Homo sapiens chromosome 18, GRCh38 Primary Assembly.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
HSA18p11 beta-tubulin 4Q pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
interleukin 9 receptor pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA mir-8078; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 14 (tRNA-guanine transglycosylase); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
THO complex 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collectin sub-family member 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
centrin, EF-hand protein, 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
clusterin-like 1 (retinal); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
chromosome 18 open reading frame 56; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
thymidylate synthetase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
enolase superfamily member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
v-yes-1 Yamaguchi sarcoma viral oncogene homolog 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
bolA family member 2B pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit, non-ATPase, 8 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide 1 (pituitary); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; phosphate carrier), member 3 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIc pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 470; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATPase family, AAA domain containing 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
axin interactor, dorsalization associated pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
methyltransferase like 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
NDC80 kinetochore complex component; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
katanin p80 subunit B-like 1 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromobox homolog 3 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
elastin microfibril interfacer 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
lipin 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cysteine and histidine-rich domain (CHORD) containing 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide C pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
myomesin 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U7 small nuclear 25 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
myosin, light chain 12A, regulatory, non-sarcomeric; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
myosin, light chain 12B, regulatory; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L31 pseudogene 59; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
immunoglobulin lambda joining-constant/OR18 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L21 pseudogene 127; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
biorientation of chromosomes in cell division 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DAP-1; DAP-1-ALPHA; DAP-1-BETA; GKAP; hGKAP; SAPAP1
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
zinc finger protein 592 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DLGAP1 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DLGAP1 antisense RNA 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA mir-6718; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DLGAP1 antisense RNA 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase pseudogene 66; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DLGAP1 antisense RNA 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
peptidylprolyl isomerase A (cyclophilin A) pseudogene 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromosome 18 open reading frame 42; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 526; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 667; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 3 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
uncharacterized LOC645355; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3976; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protein 200C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
l(3)mbt-like 4 (Drosophila); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U5F small nuclear 3, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 4317; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L6 pseudogene 27; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromosome 18 open reading frame 64; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Rho GTPase activating protein 28; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 668; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
sex comb on midleg-like 2 (Drosophila) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
laminin, alpha 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 25, member 51 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
leucine rich repeat containing 30; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, M; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
uncharacterized LOC100192426; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ring finger and WD repeat domain 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
thymocyte selection associated family member 3, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
aldo-keto reductase family 1, member B1 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RAB12, member RAS oncogene family; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
SOGA family member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein S4X pseudogene 19; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) flavoprotein 2, 24kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ankyrin repeat domain 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
twisted gastrulation BMP signaling modulator 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ralA binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
protein phosphatase 4, regulatory subunit 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
keratin 18 pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RAB31, member RAS oncogene family; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger protein 415 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 449; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
thioredoxin domain containing 2 (spermatozoa); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
VAMP (vesicle-associated membrane protein)-associated protein A, 33kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 450; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
adenomatosis polyposis coli down-regulated 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein, gamma; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain containing 58 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
phosphomannomutase 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
family with sequence similarity 38, member A pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
KIAA0895-like pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 41 (magnesium transporter), member 2 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 35, member G4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
nuclear pore complex interacting protein family, member B1, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA mir-7153; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), alpha activating activity polypeptide, olfactory type; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
asparagine synthetase (glutamine-hydrolyzing) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
charged multivesicular body protein 1B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
metallophosphoesterase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
inositol(myo)-1(or 4)-monophosphatase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
single stranded DNA binding protein 4 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
G protein-coupled receptor 125 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 2 (p49/p100) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ankyrin repeat domain 62; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit D, integral membrane protein pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
phosphomannomutase 2 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC497259; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain containing 58 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cell death-inducing DFFA-like effector a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
tubulin, beta 6 class V; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
AFG3-like AAA ATPase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
slowmo homolog 1 (Drosophila); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
spire-type actin nucleation factor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
high mobility group box 3 pseudogene 28; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CLAST3; HCCA3; HsT1707; MDS003; PAC2; TNFSF5IP1
proteasome (prosome, macropain) assembly chaperone 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
centrosomal protein 76kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
serine/threonine kinase 25 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SEH1-like (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
centrosomal protein 192kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
mRNA turnover 4 homolog (S. cerevisiae) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
WD repeat domain 89 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
LDLRAD4 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 5190; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 4526; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
family with sequence similarity 210, member A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA (guanine-7-) methyltransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
melanocortin 5 receptor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
melanocortin 2 receptor (adrenocorticotropic hormone); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L36a pseudogene 49; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
non-SMC element 4 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
vomeronasal 1 receptor 73 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 519; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
neurofibromin 1 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ankyrin repeat domain 20 family, member A5, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ras homolog family member T1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
sorting nexin 18 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily F, polypeptide 35, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger protein 114 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
family with sequence similarity 207, member A pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
telomeric repeat binding factor (NIMA-interacting) 1 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
fem-1 homolog a (C. elegans) pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
GRAM domain containing 4 pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
POTE ankyrin domain family, member C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor, family 4, subfamily K, member 7 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor, family 4, subfamily K, member 8 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
sorting nexin 19 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
vomeronasal 1 receptor 74 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ankyrin repeat domain 30B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 3156-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
fibroblast growth factor 7 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC400644; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 9 open reading frame 172 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromosome 9 open reading frame 86 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19kDa interacting protein 3 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 138 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
vomeronasal 1 receptor 75 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ankyrin repeat domain 30B pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L21 pseudogene 128; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
endo/exonuclease (5'-3'), endonuclease G-like pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
growth regulation by estrogen in breast cancer-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
establishment of sister chromatid cohesion N-acetyltransferase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein D1 polypeptide 16kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
abhydrolase domain containing 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 320c-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mindbomb E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 133a-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 1-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L34 pseudogene 32; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 451; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, U7 small nuclear 17 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
GATA6 antisense RNA 1 (head to head); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
GATA binding protein 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cutaneous T-cell lymphoma-associated antigen 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S4X pseudogene 18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
retinoblastoma binding protein 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 4741; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Cdk5 and Abl enzyme substrate 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transmembrane protein 241; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RIO kinase 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 18 open reading frame 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Niemann-Pick disease, type C1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ankyrin repeat domain 29; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein S10 pseudogene 27; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
laminin, alpha 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L23a pseudogene 77; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 39C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U5A small nuclear 6, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CABYRa; CABYRc; CABYRc/d; CABYRe; CBP86; CT88; FSP-2; FSP2
calcium binding tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
oxysterol binding protein-like 1A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 452; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 320c-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
impact RWD domain protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
AXOR35; BG26; GPCR105; GPRv53; H4; H4R; HH4R
histamine receptor H4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger protein 470 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A3 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC729950; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
WW domain binding protein 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 521; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
synovial sarcoma translocation, chromosome 18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein S24 pseudogene 18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, alpha type, 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
dihydrofolate reductase pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
nucleophosmin 1 (nucleolar phosphoprotein B23, numatrin) pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
TAF4b RNA polymerase II, TATA box binding protein (TBP)-associated factor, 105kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
family with sequence similarity 60, member B pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 347 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA mir-8057; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytokine induced apoptosis inhibitor 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC728606; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin fusion degradation 1 like (yeast) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
aquaporin 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
AQP4 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
carbohydrate (N-acetylgalactosamine 4-0) sulfotransferase 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal 31kDa, V1 subunit E1 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ubiquitin A-52 residue ribosomal protein fusion product 1 pseudogene 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA binding motif protein 22 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
proliferation-associated 2G4 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cadherin 2, type 1, N-cadherin (neuronal); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ariadne homolog 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
heat shock 70kDa protein 9 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 302f; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmocollin 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmocollin 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
desmocollin 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CDHF4; DG1; DSG; EPKHE; EPKHIA; PPKS1; SPPK1
desmoglein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmoglein 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmoglein 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmoglein 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC100652770; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transthyretin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,4- galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
leucine rich repeat containing 37, member A7, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
golgi SNAP receptor complex member 2 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 25, member 52; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
trafficking protein particle complex 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
family with sequence similarity 76, member A pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
phosphogluconate dehydrogenase pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
epsin 2 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ring finger protein 125, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 2 pseudogene 44; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S15a pseudogene 35; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ring finger protein 138, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
meprin A, beta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
clustered mitochondria (cluA/CLU1) homolog pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
GRB2 associated, regulator of MAPK1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
WW domain binding protein 11 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
kelch-like family member 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein S27 pseudogene 28; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
coiled-coil domain containing 178; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
additional sex combs like 3 (Drosophila); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
nucleolar protein 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
dystrobrevin, alpha; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L10a pseudogene 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microtubule-associated protein, RP/EB family, member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
zinc finger protein 397; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 30; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
zinc finger protein 271; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger protein 24; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
zinc finger protein 396; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L7a pseudogene 67; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
INO80 complex subunit C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 3975; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 (GalNAc-T1); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
nuclear receptor binding factor 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 187; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3929; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 18 open reading frame 21; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain containing 1A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 39 (zinc transporter), member 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
molybdenum cofactor sulfurase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U4 small nuclear 3, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
WDR45-like pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
formin homology 2 domain containing 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
KIAA1328; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
CUGBP, Elav-like family member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 4318; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L12 pseudogene 40; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 669; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L7a pseudogene 66; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 924; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 5583-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 5583-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L17 pseudogene 45; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratoconus gene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
nucleophosmin 1 (nucleolar phosphoprotein B23, numatrin) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromosome 15 open reading frame 40 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, catalytic subunit type 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 907; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 454; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Ras-like without CAAX 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
synaptotagmin IV; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
IBTK pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 455; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin 8 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SET binding protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 4319; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 14 (urea transporter), member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
HsT1341; HUT11; JK; RACH1; RACH2; UT-B1; UT1; UTE
solute carrier family 14 (urea transporter), member 1 (Kidd blood group); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ectopic P-granules autophagy protein 5 homolog (C. elegans); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
proline-serine-threonine phosphatase interacting protein 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
UTP18, small subunit (SSU) processome component, homolog (yeast) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ATP5A; ATP5AL2; ATPM; hATP1; HEL-S-123m; MC5DN4; MOM2; OMR; ORM
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, alpha subunit 1, cardiac muscle; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
HAUS augmin-like complex, subunit 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 18 open reading frame 25; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ring finger protein 165; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
lipoxygenase homology domains 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ST8 alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminide alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein S21 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ARIP3; DIP; MIZ; MIZ1; PIASX; PIASX-ALPHA; PIASX-BETA; SIZ2; ZMIZ4
protein inhibitor of activated STAT, 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 4 (proto-oncogene) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
katanin p60 subunit A-like 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transcription elongation factor B polypeptide 3C-like 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transcription elongation factor B polypeptide 3C-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transcription elongation factor B polypeptide 3C (elongin A3); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transcription elongation factor B polypeptide 3B (elongin A2); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
immediate early response 3 interacting protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SKI family transcriptional corepressor 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 4527; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
thiopurine S-methyltransferase pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
hMAD-2; hSMAD2; JV18; JV18-1; MADH2; MADR2
SMAD family member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
MT-CO2 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 456; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide G (32kD) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 4743; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SMAD family member 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
dymeclin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 4744; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proline rich 13 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RPL17-C18orf32 readthrough; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 18 open reading frame 32; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 1539; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 58C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 58A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 58B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
signal recognition particle 72kDa pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
lipase, endothelial; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
single-strand-selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
acetyl-CoA acyltransferase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small Cajal body-specific RNA 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
myosin VB; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 457; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
adenosine deaminase domain containing 1 (testis-specific) pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 4320; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain containing 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
2410002I16Rik; 5830420C16Rik; CFP1; CGBP; hCGBP; HsT2645; PCCX1; PHF18; SPP1; ZCGPC1
CXXC finger protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein, large, P0 pseudogene 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ERK-4; ERK3; Erk4; MAPK 4; p63MAPK; PRKM4
mitogen-activated protein kinase 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
maestro; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A3 pseudogene 16; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L17 pseudogene 46; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
malic enzyme 2, NAD(+)-dependent, mitochondrial; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
elaC ribonuclease Z 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SMAD family member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 10 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
mex-3 RNA binding family member C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC100287225; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
synovial sarcoma translocation gene on chromosome 18-like 2 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
neuroepithelial cell transforming 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal L24 domain containing 1 pseudogene 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
intraflagellar transport 57 homolog (Chlamydomonas) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S8 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
deleted in colorectal carcinoma; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
vomeronasal 1 receptor 76 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L29 pseudogene 32; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 37; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
polymerase (DNA directed) iota; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 18 open reading frame 54; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide G pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
dynactin associated protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RAB27B, member RAS oncogene family; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein SA pseudogene 57; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
coiled-coil domain containing 68; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 459; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
bHLHb19; E2-2; ITF-2; ITF2; PTHS; SEF-2; SEF2; SEF2-1; SEF2-1A; SEF2-1B; SEF2-1D; TCF-4
transcription factor 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 4529; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L21 pseudogene 126; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC100505474; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
thioredoxin-like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
WD repeat domain 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA, regulator of reprogramming; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
biorientation of chromosomes in cell division 1-like 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ST8 alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminide alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
one cut homeobox 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ferrochelatase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
uncharacterized LOC100505549; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8B, member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S17 pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal L24 domain containing 1 pseudogene 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1 pseudogene 30; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
hsa-mir-122; MIR122A; MIRN122; MIRN122A; miRNA122; miRNA122A
microRNA 122; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3591; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
alpha-kinase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L9 pseudogene 31; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation gene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L37 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 532; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
O-acyltransferase like, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SEC11 homolog C (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
signal recognition particle 19kDa pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
gastrin-releasing peptide; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
retina and anterior neural fold homeobox; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
complexin 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ERGIC-53; ERGIC53; F5F8D; FMFD1; gp58; MCFD1; MR60
lectin, mannose-binding, 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collagen and calcium binding EGF domains 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
actin, beta pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S26 pseudogene 54; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
glutamate dehydrogenase 1 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein, large, P0 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate-induced protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
pleckstrin homology domain containing, family B (evectins) member 2 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like 3 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
serologically defined colon cancer antigen 3 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
family with sequence similarity 60, member C pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S3a pseudogene 49; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
general transcription factor IIH, polypeptide 1, 62kDa pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
melanocortin 4 receptor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
dynein, light chain, roadblock-type 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S5 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
testis derived transcript (3 LIM domains) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
C-terminal binding protein 2 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ADP-ribosylation factor-like 14 effector protein pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1 pseudogene 31; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cadherin 20, type 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L30 pseudogene 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
LSM6 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC100996669; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ring finger protein 152; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribose 5-phosphate isomerase A pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class N; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
KIAA1468; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
CD265; FEO; LOH18CR1; ODFR; OFE; OPTB7; OSTS; PDB2; RANK; TRANCER
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11a, NFKB activator; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L17 pseudogene 44; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
actin, beta pseudogene 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
PH domain and leucine rich repeat protein phosphatase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
3-ketodihydrosphingosine reductase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
vacuolar protein sorting 4 homolog B (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit, ATPase, 5 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit C1 (subunit 9) pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
HsT1196; SCC; SCCA-1; SCCA-PD; SCCA1; T4-A
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 11 (gene/pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
histocompatibility (minor) serpin domain containing; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L12 pseudogene 39; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 305; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC284294; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC400654; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cadherin 7, type 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PRPF19 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cadherin 19, type 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 5011; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L31 pseudogene 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
dermatan sulfate epimerase-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC643542; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
family with sequence similarity 32, member D (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
selenocysteine insertion sequence-binding protein 2-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
myotubularin related protein 14 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
aldo-keto reductase family 1, member B10 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
metallothionein-like 3, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
thioredoxin-related transmembrane protein 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
coiled-coil domain containing 102B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 39, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit C pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
aminoacylase 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
docking protein 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CD226 molecule; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
rotatin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
CIS-4; CIS4; HSPC060; SOCS-4; SOCS-6; SOCS4; SSI4; STAI4; STATI4
suppressor of cytokine signaling 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein S2 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Gilles de la Tourette syndrome chromosome region, candidate 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
signal peptide peptidase like 3 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC100505776; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cerebellin 2 precursor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 pseudogene 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
neuropilin (NRP) and tolloid (TLL)-like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 460; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 548av; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC400655; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC100505817; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
F-box protein 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 21 homolog (yeast); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cytochrome b5 type A (microsomal); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
chromosome 18 open reading frame 63; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
FBR-MuSV-associated ubiquitously expressed (fox derived) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
family with sequence similarity 69, member C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
CNDP dipeptidase 2 (metallopeptidase M20 family); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
carnosine dipeptidase 1 (metallopeptidase M20 family); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 909; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger protein 407; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
zinc binding alcohol dehydrogenase domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
teashirt zinc finger homeobox 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
small integral membrane protein 21; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC339298; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger protein 516; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
FLJ44313 protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 908; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ADP-ribosylation factor-like 2 binding protein pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
uncharacterized LOC100131655; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger protein 236; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L26 pseudogene 35; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
exportin, tRNA (nuclear export receptor for tRNAs) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
myelin basic protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
galanin receptor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
B double prime 1 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 8 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1029; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
spalt-like transcription factor 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATPase, class II, type 9B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
CTD (carboxy-terminal domain, RNA polymerase II, polypeptide A) phosphatase, subunit 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
potassium voltage-gated channel, subfamily G, member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PQ loop repeat containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
heat shock factor binding protein 1-like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DIB1; DIM1; HsT161; SNRNP15; TXNL4; U5-15kD
thioredoxin-like 4A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosome binding factor A (putative); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RBFA downstream neighbor (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; adenine nucleotide translocator), member 6 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ADNP homeobox 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
PARD6G antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
par-6 family cell polarity regulator gamma; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Linear centromere model derived predominantly from reads generated in PMID: 17803354. This region does not represent an actual centromere sequence, as long-range ordering of repeats and unmapped WGS contigs is not provided by the model. For details of model production, see http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.0035.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 pseudogene 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 14 (tRNA-guanine transglycosylase), transcript variant 1
ubiquitin specific peptidase 14 (tRNA-guanine transglycosylase), transcript variant 2
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 14 isoform a
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 14 isoform b
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_130386.2
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_569057.1
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collectin sub-family member 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_004066.1
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions and 2 indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
clusterin-like 1 (retinal), transcript variant 3
clusterin-like 1 (retinal), transcript variant 1
clusterin-like 1 (retinal), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
clusterin-like 1 (retinal), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 18 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
clusterin-like 1 (retinal), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
clusterin-like 1 (retinal), transcript variant 2
clusterin-like 1 (retinal), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
isoform b precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
clusterin-like protein 1 isoform b precursor
isoform b precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
putative uncharacterized protein C18orf56
enolase superfamily member 1, transcript variant 2
enolase superfamily member 1, transcript variant 1
enolase superfamily member 1, transcript variant 3
enolase superfamily member 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 69 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
enolase superfamily member 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
enolase superfamily member 1, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 42 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
enolase superfamily member 1, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 42 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
enolase superfamily member 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 51 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
enolase superfamily member 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
enolase superfamily member 1, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
enolase superfamily member 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 44 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform rTSbeta is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial enolase superfamily member 1 isoform rTSbeta
isoform rTSgamma is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial enolase superfamily member 1 isoform rTSgamma
isoform rTSalpha is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial enolase superfamily member 1 isoform rTSalpha
mitochondrial enolase superfamily member 1 isoform X8
v-yes-1 Yamaguchi sarcoma viral oncogene homolog 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 150 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
v-yes-1 Yamaguchi sarcoma viral oncogene homolog 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_005433.3
adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide 1 (pituitary), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 44 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide isoform X1
adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide 1 (pituitary), transcript variant 1
adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide 1 (pituitary), transcript variant 2
pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide preproprotein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 470, transcript variant 3
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 470, transcript variant 4
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 470, transcript variant 2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 470, transcript variant 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 17% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
methyltransferase like 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 49 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyltransferase like 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyltransferase like 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyltransferase-like protein 4 isoform X3
methyltransferase-like protein 4 isoform X5
methyltransferase like 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyltransferase-like protein 4 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins
structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain containing 1
structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 49 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain-containing protein 1
structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 156 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 152 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 264 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 259 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 259 ESTs, 19 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 258 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
phosphatidate phosphatase LPIN2 isoform X1
phosphatidate phosphatase LPIN2 isoform X2
phosphatidate phosphatase LPIN2 isoform X3
phosphatidate phosphatase LPIN2 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteine and histidine-rich domain (CHORD) containing 1 pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin, light chain 12A, regulatory, non-sarcomeric, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 345 ESTs, 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin, light chain 12A, regulatory, non-sarcomeric
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_006471.2
myosin, light chain 12A, regulatory, non-sarcomeric, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 337 ESTs, 33 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin, light chain 12A, regulatory, non-sarcomeric, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 355 ESTs, 34 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
myosin regulatory light chain 12A isoform X2
myosin regulatory light chain 12A isoform X1
myosin regulatory light chain 12A isoform X3
myosin, light chain 12B, regulatory, transcript variant 2
myosin, light chain 12B, regulatory, transcript variant 1
myosin, light chain 12B, regulatory, transcript variant 3
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1, transcript variant 8
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1, transcript variant 11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1, transcript variant 2
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 100 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1, transcript variant 9
isoform e is encoded by transcript variant 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1, transcript variant 3
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1, transcript variant 10
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1, transcript variant 5
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1, transcript variant 4
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1, transcript variant 1
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1, transcript variant 6
TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1, transcript variant 7
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC100505592, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100505592, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC100505592, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 56 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant 1
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant 4
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant 5
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 45 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant X7
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 46 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 51 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant 6
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 45 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant 2
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant 8
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform 1
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform X1
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform X2
isoform 4 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform 4
isoform 5 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform 5
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform X3
isoform 6 is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform 6
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform X5
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform X7
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform X4
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform X6
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform 2
isoform 8 is encoded by transcript variant 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform 8
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant 3
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 1, transcript variant 7
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform 3
isoform 7 is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
disks large-associated protein 1 isoform 7
serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative uncharacterized protein C18orf42
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 526
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 667
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 14, transcript variant 4
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 14, transcript variant 2
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 14, transcript variant 1
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 14, transcript variant 3
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 14
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant 4
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant 1
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant 3
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant 2
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 131 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 121 ESTs, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 121 ESTs, 24 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 123 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 124 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 169 ESTs, 27 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 145 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 132 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 125 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 130 ESTs, 29 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X17
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 114 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 117 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 128 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 129 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 148 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 138 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 142 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 153 ESTs, 23 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 200C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
l(3)mbt-like 4 (Drosophila), transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 29 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
l(3)mbt-like 4 (Drosophila), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 39 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
l(3)mbt-like 4 (Drosophila), transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
l(3)mbt-like 4 (Drosophila), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X5
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X2
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X6
l(3)mbt-like 4 (Drosophila), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X4
l(3)mbt-like 4 (Drosophila), transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X7
l(3)mbt-like 4 (Drosophila), transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X9
l(3)mbt-like 4 (Drosophila), transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 4 isoform X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, and 37% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative uncharacterized protein LOC100130480
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 28, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 83 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 28, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 77 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho GTPase activating protein 28, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 24 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
rho GTPase-activating protein 28 isoform X1
rho GTPase-activating protein 28 isoform X3
rho GTPase-activating protein 28 isoform X2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 668
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 30
protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, M, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 156 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, M, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 169 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, M, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 159 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, M, transcript variant 1
protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, M, transcript variant 2
protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, M, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase mu isoform X1
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase mu isoform X2
isoform 1 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase mu isoform 1 precursor
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase mu isoform X3
isoform 2 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase mu isoform 2 precursor
protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, M, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 152 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase mu isoform X4
RAB12, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SOGA family member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 60 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SOGA family member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 64 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SOGA family member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SOGA family member 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 57 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SOGA family member 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) flavoprotein 2, 24kDa
NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) flavoprotein 2, 24kDa, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 81 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 2, mitochondrial precursor
uncharacterized LOC101927275, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927275, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927275, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927275, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 12, transcript variant 1
ankyrin repeat domain 12, transcript variant 2
ankyrin repeat domain 12, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 199 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 12, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 195 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 12, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 191 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 12, transcript variant 3
ankyrin repeat domain 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 192 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain 12, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 190 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 12 isoform 1
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 12 isoform X1
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 12 isoform X2
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 12 isoform X3
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 12 isoform X4
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 12 isoform 2
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 12 isoform X5
ankyrin repeat domain 12, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 179 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 12 isoform X6
uncharacterized LOC102724397, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102724397, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
twisted gastrulation BMP signaling modulator 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_020648.5
The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions and 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
twisted gastrulation protein homolog 1 precursor
ralA binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 169 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ralA binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 166 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein phosphatase 4, regulatory subunit 1, transcript variant 3
protein phosphatase 4, regulatory subunit 1, transcript variant 2
protein phosphatase 4, regulatory subunit 1, transcript variant 1
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 4 regulatory subunit 1 isoform b
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 4 regulatory subunit 1 isoform a
protein phosphatase 4, regulatory subunit 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 98 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927323, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC101927323, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927323, transcript variant X2
thioredoxin domain containing 2 (spermatozoa), transcript variant 2
thioredoxin domain containing 2 (spermatozoa), transcript variant 1
thioredoxin domain containing 2 (spermatozoa), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
thioredoxin domain containing 2 (spermatozoa), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
thioredoxin domain containing 2 (spermatozoa), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
thioredoxin domain-containing protein 2 isoform 2
thioredoxin domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
thioredoxin domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
thioredoxin domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
thioredoxin domain-containing protein 2 isoform 1
VAMP (vesicle-associated membrane protein)-associated protein A, 33kDa, transcript variant 1
VAMP (vesicle-associated membrane protein)-associated protein A, 33kDa, transcript variant 2
vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein A isoform 1
vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein A isoform 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 34% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
adenomatosis polyposis coli down-regulated 1
N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein, gamma
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, and 4% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 2
uncharacterized LOC101927433, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC101927433, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
putative solute carrier family 35 member G4
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), alpha activating activity polypeptide, olfactory type, transcript variant 1
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), alpha activating activity polypeptide, olfactory type, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 85 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), alpha activating activity polypeptide, olfactory type, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(olf) subunit alpha isoform 1
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(olf) subunit alpha isoform X3
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), alpha activating activity polypeptide, olfactory type, transcript variant 3
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), alpha activating activity polypeptide, olfactory type, transcript variant 4
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), alpha activating activity polypeptide, olfactory type, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 124 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(olf) subunit alpha isoform 2
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(olf) subunit alpha isoform X2
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), alpha activating activity polypeptide, olfactory type, transcript variant 5
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(olf) subunit alpha isoform 3
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant 2
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant 5
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant 1
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant 3
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant 4
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 88 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 83 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 95 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 161 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 162 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 92 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 94 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 96 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
metallophosphoesterase 1, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 93 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927511, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC101927511, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC101927511, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC101927511, transcript variant X3
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 62
ankyrin repeat domain 62, transcript variant 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 62 isoform 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 Proteins
cell death-inducing DFFA-like effector a, transcript variant 1
cell death-inducing DFFA-like effector a, transcript variant 2
cell death-inducing DFFA-like effector a, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tubulin, beta 6 class V, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 152 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_032525.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
slowmo homolog 1 (Drosophila), transcript variant 1
slowmo homolog 1 (Drosophila), transcript variant 2
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
spire-type actin nucleation factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 200 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
spire-type actin nucleation factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 205 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
spire-type actin nucleation factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 174 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
spire-type actin nucleation factor 1, transcript variant 2
spire-type actin nucleation factor 1, transcript variant 1
spire-type actin nucleation factor 1, transcript variant 3
spire-type actin nucleation factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 163 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
proteasome (prosome, macropain) assembly chaperone 2, transcript variant 2
centrosomal protein 76kDa, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 76kDa, transcript variant 3
centrosomal protein of 76 kDa isoform X1
centrosomal protein 76kDa, transcript variant 2
centrosomal protein 76kDa, transcript variant 1
centrosomal protein 76kDa, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 76kDa, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 76kDa, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein of 76 kDa isoform X2
centrosomal protein of 76 kDa isoform X3
centrosomal protein of 76 kDa isoform X4
proteasome (prosome, macropain) assembly chaperone 2, transcript variant 1
proteasome assembly chaperone 2 isoform 1
proteasome assembly chaperone 2 isoform 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 46 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 2, transcript variant 3
protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 2, transcript variant 2
protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 2, transcript variant 4
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 2 isoform 3
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 2 isoform 2
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 2 isoform 4
protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 2, transcript variant 1
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 2 isoform X2
protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 45 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 31 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 2 isoform 1
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 2 isoform X1
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 2 isoform X4
tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 2 isoform X3
SEH1-like (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 2
SEH1-like (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 1
SEH1-like (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEH1-like (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
SEH1-like (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 93 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 84 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 85 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 76 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 92 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein of 192 kDa isoform X1
centrosomal protein of 192 kDa isoform X3
centrosomal protein of 192 kDa isoform X7
centrosomal protein of 192 kDa isoform X10
centrosomal protein of 192 kDa isoform X2
centrosomal protein of 192 kDa isoform X6
centrosomal protein of 192 kDa isoform X12
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X9
centrosomal protein of 192 kDa isoform X8
centrosomal protein of 192 kDa isoform X9
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 83 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein of 192 kDa isoform X4
centrosomal protein 192kDa, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 83 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
centrosomal protein of 192 kDa isoform X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 5% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 142 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant X2
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant a2
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 144 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 148 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 142 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant a1
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 142 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 144 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform X1
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform X2
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform X3
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform X4
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform X5
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform X6
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform X7
isoform alpha 1 is encoded by transcript variant a1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform alpha 1
isoform alpha 2 is encoded by transcript variant a2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform alpha 2
uncharacterized LOC102724634, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102724634, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC102724634, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC102724634, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC102724615, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102724615, transcript variant X2
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant c1
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant c2
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant d1
isoform gamma 1 is encoded by transcript variant c1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform gamma 1
isoform gamma 2 is encoded by transcript variant c2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform gamma 2
isoform delta 1 is encoded by transcript variant d1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform delta 1
low density lipoprotein receptor class A domain containing 4, transcript variant e1
isoform epsilon 1 is encoded by transcript variant e1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain-containing protein 4 isoform epsilon 1
family with sequence similarity 210, member A, transcript variant 2
family with sequence similarity 210, member A, transcript variant 1
family with sequence similarity 210, member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA (guanine-7-) methyltransferase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 120 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA (guanine-7-) methyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 91 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_003799.1
The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA (guanine-7-) methyltransferase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 91 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
mRNA cap guanine-N7 methyltransferase isoform X1
mRNA cap guanine-N7 methyltransferase isoform X4
mRNA cap guanine-N7 methyltransferase isoform X3
melanocortin 2 receptor (adrenocorticotropic hormone)
zinc finger protein 519, transcript variant 2
zinc finger protein 519, transcript variant 1
zinc finger protein 519, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ankyrin repeat domain 20 family, member A5, pseudogene
cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily F, polypeptide 35, pseudogene
coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor pseudogene 3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_024076.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ankyrin repeat domain 30B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 30B isoform X1
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 30B
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_027417.1
Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
growth regulation by estrogen in breast cancer-like
uncharacterized LOC101927521, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC101927521, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC101927521, transcript variant X1
growth regulation by estrogen in breast cancer-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
growth regulation by estrogen in breast cancer-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 36 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
establishment of sister chromatid cohesion N-acetyltransferase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 88 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
establishment of sister chromatid cohesion N-acetyltransferase 1
establishment of sister chromatid cohesion N-acetyltransferase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 55 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein D1 polypeptide 16kDa
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_006938.2
The RefSeq transcript aligns at 99% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
abhydrolase domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 93 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
abhydrolase domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 121 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 49% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
GATA binding protein 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 66 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cutaneous T-cell lymphoma-associated antigen 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_172241.2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
retinoblastoma binding protein 8, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 88 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoblastoma binding protein 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 93 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoblastoma binding protein 8, transcript variant X6
retinoblastoma binding protein 8, transcript variant 1
retinoblastoma binding protein 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 105 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoblastoma binding protein 8, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91 ESTs, 16 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
retinoblastoma binding protein 8, transcript variant 3
retinoblastoma binding protein 8, transcript variant 2
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
retinoblastoma binding protein 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 72 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Cdk5 and Abl enzyme substrate 1, transcript variant 4
Cdk5 and Abl enzyme substrate 1, transcript variant 3
Cdk5 and Abl enzyme substrate 1, transcript variant 2
Cdk5 and Abl enzyme substrate 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 104 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDK5 and ABL1 enzyme substrate 1 isoform 2
CDK5 and ABL1 enzyme substrate 1 isoform X1
Cdk5 and Abl enzyme substrate 1, transcript variant 1
CDK5 and ABL1 enzyme substrate 1 isoform 1
Cdk5 and Abl enzyme substrate 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 102 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CDK5 and ABL1 enzyme substrate 1 isoform X2
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CDK5 and ABL1 enzyme substrate 1 isoform 3
transmembrane protein 241, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 241, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 241, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 241, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 241, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 241, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 18 open reading frame 8, transcript variant 1
chromosome 18 open reading frame 8, transcript variant 2
chromosome 18 open reading frame 8, transcript variant 4
chromosome 18 open reading frame 8, transcript variant 3
chromosome 18 open reading frame 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 81 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein C18orf8 isoform 1
uncharacterized protein C18orf8 isoform X1
uncharacterized protein C18orf8 isoform 2
Niemann-Pick disease, type C1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 173 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Niemann-Pick disease, type C1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 163 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Niemann-Pick disease, type C1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 175 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Niemann-Pick disease, type C1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 255 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_173505.2
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 29
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_198129.1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001127717.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_937762.1
isoform 1 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
laminin subunit alpha-3 isoform 1 precursor
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001121189.1
isoform 3 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
laminin subunit alpha-3 isoform 3 precursor
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_000227.3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001127718.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_000218.2
isoform 2 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
laminin subunit alpha-3 isoform 2 precursor
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001121190.1
isoform 4 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 4; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
laminin subunit alpha-3 isoform 4 precursor
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 39C, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_153211.3
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 39C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 39C, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001135993.1
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 39C, transcript variant 3
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 39C isoform 1
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 39C isoform X2
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 39C isoform 3
tetratricopeptide repeat domain 39C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 39C isoform 2
tetratricopeptide repeat protein 39C isoform X1
calcium binding tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated, transcript variant 1
calcium binding tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated, transcript variant 7
calcium binding tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated, transcript variant 6
calcium binding tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated, transcript variant 2
calcium binding tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated, transcript variant 5
calcium binding tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 19 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium binding tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 39 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium binding tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium binding tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated, transcript variant 3
calcium-binding tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated protein isoform c
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform e is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
calcium-binding tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated protein isoform e
calcium-binding tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated protein isoform X3
calcium-binding tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated protein isoform a
calcium-binding tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated protein isoform b
calcium-binding tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated protein isoform d
calcium-binding tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated protein isoform X1
calcium-binding tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated protein isoform X2
oxysterol binding protein-like 1A, transcript variant 2
oxysterol binding protein-like 1A, transcript variant 3
oxysterol binding protein-like 1A, transcript variant 1
oxysterol binding protein-like 1A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 133 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
oxysterol binding protein-like 1A, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 117 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
oxysterol binding protein-like 1A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 119 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
oxysterol binding protein-like 1A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 145 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
oxysterol-binding protein-related protein 1 isoform X1
oxysterol-binding protein-related protein 1 isoform X3
oxysterol-binding protein-related protein 1 isoform X4
oxysterol-binding protein-related protein 1 isoform X2
oxysterol-binding protein-related protein 1 isoform 2
oxysterol-binding protein-related protein 1 isoform 3
oxysterol-binding protein-related protein 1 isoform 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_018439.3
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_060909.1
histamine receptor H4, transcript variant 1
histamine receptor H4, transcript variant 3
histamine receptor H4, transcript variant 2
zinc finger protein 521, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 82 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 521, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 78 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 521, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
synovial sarcoma translocation, chromosome 18, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 176 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
synovial sarcoma translocation, chromosome 18, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_005637.2
synovial sarcoma translocation, chromosome 18, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001007559.1
synovial sarcoma translocation, chromosome 18, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 168 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, alpha type, 8, transcript variant 1
proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, alpha type, 8, transcript variant 2
proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, alpha type, 8, transcript variant 3
proteasome subunit alpha type-7-like isoform 1
proteasome subunit alpha type-7-like isoform 2
proteasome subunit alpha type-7-like isoform 3
proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, alpha type, 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
proteasome subunit alpha type-7-like isoform X1
TAF4b RNA polymerase II, TATA box binding protein (TBP)-associated factor, 105kDa
TAF4b RNA polymerase II, TATA box binding protein (TBP)-associated factor, 105kDa, transcript variant X4
TAF4b RNA polymerase II, TATA box binding protein (TBP)-associated factor, 105kDa, transcript variant X2
TAF4b RNA polymerase II, TATA box binding protein (TBP)-associated factor, 105kDa, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 4B
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 4B isoform X4
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 4B isoform X2
transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 4B isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 1, transcript variant 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001258222.1
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 1, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_198991.3
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 1, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001258221.1
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 1, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001136205.2
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 1, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001142730.2
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD1 isoform c
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD1 isoform b
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD1 isoform a
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD1 isoform X1
prostate cancer associated transcript 18 (non-protein coding)
uncharacterized LOC101927652, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC101927652, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC101927652, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC101927652, transcript variant X4
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
carbohydrate (N-acetylgalactosamine 4-0) sulfotransferase 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
carbohydrate (N-acetylgalactosamine 4-0) sulfotransferase 9, transcript variant 3
carbohydrate (N-acetylgalactosamine 4-0) sulfotransferase 9, transcript variant 1
carbohydrate sulfotransferase 9 isoform 1
carbohydrate sulfotransferase 9 isoform X1
carbohydrate sulfotransferase 9 isoform 2
carbohydrate (N-acetylgalactosamine 4-0) sulfotransferase 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
carbohydrate sulfotransferase 9 isoform X2
cadherin 2, type 1, N-cadherin (neuronal)
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001792.3
cadherin 2, type 1, N-cadherin (neuronal), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 168 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cadherin 2, type 1, N-cadherin (neuronal), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 176 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
cadherin-2 preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform Dsc3a preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant Dsc3a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmocollin-3 isoform Dsc3a preproprotein
isoform Dsc3b preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant Dsc3b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmocollin-3 isoform Dsc3b preproprotein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 77 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform Dsc2a preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant Dsc2a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmocollin-2 isoform Dsc2a preproprotein
isoform Dsc2b preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant Dsc2b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmocollin-2 isoform Dsc2b preproprotein
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform Dsc1a preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant Dsc1a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmocollin-1 isoform Dsc1a preproprotein
isoform Dsc1b preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant Dsc1b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmocollin-1 isoform Dsc1b preproprotein
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001942.2
desmoglein-1 preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC101927718, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927718, transcript variant X1
isoform 2 preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 1 preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmoglein-3 preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
desmoglein-2 preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,4- galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 6
UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,4- galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,4- galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,4- galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 6 isoform X1
beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 6 isoform X2
beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 6 isoform X3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_014939.3
trafficking protein particle complex 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 116 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 125 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 100 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_055754.2
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 8
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 8 isoform X2
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 8 isoform X1
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 8 isoform X3
trafficking protein particle complex 8, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
trafficking protein particle complex subunit 8 isoform X4
ring finger protein 125, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase
ring finger protein 138, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant 1
ring finger protein 138, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 301 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 138, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 190 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 138, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 141 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 138, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant 3
ring finger protein 138, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant 2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF138 isoform 1
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF138 isoform 2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF138 isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF138 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
GRB2 associated, regulator of MAPK1, transcript variant 2
GRB2 associated, regulator of MAPK1, transcript variant 1
GRB2-associated and regulator of MAPK protein isoform 2
GRB2-associated and regulator of MAPK protein isoform 1
WW domain binding protein 11 pseudogene 1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_003558.1
kelch-like family member 14, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 35 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 178, transcript variant 2
coiled-coil domain containing 178, transcript variant 1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 178 isoform 2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 178 isoform 1
additional sex combs like 3 (Drosophila)
additional sex combs like 3 (Drosophila), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 57 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
putative Polycomb group protein ASXL3 isoform X1
nucleolar protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 82 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleolar protein 4, transcript variant 4
nucleolar protein 4, transcript variant 2
nucleolar protein 4, transcript variant 1
nucleolar protein 4, transcript variant 3
nucleolar protein 4, transcript variant 6
nucleolar protein 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 81 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
nucleolar protein 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 53 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
nucleolar protein 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 47 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleolar protein 4, transcript variant 5
nucleolar protein 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
nucleolar protein 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 52 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 2
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 5
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 17
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 7
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 101 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 11
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 12
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 10
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 9
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 132 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 78 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 75 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X28
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 142 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 85 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 76 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X29
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 75 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X30
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 142 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 76 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 143 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 78 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 145 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 80 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 147 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 79 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 135 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 78 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 145 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 79 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X33
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 57 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X34
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 58 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X39
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 62 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 139 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 4
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 13
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 1
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 3
isoform 10 is encoded by transcript variant 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 11 is encoded by transcript variant 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 12 is encoded by transcript variant 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 13 is encoded by transcript variant 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 17 is encoded by transcript variant 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 9 is encoded by transcript variant 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 15
isoform 15 is encoded by transcript variant 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 14
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 16
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 6
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant 8
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X37
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 84 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 68 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X35
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 50 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 61 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dystrobrevin, alpha, transcript variant X36
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 64 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform 14 is encoded by transcript variant 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 16 is encoded by transcript variant 16; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
microtubule-associated protein, RP/EB family, member 2, transcript variant 2
microtubule-associated protein, RP/EB family, member 2, transcript variant 3
microtubule-associated protein RP/EB family member 2 isoform 3
microtubule-associated protein, RP/EB family, member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 292 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
microtubule-associated protein RP/EB family member 2 isoform X1
microtubule-associated protein, RP/EB family, member 2, transcript variant 1
microtubule-associated protein, RP/EB family, member 2, transcript variant 4
microtubule-associated protein RP/EB family member 2 isoform 1
microtubule-associated protein RP/EB family member 2 isoform 4
microtubule-associated protein, RP/EB family, member 2, transcript variant 5
microtubule-associated protein RP/EB family member 2 isoform 2
zinc finger protein 397, transcript variant 2
zinc finger protein 397, transcript variant 1
zinc finger protein 397, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 397, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 30, transcript variant 3
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 30, transcript variant 2
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 30, transcript variant 1
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 30, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 72 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 30, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 68 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 30, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 61 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and SCAN domain-containing protein 30 isoform 1
zinc finger and SCAN domain-containing protein 30 isoform X1
zinc finger and SCAN domain-containing protein 30 isoform X2
zinc finger and SCAN domain-containing protein 30 isoform X3
zinc finger and SCAN domain-containing protein 30 isoform 2
zinc finger protein 271, transcript variant 1
zinc finger protein 271, transcript variant 2
zinc finger protein 24, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 263 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 24, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 82 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 396, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 396, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 396, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
INO80 complex subunit C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 24% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
INO80 complex subunit C, transcript variant 2
INO80 complex subunit C, transcript variant 1
INO80 complex subunit C, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
INO80 complex subunit C, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 (GalNAc-T1), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 265 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 (GalNAc-T1)
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1
polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 isoform X1
chromosome 18 open reading frame 21, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 43 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 18 open reading frame 21, transcript variant 3
chromosome 18 open reading frame 21, transcript variant 2
chromosome 18 open reading frame 21, transcript variant 1
chromosome 18 open reading frame 21, transcript variant 4
chromosome 18 open reading frame 21, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain containing 1A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 265 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain containing 1A
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_018170.3
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain-containing protein 1A
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain-containing protein 1A isoform X3
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain containing 1A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 158 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain-containing protein 1A isoform X2
solute carrier family 39 (zinc transporter), member 6, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_012319.3
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_036451.3
zinc transporter ZIP6 isoform 1 precursor
solute carrier family 39 (zinc transporter), member 6, transcript variant 2
elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 1
elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 2
elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 3
elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 4
elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 5
elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 7
elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 6
elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 152 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant 3
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant 1
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant 2
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 67 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 57 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 58 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 59 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 67 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 58 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 60 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 59 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 59 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
formin homology 2 domain containing 3, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 67 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform 3
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X12
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X4
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X13
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X5
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X7
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform 1
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X8
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform 2
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X10
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X11
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 isoform X6
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 247 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 9
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2 isoform 9
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 97 ESTs, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 8
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 4
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 6
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2 isoform X1
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2 isoform 4
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2 isoform 6
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2 isoform 8
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 3
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 2
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 1
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2 isoform 3
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2 isoform 2
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2 isoform 1
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 7
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2, transcript variant 5
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2 isoform 7
tubulin polyglutamylase complex subunit 2 isoform 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein KIAA1328 isoform X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein KIAA1328 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein KIAA1328 isoform X8
uncharacterized protein KIAA1328 isoform X3
uncharacterized protein KIAA1328 isoform X4
uncharacterized protein KIAA1328 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized protein KIAA1328 isoform X7
CUGBP, Elav-like family member 4, transcript variant 4
CUGBP, Elav-like family member 4, transcript variant 3
CUGBP, Elav-like family member 4, transcript variant 2
CUGBP, Elav-like family member 4, transcript variant 1
CUGBP, Elav-like family member 4, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 140 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
CUGBP, Elav-like family member 4, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 143 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CUGBP, Elav-like family member 4, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 147 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CUGBP, Elav-like family member 4, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 144 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CUGBP, Elav-like family member 4, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 134 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CUGBP, Elav-like family member 4, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 77 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CUGBP, Elav-like family member 4, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 78 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 isoform X14
CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 isoform X13
CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 isoform X11
CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 isoform X12
CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 isoform 4
CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 isoform 3
CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 isoform X9
CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 isoform 2
CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 isoform 1
CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 isoform X10
CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 isoform X15
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 669
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_002838.1
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, catalytic subunit type 3
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 3
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 907, transcript variant 1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 907, transcript variant 2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 907, transcript variant 5
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 907, transcript variant 4
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 907, transcript variant 6
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 907, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_046455.1
The RefSeq transcript has 14 substitutions and 5 indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Ras-like without CAAX 2, transcript variant 1
Ras-like without CAAX 2, transcript variant 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
SET binding protein 1, transcript variant 2
SET binding protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 103 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET binding protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 101 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET binding protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SET binding protein 1, transcript variant 1
uncharacterized LOC101927961, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC101927961, transcript variant X2
solute carrier family 14 (urea transporter), member 2, transcript variant 2
uncharacterized LOC101927980, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927980, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC101927980, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 34% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
solute carrier family 14 (urea transporter), member 2, transcript variant 1
solute carrier family 14 (urea transporter), member 1 (Kidd blood group), transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 71 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 14 (urea transporter), member 1 (Kidd blood group), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 75 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 14 (urea transporter), member 1 (Kidd blood group), transcript variant 1
solute carrier family 14 (urea transporter), member 1 (Kidd blood group), transcript variant 3
solute carrier family 14 (urea transporter), member 1 (Kidd blood group), transcript variant 2
solute carrier family 14 (urea transporter), member 1 (Kidd blood group), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 14 (urea transporter), member 1 (Kidd blood group), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 68 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 14 (urea transporter), member 1 (Kidd blood group), transcript variant 4
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ectopic P-granules autophagy protein 5 homolog (C. elegans), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 29 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ectopic P granules protein 5 homolog isoform X3
sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin 15 precursor
sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 15, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin 15 isoform X1
ectopic P-granules autophagy protein 5 homolog (C. elegans), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 106 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectopic P-granules autophagy protein 5 homolog (C. elegans), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 105 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectopic P-granules autophagy protein 5 homolog (C. elegans)
ectopic P-granules autophagy protein 5 homolog (C. elegans), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 106 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ectopic P granules protein 5 homolog isoform X4
ectopic P granules protein 5 homolog isoform X1
ectopic P granules protein 5 homolog isoform X2
proline-serine-threonine phosphatase interacting protein 2
proline-serine-threonine phosphatase-interacting protein 2
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, alpha subunit 1, cardiac muscle, transcript variant 1
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, alpha subunit 1, cardiac muscle, transcript variant 3
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, alpha subunit 1, cardiac muscle, transcript variant 2
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, alpha subunit 1, cardiac muscle, transcript variant 4
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, alpha subunit 1, cardiac muscle, transcript variant 5
isoform b precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP synthase subunit alpha, mitochondrial isoform b precursor
isoform a precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP synthase subunit alpha, mitochondrial isoform a precursor
isoform a precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP synthase subunit alpha, mitochondrial isoform c
transfer RNA lysine 4 (anticodon CUU); tRNA features were annotated by tRNAscan-SE; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
HAUS augmin-like complex, subunit 1, transcript variant 2
HAUS augmin-like complex, subunit 1, transcript variant 1
chromosome 18 open reading frame 25, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_145055.3
chromosome 18 open reading frame 25, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001008239.2
uncharacterized protein C18orf25 isoform a
uncharacterized protein C18orf25 isoform b
ring finger protein 165, transcript variant 1
ring finger protein 165, transcript variant 2
ring finger protein 165, transcript variant 3
ring finger protein 165, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 34 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
lipoxygenase homology domains 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
lipoxygenase homology domains 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
lipoxygenase homology domains 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
lipoxygenase homology domains 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lipoxygenase homology domains 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
lipoxygenase homology domains 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
lipoxygenase homology domains 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lipoxygenase homology domains 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lipoxygenase homology domains 1, transcript variant 2
lipoxygenase homology domains 1, transcript variant 4
lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform 2
lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform 4
lipoxygenase homology domains 1, transcript variant 1
lipoxygenase homology domains 1, transcript variant 3
lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform 1
lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X8
lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X6
lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform X7
lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform 3
ST8 alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminide alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 5
ST8 alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminide alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST8 alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminide alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ST8 alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminide alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 8E isoform X2
alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 8E isoform X1
alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 8E isoform X3
protein inhibitor of activated STAT, 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 92 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein inhibitor of activated STAT, 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 95 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
protein inhibitor of activated STAT, 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 93 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein inhibitor of activated STAT, 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 132 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein inhibitor of activated STAT, 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 95 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein inhibitor of activated STAT, 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein inhibitor of activated STAT, 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein inhibitor of activated STAT, 2, transcript variant beta
isoform beta is encoded by transcript variant beta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E3 SUMO-protein ligase PIAS2 isoform beta
protein inhibitor of activated STAT, 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 60 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
protein inhibitor of activated STAT, 2, transcript variant alpha
E3 SUMO-protein ligase PIAS2 isoform X10
isoform alpha is encoded by transcript variant alpha; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E3 SUMO-protein ligase PIAS2 isoform alpha
katanin p60 subunit A-like 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
katanin p60 subunit A-like 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 30 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
katanin p60 subunit A-like 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 2 isoform X1
katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 2 isoform X2
katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 2 isoform X6
transcription elongation factor B polypeptide 3C-like 2
RNA polymerase II transcription factor SIII subunit A3-like-2
transcription elongation factor B polypeptide 3C-like
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001100817.1
The RefSeq transcript aligns at 74% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001094287.1
The RefSeq protein aligns at 74% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA polymerase II transcription factor SIII subunit A3-like-1
RNA polymerase II transcription factor SIII subunit A3-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transcription elongation factor B polypeptide 3C (elongin A3)
RNA polymerase II transcription factor SIII subunit A3
transcription elongation factor B polypeptide 3B (elongin A2)
RNA polymerase II transcription factor SIII subunit A2
katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 2
katanin p60 subunit A-like 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 2 isoform X5
haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 181 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain containing 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_032124.4
haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 142 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 142 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain-containing protein 2
haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain-containing protein 2 isoform X5
haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 85 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
immediate early response 3 interacting protein 1
immediate early response 3-interacting protein 1 precursor
SKI family transcriptional corepressor 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 34% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SKI family transcriptional corepressor 2, transcript variant 1
SKI family transcriptional corepressor 2 isoform 1
SKI family transcriptional corepressor 2 isoform X1
SKI family transcriptional corepressor 2, transcript variant 2
SKI family transcriptional corepressor 2 isoform 2
SMAD family member 2, transcript variant 3
SMAD family member 2, transcript variant 2
SMAD family member 2, transcript variant 1
SMAD family member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 128 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
SMAD family member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 118 ESTs, 22 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2 isoform 2
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2 isoform 1
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2 isoform X1
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2 isoform X2
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7C, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 43 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7C, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 43 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7C, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 43 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7C, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 42 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7C, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 42 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7C
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 7C
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 7C isoform X3
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 7C isoform X5
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 7C isoform X6
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 7C isoform X7
zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 7C isoform X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 25% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor, transcript variant 2
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor, transcript variant 1
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor isoform X1
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor isoform X2
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor isoform X3
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor isoform X4
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor isoform X5
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor isoform 2
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor isoform X6
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor isoform X7
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor isoform X8
CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor isoform 1
SMAD family member 7, transcript variant 2
SMAD family member 7, transcript variant 1
SMAD family member 7, transcript variant 3
SMAD family member 7, transcript variant 4
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 7 isoform 2
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 7 isoform 1
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 7 isoform 3
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 7 isoform 4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 209 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 123 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 219 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 208 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 211 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 158 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 146 ESTs, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 145 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RPL17-C18orf32 readthrough, transcript variant 2
RPL17-C18orf32 readthrough, transcript variant 1
chromosome 18 open reading frame 32, transcript variant 1
chromosome 18 open reading frame 32, transcript variant 2
ribosomal protein L17, transcript variant 8
ribosomal protein L17, transcript variant 2
ribosomal protein L17, transcript variant 3
ribosomal protein L17, transcript variant 1
ribosomal protein L17, transcript variant 7
ribosomal protein L17, transcript variant 6
ribosomal protein L17, transcript variant 4
ribosomal protein L17, transcript variant 5
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
lipase, endothelial, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 37 ESTs, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 11
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 11 isoform X1
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 10
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 14
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X23
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X4
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 10
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X36
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X36
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 5
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 2
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 4
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 3
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 11
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 6
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 1
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 12
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 281 ESTs, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 287 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 282 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X33
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 98 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X29
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 101 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 103 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X37
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 93 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 109 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 99 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 99 ESTs, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 100 ESTs, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 100 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 99 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 104 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X37
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X2
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 2
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 6
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X33
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X29
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X27
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X18
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X26
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X16
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X24
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X17
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X15
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 12
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X31
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X25
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X19
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 11
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 9
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 8
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 7
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X35
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 236 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X34
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 241 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 252 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 58 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 63 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X38
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 74 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 58 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X30
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 61 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X28
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 60 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 69 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1, transcript variant 13
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X14
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X12
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X38
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X8
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X32
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X30
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X28
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X20
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X21
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X22
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X5
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 5
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 13
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 4
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X35
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 3
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X34
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 1
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform X11
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 9
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 8
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 1 isoform 7
CXXC finger protein 1, transcript variant 2
CXXC finger protein 1, transcript variant 1
CXXC finger protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 141 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 1, transcript variant 1
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 1, transcript variant 2
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 54% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
spindle and kinetochore-associated protein 1
mitogen-activated protein kinase 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 113 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitogen-activated protein kinase 4 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
malic enzyme 2, NAD(+)-dependent, mitochondrial, transcript variant 1
malic enzyme 2, NAD(+)-dependent, mitochondrial, transcript variant 2
NAD-dependent malic enzyme, mitochondrial isoform 1 precursor
NAD-dependent malic enzyme, mitochondrial isoform 2 precursor
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4
RNA-binding E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MEX3C
uncharacterized LOC100287225, transcript variant 1
uncharacterized LOC100287225, transcript variant 2
deleted in colorectal carcinoma, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 2, transcript variant 1
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 2 isoform 1
methyl-CpG binding domain protein 2, transcript variant 2
testis-specific isoform is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 2 testis-specific isoform
polymerase (DNA directed) iota, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
polymerase (DNA directed) iota, transcript variant X5
polymerase (DNA directed) iota, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 81 ESTs, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
polymerase (DNA directed) iota, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 76 ESTs, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
polymerase (DNA directed) iota, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 78 ESTs, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
polymerase (DNA directed) iota, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 6
chromosome 18 open reading frame 54, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 66 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 18 open reading frame 54, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 64 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 18 open reading frame 54, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome 18 open reading frame 54, transcript variant 1
chromosome 18 open reading frame 54, transcript variant 2
chromosome 18 open reading frame 54, transcript variant 5
chromosome 18 open reading frame 54, transcript variant 3
chromosome 18 open reading frame 54, transcript variant 4
lung adenoma susceptibility protein 2 isoform X1
lung adenoma susceptibility protein 2 isoform a
lung adenoma susceptibility protein 2 isoform b precursor
lung adenoma susceptibility protein 2 isoform X3
lung adenoma susceptibility protein 2 isoform c
lung adenoma susceptibility protein 2 isoform X2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_173629.1
RAB27B, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 63 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RAB27B, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RAB27B, member RAS oncogene family, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 61 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 68, transcript variant 1
coiled-coil domain containing 68, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
coiled-coil domain containing 68, transcript variant 2
coiled-coil domain containing 68, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 68 isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 68
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 68 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transcription factor 4, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001243226.1
transcription factor 4, transcript variant 4
transcription factor 4, transcript variant 5
transcription factor 4, transcript variant 6
transcription factor 4, transcript variant 2
transcription factor 4, transcript variant 1
transcription factor 4, transcript variant 7
transcription factor 4, transcript variant 9
transcription factor 4, transcript variant 8
transcription factor 4, transcript variant 11
transcription factor 4, transcript variant 10
transcription factor 4, transcript variant 12
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X30
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 mRNAs, 648 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X29
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 645 ESTs, 13 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X32
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 666 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X33
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 649 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X31
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 638 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X28
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 646 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X26
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 642 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X27
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 649 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 646 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X25
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 598 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 648 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 650 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 641 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 mRNAs, 650 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X34
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 643 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 647 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 646 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 643 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 641 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 645 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 660 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 646 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X36
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 641 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X35
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 638 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor 4, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 679 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001230155.1
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 3; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform f is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform e is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform g is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform h is encoded by transcript variant 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform i is encoded by transcript variant 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform k is encoded by transcript variant 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform j is encoded by transcript variant 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform l is encoded by transcript variant 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 3% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100505474, transcript variant 2
uncharacterized LOC100505474, transcript variant 1
thioredoxin-like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 176 ESTs, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
thioredoxin-like 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 178 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
thioredoxin-like 1, transcript variant 1
thioredoxin-like 1, transcript variant 2
thioredoxin-like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 128 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat domain 7, transcript variant 1
WD repeat domain 7, transcript variant 2
WD repeat domain 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 122 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat-containing protein 7 isoform 1
WD repeat-containing protein 7 isoform X3
WD repeat-containing protein 7 isoform 2
WD repeat domain 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 117 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat-containing protein 7 isoform X2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA, regulator of reprogramming
biorientation of chromosomes in cell division 1-like 2
putative biorientation of chromosomes in cell division protein 1-like 2
ST8 alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminide alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 3
sia-alpha-2,3-Gal-beta-1,4-GlcNAc-R:alpha 2,8-sialyltransferase
ferrochelatase, mitochondrial isoform b precursor
ferrochelatase, mitochondrial isoform a precursor
asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 615 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
asparagine--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic isoform X1
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8B, member 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_005603.4
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8B, member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 89 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_005594.1
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IC
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IC isoform X1
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8B, member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IC isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 269 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 281 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 269 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 268 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant j
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant d
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant i
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X13
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X14
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X16
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X15
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant j; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform 1
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant d; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform 3
isoform 7 is encoded by transcript variant i; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform 7
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant b
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant k
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant f
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant g
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant h
isoform 4 is encoded by transcript variant g; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform 4
isoform 5 is encoded by transcript variant h; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform 5
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant c
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 283 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant a
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 272 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 272 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 264 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 286 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 286 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 266 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 273 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 266 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X4
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X8
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X7
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X9
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X10
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X11
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X12
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform X17
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant f; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform 2
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 6 is encoded by transcript variant k; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4-like isoform 6
isoform 6 is encoded by transcript variant c; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927322, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927322, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation gene 1, transcript variant 1
mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation gene 1, transcript variant 2
mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation gene 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation protein 1 isoform a
mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation protein 1 isoform b
mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation protein 1 isoform X1
zinc finger protein 532, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 218 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 532, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 218 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 532, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 217 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 532, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 218 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 532, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 221 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 532, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 219 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 532, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 108 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 532, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 106 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 532, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 106 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 532, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 80 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 532, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 81 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 532, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 80 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_024021.1
The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SEC11 homolog C (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 42 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
21 kDa subunit; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
signal peptidase complex catalytic subunit SEC11C
signal peptidase complex catalytic subunit SEC11C isoform X1
gastrin-releasing peptide, transcript variant 1
gastrin-releasing peptide, transcript variant 2
gastrin-releasing peptide, transcript variant 3
gastrin-releasing peptide, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
gastrin-releasing peptide isoform 1 preproprotein
gastrin-releasing peptide isoform 2 preproprotein
isoform 3 preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
gastrin-releasing peptide isoform 3 preproprotein
retina and anterior neural fold homeobox
collagen and calcium binding EGF domains 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
collagen and calcium binding EGF domains 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen and calcium binding EGF domains 1
collagen and calcium binding EGF domains 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
collagen and calcium-binding EGF domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
collagen and calcium-binding EGF domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
collagen and calcium-binding EGF domain-containing protein 1 precursor
collagen and calcium-binding EGF domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate-induced protein 1
cadherin 20, type 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
cadherin 20, type 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 17 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cadherin-20 preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized LOC100130938, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 152, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 37 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 152, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 152, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 152, transcript variant X2
ring finger protein 152, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF152 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF152 isoform X2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF152 isoform X3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF152 isoform X4
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF152 isoform X5
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class N, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_012327.5
phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class N, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_176787.4
GPI ethanolamine phosphate transferase 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 123 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 116 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
lisH domain and HEAT repeat-containing protein KIAA1468 isoform X2
lisH domain and HEAT repeat-containing protein KIAA1468
lisH domain and HEAT repeat-containing protein KIAA1468 isoform X3
lisH domain and HEAT repeat-containing protein KIAA1468 isoform X6
lisH domain and HEAT repeat-containing protein KIAA1468 isoform X7
lisH domain and HEAT repeat-containing protein KIAA1468 isoform X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 101 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
lisH domain and HEAT repeat-containing protein KIAA1468 isoform X8
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11a, NFKB activator, transcript variant 1
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11a, NFKB activator, transcript variant 2
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11a, NFKB activator, transcript variant 3
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11a, NFKB activator, transcript variant 4
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11a, NFKB activator, transcript variant 5
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11a, NFKB activator, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11A isoform 1 precursor
isoform 3 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11A isoform 3 precursor
isoform 4 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11A isoform 4 precursor
isoform 5 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11A isoform 5 precursor
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11A isoform 2 precursor
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11A isoform X1
zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 24 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_017742.4
zinc finger CCHC domain-containing protein 2
zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 75 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 72 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCHC domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
zinc finger CCHC domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
PH domain and leucine rich repeat protein phosphatase 1
PH domain leucine-rich repeat-containing protein phosphatase 1
B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2, transcript variant alpha
alpha isoform is encoded by transcript variant alpha; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2, transcript variant beta
beta isoform is encoded by transcript variant beta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
3-ketodihydrosphingosine reductase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 366 ESTs, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-ketodihydrosphingosine reductase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 141 ESTs, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
3-ketodihydrosphingosine reductase isoform X1
3-ketodihydrosphingosine reductase precursor
3-ketodihydrosphingosine reductase isoform X2
vacuolar protein sorting 4 homolog B (S. cerevisiae)
vacuolar protein sorting 4 homolog B (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 117 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 4B
vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 4B isoform X1
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_002639.4
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 Proteins, and 39% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 12
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 13
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 13, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 4
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 3
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 11 (gene/pseudogene)
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 11 (gene/pseudogene), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 11 (gene/pseudogene), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 7, transcript variant 2
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 7, transcript variant 1
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 7, transcript variant 4
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 7, transcript variant 3
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 2, transcript variant 1
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 2, transcript variant 2
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 10
histocompatibility (minor) serpin domain containing
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 8, transcript variant 2
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 8, transcript variant 1
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 8, transcript variant 4
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 8, transcript variant 3
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 305
uncharacterized LOC101927404, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC101927404, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC101927404, transcript variant X2
cadherin 7, type 2, transcript variant a
cadherin 7, type 2, transcript variant b
cadherin-7 preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cadherin 19, type 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 31 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cadherin 19, type 2, transcript variant 2
cadherin 19, type 2, transcript variant 3
cadherin 19, type 2, transcript variant 1
cadherin 19, type 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dermatan-sulfate epimerase-like protein precursor
thioredoxin-related transmembrane protein 3
thioredoxin-related transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 144 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein disulfide-isomerase TMX3 precursor
protein disulfide-isomerase TMX3 isoform X4
thioredoxin-related transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein disulfide-isomerase TMX3 isoform X1
thioredoxin-related transmembrane protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 76 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein disulfide-isomerase TMX3 isoform X3
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant X12
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001093729.1
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 17 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_024781.2
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 17 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 102B isoform X10
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001087198.1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 102B
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_079057.2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 102B isoform X2
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 102B isoform X3
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 102B isoform X7
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 102B isoform X8
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 102B isoform X9
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 102B isoform X11
coiled-coil domain containing 102B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 102B isoform X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_006566.2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 61 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 54 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of cytokine signaling 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 103 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of cytokine signaling 6, transcript variant X2
suppressor of cytokine signaling 6 isoform X1
suppressor of cytokine signaling 6 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927481, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC101927481, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927481, transcript variant X1
Gilles de la Tourette syndrome chromosome region, candidate 1
gilles de la Tourette syndrome chromosomal region candidate gene 1 protein
uncharacterized LOC100505776, transcript variant 2
uncharacterized LOC100505776, transcript variant 1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 46% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cerebellin 2 precursor, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
neuropilin (NRP) and tolloid (TLL)-like 1, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001201465.1
neuropilin (NRP) and tolloid (TLL)-like 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
neuropilin (NRP) and tolloid (TLL)-like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuropilin (NRP) and tolloid (TLL)-like 1, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_138966.3
neuropilin and tolloid-like protein 1 isoform X4
neuropilin (NRP) and tolloid (TLL)-like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
neuropilin (NRP) and tolloid (TLL)-like 1, transcript variant X5
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_620416.1
neuropilin and tolloid-like protein 1 isoform 3 precursor
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001188394.1
isoform 3 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 4; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
neuropilin and tolloid-like protein 1 isoform X1
neuropilin and tolloid-like protein 1 isoform X2
neuropilin and tolloid-like protein 1 isoform X5
neuropilin (NRP) and tolloid (TLL)-like 1, transcript variant 1
neuropilin and tolloid-like protein 1 isoform 1 precursor
uncharacterized LOC100505797, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC100505797, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 21 homolog (yeast)
mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit Tim21 precursor
translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 21 homolog (yeast), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit Tim21 isoform X1
cytochrome b5 type A (microsomal), transcript variant 3
cytochrome b5 type A (microsomal), transcript variant 1
cytochrome b5 type A (microsomal), transcript variant 2
chromosome 18 open reading frame 63, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized protein C18orf63 isoform X1
family with sequence similarity 69, member C, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
family with sequence similarity 69, member C
CNDP dipeptidase 2 (metallopeptidase M20 family), transcript variant 1
CNDP dipeptidase 2 (metallopeptidase M20 family), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 401 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
CNDP dipeptidase 2 (metallopeptidase M20 family), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 257 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CNDP dipeptidase 2 (metallopeptidase M20 family), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 252 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
CNDP dipeptidase 2 (metallopeptidase M20 family), transcript variant 2
cytosolic non-specific dipeptidase isoform 1
cytosolic non-specific dipeptidase isoform X2
cytosolic non-specific dipeptidase isoform X3
cytosolic non-specific dipeptidase isoform X4
cytosolic non-specific dipeptidase isoform 2
carnosine dipeptidase 1 (metallopeptidase M20 family)
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 909
zinc finger protein 407, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 59 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 407, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 407, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 407, transcript variant 1
zinc finger protein 407, transcript variant 2
zinc finger protein 407, transcript variant 3
zinc binding alcohol dehydrogenase domain containing 2
zinc binding alcohol dehydrogenase domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 124 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc binding alcohol dehydrogenase domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 125 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc-binding alcohol dehydrogenase domain-containing protein 2
zinc-binding alcohol dehydrogenase domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
zinc-binding alcohol dehydrogenase domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
teashirt zinc finger homeobox 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 107 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
teashirt zinc finger homeobox 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 107 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001037331.2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001272093.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001259022.1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 908
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_015417.1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927651, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC101927651, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC101927651, transcript variant X1
zinc finger protein 236, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 47 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger protein 236, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 47 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_007345.3
myelin basic protein, transcript variant 7
myelin basic protein, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 mRNAs, 4680 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
myelin basic protein, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 1369 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
myelin basic protein, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 1838 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
myelin basic protein, transcript variant 4
myelin basic protein, transcript variant 3
myelin basic protein, transcript variant 2
myelin basic protein, transcript variant 1
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
myelin basic protein, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 263 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
myelin basic protein, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 491 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
myelin basic protein, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 498 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
myelin basic protein, transcript variant 8
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1029
uncharacterized LOC645321, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC645321, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class II, type 9B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 53 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class II, type 9B, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 48 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class II, type 9B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class II, type 9B, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class II, type 9B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 27 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class II, type 9B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 27 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class II, type 9B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class II, type 9B, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class II, type 9B, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIB
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIB isoform X2
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIB isoform X4
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIB isoform X9
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIB isoform X1
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIB isoform X3
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIB isoform X5
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIB isoform X10
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIB isoform X6
fibroin heavy chain-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
fibroin heavy chain-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibroin heavy chain-like, transcript variant X3
ATPase, class II, type 9B, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 33 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIB isoform X11
ATPase, class II, type 9B, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 33 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIB isoform X12
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1, transcript variant 6
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1, transcript variant 2
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1, transcript variant 7
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1, transcript variant 4
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1, transcript variant 1
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 isoform F
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 isoform G
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 isoform B
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 isoform A
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 isoform X2
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1, transcript variant 3
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1, transcript variant 5
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1, transcript variant 8
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1, transcript variant 10
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1, transcript variant 9
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 isoform C
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 isoform H
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 isoform E
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 isoform I
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 73 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 isoform X1
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 isoform J
nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 isoform D
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 Protein, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
CTD (carboxy-terminal domain, RNA polymerase II, polypeptide A) phosphatase, subunit 1, transcript variant 1
CTD (carboxy-terminal domain, RNA polymerase II, polypeptide A) phosphatase, subunit 1, transcript variant 2
CTD (carboxy-terminal domain, RNA polymerase II, polypeptide A) phosphatase, subunit 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA polymerase II subunit A C-terminal domain phosphatase isoform 1
RNA polymerase II subunit A C-terminal domain phosphatase isoform X1
RNA polymerase II subunit A C-terminal domain phosphatase isoform 2
CTD (carboxy-terminal domain, RNA polymerase II, polypeptide A) phosphatase, subunit 1, transcript variant 3
CTD (carboxy-terminal domain, RNA polymerase II, polypeptide A) phosphatase, subunit 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 67 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RNA polymerase II subunit A C-terminal domain phosphatase isoform X2
RNA polymerase II subunit A C-terminal domain phosphatase isoform 3
potassium voltage-gated channel, subfamily G, member 2
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily G member 2
PQ loop repeat containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 142 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
PQ loop repeat containing 1, transcript variant 2
PQ loop repeat containing 1, transcript variant 3
PQ loop repeat containing 1, transcript variant 1
PQ loop repeat containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 149 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
PQ-loop repeat-containing protein 1 isoform 3
PQ-loop repeat-containing protein 1 isoform 1
PQ-loop repeat-containing protein 1 isoform X1
PQ-loop repeat-containing protein 1 isoform 2
PQ-loop repeat-containing protein 1 isoform X2
PQ loop repeat containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
PQ-loop repeat-containing protein 1 isoform X3
heat shock factor binding protein 1-like 1
heat shock factor binding protein 1-like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock factor-binding protein 1-like protein 1 isoform X1
heat shock factor-binding protein 1-like protein 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_006701.2
thioredoxin-like 4A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribosome binding factor A (putative), transcript variant 1
ribosome binding factor A (putative), transcript variant 2
putative ribosome-binding factor A, mitochondrial isoform 1 precursor
putative ribosome-binding factor A, mitochondrial isoform 2 precursor
RBFA downstream neighbor (non-protein coding)
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_014913.3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 146 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
PARD6G antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 3
PARD6G antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
par-6 family cell polarity regulator gamma