Homo sapiens chromosome 13, GRCh38 Primary Assembly.
vomeronasal 1 receptor 111 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
family with sequence similarity 230, member C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit F pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
gamma-glutamyltransferase 4 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SET domain containing 8 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
vomeronasal 1 receptor 58 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 962, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 2 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
fem-1 homolog a (C. elegans) pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
telomeric repeat binding factor (NIMA-interacting) 1 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
family with sequence similarity 207, member B, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
brain cytoplasmic RNA 1, pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
glucoside xylosyltransferase 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
calponin 2 pseudogene 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 965, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 417; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily F, polypeptide 34, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
sorting nexin 18 pseudogene 26; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 328-2, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
coiled-coil domain containing 29-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ankyrin repeat domain 20 family, member A9, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ras homolog family member T1 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 55, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 76, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
sorting nexin 19 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 408; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PHD finger protein 2 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 442; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 24 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
general transcription factor IIi, pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 24; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
centromere protein I pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 52, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 4, neutral membrane (neutral sphingomyelinase-3) pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
tubulin, alpha 3c; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
paraspeckle component 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ankyrin repeat domain 26 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein L3 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 421; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase family, member 4 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
family with sequence similarity 58, member D, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; ornithine transporter) member 15 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytochrome c, somatic pseudogene 32; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S31 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cancer susceptibility candidate 4 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
estrogen-related receptor alpha pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
M-phase phosphoprotein 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
paraspeckle component 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ST6 (alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminyl-2,3-beta-galactosyl-1, 3)-N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 4 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger, MYM-type 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
zinc finger, MYM-type 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
KRR1, small subunit (SSU) processome component, homolog (yeast) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
gap junction protein, alpha 3, 46kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
peptidylprolyl isomerase A (cyclophilin A) pseudogene 28; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CX26; DFNA3; DFNA3A; DFNB1; DFNB1A; HID; KID; NSRD1; PPK
gap junction protein, beta 2, 26kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
CX30; DFNA3; DFNA3B; DFNB1B; ECTD2; ED2; EDH; HED; HED2
gap junction protein, beta 6, 30kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
crystallin, lambda 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 4499; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
solute carrier family 35, member E1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
interleukin 17D; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 2 (putative); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RAN, member RAS oncogene family pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
exportin 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
CCR4-NOT transcription complex, subunit 4 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 367; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 pseudogene 30; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
peptidylprolyl isomerase A (cyclophilin A) pseudogene 27; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein SA pseudogene 54; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
large tumor suppressor kinase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U4 small nuclear 9, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S12 pseudogene 23; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Sin3A-associated protein, 18kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein 63; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
estrogen-related receptor alpha pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
mitochondrial intermediate peptidase pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 539; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
G protein-coupled receptor kinase 6 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase pseudogene 52; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 25; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 20; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
histone cluster 1, H2b, pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
mitochondrial calcium uptake 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
farnesyltransferase, CAAX box, alpha pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 59, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein S7 pseudogene 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
fibroblast growth factor 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 424; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NME/NM23 nucleoside diphosphate kinase 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
MT-ND3 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 540; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ferritin, heavy polypeptide 1 pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 39A pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L7a pseudogene 73; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
inositol polyphosphate multikinase pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Rieske (Fe-S) domain containing pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
brain abundant, membrane attached signal protein 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
nuclear undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase 1 homolog (S. cerevisiae) pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
high mobility group AT-hook 1 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
A4; DAGA4; DMDA; DMDA1; LGMD2C; MAM; SCARMD2; SCG3; TYPE
sarcoglycan, gamma (35kDa dystrophin-associated glycoprotein); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 58, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TatD DNase domain containing 2 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SDA1 domain containing 1 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (sacsin); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein, large, P1 pseudogene 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SACS antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 327; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 19; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
mitochondrial intermediate peptidase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
MT-CO3 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
C1QTNF9B antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 9B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ankyrin repeat domain 20 family, member A19, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
spermatogenesis associated 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
importin 7 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 2276; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SPATA13 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein PCOTH pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cell cycle exit and neuronal differentiation 1 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
nuclear undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase 1 homolog (S. cerevisiae) pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cytochrome c, somatic pseudogene 33; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ADPRTL1; ARTD4; p193; PARP-4; PARPL; PH5P; VAULT3; VPARP; VWA5C
poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase family, member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
paraspeckle component 1 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATPase, H+/K+ transporting, nongastric, alpha polypeptide; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L26 pseudogene 34; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
clustered mitochondria (cluA/CLU1) homolog pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
iroquois homeobox 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ankyrin repeat domain 20 family, member A10, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ring finger protein 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
BM032; CENP-J; CPAP; LAP; LIP1; MCPH6; Sas-4; SASS4; SCKL4
centromere protein J; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; ornithine transporter) member 15 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L34 pseudogene 27; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
lymphocyte-specific protein 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
striatin, calmodulin binding protein pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
poly(A) binding protein, cytoplasmic 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
APC membrane recruitment protein 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L23a pseudogene 69; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
myotubularin related protein 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
nucleoporin like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transcription elongation factor B (SIII), polypeptide 2 (18kDa, elongin B) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8A, member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 78, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, Ro-associated Y1 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
shisa family member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8A, member 2 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
prune exopolyphosphatase pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ring finger protein (C3H2C3 type) 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
protein-kinase, interferon-inducible double stranded RNA dependent inhibitor, repressor of (P58 repressor) pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cyclin-dependent kinase 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
WAS protein family, member 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein S3a pseudogene 44; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
G protein-coupled receptor 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
FGFR1 oncogene partner 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S21 pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S20 pseudogene 32; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ubiquitin specific peptidase 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
retinoblastoma binding protein 8 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
USP12 antisense RNA 2 (head to head); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L21; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 102; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 27; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RAS-like, family 11, member A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
general transcription factor IIIA; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 63, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ligand of numb-protein X 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
AC19; POLR1C; RPA16; RPA9; RPAC2; RPC16; RPO1-3; TCS2
polymerase (RNA) I polypeptide D, 16kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
nucleophosmin 1 (nucleolar phosphoprotein B23, numatrin) pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
GS homeobox 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PDX1 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
GSF; IDX-1; IPF1; IUF1; MODY4; PDX-1; STF-1
pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, epsilon subunit pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
caudal type homeobox 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ureidoimidazoline (2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-) decarboxylase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
fms-related tyrosine kinase 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
katanin p80 subunit B-like 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain containing 2 pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
PAN3 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PAN3 poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit homolog (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 82, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
fms-related tyrosine kinase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A1 pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
proteasome maturation protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 46, member 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 53, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytochrome P450, family 51, subfamily A, polypeptide 1 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin-like 13, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microtubule associated tumor suppressor candidate 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase pseudogene 69; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
MTUS2 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ubiquitin-like 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 8B pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 297; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 572; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 544; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
katanin p60 subunit A-like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 64, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
peroxiredoxin 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 426; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2L 5 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
high mobility group box 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA binding motif protein 22 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microfibrillar-associated protein 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 2 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ubiquitin specific peptidase like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 398; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 545; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TEX26 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mesenteric estrogen-dependent adipogenesis; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
testis expressed 26; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
WD40 repeat domain 95, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
heat shock 105kDa/110kDa protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
B3Glc-T; B3GLCT; B3GTL; beta3Glc-T; Gal-T
beta 1,3-galactosyltransferase-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ankyrin repeat domain 26 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
GPR106; GREAT; INSL3R; LGR8; LGR8.1; RXFPR2
relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 delta pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
FRY antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
furry homolog (Drosophila); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
zygote arrest 1-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BRCC2; BROVCA2; FACD; FAD; FAD1; FANCB; FANCD; FANCD1; GLM3; PNCA2
breast cancer 2, early onset; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8A, member 2 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CG012; N4BP2L2-IT; N4BP2L2-IT1; N4BP2L2IT1
mitochondrial inner membrane organizing system 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
N4BPL2 intronic transcript 2 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PDS5, regulator of cohesion maintenance, homolog B (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 423; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 22 homolog (yeast) pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
klotho; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
STARD13 antisense RNA; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
replication factor C (activator 1) 3, 38kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U5A small nuclear 4, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
voltage-dependent anion channel 1 pseudogene 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 457; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
neurobeachin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
prohibitin pseudogene 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
mab-21-like 1 (C. elegans); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
doublecortin-like kinase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transfer RNA glutamine 50 (anticodon UUG) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CCDC169-SOHLH2 readthrough; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
spermatogenesis and oogenesis specific basic helix-loop-helix 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain containing 169; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 71, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
spastic paraplegia 20 (Troyer syndrome); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
SPG20 opposite strand; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cyclin A1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
histone cluster 1, H2a, pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
serine-rich and transmembrane domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase pseudogene 34; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
transcription elongation factor A (SII)-like 4 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ADP-ribosylation factor-like 2 binding protein pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
regulatory factor X-associated protein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
MADH6; MADH9; PPH2; SMAD8; SMAD8A; SMAD8B
SMAD family member 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
late endosomal/lysosomal adaptor, MAPK and MTOR activator 3 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L29 pseudogene 28; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A1 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ALG5, dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
exosome component 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
casein kinase 1, alpha 1-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein S12 pseudogene 24; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 547; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
periostin, osteoblast specific factor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
heat shock 60kDa protein 1 (chaperonin) pseudogene 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 571; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin-fold modifier 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 366; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
peroxiredoxin 3 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
FRAS1 related extracellular matrix protein 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 56, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phospholipase A2, group XIIA pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ankyrin repeat domain 26 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
stomatin (EPB72)-like 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
proline and serine rich 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
NHL repeat containing 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NTF2-like export factor 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
lipoma HMGIC fusion partner; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
component of oligomeric golgi complex 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 4305; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, Ro-associated Y4 pseudogene 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CDKN2A interacting protein N-terminal like pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 332; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 548; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 598; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, 7SK small nuclear pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
forkhead box O1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ring finger protein, LIM domain interacting pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 320d-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S31; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; ornithine transporter) member 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 621; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytochrome c, somatic pseudogene 34; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SUGT1 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E74-like factor 1 (ets domain transcription factor); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
regulator of G-protein signaling 17 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
WW domain binding protein 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 3168; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
kelch repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
calmodulin 2 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
kelch repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mortality factor 4 like 1 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
mitochondrial translational release factor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 57, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tubulin, beta pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor, family 7, subfamily E, member 36 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor, family 7, subfamily E, member 155 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor, family 7, subfamily E, member 37 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
regulator of cell cycle; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 5006; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
lysyl-tRNA synthetase pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
VWA8 antisense RNA 1 (head to head); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein S28 pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
diacylglycerol kinase, eta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
mitogen-activated protein kinase 6 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
fumarate hydratase pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
fatty acid binding protein 3, pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CD254; hRANKL2; ODF; OPGL; OPTB2; RANKL; sOdf; TRANCE
tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
family with sequence similarity 216, member B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
epithelial stromal interaction 1 (breast); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 4 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
molybdenum cofactor synthesis 3 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L36 pseudogene 19; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
coiled-coil domain containing 122; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
laccase (multicopper oxidoreductase) domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
diacylglycerol kinase, zeta pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 284; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SMIM2 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small integral membrane protein 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SMIM2 intronic transcript 1 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA mir-8079; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
stress-associated endoplasmic reticulum protein family member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1071; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TSC22 domain family, member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
TSC22D1 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily e, member 1 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 330; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
nuclear fragile X mental retardation protein interacting protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
GPALPP motifs containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, 7SK small nuclear pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
general transcription factor IIF, polypeptide 2, 30kDa; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 69, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tumor protein, translationally-controlled 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
small nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 31; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TPT1 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
reticulocalbin 1, EF-hand calcium binding domain pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 25, member 30; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
peptidylprolyl isomerase A (cyclophilin A) pseudogene 25; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
component of oligomeric golgi complex 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
family with sequence similarity 194, member B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 9 homolog (yeast) pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cytochrome c oxidase subunit IV isoform 1 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
aldo-keto reductase family 1, member B1 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
spermatid associated; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
siah E3 ubiquitin protein ligase family member 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
CPB2 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
carboxypeptidase B2 (plasma); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1 (L-plastin); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
leucine rich repeat containing 63; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, 7SK small nuclear pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
family with sequence similarity 206, member B, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 563; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
KIAA0226-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 68, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 2 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor, family 7, subfamily E, member 101 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
COX17 cytochrome c oxidase copper chaperone pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
FK506 binding protein 1A, 12kDa pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
leucine-rich repeats and calponin homology (CH) domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
esterase D; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 2A, G protein-coupled; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
HTR2A antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), gamma 5 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
nucleosome assembly protein 1-like 4 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L27a pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
succinate-CoA ligase, ADP-forming, beta subunit; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
nudix (nucleoside diphosphate linked moiety X)-type motif 15; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mediator complex subunit 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
MED4 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
polymerase (RNA) II (DNA directed) polypeptide K, 7.0kDa pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ABRI; BRI; BRI2; BRICD2B; E25B; E3-16; FBD; imBRI2
integral membrane protein 2B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 441; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
retinoblastoma 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 26 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
PEST containing nuclear protein pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
lysophosphatidic acid receptor 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 462; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CYSLT2; CYSLT2R; HG57; hGPCR21; HPN321; KPG_011; PSEC0146
cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proteasome activator subunit 2 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
fibronectin type III domain containing 3A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RAD17 homolog (S. pombe) pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, Ro-associated Y3 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIc pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
2-oxoglutarate and iron-dependent oxygenase domain containing 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
motilin receptor; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein-kinase, interferon-inducible double stranded RNA dependent inhibitor, repressor of (P58 repressor) pseudogene 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
calcium binding protein 39-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SET domain, bifurcated 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide G pseudogene 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
APY; BCAP; IGEL; IGER; IGHER; NY-REN-34; NYREN34; RP11-185C18.3
PHD finger protein 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ADP-ribosylation factor-like 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
emopamil binding protein-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
karyopherin alpha 3 (importin alpha 4); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CTAGE family, member 10, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SPRY domain containing 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
1B4; BCMSUN; DLB2; LEU2; LINC00022; MIR15AHG; NCRNA00022; RFP2OS; TRIM13OS
deleted in lymphocytic leukemia 2 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3613; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tripartite motif containing 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
potassium channel regulator; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 16-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 15a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BCMS; DLB1; DLEU2; LEU1; LEU2; LINC00021; NCRNA00021; XTP6
deleted in lymphocytic leukemia 1 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L18 pseudogene 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
suppression of tumorigenicity 13 (colon carcinoma) (Hsp70 interacting protein) pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L34 pseudogene 26; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
deleted in lymphocytic leukemia, 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DLEU7 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 28; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNASEH2B antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribonuclease H2, subunit B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
guanylate cyclase 1, soluble, beta 2 (pseudogene); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 371; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L5 pseudogene 31; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
family with sequence similarity 124A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade E (nexin, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1), member 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 5693; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
integrator complex subunit 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
INTS6 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein S4X pseudogene 16; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide G pseudogene 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 4703; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, Ro-associated Y1 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit B1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 282; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain containing 70; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
CTAGE family, member 3, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
fatty acid binding protein 5 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ALG11, alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
UTP14, U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein, homolog C (yeast); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NIMA-related kinase 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
uncharacterized LOC101929657; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NIMA-related kinase 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S31 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
thrombospondin, type I, domain containing 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
thrombospondin, type I, domain containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, Ro-associated Y4 pseudogene 24; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
vacuolar protein sorting 36 homolog (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cytoskeleton associated protein 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1-like 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S31 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SGT1, suppressor of G2 allele of SKP1 (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
leukocyte cell derived chemotaxin 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 759; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
peptidylprolyl isomerase A (cyclophilin A) pseudogene 26; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protocadherin 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
bA209J19.1; GC1; GW112; hGC-1; hOLfD; OlfD; OLM4; UNQ362
olfactomedin 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protocadherin 8 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
zinc finger protein 646 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 558; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 458; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 1297; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L13a pseudogene 25; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 5007; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
hepatocyte nuclear factor 4, gamma pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
spermatogenesis associated 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 7SK small nuclear pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
proline rich 20A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proline rich 20B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proline rich 20C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proline rich 20D; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proline rich 20E; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
MT-CO2 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; adenine nucleotide translocator), member 5 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L31 pseudogene 53; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protocadherin 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transfer RNA glutamic acid 39 (anticodon CUC) pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 30; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CTAGE family, member 16, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily A, member 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 2 pseudogene 39; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide K, 12.3 kDa pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribonuclease P/MRP 40kDa subunit pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, U7 small nuclear 88 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
AN; AUNA1; DIA2; diap3; DRF3; mDia2; NSDAN
diaphanous-related formin 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DIAPH3 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DIAPH3 antisense RNA 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TAR DNA binding protein pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
tudor domain containing 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 31; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A1 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 378; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3169; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protocadherin 20; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 358; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L32 pseudogene 28; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 395; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
olfactory receptor, family 7, subfamily E, member 156 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 81, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 2 pseudogene 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor, family 7, subfamily E, member 104 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
nuclear transcription factor Y, alpha pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
legumain pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
steroidogenic acute regulatory protein pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A3 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 548x-2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 4704; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tripartite motif containing 60 pseudogene 19; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protocadherin 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U7 small nuclear 87 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
PCDH9 antisense RNA 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PCDH9 antisense RNA 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PCDH9 antisense RNA 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein SA pseudogene 53; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
nucleophosmin 1 (nucleolar phosphoprotein B23, numatrin) pseudogene 22; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor, family 7, subfamily E, member 111 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
olfactory receptor, family 7, subfamily E, member 33 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
elongation factor, RNA polymerase II, 2 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 pseudogene 18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L37 pseudogene 21; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S3a pseudogene 52; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L12 pseudogene 34; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 550; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 20 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide F pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
kelch-like family member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, Ro-associated Y3 pseudogene 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit, ATPase, 1 pseudogene 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
5',3'-nucleotidase, cytosolic pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
LUC7-like 3 (S. cerevisiae) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ATXN8 opposite strand (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SOGA family member 2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 348; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Rab9 effector protein with kelch motifs pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
dachshund homolog 1 (Drosophila); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
H3 histone, family 3B (H3.3B) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L21 pseudogene 109; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L35a pseudogene 31; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein S10 pseudogene 21; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 32; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L18a pseudogene 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L21 pseudogene 110; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
mitotic spindle organizing protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
bora, aurora kinase A activator; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DIS3 mitotic control homolog (S. cerevisiae); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
progesterone immunomodulatory binding factor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 79, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase, 10 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Kruppel-like factor 5 (intestinal); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
fatty acid binding protein 5 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 66, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U7 small nuclear 89 pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, U4 small nuclear 10, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, Ro-associated Y1 pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
MAP/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 2 pseudogene 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Kruppel-like factor 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, Ro-associated Y1 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L21 pseudogene 108; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 381; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 347; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RIO kinase 3 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
signal sequence receptor, alpha pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
CTAGE family, member 11, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TBC1 domain family, member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
COMM domain containing 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L3 (ubiquitin thiolesterase); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
LIM domain 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
family with sequence similarity 204, member C, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromosome 13 open reading frame 45; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
basic transcription factor 3 pseudogene 11; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
immunoresponsive 1 homolog (mouse); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L7 pseudogene 44; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DEAH (Asp-Glu-Ala-His) box polypeptide 9 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ceroid-lipofuscinosis, neuronal 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
MYCBP2 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
sciellin; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, Ro-associated Y3 pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
serine palmitoyltransferase, long chain base subunit 1 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SLAIN motif family, member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 3665; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
EDNRB antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ABCDS; ET-B; ET-BR; ETB; ETBR; ETRB; HSCR; HSCR2; WS4A
endothelin receptor type B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1069; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 446; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNF219 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L31 pseudogene 54; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
transcription elongation factor B (SIII), polypeptide 1 pseudogene 23; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
POU class 4 homeobox 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ring finger protein 219; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L21 pseudogene 111; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 331; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
heat shock 60kDa protein 1 (chaperonin) pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 5 (epsilon) pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
non imprinted in Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome 2 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
breast carcinoma amplified sequence 2 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA binding motif protein 26; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 33; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RBM26 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NDFIP2 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Nedd4 family interacting protein 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1080; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
sprouty homolog 2 (Drosophila); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 pseudogene 31; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
PWWP domain containing 2A pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ADP-ribosylation factor 4 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
HIG1 hypoxia inducible domain family, member 1A pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
prothymosin, alpha pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
glycogenin 1 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 67, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SLIT and NTRK-like family, member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
VENT homeobox pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2D 3 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 333; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
MT-ND4 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
MT-ND5 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 351; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 72, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SLIT and NTRK-like family, member 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
MOB kinase activator 1A pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box helicase 6 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
thioredoxin-like 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ubiquitin B pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
LIN28A pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
MIR4500 host gene (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 4500; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SLIT and NTRK-like family, member 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
nudix (nucleoside diphosphate linked moiety X)-type motif 21 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 397; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L29 pseudogene 29; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 433; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
GrpE-like 2, mitochondrial (E. coli) pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
tripartite motif containing 60 pseudogene 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Sp3 transcription factor pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
heat shock 70kDa protein 8 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 353; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L7-like 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
peroxisomal biogenesis factor 12 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 559; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
fatty acyl CoA reductase 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
keratin 18 pseudogene 27; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 622; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 75, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 410; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BRICK1, SCAR/WAVE actin-nucleating complex subunit pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 380; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 379; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
peptidylprolyl isomerase A (cyclophilin A) pseudogene 23; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
C13orf25; FGLDS2; LINC00048; MIHG1; miR-17-92; MIRH1; MIRHG1; NCRNA00048
miR-17-92 cluster host gene (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
hsa-mir-17; miR-17; miR17-3p; MIR17-5p; MIR91; MIRN17; MIRN91; miRNA17; miRNA91
microRNA 17; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
hsa-mir-18; hsa-mir-18a; miR-18; MIR18; MIRN18; MIRN18A; miRNA18A
microRNA 18a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 19a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
hsa-mir-20; hsa-mir-20a; miR-20; MIR20; MIRN20; MIRN20A; miRNA20A
microRNA 20a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 19b-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 92a-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glypican 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
fatty acid binding protein 5 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 548as; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
GPC5 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
glypican 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 pseudogene 29; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
GPC6 antisense RNA 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 35; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
GPC6 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
dopachrome tautomerase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
TDP-glucose 4,6-dehydratase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
G protein-coupled receptor 180; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 36; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 21; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SOX21 antisense RNA 1 (head to head); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
bromodomain containing 7 pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L21 pseudogene 112; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
claudin 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CLDN10 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
MT-ND5 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
MT-CYB pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
UDP-glucose glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1 pseudogene 24; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
heparan sulfate 6-O-sulfotransferase 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 4501; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
AMMECR1-like pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
heat shock protein 90kDa alpha (cytosolic), class B member 6, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 359; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tubby like protein 3 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
oxoglutarate (alpha-ketoglutarate) receptor 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
muscleblind-like splicing regulator 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 37; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RAP2A, member of RAS oncogene family; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, alpha type, 6 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L7a pseudogene 61; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
importin 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ferritin, light polypeptide pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
FERM, RhoGEF (ARHGEF) and pleckstrin domain protein 1 (chondrocyte-derived); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ring finger protein 113B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 3170; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
serine/threonine kinase 24; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
nuclear undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase 1 homolog (S. cerevisiae) pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cytochrome c, somatic pseudogene 35; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
calmodulin 2 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
solute carrier family 15 (oligopeptide transporter), member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
dedicator of cytokinesis 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DOCK9 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L7-like 1 pseudogene 12; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, U6 small nuclear 83, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DOCK9 antisense RNA 2 (head to head); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein S6 pseudogene 23; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase pseudogene 22; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
UBAC2 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
UBA domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
RNA, 7SK small nuclear pseudogene 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
H2A histone family, member Z pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
G protein-coupled receptor 18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
G protein-coupled receptor 183; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
FKSG29; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 623; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
high mobility group box 3 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 12, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
transmembrane 9 superfamily member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, Ro-associated Y3 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
cofilin 1 (non-muscle) pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
citrate lyase beta like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 4306; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
CLYBL antisense RNA 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Zic family member 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Zic family member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 554; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplex, 12 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
asparagine synthetase pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
propionyl CoA carboxylase, alpha polypeptide; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein L15 pseudogene 18; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
PCCA antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L7-like 1 pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ribosomal protein S26 pseudogene 47; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
transmembrane and tetratricopeptide repeat containing 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cytochrome c oxidase subunit Vb pseudogene 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
NALCN antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ADP-ribosylation factor 4 pseudogene 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
sodium leak channel, non-selective; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
integrin, beta-like 1 (with EGF-like repeat domains); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
fibroblast growth factor 14; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, U1 small nuclear 24, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
high mobility group box 3 pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 2681; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
lipoyltransferase 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
LINE-1 type transposase domain containing 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
RNA, Ro-associated Y1 pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
microRNA 4705; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L39 pseudogene 29; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
FGF14 intronic transcript 1 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
FGF14 antisense RNA 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tripeptidyl peptidase II; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
methyltransferase like 21C; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain containing 168; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
testis expressed 30; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
KDEL (Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu) containing 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BIVM-ERCC5 readthrough; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, Ro-associated Y5 pseudogene 8; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
methyltransferase like 21E, pseudogene; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 10 (sodium/bile acid cotransporter), member 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal 13kDa, V1 subunit G1 pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L7 pseudogene 45; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
DAOA antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
D-amino acid oxidase activator; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 343; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 38; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 460; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L35 pseudogene 9; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ribosomal protein L35 pseudogene 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
ephrin-B2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
arginine and glutamate rich 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 551; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 443; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex, subunit C1 (subunit 9) pseudogene 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
peptidylprolyl isomerase A (cyclophilin A) pseudogene 24; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
family with sequence similarity 155, member A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 1267; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
FAM155A intronic transcript 1 (non-protein coding); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ligase IV, DNA, ATP-dependent; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
abhydrolase domain containing 13; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
BAFF; BLYS; CD257; DTL; TALL-1; TALL1; THANK; TNFSF20; ZTNF4
tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 13b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
host cell factor C2 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
myosin XVI; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
MYO16 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 676; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
insulin receptor substrate 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA, 7SK small nuclear pseudogene 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
collagen, type IV, alpha 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collagen, type IV, alpha 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA mir-8073; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
COL4A2 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RAB20, member RAS oncogene family; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
carbohydrate kinase domain containing; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial (putative); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
p24ING1c; p33; p33ING1; p33ING1b; p47; p47ING1a
inhibitor of growth family, member 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ribosomal protein L21 pseudogene 107; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 346; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ankyrin repeat domain 10; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase family, member 1 pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
BETA-PIX; COOL-1; COOL1; Nbla10314; P50; P50BP; P85; P85COOL1; P85SPR; PAK3; PIXB
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
spalt-like transcription factor 4 pseudogene 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
testis expressed 29; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1070; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
sperm acrosome associated 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
104p; GCP3; Grip104; SPBC98; Spc98; Spc98p
tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
chromosome 13 open reading frame 35; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATPase, class VI, type 11A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ATP11A antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
MCF2L antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coagulation factor VII (serum prothrombin conversion accelerator); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
coagulation factor X; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
lysyl-tRNA synthetase pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
protein Z, vitamin K-dependent plasma glycoprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PCI domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cullin 4A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA mir-8075; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
lactate dehydrogenase B pseudogene 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
growth hormone regulated TBC protein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ADP-ribosylhydrolase like 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
DCN1, defective in cullin neddylation 1, domain containing 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
transcription factor Dp-1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
ATPase, H+/K+ exchanging, beta polypeptide; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
G protein-coupled receptor kinase 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 552; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transmembrane protein 255B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
GAS6 antisense RNA 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
growth arrest-specific 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
GAS6 antisense RNA 2 (head to head); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 452; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 565; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RAS p21 protein activator 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
cell division cycle 16; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
microRNA 548ar; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
microRNA 4502; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
UPF3 regulator of nonsense transcripts homolog A (yeast); Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Charcot-Leyden crystal protein pseudogene 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
chromosome alignment maintaining phosphoprotein 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq,Gnomon.
Linear centromere model derived predominantly from reads generated in PMID: 17803354. This region does not represent an actual centromere sequence, as long-range ordering of repeats and unmapped WGS contigs is not provided by the model. For details of model production, see http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.0035.
family with sequence similarity 230, member C
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Curated Genomic.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
putative ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 30B-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 Proteins, and 28% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 417
ankyrin repeat domain 20 family, member A9, pseudogene
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 408
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 442
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 421
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2, transcript variant 6
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2, transcript variant 8
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2, transcript variant 1
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2, transcript variant 3
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2, transcript variant 4
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2, transcript variant 7
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2, transcript variant 5
isoform alpha is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2 isoform alpha
isoform delta is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2 isoform delta
isoform gamma is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2 isoform gamma
isoform C2 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase TPTE2 isoform C2
M-phase phosphoprotein 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 177 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
M-phase phosphoprotein 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 106 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
M-phase phosphoprotein 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 106 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
paraspeckle component 1, transcript variant 2
paraspeckle component 1, transcript variant 3
paraspeckle component 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 321 ESTs, 15 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
paraspeckle component 1, transcript variant 1
paraspeckle component 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 274 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, MYM-type 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 30 ESTs, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, MYM-type 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, MYM-type 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, MYM-type 5, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, MYM-type 5, transcript variant 3
zinc finger MYM-type protein 5 isoform X3
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger MYM-type protein 5 isoform 3
zinc finger MYM-type protein 5 isoform X1
zinc finger MYM-type protein 5 isoform X2
zinc finger MYM-type protein 5 isoform X4
zinc finger, MYM-type 5, transcript variant 2
zinc finger, MYM-type 5, transcript variant 1
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger MYM-type protein 5 isoform 1
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger MYM-type protein 5 isoform 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, MYM-type 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 228 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, MYM-type 2, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_003453.3
annotated by transcript or proteomic data
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger, MYM-type 2, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_197968.2
zinc finger, MYM-type 2, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001190964.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
zinc finger, MYM-type 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 231 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, MYM-type 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 97 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, MYM-type 2, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001190965.1
zinc finger, MYM-type 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 227 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, MYM-type 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 228 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, MYM-type 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 227 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger MYM-type protein 2 isoform X2
zinc finger MYM-type protein 2 isoform X3
zinc finger MYM-type protein 2 isoform X4
zinc finger MYM-type protein 2 isoform X5
zinc finger MYM-type protein 2 isoform X6
zinc finger MYM-type protein 2 isoform X7
gap junction protein, alpha 3, 46kDa, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein, beta 2, 26kDa, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 84 ESTs, 31 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein, beta 2, 26kDa, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 84 ESTs, 31 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
gap junction protein, beta 2, 26kDa, transcript variant X3
gap junction protein, beta 6, 30kDa, transcript variant 4
gap junction protein, beta 6, 30kDa, transcript variant 2
gap junction protein, beta 6, 30kDa, transcript variant 1
gap junction protein, beta 6, 30kDa, transcript variant 3
crystallin, lambda 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 83 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin, lambda 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 71 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
crystallin, lambda 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 71 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 65 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 64 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 58 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 56 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 49 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 31 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant 1
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant 2
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 62 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 61 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 66 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform X1
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform X6
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform X3
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform X4
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform X2
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform X7
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform X5
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform 1
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform X8
intraflagellar transport 88 homolog (Chlamydomonas), transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 62 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform 2
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform X12
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform X13
intraflagellar transport protein 88 homolog isoform X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 71 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 2 (putative), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 50 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 2 (putative)
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_174928.1
N(6)-adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 2
N(6)-adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 2 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 145 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 131 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 127 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 367
large tumor suppressor kinase 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 109 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase LATS2 isoform X1
histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP18
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3, transcript variant 2
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3, transcript variant 1
spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 36 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
spindle and kinetochore-associated protein 3 isoform 2
spindle and kinetochore-associated protein 3 isoform 1
spindle and kinetochore-associated protein 3 isoform X1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_024026.4
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 144C-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
putative coiled-coil domain-containing protein 144C
mitochondrial intermediate peptidase pseudogene 3, transcript variant 2
mitochondrial intermediate peptidase pseudogene 3, transcript variant 1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 539, transcript variant 2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 539, transcript variant 1
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 20, transcript variant 2
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 20, transcript variant 4
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 20, transcript variant 3
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 20, transcript variant 1
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 20, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 139 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 20, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 144 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 20, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 141 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 20, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 138 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 20, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 127 ESTs, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC20 isoform 1
probable palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC20 isoform X3
probable palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC20 isoform 2
probable palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC20 isoform X2
probable palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC20 isoform X1
probable palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC20 isoform X4
mitochondrial calcium uptake 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 424
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 540
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein
brain abundant, membrane attached signal protein 1 pseudogene 1
sarcoglycan, gamma (35kDa dystrophin-associated glycoprotein), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
sarcoglycan, gamma (35kDa dystrophin-associated glycoprotein)
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_000231.2
sarcoglycan, gamma (35kDa dystrophin-associated glycoprotein), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_000222.1
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (sacsin), transcript variant 1
spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (sacsin), transcript variant 2
spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (sacsin), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 157 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 327
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 19, transcript variant 2
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 19, transcript variant 4
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 19, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 103 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 19, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 49 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 19, transcript variant 3
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 19, transcript variant 1
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 19 isoform X2
isoform 2 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 19 isoform 2 precursor
isoform 2 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 1 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 19 isoform 1 precursor
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 19 isoform X1
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 19 isoform 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_005932.3
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_005923.2
C1QTNF9B antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
C1QTNF9B antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 9B, transcript variant 2
C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 9B, transcript variant 1
complement C1q and tumor necrosis factor-related protein 9B precursor
ankyrin repeat domain 20 family, member A19, pseudogene
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant 3
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant 7
spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 isoform 3
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant 1
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant 2
spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 isoform 1
spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 isoform 2
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant 5
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant 6
spermatogenesis associated 13, transcript variant 4
isoform 6 is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 isoform 6
isoform 4 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 isoform 4
isoform 5 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 isoform 5
C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 9
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_178540.3
complement C1q and tumor necrosis factor-related protein 9A precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins
poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase family, member 4
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 26-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2 pseudogene 6
ATPase, H+/K+ transporting, nongastric, alpha polypeptide, transcript variant 1
ATPase, H+/K+ transporting, nongastric, alpha polypeptide, transcript variant 2
potassium-transporting ATPase alpha chain 2 isoform 1
potassium-transporting ATPase alpha chain 2 isoform 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 17, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 17, transcript variant 1
ring finger protein 17, transcript variant 2
ring finger protein 17, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 17, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 17, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 17, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 17, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 17, transcript variant X5
ring finger protein 17, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein 17, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
centromere protein J, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_047595.1
centromere protein J, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_018451.4
centromere protein J, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_047594.1
centromere protein J, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 43 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 49% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2 pseudogene 1
APC membrane recruitment protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 98 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
APC membrane recruitment protein 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 108 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
APC membrane recruitment protein 2, transcript variant 1
APC membrane recruitment protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 95 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
APC membrane recruitment protein 2, transcript variant 2
APC membrane recruitment protein 2 isoform 2
APC membrane recruitment protein 2 isoform X3
APC membrane recruitment protein 2 isoform 1
APC membrane recruitment protein 2 isoform X1
APC membrane recruitment protein 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 24% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_004685.3
myotubularin related protein 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 312 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin related protein 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 150 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
myotubularin-related protein 6 isoform X2
myotubularin-related protein 6 isoform X1
nucleoporin like 1, transcript variant 1
nucleoporin like 1, transcript variant 2
nucleoporin like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 352 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8A, member 2
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8A, member 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 140 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8A, member 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8A, member 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8A, member 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8A, member 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 132 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8A, member 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 131 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, aminophospholipid transporter, class I, type 8A, member 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 131 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB isoform X1
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB isoform X4
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB isoform X2
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB isoform X5
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB isoform X6
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IB isoform X3
ring finger protein (C3H2C3 type) 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 88 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF6 isoform X3
ring finger protein (C3H2C3 type) 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 134 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein (C3H2C3 type) 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 113 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ring finger protein (C3H2C3 type) 6, transcript variant 1
ring finger protein (C3H2C3 type) 6, transcript variant 4
ring finger protein (C3H2C3 type) 6, transcript variant 3
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF6 isoform X1
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF6 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
cyclin-dependent kinase 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 83 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001260.1
cyclin-dependent kinase 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 61 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
WAS protein family, member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 137 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family member 3
wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family member 3 isoform X1
G protein-coupled receptor 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 27 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
G-protein coupled receptor 12 isoform X1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 12
ubiquitin specific peptidase 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 12 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
RAS-like, family 11, member A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RAS-like, family 11, member A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ras-like protein family member 11A isoform X1
ras-like protein family member 11A isoform X2
non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3, transcript variant 2
mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3, transcript variant 1
mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3, transcript variant 4
mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3, transcript variant 3
mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 91 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 98 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 101 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 90 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
translation initiation factor IF-3, mitochondrial
translation initiation factor IF-3, mitochondrial isoform X1
translation initiation factor IF-3, mitochondrial isoform X2
translation initiation factor IF-3, mitochondrial isoform X3
translation initiation factor IF-3, mitochondrial isoform X4
ligand of numb-protein X 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 36 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
polymerase (RNA) I polypeptide D, 16kDa, transcript variant 3
polymerase (RNA) I polypeptide D, 16kDa, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 274 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
polymerase (RNA) I polypeptide D, 16kDa, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 103 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
polymerase (RNA) I polypeptide D, 16kDa, transcript variant 2
polymerase (RNA) I polypeptide D, 16kDa, transcript variant 1
DNA-directed RNA polymerases I and III subunit RPAC2 isoform 2
DNA-directed RNA polymerases I and III subunit RPAC2 isoform X3
DNA-directed RNA polymerases I and III subunit RPAC2 isoform 1
DNA-directed RNA polymerases I and III subunit RPAC2 isoform X1
DNA-directed RNA polymerases I and III subunit RPAC2 isoform 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_145657.1
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, epsilon subunit pseudogene 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001265.4
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001256.3
ureidoimidazoline (2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-) decarboxylase
putative 2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-ureidoimidazoline decarboxylase
receptor-type tyrosine-protein kinase FLT3
PAN3 poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 83 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAN3 poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 84 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAN3 poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
PAN3 poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAN3 poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit homolog (S. cerevisiae)
PAB-dependent poly(A)-specific ribonuclease subunit 3
PAB-dependent poly(A)-specific ribonuclease subunit 3 isoform X1
PAB-dependent poly(A)-specific ribonuclease subunit 3 isoform X2
PAB-dependent poly(A)-specific ribonuclease subunit 3 isoform X4
PAB-dependent poly(A)-specific ribonuclease subunit 3 isoform X5
PAN3 poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 82 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAN3 poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 82 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
PAN3 poly(A) specific ribonuclease subunit homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X6
PAB-dependent poly(A)-specific ribonuclease subunit 3 isoform X3
PAB-dependent poly(A)-specific ribonuclease subunit 3 isoform X6
PAB-dependent poly(A)-specific ribonuclease subunit 3 isoform X7
fms-related tyrosine kinase 1, transcript variant 1
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 isoform 1 precursor
fms-related tyrosine kinase 1, transcript variant 3
isoform 3 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 isoform 3 precursor
fms-related tyrosine kinase 1, transcript variant 2
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 isoform 2 precursor
fms-related tyrosine kinase 1, transcript variant 4
isoform 4 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 isoform 4 precursor
solute carrier family 46, member 3, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001135919.1
solute carrier family 46, member 3, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_181785.3
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 46, member 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 46 member 3 isoform X1
isoform b precursor is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 46 member 3 isoform b precursor
isoform a precursor is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
solute carrier family 46 member 3 isoform a precursor
microtubule associated tumor suppressor candidate 2, transcript variant 1
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor candidate 2 isoform a
microtubule associated tumor suppressor candidate 2, transcript variant 2
microtubule-associated tumor suppressor candidate 2 isoform b
solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_003045.4
solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 279 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
high affinity cationic amino acid transporter 1
high affinity cationic amino acid transporter 1 isoform X1
adenomatous polyposis coli protein 2-like
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 40% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 297
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 572
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 544
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 384
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 13% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
katanin p60 subunit A-like 1, transcript variant 1
katanin p60 subunit A-like 1, transcript variant 2
katanin p60 subunit A-like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 80 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
katanin p60 subunit A-like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 75 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 1
katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 1 isoform X1
katanin p60 ATPase-containing subunit A-like 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 426
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_002128.4
high mobility group box 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 1059 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group box 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 685 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group box 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 708 ESTs, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
high mobility group protein B1 isoform X1
high mobility group protein B1 isoform X3
high mobility group protein B1 isoform X6
ubiquitin specific peptidase like 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 98 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase like 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 68 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin specific peptidase like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 69 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
SUMO-specific isopeptidase USPL1 isoform X1
SUMO-specific isopeptidase USPL1 isoform X3
SUMO-specific isopeptidase USPL1 isoform X2
transfer RNA asparagine 7 (anticodon GUU); tRNA features were annotated by tRNAscan-SE; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein, transcript variant 2
arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein isoform 2
arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein, transcript variant 1
arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein isoform 1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 398
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 545
TEX26 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
mesenteric estrogen-dependent adipogenesis
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_032849.3
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_116238.2
mesenteric estrogen-dependent adipogenesis protein
TEX26 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
testis expressed 26, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
testis-expressed sequence 26 protein isoform X1
heat shock 105kDa/110kDa protein 1, transcript variant 4
heat shock 105kDa/110kDa protein 1, transcript variant 3
heat shock 105kDa/110kDa protein 1, transcript variant 2
heat shock 105kDa/110kDa protein 1, transcript variant 1
heat shock 105kDa/110kDa protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 268 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
heat shock 105kDa/110kDa protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 270 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
beta 1,3-galactosyltransferase-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 49 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 2, transcript variant 1
relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 2, transcript variant 2
eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 delta pseudogene 3
furry homolog (Drosophila), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 115 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_000059.3
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_000050.2
breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 1, transcript variant 4
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 1, transcript variant 2
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 1, transcript variant 5
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 1, transcript variant 3
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 1, transcript variant 1
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 1 isoform 3
isoform 4 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 1 isoform 4
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 1 isoform 1
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 1 isoform 2
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 1 isoform X1
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant 1
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant 3
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 85 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 95 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 109 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 135 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 159 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 149 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2 isoform X12
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2 isoform X6
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2 isoform 1
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2 isoform X1
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2 isoform X2
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2 isoform X3
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2 isoform X4
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2 isoform X5
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2 isoform 3
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2 isoform X7
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 135 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2 isoform X11
mitochondrial inner membrane organizing system 1 pseudogene 1
N4BPL2 intronic transcript 2 (non-protein coding)
NEDD4 binding protein 2-like 2, transcript variant 2
NEDD4-binding protein 2-like 2 isoform 2
PDS5, regulator of cohesion maintenance, homolog B (S. cerevisiae)
PDS5, regulator of cohesion maintenance, homolog B (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 123 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
PDS5, regulator of cohesion maintenance, homolog B (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 121 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
PDS5, regulator of cohesion maintenance, homolog B (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 117 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
PDS5, regulator of cohesion maintenance, homolog B (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 123 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B isoform X4
sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B
sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B isoform X3
sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B isoform X1
sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B isoform X2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 423
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 13, transcript variant 4
StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 13, transcript variant 1
StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 13, transcript variant 3
StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 13, transcript variant 2
StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 13, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 81 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 84 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 13, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 81 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform 4
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform X1
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform 1
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform 2
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform 3
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform X2
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform X3
StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 13, transcript variant 6
StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 13, transcript variant 5
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform 6
stAR-related lipid transfer protein 13 isoform 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
replication factor C (activator 1) 3, 38kDa, transcript variant 2
replication factor C (activator 1) 3, 38kDa, transcript variant 1
replication factor C subunit 3 isoform 2
replication factor C subunit 3 isoform 1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 457
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 123 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 116 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 112 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 17 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 110 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 111 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 114 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 115 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 102 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 445, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 445, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 445, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
doublecortin-like kinase 1, transcript variant 1
doublecortin-like kinase 1, transcript variant 3
doublecortin-like kinase 1, transcript variant 2
doublecortin-like kinase 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 167 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
doublecortin-like kinase 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 170 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK1 isoform X1
serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK1 isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK1 isoform 3
serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK1 isoform 1
serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK1 isoform 2
doublecortin-like kinase 1, transcript variant 4
serine/threonine-protein kinase DCLK1 isoform 4
spermatogenesis and oogenesis specific basic helix-loop-helix 2, transcript variant 1
spermatogenesis- and oogenesis-specific basic helix-loop-helix-containing protein 2 isoform 1
spermatogenesis and oogenesis specific basic helix-loop-helix 2, transcript variant 2
spermatogenesis- and oogenesis-specific basic helix-loop-helix-containing protein 2 isoform 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain containing 169, transcript variant 4
coiled-coil domain containing 169, transcript variant 3
coiled-coil domain containing 169, transcript variant 2
coiled-coil domain containing 169, transcript variant 7
isoform e is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 169 isoform e
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 169 isoform c
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 169 isoform b
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain containing 169, transcript variant 6
coiled-coil domain containing 169, transcript variant 5
coiled-coil domain containing 169, transcript variant 1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 169 isoform a
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 169 isoform d
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
spastic paraplegia 20 (Troyer syndrome), transcript variant 4
spastic paraplegia 20 (Troyer syndrome), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 187 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
spastic paraplegia 20 (Troyer syndrome), transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001142295.1
spastic paraplegia 20 (Troyer syndrome), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 198 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
spastic paraplegia 20 (Troyer syndrome), transcript variant 2
spastic paraplegia 20 (Troyer syndrome), transcript variant 1
spastic paraplegia 20 (Troyer syndrome), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 190 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
spastic paraplegia 20 (Troyer syndrome), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 191 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
spastic paraplegia 20 (Troyer syndrome), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 187 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SPG20 opposite strand, transcript variant 1
SPG20 opposite strand, transcript variant 2
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
serine-rich and transmembrane domain containing 1
serine-rich and transmembrane domain-containing protein 1
SMAD family member 9, transcript variant b
SMAD family member 9, transcript variant a
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 9 isoform b
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant a; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 9 isoform a
SMAD family member 9, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
SMAD family member 9, transcript variant X4
SMAD family member 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SMAD family member 9, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 9 isoform X5
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 9 isoform X4
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 9 isoform X2
mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 9 isoform X6
ALG5, dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant 2
ALG5, dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant 1
ALG5, dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 84 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase isoform 2
dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase isoform X1
dolichyl-phosphate beta-glucosyltransferase isoform 1
exosome component 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 114 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
exosome component 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 82 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
exosome complex component RRP43 isoform X1
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001014286.2
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001278480.1
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001278481.1
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_017569.3
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001278482.1
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 161 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 156 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 245 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 147 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 153 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 143 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 173 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 170 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 165 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 140 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 219 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 151 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 137 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 134 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 144 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 130 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 150 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 138 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 130 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X11
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X12
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X10
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X8
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform a
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X5
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X6
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X7
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X18
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X16
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X9
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X1
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X2
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X3
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X4
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X19
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X20
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform c
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X21
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform b
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X15
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X14
suppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 95 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor SPT20 homolog isoform X22
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 547
periostin, osteoblast specific factor, transcript variant 7
periostin, osteoblast specific factor, transcript variant 6
periostin, osteoblast specific factor, transcript variant 4
periostin, osteoblast specific factor, transcript variant 2
periostin, osteoblast specific factor, transcript variant 3
periostin, osteoblast specific factor, transcript variant 5
periostin, osteoblast specific factor, transcript variant 1
periostin, osteoblast specific factor, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 427 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
periostin, osteoblast specific factor, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 431 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform 7 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 6 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 5 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 4, transcript variant zeta
transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 4, transcript variant gamma
transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 4, transcript variant delta
transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 4, transcript variant beta
transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 4, transcript variant alpha
transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 4, transcript variant epsilon
isoform zeta is encoded by transcript variant zeta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
short transient receptor potential channel 4 isoform zeta
isoform gamma is encoded by transcript variant gamma; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
short transient receptor potential channel 4 isoform gamma
isoform delta is encoded by transcript variant delta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
short transient receptor potential channel 4 isoform delta
isoform beta is encoded by transcript variant beta; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
short transient receptor potential channel 4 isoform beta
isoform alpha is encoded by transcript variant alpha; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
short transient receptor potential channel 4 isoform alpha
isoform epsilon is encoded by transcript variant epsilon; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
short transient receptor potential channel 4 isoform epsilon
uncharacterized LOC101929077, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC101929077, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC101929077, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized LOC101929077, transcript variant X2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 571
ubiquitin-fold modifier 1, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001286704.1
ubiquitin-fold modifier 1, transcript variant 6
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_104584.1
ubiquitin-fold modifier 1, transcript variant 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001286706.1
ubiquitin-fold modifier 1, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001286705.1
ubiquitin-fold modifier 1, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_016617.3
ubiquitin-fold modifier 1, transcript variant 7
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_104585.1
ubiquitin-fold modifier 1, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001286703.1
ubiquitin-fold modifier 1 isoform 1 precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 15% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 366
FRAS1 related extracellular matrix protein 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_207361.4
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_997244.3
FRAS1-related extracellular matrix protein 2 precursor
stomatin (EPB72)-like 3, transcript variant 1
stomatin (EPB72)-like 3, transcript variant 2
stomatin (EPB72)-like 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline and serine rich 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 168 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
proline and serine-rich protein 1 isoform X1
NHL repeat containing 3, transcript variant 1
NHL repeat containing 3, transcript variant 2
NHL repeat containing 3, transcript variant 3
NHL repeat-containing protein 3 isoform a precursor
NHL repeat-containing protein 3 isoform b
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_005780.2
lipoma HMGIC fusion partner, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
component of oligomeric golgi complex 6, transcript variant 2
component of oligomeric golgi complex 6, transcript variant 3
component of oligomeric golgi complex 6, transcript variant 1
conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 6 isoform 2
conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 6 isoform 1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 332
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 548
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 598, transcript variant TTL-B1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 598, transcript variant TTL-B2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 598, transcript variant TTL-T
28S ribosomal protein S31, mitochondrial
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; ornithine transporter) member 15
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2 pseudogene 5, transcript variant 2
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2 pseudogene 5, transcript variant 1
E74-like factor 1 (ets domain transcription factor), transcript variant 1
E74-like factor 1 (ets domain transcription factor), transcript variant 2
E74-like factor 1 (ets domain transcription factor), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 203 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
E74-like factor 1 (ets domain transcription factor), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 205 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-1 isoform b
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-1 isoform X1
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-1 isoform X2
ETS-related transcription factor Elf-1 isoform a
transfer RNA glutamic acid 20 (anticodon UUC); tRNA features were annotated by tRNAscan-SE; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
WW domain binding protein 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 72 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
kelch repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 6
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_152903.4
kelch repeat and BTB domain-containing protein 6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 54% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
kelch repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 7
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_032138.4
kelch repeat and BTB domain-containing protein 7
mitochondrial translational release factor 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial translational release factor 1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial translational release factor 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial translational release factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial translational release factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial translational release factor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
mitochondrial translational release factor 1
peptide chain release factor 1, mitochondrial
peptide chain release factor 1, mitochondrial isoform X2
peptide chain release factor 1, mitochondrial isoform X3
peptide chain release factor 1, mitochondrial isoform X4
peptide chain release factor 1, mitochondrial isoform X5
peptide chain release factor 1, mitochondrial isoform X6
mitochondrial translational release factor 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
peptide chain release factor 1, mitochondrial isoform X7
N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant 1
N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant 3
N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant 2
N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 67 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 44 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform 1
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X4
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X1
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform 3
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform 2
N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 35 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
N-alpha-acetyltransferase 16, NatA auxiliary subunit isoform X2
olfactory receptor, family 7, subfamily E, member 37 pseudogene
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 8, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_015058.1
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 8, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 89 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 8, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 86 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 8 isoform a precursor
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 8 isoform X1
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 8 isoform X2
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 8, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 8 isoform X3
von Willebrand factor A domain containing 8, transcript variant 2
von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein 8 isoform b precursor
diacylglycerol kinase, eta, transcript variant 3
diacylglycerol kinase, eta, transcript variant 2
diacylglycerol kinase, eta, transcript variant 1
diacylglycerol kinase, eta, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
diacylglycerol kinase, eta, transcript variant 4
diacylglycerol kinase, eta, transcript variant 5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 175 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 182 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 11, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 11, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 11, transcript variant 2
tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 11, transcript variant 1
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 11 isoform 1
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 11 isoform 2
family with sequence similarity 216, member B
family with sequence similarity 216, member B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 40 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
epithelial stromal interaction 1 (breast), transcript variant 2
epithelial stromal interaction 1 (breast), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 67 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
epithelial stromal interaction 1 (breast), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 69 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
epithelial stromal interaction 1 (breast), transcript variant 1
epithelial-stromal interaction protein 1 isoform X1
epithelial-stromal interaction protein 1 isoform 1
epithelial-stromal interaction protein 1 isoform 2
epithelial-stromal interaction protein 1 isoform X2
epithelial stromal interaction 1 (breast), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
epithelial-stromal interaction protein 1 isoform X3
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 15
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 51 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 70 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 48 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 47 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant 3
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant 1
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1, transcript variant 2
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1 isoform X1
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1 isoform X2
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1 isoform X3
ecto-NOX disulfide-thiol exchanger 1 isoform X4
coiled-coil domain containing 122, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 122
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 122 isoform X2
laccase (multicopper oxidoreductase) domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
laccase (multicopper oxidoreductase) domain containing 1, transcript variant 1
laccase (multicopper oxidoreductase) domain containing 1, transcript variant 2
laccase (multicopper oxidoreductase) domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
laccase (multicopper oxidoreductase) domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 34 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
laccase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
laccase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
laccase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 284
SMIM2 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
SMIM2 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
SMIM2 intronic transcript 1 (non-protein coding)
stress-associated endoplasmic reticulum protein family member 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001010897.1
stress-associated endoplasmic reticulum protein 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 18% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1071
TSC22 domain family, member 1, transcript variant 5
TSC22 domain family, member 1, transcript variant 1
TSC22 domain family, member 1, transcript variant 4
TSC22 domain family, member 1, transcript variant 3
TSC22 domain family, member 1, transcript variant 2
TSC22 domain family, member 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 650 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
TSC22 domain family protein 1 isoform X3
TSC22 domain family, member 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 104 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
TSC22 domain family, member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 107 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
TSC22 domain family protein 1 isoform X2
TSC22 domain family protein 1 isoform X1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 330
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_038433.2
transfer RNA glutamic acid 7 (anticodon UUC); tRNA features were annotated by tRNAscan-SE; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
nuclear fragile X mental retardation protein interacting protein 1
nuclear fragile X mental retardation-interacting protein 1
GPALPP motifs containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 50 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
GPALPP motifs containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 54 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
GPALPP motifs-containing protein 1 isoform X1
GPALPP motifs-containing protein 1 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 2% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
general transcription factor IIF, polypeptide 2, 30kDa
general transcription factor IIF subunit 2
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 4
tumor protein, translationally-controlled 1, transcript variant 3
tumor protein, translationally-controlled 1, transcript variant 2
tumor protein, translationally-controlled 1, transcript variant 1
translationally-controlled tumor protein isoform 2
translationally-controlled tumor protein isoform 3
translationally-controlled tumor protein isoform 1
solute carrier family 25, member 30, transcript variant 2
solute carrier family 25, member 30, transcript variant 1
solute carrier family 25, member 30, transcript variant 3
kidney mitochondrial carrier protein 1 isoform 1
kidney mitochondrial carrier protein 1 isoform 2
kidney mitochondrial carrier protein 1 isoform 3
solute carrier family 25, member 30, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25, member 30, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25, member 30, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
solute carrier family 25, member 30, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
kidney mitochondrial carrier protein 1 isoform X1
kidney mitochondrial carrier protein 1 isoform X8
kidney mitochondrial carrier protein 1 isoform X9
kidney mitochondrial carrier protein 1 isoform X7
solute carrier family 25, member 30, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
kidney mitochondrial carrier protein 1 isoform X2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_031431.3
The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
component of oligomeric golgi complex 3, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 99 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
component of oligomeric golgi complex 3, transcript variant X8
component of oligomeric golgi complex 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 90 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
component of oligomeric golgi complex 3, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 143 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_113619.2
conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 3
conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 3 isoform X8
conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 3 isoform X9
family with sequence similarity 194, member B
spermatid associated, transcript variant 1
spermatid associated, transcript variant 2
spermatid associated, transcript variant 3
spermatid associated, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 45 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
siah E3 ubiquitin protein ligase family member 3
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 215 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 230 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 210 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 225 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 219 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 214 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 207 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 218 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 213 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 210 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 207 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13 isoform X11
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13 isoform X10
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13 isoform X8
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13 isoform X9
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13 isoform X7
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13 isoform X1
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13 isoform X2
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13 isoform X3
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13 isoform X4
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13 isoform X5
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13 isoform X6
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 132 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13
zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13 isoform X12
CPB2 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
CPB2 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
carboxypeptidase B2 (plasma), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 35 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
carboxypeptidase B2 (plasma), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 45 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
carboxypeptidase B2 (plasma), transcript variant 2
carboxypeptidase B2 (plasma), transcript variant 1
isoform 2 preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
carboxypeptidase B2 isoform 2 preproprotein
isoform 1 preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
carboxypeptidase B2 isoform 1 preproprotein
carboxypeptidase B2 (plasma), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1 (L-plastin)
lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1 (L-plastin), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 441 ESTs, 24 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 63
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 563
uncharacterized protein KIAA0226-like isoform b
isoform e is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized protein KIAA0226-like isoform e
uncharacterized protein KIAA0226-like isoform c
uncharacterized protein KIAA0226-like isoform a
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized protein KIAA0226-like isoform d
isoform f is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
uncharacterized protein KIAA0226-like isoform f
uncharacterized LOC101929344, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC101929344, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
leucine-rich repeats and calponin homology (CH) domain containing 1, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001164213.1
leucine-rich repeats and calponin homology (CH) domain containing 1, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001164211.1
leucine-rich repeats and calponin homology (CH) domain containing 1, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_015116.2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001157685.1
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 3; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform 3
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001157683.1
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform 1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_055931.1
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
leucine-rich repeat and calponin homology domain-containing protein 1 isoform 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 194 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
S-formylglutathione hydrolase isoform X1
5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 2A, G protein-coupled, transcript variant 2
5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 2A, G protein-coupled, transcript variant 1
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2A isoform 2
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2A isoform 1
HTR2A antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
HTR2A antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
succinate-CoA ligase, ADP-forming, beta subunit
succinyl-CoA ligase [ADP-forming] subunit beta, mitochondrial precursor
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 31% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
nudix (nucleoside diphosphate linked moiety X)-type motif 15
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_018283.1
probable 8-oxo-dGTP diphosphatase NUDT15
mediator complex subunit 4, transcript variant 2
mediator complex subunit 4, transcript variant 1
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 4 isoform 1
mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 4 isoform 2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 441
lysophosphatidic acid receptor 6, transcript variant 1
lysophosphatidic acid receptor 6, transcript variant 2
lysophosphatidic acid receptor 6, transcript variant 3
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 2, transcript variant 4
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 2, transcript variant 3
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 2, transcript variant 1
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 2, transcript variant 2
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 68 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 65 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 66 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 65 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 2 isoform 1
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 2 isoform 2
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 2 isoform X6
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 2 isoform X5
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 2 isoform 3
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 2 isoform 4
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 462
fibronectin type III domain containing 3A, transcript variant 1
fibronectin type III domain containing 3A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 236 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
fibronectin type III domain containing 3A, transcript variant 3
fibronectin type III domain containing 3A, transcript variant 4
fibronectin type-III domain-containing protein 3A isoform 1
fibronectin type-III domain-containing protein 3A isoform X1
fibronectin type III domain containing 3A, transcript variant 2
fibronectin type-III domain-containing protein 3A isoform 2
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant 1
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant 2
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant 3
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 41 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform 2
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform 1
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 40 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 38 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 36 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 36 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X3
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X4
cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain-containing protein 1 isoform X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
calcium binding protein 39-like, transcript variant 2
calcium binding protein 39-like, transcript variant 1
calcium binding protein 39-like, transcript variant 4
calcium binding protein 39-like, transcript variant 3
calcium binding protein 39-like, transcript variant 5
SET domain, bifurcated 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 61 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain, bifurcated 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 43 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain, bifurcated 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 41 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain, bifurcated 2, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 30 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain, bifurcated 2, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain, bifurcated 2, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain, bifurcated 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain, bifurcated 2, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain, bifurcated 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
SET domain, bifurcated 2, transcript variant 1
SET domain, bifurcated 2, transcript variant 2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform a
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X1
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform b
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X3
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X8
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X9
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X6
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X2
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB2 isoform X5
PHD finger protein 11, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 44 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
PHD finger protein 11, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
PHD finger protein 11, transcript variant 1
PHD finger protein 11, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 139 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
PHD finger protein 11, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 139 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
PHD finger protein 11, transcript variant 2
PHD finger protein 11, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 137 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
PHD finger protein 11, transcript variant X1
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 125 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 1
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 111 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 1
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 1 isoform X2
RCC1 and BTB domain-containing protein 1 isoform X6
regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) and BTB (POZ) domain containing protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylation factor-like 11, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 11 isoform X1
emopamil binding protein-like, transcript variant 4
emopamil binding protein-like, transcript variant 1
emopamil binding protein-like, transcript variant 2
emopamil binding protein-like, transcript variant 3
SPRY domain containing 7, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_023351.1
SPRY domain containing 7, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001127482.1
SPRY domain containing 7, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_020456.2
SPRY domain-containing protein 7 isoform 2
SPRY domain-containing protein 7 isoform 1
deleted in lymphocytic leukemia 2 (non-protein coding)
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant 3
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant 4
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant 2
tripartite motif containing 13, transcript variant 1
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM13 isoform 2
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase TRIM13 isoform 1
isoform 1 is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
potassium channel regulator, transcript variant 2
potassium channel regulator, transcript variant 1
potassium channel regulatory protein isoform 1
potassium channel regulatory protein isoform 2
deleted in lymphocytic leukemia 1 (non-protein coding), transcript variant 3
deleted in lymphocytic leukemia 1 (non-protein coding), transcript variant 1
deleted in lymphocytic leukemia 1 (non-protein coding), transcript variant 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
suppression of tumorigenicity 13 (colon carcinoma) (Hsp70 interacting protein) pseudogene 4
deleted in lymphocytic leukemia, 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
leukemia-associated protein 7 isoform X1
deleted in lymphocytic leukemia, 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
leukemia-associated protein 7 isoform X2
ribonuclease H2, subunit B, transcript variant 2
ribonuclease H2, subunit B, transcript variant 1
ribonuclease H2, subunit B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 54 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribonuclease H2, subunit B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 54 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
ribonuclease H2, subunit B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 38 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanylate cyclase 1, soluble, beta 2 (pseudogene)
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 371, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_102431.1
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions and aligns at 84% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 371, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_102432.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 75% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
family with sequence similarity 124A, transcript variant 1
family with sequence similarity 124A, transcript variant 2
serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade E (nexin, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1), member 3
integrator complex subunit 6, transcript variant 2
integrator complex subunit 6, transcript variant 1
integrator complex subunit 6, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 181 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 6, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 132 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrator complex subunit 6, transcript variant 3
WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 57 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
WD repeat and FYVE domain-containing protein 2
WD repeat and FYVE domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 12, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X4
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 12, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 42 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 12, transcript variant 2
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 12, transcript variant 3
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform 3
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X2
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform 2
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 12, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X6
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 12, transcript variant 1
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X1
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform 1
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 12, transcript variant X5
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X5
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 12, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X3
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X5
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X8
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X10
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X9
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X11
uncharacterized LOC102723770, transcript variant X4
dynein heavy chain-like, transcript variant X3
dynein heavy chain-like, transcript variant X2
dynein heavy chain-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
dynein heavy chain-like, transcript variant X5
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 12, transcript variant X7
dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 12 isoform X7
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 282, transcript variant 2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 282, transcript variant 1
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 70 precursor
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 70 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 67 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 67 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 67 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 64 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant 3
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant 2
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant 1
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 70 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 70 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 70 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 70 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 58 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, Cu++ transporting, beta polypeptide, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 64 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
copper-transporting ATPase 2 isoform X10
copper-transporting ATPase 2 isoform X11
copper-transporting ATPase 2 isoform X13
copper-transporting ATPase 2 isoform X12
ALG11, alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferase, transcript variant B
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_036571.2
ALG11, alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferase, transcript variant A
GDP-Man:Man(3)GlcNAc(2)-PP-Dol alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferase
UTP14, U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein, homolog C (yeast)
U3 small nucleolar RNA-associated protein 14 homolog C
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek5-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek5-like isoform X1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_199289.1
The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
NIMA-related kinase 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek5 isoform X1
NIMA-related kinase 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek5 isoform X2
NIMA-related kinase 5, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek5 isoform X3
NIMA-related kinase 3, transcript variant 1
NIMA-related kinase 3, transcript variant 2
serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek3 isoform a
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S31 pseudogene 5, transcript variant 3
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S31 pseudogene 5, transcript variant 4
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S31 pseudogene 5, transcript variant 2
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S31 pseudogene 5, transcript variant 1
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2 pseudogene 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
thrombospondin, type I, domain containing 1, transcript variant 2
thrombospondin, type I, domain containing 1, transcript variant 1
thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing protein 1 isoform 2 precursor
thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing protein 1 isoform 1 precursor
vacuolar protein sorting 36 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 2
vacuolar protein sorting 36 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 1
vacuolar protein sorting 36 homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 3
vacuolar protein-sorting-associated protein 36 isoform 2
vacuolar protein-sorting-associated protein 36 isoform 1
vacuolar protein-sorting-associated protein 36 isoform 3
cytoskeleton associated protein 2, transcript variant 2
cytoskeleton associated protein 2, transcript variant 1
cytoskeleton associated protein 2, transcript variant 4
cytoskeleton-associated protein 2 isoform 2
cytoskeleton-associated protein 2 isoform 1
cytoskeleton-associated protein 2 isoform 4
cytoskeleton associated protein 2, transcript variant 3
cytoskeleton associated protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 115 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoskeleton-associated protein 2 isoform X1
cytoskeleton associated protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 115 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
cytoskeleton-associated protein 2 isoform X2
cytoskeleton-associated protein 2 isoform 3
transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog 2 pseudogene 3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_002793.1
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1-like 2, transcript variant 1
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1-like 2, transcript variant 2
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1-like 2
SGT1, suppressor of G2 allele of SKP1 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 1B
SGT1, suppressor of G2 allele of SKP1 (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 1A
isoform SGT1B is encoded by transcript variant 1B; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
suppressor of G2 allele of SKP1 homolog isoform SGT1B
isoform SGT1A is encoded by transcript variant 1A; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
suppressor of G2 allele of SKP1 homolog isoform SGT1A
leukocyte cell derived chemotaxin 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
leukocyte cell derived chemotaxin 1, transcript variant X1
leukocyte cell derived chemotaxin 1, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001011705.1
leukocyte cell derived chemotaxin 1, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_007015.2
leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 1 isoform 2 precursor
leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 1 isoform 1 precursor
leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 1 isoform X2
leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 1 isoform X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 558
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 458, transcript variant 1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 458, transcript variant 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 142 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 131 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 3% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
diaphanous-related formin 3, transcript variant 5
diaphanous-related formin 3, transcript variant 4
diaphanous-related formin 3, transcript variant 3
diaphanous-related formin 3, transcript variant 1
diaphanous-related formin 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 33 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
isoform e is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform d is encoded by transcript variant 4; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
diaphanous-related formin 3, transcript variant 6
diaphanous-related formin 3, transcript variant 2
isoform f is encoded by transcript variant 6; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
diaphanous-related formin 3, transcript variant 7
isoform g is encoded by transcript variant 7; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DIAPH3 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
DIAPH3 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
DIAPH3 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 3
DIAPH3 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 4
DIAPH3 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 5
tudor domain containing 3, transcript variant 3
tudor domain containing 3, transcript variant 2
tudor domain containing 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 82 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tudor domain containing 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 85 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor domain containing 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor domain containing 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 78 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor domain containing 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor domain containing 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 96 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
tudor domain containing 3, transcript variant 1
tudor domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
tudor domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
tudor domain-containing protein 3 isoform 1
tudor domain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
tudor domain-containing protein 3 isoform X5
tudor domain-containing protein 3 isoform 2
isoform 2 is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 378
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 358
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 395
olfactory receptor, family 7, subfamily E, member 156 pseudogene
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 Proteins
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 22% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 82 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 81 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 78 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927072, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927072, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 550
kelch-like family member 1, transcript variant 2
kelch-like family member 1, transcript variant 1
ATXN8 opposite strand (non-protein coding)
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 348
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_047699.1
The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 88% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
dachshund homolog 1 (Drosophila), transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_004392.5
dachshund homolog 1 (Drosophila), transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_080760.4
dachshund homolog 1 (Drosophila), transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_080759.4
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_004383.3
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 3; The RefSeq protein has 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_542938.2
isoform b is encoded by transcript variant 2; The RefSeq protein has 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_542937.2
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 1; The RefSeq protein has 1 indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
bora, aurora kinase A activator, transcript variant 1
bora, aurora kinase A activator, transcript variant 3
bora, aurora kinase A activator, transcript variant 2
bora, aurora kinase A activator, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 38 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DIS3 mitotic control homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 1
DIS3 mitotic control homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant 2
DIS3 mitotic control homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 111 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
DIS3 mitotic control homolog (S. cerevisiae), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 110 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
exosome complex exonuclease RRP44 isoform a
exosome complex exonuclease RRP44 isoform b
exosome complex exonuclease RRP44 isoform X2
exosome complex exonuclease RRP44 isoform X1
progesterone immunomodulatory binding factor 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_006346.2
progesterone immunomodulatory binding factor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
progesterone immunomodulatory binding factor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
progesterone-induced-blocking factor 1 isoform X1
progesterone-induced-blocking factor 1 isoform X2
progesterone immunomodulatory binding factor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
progesterone-induced-blocking factor 1 isoform X3
Kruppel-like factor 5 (intestinal), transcript variant 2
Kruppel-like factor 5 (intestinal), transcript variant 1
Kruppel-like factor 5 (intestinal), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 114 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Kruppel-like factor 5 (intestinal), transcript variant X2
Kruppel-like factor 12, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 135 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Kruppel-like factor 12, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 129 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Kruppel-like factor 12, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 130 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC101927121, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC101927121, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927121, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 381
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 347, transcript variant 1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 347, transcript variant 2
TBC1 domain family, member 4, transcript variant 3
TBC1 domain family, member 4, transcript variant 2
TBC1 domain family, member 4, transcript variant 1
TBC1 domain family, member 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 121 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family, member 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 124 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family, member 4, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 111 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
TBC1 domain family, member 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 113 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
COMM domain containing 6, transcript variant 1
COMM domain containing 6, transcript variant 5
COMM domain containing 6, transcript variant 2
COMM domain containing 6, transcript variant 4
COMM domain containing 6, transcript variant 3
COMM domain containing 6, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
COMM domain-containing protein 6 isoform b
COMM domain-containing protein 6 isoform a
COMM domain-containing protein 6 isoform X1
COMM domain-containing protein 6 isoform c
isoform c is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L3 (ubiquitin thiolesterase), transcript variant 1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L3 (ubiquitin thiolesterase), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L3 (ubiquitin thiolesterase), transcript variant 2
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L3 (ubiquitin thiolesterase), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L3 (ubiquitin thiolesterase), transcript variant X3
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L3 isoform 2
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L3 isoform X1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L3 isoform X3
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L3 isoform 1
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L3 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 130 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 130 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 135 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 139 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 134 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 163 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 135 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 135 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 135 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 132 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 160 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 137 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 165 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 134 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 154 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 129 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 132 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 137 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 129 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 129 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 127 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 121 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 12
BTB/POZ domain-containing protein KCTD12
basic transcription factor 3 pseudogene 11
ceroid-lipofuscinosis neuronal protein 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_012158.2
The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 161 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 171 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 255 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 256 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 254 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 253 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 253 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 255 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 253 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 259 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 255 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 254 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 254 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 258 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
MYC binding protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, transcript variant X3
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X8
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X2
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X12
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X11
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X6
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X10
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X9
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X13
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X1
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X5
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X7
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X4
probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MYCBP2 isoform X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 71 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 70 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 65 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 Proteins, and 47% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
putative UPF0607 protein ENSP00000383144
SLAIN motif family, member 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 122 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLAIN motif family, member 1, transcript variant 3
SLAIN motif-containing protein 1 isoform X1
SLAIN motif-containing protein 1 isoform C
SLAIN motif family, member 1, transcript variant 1
SLAIN motif-containing protein 1 isoform A precursor
SLAIN motif family, member 1, transcript variant 4
SLAIN motif family, member 1, transcript variant 6
SLAIN motif family, member 1, transcript variant 2
SLAIN motif family, member 1, transcript variant 5
SLAIN motif-containing protein 1 isoform B
SLAIN motif-containing protein 1 isoform D
SLAIN motif-containing protein 1 isoform E
endothelin receptor type B, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_000115.3
endothelin receptor type B, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001201397.1
endothelin receptor type B, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_003991.3
endothelin receptor type B, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001122659.2
endothelin B receptor isoform 2 precursor
endothelin B receptor isoform 1 precursor
isoform 1 precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
endothelin receptor type B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1069
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 446
POU domain, class 4, transcription factor 1
ring finger protein 219, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 76 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 331
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_046869.2
The RefSeq transcript aligns at 81% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 137 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 135 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 165 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 182 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 mRNAs, 189 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 184 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 171 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 178 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 177 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 175 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 170 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 182 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 170 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 125 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant 3
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant 2
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant 1
RNA binding motif protein 26, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 84 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
Nedd4 family interacting protein 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 199 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
Nedd4 family interacting protein 2, transcript variant 1
Nedd4 family interacting protein 2, transcript variant 2
Nedd4 family interacting protein 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
NEDD4 family-interacting protein 2 isoform 1
NEDD4 family-interacting protein 2 isoform 2
NEDD4 family-interacting protein 2 isoform X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927195, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 43% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC101927195, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC101927195, transcript variant X2
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1080
uncharacterized LOC101927216, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC101927216, transcript variant X1
sprouty homolog 2 (Drosophila), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 82 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
sprouty homolog 2 (Drosophila), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 85 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
sprouty homolog 2 (Drosophila), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 87 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT and NTRK-like family, member 1, transcript variant 2
SLIT and NTRK-like family, member 1, transcript variant 1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 333
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_046871.1
The RefSeq transcript aligns at 92% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 351
SLIT and NTRK-like family, member 5, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 34 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
SLIT and NTRK-like family, member 5, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 397
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 433
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 560
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 353
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 559
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 410
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 380
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 379
miR-17-92 cluster host gene (non-protein coding), transcript variant 1
miR-17-92 cluster host gene (non-protein coding), transcript variant 2
GPC5 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
GPC5 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 3
GPC5 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 97 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
dopachrome tautomerase, transcript variant 1
dopachrome tautomerase, transcript variant 2
L-dopachrome tautomerase isoform 1 precursor
L-dopachrome tautomerase isoform 2 precursor
transfer RNA phenylalanine 6 (anticodon GAA); tRNA features were annotated by tRNAscan-SE; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: tRNAscan-SE.
integral membrane protein GPR180 precursor
uncharacterized LOC101927248, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC101927248, transcript variant X1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_007084.2
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 4, transcript variant 1
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 4, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 130 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 127 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 isoform X2
multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 isoform 1
multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 isoform X1
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 4, transcript variant 2
multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 isoform 2
isoform a_i1 is encoded by transcript variant a_v1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform b precursor is encoded by transcript variant b; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant 1
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant 2
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 120 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 46 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 3
dnaJ homolog subfamily C member 3 precursor
UDP-glucose glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 2
UDP-glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 2 precursor
heparan-sulfate 6-O-sulfotransferase 3 precursor
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 359
oxoglutarate (alpha-ketoglutarate) receptor 1
oxoglutarate (alpha-ketoglutarate) receptor 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
oxoglutarate (alpha-ketoglutarate) receptor 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
oxoglutarate (alpha-ketoglutarate) receptor 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
oxoglutarate (alpha-ketoglutarate) receptor 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind-like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 280 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind-like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 285 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind-like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 287 ESTs, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind-like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 286 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind-like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 287 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind-like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 287 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
muscleblind-like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant 1
muscleblind-like splicing regulator 2, transcript variant 3
uncharacterized LOC101927385, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927385, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 953 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 973 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 940 ESTs, 18 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
FERM, RhoGEF (ARHGEF) and pleckstrin domain protein 1 (chondrocyte-derived), transcript variant 3
FERM, RhoGEF (ARHGEF) and pleckstrin domain protein 1 (chondrocyte-derived), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 261 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
FERM, RhoGEF (ARHGEF) and pleckstrin domain protein 1 (chondrocyte-derived), transcript variant 1
FERM, RhoGEF (ARHGEF) and pleckstrin domain protein 1 (chondrocyte-derived), transcript variant 2
FERM, RhoGEF and pleckstrin domain-containing protein 1 isoform 3
FERM, RhoGEF and pleckstrin domain-containing protein 1 isoform 1
FERM, RhoGEF and pleckstrin domain-containing protein 1 isoform X1
FERM, RhoGEF and pleckstrin domain-containing protein 1 isoform 2
serine/threonine kinase 24, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001286649.1
serine/threonine kinase 24, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001032296.3
serine/threonine kinase 24, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_003576.4
serine/threonine kinase 24, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 307 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
serine/threonine kinase 24, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 308 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform c precursor is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
serine/threonine-protein kinase 24 isoform c precursor
serine/threonine-protein kinase 24 isoform b precursor
serine/threonine-protein kinase 24 isoform a precursor
serine/threonine-protein kinase 24 isoform X2
serine/threonine-protein kinase 24 isoform X3
solute carrier family 15 (oligopeptide transporter), member 1
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant 1
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 173 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X19
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 181 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 171 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 177 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 175 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 172 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X20
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 173 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 170 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X18
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 181 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 177 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 175 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 171 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 176 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 169 ESTs, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 168 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 172 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 162 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 179 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant 2
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 174 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X21
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 169 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X22
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 169 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X2
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X19
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X13
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X1
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X6
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X20
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X12
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X18
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X10
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X15
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X11
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X9
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X8
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X5
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X4
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X14
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X7
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X21
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X22
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X3
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform a
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X17
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform b
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 82 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X16
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X23
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 44 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X23
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant 3
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant 4
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform c
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform d
dedicator of cytokinesis 9, transcript variant X24
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9 isoform X24
UBAC2 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
UBAC2 antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
UBA domain containing 2, transcript variant 1
UBA domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 383 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBA domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 133 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBA domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 256 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
UBA domain containing 2, transcript variant 3
UBA domain containing 2, transcript variant 2
ubiquitin-associated domain-containing protein 2 isoform 1 precursor
ubiquitin-associated domain-containing protein 2 isoform X1
ubiquitin-associated domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
ubiquitin-associated domain-containing protein 2 isoform 2
ubiquitin-associated domain-containing protein 2 isoform X2
G protein-coupled receptor 18, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
G protein-coupled receptor 18, transcript variant 2
G protein-coupled receptor 18, transcript variant 1
N-arachidonyl glycine receptor isoform X1
transmembrane 9 superfamily member 2 precursor
citrate lyase beta like, transcript variant 2
citrate lyase beta like, transcript variant 1
citrate lyase beta like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
citrate lyase beta like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
citrate lyase beta like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
citrate lyase subunit beta-like protein, mitochondrial isoform X1
citrate lyase subunit beta-like protein, mitochondrial isoform X3
citrate lyase subunit beta-like protein, mitochondrial precursor
citrate lyase subunit beta-like protein, mitochondrial isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC101927465, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927465, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
uncharacterized LOC101927465, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927465, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, and 7% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 554
propionyl CoA carboxylase, alpha polypeptide, transcript variant 1
propionyl CoA carboxylase, alpha polypeptide, transcript variant 3
propionyl CoA carboxylase, alpha polypeptide, transcript variant 2
propionyl CoA carboxylase, alpha polypeptide, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 154 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
propionyl-CoA carboxylase alpha chain, mitochondrial isoform a precursor
propionyl-CoA carboxylase alpha chain, mitochondrial isoform c precursor
propionyl-CoA carboxylase alpha chain, mitochondrial isoform b
propionyl-CoA carboxylase alpha chain, mitochondrial isoform X1
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant 2
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant 1
gamma-glutamylamine cyclotransferase, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 31 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-glutamylaminecyclotransferase isoform X1
transmembrane and tetratricopeptide repeat containing 4, transcript variant 3
transmembrane and tetratricopeptide repeat containing 4, transcript variant 2
transmembrane and tetratricopeptide repeat containing 4, transcript variant 1
transmembrane and tetratricopeptide repeat containing 4, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 125 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and tetratricopeptide repeat containing 4, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 115 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and tetratricopeptide repeat containing 4, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 109 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and TPR repeat-containing protein 4 isoform 1
transmembrane and TPR repeat-containing protein 4 isoform 3
transmembrane and TPR repeat-containing protein 4 isoform 2
transmembrane and TPR repeat-containing protein 4 isoform X4
transmembrane and TPR repeat-containing protein 4 isoform X3
transmembrane and TPR repeat-containing protein 4 isoform X5
transmembrane and tetratricopeptide repeat containing 4, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 101 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and TPR repeat-containing protein 4 isoform X1
sodium leak channel, non-selective, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 70 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sodium leak channel, non-selective, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 71 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sodium leak channel, non-selective, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 71 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
sodium leak channel non-selective protein isoform X2
sodium leak channel non-selective protein isoform X1
sodium leak channel non-selective protein isoform X3
sodium leak channel non-selective protein
integrin, beta-like 1 (with EGF-like repeat domains), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 128 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
integrin, beta-like 1 (with EGF-like repeat domains), transcript variant 4
integrin, beta-like 1 (with EGF-like repeat domains), transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_004791.2
integrin, beta-like 1 (with EGF-like repeat domains), transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001271755.1
integrin beta-like protein 1 isoform 1 precursor
integrin beta-like protein 1 isoform 2 precursor
integrin, beta-like 1 (with EGF-like repeat domains), transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001271756.1
fibroblast growth factor 14, transcript variant 2
fibroblast growth factor 14, transcript variant 1
isoform 1B is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
isoform 1A is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
FGF14 intronic transcript 1 (non-protein coding)
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripeptidyl peptidase II, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 255 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripeptidyl peptidase II, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 253 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripeptidyl peptidase II, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 275 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripeptidyl peptidase II, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 263 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
tripeptidyl peptidase II, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 170 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
protein-lysine methyltransferase METTL21C
coiled-coil domain-containing protein 168
testis expressed 30, transcript variant 4
testis expressed 30, transcript variant 3
testis expressed 30, transcript variant 2
testis expressed 30, transcript variant 1
testis expressed 30, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 86 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
testis-expressed sequence 30 protein isoform 1
testis-expressed sequence 30 protein isoform X1
testis-expressed sequence 30 protein isoform 3
testis-expressed sequence 30 protein isoform 2
KDEL (Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu) containing 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 80 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
KDEL (Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu) containing 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 59 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
KDEL (Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu) containing 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 72 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
KDEL motif-containing protein 1 isoform X1
KDEL motif-containing protein 1 isoform X2
KDEL motif-containing protein 1 precursor
KDEL motif-containing protein 1 isoform X3
basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing, transcript variant 1
basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001204425.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001191354.1
The RefSeq protein has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
basic immunoglobulin-like variable motif-containing protein isoform a
basic immunoglobulin-like variable motif-containing protein isoform b
excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_000123.3
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_000114.2
DNA repair protein complementing XP-G cells
solute carrier family 10 (sodium/bile acid cotransporter), member 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_000452.2
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_000443.1
D-amino acid oxidase activator, transcript variant 3
D-amino acid oxidase activator, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 Proteins
D-amino acid oxidase activator, transcript variant 2
D-amino acid oxidase activator, transcript variant 1
D-amino acid oxidase activator isoform 1
D-amino acid oxidase activator isoform X1
D-amino acid oxidase activator isoform 2
D-amino acid oxidase activator isoform 3
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 343
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 344
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 460
arginine and glutamate rich 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 202 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine and glutamate rich 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 240 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
arginine and glutamate rich 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 172 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 551
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 443
family with sequence similarity 155, member A
FAM155A intronic transcript 1 (non-protein coding)
ligase IV, DNA, ATP-dependent, transcript variant 3
ligase IV, DNA, ATP-dependent, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ligase IV, DNA, ATP-dependent, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ligase IV, DNA, ATP-dependent, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ligase IV, DNA, ATP-dependent, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 43 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ligase IV, DNA, ATP-dependent, transcript variant 2
ligase IV, DNA, ATP-dependent, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 41 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ligase IV, DNA, ATP-dependent, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ligase IV, DNA, ATP-dependent, transcript variant 1
alpha/beta hydrolase domain-containing protein 13
tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 13b, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 13b, transcript variant 1
tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 13b, transcript variant 2
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B isoform 1
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B isoform 2
tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B isoform X1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_015011.1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001198950.1
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 676
uncharacterized LOC101927646, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927646, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
uncharacterized LOC101927646, transcript variant X2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001845.4
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_001836.2
The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; collagen alpha-1(IV) chain preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collagen alpha-1(IV) chain preproprotein
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001846.2
collagen alpha-2(IV) chain preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
collagen alpha-2(IV) chain preproprotein
uncharacterized LOC102724442, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC102724442, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 48% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_017817.1
carbohydrate kinase domain containing, transcript variant 3
carbohydrate kinase domain containing, transcript variant 5
carbohydrate kinase domain containing, transcript variant 6
carbohydrate kinase domain containing, transcript variant 4
carbohydrate kinase domain containing, transcript variant 1
carbohydrate kinase domain containing, transcript variant 2
ATP-dependent (S)-NAD(P)H-hydrate dehydratase isoform d
ATP-dependent (S)-NAD(P)H-hydrate dehydratase isoform c
ATP-dependent (S)-NAD(P)H-hydrate dehydratase isoform b
ATP-dependent (S)-NAD(P)H-hydrate dehydratase isoform a
cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial (putative)
cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial (putative), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 171 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial (putative), transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 177 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial (putative), transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 181 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial (putative), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 146 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial (putative), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 178 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
probable cysteine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial
probable cysteine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial isoform X6
inhibitor of growth family, member 1, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_198217.2
inhibitor of growth family, member 1, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_198219.2
inhibitor of growth family, member 1, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_198218.2
inhibitor of growth family, member 1, transcript variant 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_005537.4
inhibitor of growth family, member 1, transcript variant 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001267728.1
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_005528.3
isoform D is encoded by transcript variant 4; The RefSeq protein has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 346
ankyrin repeat domain 10, transcript variant 1
ankyrin repeat domain 10, transcript variant 4
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 10 isoform 1
ankyrin repeat domain 10, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001286721.1
ankyrin repeat domain 10, transcript variant 3
similar to RNA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NR_104586.1
ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 10 isoform 2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 4% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant 3
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant 2
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant 4
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 161 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 168 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 173 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 174 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 mRNAs, 178 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 180 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X2
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X13
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X3
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X4
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X5
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X7
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform c
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform b
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform d
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X17
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, and 33% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 167 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 206 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 166 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant 1
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 166 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X14
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X15
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 166 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X16
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 161 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 167 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant 5
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 172 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 7, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 179 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X6
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X8
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X10
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X11
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X15
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X16
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X9
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform X12
rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 isoform a
isoform a is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_152324.1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 403
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 39% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1070
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1043
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 23% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
sperm acrosome associated 7, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 20 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
sperm acrosome associated 7, transcript variant X2
sperm acrosome associated 7, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
sperm acrosome associated 7, transcript variant X4
sperm acrosome associated 7, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 3, transcript variant 2
tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 3, transcript variant 1
gamma-tubulin complex component 3 isoform 2
gamma-tubulin complex component 3 isoform 1
tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 3, transcript variant 3
tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 77 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
gamma-tubulin complex component 3 isoform 3
gamma-tubulin complex component 3 isoform X3
tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 3, transcript variant 4
gamma-tubulin complex component 3 isoform 4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_207440.1
putative uncharacterized protein C13orf35
ATPase, class VI, type 11A, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 253 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class VI, type 11A, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 252 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class VI, type 11A, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 252 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class VI, type 11A, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class VI, type 11A, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class VI, type 11A, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class VI, type 11A, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, class VI, type 11A, transcript variant 1
ATPase, class VI, type 11A, transcript variant 2
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform X1
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform b
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform X2
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform X3
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform X5
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform X7
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform X8
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform X9
probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IH isoform a
ATP11A antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 1
ATP11A antisense RNA 1, transcript variant 2
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 105 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform X3
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 106 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X14
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 105 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 107 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X9
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform X1
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform X2
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform X9
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 125 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant 1
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform X11
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform a
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 103 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform X6
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 106 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 44 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform X4
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform X8
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant 2
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 41 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform b precursor
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform X10
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 101 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform X12
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 123 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform X7
MCF.2 cell line derived transforming sequence-like, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 101 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
guanine nucleotide exchange factor DBS isoform X13
coagulation factor VII (serum prothrombin conversion accelerator), transcript variant 1
coagulation factor VII (serum prothrombin conversion accelerator), transcript variant 2
coagulation factor VII (serum prothrombin conversion accelerator), transcript variant 4
coagulation factor VII (serum prothrombin conversion accelerator), transcript variant 3
coagulation factor VII (serum prothrombin conversion accelerator), transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform a preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coagulation factor VII isoform a preproprotein
isoform b preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coagulation factor VII isoform b preproprotein
isoform c preproprotein is encoded by transcript variant 3; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
coagulation factor VII isoform c preproprotein
coagulation factor X, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 41 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
coagulation factor X, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
coagulation factor X preproprotein preproprotein; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
protein Z, vitamin K-dependent plasma glycoprotein, transcript variant 1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001256134.1
protein Z, vitamin K-dependent plasma glycoprotein, transcript variant 2
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_003891.2
vitamin K-dependent protein Z isoform 1 precursor
vitamin K-dependent protein Z isoform 2 precursor
PCI domain containing 2, transcript variant 3
PCI domain containing 2, transcript variant 2
PCI domain containing 2, transcript variant 1
PCI domain containing 2, transcript variant 4
PCI domain containing 2, transcript variant 5
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001258213.1
PCI domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 91 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
PCI domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 59 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
PCI domain-containing protein 2 isoform 1
PCI domain-containing protein 2 isoform 2
isoform 3 is encoded by transcript variant 5; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
PCI domain-containing protein 2 isoform 3
PCI domain-containing protein 2 isoform X3
PCI domain-containing protein 2 isoform X5
PCI domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 143 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
PCI domain-containing protein 2 isoform X4
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_001278513.1
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_005561.3
lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 1 precursor
growth hormone regulated TBC protein 1, transcript variant 3
growth hormone regulated TBC protein 1, transcript variant 1
growth hormone regulated TBC protein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
growth hormone regulated TBC protein 1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
growth hormone regulated TBC protein 1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
growth hormone-regulated TBC protein 1 isoform 3
growth hormone-regulated TBC protein 1 isoform 1
growth hormone regulated TBC protein 1, transcript variant 2
growth hormone-regulated TBC protein 1 isoform X1
growth hormone-regulated TBC protein 1 isoform 2
growth hormone-regulated TBC protein 1 isoform X2
growth hormone-regulated TBC protein 1 isoform X3
growth hormone regulated TBC protein 1, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
growth hormone-regulated TBC protein 1 isoform X4
collagen alpha-1(II) chain-like, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen alpha-1(II) chain-like, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen alpha-1(II) chain-like, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
collagen alpha-1(II) chain-like isoform X2
collagen alpha-1(II) chain-like isoform X3
collagen alpha-1(II) chain-like isoform X4
ADP-ribosylhydrolase like 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
ADP-ribosylhydrolase like 1, transcript variant 1
ADP-ribosylhydrolase like 1, transcript variant 2
[Protein ADP-ribosylarginine] hydrolase-like protein 1 isoform X1
[Protein ADP-ribosylarginine] hydrolase-like protein 1 isoform 1
[Protein ADP-ribosylarginine] hydrolase-like protein 1 isoform 2
DCN1, defective in cullin neddylation 1, domain containing 2, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 58 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
DCN1, defective in cullin neddylation 1, domain containing 2, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 49 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
DCN1, defective in cullin neddylation 1, domain containing 2
DCN1, defective in cullin neddylation 1, domain containing 2, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 50 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
DCN1, defective in cullin neddylation 1, domain containing 2, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 48 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
DCN1, defective in cullin neddylation 1, domain containing 2, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 47 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 129 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 120 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 117 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 66 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 58 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 104 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3 isoform X1
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3 isoform X3
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3 precursor
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3 isoform X4
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3 isoform X5
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3 isoform X2
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3 isoform X6
transmembrane and coiled-coil domains 3, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 65 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 3 isoform X7
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant 2
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 256 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 224 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant 1
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 222 ESTs, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 184 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 249 ESTs, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 204 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
transcription factor Dp-1, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 156 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
ATPase, H+/K+ exchanging, beta polypeptide
potassium-transporting ATPase subunit beta
similar to RNA sequence, mRNA (same species):RefSeq:NM_002929.2
The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions and aligns at 52% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
similar to AA sequence (same species):RefSeq:NP_002920.1
The RefSeq protein aligns at 58% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions and 1 indel and aligns at 48% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
The RefSeq protein aligns at 41% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 552
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X12
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X10
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X13
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X11
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X6
transmembrane protein 255B, transcript variant X9
growth arrest-specific 6, transcript variant 1
growth arrest-specific 6, transcript variant 2
growth arrest-specific 6, transcript variant 3
growth arrest-specific protein 6 isoform 1 precursor
growth arrest-specific protein 6 isoform 2
growth arrest-specific protein 6 isoform 3
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 454
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 452, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 19% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 452
long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 565
polycystic kidney disease protein 1-like 3-like
The sequence of the model RefSeq transcript was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred complete CDS: deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
The sequence of the model RefSeq protein was modified relative to this genomic sequence to represent the inferred complete CDS: deleted 3 bases in 2 codons; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon.
LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: polycystic kidney disease protein 1-like 3-like
glutamic acid-rich protein-like, transcript variant X1
glutamic acid-rich protein-like isoform X1
glutamic acid-rich protein-like, transcript variant X2
glutamic acid-rich protein-like isoform X2
RAS p21 protein activator 3, transcript variant X2
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 121 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
ras GTPase-activating protein 3 isoform X2
uncharacterized LOC101929355, transcript variant X2
uncharacterized LOC101929355, transcript variant X3
uncharacterized LOC101929355, transcript variant X4
uncharacterized LOC101929355, transcript variant X1
uncharacterized protein C17orf105 homolog isoform X2
uncharacterized protein C17orf105 homolog isoform X3
uncharacterized protein C17orf105 homolog isoform X4
cell division cycle 16, transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 157 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell division cycle 16, transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 122 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell division cycle 16, transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 114 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell division cycle 16, transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 115 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell division cycle 16, transcript variant 2
cell division cycle 16, transcript variant 1
cell division cycle 16, transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 152 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell division cycle 16, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 114 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell division cycle 16, transcript variant X8
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 153 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
cell division cycle protein 16 homolog isoform X1
cell division cycle protein 16 homolog isoform X7
cell division cycle protein 16 homolog isoform X3
cell division cycle protein 16 homolog isoform X8
UPF3 regulator of nonsense transcripts homolog A (yeast), transcript variant 1
UPF3 regulator of nonsense transcripts homolog A (yeast), transcript variant 2
UPF3 regulator of nonsense transcripts homolog A (yeast), transcript variant X7
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 123 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
UPF3 regulator of nonsense transcripts homolog A (yeast), transcript variant X3
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
isoform hUpf3p is encoded by transcript variant 1; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
regulator of nonsense transcripts 3A isoform hUpf3p
isoform hUpf3pdelta is encoded by transcript variant 2; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
regulator of nonsense transcripts 3A isoform hUpf3pdelta
regulator of nonsense transcripts 3A isoform X3
UPF3 regulator of nonsense transcripts homolog A (yeast), transcript variant X5
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 125 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
UPF3 regulator of nonsense transcripts homolog A (yeast), transcript variant X6
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 125 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
UPF3 regulator of nonsense transcripts homolog A (yeast), transcript variant X4
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 124 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
regulator of nonsense transcripts 3A isoform X6
regulator of nonsense transcripts 3A isoform X4
regulator of nonsense transcripts 3A isoform X5
chromosome alignment maintaining phosphoprotein 1, transcript variant 1
chromosome alignment maintaining phosphoprotein 1, transcript variant 2
chromosome alignment maintaining phosphoprotein 1, transcript variant 3
chromosome alignment maintaining phosphoprotein 1, transcript variant X1
Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 92 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
chromosome alignment-maintaining phosphoprotein 1
chromosome alignment-maintaining phosphoprotein 1 isoform X1