member 17, transcript variant 6
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; peroxisomal membrane protein, 34kDa), member 17, transcript variant 3
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; peroxisomal membrane protein, 34kDa), member 17, transcript variant 5
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; peroxisomal membrane protein, 34kDa), member 17, transcript variant 1
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; peroxisomal membrane protein, 34kDa), member 17, transcript variant 2
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; peroxisomal membrane protein, 34kDa), member 17, transcript variant 4
peroxisomal membrane protein PMP34 isoform 3
peroxisomal membrane protein PMP34 isoform 1
peroxisomal membrane protein PMP34 isoform 2
suppression of tumorigenicity 13 (colon carcinoma) (Hsp70 interacting protein), transcript variant 2
suppression of tumorigenicity 13 (colon carcinoma) (Hsp70 interacting protein), transcript variant 1
X-prolyl aminopeptidase (aminopeptidase P) 3, putative, transcript variant 1
X-prolyl aminopeptidase (aminopeptidase P) 3, putative, transcript variant 2
probable Xaa-Pro aminopeptidase 3 isoform 1
probable Xaa-Pro aminopeptidase 3 isoform 2
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 7
E1A binding protein p300, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 143 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
histone acetyltransferase p300 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC101927279, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 19% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927279, transcript variant X2
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 2
chondroadherin-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
chondroadherin-like, transcript variant X1
Ran GTPase activating protein 1, transcript variant 2
Ran GTPase activating protein 1, transcript variant 1
Ran GTPase activating protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 228 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ran GTPase activating protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 230 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Ran GTPase activating protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 235 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ran GTPase-activating protein 1 isoform X1
ran GTPase-activating protein 1 isoform X2
ran GTPase-activating protein 1 isoform X3
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 7B
thyrotrophic embryonic factor, transcript variant 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 29% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
thyrotrophic embryonic factor, transcript variant 1
transducer of ERBB2, 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 229 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
transducer of ERBB2, 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 218 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
PHD finger-like domain-containing protein 5A
aconitate hydratase, mitochondrial precursor
polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide H (22.9kD), transcript variant 5
polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide H (22.9kD), transcript variant 6
polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide H (22.9kD), transcript variant 1
polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide H (22.9kD), transcript variant 2
polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide H (22.9kD), transcript variant 3
polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide H (22.9kD), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 65 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide H (22.9kD), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 70 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
DNA-directed RNA polymerase III subunit RPC8 isoform b
DNA-directed RNA polymerase III subunit RPC8 isoform a
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DNA-directed RNA polymerase III subunit RPC8 isoform X3
cold shock domain containing C2, RNA binding
phosphomannomutase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphomannomutase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 82 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphomannomutase 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 76 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphomannomutase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 84 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphomannomutase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 85 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphomannomutase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 76 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
desumoylating isopeptidase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 6, transcript variant 1
X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 6, transcript variant 3
X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 6, transcript variant 4
X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 6, transcript variant 2
X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 6 isoform 1
X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 6 isoform 2
X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 6 isoform 3
NHP2 non-histone chromosome protein 2-like 1 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 541 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
NHP2 non-histone chromosome protein 2-like 1 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 542 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
NHP2 non-histone chromosome protein 2-like 1 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 2
NHP2 non-histone chromosome protein 2-like 1 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 1
uncharacterized protein C22orf46 precursor
meiosis inhibitor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
meiosis inhibitor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 38 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
meiosis inhibitor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
meiosis inhibitor 1, transcript variant X3
coiled-coil domain containing 134, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 18 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_024821.2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 134 isoform X1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 134 precursor
sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 2, transcript variant 2
sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 2, transcript variant 1
sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2
sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 336 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 isoform X1
shisa family member 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
shisa family member 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
shisa family member 8, transcript variant X1
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 13C
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 13C
centromere protein M, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 45% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
centromere protein M, transcript variant 2
centromere protein M, transcript variant 1
centromere protein M, transcript variant 3
centromere protein M, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 634
uncharacterized LOC102723706, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102723706, transcript variant X2
WBP2 N-terminal like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
postacrosomal sheath WW domain-binding protein
WBP2 N-terminal like, transcript variant X2
WBP2 N-terminal like, transcript variant X3
N-acetylgalactosaminidase, alpha-, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 162 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-acetylgalactosaminidase, alpha-, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 158 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-acetylgalactosaminidase, alpha-, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 148 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase isoform X1
alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase isoform X2
alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase precursor
alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase isoform X3
family with sequence similarity 109, member B
family with sequence similarity 109, member B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 55 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
single-pass membrane protein with aspartate-rich tail 1
essential MCU regulator, mitochondrial precursor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
single-pass membrane protein with aspartate-rich tail 1, mitochondrial precursor
NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplex, 6, 14kDa
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 6
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_034118.1
uncharacterized LOC102723722, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily D, polypeptide 6, transcript variant 2
cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily D, polypeptide 6, transcript variant 1
cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily D, polypeptide 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723722, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723722, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized protein LOC102723722 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC102723722, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723722, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein LOC102723722 isoform X1
cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily D, polypeptide 7, pseudogene
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_002570.2
The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transcription factor 20 (AR1), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 77 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 20 (AR1), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 75 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 20 (AR1), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 77 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 20 (AR1), transcript variant X5
transcription factor 20 (AR1), transcript variant 2
transcription factor 20 (AR1), transcript variant 1
transcription factor 20 (AR1), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
opioid growth factor receptor pseudogene
uncharacterized LOC102723775, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723775, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
NFAT activating protein with ITAM motif 1
NFAT activating protein with ITAM motif 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosomal RNA processing 7 homolog A (S. cerevisiae)
ribosomal RNA-processing protein 7 homolog A
serine hydrolase-like 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine hydrolase-like 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine hydrolase-like 2, transcript variant 3
serine hydrolase-like 2, transcript variant 1
serine hydrolase-like 2, transcript variant 4
serine hydrolase-like 2, transcript variant 2
serine hydrolase-like 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine hydrolase-like protein 2 isoform a
serine hydrolase-like protein 2 isoform X8
serine hydrolase-like protein 2 isoform b
ribosomal RNA processing 7 homolog B (S. cerevisiae)
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_002184.2
polymerase (DNA-directed), delta interacting protein 3, transcript variant 2
polymerase (DNA-directed), delta interacting protein 3, transcript variant 4
polymerase (DNA-directed), delta interacting protein 3, transcript variant 1
polymerase (DNA-directed), delta interacting protein 3, transcript variant 3
polymerase delta-interacting protein 3 isoform 2
polymerase delta-interacting protein 3 isoform 1
polymerase delta-interacting protein 3 isoform 3
cytochrome b5 reductase 3, transcript variant 1
cytochrome b5 reductase 3, transcript variant 2
cytochrome b5 reductase 3, transcript variant 4
cytochrome b5 reductase 3, transcript variant 3
cytochrome b5 reductase 3, transcript variant 5
NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase 3 isoform 1
NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase 3 isoform 3
NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase 3 isoform 2
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit G2
alpha 1,4-galactosyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 50 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha 1,4-galactosyltransferase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 43 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha 1,4-galactosyltransferase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 45 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha 1,4-galactosyltransferase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 44 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha 1,4-galactosyltransferase, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 42 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha 1,4-galactosyltransferase, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 41 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
alpha 1,4-galactosyltransferase, transcript variant X7
alpha 1,4-galactosyltransferase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 41 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
lactosylceramide 4-alpha-galactosyltransferase
lactosylceramide 4-alpha-galactosyltransferase isoform X1
lactosylceramide 4-alpha-galactosyltransferase isoform X2
lactosylceramide 4-alpha-galactosyltransferase isoform X4
lactosylceramide 4-alpha-galactosyltransferase isoform X5
lactosylceramide 4-alpha-galactosyltransferase isoform X6
lactosylceramide 4-alpha-galactosyltransferase isoform X7
lactosylceramide 4-alpha-galactosyltransferase isoform X8
lactosylceramide 4-alpha-galactosyltransferase isoform X9
ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase activating protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 327 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase activating protein 3, transcript variant 2
ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase activating protein 3, transcript variant 1
ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase-activating protein 3 isoform 2
ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase-activating protein 3 isoform X1
ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase-activating protein 3 isoform 1
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 2, transcript variant 1
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 2, transcript variant 3
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 2, transcript variant 2
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 302 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 275 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 274 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 274 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 275 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons protein 2 isoform B
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons protein 2 isoform X1
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons protein 2 isoform A
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons protein 2 isoform X2
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons protein 2 isoform X3
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons protein 2 isoform X4
protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons protein 2 isoform X5
uncharacterized LOC101927393, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family, member 1, transcript variant 1
tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family, member 1, transcript variant 2
tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family, member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable tubulin polyglutamylase TTLL1 isoform X1
uncharacterized LOC102723830, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102723830, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723830, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723830, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102723830, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723830, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102723830, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723830, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102723830, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102723830, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102723830, transcript variant X1
BCL2-interacting killer (apoptosis-inducing)
malonyl CoA:ACP acyltransferase (mitochondrial), transcript variant 2
malonyl CoA:ACP acyltransferase (mitochondrial), transcript variant 1
malonyl CoA:ACP acyltransferase (mitochondrial), transcript variant 3
malonyl-CoA-acyl carrier protein transacylase, mitochondrial isoform a precursor
malonyl-CoA-acyl carrier protein transacylase, mitochondrial isoform b precursor
translocator protein (18kDa), transcript variant PBR
translocator protein (18kDa), transcript variant PBR-S
translocator protein (18kDa), transcript variant 4
translocator protein (18kDa), transcript variant 3
tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family, member 12
tubulin--tyrosine ligase-like protein 12
signal peptide, CUB domain, EGF-like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 1 precursor
signal peptide, CUB and EGF-like domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 25% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
metallophosphoesterase domain containing 1
metallophosphoesterase domain-containing protein 1
EF-hand calcium binding domain 6, transcript variant 2
EF-hand calcium binding domain 6, transcript variant 1
EF-hand calcium binding domain 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
EF-hand calcium binding domain 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 40 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
EF-hand calcium binding domain 6, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 6 isoform a
EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 6 isoform X1
EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 6 isoform X2
EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 6 isoform b
EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 6 isoform X4
EF-hand calcium binding domain 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 6 isoform X3
patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 5, transcript variant 2
patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 5, transcript variant 1
patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 29% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 5 isoform 2
patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 5 isoform 1
patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 5 isoform X1
patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3
patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3
SAMM50 sorting and assembly machinery component
sorting and assembly machinery component 50 homolog
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 122 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 121 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 121 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 121 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723940, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102723940, transcript variant X2
transfer RNA selenocysteine 2 (anticodon UCA); tRNA features were annotated by tRNAscan-SE; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 59 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 41 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 41 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein KIAA1644 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein KIAA1644 isoform X2
uncharacterized protein KIAA1644 precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine zipper, down-regulated in cancer 1-like
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 207, transcript variant 1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 207, transcript variant 2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 207, transcript variant 3
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 229
proline rich 5 (renal), transcript variant 3
proline rich 5 (renal), transcript variant 5
proline rich 5 (renal), transcript variant 6
proline rich 5 (renal), transcript variant 2
proline rich 5 (renal), transcript variant 4
isoform 4 is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proline rich 5 (renal), transcript variant 1
Rho GTPase activating protein 8, transcript variant 1
Rho GTPase activating protein 8, transcript variant 2
Rho GTPase activating protein 8, transcript variant 3
rho GTPase-activating protein 8 isoform 1
rho GTPase-activating protein 8 isoform 2
rho GTPase-activating protein 8 isoform 3
PHD finger protein 21B, transcript variant 2
PHD finger protein 21B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
PHD finger protein 21B, transcript variant 1
PHD finger protein 21B, transcript variant 3
PHD finger protein 21B, transcript variant 4
PHD finger protein 21B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC100506714, transcript variant 1
uncharacterized LOC100506714, transcript variant 2
nucleoporin 50kDa, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 226 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleoporin 50kDa, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 225 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleoporin 50kDa, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 203 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleoporin 50kDa, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 203 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleoporin 50kDa, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 215 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear pore complex protein Nup50 isoform X5
nuclear pore complex protein Nup50 isoform b
nuclear pore complex protein Nup50 isoform X2
nuclear pore complex protein Nup50 isoform X3
nuclear pore complex protein Nup50 isoform X4
nuclear pore complex protein Nup50 isoform X6
nuclear pore complex protein Nup50 isoform a
uncharacterized protein KIAA0930 isoform b
uncharacterized protein KIAA0930 isoform a
family with sequence similarity 118, member A, transcript variant 1
family with sequence similarity 118, member A, transcript variant 2
family with sequence similarity 118, member A, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 77 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 118, member A, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 79 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 118, member A, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 118, member A, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 118, member A, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 118, member A, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 118, member A, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 118, member A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
structural maintenance of chromosomes 1B
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_148674.3
structural maintenance of chromosomes 1B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
structural maintenance of chromosomes 1B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 1B isoform X1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_683515.3
structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 1B
RIB43A domain with coiled-coils 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RIB43A-like with coiled-coils protein 2 isoform X2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_006486.2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_006485.3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001996.3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_006487.2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_006477.2
isoform D precursor is encoded by transcript variant D; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_006476.2
isoform B precursor is encoded by transcript variant B; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001987.2
isoform C precursor is encoded by transcript variant C; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_006478.2
isoform A precursor is encoded by transcript variant A; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 7B
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 899
putative uncharacterized protein C22orf26
uncharacterized LOC642648, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC642648, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 mRNAs, 82 ESTs, 26 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 mRNAs, 82 ESTs, 26 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, transcript variant 5
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, transcript variant 3
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 mRNAs, 84 ESTs, 26 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 mRNAs, 83 ESTs, 26 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 mRNAs, 83 ESTs, 26 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 mRNAs, 83 ESTs, 26 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha isoform X1
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha isoform X3
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha isoform X4
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha isoform X5
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha isoform X6
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha isoform X7
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha isoform X8
cysteine-rich, DPF motif domain containing 1
cysteine-rich DPF motif domain-containing protein 1
polycystin (PKD) family receptor for egg jelly
polycystic kidney disease and receptor for egg jelly-related protein precursor
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_017931.2
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 38, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 194 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_060401.2
G-2 and S-phase expressed 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 mRNAs, 160 ESTs, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_016426.6
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_057510.4
G2 and S phase-expressed protein 1 isoform X1
tRNA 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate methyltransferase, transcript variant 1
tRNA 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate methyltransferase, transcript variant 7
tRNA 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate methyltransferase, transcript variant 2
tRNA 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate methyltransferase, transcript variant 3
tRNA 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate methyltransferase, transcript variant 4
tRNA 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate methyltransferase, transcript variant 5
tRNA 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate methyltransferase, transcript variant 6
tRNA 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate methyltransferase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 45 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tRNA 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate methyltransferase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial tRNA-specific 2-thiouridylase 1 isoform a
mitochondrial tRNA-specific 2-thiouridylase 1 isoform g
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial tRNA-specific 2-thiouridylase 1 isoform d
mitochondrial tRNA-specific 2-thiouridylase 1 isoform X3
mitochondrial tRNA-specific 2-thiouridylase 1 isoform X6
mitochondrial tRNA-specific 2-thiouridylase 1 isoform e
mitochondrial tRNA-specific 2-thiouridylase 1 isoform f
cadherin, EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 1
cadherin, EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 67 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 1 precursor
cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 1 isoform X1
GRAM domain containing 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 124 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRAM domain-containing protein 4 isoform X7
GRAM domain containing 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRAM domain containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 123 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRAM domain containing 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 114 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRAM domain containing 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 117 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRAM domain-containing protein 4 isoform X5
GRAM domain-containing protein 4 isoform X6
GRAM domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
GRAM domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
GRAM domain containing 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 124 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
GRAM domain containing 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 123 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
GRAM domain containing 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 123 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_015124.3
GRAM domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
GRAM domain-containing protein 4 isoform X4
GRAM domain-containing protein 4 isoform X8
TBC1 domain family, member 22A, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001284304.1
TBC1 domain family, member 22A, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_014346.3
TBC1 domain family, member 22A, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001284303.1
TBC1 domain family, member 22A, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 243 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family, member 22A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 132 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family, member 22A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 127 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family member 22A isoform X7
TBC1 domain family member 22A isoform X5
TBC1 domain family, member 22A, transcript variant 5
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_104292.1
TBC1 domain family, member 22A, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001284305.1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 898
uncharacterized LOC284930, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, and 28% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC284930, transcript variant X2
family with sequence similarity 19 (chemokine (C-C motif)-like), member A5, transcript variant 1
family with sequence similarity 19 (chemokine (C-C motif)-like), member A5, transcript variant 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 92 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 96 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 92 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 88 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 92 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 85 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 87 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 93 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 88 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 67 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 67 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_014577.1
bromodomain-containing protein 1 isoform X9
bromodomain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
bromodomain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
bromodomain-containing protein 1 isoform X10
bromodomain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
bromodomain-containing protein 1 isoform X7
bromodomain-containing protein 1 isoform X8
bromodomain-containing protein 1 isoform X13
bromodomain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 36 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain containing 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
bromodomain-containing protein 1 isoform X12
bromodomain-containing protein 1 isoform X11
zinc finger, BED-type containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 91 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger BED domain-containing protein 4
zinc finger BED domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
dol-P-Man:Man(7)GlcNAc(2)-PP-Dol alpha-1,6-mannosyltransferase
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domains 2, transcript variant 1
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domains 2, transcript variant 5
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domains 2, transcript variant 2
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domains 2, transcript variant 4
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domains 2, transcript variant 3
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domains 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 136 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domains 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 79 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domain protein 2 isoform X1
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domain protein 2 isoform a precursor
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domain protein 2 isoform b precursor
isoform d precursor is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domain protein 2 isoform d precursor
isoform c precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domain protein 2 isoform c precursor
cysteine-rich with EGF-like domain protein 2 isoform X2
tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family, member 8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy with subcortical cysts 1, transcript variant 1
megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy with subcortical cysts 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1149 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy with subcortical cysts 1, transcript variant 2
Mov10l1, Moloney leukemia virus 10-like 1, homolog (mouse), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 49 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Mov10l1, Moloney leukemia virus 10-like 1, homolog (mouse), transcript variant 1
Mov10l1, Moloney leukemia virus 10-like 1, homolog (mouse), transcript variant 2
Mov10l1, Moloney leukemia virus 10-like 1, homolog (mouse), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Mov10l1, Moloney leukemia virus 10-like 1, homolog (mouse), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 46 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Mov10l1, Moloney leukemia virus 10-like 1, homolog (mouse), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 40 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Mov10l1, Moloney leukemia virus 10-like 1, homolog (mouse), transcript variant 3
Mov10l1, Moloney leukemia virus 10-like 1, homolog (mouse), transcript variant 4
TraB domain containing, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 87 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
TraB domain containing, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 105 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
TraB domain containing, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 72 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
TraB domain containing, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 82 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
TraB domain containing, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 76 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
TraB domain containing, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 67 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
TraB domain containing, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 89 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
TraB domain containing, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 90 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
TraB domain containing, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 125 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
TraB domain containing, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 71 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
traB domain-containing protein isoform X1
traB domain-containing protein isoform X3
traB domain-containing protein isoform X2
traB domain-containing protein isoform X4
traB domain-containing protein isoform X5
traB domain-containing protein isoform X6
traB domain-containing protein isoform X7
uncharacterized LOC101928719, transcript variant X2
tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 6
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_020461.3
tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 48 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 81 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_065194.2
histone deacetylase 10, transcript variant 2
histone deacetylase 10, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_002969.3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_002751.5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 mRNAs, 363 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 mRNAs, 363 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 mRNAs, 362 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 mRNAs, 363 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 mRNAs, 364 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN/MADD domain containing 6B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 72 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DENN/MADD domain containing 6B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 83 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN/MADD domain containing 6B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
DENN/MADD domain containing 6B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant 2
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant 1
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant 4
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant 3
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 153 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 145 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 165 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 142 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 160 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 143 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 205 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 215 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 143 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 136 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 165 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 158 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X3
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X4
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X6
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X7
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform 2
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X10
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X11
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X8
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X9
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X12
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform 1
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X13
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform 3
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform 4
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 118 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 2 isoform X5
SET binding factor 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 252 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET binding factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 237 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET binding factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 244 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET binding factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 248 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
myotubularin-related protein 5 isoform X5
myotubularin-related protein 5 isoform X2
myotubularin-related protein 5 isoform X4
myotubularin-related protein 5 isoform X1
ADM2 preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
myo-inositol oxygenase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
myo-inositol oxygenase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lipase maturation factor 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 143 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
lipase maturation factor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 150 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
lipase maturation factor 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 142 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
non-SMC condensin II complex, subunit H2, transcript variant 3
non-SMC condensin II complex, subunit H2, transcript variant 2
non-SMC condensin II complex, subunit H2, transcript variant 1
non-SMC condensin II complex, subunit H2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 78 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
condensin-2 complex subunit H2 isoform 3
condensin-2 complex subunit H2 isoform 2
condensin-2 complex subunit H2 isoform 1
condensin-2 complex subunit H2 isoform X1
SCO2 cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein, transcript variant 2
SCO2 cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein, transcript variant 3
SCO2 cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein, transcript variant 1
SCO2 cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein, transcript variant 4
protein SCO2 homolog, mitochondrial precursor
thymidine phosphorylase, transcript variant 2
thymidine phosphorylase, transcript variant 5
thymidine phosphorylase, transcript variant 1
thymidine phosphorylase, transcript variant 4
thymidine phosphorylase, transcript variant 3
isoform 1 proprotein is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
thymidine phosphorylase isoform 1 proprotein
isoform 1 proprotein is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 1 proprotein is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 1 proprotein is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 2 proprotein is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
thymidine phosphorylase isoform 2 proprotein
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 3B, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 3B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 3B, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 3B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 3B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
outer dense fiber of sperm tails 3B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
synaptonemal complex central element protein 3
carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1B (muscle), transcript variant 5
carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1B (muscle), transcript variant 7
carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1B (muscle), transcript variant 6
carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1B (muscle), transcript variant 2
carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1B (muscle), transcript variant 3
carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1B (muscle), transcript variant 1
carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1B (muscle), transcript variant 8
carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, muscle isoform isoform c
carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, muscle isoform isoform d
carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, muscle isoform isoform a
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC101928825, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101928825, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101928825, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 interacting protein 2, transcript variant 1
C-Jun-amino-terminal kinase-interacting protein 2 isoform 1
mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 interacting protein 2, transcript variant 2
C-Jun-amino-terminal kinase-interacting protein 2 isoform 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 175 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform a precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_033517.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and 1 indel and aligns at 99% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_277052.1
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution and 1 indel and aligns at 99% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains protein 3
spermidine/spermine N(1)-acetyltransferase-like protein 1-like, transcript variant X1
spermidine/spermine N(1)-acetyltransferase-like protein 1-like, transcript variant X2
spermidine/spermine N(1)-acetyltransferase-like protein 1-like isoform X1
spermidine/spermine N(1)-acetyltransferase-like protein 1-like isoform X2
ribosomal protein L23a pseudogene 82, transcript variant 1
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B, transcript variant 2
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B, transcript variant 3
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B, transcript variant 6
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B, transcript variant 1
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B, transcript variant 7
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B, transcript variant 4
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B, transcript variant 5
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L23a pseudogene 82, transcript variant 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns